Routing between VLANS in one direction

Similar Questions

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• RV180W ping hostname between VLAN & different subnets

  Hello

  I had a RV180w with 1.0.3.10 closes. According to the name of position, I'm not able to resolve host names between different VLANS which affected to different subnets, for example, allows said I have the following hosts:

  CASA:

  192.168.241.100/25 (wired - VLAN 1)

  Router: 192.168.241.1

  DNS: 192.168.241.1

  XBMC: 192.168.242.100/25 (Wi - FI - VLAN 2)

  Router: 192.168.242.1

  DNS: 192.168.242.1

  If I try to ping from two sources to one of the two destinations, the only one I get is a message 'impossible '.

  Authorized additional information routing between vlans & proxy DNS and if I try to look at the hostname under the 'nslookup' command, I could not resolve the host name, but if I do a "ping - a 192.168.241.100 ' it is said ' response from CASA (192.168.241.100) blah blah blah."

  So what I'm missing here?

  Hi Bruno, you can usually solve different subnet host name because the host does not know the subnet that treats it as a security measure.

  Disable the firewall feature on your computers and which must fix, otherwise you will probably have to change the lmhost files.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Routing between two VLANs on a switch in series SG300

  I've seen a lot of messages from people with problems of traffic between the two routing VLANS with some complex examples.  Can someone show a simple example for a SG300 switch (in layer 3 mode) to set up the two VLAN and send the traffic between VLANS without an external router?

  VLAN1 10.10.10.0

  VLAN2 10.10.20.0

  I tried to do through the UI and can't seem to make it work.  It seems that it must be very simple, so maybe I'm missing something in the GUI.

  Hi Chris,

  I did 5 minutes of recording that showed how I configured the two VLAN on my SG300 switch and layer 3-switched between the VLANS.

  You have no trouble getting to the GUI, so you will have no difficulty to setup in a few minutes...

  • Be sure to use the latest version of the SG300 package, with a bearable CLI.
  • to save your changes to the configuration at the end of the process.
  • the IP addresses that you create will be the address of default gateway for PC hosts on VLANs specified.
  • Recording can be interrupted at any time to perform configuration operations.

  Recording is now available on the website of the WebEx service. Click on the link below to read:

  https://Cisco.WebEx.com/ciscosales/LSR.php?at=PB&SP=MC&rID=55688352&RKEY=05e1fc5fff0d05da

  Configuration of VLAN

  Monday, October 24, 2011 11:02 New York time

  5 minutes

  Have fun

  Best regards, Dave

• RV110W VLAN routing between

  Hello

  I have a NAS I want to place on a VLAN separate from my the rest of my network using the rv110w. The rest of the network would still require a connection to the new VLAN.

  The router has currently only the default value as 1 VLANS configured.

  How to achieve this? I know how to create the VLAN, but am not sure how to assign memberships to the port.

  Thank you!

  HI Kirk,

  Thank you for posting. After you create the new VLAN, assign it to the port you want like "Untagged." Then go to the box to activate routing Inter-VLAN networking-> routing and at the bottom of the check of the page.

• Director of the laboratory - routing and VLAN

  Hey,.

  So we are currently setting up Lab Manager in our environment, the environment in which we are setting up is a replica of our production environment. In the LABORATORY, we use 13 VIRTUAL networks.

  I use Vyatta to route between the VLANS right now, but we are running into a problem now, 13 VLAN... 3 more that it has configurable s NIC on a virtual machine.

  Aside from trying to convince everyone that we don't need of 13 VIRTUAL networks in a lab environment, are there other possible solutions or have you guys seen or been around something like this configuration before?

  (I've been throwing around the idea of setting up two VM running Vyatta and creation of a separate network who share the two interfaces on one VLAN from the 14th and then distribute the network load between two virtual machines but it's even more work that manually configure an instance of Vyatta in LM whenever someone wants a new workspace to test.)

  What do you think guys?

  I would say that you need to trim more work for yourself in the long term.   If you want a "real" picture of your lab and prod, you can see either plan b of your presentation above and buy physical passes capable of vlan trunking. Not much, we can hope for until Vmware gets beyond the limit of 10 - nic that seems more promising with all support for 10gbe cards now.  Some department stores I've seen can pull off a true mirror of their production environment as they can in their laboratory.  With virtualization, it makes it much easier to achieve.  I hope one day, we can be their one day ;-).

  See you soon,.

  Chad King

  VCP-410. Server +.

  Twitter: http://twitter.com/cwjking

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• Problem with routing inter - VLAN... How to solve it?

  Hi all.

  I have a WRVS4400N in my office to have a VPN with our main customer and also to manage the entire network of small size.

  In two weeks, more or less we will change our office somewhere else, merge two in one.

  At its new location, we will have two different ADSL connections, and we will keep our separate LAN to the other LAN.

  The goal is to interconnect the two local networks in order to 'see' the machines on one local network to another, but keep the two local networks with their current configuration, subnet, etc..

  To achieve this, I created a new VLAN on the router and I have attached only port4 to this VLAN.

  

  

  As you can see, VLAN main has its own/24 subnet (10.148.145.0/24) and dhcp enabled (for addresses on my LAN) while the new VIRTUAL local network has its own 24 subnet too (10.0.0.0/24) but with the disabled dhcp (is a different LAN with its own DHCP server).

  

  

  

  

  VLAN 1 use ports 1-3 and VLAN 2 use the single port 4.

  Of course, I enabled routing inter - VLAN:

  

  To emulate the future scenario, I connected a router with an Internet port 4 with IP:10.0.0.2, and I therefore two different local networks.

  Well, the reality is this:

  -From my PC connected to the VLAN1 I have an IP address (assigned by my Cisco) and I see all my VLAN and I see 10.0.0.1 too (IP of the router on VLAN2), but I don't see any more (pings to 10.0.0.2 didn't answer). I can access Cisco router to 10.0.0.1 and 10.148.145.97.

  -My PC connected to the VLAN2 I have an IP address (assigned by the other router on 10.0.0.2), I see only my VLAN (10.0.0.0/24 IPs). I can access only Cisco router to 10.0.0.1.

  How can I do to enable these two VLANS to 'see' each other?

  How can I control access to the WAN port? I don't want machines to VLAN2 accessing internet through our router.

  Thank you and best regards!

  Hello Francisco,.

  In router mode gateway mode switch will turn off the NAT on the router. Which will allow to the vlan 2 does not to get out to the internet but also vlan 1 and which is not what you want. You may be able to create access rules and deny rules for not being able to get out of the internet... may create some default of the rules of the road as 0.0.0.0. Also, you may be able to create internet air to stop a certain subnet that it is able to get out of the internet as well.

  Regarding the VLAN talk to each other, everything looks good, routing inter - vlan, it is allowing the two VLAN to talk to each other and which is activated. What your default gateways are installed on devices you are testing? As long as default gateways on your PC and devices are pointing to the routers ip/gateway address, you should be good to go at this point.

  VLAN 1: default gateway should be 10.148.145.97

  VLAN 2: default gateway must be 10.0.0.1

  Other than that everything seems to be implemented correctly based on the images. The VLANs that you put in place on the ports are correct.

  Let me know your devices are configured on the rise and will go from there.

  Hope this helps,

  Thank you

  Clayton Sill

• Flow ip VPN in one direction

  Hello

  I have a VPN from Site to Site that works finein one direction, distance to the Center, i.e. it goes upward, using VNC to connect remotely to Central or vice-versa works, on the back (Central remotely) No and ping is not two-way.

  IMHO, it would take something lack on the central site, because if I ping from central lan to lan remote or vice versa asa central says:

  No group of translation found for icmp src, dst domestic: domestic IP_ON_CENTRAL_LAN: IP_ON_REMOTE_LAN (type 8, code 0)

  Distance is on nat0, i.e. I

  IP LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended inside_nat0_outbound

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allow icmp LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0

  IP LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended outside_1_cryptomap

  outside_1_cryptomap list extended access allow icmp LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 0 inside_nat0_outbound list of outdoor access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  outside_map game 1 card crypto peer REMOTE_PUBLIC_IP

  On the remote control (a pix 501), I have:

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow

  access-list allowed inside_outbound_nat0_acl icmp LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0

  outside_cryptomap_20 LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow

  access-list allowed outside_cryptomap_20 icmp LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl

  outside_map 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto outside_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_20

  card crypto outside_map 20 game peers CENTRAL_PUBLIC_IP

  outside_map card crypto 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  No group of translation found for icmp src, dst domestic: domestic IP_ON_CENTRAL_LAN: IP_ON_REMOTE_LAN (type 8, code 0)

  something is wrong with the routing on Central

• Problem with DHCP broadcast between VLAN

  Hello

  I trying to solve the lab that I set up, I have a problem with broadcast between VLANS with my DHCP. I looked around the vmware community to find my answer, but I did not who is right why I post here!

  So here's my situation :

  • ESX with 2 race of VM:
    • An R2 of 2012 Windows running a DHCP server with a configured scope
      • This virtual machine is assigned to the vmnic4 with the port VLAN 100 group
    • A Windows 7, which I use as a customer
      • This virtual machine is assigned to the vmnic4 with the port VLAN 110 group
  • Switch Cisco with a simple configuration:

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description LINK FOR ESX

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport nonegotiate

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  Description OF LINK ROUTER

  switchport mode trunk

  • Configuration of the Cisco "router on the stick:

  interface FastEthernet0/0.100

  encapsulation dot1q 100

  10.1.1.254 IP address 255.255.255.0

  interface FastEthernet0/0,110

  encapsulation dot1q 110

  IP 10.1.2.254 255.255.255.0

  IP helper 10.1.1.0

  
  

  The resolution of the problems that I did:

  • Affecting the client static IP and that both virtual machine can ping each other
  • Moving from the client to the same VLAN as DHCP server, and the DHCP server is to give the client an IP address.
  • Sniffing the packet:
    • I can see the client DHCPDiscover
    • I can see the router with the command "debug ip dhcp server packet" package passed on the 10.1.1.0.
    • I am not able to see the packets from the router to DHCP perspective

  That's why I guess miss me something ESX configuration.

  Thanks in advance for reading this post!

  
  

  PS: I've linked a vswitch configuration screenshot
  

  I think that you have configured an incorrect address of IP support, take a look at the following line:

  IP helper 10.1.1.0

  
  

  Your DCHP server is really 10.1.1.0? I think not, since 10.1.1.0 corresponds to the ID of the network 10.1.1.0/24 network.
  

• Routing between 2 vswitches

  Hello

  In my lab at home, I have the following configuration:

  vSwitch0 - physical adapter connected to the router (192.168.1.x)

  vSwitch1 - no physical (10.0.0.x) cards

  All my VM to sit on vSwitch1. I had to do it this way to get a PXE boot works fine in my lab.

  My problem is that I can't connect to one of my machines on vswitch1 my 192.168.1 network.

  What is the best way to be able to do this? I know that I could probably hold a windows in there server and RRAS only, but it would be a waste of resources. Is there an easier way?

  Hello

  VSwitches of VMware are autonomous entities that do not allow for Stackable Switch. In order to connect two vSwitches you need to use a lightweight virtual machine that acts as a firewall/router. There are several that you can choose as Vyatta, Smoothwall, IPCop, etc..

  Or use your idea RRAS.

  The device, which he is never, has 2 vNIC, each connected to one of the vSwitches in use. I.e.

  A vSwitch => Portgroup A-online [vNIC A - VM - vNIC B]<=Portgroup><=vSwitch>

  The virtual machine becomes the router between the switches.

  Best regards

  Edward L. Haletky

  Host communities, VMware vExpert,

  Author: VMware vSphere and Virtual Infrastructure Security,VMware ESX and ESXi in the 2nd business edition

  Podcast: the Podcast for security virtualization of resources: the virtual virtualization library

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB

• My Microsoft Wireless Mouse 5000 new scrolls only in one direction in Quicken. This seems to be the only program with problems. All the answers?

  My Microsoft Wireless Mouse 5000 new scrolls only in one direction in Quicken.  This seems to be the only program with problems. All the answers?

  Hi retiredinflorida,

  Welcome to Microsoft Vista answers Forum!
   
  It is a known issue using IntelliPoint from Microsoft and Quicken software drivers.  Both parties are aware of the problem and as soon as a hotfix or patch for this problem is available it will be displayed on the Quicken Web site so check with their website on a regular basis.
   
  However, if the Microsoft Wireless Mouse 5000 problems in other applications, you can check the links below.

  The Microsoft wireless mouse does not work as expected if:

  You may want to consider this link to fix the problem: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb; EN-US; 838398

  In the case want ot uninstall and reinstall the mouse drivrs use this link: http://www.microsoft.com/hardware/windows7/support.mspx

  Hope this information is useful.
  Let me know if it worked.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Aziz Nadeem - Microsoft technical support.
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum
  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/answersfeedback/threads/ and let us know
  what you think

• Can I connect my HP4625 all in one directly on my ipad/iphone without using a wifi network. ?

  Can I connect my HP4625 all in one directly on my ipad/iphone without using a wifi network. ?

  Hi xxtopgunxx,

  Welcome to the HP Support forums.  I understand you want to print from your devices Apple to your printer Deskjet Ink Advantage 4625 without the printer is connected to a wireless network.

  It is possible that we can get the printer to disseminate its own network. Please note that the network will broadcast the printer will not have access to the internet.  Please follow the steps below:

  • On the front panel of the printer, please press the wireless button
  • By using the buttons on the right, highlight and select wireless settings
  • Highlight and select Restore Defaults
  • Select Yes. A message appears indicating that the default values of the network have been restored
  • Open your application settings on your Apple device, please
  • Please click on wifi and choose the network that starts with "HP-SETUP.  This should connect to your Apple device to the printer
  • Now you should be able to print using the 'Action' icon.  If there is not a print option when you press the action icon following all guidelines for Apple AirPrint

  If you go to print and your Apple device does not see the network, you will need to follow the procedure again. It should be at least 60 minutes before the HP - Setup network ceased broadcasting.

• Wheel scroll/zoom only in one direction in some programs

  When I use a scroll wheel (external or optical mouse or laptop touchpad scroll wheel) on my laptop (with Windows Vista), but scrolls or zooms in one direction in some programs. For example, when I scroll in any direction in Google Earth or AutoCAD, it zoomed in only (should zoom out when wheel downwards). In IE, the wheel works correctly. In Word, it does not at all. I saw online that others have had this problem with Vista, but I can't find a solution. How can I solve this problem and get the roulette wheel or the touchpad works properly?

  Hello
  I would like to start by installing the latest version of the software/drivers for you devices.

  I noticed a strange behavior in Chrome with my scrolling as well. It scrolls side by side, however I move the steering wheel (4 directions). And only the page up and down if I'm on top of the sidebar. It is a problem with Chrome... not your mouse.
  Most of the maps online zoom only, they do not go side by side... regardless of the browser.
  Word and other applications are a different floor. They must act as expected. This seems to indicate that your driver does not work properly. First try.

  (Note also that some older devices can be is no longer supported.) Mark <> Microsoft Partner