SF302 - 08 p & MP

Similar Questions

• How can I analyze the flow on SF302 - 08 p

  Hello

  I have a SF302 switch - 08 p and I'm looking for an option to analyze all streams on it. I tried to enable netflow, but it seems that the product does not support because I can't access the stream ip like here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/netflow/configuration/12-4t/nf-12-4t-book/cfg-nflow-data-expt.html

  Here is some information on the switch:

  switch08G4 #show version
  SW version 1.3.5.58 (date October 10, 2013 time 17:15:41)
  Start the version 1.0.0.4 (April 8, 2010 time 16:37:57)
  HW version V30
  switch08G4 terminal #configure
  switch08G4 (config) #interface range 1-8 FE
  switch08G4 (config-if-range) #ip
  ARP ARP configuration commands
  configuration DHCP DHCP services
  Guard-defined source enable IP Source Guard on the interface status
  switch08G4 (config-if-range) #ip infiltration flow
  % Unrecognized command

  Thank you for your answer

  Hi Emmanuel, this product does not support anything like Netflow. Your next bet is SNMP and who would probably not do what you want, if you are specifically looking for the Netflow feature sets.

  One thing I have a question, when you say "analyze the flow of all", does that mean that you want to capture all the traffic, you can record and read it again? The closest you can do with is doing a session on the monitor for a VLAN integer and launch wireshark there to capture the data. I'm not sure that's what you want, but if you want to capture all packets and save it somewhere, it's a way to do it, but a bad way to do it.

• Configuration of VLAN Switch SF302 - 08 p

  I have the following Setup using two switches PoE SF302 - 08 p:

  1st floor

  =========

  SWITCH1 # <------->private network

  <------->public network

  2nd floor

  =========

  Switch #2 <------->private network

  ... public network (visible, but devices can't connect)

  I tried to do the config in the identical to the #1 switch #2 switch, but something still does not work.

  This is probably a configuration issue VLAN, or what?

  Thank you.

  Ken Watkins

  Hi Ken, the interfaces between switches must both vlan of the port.

  example of

  VLAN 1

  VLAN 2

  port 1 connects to port 1 of the second switch

  config t

  interface gi01

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2

  The ports between switches must be vlan unidentified native, all other VLAN Tag. In my example, 1u, 2 t.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• SF302 - 08 p Switch VLAN problem

  Hello

  I have a problem to set up a SF 302 - 08 p switch for VLAN. Here's my setup. I have two switches that are configured almost the same. The first switch is a SF200 - 24 p with 12 ports on VLAN1 and VLAN2 12 ports. The port of G1 is the trunk entering with 1UP, 2 t and all port of G2 at 1UP, 2 t connection to the G1 port on the switch of SF302-8. The two VLAN works OK on the SF200-24 switch. The port on the SF200-24 is set on trunk 1UP, 2T, and G1 on the SF302-8 port is set on trunk 1UP, 2 t. The composition of port VLAN on the SF302-8 figure to the VLAN 1 port 1-4 is 1UP and VLAN 2 port 5-8 is set to 2UP. Ports 1 to 4 work OK but the 5-8 does not connect to the vlan 2. I downloaded the latest firmware for the SF302 but it did not make a difference. Any suggestions on what I'm missing?

  Dan, send me an email with a number I can reach you. I am available at 4 pm Eastern.

  Update to this topic, we discovered a problem of layer 1, the switch upstream was a misplaced thread, leading to the port is misconfigured.

  Post edited by: Thomas Watts

• Bandwidth limited by switch SF302 - 08 p?

  Just put in a SF302 switch - 08 p with of two AP541N. Just a Comcast modem connects in the switch with two Pat, nothing else. Speedtest via the modem cable with nothing plugged it is 48Mbps. Then connect a single switch the laptop shows a 33Mbps speedtest. Then, with the two connected AP541N and using the same laptop via WiFi, I had seen systematically 10 Mbps for download. But right now the cable modem directly showed me almost 50Mbps at a speed test.

  Have by default in all devices, Cisco, factory and poured on the settings and it seems that the throttling is disabled. Suspecting perhaps it's for the quality of service and optimize the voice, but I see specific locations in devices where I could name optimization of voice and those who are not allowed. Then started thinking about tweaking wireless spectrum, but did not want to do anything too unstable.

  Anyone else run into this? Am I missing something obvious?

  -Ed

  Hi Ed,

  This is not typical of the switch. First of all, please make sure that the switch is at least the 1.1.2.0 firmware, this is the most stable version. There is a new version from this week 1.2.7.76 if you want to give this a go as well. After the flash/update firmware, factory of resets the device.

  I recommend starting with Layer 1 and layer 1 related parameters. As a trading port. If you check the port management, you're negotiating 10, 100, 100, full or half-duplex? Don't you see any kind of beating on the log port? (link up, down on the link to one of the ports). Can you try to disable the EEE (energy efficient ethernet) throughout the world and on the parameters of the interface? If you go to the smart port section and go to the interface parameter, it seems that the smart port negotiated anything with the modem?

  -Tom

• Cisco SF302 - 08 p (SRW208P-K9-NA) support for Cisco IP 7942 phones

  Hi all

  I'm looking for, citing the SF302 - 08 p for a customer who will have three small offices interconnected via single-mode fiber. I plan connecting them to a 3560 switch. Each office will have not more than 3-7942 phones. I have reviewed the notes on this switch, and it seems that it should support this type of phone with no problems. Could you tell if you have run into problems of support/reliability with this switch and the 7942 s?

  Thank you

  Hi RevereORL,

  My concern is that there is;

  • the slight nuances or differences between the configuration of the CLI on the SG300 compared to the range of catalyst.
  • I am also very very slightly concerned post service customer interaction of the TAC and HWC, but these days there is much more to talk between these two support groups cross.
  • Different SKU SFP for fibre-optic connectivity Series GLC for catalyst and set of Construction on 300, although I have no problem with the plug of the GLC SKU of my product in the 300 series.

  The SF302 - 8 p has of a POE budget defined as 62W on all 8 ports or 62 watts / 8 ports = 7.75 watts about which may be drawn from each port.

  Power should not be a problem with the software upgrade to 1.1.1.8 300 series now also supports POE before standard as well as the 802.3af...

  I guess the beauty of buying from a dealer, and keep the packaging, is that you can validate your application.

  Give it a try.

  Best regards, Dave

• No menu available for the upgrade of firmware 1.3.7.18 on SF302 - 08 p

  Upgrade to the latest firmware and try to access the menu of the cli, but the menu command is no longer available

  Due to a problem in config that I'll probably have to factory reset and the only way that I could get a default value for the gateway switch was via the menu. There seems to be no CLI option

  Pls advise

  Connect to the CLI:

  Switch (config) # ip default-gateway 192.168.XX. XX

• Authorization number SF302-08MPP AAA

  Hello

  I'm having a problem with RAY is working on a 302-08MPP SF. RADIUS server works well with the other switch, IE cat2960. I get the following error message when I try to connect using the AD credentials, that work on my other switches.

  Invalid user or password on the screen and in the newspapers of switch RAM entry journal below.

  WARNING % AAA-W-REJECT: New connection https, destination source REJECTED

  I don't see any errors on the server Computer (Server Windows 2008 R2 ent)

  Under Security-online RAY, I used most of the default setting and match on the NPS (RADIUS) server.

  The active access profile is one that I created for HTTPS and my PC is the authorized device.

  Is that all that I'm missing? Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  John

  Hello

  Depending on the configuration of the guide http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

  ' For the server RADIUS grant access to the web-based configuration utility the.
  RADIUS server must return "cisco-avpair = shell: priv-lvl = 15.»

  It must be if ensure with "access-accept" the server returns to allow users access to GUI.

  Here are a few links that might help:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/10687961/Windows-2008-NPS-rad...

  http://technologyordie.com/Windows-NPS-RADIUS-authentication-of-Cisco-PR...

  Kind regards

  Kush

• How to disable the prompt 'more' when you run the command 'See logging' CLI

  Hello. I would like to know if there is a command that I can run to disable paging on my SF302 switch.

  Thus, for example, when I run the command 'See logging' on the CLI, I care about her return all results rather than ask me hit the SPACEBAR or enter.

  Is there a way to do this?

  Thanks in advance for your time and your consideration.

  J.L.

  command is

  terminal datadump

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• SF-200 and 300 SF Fan or not a Fan

  I have to install some switches in a quiet environment and may not know whether or not the particular models have a FAN?   Does anyone know I searched on cisco dosc nothing helps

  SF-200 24 p Power over Eth

  SF-200 24 no PoE

  SF-300 24 p PoE

  SF-300-24 without PoE

  Anyone can answer the question FAN or NO FAN of these switches?

  Thank you

  Steve

  Hi Steve,.

  Here are the details you want.

  The SLM refreshed series switches are below.  Model comparisons and n/p located here command

  Model			Fan (number)			Acoustic noise					MTBF @ 40 ° C (hours)
  SF200-24			Without fan			N/A					414 166
  SF200 - 24 P			1pc			40.2 dB					307 098
  SF200-48			Without fan			N/A					267 865
  SF200 - 48P			2PC			41,7 dB					174 966
  SG200-08			Without fan			N/A					71 834
  SG200 - 08 P			Without fan			N/A					69 003
  SG200-18			Without fan			N/A					68 033
  SG200-26			Without fan			N/A					194 278
  SG200 - 26			1pc			40.2 dB					218 842
  SG200-50			2PC			41,7 dB					237 610
  SG200 - 50 P			4pc			30 ° C DB 42.5 40 ° C = dB 54.7					208 976

  Switches series refreshed SRW is below.   Located model comparisons here with order p/n

  Model name

  FAN (number)

  Acoustic noise

  MTBF @ 40 c (hours)

  SG300-20

  Without fan

  N/A

  144 237

  SG300-10

  Without fan

  N/A

  74 294

  SG300 - 10 P

  Without fan

  N/A

  67 009

  SG300-10MP

  Without fan

  N/A

  67 008

  SF300-08

  Without fan

  N/A

  71 006

  SF302-08

  Without fan

  N/A

  69 825

  SF302 - 08 P

  Without fan

  N/A

  65 527

  SF302-08MP

  Without fan

  N/A

  63 569

  SG300-28

  Without fan

  N/A

  17,9141

  SG300 - 28 P

  2 pcs

  40,6 dB

  187,334.9

  SG300-52

  2 pcs

  40.1DB

  206,005.6

  SF300-24

  Without fan

  N/A

  282,775.3

  SF300 - 24 P

  2 pcs

  41.0 dB

  241,995.9

  SF300-48

  Without fan

  N/A

  199,664.2

  SF300 - 48P

  3 pcs w / fan speed regulator

  43.1dB at 30 C 54.3dB to 40 ° C

  182,540.0

• Getting disconnected when you add an interface VLAN

  Hello

  I am trying to configure a switch SF302-08MP in a test environment with a couple of VLAN. A default state, I configured the device to be in mode L3, added a VLAN and then added an IP interface to this VLAN. The problem I have is that as soon as I add the IP interface for the VLAN I create I lose connection to the switch immediately and either have to reconfigure the interface through the CLI or restart the device to lose my changes.

  I realize, I can configure the box through the CLI to find my connection and complete the configuration of my VLAN, but I'm trying to get off a good process to configure it through the web interface (outside the facility in L3 initial mode of course).

  For that, I connect to the IP address by default on the VLAN 1 (192.168.1.254). The measures taken include:

  1. access the CLI interface and set the mode of L3

  2 reset

  3. access to the switch via a web browser on 192.168.1.254 and login

  4. Add VLAN 2 (management of VLANS / create a VLAN)

  5. Add the Interface IP (IP Configuration / Interface IPv4, selecting VLAN2 when you complete the add interface of dialogue)

  6 lose the connection to 192.168.1.254 when you click on apply

  I did this on other switches in the 300 series in the past in the same way without problem, but for some reason, that this switch 8 ports gives me problems.

  Any advice would be much appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Hello Craig,.

  On the 300 series switches, when you add the first IP interface it will remove the interface "generic / by default. Of course, this will remove your access as you saw.

  Simple around this problem is first of all create a new interface for the vlan 1. You can set this in the 192.168.1.254 or together for what you plan to use.

  Once done, you should now be able to create interfaces for other VLANs without problem.

• The 300 series switches are compatible with detection of PoE before standard in old phones Cisco?

  The 300 series switches are compatible with detection of PoE before standard in old phones Cisco? They don't seem to be (7902G don't turn on when it is connected to a SF302-08MP with firmware version 1.1). What no need special configuration on the switch to enable this detection?

  Please note that the switches of the series 200 and 300 are now supported POE Legacy Cisco from September 2011, to provide power to 7960, 7940 and other phones standard pre and APs. Details on the following link:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-18337

• How dumb you down a small business SF300 until a transparent bridge?

  I use the Cisco SF302 switches as a connection to wireless devices that will be the link between the two buildings.

  In this configuration: Cisco 3570 in building 1 > Cisco SF302 > 1 wireless bridge construction > construction 2 Wireless Bridge > Cisco SF302 > Cisco 3560 in building 2.

  It seems that by default the SF302 are not acting as bridges, transparent and just leave all my 802. 1 q through traffic.

  How dumb them down for that all 802. 1 q traffic is treated by the 3570 and 3560 with just SF302 acting under the bridge let my 802. 1 q to cross safely?

  Thank you.

  By default, VLANs are not automatically added to trunk ports. You must create them and assign them to the trunk ports. This has been done for security reasons.

• Uplinks slow RV180

  Hello

  I have experience slower speeds on the ports that are used for the uplink on my RV180:

  -to plug my laptop directly into the RV180 that is used as a router WAN, I have beautiful wanspeeds Mbit/s approx. 98

  -When you plug into the switch 8-port SF302 - 08 p it's binding to the RV180, the maximum speed drops to 25 / 30 Mbps

  -same symptoms for a little d-link switch: when you plug in the switch of 25/30 Mbit / s, when you plug its uplink directly into my laptop, I get 95 to 100 Mbps.

  I went through the configurations, but do not know what could be the problem.

  Hello

  Note that the reports of the unit that he negotiated the speed/duplex. Also, I have experienced several scenarios in which 1 G when it is connected to 100M goes haywire. One of our fixes is to encode in hard botht he speed and duplex on TWO ports of 1 G and 100 M port, but in your case, you can't hardcode the settign 100 m because it is unmanaged

  IM positive it's trading port of the switch you have, given that it is a switch (and cheap): P

  Status > statistics the only way to check the speed of the port of port? -Yes

  PS: Have you any other switch that it supports 1 G? How about you, try another port on the RV?