RV320 / 325 Dual WAN Question

Similar Questions

• lrt224 dual wan router

  Hi im new in dual wan configuration. Help, please.
  Here is my problem

  1 dynamic globe telecom primary WAN
  WAN static pldt 2 telecom
  Link failover mode

  1 router is connect to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin for wifi wireless
  1 cctv dvr connected to port 9000 webport lrt224 9100 with auto detection parameters parameters

  Now:
  Sometimes cctv camera released to public ip address when the wan2 switch but sometimes cannot show also
  All around, with 1 wan dynamic as primary

  Hi @engkanto.net,.

  I agree with the suggestions. It is best to connect the IP camera to one of the LRT224 router's Ethernet ports. Then you must configure the Port Forwarding or Port Address Translation If you have more than one camera using the same internal port.

  Thank you.

• RV082, Dual Wan, VPN + protocol bindings

  Hi all

  I have this kind of Setup and I can't figure out how to think this router.

  My Installer uses Dual Wan load balancing mode. I only need one VPN tunnel. High availability is my concern.

  Site 1 has fiber and Cable

  Site 2A cable and FTTN

  Each ISP provides a static IP

  VPN works very well in the event of failure. I am always disappointed that it works in the case where a single primary WAN breaks, but is not operational if primary WAN on Site 1 stops at the same time secondary Site WAN 2 stops. It is very rare but can happen.

  In any case, my problems are where I need binding protocol to ensure secure WEB (https, banking, portal provider) sessions.

  I bind, at the least, port 443 to my primary WAN. In this way, I can access the Web sites and keep me logged.

  So, if I browse a HTTPS across the VPN server, binding protocol always attempts to pass port 443 by the WAN1. He will not even consider the VPN as a valid route first.

  (Maybe) can problem I reduce Hop Count for Site 2 less than 35?     P.S. I replaced the addresses I don't think they are relevant.

  Destination IP Subnet mask Default gateway Number of hops Interface

  ADDR network WAN2 255.255.255.252 * 0 eth2 WAN1 network addr 255.255.255.248 * 0 eth1 Site 2 255.255.255.0 Site 1 fiber Gateway 35 eth1 Site 1 255.255.255.0 * 0 eth0 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 15 eth1 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 cable WAN2 40 eth2 by default 0.0.0.0 Site 1 fiber WAN1 40 eth1

  Thank you all,

  Bruno

  I would like to conclude this is a bug and requires further investigation. I wouldn't call it a limitation if it was my decision (not that I have so much importance in this regard)

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Dual WAN router and protocol binding

  Hello! I'm trying to find a dual WAN router with support VPN, which allow me to redirect part of the traffic to a specific port WAN and balancing of this specific traffic in the case of this WAN failure (the latter is preferred but is not entirely necessary) load.

  RV042/G could help me with this? In this case, allow redirection Protocol only? What port/ip forwarding? Or some sort of filtering of packets to redirect to specific WAN ports?

  Maybe I need another router in the conduct of business?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi Jose, RV0XX model (g) supports a protocol source LAN link to extended network destination set. It can be a host of high-end LAN or a single host LAN. It may be the customer service or all services. In the case of a failure of network SCOPE, all links in the Protocol are "ignored" and switch to the active WAN until normal operation is restored.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Tunnel VPN RV-042 for Dual WAN Failover backup function

  We have customers with dual WAN failover scenarios with site-to-site VPN tunnels.

  In the past, the VPN tunnel backup feature has been available in the RV-082.

  One of the new RV-042 firmware versions have the function of backup Tunnel VPN available?

  The feature is supported on the RV042 V3 hardware.

• IPSEC VPN on the dual WAN links

  Here's my situation. I have two identical sites ASA 5505 and each has the dual wan/ISP connection and are set to resume using the sla monitor followed. I would like to create a vpn between these two sites that remains active regardless of what ISP link is online. Just make two crytpo card statements10 and a 20 inside each of the asa to each of the other ASA STATIC PUBLIC IP? It works or cause problems?

  Configuration of SITE B

  card crypto Cox_Primary_map 10 corresponds to the address Cox_Primary_cryptomap_10

  crypto Cox_Primary_map 10 peer 72.X.X.X card game<== primary="" static="" isp="" at="" site="">

  10 Cox_Primary_map transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  card crypto Qwest_Backup_map 20 corresponds to the address Qwest_Backup_cryptomap_20

  crypto Qwest_Backup_map 20 peer 98.X.X.X card game<== backup="" static="" isp="" at="" site="">

  Qwest_Backup_map 20 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  tunnel-group 72.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 72.X.X.X

  pre-shared-key adadsfasdf

  tunnel-group 98.X.X.X type ipsec-l2l
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 98.X.X.X

  pre-shared-key adadsfasdf

  Thank you

  Jesse,

  One of the solutions to your problem is to apply the same for both interfaces crypto card and have the two counterparts mentioned under a crypto map entry.

  Since you're using track/IP SLA to activate a single link to a single IP address of time will be answers.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/command/reference/C5.html#wp2278871

  Have several inputs card crypto with the same statement in game will cause problems.

  Hope that makes sense.

  Marcin

• Cisco RV016 failover &amp; load balance Multi WAN question

  Hello

  I think the RV016 is the camera to buy for our small building, but I'm a bit confused in the manual if my scheduled configuration is possible, so if you could confirm if this is possible I would appreciate it.

  We have a leased line as our main connection (lets call him WAN1). If this connection is not available, I don't want to load balance to any other network WAN.

  We have 2 netgear 4G devices identical (we'll call WAN 2 and 3 WAN). If the leased line is not available, I would like to then load balance these two WAN connections.

  Then I have a final connection, WAN4 as a slow adsl line. I don't know right now if I want to load balance this WAN1 or just have it as a backup to WAN2 and WAN3 failure (WAN2 and WAN3 have a 20 GB data limit each on their monthly allowance of the contract, if the leased line is down for more than a couple of days, what is unfortunately already happened) (then we reached this limit and then there is charged with extremely expensive data or just use the only ADSL)

  In any case, it's normal, I want to balance the load. I want to only load balance WAN3 and WAN2 WAN1 fails.

  Anyone know if this is possible? If not, is there any other similar device which would be appropriate?

  Thank you

  Ben

  Hi Bencarroll01,

  With RV016 you can get what you need.

  RV016 supports up to 7 WAN connection, and there are two mode of operation

  • Swing smart (Auto Mode): This option allows you to balance traffic between all interfaces increase the available bandwidth. The router balance traffic between the weighted alternating interfaces.
  • Group of IP (by users): Select this option for trafficking group on each WAN interface by levels of priority or classes of service (CoS). With this feature, you can ensure the bandwidth and a more high priority for specified services and users. All traffic that is not added to the IP group uses Intelligent balancing mode. To specify the services and users, click modify for the WAN interface and then add the entries of binding protocol for each service, IP address or IP address range.

  For our case, we must have RV016 configured with IP Group(By User), so in this case, we can configure binding protocol that we can specify and force all traffic from any IP address of the local network outside through WAN1. and any other WAN connection they always towards the TOP but not the traffic passing through them

  Now if WAN1 is down, immediately the rule to redirect traffic WAN 1 will be disabled and all traffic will pass through the rest of the WAN connection

  After that if the WAN1 is once again the binding protocol rule will be active again and again all the traffic will be done by WAN 1

  Please let me know if you have any other questions

  Please rate this post or marked as replied to help other customers of Cisco

  Greetings

  Mehdi

• Pavilion dv7-1285dx option upgrade RAM / dual channel question

  Hello.  I had a few questions on my laptop dv7-1285dx I bought last January.  I explore the idea of upgrading the RAM, and I went on the site crucial and pulled these specs.

  It says that my system has 8 GB of memory dual channel max capacity, but from what I read here on these forums double channel really only works when you have 2 identical modules in each slot, right?  Well, my system came at HP with 1 x 4 GB and 1 x 2 GB installed modules standard package.  (I'm running Vista x 64).

  So, if this is the case, this does mean that I'm not running in double track right now and my computer is a drop in performance right out of the factory?

  Another question I have is my stick of memory from Samsung.  Would I be hurt me if I bought just a stick of 4 GB of crucial and kept the other stick of 4 GB of Samsung and used these two together?  Or is it better to use two Samsung or two Crucial sticks identical?  The sticks have to come from the same kit for best performance?   (IE - in the case of the Samsung, I would of course order a single module if I went this route and kept the original I have now).

  If I increase the RAM, is there anything else I need to do in the BIOS to enable function dual channel (if I don't have it right now) other that physically install the sticks?

  Thank you very much.

  Message edited by REB on 27/05/2009 06:46

  Molvitz has clarified a bit. For memory dual channel sticks must first be the same size (2 x 2 GB or 2 x 4 GB for example) and they must be the same speed and latency times. If you shuffle the cards to Flash the same size you will probably but not certainly have dual channel operation. If you put two identical poles, you are also sure that it is possible to be that they will work in dual channel mode. I have not tried to set up a laptop with 2 x 4 gig of RAM sticks and I believe that there could be problems with channel double use, as mentioned, because this product (4 gig laptop RAM sticks) is so new. I can speak from experience wide enough that what I say above applies to 2 x 1 gig and 2 x 2 GB.

• LRT224 - Dual WAN port forwarding

  Can you move forward say port 80 1 Wan IP and port 80 from WAN 2 to a different IP address. ?

  Also can you somehow choose TCP & UDP rather large only one or the other?

  I just replaced 2 routers with LRT 214 and LRT 224 TPLink its all works well. Except port forwarding

  With LRT224, a port forwarding rule is applied to the two WAN ports and two rules are necessary if you want to ship to TCP and UDP to the same internal IP address.

• RV042 Dual WAN Port DMZ not acquire an IP from ISP

  Hello

  I am trying to replace my router with the more robust RV042 of current load balancing. Installation seems simple enough. However, I am having an issue gets an IP address of the DMZ port in load balancing mode.

  The two WAN is the same ISP and is both DSL, using the same models of DSL Modem. #1 WAN port works perfectly.

  Indeed, when an independent piece of equipment is installed in the #2 DSL modem, this gives an IP address instantly...

  The two DSL lines only require a MAC address to get their IP addresses, and none of the static values are allowed, perhaps to test only.

  The issue of intellectual property has been seen before. I can't find any reference to the iton this site.

  Thank you

  Steve

  Glad to hear that it works.

  The "save the settings and restart" is not all that rare, although it is not typical for your model.

  The obligation of power off is certainly not normal. He told me that some sort of electric lock has occurred. This could be a unique thing, caused by a discharge of static electricity, or it could indicate a manufacturing defect. If this is the first case he did re - is probably. If it is the latter, then it will need a trade at any given time.

  In any case, it seems that the MAC address index has been at least partially useful.

  Good luck, somone will be here if you need assistance once again.

• ISA570 Weighted Dual Wan &amp; Failover

  So, we had a few problems here while we were both WITH link failover detection two ISPs for balancing.  Our problems seemed if go away once we have disabled the link failover.  What is happening is a wan link out randomly, it was not a particular wan link.  We could have one out one day and another on another day. I thought I would post to see if anyone knows or had problems with doing a 50-50 balanced weighted load scenario with the failover link light.  Now, with the recovery of disabled link, it seems that if a wan link goes down, computers are always sent on this bad wan link.

  I did a combination of the two in deployments. Most of them is connections of failover with low cost connection primary and secondary connections of 4 G of type variable cost. I have not had any problems with load balancing and failover work together, but I can not also think all instances where he arrived so I can't be certain that he would not fail. ;-) If please try DNS and let me know if you experience the same results. If If, I would open a TAC case if Cisco can try to locate the bug, assuming that there is one at this time. Please keep me dated with your results. Thank you.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• RV82 Dual WAN and online banking. Packages of two IP addresses

  Hi all

  I have a set RV082 in place with two different ISPS (load balancing). Some time ago, users began to experience problems with online banking. It seems that the banking system set up more than a 'channel' to/from the end user and that bank systems won't accept that the packets come from 2 different public IP. I solved this by linking all HTTPS traffic to WAN1.

  Is this a good solution or is there a better way to deal with this? I'm afraid that it will be 'imbalance' my network as many services like Netflix and Youtube is HTTPS.

  Are there other services online that may have problems with a configuration of load balancing?

  If WAN1 breaks down. WAN2 will start HTTPS transport even if HTTPS is related to WAN1?

  I also have a similar problem with the router alert (goes to wrong ISP each time second), but this seems to be fixed in the latest firmware:
  "Authentication of email account is configurable for email alert".

  Thanks in advance

  Jone

  Hello James,

  Your solution is correct.  Certain types of secure connection HTTPS or SSH will not work if you keep changing IP address source, because it breaks the three-way handshake.  To avoid that you binding memorandum of installation you have.  You can do the same for all other traffic must always go out to a certain port WAN.

  If the WAN connection selected for protocol links to crashes, he switched to the other WAN until the connection retrieves.

  I have not seen too many online services that have problems with the load balancing is especially with secure connections, namely HTTPS.  I tried to access the HTTPS, Netflix, but I could never get an encrypted connection, but your best bet is to monitor and observe the network to see how it affects you.

  I mean the line you are citing has to do with the configuration of authentication to an SMTP server to send alerts by e-mail, rather than choose a port WAN to use, however if you protocol links SMTP to the WAN you would use that should no longer be a problem.

  Hope that helps,

  Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  * Please note the useful messages *.

• RV016 - Dual WAN &amp; Secure connection problem

  I have settings wrong my RV016 upward to allow connections secured on our server. I have searched the forums and read a lot of posts and it seems that the protocol binding is the answer, but I can't make it work.

  We have a static double-WAN with 5 IPs configuration on our slow connection (a cable modem, 1 WAN) and a dynamic IP address on our fast (FIOS, 2 WAN). I use special NAT to send all incoming traffic on a static (on WAN 1) to static IP internal IP of our server. We use intelligent load balancing and (by a message I read) I turned off the detection of Network Service on the two networks.

  When I try to SSH from outside the server, I get through: I get a password and, if I get the wrong password I'm re - you are prompted for the password. But when I enter the password of the connection hangs. When I unplug WAN 2 I can connect on SSH without problem.

  I tried implementing binding protocol as follows: I created a service for SSH (TCP/22 ~ 22) and added to WAN 1. I remembered to turn it on. I played with a different IP address ranges, but nothing works (it is where I am a little out of my League). Here is what I tried:

  • Internal IP of the server at all: 10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
  • internal subnet at all: 10.10.10.2 ~ 10.10.10.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)

  In a lot of posts I read that binding protocol has solved bad people to a connection secure. What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Alex

  Hi Alex, I think one thing that you should really consider is the DMZ to see if it localized to a problem of double-WAN or not. If the problem follows with two WAN upward in the DMZ, I agree there is something which perhaps does not properly.

  Another argument may be, if you are the type of thinking somehow that load balancing is messing things up, link ALL SERVICE for the server to a specific WAN, don't let not limited just a port. That can also give an idea, especially if the server works as expected.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Connections RV042G Dual WAN

  We are a Cisco DPC3825 provided by our ISP cable modem connection.  It has been configured to act as a switch only.  They provided us with 2 static IP addresses.

  When each WAN port is connected individually, all right.  I see the IP addresses on the respective WAN port, and it works fine.

  When I connect the two WAN ports to the modem at the same time, I see a large amount of traffic between the WAN ports, as indicated by the port LEDs, and the RV042G becomes totally inadmissible through its web interface.

  How can I get the RV042G working with two connected WAN ports?

  Hi Rory, I'm not sure that the CPD is designed to aggregate in this way traffic. I wouldn't be surprised if he made a loop network, especially if you see a lot of broadcast or multicast packets.

  The most typical deployment has usually 2 connections that are unique modems.  I would suspect your 2 static IP addresses are on the same subnet / block ip that the router do not know how to react to load balance this scenario since he's going to the same destination in turn causing a loop until resources are consumed.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV042 dual wan vpn

  Hi all

  I have the cisco RV042 vpn router. I have 1 mb lease line in my office and around 15 to 20 users. can I use this Rv042 vpn router to share internet in my office .i need not creat vpn and all. I want only internet share in my .will be only desktop support?

  Hi chandrakant,.

  Thanks for posting your question. You want to share internet with your employees? If so, yes it is supported. You can plug the switch into the router and plug your PC used in the switch. All users will have access to the internet.