Slow logon to VMware View

Similar Questions

• VMWare View slow slide windows when you use two monitors

  I am experiencing very slow slide of windows from one monitor to the other when using VMWare View Client. I followed all the documentation on configuring dual monitors in VMWare View and I removed the background images, Windows 7 Setup, configure the video settings for better performance. Not sure if I'm missing something. Help, please.

  Hi Joshua,.

  Here are KB which may help you if you have not seen that.

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=2010359

  Concerning

  Mohammed

• VMware View 4.5 Client slow in WAN

  Hello

  We tested VMware View 4.5 Client in WAN and it seems to be slow.

  Not too big gap between RDP and PCoIP.

  How much bandwidth needed a client VMware View 4.5 normally, a normal desktop, non-multimedia user?

  Thanks Mike,.

  Here are some notes more - in addition to sizing guidelines, it may be wise to adapt some of the PCoIP session variables - see the knowledge base article http://techsupport.teradici.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=15164&task=knowledge&questionID=348Teradici.

  In addition, for MPLS to check if the load balancing has been configured for the link?  Per packet load balancing results in fragmented packets that should not be used with PCoIP Protocol.  If you need load balancing MPLS consider using instead the load balancing and the destination.

  If you have not already done so, do not hesitate to ask the team to Teradici - you can send an email to [email protected].

  Stu

  Teradici Systems Engineering

• VMware View 4 - PCoIP - scanning is very slow

  When you scan from a USB scanner from a heavy client without VDI, it takes 7 seconds. When you use VMware View with PCoIP 4.0, it takes 52 seconds.

  Any suggestions?

  Rgds

  M

  I sent an email to teradici support and they checked the speed was closer to the USB 1.1 instead of 2.0.   If you PM me your email I'll send you the conversation

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

• VMWARE HORIZION VIEW 6.0: it does not serve any which RDS (using PCoIP) session to my zero Teradici Clients but it works with Horizon of VMware View client 3.0.0 from my computer

  Hi all

  I'm testing view Horizon 6.0 Service sessions (Windows 2008 R2) RDS through PCoIP. I think that my setup is just because I can connect via Horizion View Client (installed in my laptop or my Android smartphone). But when I try to connect from a Client Tera zero, 1 or 2 (with the latest firmware), at the same time I did logon, I still have this error:

  "View server connection has no return of available virtual desktops."

  Could someone tell what can be wrong?

  Concerning

  As a result of this discussion "Re: RDS support is included in Vmware View (broker)?" I saw that I must spend my customers zero to 4.5.1 firmware. Once I did, Tera 2 Zero Clients work very well but do not have customers zero 1 Tera.

  I expect response from Teradici.

  Concerning

• Unidesk and VMware View

  Hi, can someone please tell me their experience with Unidesk? We are planning to test it, but I was wondering what other users have to say about it. What are the pros and cons in your opinion on the use of unidesk with VMware View?

  Thank you

  While you're good at using a floating pool, so remove the value from the user customization layer, you still earn many benefits.

  1. you get always keep exactly 1 gold image of the operating system.

  2. you always deploy the applications in the form of layers.

  3. you still get storage savings.

  I would like to add a fourth: the machines date back to default when to disconnect users.   In any pool of floating type, you will have some sort of data instead of roaming solution.   Gone perhaps roaming profiles and folder redirection of strictly MS background, or a solution that either, so there is no loss of functionality as the users are concerned.   As someone who has 15 years of dealing with those terminal services and support model office, let me tell you that I would've liked nothing more than a system that will automatically return to the original state at each reboot.

  I have a floating pool on "VMs Unidesk" I use for purposes of remote access for all and for our standard users in the office.   I have all basic applications we use loaded in it.   I use the folder redirection to send Documents, the desktop, Favorites and more downloads to our storage system, then have MS profiles configured for an ORGANIZATIONAL unit containing these roving machines.   AppData is basically all that is stored on the sharing profile, so user logons are super fast.   I even turned on Microsoft EU - V, which is so smooth, I just laugh whenever I see it working (essentially saved application configs in repository as XML files and pulls / pushes them back when applications are open, closed, etc..)   UE - V lets my PC full users to have their applications, such as their desktop themes settings or something else, fill in the VDI environment automatically, which gives a more consistent experience across devices.

  In any case, don't throw all this just because you won't get the layer customization user on floating pools.   There's always a ton of advantages with it...

• Two monitors configured using PCoIP does not cover both monitors for VMware View

  Occasionally, I've experienced the symptoms described in KB1027899, when usually the first time of connection for the day that I select multiscreen and the screen is divided in the Middle the 2 monitors using PCoIP. I end up disconnecting and reconnecting to the virtual machine a few times, which is a valid solution, but I'm still curious about why this is happening.

  I am running VMware View 5.0.0 build-481677, on a Wyse R90L with Windows XP Embedded, I use VMware View Client 5.0.0 build 481677 and VMWare View agent on a box of Windows 7 5.0.0 build 481677. We lack vCenter and ESXi 5.0.0 in all areas as well.

  According to the article, this happens because there is not enough video memory configured for the virtual computer. The problem I have is that if I force the pool offices use PCoIP and 128 MB of video memory, I can't RDP to the workstation as the Protocol is locked, I need to still be able to do. I tried manually increase the memory video, but view reconfigures to match the settings of the pool.

  Is there a way to increase the video memory without changing the required logon Protocol? Or is there a fix in a different way to this question?

  Thanks a lot guys.

  Joe

  Have you tried to change the configuration video pool to be 2 monitors with 2560 x # instead of the default resolution to see if that solves the problem?

  Datto

• VMware View 5 PCoIP get a black screen on wide AREA network

  Hello community,

  I got a VMware View 5 Infrastructure with a vCenter Server, a connectionserver of view and some clients such as VMs.

  Internally, everything works - connections PCoIP and RDP do their job very well.

  Know that we want to publish the vDesktops over the WAN. Users must connect to the virtual machines in their laptops or iPad (or iPhone) at home. So, we have configured our firewall to open the IP Wan (194.209.166.xy) to the internal IP (192.168.199.xy). A DNS entry for view.xy.com shows the IP WAN. If the WAN connection to infrastructure display RDP works - but PCoIP connections shows a black screen after 10 to 30 seconds after logon. We never see an interaction of oder break Windows. The screen is black after the logoninformations in the client view.

  We have configured the connectionserver display settings as described in some articles here... 7

  The external url HTTPS: https://view.xy.com

  checkbox activ: tunnel connection secure user desktop

  PCoIP external url: 194.209.166.xy:4172

  checkbox activ: use pcoip gateway secure for pcoip Desktop connections

  We have forgotten to do some settings or is it an another workaround to work with PCoIP over the WAN?

  Kind regards

  Freddie

  Cross video related to the above article. It describes exactly the configuration you are working. If you have any questions on this subject, let us know and someone on this forum will help you.

  Select this option.

• Poor performance VMWare View 4.6

  We deployed a small VMWare View solution for administrative personnel, accounting and CAD / drafting of users. Currently, we have race 21 VM and received daily complaints about the performance, some days better than others but all well below the level of performance of a desktop computer configured in a way appropriate. We are either duty put an end to the use of the output of this system and return to the standard desktop computers or add an additional server to view VMWare and persevere, we can find the cause of the weak performance of hope.

  Here is the specification of

  The virtual computer running server:

  Dell PE R510, 2 x 6 core Xeon 5670 CPU clocked at 2,933 ghz, 64 GB of memory, TB 1.81 storage Raid 5 using 6-disc 7200 tr / MIN SATA 6 g, NICs 4 x 1 Gbit

  Configuration of the VM:

  Windows 7 32 - bit, 2 CPU and 3 GB of memory by the system, we have 3 pools Clone related to the installation of specific software for accounting, Admin, and CAD.

  I can't see were the loss of performance is. Sometimes the users sessions hang for a few seconds when they choose the various functions in the office or AutoCad, then the system is again significant. Other times the screen quality degrades a bit before clear. For some office programs take an excessive amount of time to load and become available. Sometimes to connect or general file / network access is slow, summary record lists taking extended periods to update or view the content. Sometimes of functions such as print and trace take excessive amounts of time before appear in their respective dialog boxes.

  I've attached screenshots of our performance to review statistics. Any help would be welcome.

  Hi Matt,

  Please provide more information.

  On a hardware RAID 5 type 6-pin, your number of IOP on a RAID 5 is about 130 IOPS / s based on an 80% writing / reading of 20% ratio.

  You use 21 workstations more than 130 IOPS / s, then you're essentially allowing for 6 inputs/outputs by the office without any room for overhead.

  Now, if you have moved to 15K SAS with the same amount of battery, you would end up with a result of 304 IOPS / s based on the same report.

  21 offices spread over 304 is 14 inputs/OUTPUTS per desktop, but again, no overhead.

  Essentially, simply by moving to 15 K SAS, you more than double your IO, but your RAID set is not optimal.

  If you went hardware RAID 10 with the same number of PIN, your IOPS / s would rise to 555 based on the same ratios.

  21 workstations more IOPS 555 / s 26 IOPS / sec per desktop computer that comes close to the 30-40 recommended for VDI.

  If you can afford to go 8 x 600 GB 15 K on your R510, surprise you pleasently with performance - he would net you have a 740 IOP account

  21 offices on 740 IOPS / IOPS 35 s / s by the office which is more in line with the recommendation of VDI.

  I mine with a range 40 IOPS / sec per office more overhead, and we have no problem on our end here.

  Do not give up, with a little more work and planning, you could end up with a great platform - we use the R510 is there as well and love them.

  I hope that helps you, it's a great place to ask questions and get answers.

  I'm also on Twitter if you want to ask more questions, more than happy to help you!

  See you soon!

• VMware View 4.6 and vSphere Client performance

  Hello world

  I prepare a demo for VMware View 4.6, a small, with internal disks (3 x 600 GB, 6 GB/s SAS, 10 k RPM RAID 5), network: 100 MB (it was never a problem demos), within IBM x 3650 M3, 32 GB of RAM, 2 x xeon 4 c E5620 2.4 GHz.

  There are 3 virtual machines of Windows 2008 R2 (4 GB RAM and 20 GB disks) and 6 virtual desktops (2 GB RAM) and 30 GB drive XP

  In 10 k RPM there is 150 IOPS / s, so 3 drives x 150 = 450 IOPS / s-> 450 / 9 mV = 50 IOPS / s p/vm. I know that if IOPSp/vm is over 30, it's good, so this seems like a good script.

  I don't know what should I look to find the cause of poor performance.

  VI Client is really slow, and worse even desktop computers.

  Can you guide me to find the problem please?

  Thank you!

  Your latency of storage time seems a bit high, how the store looks like it? Possible alignment issues?

  You have a lot of CPU resources, I'd give workstations an another vCPU.

  Linjo

• VMware view Administrator console... increase timeout

  Hi guys

  just migrated to view 4.5 and everything was fine...

  Is it possible to increase the limit of the Vmware view admin console timeout? I would have the dashboard always on my 2nd screen without going all day logon due to delays...

  Thanks

  Very well, you can do this by following these steps:

  Go to: Display Configuration > global settings > check Activate the automatic updates.

  You'll notice that the heading aid next to him said: "the idle session timeouts not happen when automatic updates are enabled, causing the Administrator display to remain active until the browser is closed or an explicit logout is performed."

  This will allow you to follow the Administrator display without waiting times. (And you don't forget to lock your workstation when you leave your desk anyway, so you should be fine. )

• VMware View 4.5 - disconnected sessions connect to black screen or simply close after 5 seconds...

  In collaboration with VMware View 4.5 using images of Windows XP Pro SP3 and connection through PCoIP, everything works perfectly on cloned VMs with the exception of reconnects.

  If I have a user disconnect from their office and then tries to reconnect to the desktop, the screen will be black, if you act quickly, you can retrieve the screen if you enter any keyboard input, but it will come back as if CTRL-ALT-DEL was pressed as I see the pop-up "Windows Security".  I checked for the screensavers screen or something like that and nothing so far.

  Do not have this problem in 4.0.1.

  Any help would be appreciated!

  Thank you

  Shane

  You have the same problem with a desktop XP vanilla without modification? Are there of the sureties or banner of the GPO applied to these desktop computers?

  May panic if there is a logon banner.

  ____________

  blog.eeg3.net | Useful links related to VMware

  If you have found this device or any other post useful, please consider the use of buttons useful/correct for award points.

• You are looking for advice or suggestions: Vmware View 4 lab on workstation 7.

  Hi guys,.

  I want to build a new laboratory virtualized on a new desktop that I ordered.  I especially want to us to do tests and the growth of knowledge on Vmware View.  I have a desktop HP on order with an i7-930 processor and 16 GB of RAM.  I also have a 7 of my cert VCP 4 Workstation license.

  I already know how build a virtualized ESX environment and allow the MV nested within this environment.  My lesson plans are to build two ESX 4 virtual machines, a VM vCenter, a virtual shared storage as a storage device and a server VMware View connection.   I think there should be enough resources on this box to have a work environment (although maybe slow).  I plan only to have two virtual desktops (XP).  I don't need virtual machines to do something more than it is, run and be able to communicate with them with PCoIP XP.

  I was hoping someone else might have already tried this and had no additional details.  If this isn't the case, I'd love to hear any suggestions.  I intend to document this lab and I'll be happy to share this document with everyone when I'm done...

  Best regards

  Rick

  I have implemented this on a laptop several times. Laptops have 8 GB of memory and it was barely enough to make it usable. ; Your 16 GB of system memory and faster CPU will give you much more room to breathe

  Tip: I cut about 20% of the CPU usage on the ESX host nested running under Workstation 7 on Dell D830 computers laptops with processors T7250 in manually choosing the type of VT for ESX hosts nested rather than leave the setting at the default of Automatic.

  Also, if it is not necessary to VMotion, you could get a super-quick card Flash or SSD and point that flash all the temp, swap files and VSWP files. SSD. Someone has recently published an article on the difference in speed - Google and you will see what kind of speed increase you could get out your configuration if you are willing to spend that kind of money for quick storage.

  Datto

• Connection to the Server VMware View farm doesn't not connections to the foreign gateway server?

  We know a pernicious problem between our

  External security gateway and our internal view connection server.  (I have the terminology right?)

  After a few days of running normally, users trying to get

  to connect to the gateway of external security using the VMware View Client will not

  Download the logon panel.  He invites you to their

  the server must connect, but won't the login Panel and the user

  Finally will get a time-out error.

  Experiments have shown that the only way to solve this problem is

  in the reboot / restart the Server VMware View internal connection.

  Meanwhile, internal users can use VMware view

  Client to connect to the internal server without problems, don't ask that of the

  external server have problems.

  Review the journal on the external sever I hear.

  Information, '102', ' 25/04/2010.

  "21: 55:20", "VMware View", "9", "NT".

  "Connection test AUTHORITY\SYSTEM","(Request1224) AJP failed:"

  com VMware.VDI.ob.tunnelservice.CX: unable to write data to the server: java.net.SocketException:

  "Connection reset by peer: socket write error."

  And then this message is repeated.

  Warning, "104", "26/04/2010.

  ' 09: 08:04 ","VMware View","9","NT ".

  AUTHORITY\SYSTEM"," (Request1236) request failed: "

  com VMware.VDI.ob.tunnelservice.CX: cannot read the server: java.net.SocketException:

  Reset connection. "

  Examine the dumps of the internal server, I see a lot

  connections listed in the external security gateway which in my opinion should not

  exist yet because there are no active sessions.

  TCP 10.1.1.67:8009 123.456.789.123:1274 ESTABLISHED

  TCP 10.1.1.67:8009 123.456.789.123:1294 ESTABLISHED

  TCP 10.1.1.67:8009 123.456.789.123:1300 ESTABLISHED

  TCP 10.1.1.67:8009 123.456.789.123:1311 ESTABLISHED

  TCP 10.1.1.67:8009 123.456.789.123:1312 ESTABLISHED

  .

  .

  .

  Both servers run the 4.0.1 level.

  Someone at - it advice?

  Thank you

  .. .pjpg

  I had something similar happen a year where every two days I have to restart internal broker for connections that was paired to the Security server.   We have opened a ticket with VMware support, and it took a good 5 months to get the issue developed and the solution ended up being to change a value of timeout on the file server.xml on the broker for connections.   I don't know if it's the same problem that you encounter, but if you already have a ticket open with VMware you can refer to our old 1147071161 SR and may save you time.

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

• ThinPro with VMware View USB Redirection

  Hi all:

  I'm trying to configure my workstation (t620 ThinPro 5.1 running) to start required services necessary for USB with VMware View forwarding at startup.  I tried to add the command to /etc/rc.local and created my own init.d script, but none of these options automatically launch services.  Run manually /etc/rc.local and the custom init.d script launches the services successfully.

  Has someone managed to get the necessary USB redirection services running at the start?  Any guidance is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Solved my problem... changed under USB Manager Remote Protocol of VMware View.  Updated this setting caused VMware services to run at startup.