Soft Proof Copies

Similar Questions

• Soft Proofing and adjustment brush / Spot removal problems

  Hello

  Since the last update (at least I think) to 6.5 that I have a problem when soft proofing is turned on. In particular, the adjustment brush and the brush of spotting does not work smoothly. The first problem is that when you try to make smaller or larger brush (keyboard and Tablet) the brush shows the size have immediately brush outside the window or click on the image to see the size of the brush (brush of detachment and adjustment) and the cash withdrawal is very slow and if I want to spend the part I want to remove to make it better appearance it does not update immediately when moving. Also when using either the computer fans brush starts to kick in and work hard. Tried two GPUs and extinguish the same result. but as I turn soon soft proofing off the coast of the brushes as planned work and also the fans to stay out of

  so if someone has problems with these two brushes you might want to look into the option to see if Proofing is enabled

  I have not noticed this. However, I usually do all my withdrawal in cash without proofing turned on. Normally, the only thing I do when the soft proofing is set things like saturation, lights and shadows. Things that affect the overall appearance of printing based on the book that I use. What are the specifications of your computer? OS, RAM, etc.

• Bluescreen when the soft proofing

  I just started to have the blue screen with an X, developing mode, while the soft proofing and seeking the warnings of the range. Proofing also no longer works (image remains the same). Recently made "Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update" and recently upgraded to El Capitan, and this issue seems to be passed eventually. Since having the problem, I've just updated to the latest version of LR, nothing helps. With the help of iMac (mid-2010) with a lot of memory... everything worked fine last week. Here is the system of information displayed on the performance tab in the preferences of LR:

  

  Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

  Sorry for my delay... Thank you for your response. I always have, I could not proofing to work even though he seems to have the right icc profile listed. In fact, the profiles were more where they should be in the ColorSync folder. Reinstalled them, and everything is good to go. GPU is activated and not blue X.

• Where Soft Proofing adjustable and specific documents?

  Hello

  I don't seem to find where the parameters can be changed / adjusted.

  Thank you

  Raphael

  With Soft Proofing on (1) click on the drop down profile menu (2). If you don't see the desired profile choose 'other' and all the profiles that you have available will be listed (3).

  

• [LR 5] Soft Proofing - Gamut Warning monitor vary with the profile of the printer?

  Hello

  There is something that I do not understand when you use the function of gentle fermentation in LR.

  The monitor Gamut Warning feature (top left icon of the histogram when Proofing is enabled) is supposed to show us what colors in the image can be reproduced on the screen. Right? If I understand correctly, the warning is calculated by comparing the current image (virtualized by LR in the Melissa RGB color space) to the display range (read active calibration profile).

  Then why LR different show "out of gamut" areas for display when I change the profile of the printer selected when using soft proofing? It's not logical for me.

  I missed something?

  Thanks in advance.

  Indeed, they are vague on this issue. My thinking on the subject comes to converse with people from Adobe here and elsewhere, as I'm sure that I'vce has discussed this issue on the forum before. As far as I know the caution monitor is supposed to be calculated after the conversion to the profile of the printer so that you get an idea if the soft resistant color is displayed accurately. This must be the correct behavior as waterproofing can really take a color either in or out of the monitor range. I'm not 100% sure on it though, but definitely, he explains how he behaves.

  Also, if you calibrate your screen and write a display icc v4 profile, the situation changes once again as today the display profile can actually contain a perceptual rendering intent, making it even less accurate and the assumption of simple linear conversions one-to-one between color spaces is not valid. Some calibration software packages do however, but there are a few exceptions.

  If you want to know if your image is outside the display profile, you can indeed deceive the test to allow you to select a display as the printer proofing profile profile. In principle, you can select a standard workspace such as prophotoRGB it and get results that make sense. But you certainly don't want to have a random printer profile chosen for the reasons cited above. I guess they could add some tricks to detect that you have selected the profile of the current view and not one profile of another to randomly display and then collapse the interface, but it's a case of edge I doubt Adobe would give priority to this. It works very well so simply, you realize that you have selected your profile screen like the printer proof profile.

• In Lightroom 5, I see "Soft Proofing", "Show Grid" or "Auto" on the bath g mode to develop.

  In Lightroom 5, I don't see "Soft Proofing", "Show Grid" or "Auto" on the bar below the picture I'm in Lightroom 5r.

  Press the letter T to display the toolbar.

• Convert to profile & Soft Proofing.

  Hello

  My apologies if this has been requested and replied. Some responses on proofing looked on the forums has helped, but not hit the nail on the head.

  I am grateful for the ideas, instructions, pointers.

  I. According to the instructions of the printer that prints my work, I have converted my image profiles to Dot Gain 20%. I want to assure you that I see on my screen will have a) be a tight that she (woman, the print job) will see on his screen. and (b) give me an idea of how the print job and the printer (Espson stylist Pro 4800) will interpret. It is logical to me that I should change my format of test for Dot Gain 20%, no?  Have I not this wrong?

  II. I also need to do a series of JPEG files which will be visible on a variety of screens, each with a different brand and calibration. These JPEG files should be as convincing a match to print as possible, with compensation, of course, carried out for the paper, ink, etc. The game should be close. Is there a standard for ever which will allow me to see what is likely to appear on a given screen. An order, I know. I was wondering if I should just inform viewers to display JPEG images with their monitors, assign a certain color profile - or if I should send them a monitor profile as well as JPEG files.

  Thank once again for ideas.

  Best-

  Hardware: iMac 27 "; Native Gamma 2.2. CS6.

  A little guide:

  You will need a valid of monitor profile (MP) and a printer profile (PP) for

  Epson 4800 for a printing (ink, paper, well-defined resolution process

  and much more).

  If your impression people do not have a profile, and then not to print from there.

  A PP contains everything about the Dot Gain.

  Let the images in sRGB (sRGB workspace)

  Edit by PhS until it looks nice

  In the event, choose your PP

  Rendering Intent Relative Colorimetry, Black Point Compensation

  Observe the changes of the image, Soft Proof on / off

  Failure to comply with the warning range, using a color of alarm

  If the changes are strong or / and if the Gamut Warning zones are large

  (not only highlights or some leaves on the trees), then change your image.

  This can be explained by simple means.

  If the image looks nice and save with sRGB embedded profile

  and leave it to print, using exactly the defined printer process previously.

  Test is done by software, here Photoshop, for simulated hardware.

  which is entirely defined by the PP.

  sRGB is a de facto standard for the Web.

  If your images are in a colorful way, then it could be recommended

  working entirely in AdobeRGB (1998) = ARGB.

  Image in aRGB, work space ARGB.

  You can do this after the clarification of this issue with the impression people. Of course

  the aRGB profile must be incorporated, but even in this case, there is a good chance

  the people of print is not familiar with profiles and assumes sRGB as

  Profile of the source.

  Putting, you would need two versions - one for printing, one for the Web.

  Cordially - Gernot Hoffmann

• Soft proofing and color profile

  Dear all,

  problems shall comply with archival ink jet print places I tried. I am now looking at "soft proofing" which I think is not without her pearls. The problems I've experienced before where the images were no converted the profile is that sometimes they would print at great expense properly and sometimes they would not, again at great cost. If the image is converted to the correct profile, in this case Hahnemule, will the embedded profile that the image will print consistently and 2 different days?

  Images must be in Adobe RGB (1998) or sRGB, in both cases with

  embedded profiles, but only one type for each poster.

  The printer must apply 'Use integrated source profile' mode and a

  Destination profile which is valid for the paper and the printing process itself.

  Hahnemühle says almost nothing.

  A few parameters: weight in g/m², resolution in dpi, dithering mode

  (pixelation), CMYK or CMYK + LightC, + LightM, or other combinations with

  several grays, or to Orange and green. Given the fact that inkjet

  In addition, often use a profile of linearization, there is a good chance of

  Errors of the operator.

  This should be fixed in advance. Then the appropriate profile can be used

  for ever.

  IMHO, a wedge of FOGRA control is used for the printing of the evidence,

  which means "simulate the appearance of offset printing with inkjet.

  At least I use the corner of control in this situation. It requires a

  spectrophotometer, incidentally.

  In all cases of doubt I would print a typical image with well known appearance

  in the same process.

  For example, p.4 / p.5 here:

  http://www.FHO-Emden.de/~Hoffmann/a3gencolorhigh.PDF

  Cordially - Gernot Hoffmann

  Regarding the last post #3: If the print operators are not familiar with

  color profiles, then the situation is desperate.

  Post edited by: Gernot Hoffmann

• Soft Proofing alterations occur on Original as well as Image virtual (proof)

  Once softened up, divide the image horizontally and then create an image evidence when asked after the first change.

  However, LR4.4 and 5, both the original and virtual (i.e., proofing image) change.

  For example.  Have the original brightness value 55 l.  Soundproof image is duller.  Increase the brightness in the evidence by 10 to match original. (The numbers are just for explanation)  Now when I compare the images again, original image brightnesss rose 10 also.  This can be seen, of course, on the Panel to develop.

  Now, obviously, proofing works correctly, I think.

  What's not here?

  After making a change to develop in , you should get a dialog box that gives tyou three options:

  - - .

  You select ?

  Then only a virtual copy is created which shows the alteration of the State so that the remains of original without alteration.

  If you select the original image will be changed.

• Once Soft Proofing in LR4 most of my loaded printer profiles is not visible

  I am running LR4 and CS6 on a HP desktop with 4Gig Ram, Win 7 Home, profiling using DataColor monitor

  In CS6, all my printer ICC profiles loaded appear when you configure the proofing...

  

  In the LR4, most of the profiles appear not...

  The problem is that I print on an Epson 7600 CMYK printer with UltraChrome ink and especially on the Web so I need proof for this environment.

  

  The problem is that I print on an Epson 7600 CMYK printer with UltraChrome ink and especially on the Web so I need proof for this environment.

  Pictures of the two different pull-down are attached.

  Currently Lightroom does not support CMYK output events.

• How to change the color of red for areas outside of the gamut in preview soft proof?

  Hello

  I saw asked this question earlier and the response has been to not even bother with the test, but also to export as a JPEG file in RGB color space, and it is the event for you...  (Thanks for the great video, Digital Dog!) ...

  But...  Still, I was hoping to do a little test in the module development mainly in preview... However I am doing the test on a painting of a few tomatoes and the warning of the range and the tomatoes are all just a big block of red.

  I sure hope there is a way to change this color.

  Thank you!

  Anne

  Sorry, it does not exist.

• Proofing for Blurb

  How to configure LR 6 to soft proof images going to the book Blurb module?

  You can download the profile ICC of Blurb here:

  Color management & calibration Center. Correspondence of colors on the screen. Blurb books

  Follow the instructions below to install the ICC of Blurb profile:

  Installation of ICC profile

  Blurb offers several types of paper, but the only printer profile so the benefits of its use are questionable:

  Re: B & W advice book module Blurb

  Also the book LR module converts the sRGB images in the PDF file uploaded to Blurb. This can cause range extra cutting since the Blurb profile has a range that is located outside of the sRGB color space:

  Re: sRGB or better Blurb icc profile for proofing before book module?

  In my experience of the Blurb printing process can cause a slight loss of saturation in blue color deep. Whether or not you can improve it by creating, and "setting" soft proof copies is debatable. My results were pretty good without proofing. Best advice is to use a good calibrator monitor for 100-120 cd/m2, 6500K White Point, 2.2. Gamma, type of ICC Version 2 profile. What has more impact on the output printed Blurb book results that adjustments of proof flexible. YMMV...

  

• Copy of the judgment proof

  For some reason, my LR begins to create copies when I'm not working in the develop module, which is maddening that I find myself with all these copies and only want to make adjustments to my original proof. How to disable this option? I tried settings uncheck > evidence, but that did not work.

  Hi LynneHarty,

  Once in the develop Module, please press "S" key to turn off the test.

  Also, please make sure that see you histogram in the top right corner, not the Soft Proofing Panel when you press "S" key.

  Kind regards

  Tanuj

• Automatic virtual copies

  Why doe LR automatically creates unwanted virtual copies when I make adjustments?

  This is a safety feature deliberate whenever you have Soft Proofing turned on. The appearance of the image changes on the fly, and adaptations made in response to it may be inappropriate for the image when not not visible in the test (and / or in the test to a different output). So the current settings are protected, and a new separate copy is offered instead.

  Press S to turn on or off this world. The normal operating mode is turned off. The background of the document / surround changes to the white paper when the Soft Proofing is enabled.

  Virtual copies made this way are automatically associated with the particular test in effect configuration when they were created and are recognizable to that used as the name of the copy.

• Proofing

  I need help: in lightroom 6, I can't find the compartment where I'm supposed to put on if you have an image soft proofing. Thank you

  In the development module-select option below the photo-

  

  If you do not see this option here button, check "Soft Proofing" with a check mark in the menu drop-down at the end of the tool - bar

  

  The 'Vérification' Panel will appear under the histogram Panel (in module development, not the print module)