Cisco SF302 - 08 p (SRW208P-K9-NA) support for Cisco IP 7942 phones

Hi all

I'm looking for, citing the SF302 - 08 p for a customer who will have three small offices interconnected via single-mode fiber. I plan connecting them to a 3560 switch. Each office will have not more than 3-7942 phones. I have reviewed the notes on this switch, and it seems that it should support this type of phone with no problems. Could you tell if you have run into problems of support/reliability with this switch and the 7942 s?

Thank you

Hi RevereORL,

My concern is that there is;

  • the slight nuances or differences between the configuration of the CLI on the SG300 compared to the range of catalyst.
  • I am also very very slightly concerned post service customer interaction of the TAC and HWC, but these days there is much more to talk between these two support groups cross.
  • Different SKU SFP for fibre-optic connectivity Series GLC for catalyst and set of Construction on 300, although I have no problem with the plug of the GLC SKU of my product in the 300 series.

The SF302 - 8 p has of a POE budget defined as 62W on all 8 ports or 62 watts / 8 ports = 7.75 watts about which may be drawn from each port.

Power should not be a problem with the software upgrade to 1.1.1.8 300 series now also supports POE before standard as well as the 802.3af...

I guess the beauty of buying from a dealer, and keep the packaging, is that you can validate your application.

Give it a try.

Best regards, Dave

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Support for Adobe DPS Android phones

    Hi all

    Android smartphones are supported by DPS just like the iPhone? I did some research on the forums and have not quite found a solid answer. Thank you.

    Yes, using the native Viewer.

  • Changes in prices for the contracts of Support for Cisco IDS/IPS

    Nice day

    My boss asked me if there is no value added regarding Cisco's recent move to charge separately for hardware and software support for IDS/IPS product line.

    Other than what is obvious (need software support for updates of signature, need of material support in case something breaks), I'm having a hard time to provide a response.

    Can anyone suggest what is the increased value, other than annual recurrent costs more we get as a result of this change of license?

    Also, was there any release press or other notice to the client about this change?

    I am at a loss...

    Alex Arndt

    Alex,

    Cut through the spin and the hype... the software support allows us to finance a development team dedicated to signature, which has improved our signature rejection rates and response times. In addition, it is allowing us to expand our coverage to keep IDS 4.1 to get the support of the signature. It is contrary to our previous policy which would have seen 4.1 updates to signature cut shortly after 5.0 released.

    A side effect of this is that our development team is now free to focus on the development of the feature, and you will see more updates, more often.

    Can't comment on press releases and others, they make your head spin my ;)

    Scott

  • I need a list of devices supported for VSOM 6.3.2

    I need a list of devices supported for VSOM 6.3.2.   The link I had previously recorded with this info for different versions of VSOM is no longer there is a world of Cisco.com.  Help, please.

    Thank you.

    I think that the list you're looking for are accessible through the portal of emerging Cisco Technologies to:

    https://www.ciscoet.com/resource/VSM-632-MR2-supported-devices-list

    I hope this helps!

    Scott Olsen
    Solutions specialist
    Bulletproof Solutions Inc..
    Web: www.bulletproofsi.com

  • UCS 1.4 support for PVLAN

    Hi all

    Cisco UCS 1.4 Adviser supports PVLAN. But I see the following comment on PVLAN in point 1.4 of the UCS

    "UCS extends PVLAN support for virtualized (without vSwitch) deployments."

    "UCS release 1.4 (1) supports isolated PVLAN support for physical server paths or Palo NAC vNIC ports."

    Is that means PVLAN will not work for the virtual machine if VMs is connected to the UCS by Nexus1000v or vDS even if I use the card of PALO (M81KR)?

    Could someone can confirm that?

    Thank you very much!

    Hello

    Yes - PVLANs must be from end to end.

    You can extend the PVLAN set to 1000v and then to bare metal (attached to UCS) servers to a port promiscous * outside * UCS as a backup station or a L3 interface.

    Pls remember that promiscous ports are not supported in UCS. Only access isolated at the moment.

    With the M81KR adapter (Palo), you must create a diff for each interface isolated VLAN (as UCS cannot do isolated trunks yet).

    In you case you seem to have 1 isolated VLAN vNIC so 4 total giving to the 1000v running ESX.

    2 vNIC for VLAN regular (load sharing and redundancy)

    2 network cards for the VLAN isolated (load sharing and redundnacy).

    See attached a doc that talking abt doing which I think is what you're asking.

    Thank you

    -Matt

  • List of devices supported for NAC

    Dear,

    The device supported the list below by support does'nt cisco Express 500 as a deployment of edge but in my network I m having 500 Express and they pass the packets through the NAC, they are supported. How?  Can someone inform me abt this.

    Also can I find the list of supported HP switches. ???

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/NAC/appliance/support_guide/switch_spt.html#wp82850

    Thank you

    LKO

    Well, there is nothing to worry about.

    This table taken switches supported is only show taken switches support where you can plug in the case.

    Keep in mind the title of the table: "Switch Support for CASE virtual band/OOB-mapping feature bridge VLAN.

    If you use the switch as an access pass-band, then we don't care of the switch...

    On the HP support, there is no support from HP switches for deployment of the Central/CASE edge.

    HTH,
    Tiago

    --

    If this helps you or answers to your question if it you please mark it as 'responded' or write it down, if other users can easily find it.

  • Unity Mobile Message Access 1.0 (1) support for Domino?

    The MMA 1.0 unit (1) supports the integration of unity with Domino? In the 4.1 (1) Release Notes, he claims that the MMA for BlackBerry is available for use with Cisco Unity with Exchange, but nothing is said about support for unity with Domino:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/products/SW/voicesw/ps2237/prod_release_note09186a0080531dd3.html#wp654640

    The release notes for 4.2 (1) do not mention anything about adding support for MMA for the unit w / Domino.

    Thank you.

    4.2 (1) the unit doesn't support MMA/Blackberry with Domino right now. However, this feature is currently targeted for the 4.3 version 1. It may actually require no code changes - if so, we can announce a support before 4.3 is released 1. In summary, it should be available soon.

    On a related note, GoodTech publishes good - support for Domino for use with compatible devices like the TREO and many more - targeted release is this summer. When it came out, voice attachments (.wav files) from the unit will be available similar to the existing solution of good/Exchange / unit. Interesting for non-Blackberry users...

  • Support for hardware and signature to the AIP SSM-10

    We have a 5510 which we bought a map AIP SSM-10 for the SAA, which is already the subject of a support contract. We now want to add the hardware maintenance for the new card AIP SSM-10 as signature updates. Our Cisco provider is confirmed we will receive that updates of signature with hardware support (we tried to get a response from them since June or July now).

    Could someone let us know what is the correct part number, and so we can ask the specific option that will allow both the material cover and signature updates.

    I think it is need you

    CON-SU1-AS1A1PK9 IPS, NBD SVC, AR ASA5510-AIP10SP-K9

    support for Cisco smartnet

  • WebVPN - error: access method is not supported for the capture of WebVPN

    I'm watching a capture of webvpn on the SAA. I start the capture:

    test type webvpn user capture (entering a valid user name)

    Then I connect to the ASA to try to see track with "Using a browser to capture displayed data" as described in the setup guide.

    https:// / admin/capture/test/OCAP

    After login, I get this message in the browser:

    "Error: access method is not supported for WebVPN capture."

    If I stop the capture (capture test) before you try to connect, the error in the browser is:

    "404 not found".

    The/admin/capture/test/OCAP requested URL was not found on this server. "

    Any ideas greatly appreciated. Thank you!

    After some research, I finally found it

    DOC: Webvpn catches are recorded only in zip format


    CSCtg79320

    Symptom:

    WebVPN captures are only saved in zip format.

    Conditions:

    According to the following doc:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa82/configuration/guide/WebVPN.html#wp1153077

    WebVPN captures can be recovered in the pcap format using the browser, which is incorrect. The document must be corrected.

    Workaround solution:

    N/A

    Thank you for your time and cooperation

    Portu.

    In case you have any other questions please note all useful messages and mark this question as answered

  • TMS support for SQL (standard/express) 2012

    Is there a timetable yet for 2012 SQL support for MSDS?  I have a situation where he would have preferred to use SQL 2012 rather than 2008.

    That said, someone has actually tried it and if yes are there any problems or "traps"?

    I guess while I'm, what about Windows Server 2012 support?

    Hello Anthony.

    Research on forums a few Windows and SQL 2012 support questions.  This is a debate which answer your questions both...

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/4046686

  • my iphone 5s is technical support and warranty den sand support is expired.now I phone doesn't help, give me suggetion

    my iphone 5 s's technical support has expired and den and guarantee support is expired.now I phone doesn't help, give me a suggestion.

    Apple offers out-of-service/replacement under warranty at a cost. If your phone is broken or does not, make an appointment at the genius bar to your Apple store and see what they say.

    If you want to help us, you will need to explain what the problem is. "useless" is not very descriptive.

  • Support for zoom

    Has anyone used MacKeeper and then Zoom support for aid in line with mac?  I have a mac book (not pro).

    Avoid MacKeeper. Your Mac runs the maintenance in the background for you.

    I don't know how MacKeeper and Support of Zoom have something to do with the other?

  • No support for npapi plugin?

    Hi, we use software that is based on JAVA for our clients to access our services. As I read in some news, support for NPAPI plugins will end in the 64-bit version of firefox 41 (so java no longer be supported). This is only version 64-bit windows or Linux and Mac also being targeted? We need this information so that we can tell our customers that we always support the browsers.
    Thanks in advance

    Only the start of Firefox Win64 41,0 + version will have only whitelisted Flash Player 64-bit for now.

    64 bit versions of Mac OSX and Linux may continue to use other plugins compatible 64-bit in addition to Flash Player.

    That the Firefox 42.0 is the current target for Win64 version as was 41.0 previously. The Fx Win64 41.0 b # is based on the beta channel will be affected by the white list.

  • now that we are in July 2015 support for windows xp is dead. Until when firefox will support xpsp3. It is until December 2015 as google chrome or mid-2016

    support for Windows xpsp3

    Mozilla has not announced a given as to when support for WinXp SP3 will end.

  • Support for OpenPGP smartcard instead of the primary password

    What about adding support for OpenPGP smart?
    You can change the password to 'simple' by a card authentication chip OpenPGP (required to decrypt the stored passwords).

    Best regards
    Armando

    not serious. If you want to add a feature. Please fill it as a bug in bugzilla.

Maybe you are looking for