RV110W VLAN routing between

Similar Questions

• RV110W inter-VLAN-routing is not possible

  In Cisco RV110W, I set up 2 VLANS, a 192.168.1.xxx (Green Net) and the second with only a fixed address 192.168.2.100 192.168.2.xxx (Server), which is configured in the DMZ area. I enabled in Cisco "inter-VLAN-Routing", described "routing between separate VLANs on Cisco RV110W" I can Ping the server in a direktion, the other I got an error. It is just expected and ok! All other abilities expected work well!

  Now, I want to see the Green network server. (firewall on the server is off)

  I configured the network/router with exactly the values of the index and has been an error: "destination LAN IP may not be the same as the router's IP subnet.

  Sorry, I don't understand this. Can anyone help?

  Thank you in anticipation

  Anton

  

  If I understand correctly, you have a second vlan, 192.168.2.x. The RV110W is a member of this subnet so that's why we do not have a static route for something that the router knows that she welcomes this subnet.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• RVS4000 routing between VLAN static?

  Hello

  I was wondering if the RVS4000 allows a static routing between the VLANS.  I would like to have three VLANS, one for my cable system, one for my wireless network and one for my print server.  I want the two VLAN Wi - Fi and to be able to get to the virtual LAN print server, but do not want the Wi - Fi and VLAN to react reciprocally.  Is it possible to put up with this router without the need of additional routers or a layer 3 switch.  Thanks in advance for any advice that anyone can give.

  By default, the VLAN is entirely routed. You do not have to configure routing between VLANs. What to put in place the filter. You must filter the traffic, which you don't want to pass between the VLANS. Set up the ACL according to the needs.

• Connect 6224 VLAN routing and management VLAN

  Happy holidays all the world-

  I read several posts here and elsewhere on the inability of the 6224 to deliver its own management interface. OK, enough, I get it. But what I don't understand is a practical solution to what seems to be a huge problem if you want to use the network to connect to the device to manage (instead of the serial console port).

  Let's say I want to have three networks A, B, and C on the 6224 and configure it to route between any combination of them. Let's call them VLANS 1, 2, and 3. Three ethernet cables will connect to three ports on the 6224. for the network A, b and C. Let's just ignore shifts and redundant connections to do this.

  The management VLAN can not be assigned to one of these networks, right? He said in the documentation, and it turns out if you try to do it on the configuration of the switch. It doesn't let you do.

  So, how do you reach the 6224 for management? Create a fourth network, VLAN 4? This seems to be the general theme of the answers to questions like that, but how do you reach this seemingly isolated network? By definition, it cannot be routed. Any computer that you normally use on A, B or C, can not reach D.

  So what then? A dedicated computer for D who cannot reach the other thing than the switch management port? What about another completely separate router (I have a Cisco ASA with some ports to spare, or a hint of irony, an another 6224!) to provide a connection between D and a networks normally used? This is crazy.

  Of course, missing me something here. I can't believe that the answer is, 'If you enable routing, the management interface is essentially unusable"but that's what it looks like, from my possibly twisted point of view. I want to have my laptop computer and any other computer, sitting on a network that can be put to rout by the 6224, and for that same laptop also be able to reach this same 6224 management interface.

  Someone please help me understand this?

  Thank you

  Chris

  PS: I have an email address. It is almost unique on the entire planet. I use it to connect to this forum. But Dell, like so many others, insists on ignoring these facts and let me create an another unique identifier while playing a game of 20 questions. That's why my remarkably stupid random username.

  Thanks again, and I hope that someone gets at least a good laugh over this.

  Vlan management can be considered as a port OOB. If the intention is that it be separated from the rest of the traffic and on its own dedicated network. However, you are not limited to manage the switch through just the interface vlan management. Each VLAN with an IP address can be used by customers in this vlan to manage the switch.

  For example, if you assign a VLAN 2 address and ip 192.168.2.1. Customers in VLAN 2 with and the 192.168.2.x subnet ip address can access 192.168.2.1 to manage the switch, while being able to communicate with clients in other VLANs.

  I hope this helps some, let me know if you need help on your config, or to specify anything.

  Thank you

• Catalyst 6500 Inter-VLAN routing

  I have a Cisco 6500 switch and I have a question about routing inter - vlan and the command "IP ROUTING".  I use dial-up virtual interfaces (I.e. int vlan 2, int vlan 3, etc.), but I noticed that I don't have the IP ROUTING enabled on my switch but I can route properly between the VLANS.  I have even a little ports that I have configured with the command "no switchport" and I assigned an IP address to these ports.  On routed ports, there is another switch on the other side configured with an IP address and I am able to ping and route traffic to the other network.

  I did some research on this and all the documentation I am able to find talk of how you must enable IP ROUTING to route between the VLANS.  I guess that this should only be done if you go to the road to other not directly connected networks.

  http://www.ccnpguide.com/CCNP-switch-642-813-inter-VLAN-routing/

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/lanswitch/configuration/12-2Sx/lsw-12-2Sx-book/lsw-VLAN-cfg-RTG.html#GUID-F5181D47-F44E-4F01-92E4-9132097BA333

  Can someone clarify this for me?

  For the 6500 Series, IP routing is enabled by default, that so all VLAN can communicate with each other.  You don't need to activate as you do for other switches (IE 3560, 3750, 3850, etc...)

  HTH

• Want to use internet to share WRV210 router between two LANs

  Hello

  I have the following scenario:

  A LAN has access to internet via ADSL through a Fortigate 50B (192.168.100.0)

  A new LAN (different segment) that should have access to the internet. (192.168.102.0)

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves.

  We have a WRV210 router between two LANs (192.168.100.0 WAN, 192.168.102.0 on LAN) configured in router mode.

  Resources work very well, but internet does not work.

  We receive answers internet addresses on 192.168.102.0 ping and tracert works very well, but we cannot navigate or connect to Skype, msn msg, etc..

  We made on fortigate 50B routes this way:

  192.168.102.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.100.102 internal

  192.168.100.102 is an address WAN WRV210

  We tried the gateway mode and internet works fine on 192.168.102.0, but 192.168.100.0 cannot contact 192.168.102.0 resources (obviously)

  What can be wrong in case of ping and tracert works very well, but nothing else works?

  Hi Willy,.

  You need the WRV210 in not the router mode gateway mode.

  Gateway mode active Stateful inspection, which will address translation from private to public IP addresses and NAT....

  "But I think that the VLAN on the router segments members to talk to other members on the other vlan, so your comment.

  Two local networks need to have shared access resources among themselves. "creates a problem.

  .

  A community previous publication says "with Port Based VLAN on the WRV210, there is no VLAN tagging and so on." It's more like say port 1 not to talk to port 2, because they are on separate physically designated VLAN (even if on the same subnet) and it is far as it goes. But with your configuration you want also to have the 2nd SSID do not talk to any wired client based on the RVS4000 as well? If so, this facility would not work because all wireless clients would be able to talk to cable customers and vice versa. But if you primary concern is simply to prevent the SSID 1 speaking with 2 SSID, it's doable in the page VLAN for the WRV210.

  So if you want the WRV210 to allow switching between the VLAN port basis, it won't work the way it is set up now...

  If you want to restrict access between IP hosts, I suggest using the list feature to access a managed switch that focuses on the PC or servers.  A switch may be as a series of 200 or 300 small businesses switch, see URL below...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10898/prod_models_comparison.html

  But then allow all ports to be a member of the VLAN by default.  I hope that I read your question correctly

  Best regards, Dave

• RVS4000 VLAN routing

  The RVS4000 supports 4 VLANS active and has an element of configuration to enable routing between VLANs.  To accomplish this (routing between VLAN), we would need independent interface IP addresses for each VLAN participant.  I have not found how to configure the IP interface addresses.

  (1) does actually perform functions of routing (i.e. L3 router) between 4 VLANs (assuming that 4 are active) or does only routing between the single WAN port and one LAN subnet?

  (2) assuming that it actually performs routing between VLANS, how can I specify the interface addresses?

  (3) if it does not routing, which is the purpose of allow routing between VLAN box?

  (4) even once if it does not really provide routing, which product is better road between 4 VLANs (NAT not required).

  After the creation of VLANs, you can go to the page where the DHCP server settings are configured to specify the IP subnet for each VLAN.

• PowerConnect 8024F doesn't have a vlan routing

  My Department recently bought a PC8024F (F/W 5.1.2.3) which will VLAN routing. From what I can tell the 8024F is supposed to have VLAN routing but this one is not.

  Is there something that miss me, a special version of the F/W or anything that prevents this 8024F to have this feature? VLAN routing is not listed in the web menu and is not recognised when entered the interface vlan via CLI.

  Any suggestions or advice is greatly appreciated!

  To activate routing LAN VIRTUAL you make sure each VLAN has an IP address assigned to them.

  # interface vlan 4

  # 192.168.4.1 ip address 255.255.255.0

  Customers will have a default gateway of the VLAN they are placed in. Customers in VLAN 4 would be a default gateway of 192.168.4.1.

  Then, throughout the world run the following command:

  #ip Routing

  Who should get things working for you. Page 895 has some other details/information about IP routing.

  http://bit.LY/1IrNIUy

  Thank you

• PowerConnect 3548P Inter VLAN routing

  Hello

  I need to help the flow of traffic to and from our new voice VLAN 3. Here is our first series:

  3548P

  VLAN 1 (data) is 10.0.0.85/24

  VLAN 3 (voice) is 10.0.3.9/24

  The default gateway of our firewall is 10.0.0.254. Would it be the GW I set up for the switch? I am completely confused!

  We also have an another Powerconnect 5524P we want to connect to and route traffic as well. Do we need to add 3 VLAN in there too? If so, I wouldn't need to add a VLAN 3 management interface except perhaps default VLAN 1 correct?

  I guess my question is, what other options do I need to enable to do everything 'talk '? I should mention that we also have a Watchguard X550e. I have to configure something there?

  If you need more information or background, I can certainly provide.

  Thank you!

  Thanks for the update, good to hear VLAN routing works.

  Try to set the default gateway on the switch. You will use the IP address of the firewall.

  Example:

  Console (config) #ip - default gateway (IP address of firewall)

  If this does not work, then add a static route on the switch that directs traffic on the firewall.

  console (config) #ip 0.0.0.0 route 0.0.0.0 (IP address of firewall)

• RV180 router: impossible to get Inter-VLAN routing to work.

  I've been hit in this now for two days and just can't get Inter-VLAN routing to work on this router.

  Here is the place is:.

  Updated to the latest firmware of Cisco (1.0.1.9).
  From default settings, I added 2 VLAN as follows:

  VLAN (id = 1) default: dhcpmode = port IP=192.168.1.1/24 from server 1
  VLAN vlan2 (id = 2): dhcpmode = port IP=192.168.2.1/24 from Server 2
  VLAN vlan3 (id = 3): dhcpmode = port IP=192.168.3.1/24 Server 3

  (without link)
  WAN port
  |
  Routing/NAT
  |
  --------------------------------------
  VLAN ip 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 192.168.3.1
  name of VLAN by default vlan2, vlan3
  VLAN id ID = 1 ID = 2 ID = 3
  Inter-VLAN only routing Yes Yes
  Excluded excluded unidentified 1 port
  2 excluded excluded Untagged port
  Port 3 unmarked excluded except
  Port 4 (not interest) without excluded tag excluded
  ---------      --------     --------
  1 2 3 Port port
  |              |            |
  AdminPC PC3 PC2
  192.168.2.191 192.168.3.181

  PC2 is assigned an IP address of 192.168.2.191 (DGW = 192.168.2.1) - OK
  PC3 is assigned an IP address of 192.168.3.181 (DGW = 192.168.3.1) - OK

  (IP 192.168.2.191) PC2 can ping 192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1 - OK
  (IP 192.168.3.181) PC3 can ping 192.168.3.1 and 192.168.2.1 - OK

  BUT...
  PC2 cannot ping PC3 - don't DO NOT WORK
  PC3 can not ping PC2 - don't DO NOT WORK

  (does not work in gateway and router Mode)

  CAN SOMEONE HELP ME UNDERSTAND WHY?

  Your help is very appreciated.

  I bought this unit specifically because she supported routing inter - VLAN!

  Vlaminck

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Support information:

  Screenshots:
  Belonging to a VLAN:
  VLAN ID Description Inter VLAN device Port 1 Port 2 Port 3 Port 4
  Routing Mgment
  1 default disabled enabled unmarked excluded excluded unlabeled
  2 active active VLAN2 excluded unmarked excluded excluded
  Unmarked 3 VLAN3 active active excluded excluded excluded

  Several subnets VLAN:
  VLAN ID IP address Subnet Mask DHCP DNS Proxy Mode status
  1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server enabled
  2 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server enabled
  3 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server enabled

  Routing table (Bridge Mode)

  Destination Gateway Genmask Metric Ref use Interface Type flags
  127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 1 0 0 static lo upward, gateway, host
  192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 dynamic bdg3 to the TOP
  192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 dynamic bdg2 upward
  192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0 0 static bdg1 to the TOP
  192.168.1.0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 1 0 0 static bdg1 upward, gateway
  127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 0 0 0 lo dynamic

  Routing table (router Mode)

  (Ditto)

  Hello

  It's not because the pings are allowed on the same subnet that they come from a different subnet.

  You probably have a firewall problem windows software because that by default, it removes a different subnet icmp echoes.

  Concerning

  Alain

  Remember messages useful rate.

• Inter vlan routing on a Cisco SF 300-24 port switch only no internet except when scanning with wireshark

  Hello

  I'm get inter vlan routing to work on a 300-24 ports switch DF.    I have a network of business existing on 192.168.111.0 and want to create a vlan on 192.168.1.1 which can talk to 192.168.111.0.    I activated the layer 3 routing on the switch through the console and also provided ip routing commands. I have the following VIRTUAL networks:

  Vlan1 - default 192.168.111.0

  VLAN2 - 192.168.1.0

  I turned on DNS and provided my two servers DNS 192.168.111.82 & 192.168.111.212.

  I updated the VLAN1 interface 192.168.111.217 and VLAN2 interface 192.168.1.1.

  The FE1 - FE15 ports are access ports and assigned to VLAN1 (unidentified)

  FE16 - FE24 ports are access ports and assigned to VLAN2 (unidentified)

  I put a default route for the switch to 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.111.254 (router Draytek 2600). I have connected a computer (A) at the port of VLAN1 FE3 and a computer (B) to VLAN2 FE16 port.   I put its IP address and computer default gateway has to 192.168.111.217 to 192.168.111.94.    I updated computer B default gateway 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 IP.

  Computer A has access to the Mdaemon Server files via the network grows but no internet (cannot ping google) and can ping computer B and RDP on computer B.

  Computer B can ping computer A and RDP on A computer but do not have access to the company network i.e. MDaemon, file server etc.   It can also access the internet.

  The console I can ping www.google.co.uk and all the ip addresses in the network of the company i.e. 192.168.111.82 (DNS server).   I do not understand what I am doing wrong and have been banging my head for staretd a few days a new job and desperately need to work so any help would be greatly appreciated

  If I have computer scanner a wireshark wirh internet starts working wheird!

  Show the configuration below:

  switch7c0a71 #show run

  database of VLAN

  VLAN 2

  output

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00d01e Pingtel_phone___

  VLAN voice Yes-table add Polycom/Veritel_phone___ 00e075

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___

  interface vlan 2

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  output

  interface vlan 1

  IP 192.168.111.217 255.255.255.0

  output

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.111.254

  interface vlan 1

  no ip address dhcp

  output

  Hello interface range vlan 1

  hostname switch7c0a71

  No complexity of passwords allow

  No server snmp Server

  interface fastethernet1

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet2

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet3

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet4

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet5

  switchport mode access

  output

  fastethernet6 interface

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet7

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet8

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet9

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet10

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet11

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet12

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet13

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet14

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet15

  switchport mode access

  output

  interface fastethernet16

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet17

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet18

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet19

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet20

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet21

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet22

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet23

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface fastethernet24

  switchport mode general

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 2 unidentified

  output

  interface vlan 2

  name of development

  output

  Hi Richard,

  43 - permit Protocol: any / all

  42 - Protocol deny EVERYTHING 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255-> to 192.168.111.0 0.0.0.255

  41 - Protocol to deny ALL 192.168.111.0 0.0.0.255-> to 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255

  40 allow the RDP Protocol TO ALL

  etc.

  To block everything, including MSSQL, with the exception of the RDP and other ports that you defined above.  The other defined are simply not the RDP Protocol and service work?

  Richard, do note useful messages and identify the right answers.

  Best,

  David

• Routing between vApps in the same ORG

  Am I right in understanding that the only way to route between vApps in the ORG even is manually by creating static routes?

  I have the static routing options under VAPP networks but not under ORG networks. The documentation says that there should be a static routing tab, but the single tab I have is DHCP. Y at - it a step that I missed somewhere?

  Thank you!!

  Ahh ok, if its isolated, you can't do that sort of thing.  Precisely, the docs say you can with a net org of this type?

• VCD 5.1 routing between VCC-org-network

  Hello

  I want to route between two vapps in the Organization of two different vdc network. I found information on the guide of 5.1 admin vcloud, but it is not very clear on the external ip address of the network of the Organization of vdc.

  Example from vcloud 5.1 administration guide:

  External IP address of the router network network name specification
  VAPP 1 network 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.0.100
  VAPP 2 Network 192.168.11.0/24 192.168.10.100
  Org vDC 1 network 192.168.0.0/24 10.112.205.101
  Org VDC 2 network 192.168.10.0/24 10.112.205.100

  Where can I find the addresses 10.112.205.100 and 101?

  Thank you

  Dominic

  Gateway, properties, configure the IP settings

  or gateway, external IP allocations

• Routing between 2 vswitches

  Hello

  In my lab at home, I have the following configuration:

  vSwitch0 - physical adapter connected to the router (192.168.1.x)

  vSwitch1 - no physical (10.0.0.x) cards

  All my VM to sit on vSwitch1. I had to do it this way to get a PXE boot works fine in my lab.

  My problem is that I can't connect to one of my machines on vswitch1 my 192.168.1 network.

  What is the best way to be able to do this? I know that I could probably hold a windows in there server and RRAS only, but it would be a waste of resources. Is there an easier way?

  Hello

  VSwitches of VMware are autonomous entities that do not allow for Stackable Switch. In order to connect two vSwitches you need to use a lightweight virtual machine that acts as a firewall/router. There are several that you can choose as Vyatta, Smoothwall, IPCop, etc..

  Or use your idea RRAS.

  The device, which he is never, has 2 vNIC, each connected to one of the vSwitches in use. I.e.

  A vSwitch => Portgroup A-online [vNIC A - VM - vNIC B]<=Portgroup><=vSwitch>

  The virtual machine becomes the router between the switches.

  Best regards

  Edward L. Haletky

  Host communities, VMware vExpert,

  Author: VMware vSphere and Virtual Infrastructure Security,VMware ESX and ESXi in the 2nd business edition

  Podcast: the Podcast for security virtualization of resources: the virtual virtualization library

• Routing between two network cards

  I have 8 fiber switches that are configured to use a private network for management.

  The subnet is 192.168.8.0/24.

  I have a W2K3 (SERVER A) server with two NICS, a NIC (192.168.8.1) is attached to

  the 192.168.8.0 subnet and the other (192.168.100.14) NETWORK adapter is attached to the subnet 192.168.100.0/24.

  I put up two persistent routes of road between these NICS using the following commands:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  I have an other W2K3 server (SERVER B) with a single NETWORK (192.168.100.12) card that must be able

  to connect with the fiber switches via tcp/ip. Packets should be routed to this server.

  On that I put in place a permanent route:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Everything works very well.

  (Assumes that the SERVER-A and SERVER B are now turned off)

  I'm trying to reproduce this on my VMware ESX Server 3.5upd3.

  ESX server has two NICS, one attached to each of the subnets. I create a virtual machine to replace SERVER-a

  with the same number of network cards and the same IP addresses.

  I then create routes as follows:

  Pei route add 192.168.8.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.14

  Pei route add 192.168.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.8.1

  PROBLEM: as soon as I add the second route I can no longer ping any server on the 192.168.100.0 subnet.

  This also causes connections to last very long.

  Do I need to implement routing between network adapters ESX scale to make this work?

  If so maybe want the command look like? If not, what could be my problem?

  Thank you for the helpful answers

  If you want to configure your machine as a router, you will need to notify the router is the next hop.  Now, the next machine break is its own interfaces, which will not work.  And since you are running some sort of routing protocol, provide two solutions to exit the server is not a good idea, because he doesn't know that one to use.  It will use 1 for some and another for some.

  Do what you intend (or I think you intend), you must delete the static routes and choose a default route, which will be your next jump.  This should be another router in your environment.  Then, the other servers that you want to route via ServerA, ServerA interface on this segment would remind you.

  Hope that makes sense.

  -KjB