Routers chained E900 - double NAT

Similar Questions

• Strange double NAT, although there is only a single router

  My ISP (RCN) changed my modem at a speed greater than one.  Although a router built-in, I told them that I didn't use their router, only my Time Capsule, so they disabled.  However, my Time Capsule kept gives me an error message Double NAT and amber flashing against Green, even though everything seemed to work (wireless and wired) and said that I should switch DHCP and NAT to bridge mode.  Correction of the error, but I do not understand what caused the Double NAT if there is only a single router.  The ISP Technical Support people confirmed their control center is not the router feature on in the new modem, I ask.  They also said that their network supports DHCP, although they have other who use the Bridge Mode, although they do not support.   And they knew nothing about it, he said to ask Apple.  They also offered to switch back, but because this modem is faster at the same price.  (He called a bypass gateway 3-in-1).  Many people online told not to use his router, it's why I unplug it and only use the time Capsule.

  So if someone can give me feedback, I'd appreciate it. I must:

  1. keep running the new modem and my Time Capsule in Bridge Mode.

  2. run the new modem in DHCP mode, as they put in place and do not worry Time Capsule seeing amber / flashing Double NAT error.

  3 swap back to the previous modem, which was 50 Mbps against it with (theoretically) 155 Mbit/s (it's only works in 50-70).

  I'm not really all that, but I hope that one of you maybe.  Thank you!!!

  Although a router built-in, I told them that I didn't use their router, only my Time Capsule, so they disabled.

  ISPS often make the mistake of simply turn off the radio on a modem/router...which service does not disable the router function of the device. You still have a wired router when ISPS are making this mistake.

  However, my Time Capsule kept giving me an error message Double NAT

  This confirms again that the ISP has not disabled the function of the router to your modem/router.  On some modems/routers or gateways, it is not possible to get the device to act as a simple modem.

  The ISP Technical Support people confirmed their control center is not the router feature on in the new modem, I ask.

  The fact remains that you wouldn't see a Double NAT error unless the ISP system acted as a router... Despite what people of PSI say. You may need to get a 2nd or 3rd person-level support, who knows what they are doing.

  1. keep running the new modem and my Time Capsule in Bridge Mode.

  Yes, if you want to avoid the mistake of NAT Double... what you are doing. But, the time Capsule will not be your router.  The device of the ISP will be.

  2. run the new modem in DHCP mode, as they put in place and do not worry Time Capsule seeing amber / flashing Double NAT error.

  This only if you willing to accept the fact that the ISP did not correctly change your gateway to make it work as a simple modem only.  You might be able to get away with a Double NAT error on a simple network, but there is no reason more complicate things with a misconfiguration in unless whether there are a few reasons to do it and it can't be avoided.

  3 swap back to the previous modem, which was 50 Mbps against it with (theoretically) 155 Mbit/s (it's only works in 50-70).

  Your decision if you want to run a simple modem with time Capsule, or accept the fact that the time Capsule won't have your router when it is configured in Bridge Mode, or you see a Double NAT error on the network.

  If it were me, I would go back to what I know will work properly... the simple modem and time Capsule as the router.

• Garage double NAT & DHCP - bridge Possible issue error

  Help...

  So it's my game on a yacht...

  I have a MacMini (run bootcamp Windows 7 Pro), so actually it's a PC.

  • I use internal WiFi adapter of the MacMini to get my internet connection of various different Marina I could stay in
  • I then share the connection with the internal LAN adapter WiFi adapter WiFi
  • This allows me to share the WiFi port with other devices on the yacht

  Then I have an AirPort Extreme-

  • I then run an Ethernet on the MacMini Port CAT6 cable
  • on port WAN on AirPort Extreme
  • AirPort Extreme now has an internet connection (from the marina, WiFi)
  • I then activated the WiFi on AirPort Extreme to create a WiFi network on the yacht
  • and it gets its internet connection from the WAN port, which comes in turn the MacMini, which in turn comes from the Marina WiFi

  Connected to the AirPort Extreme are-

  -iPhones, iPads, MacBook, Apple TV, Smart TV, etc etc.

  -Some devices are connected using the LAN ports and AirPort Extreme cable

  -Some devices are connected by WiFi using WiFi airports

  I want DHCP to be handled by the AirPort Extreme-, mode I set as "DHCP and NAT".

  What is the problem-

  • AirPort Extreme shows an error
  • "double NAT and DHCP.
  • and suggested I turn it in Bridge mode
  • but I don't want to do that

  Any thoughts?

  Concerning

  Tim

  Would help if we could get the exact message you see.  You will probably need to change the DHCP-range on the AirPort Extreme to a different value, and then use the option 'Ignore' the Double NAT then the airport will show a green light.

  You will have to live with the Double NAT if you want AirPort Extreme to act as a remote router that provides a private network.

• Airport Extreme Double NAT / AT & T NVG510

  My Internet connection has worked very well for several years, until recently, when the simple DSL modem (a Motorola 2210-02 - 1ATT) provided by AT & T began to experience intermittent outages. Initially, the DSL modem would lose the line for a minute or two at a time. But within 48 hours, the line started to drop during the hours in a row (synchronization failed line DSL). Whenever the modem has lost the line, my Airport Extreme (the router on my home network), shows a "Double NAT" alert. But whenever the modem 2210-02 DSL connection has been restored, alert the Airport Extreme's "Double NAT" disappeared.

  After a day and a half problems, the line is down for so many hours that I finally called AT & T to check the status of our range. So, AT & T sent a technician who concluded fairly quickly the 2210-02-1ATT was the problem and replaced it with a modem/router combo (manufacturing date 11/2014) NVG510 (with router function disabled in the settings).

  The speed that results and the quality of the connection via the NVG510 were good, so the tech packed 2210-02 in his bag and left. But now I get that alert "Double NAT" once again on my Airport Extreme, even if the home network is apparently working as well as it ever did.

  The only setting I changed was on the NVG510 - as soon as the technology has left, I turned off the WiFi on the NVG510 function because I want the Airport Extreme to my router, same as always.

  So far so good. After 24 hours with the NVG510 in place, the network worked well with no major hiccups, the only exception being the status of "Double NAT" alert displayed in Airport utility. In fact, had I have not bothered to watch Airport utility, I don't know that there was a "Double NAT" alert

  Everything on the side of the NVG510 LAN is identical to what was in place with the 2210-02...

  Airport Extreme 802.11ac works as "router" with the WiFi signal on another floor via an Airport Extreme 802.11n wireless (5th generation).

  The WiFi signal provides web access to some desktop Mac, AppleTV, devices, mobile phones, tablet computers and a laptop (laptop is the only device that uses a VPN).

  The network on the Airport Express 802.11ac, who serves as router, is "DHCP and NAT." and the "5th Gen," which extends the wireless network, set mode "bridge."

  After hours of searching online, I understand that this problem is surely the result of the NVG510, and that this problem exists for at least five years. I've read at least a few tens of different ways to try a fix via adjustments to settings, but none reached the level of a real solution.

  Although my network is no problem at the moment, I'm afraid that "Double NAT" alert is a sword of Damocles that will eventually crash my network, a situation I like to avoid. I dared not yet connect the laptop with a VPN to the router, but out of fear that will bring down the whole network.

  I'd rather solve the "Double NAT" proactively.

  Is there a a way to eliminate the Double "Nat" by adjusting the parameters of the NVG510 and/or the Airport Extreme?  Or, my fears of future problems and a VPN disaster are unfounded?

  Thank you

  According to your comments, the NVG510 has not been reconfigured as a bridge and is providing routing functions (NAT & DHCP).

  To resolve the Double NAT is the new Motorola NVG510 or AirPort Extreme needs to be reconfigured under a bridge. The simplest solution would be to reconfigure the extreme. In this way, the NVG510 can handle NAT & DHCP services required by clients of network connected to the extreme to access the Internet.

  To reconfigure the extreme as a gateway, use the AirPort Utility, as follows:

  • Run the AirPort Utility and then select the extreme.
  • Click on Extreme and then, select Edit.
  • Click the network tab to select it.
  • Change the router Mode to: Off (bridge Mode)
  • Click on update and allow extreme restart.

• Question about the issue of the Double NAT...

  Hah I posted for a little.  I have a question about Double NAT.  Is it wise to launch?  Reason why is that I have a WRT54G v6 router and the Zoom ADSL X 4 Modem/Router/gateway and it seems that sites take just a little more time to respond to Web sites.  I just want to know I have to turn off (i.e., go in with my router bridge Mode) or what.  Or leave it alone.  Now one last thing: that the problem of slow could actually be AT & T but I have the feeling that this isn't.

  What configuration options you have on the Zyxel to fill? What have you tried exactly?

  The basis for the first option is:

  * Bridged Zyxel.

  * Linksys configured for PPPoE with your user name and password for the internet connection.

  Instructions to fill the Zyxel are here or here depending on the exact model of Zyxel.

  The second option is:

  * Zyxel doing business as the router. I assume here that the Zyxel is on 10.0.0.2 with a subnet mask 255.255.255.0.

  Unplug the Linksys to the Zyxel. Connect a computer to the Linksys. Open the web interface of the WRT to http://192.168.1.1/

  On the main Setup page:

  1. change the LAN IP of 192.168.1.1 address 10.0.0.1.

  2 disable the DHCP server.

  3. save the settings. You will lose the connection. Unplug the computer.

  4. wire one of the numbered LAN ports of the Linksys for the Zyxel. Do not use the internet port of Linksys!

  Now you should be able to open the Linksys web interface to http://10.0.0.1/ all devices connected wireless of Linksys or connected to one of the three LAN ports must have a connection to the internet via the Zyxel.

• router in 1921 with the double nat ADSL problem

  I have problems with the implementation of a router in 1921 with double lines ADSL for failover. For some reason any internet traffic keeps using Dialer 1 as internet main connection, while 2 Dialer should be primary. Also, when I finish my NAT with allowed a full acl, it translates the public ip address of the 2-to-1 Dialer the Dialer before she sends in the internet.

  This is my config:

  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  Voice netwerk description
  IP 192.168.77.254 255.255.255.0
  IP helper 192.168.177.1
  IP helper 192.168.177.254
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  Inside the interface description
  IP 192.168.177.254 255.255.255.0
  IP mtu 1492
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  ATM0/0/0 interface
  Description 1/10 Mb Tele2 ADSL
  no ip address
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  PVC 0/35
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0/0
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  ATM0/1/0 interface
  no ip address
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1/0
  VDSL 5/50 Mb KPN description
  no ip address
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1/0.6
  KPN VDSL description
  encapsulation dot1Q 6
  PPPoE enable global group
  PPPoE-client dial-pool-number 2
  service-policy output parent policy
  !
  interface Dialer1
  Tele2 ADSL description
  the negotiated IP address
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP mtu 1492
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  encapsulation ppp
  IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
  Dialer pool 1
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP pap sent-username *.
  No cdp enable
  card crypto SAL_map
  !
  interface Dialer2
  VDSL KPN description
  the negotiated IP address
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP mtu 1492
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  encapsulation ppp
  IP tcp adjust-mss 1400
  load-interval 30
  Dialer pool 2
  PPP authentication pap callin
  PPP pap sent-username *.
  No cdp enable
  card crypto SAL_map_VDSL

  !

  IP nat inside source overload map route sheep interface Dialer1
  IP nat inside source overload map route nonat2 interface Dialer2
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer2 Track1
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1 254
  !

  auto discovering IP sla
  ALS IP 10
  echo ICMP - 62.69.174.75 source-interface Dialer2
  Timeout 30000
  frequency 30
  Annex IP SLA 10 life never start-time now
  !

  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.249
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.249
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.179.0 0.0.0.255 host 192.168.1.249
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 172.28.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip any 192.168.255.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip any 192.168.254.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.179.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.79.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.78.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.179.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.178.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.79.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 deny ip 192.168.77.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.78.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.177.0 0.0.0.255 any
  access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.77.0 0.0.0.255 any
  !

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow
  Dialer-list 2 ip protocol allow
  !
  nonat2 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 102
  Set the interface Dialer2
  !
  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 102
  Set the interface Dialer1

  the ACL is built to exclude some ips private for ipsec VPN destinations.

  Any suggestions on what I'm missing? It must use dialer 2 as primary internet connection and failover of Dialer 1 if IP SLA fails. The SLA config seems to work properly:

  SH ip route

  S * 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer2
  84.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 84.246.25.231 is directly connected, Dialer1
  145.131.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 145.131.131.112 is directly connected, Dialer2
  192.168.77.0/24 is variably divided into subnets, 2 subnets, 2 masks
  C 192.168.77.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
  The 192.168.77.254/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
  192.168.177.0/24 is variably divided into subnets, 2 subnets, 2 masks
  C 192.168.177.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1
  The 192.168.177.254/32 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1
  192.168.254.0/24 is variably divided into subnets, 2 subnets, 2 masks
  S 192.168.254.0/24 is directly connected, Dialer2
  192.168.254.37/32 S [1/0] via 77.241.229.241
  S 192.168.255.0/24 is directly connected, Dialer1
  212.121.121.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 212.121.121.183 is directly connected, Dialer2
  213.144.228.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 213.144.228.72 is directly connected, Dialer1

  http://docwiki.Cisco.com/wiki/category:NAT

  Above document indicates "Beware of the use of the ACL for the NAT with" ip allow a whole ' you can get unpredictable results. " I suggest using the "road-map sheep/nonat2 permit 20" instead of "allow a whole."

  For others, change the config as follows-

  !

  ALS IP 10
  Dialer2 interface source ICMP echo 8.8.8.8
  Timeout 30000
  frequency 30
  Annex IP SLA 10 life never start-time now

  !

  IP route 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255 permanent dialer2

  !

  !
  nonat2 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 102
  match interface Dialer2
  !
  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 102
  match interface Dialer1

  !

  IP nat inside source overload map route sheep interface Dialer1
  IP nat inside source overload map route nonat2 interface Dialer2

  !

  NAT-TRACK event manager applet

  track event 1 show all

  order cli action 0.1 'enable '.

  action 0.2 wait 2

  action command 0.3 cli "clear ip nat translations forced."

  action 0.4 syslog msg "Translation NAT cleared after state change of track"

  !

  -Ginette

• Cisco 2911 and ASA 5512 remove double NAT

  Greetings,

  I have 2 subnets on Cisco 2911 router

  192.168.3.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24

  3rd network 192.168.4.0/24 is natting internal interface to the modem for internet access. creating 2 NAT (NAT in router) and NAT in Modem

  I just bought Cisco ASA 5512, no chance I could remove the Cisco 2911 router NAT and set the default gateway for Cisco ASA?

  Yes you are right...

  You must ensure that you get the routed LAN traffioc to hit inside the interface ASA in ASA, you can do PAT/NAT to access...

  Concerning

  Knockaert

• Quote modification value chain "to double quote & quot;

  I create a list with the different codes of law within the single quotes as follows
  < cfset corlist = "'1100', ' 1200' ', ' 1300 '", ' 1700 ' ", ' 1800 '", ' 1950 ', '7001' ">" "
  When I do an output
  for
  < cfoutput > AND idbillcode in (#corlist #) < / cfoutput >
  
  Get the values as follows
  AND idbillcode IN ('1100', ' 1200' ", ' 1300 '", ' 1700 ' ", ' 1800 '", ' 1950 ' ", ' 7001 ')
  
  
  However when I put the same string in a cfquery apostrophes get replaced by double quotes as follows
  
  AND idbillcode IN ("1100", "1200", "1300", "1700", "1800", "1950", "7001") that generates an error.
  
  Anyone have clues.
  
  Thank you.

  I found the answer PreserveSingleQuotes. Thank you

• Double error NAT with Ooma

  I use a time for Backup Capsule and WIFI. I have a cable box to receive Internet.

  I am positioning the Ooma telo between the internet modem and TC box.

  It works, BUT I have a flashing yellow light of TC. I guess that's a double NAT error.

  I know that to go to the wireless utility but you choose DHCP only or bridge?

  If so, should I put a static IP address... If Yes, how should I do this?

  If someone here could provide simple step by step instructions... the above may SEEM like I know what I got kindof... but I don't.

  Thank you.

  Are you still using OS X (10.6.8)... as you indicate in your profile?

  If this is not the case, what operating system are you using right now?

• Router and Modem terms as device NAT Double - Solutions?

  Two questions I have about DSL/PPPoE

  (1) look in these forums, it is said that if you have a DSL modem, then you need to change your IP 192.168.2.1 could someone tell me why just for my own knowledge?

  (2) another question I have is what I use PPPoE if I have a DSL modem? Changing automatic DHCP to PPPoE willl solve my problem with my xbox not finding online games?

  (3) what I need to change my router in Bridge mode and is the same thing as mixed? If not how can I change due to bridge mode I've read that my router and modem are could act as a double NAT that could cause problems for the xbox?

  Any help would be welcome because I don't have any idea how to solve this

  Problem solved! Combination of mode Bridge and address static ip assigned to the xbox. Thank you guys

• Network: 2 routers Apple broadcasting separate wireless networks; one (Xfinity/Comcast) cable modem

  Hello community!  Need help, I want to use two routers to establish two separate wireless networks on a cable modem connection.  I searched for my answer and see some other threads on this topic, but all are either a bit too technical for me, are incomplete on the answers to my questions - and all seem to be locked.  I have also searched YouTube and only see videos to extend a network with two routers - not my goal.  So here is a long, but a detailed post on what I need someone help with - thank you very much in advance if anyone can all small-not me-I hope it will be useful to others in the future.

  The program installation/hardware: I have internet Comcast/Xfinity that runs to a Motorola surfboard cable modem (SB6141).  I also have two routers apple - a Time Capsule from Apple AirPort (to end 2013) and a new (2016) AirPort Extreme.

  Purpose: This is what I need--I need two separate wireless networks.  Before going further, by using the guest account and 5 GHz of a single router isn't an option for me.  I need to have both wireless networks separate (one of each router), do not talk to each other, or allow access between the two - the only is that they share the Comcast internet gateway.

  My plan is to have the cable modem Surfboard connect to airport Time Capsule, which will then connect to AirPort Extreme (even if it could be reverse - no difference, except that the data that I show below comes from the time Capsule, which is currently connected to the modem cable).

  To read the previous discussions, it seems that the starting point would be: modem router #1 Ethernet WAN, then a router cable #1 LAN Ethernet to the Router #2.

  First issue of clarification - the connecting cable should go to the Ethernet WAN port on the Router #2 or a LAN Ethernet port?

  Now that the first easy question is the road, I need help to configure two routers connected to allow two separate networks.  A lot of discussions about the positions of static IP addresses, cascade, etc..  I need specific help with AirPort Utility on what to change on what router.  It seems obvious that the settings under the 'Internet' and 'Network' tabs are those who need to set - the 'wireless' tabs simply treats the name of the wireless network and settings - these, at least I can understand!

  I'll organise this tabbed - here go us.

  First of all, the "Internet" tab/window Airport utility. Here are the options:

  Connect using: Router #1 has currently DHCP (which I think is OK?) What should it be set to Router #2?

  This tab lists also the current address in IPv4, the (255.255.254.0) subnet mask and the router address.

  It has grayed out information in the boxes for the DNS servers; Name of domain and DNS IPv6 servers.  At the bottom of the window, there is an IPv6 Internet WAN address listed.

  If I click on the "Internet Options" button at the bottom of the window, it takes me to the 'Internet Options' window. Here, there are various IPv6 information - it seems that I can choose the configuration of IPv6 and the IPv6 mode using the drop down boxes/selections were also chosen.  There is also a checkbox 'Enable IPv6 connection sharing'. Are the current settings for these for Router #1: configure IPv6: automatically; IPv6 mode: Native; and check/yes to enable sharing of IPv6.

  Next up, the 'Network' tab utility AirPort/window.

  Here, there is a drop-down menu "Router Mode", a DHCP range listed, and the ability to add or remove reservations DHCP and Port settings.  The DHCP range listed for Router #1 is 10.0.1.2 to 10.0.1.200.  There is currently no reserves DHCP or specified Port settings.  Finally, there is a checkbox to the bottom to "Activate the access control" - it is not currently checked/enabled.

  If I click on the 'Network Options' button at the bottom of the window, it takes me to the "Networking Options" window Here I have areas of entry to specify the DHCP lease duration, can specify the DHCP IPv4 range, as well as part of the extended DHCP IPv4 comments.  There are checkboxes: enable NAT Port Mapping Protocol. Select the host by default (with input if selected text box); Enable the IGMP Snooping; Block incoming IPv6 connections; Allow the Teredo Tunnels; and allow inbound IPSec authentication.

  For this window, here is the current settings on the Router #1:

  DHCP lease is 1 day; Beach DHCP IPv6 is 10.1.2 to 200; Hosts IPv4 DHCP Range is 172.16.42.2 to 200.  The following check boxes are enabled/checked: enable NAT Port Mapping Protocol. Block incoming IPv6 connections; And allow inbound IPSec authentication.

  Who can help me? What parameters, if all do I need to change the #1 router?  How to set up router #2 to make a second wireless network?

  Purpose: This is what I need--I need two separate wireless networks.  Before going further, by using the guest account and 5 GHz of a single router isn't an option for me.  I need to have both wireless networks separate (one of each router), do not talk to each other, or allow access between the two - the only is that they share the Comcast internet gateway.

  What you really need is a combination router / Ethernet switches that s supports VLANdedicated. Given that Apple routers do not, at best, you can potentially get the results that you are looking for, but at a performance cost. In other words, you can have two separate WiFi networks where clients connected to a network can not 'see' those related to another and both routers will always provide access to the Internet through Comcast modem. Note: Arris / Motorola SB6141 isn't a gateway device. Instead, it's a simple modem. A gateway is a router modem combination.

  To do this, should do the following:

  • The Time Capsule (TC) would need to be directly connected to the modem using an Ethernet cable. This base station would remain in its default configuration of the router. In other words, the router Mode (in AirPort Utility) would establish: DHCP and NAT.
  • AirPort Extreme would be directly linked to TB by Ethernet. The cable must be connected to one of the LAN ports on the TC on the WAN port to the extreme. It must also be configured as a router. However, there are differences in the extreme:
    • Use a different name to the Wi - Fi network.
    • Use another range of IP DHCP address. By default, Apple base stations use IP addresses in the 10.0.x.x range. I suggest that you set the base station of the second on 192.168.x.x range.

  There is a major drawback with this configuration. The second base station will be in a State of "Double NAT". Although this "separating" the two networks on different subnets, this condition is not very effective and connected to this network of customers will get lower throughput performance. There is no way around it and it is not recommended.

  First of all, the "Internet" tab/window Airport utility. Here are the options:

  Connect using: Router #1 has currently DHCP (which I think is OK?) What should it be set to Router #2?

  The two should be: DHCP.

  This tab lists also the current address in IPv4, the (255.255.254.0) subnet mask and the router address.

  These leave it as what. The TC is information of IP address of the modem. The extreme, he'll get the TC.

  It has grayed out information in the boxes for the DNS servers; Name of domain and DNS IPv6 servers.  At the bottom of the window, there is an IPv6 Internet WAN address listed.

  These leave it as what.

  If I click on the "Internet Options" button at the bottom of the window, it takes me to the 'Internet Options' window. Here, there are various IPv6 information - it seems that I can choose the configuration of IPv6 and the IPv6 mode using the drop down boxes/selections were also chosen.  There is also a checkbox 'Enable IPv6 connection sharing'. Are the current settings for these for Router #1: configure IPv6: automatically; IPv6 mode: Native; and check/yes to enable sharing of IPv6.

  Unless your ISP provides your IPv6 service, change the IPv6 configuration option to: 'Link-local only' on two base stations.

  Here, there is a drop-down menu "Router Mode", a DHCP range listed, and the ability to add or remove reservations DHCP and Port settings.  The DHCP range listed for Router #1 is 10.0.1.2 to 10.0.1.200.  There is currently no reserves DHCP or specified Port settings.  Finally, there is a checkbox to the bottom to "Activate the access control" - it is not currently checked/enabled.

  Router mode should be: DHCP and NAT to two base stations. Ignore the DHCP reservations and Port settings for now. Let the current DHCP range for the TC. Change the DHCP range for extreme for: 192.168.1.2 a.200. At this point do not access control for each base station.

  Since you seem to need the step by step instructions or need help to understand the different terms networking, I highly recommend that you help you to become familiar with networking, specifically on Apple systems. I suggest you consider taking the e-Book to the next control: take control of your Wi - Fi Applehttps://www.takecontrolbooks.com/apple-wifi network

• NAT Strict an Xbox will switch to open

  Linksys Model: Linksys EA6350-4 has

  I set up a DMZ with the correct settings, giving both my cable, linksys and xbox, but it is still as strict. When I tried port forwarding, my wiFi is going to *, and my xbox is still strict. I would appreciate some help with what I have already reset my router (that I just bought two days ago) to factory settings about 4 different times already.

  EDIT: It is also on a wired Xbox.

  Your ISP modem has NAT if your in a double NAT condition that is not recommended:

  http://NA.SMC.com/products/residential/voice/smcd3gnv/

  If the modem cannot be filled, then see if the modem has a DMZ option and enter the IP address of the router gets the modem and put it in the DMZ modems. Don't forget to disable all other filters and firewalls on the ISP modem.

  Configure the router to 6350 for release of Port Range:

  https://community.Linksys.com/T5/wireless-routers/open-NAT-problems-with-Xbox-one/TD-p/944929/page/2

  Configure an IP address for the xbox to 192.168.1.199 on the router, and then reboot the router.

  Performs a Factorty network setting reset on the xbox. Turn the xbox off then back on NAT status then chk. You should get OPEN, but if the ISP modem any treatment then you may see moderate...

• How can I change the base station Airport of NAT mode?

  I'm trying to set up an Airport base station and stuck because I have the following message is displayed, but no idea how do what he asks...

  Status is showing as Double NAT and then asking me to move on to the base station in bridge DHCP/NAT mode.

  But where do I do this?

  Thank you

  It can be difficult to get the router to bridge sometimes... but if all goes well... Click on the airport icon in airport utility and then click on edit.

  

  Go to the network tab and change DHCP and NAT to bridge.

  

  Click Update at the bottom of the page... Then, everything should be good.

  If you are having problems follow these steps.

  Reset factory airport and then do a manual installation. I recommend that you connect with ethernet which is much more reliable, but your MBPr is not the most important network port that exists... Although there is a bolt of lightning at low cost for the ethernet card.

• Problems of NAT for Xbox a Live, AC1900 Smart WiFi router model # R7000

  I can't get NAT open for my Xbox One, it is set to moderate right now. I tried to turn NAT, filtering to open, address reservation, go wireless Ethernet, port forwarding / port triggering TCP/UDP 3074.

  Any help would be appreciated

  Yes, that's all. So, your ISP is NATing your traffic. Your situation is similar to the guy with the WiMAX. I went and found this thread.
  https://community.NETGEAR.com/T5/Nighthawk-WiFi-routers/NIghtHawk-r7000-PS4-NAT-type-strict-3-issues...

  This guy had to call his ISP and ended up paying for an address public IP NAT problems. You will need to contact your ISP and either ask a public IP address, or ask them how to configure their gateway port forwarding. Read the other thread.

• menu bar popup not working if the focus is on the control of the chain

  Dear all,

  I wonder if this is the behavior expected or if I'm doing something wrong:

  On a Panel, I have a control of the chain; on double click, I opened a file selection box to select a file, then the file name on this control of the chain. After this action, this string is the active control, indicated by the gray frame.

  I also have a menu with some defined keyboard shortcuts bar for example F2. It seems that F2 is not functional, long as the focus is on the control of the chain. It's embarrassing because the typical user action is selects a file and then pressing on Fx. To resolve this problem, the user should click somewhere on the Panel to move the focus to another control. Of course this could be done programmatically, but the extra effort is not to say necessary for controls ring or digital controls. Also in digital controls, I can change the numbers, but even if a digital control is the active control due to the edition of the F2 value works immediately.

  Help is appreciated.

  Thank you

  Wolfgang

  I think what is happening here is that left double click is also used to highlight the text. So when you trigger the EVENT_LEFT_DOUBLE_CLICK, you're placing the text in the control of the chain and then also accentuating. It seems to be behaving strangely when the two of them occurs at the same time because of the order of the events. You can see that the mouse around when, returning from the file select popup causes the region highlighting to drag over the text. In this highlight mode, you cannot use the shortcuts for the menu. I was able to solve this problem by swallowing the EVENT_LEFT_DOUBLE_CLICK after you set the value of the control.