Rookie question: checking return to operation status

Similar Questions

• How to check the internal operations, Manager of competitor status in Oracle Apps R12 of en

  Step by step how to check the internal operations, Manager of competitor status in Oracle Apps R12 of front end and how to start their.

  Richa says:
  Step by step how to check the internal operations, Manager of competitor status in Oracle Apps R12 from front end

  Simultaneous treatment - platform generic competitor Manager Questions / answers [ID 105133.1]

  and how to start the

  (1) using the adcmctl.sh (from the backend)
  (2) using the button Activate (from front) - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18727_01/doc.121/e12893/T174296T174302.htm#4334248

  Thank you
  Hussein

• http error: the Http Transport returned a 0 status code

  I joined ajax in my JSF 2.0 with valueChangeListener page. The application works in Firefox and Opera, fine, but not in Google Chrome and IE 8 it is errror.
  
  Here is the part of the form that causes the error:
  
  < h:selectOneRadio id = "tenantId" onchange = "submit () '"
  value = "#{contractBean.tenantTypeId} '"
  valueChangeListener = "#{contractBean.tenantTypeChanged}" >
  < f: selectItems value = "#{contractBean.tenantTypes}" / >
  < f: ajax event = "click on" rendering = "tenantId tenantPanel" / >
  < / h:selectOneRadio >
  
  http error: the Http Transport returned a 0 status code. It is usually the result of a mix of ajax and demand complete. It is generally undesirable for reasons of integrity performance and data.
  
  What should I do to fix this error? I need ajax in this page and I want to use it with JSF.
  
  Published by: user13179176 on December 21, 2010 10:56
  
  Published by: user13179176 on December 21, 2010 10:57
  
  Published by: user13179176 on December 21, 2010 11:02

  You have onchange = submit (), which is a complete application and an Ajax event on event = ' click on ', which is an Ajax request. You don't need those two, or in any case you can not have two of them, as the error message tells you. Find another solution.

• C error: ld: library not found for - introduction collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

  I'm trying to compile the "Hello World" code C base with gcc, but the following error message:

  LD: library not found for - introduction

  collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

  The code itself is nice, he ran into another computer with no problems.

  First gcc had manually, the problem, installed and then uninstalled and installed with homebrew and still have the problem. How can I fix?

  (Have the 5.1.0 version of gcc)

  Okay, so nobody has responded, but I found a solution. This is the version of gcc, apparently more recent versions have this bug, one that works and compiles the codes is the 4.9 version, in case it would be useful to someone.

• Operational status SCCP bring up is successful. message not sent to port or VTY sessions to THE

  Hello

  On a Cisco IOS router, when the command of the CSPC is configured, the following message is sent to the console port:

  Operational status SCCP bring up is successful

  However, this message is not sent to telnet or ssh sessions through VTYs, or ports in the

  Is this a bug?

  I tested it on:

  2821 router running IOS Version 12.4 (24) T6 with function ADVENTERPRISEK9 defined

  2801 router running IOS Version 12.4 (24) T6 with function SPSERVICESK9 defined

  2801 router running IOS Version 12.4 (24) T6 with function ADVENTERPRISEK9 defined

  2921 router running IOS Version 15.2 (3) T

  2851 router running IOS Version 12.4 (24) T6 with function ADVENTERPRISEK9 defined

  Gateway analog voice VG224 running IOS Version 15.1 (3) T1

  Router 7206VXR with NPE - 400, running IOS Version 15.1 (4) M4 with the ADVENTERPRISEK9 option

  I'd say it's a (minor) bug.  An IOS programmer SHOULD have sent the message to the logging engine, but sometimes a programmers could write a message directly to the console for internal diagnostics during development, even if it is not the best practice.

  They should remove this message before sending the code, or make a call suitable for the engine of logging to announce the event through standard logging mechanisms.

  Please engage the TAC in order to get a bug filed.

• difference between the operational status of APs to the TOP and REG (registered)

  Hello guys,.

  I want to know what is the difference between the operational status of APs to the TOP and REG?

  Thanks in advance

  A radio operating state is up/down.  REG AP means that the PA has joined with success the controller.  The AP must be in the State REG (registry) radios appear.

  -Scott

  Please evaluate the useful messages *.

• User experienced Smartphone blackBerry, rookie question

  I grew up on BES and seeks to upgrade the phone to my wife (a moto Q w/verizon using wirelesssync which provides the full synchronization of OTA - email, calendar, contacts, etc. - w/outlook). I understand that without a BES, BIS only synchronizes e-mail (calendar, contacts, etc. should be done via USB?). Here is the rookie question: does BIS for synchronization of full e-mail with outlook (readings, deletions, etc. on the PC or the BB) - or are there other limitations?

  I don't like to lose the full OTA sync, but would be ready to give that up if the synchronization of outlook e-mail via BIS works exactly like the BES. e-mail is an address of @ameritech.net (yahoo). phone would an 8330. Thanks much for the ideas that you can share.

  Not quite acutally.

  BIS does not synchronize or reconcile email 'most'. He left with Gmail, Yahoo and IMAP mail servers. It does not reconcile all mail on the pop server And none of this with Outlook (i, e., if you delete an email in Outlook, it will not be deleted on your BB, except in some configurations of IMAP where Outlook also deletes the message on the mail server, it then reconciles this deletion on the BB.)

  Honestly, if you want full mail reconcile, you should look into an exchange server hosted for her, such as

  http://www.BlackBerryForums.com/banners/exchangemymail2.jpg

  Who help me?

• AP 1131ag 802. 11 a Oper status = down

  I have a Cisco WLC 2106 and 1131ag Access Point.  The 802. 11a / g Radio 'Operational status' = down.  All the other radios that are on the RISE.  I wonder if this is a normal behavior that none of the clients are connecting to it on the 802. 11a / g Radio.  Can we confirm or provide assistance with the fix.

  Thank you

  On the homepage, click the "Détails" link under all items.  Choose the AP make sure under status choose 'Activate' in the menu dropdown.

  When you console in the AP, are you sure it is down/down and not zero/down reset?

• EtherCAT - OR Scan Engine could not be changed in Active mode, because one or several slave devices does not have operational status

  Hello, I use a Compact Rio 9074 with an EtherCAT NI 9144 chassis extension

  I am able to see both devices 9074 and 9144 Labview project, but when I try to deploy configuration 9074 controller tracking error is displayed:

  

  I tried deployment while defining the Configuration Mode and Active Mode. Also, when I check on the status of master Ethercat online its State in: pre-operational with errors. And appers this message: error-2147137769 occurred at an unidentified place

  

  I'm using Labview 2011 and the OR cRio has installed:

  

  I tried formatting cRio and reinstall NI Ethercat and scanner again

  I wonder if anyone has the same problem, I'd appreciate any help.

  Thanks in advance

  Thank you very much, DirkW worked for me immediately

• Operational status - WLC 2504 AND LAP 3501

  The AP is connected to the WLC but guard take down is Raodio. As suggested, I played with the settings of PoE, nothing helps...

  Sea 1 18:30:36 Feb 2012	AP Interface: 0(802.11b) State Down operation: basic Radio MAC: e8:ba:70:93:81:60 Cause = reset interface radio status: NA
  3	Sea 1 18:30:36 Feb 2012	AP Interface: 0(802.11b) operation State Up: basic Radio MAC: e8:ba:70:93:81:60 Cause = Admin on Radio status change: Enable
  4	Sea 1 18:30:36 Feb 2012	AP Interface: 0(802.11b) State Down operation: basic Radio MAC: e8:ba:70:93:81:60 Cause = Admin on Radio status change: disable
  5	Sea 1 18:25:32 Feb 2012	AP Interface: 0(802.11b) State Down operation: basic Radio MAC: e8:ba:70:93:81:60 Cause = reset interface radio status: NA
  6	Sea 1 18:25:29 Feb 2012	AP Interface: 0(802.11b) operation State Up: basic Radio MAC: e8:ba:70:93:81:60 Cause = Radio reset due to the Init. Status: NA

  Any ideas... I've checked everything... AP is Port 4 of the WLC

  *Mar  1 00:00:12.988: %SOAP_FIPS-2-SELF_TEST_RAD_FAILURE: RADIO crypto FIPS self                                 test failed at 128 bit AMAC AEC CCM encrypt on interface Dot11Radio 0 -Process=                                 "Init", ipl= 0, pid= 3 

  Now, that's what I was looking for!

  Your 802. 11 b radio is dead.  Please contact Cisco to get this replaced WAP.

• CTS telephone operational status

  Hello

  I'm trying to monitor the operating condition of the IP phone connected to a CTS-1300 via SNMP, however I found that the MIB (MIB-TELEPRESENCE-CISCO) related to this material does not deal specifically of this requirement.

  As far as I could test, ctpPeripheralStatus (1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.643.1.2.1.1.3) would indicate only the attached status but not telepresence-ready status, which in turn is somewhat different from the point of view of the CallManager (registered/not registered), given that the phone could be registered to CUCM and actually not OK to take calls.

  So what I found an empirical point of view, it is that readiness is obtained when the phone has successfully downloads and installs the MIDlet, which in turn is reflected in the election of the MIB extraction ctpPeripheralDescription (1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.643.1.2.1.1.2):

  ctpPeripheralDescription

  
  

  ISO.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.643.1.2.1.1.2.2 = STRING: "IP_PHONE - MACAddress = AABBCCDDEE, HostName = SEPAABBCCDDEE, PhoneDN = 1000, AppLoadID = jar75sip.9 - 2-1TH1 - 13.sbn,

  BootLoadID = tnp75.8 - 3-4 - 16BN01.bin, Version = SIP75.921 S, HardwareRevision = 11.0,

  SerialNumber = ABC12345XYZ, ModelNumber = CP - 7975 G,MidletVersion = Transport SPM - 1.8.1 - P1 - 1s"

  ctpPeripheralStatus

  ISO.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.643.1.2.1.1.3.2 = INTEGER: 0

  CtpPeripheralStatusCode: = TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

  Current STATUS

  DESCRIPTION

  "The textual convention identifies the State of the device.

  noError (0).

  Expected device works through

  the port is attached.

  ctpPeripheralDeviceCategory

  ISO.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.643.1.2.1.1.4.2 = INTEGER: 3

  CtpPeripheralDeviceCategoryCode ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION

      STATUS          current

      DESCRIPTION

          "The textual convention identifies the peripheral type.

          unknown              (0)  -- Unknown Device

          other                (1)  -- None of the listed device

          uplinkDevice         (2)  -- Device attached to CTS uplink port

          ipPhone              (3)  -- IP phone

  If ctpPeripheralDescription display the software of the phone listed, then it is good. Maybe the status OK/not OK seen through CTS GUI is displayed after an assessment of this kind?

  I have already laid around and did some additional tests along, but apparently it's the only way to properly assert via SNMP simple, if the phone does not work correctly.

  Is there another way to check this?

  Thanks in advance,

  Gabriel

  Hello Gabriel,

  Since you had no response, and yet I'm scanning my archives of memory and what you have concluded matches what is in the MIB, RFC and Message to SNMP trap doc for the CTS systems:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/cucm_cts/cucm_cts_admin_book/guide/cucm_cts_admin_mibs.html

  The displayed phone charge, version midlet and the status of noError (0) of the ipPhone (3) should coincide with no error in the GUI and the phone successfully, showing the midlets and ready for telepresence.

  HTH,

  Paula

• FDMEE 11.1.2.3 report Check returns empty

  Hi everyone-

  A problem with our 11.1.2.3.500 FDMEE application where audit reports come back completely empty. Is not only the metadata for checking empty return rule (tiling, under title, the target accounts, rules), but the whole of the report, including the header information, which is part of the model of audit report.  If it was only the rule check empty return information I believe it was a bad game to the top of the logic of Straightedge, but I find it odd that ValidationGroup/location/category/period in the header is not returned.  Some screenshots below for reference:

  

  * Note that the rule in this screenshot of the control rule simply checks to see if the POV is = 0.  As no data is loaded, it should pass.   Remove the rule has no bearing on the question.

  Some things to note:

  -Default audit report has been set to 'Check the report' system, application, and user-level

  -Verification rules group has been assigned to the correct location

  -This has been tested this with multiple groups of rules to check and default audit reports.  This includes reducing the rule of control group to the "title" line to try to exclude a set a bad place the logic of checking rule.

  -This has been tested on a test HFM application separated with the same result.

  -J' have reviewed the report for the monitoring report query and I saw that he derived from the TDATACHECK table.  When you do a select * query this table SQL, there is no record of.  Found this very strange and probably the root of the problem, but not clear cause why this happens.

  -Fix the complete log, but attention the next section, where I think the error is occurring (line begins on the journal 792).

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 110 [AIF] DEBUG: AIFUtil.callOdiServlet - START

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 203 [AIF] INFO: * BEGIN CHECKING PROCESSES *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 266 [AIF] INFO: * CONDITION LOGIC *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 982 [AIF] INFO: NO DATA

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 997 [AIF] INFO: THE TARGET CELL DATA: 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 997 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: round (0.2)

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 075 INFO [AIF]: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 091 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 091 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: 0,0 = 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 169 [AIF]:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 169 [AIF] INFO: * DISPLAY LOGIC *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 512 [AIF] INFO: NO DATA

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 543 [AIF] INFO: THE TARGET CELL DATA: 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 543 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: round (0.2)

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 INFO [AIF]: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 715 [AIF] INFO: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 715 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 715 [AIF]:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 715 [AIF]: error occurred during the rule of checking running.

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 731 DEBUG [AIF]: AIFUtil.callOdiServlet - END

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 731 MORTALS [AIF]: error in CommData.checkData

  Traceback (most recent call changed):

  Folder "< string >", line 4730 in checkData

  RuntimeError: java.lang.RuntimeException: error occurred during the screening process.

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 731 DEBUG [AIF]: CommData.updateWorkflow - START

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 731 [AIF] DEBUG:

  UPDATE TLOGPROCESS

  SET PROCESSENDTIME = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP

  PROCESSSTATUS = 42

  PROCESSENTVAL = 0

  ", PROCESSENTVALNOTE =" error "results" ""

  WHERE PARTITIONKEY = 13

  AND CATKEY = 1

  AND PERIODKEY = ' 2015-12-01'

  AND RULE_ID = 17

  Please let me know if you have any questions or need other information.  Thanks for any help in advance.

  -Dan H.

  Hello

  After review of your journal:

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 110 [AIF] DEBUG: CommData.updateWorkflow - END

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 110 [AIF] DEBUG: AIFUtil.callOdiServlet - START

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 203 [AIF] INFO: * BEGIN CHECKING PROCESSES *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:33, 266 [AIF] INFO: * CONDITION LOGIC *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 982 [AIF] INFO: NO DATA

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 997 [AIF] INFO: THE TARGET CELL DATA: 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:34, 997 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: round (0.2)

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 075 INFO [AIF]: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 091 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 091 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: 0,0 = 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 169 [AIF]:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 169 [AIF] INFO: * DISPLAY LOGIC *.

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 512 [AIF] INFO: NO DATA

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 543 [AIF] INFO: THE TARGET CELL DATA: 0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 543 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: round (0.2)

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 INFO [AIF]: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 621 INFO [AIF]: EXPRESSION: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 715 [AIF] INFO: RESULT:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, 715 [AIF] INFO: 0.0

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 715 [AIF]:

  2014-08-05 15:22:35, ERROR 715 [AIF]: error occurred during the rule of checking running.

  It seems that there are problems with your rules of audit. Have you checked the carefully?

  HFM data are inserted into TDATACHECK according to your definition.

  Please try with a simple rule for a single account. Use the wizard to create the rule that you do not miss any field

  Concerning

• Question about the Windows operating system upgrade

  If I were to upgrade to Windows Vista, when it is released in the future the warranty on my laptop is cancelled? And Toshiba install it for me at a lower price? (I know stupid Question but I was wondering)

  Hello

  First of all at the moment the Windows vista is not official on the market. AFAIK this lead on Windows Vista operating system will come at the end of the year or next year. Second, this unit was delivered with another Windows operating system. The Toshiba service partner can install your device only with the delivered operating system.

• Please explain CVI question #335358: using the operator of bit-shift twice on the same line of code produces incorrect results

  Hello

  I just stumbled on http://www.ni.com/white-paper/12323/en#335358_by_Category.

  With the help of the bit-shift operator twice on the same line of code produces incorrect results.
  Workaround: Separate the operations of shift of two bits in two distinct lines of code.

  Reported Version: 9.0

  Solved Version: N/A

  Added the: 14/02/2012

  Could someone please explain what kind of construction causes such a question?

  I have not noticed problems again and not have not noticed or found a thread about it.

  Thank you.

  The reported scenario looks like this:

  unsigned int a = 1, b = 62;
  unsigned  long long result = 1ULL << a << b;
  

  The problem arises because of the temporary variable used when do two little is placed in the same line. This separation into two lines will produce correct results:

  unsigned int a = 1, b = 62;
  unsigned  long long result = 1ULL << a;
  result = result << b;
  

• Question on V$ SESSION. STATUS column

  DB version: 11.2.0.4 on Oracle Linux 6.4

  V$ SESSION. STATUS: My question is about the IDLE State.

  Under what circumstances does V$ SESSION. STATUS become INACTIVE for a session?

  For a particular run SQL, if the session has to wait a/o lock or Table being released, will be V$ SESSION. Change of STATUS to "INACTIVE"?

  If the session is waiting for an i/o for a lock or a lock, its status is ACTIVE.

  However, after the current call ends its status is INACTIVE.

  If the session sends multiple lines to a customer and the number of lines, such that it exceeds the size of the array, the session must make several calls to send the rows to the client.  Between calls, even if she is waiting for the client to recognize the last set of rows sent, its status may be INACTIVE.

  Similarly, while the session waits for the next SQL statement of the client, its status would be INACTIVE.

  Hemant K Collette