Source NAT configuration

Similar Questions

• On the Question of VPN S2S source NAT

  Currently we have a number of implementation of VPN with various clients.  We are NAT'ing range them at a 24 in our network to keep simple routing, but we seek to NAT Source our resources due to security problems.  It is an example of a current virtual private network that we have configured:

  outside_map crypto card 5 corresponds to the address SAMPLE_cryptomap

  outside_map 5 peer set 99.99.99.99 crypto card

  card crypto outside_map 5 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 SHA-ESP-3DES

  card crypto outside_map 5 the value reverse-road

  SAMPLE_cryptomap list extended access permitted ip object-group APP_CLIENT_Hosts-group of objects CLIENT_Hosts

  NAT (inside, outside) static source APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  the APP_CLIENT_Hosts object-group network

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP object

  Home 10.200.125.32

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP object

  Home 10.200.120.32

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host object

  Home 10.30.15.30

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP object

  Home 10.30.10.32

  network of the SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary object

  Home 10.200.10.75

  network of the CLIENT_Host_1 object

  host of the object-Network 192.168.15.100

  network of the CLIENT_Host_2 object

  host of the object-Network 192.168.15.130

  network of the CLIENT_Host_3 object

  host of the object-Network 192.168.15.15

  network of the CLIENT_Host_1_NAT object

  host of the object-Network 10.200.192.31

  network of the CLIENT_Host_2_NAT object

  host of the object-Network 10.200.192.32

  network of the CLIENT_Host_3_NAT object

  host of the object-Network 10.200.192.33

  My question revolves around the Source NAT configuration.  If I understand correctly, I have to configure 3 statements of NAT per NAT Source since there are three different destinations that are NAT' ed.  I think I would need to add this:

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.81

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.82

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.83

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.84

  network of the SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.85

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  NAT (inside, outside) static source SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  Is that correct, or is at - it an easier way to do this without having to add all statements of NAT?  Moreover, any change would be to do on the access list?

  Hello

  To my knowledge you should not create several new instructions from NAT. You should be well just create a new Group 'object' for new addresses your source address NAT.

  To better explain, take a look at your current ' object-group ' that defines your source addresses

  the APP_CLIENT_Hosts object-group network

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary

  Now you can do this sets up a "object-group" that contains a NAT IP address for each of the IP addresses inside the ' object-group ' and 'object' used above. The IMPORTANT thing is that the ' object-group ' that contains the NAT IP addresses is in the SAME ORDER as the actual source addresses.

  I mean, this is the first IP address is in most object - group ' will correspond to the first IP address in the newly created "object-group" for the IP NAT addresses.

  As above, you can simply have the same "nat" configurations 3 as before but you change/add in the newly created "object-group"

  For example, you might do the following

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.81

  network of the SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.82

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.83

  network of the SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.84

  network of the SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT object

  Home 88.88.88.85

  the APP_CLIENT_Hosts_NAT object-group network

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Dev_VIP_NAT

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Dev_Host_NAT

  network-object, object SITE2_APP_JCAPS_Prod_VIP_NAT

  network-object, object SITE1_APP_PACS_Primary_NAT

  Then you add the following configurations of "nat"

  NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts_NAT CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  Static NAT APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts_NAT static destination CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of source route 2 (inside, outside)

  NAT 3 (indoor, outdoor) static source APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts_NAT CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  Note line numbers, we added the above commands. This allows them to enter the upper part of the ASAs NAT rules, and therefore, they will become active immediately. Without line numbers that they will only be used after when you remove the old lines.

  Then you can remove the "old"

  no nat source (indoor, outdoor) public static APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_1_NAT CLIENT_Host_1 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  no nat source (indoor, outdoor) public static APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_2_NAT CLIENT_Host_2 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  no nat source (indoor, outdoor) public static APP_CLIENT_Hosts APP_CLIENT_Hosts CLIENT_Host_3_NAT CLIENT_Host_3 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination

  This should leave you with 3 configurations "nat" who made the NAT source addresses and destination.

  Naturally while you perform this change you will also have to change the ACL Crypto to match the new source NAT. This is because as all NAT is done before any VPN on the ASA. So the destination addresses are Nations United for before VPN and source addresses are translated before VPN.

  If you do not want to make the changes without affecting the connections too so I suggest

  • Add rules to the ACL Crypto for new addresses (NAT) source. Of course, this must be done on both sides of the VPN L2L. You would still be leaving the original configurations to the Crypto ACL does not not the functioning of the L2L VPN.
  • Add new configurations of "nat" above without the line numbers I mentioned who mean you that they wont be used until you remove the "old".
  • When you are ready to be migrated to use the new IP addresses, simply remove the original "nat" configurations and the ASA will start the corresponding traffic for new "nat" configurations. Provided of course that there is no other "nat" configuration before the nine that could mess things up. This should be verified by the person making the changes.

  Of course if you can afford a small cut when then changing the order in which you do things should not matter that much. In my work, that connections are usually not that critical that you can't make these changes almost at any point as it is a matter of minutes what it takes to make changes.

  Hope this made sense and helped

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary.

  -Jouni

• ASA 8.4 (1) source-nat over vpn site-to-site

  I'm setting up a tunnel vpn site-to-site and require nat for the local and remote side. The remote side will be nat to

  10.2.255.128/25 on their face before they reach our network, so I have to only source-nat our servers via the tunnel to them. Should I just do the static NAT, then let the whole subnet through the acl of valuable traffic as the config below? I don't think I should use twice a nat because I'm not trying to make the destination nat on the firewall. Servers with us will 10.2.255.128/25 and I would like to preserve it through the ASA.

  network of the ServerA object

  host 10.1.0.1

  NAT 10.2.255.1 static (inside, outside)

  network of the object server b

  host 10.1.0.2

  NAT 10.2.255.2 static (inside, outside)

  the object server c network

  host 10.1.0.3

  NAT 10.2.255.3 static (inside, outside)

  the LOCAL_SUBNET object-group network

  object-network 10.2.255.0 255.255.255.128

  the REMOTE_SUBNET object-group network

  object-network 10.2.255.128 255.255.255.128

  VPN_ACL list extended access permitted ip object-group LOCAL_SUBNET-group of objects REMOTE_SUBNET

  Thank you

  Your configuration is correct, but I have a few comments.  Remember that NAT occurs before the delivery of your servers will be translated into 10.2.255.2 and 10.2.255.3 and then sent through the tunnel, so your encryption field is correct.

  Is your internet firewall as well? What your servers out of the internet?  They will be translated to 10.2.255.2 and 10.2.255.3 and who will fail in internet routing is.  If these servers access the internet through the firewall, I would recommend a configuration like this for each of your servers:

  network of the ServerA_NAT object

  Home 10.2.255.1

  NAT static ServerA ServerA_NAT destination (indoor, outdoor) static source REMOTE_SUBNET REMOTE_SUBNET

  This will use destination basic NAT for traffic VPN and NAT everything to a public IP address for the internet traffic.  Of course, if this is not your internet connection firewall can do abstraction.

• Dynamic Source NAT for multiple POOLS

  I'm dynamically creating Source NAT with a few pools and Access-list to be translated according to the access list. However, when configure some ACL do not anything. And the ACLs don't "corresponds to" No. I know it would be the right way to apply the ACL at interface with 'ip access-group in and out', but in this case would be impossible to apply an ACL with ip access-group command.

  FurthermoreI tested to the creation of a roadmap named TEST with all the ACL; but impossible to create all the «ip nat inside source road-map...» "with the same name of the road-map. Also check the cisco example: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/network-address-translation... ...

  Set the configurations.

  I need your help

  Thanks in advance!

  I know that common sense would be to apply the ACL on interface with "ip access-group input/output" However in this case would be impossible to apply an ACL with group-access ip control.

  This would not be the right way. An acl applied to the interface is only for filtering of the traffic through the router.

  Try to remove the keyword "log" of your ACL and retest.

  Jon

• Impossible to create Instance Source in Configuration manager (BI Apps 11.1.1.7.1)

  Hello

  During Setup, I created an instance of source for EBS R12.1.3 but I logged in customer ODI Studio and by mistake I deleted "Data Server" of topology that I created in the Source Instance creation/configuration on Configuration Manager (CM).

  He was not intentionally by mistake I deleted. For this reason, I am not able to change the source instance. Once I try to edit when I save it pop-up error "" error: ODI-10182: uncategorized exception during repository access. ". ORA-00001: unique force (DEV_BIA_ODIREPO. AK_CONNECT) violated. "

  His was bug, but they fix after ODI 11.1.1.6.0

  (Metalink note

  1- Note 1545938.1 : ODI-10182 and ORA-02292 errors reported after the unnecessary suppression of data store in ODI 11 g integration Interface

  2 BUG

  https://support.Oracle.com/epmos/faces/BugDisplay?_afrLoop=96427980024293 & ID = 13916069 & _afrWindowMode = 0 & _adf. CTRL-State = 1536syzwe9_437

  )

  However, I tried following cases:

  1 - tried to modify an Instance of Source of Configuration manager (CM) but gave me an error: ' error: ODI-10182: uncategorized exception for access to the repository. " ORA-00001: unique force (DEV_BIA_ODIREPO. AK_CONNECT) violated. "

  2 - tried to create a new database server by using the same Instance of Source of Source on Configuration manager (CM). Failed with the error message: "invalid system Source.

  3 - has tried to re-create the same name server given in ODI Studio with the same name. Failed due to the error: "Data Server Alread exists."

  Then without success so far. I'm currently editing source system Instance but so far without success.

  Versions:

  OBI Apps: 11.1.1.7.1

  OBIEE: 11.1.1.7.0

  ODI: 11.1.1.7.0

  Database: Oracle 11.2.0.3

  OS: Windows 2008 R2

  concerning

  Sher ullah baig

  I am SR with oracle and they offered under the solution, I hope it helps someone.

  How to remove a system from source?

  The user interface for Configuration Manager does not include a way to remove a source system. In the page set of Business Intelligence Applications, you can only add or change a source system.

  By manually removing the source of Oracle Data Integrator system and tables in the main database, you can effectively remove a source system.

  To manually remove the source system:

  1. connect to the base of the application through a utility such as SQL * more or SQL Developer, connected to the same user configured in the data source for WebLogic.

  2. find the source of the source system to remove system identification number by running the SQL code following and looking at the value of the DATASOURCE_NUM_ID column:

  SELECT DATASOURCE_NAME, C_DATA_SOURCE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID;

  3. go to ODI Studio and delete the physical schema associated with the source system.

  4. in Studio ODI go to the respective logical schema:

  2.1 go tab flexfield

  2.2 check for data source digital id flexfield to use by default.

  5. in SQL * Plus or SQL Developer run the following statements where the variable binding,: Bind_DatasourceNumId, is set to the value of the identifier of the source system. These SQL statements can also be placed in a script, if necessary for later use.

  DELETE FROM C_DATA_SERVER WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_DATA_SOURCE_DISABLEDOFFR_REL WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_EXECUTION_PLAN_FACTGROUP_REL WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_LOAD_PLAN_GENERATION_STEP WHERE EXECUTION_PLAN_ID IN (SELECT EXECUTION_PLAN_ID FROM C_EXECUTION_PLAN INCLUDING EXECUTION_PLAN_ID NOT IN (SELECT EXECUTION_PLAN_ID FROM C_EXECUTION_PLAN_FACTGROUP_REL));

  DELETE FROM C_EXECUTION_PLAN WHERE EXECUTION_PLAN_ID NOT IN (SELECT EXECUTION_PLAN_ID FROM C_EXECUTION_PLAN_FACTGROUP_REL);

  DELETE FROM C_SRC_DOMAIN_MEMBER_TL WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_SRC_DOMAIN_MEMBER WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_DOMAIN_MEMBER_MAP WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_PARAM_DW_VAL WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_PARAM_DW_VAL_AUDIT WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  DELETE FROM C_DATA_SOURCE WHERE DATASOURCE_NUM_ID =: Bind_DatasourceNumId;

  COMMIT;

  =========================================

  Concerning

  Sher ullah baig

• Inside Source NAT from the remote host and VPN from Site to Site

  Hi all

  I was in charge of the construction of a vpn tunnel with a firewall PIX of our business partner company and ASA of the other company of the firewall.  Traffic will be A partner business users will access my company Citrix server.  I want to source-pat the user traffic partner company to PIX of my business within the interface to its entry in my LAN to access my company Citrix server.  The partner company will be PAT'ing their traffic from users to a single ip address - Let's say for discussion end is 65.99.100.101.  There is the site to site vpn configuration, and configure nat be performed to allow this traffic in accordance with the above provisions.

  I'm more concerned about the accuracy of the configuration of the domain encryption because NAT is involved in this whole upward.  My goal is to NAT (of the other company company a) ip address to a routable ip address in my company network.

  The fundamental question here is should I include the ip address of real source (65.99.100.101) of the company the user or IP natted (10.200.11.9) in the field of encryption.

  In other words should the encryption field looks like this

  OPTION A.

  permit ip host 10.200.11.103 65.99.100.101

  OR

  OPTION B

  permit ip host 10.200.11.103 10.200.11.9

  I'm inclined to think it should look like OPTION A.  Here's the part of MY complete SOCIETY of the VPN configuration.  I've also attached a diagram illustrating this topology.

  Thanks in advance,

  Adil

  CONFIG BELOW

  ------------------------------------------------

  #################################################

  Object-group Config:

  #################################################

  the COMPANY_A_NETWORK object-group network

  Description company network access my company A firm Citrix

  host of the object-Network 65.99.100.101

  the MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM object-group network

  Description farm Citrix accessible Takata by Genpact

  host of the object-Network 10.200.11.103

  ################################################

  Config of encryption:

  ################################################

  crypto ISAKMP policy 20

  preshared authentication

  3des encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  ********************************

  CRYPTO MAP

  ********************************

  crypto Outside_map 561 card matches the address Outside_561_cryptomap

  card crypto Outside_map 561 set peer 55.5.245.21

  Outside_map 561 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game

  ********************************

  TUNNEL GROUP

  ********************************

  tunnel-group 55.5.245.21 type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 55.5.245.21

  pre-shared-key * 55.5.245.21

  *******************************

  FIELD OF CRYPTO

  *******************************

  Outside_561_cryptomap list extended access permitted ip object-group MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM-group of objects COMPANY_A_NETWORK

  ###########################################

  NAT'ing

  ###########################################

  Global (inside) 9 10.200.11.9

  NAT (9 genpact_source_nat list of outdoor outdoor access)

  genpact_source_nat list extended access permit ip host 65.99.100.101 all

  genpact_source_nat list extended access permit ip host 65.99.100.102 all

  ! For not natting ip address of the Citrix server

  Inside_nat0 list extended access permitted ip object-group MYCOMPANY_CITRIX_FARM-group of objects COMPANY_A_NETWORK

  You must include pre - nat ip 65.99.x.x in your crypto-card, like you did.

  For me, config you provided here looks good and meets your needs.

  One thing, I do not see here the nat rule real 0, but there is the ACL that NAT. probably, you just forgot this rule.

  65.99.100.101 #sthash.mQm0FIOM.dpuf

• Problem with website Source NAT Site policy

  Dear all,

  IAM facing issue with source based nat in Site-toSite VPN configuration.

  We want to access the remote site server 10.67.1.5 from my main server 192.168.210.224, my 192.168.210.224 server need nat with 10.66.102.178 to go to the outside of the remote site. We have done below the configuration and VPN pahse1 and phase 2 sets up very well, but we are not able to access the remote server 10.67.1.5. Phase 2 set up and only the packages are not wrapping decapsulating. Remote site is seen VPN ending the router and the phase 1 and phase 2 implements.

  There is no configured nat exemption. Appreciate urgent help to identify the problem...

  We have tunnels from site to site much operational f... but not the tunnels with policy NAT

  config
  --------
  access list acl - OR line 1 permit extended ip 192.168.210.224 host 10.67.1.5 (hitcnt = 0)
  allowed to access list acl - NOR line extended to 2 ip host 10.66.102.178 10.67.1.5 (hitcnt = 2)

  NAT (inside) 2 192.168.210.224 255.255.255.255
  Global 2 10.66.102.178 (outside)

  Crypto ipsec transform-set OR esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

  card crypto ENOCMAP 22 matches the acl address - OR
  card crypto ENOCMAP 22 set counterpart x.x.x.x
  card crypto ENOCMAP 22 set transform-set
  card crypto ENOCMAP 22 defined security-association life seconds 3600
  card crypto ENOCMAP 22 set reverse-road
  ENOCMAP interface card crypto outside

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
  pre-shared key *.

  ======================================================================

  12 peer IKE: x.x.x.x
  Type: L2L role: initiator
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

  ENOCDC-FW03 # sh crypto ipsec his counterpart x.x.x.x
  peer address: x.x.x.x
  Tag crypto map: ENOCMAP, seq num: 22, local addr: x.x.x.x

  access list acl - OR extended permit ip host 10.66.102.178 10.67.1.5
  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.66.102.178/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.67.1.5/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  current_peer: x.x.x.x

  #pkts program: 2, #pkts encrypt: 2, #pkts digest: 2
  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 2, comp #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
  success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
  Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
  #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

  endpt local crypto. : x.x.x.x, remote Start crypto. : x.x.x.x

  Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 58, media, mtu 1500
  current outbound SPI: 89BAF49F
  current inbound SPI: DB36C4B6

  Hello

  Please try this nat statement below:

  policynat list extended access allowed host ip 192.168.210.224 10.67.1.5

  public static 10.66.102.178 (inside, outside) - policynat access list

  Here is some reference material for policy nat - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/nat_overview.html#wp1088419

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• 506th PIX, no NAT configuration?

  I'm trying to set up a PIX firewall for devices on a valid IP subnet. It is a 506e, with only two interfaces.

  I can't find an example of config and I was wondering if it's because this isn't a supported configuration.

  Pointers?

  Thank you

  Daryl

  Hello

  What you want to achieve, it is possible and very easy to configure. There is no restriction in terms of having no public address on your inside interface. Although you don't want to do any translation that you still may need a static command.

  The minimum config you need would not be nat 0, as some may think, and it works, but only if the PIX cannot be proxy-ARP for the IPS behind the PIX. If the PIX needs proxy-ARP for these addresses, you must configure this way:

  public static 111.111.111.208 (inside, outside)

  111.111.111.208 mask 255.255.255.240

  If you use this command and remove the

  NAT (inside) 0 command it works fine also. The main difference is that, with the static command in place, the PIX not proxy-ARP for the IPS behind your PIX and how nat 0 commands it doesn´t.

  In case you don't need a proxy-ARP you could do with nat 0, but then you have nat 0 on both interfaces to your PIX, so you must:

  NAT (inside) 0 & nat (outside) 0

  Determine if you need proxy-ARP on your border router:

  Is there a route (with the correct next hop) to your edgerouter pointing to 111.111.111.208/28 or your router think it a connected?

  If your router it's a directly connected subnet for some reason (this reason could be that this router is not a classless ip router) then the router wants to send packets to the MAC address and he asks an ARP. In this case the PIX must proxy-ARP.

  Make proxy-ARp is no problem at all for the PIX, cause if you use my first way of configuration, as described previously, then the PIX not proxy-ARP for all addresses in the static command.

  Don t know if this solves your problem, but this could very well be the case.

  Alternatively, you can edit your config here (don't forget to remove the passwords first then) and we can take a look inside.

  Another thing has in my opinion earlier. It could also be the case that your edgerouter has an ARP table that still contains the mappings for the IP addresses which is now behind your firewall. In this case, you need a clear ARP on your border router.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Leo

• What type of Nat configuration?

  Hello, I am puzzled by this NAT type should I use for my PIX515E.

  Our network is a roommate, and we deal with, sites Web and multimedia.

  So on this basis, I am mistaken, that I should not use PAT?

  I assigned the external IP pointing to the internal IP address.

  Is that all I need to configure so that the inside can access outside?

  I have attached a diagram simple of what will look like the network.

  Ok.. If you do not want PAT went for a host or a subnet, you can use what is called exception NAT. for example, the commands:

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access no_nat

  Access-list no_nat x.x.x.0 255.255.255.0 allow one

  the above instructions will be NO pat inside hosts located on the beach of x.x.x.0 out.

  I hope that helps, ahhah plese do not forget to rate if you find the information provided on this forum useful

• Problem with the VPN and NAT configuration

  Hi all

  I have a VPN tunnel and NATing participates at the remote site.

  I have the VPN tunnel from the absolutely perfect traffic from users, but I am struggling to manage the device via SNMP through the VPN tunnel.

  Remote subnet is 192.168.10.0/24

  That subnet gets PAT'd to 192.168.4.254/32

  The subnet to HQ is 10.0.16.0/24

  IP address of the ASA remote is 192.168.10.10

  Of course, as this subnet is NAT would have I created a static NAT so that the 192.168.4.253 translates 192.168.10.10.

  I can see that packets destined to the 192.168.4.253 device address comes to the end of the tunnel as long as the number of packets decrypted increases when you run a continuous ping to the device.

  However, the unit will not return these packages. The wristwatch that 0 packets encrypted.

  Please let me know if you need more information, or the output of the configuration complete.

  When I start a capture on the ASA remote, I don't see ICMP packets to reach the ASA REAL ip (192.168.10.10). Maybe I set my NAT evil?

  Also, there is no Interface inside, only an Interface outside. And the default route points to the next router ISP Hop on the external Interface.

  Hope that all of the senses.

  Thank you

  Mario Rosa

  No, unfortunately you can not NAT the ASA outside the IP of the interface itself.

• Static NAT configuration

  I have VMWare with Windows 2012 R2 VM installation.  I am installing the VM to have a static NAT (DHCP disabled) address and connect to the internet.  I can't understand why it doesn't work for me.  The virtual computer can connect to the internet fine with DHCP active, but once I change to static, using the same IP addresses, it stops working.

  I have modified the virtual network Editor to use a specific subnet and disabled DHCP

  

  Changed the settings for the TCP/IPv4 virtual machine to use a static address

  

  The only thing I noticed is that the host NIC for VMnet8 continues to change its configuration to default.  Even if I change it to the new subnet that he shouldn't come back to 192.168.21.0.

  I tried many different types of configurations, but I can't understand exactly what I'm doing wrong!  This guide of VNE was not very helpful and many other resources did not help much either.

  try to manually configure DNS settings in advanced NAT settings option and check again

• Manager on the source db configuration

  Server source 11.2.0.2
  11.2.0.3 downstream server
  Linux 5.6 both servers
  
  I'm new to goldengate and have been training, but not always including a basic configuration problem.
  
  The training covered how to place extract and replicat so I understand we are going enough. However, it was assumed that the two processes run on the source server and target (respectively). In this case, I understand the role of the process manager.
  
  Here's where I'm stuck:
  1. what the Manager process does the source db server when I have a mining downstream server which has a Manager making the extract etc. ?
  2. What can I configure the Manager to do on the server of db source if all of the bulk of the work is done on the server of mining.
  
  I'm not finding anything on the web that explains how this piece of architecture is the installer...
  
  Should I still configure a handler on the server of db source when I implement a server downstream of mines. I'm starting to think not... because I see no explicit documentation on this subject...
  
  Thanks in advance...
  
  Published by: TonyG on 31 May 2013 05:17
  
  Published by: TonyG on 31 May 2013 08:54

  The appendages through the installation requirements.

• Cannot get NAT configured [simply]

  My host is running Vista x 64 Workstation 6.5.2. My client is Windows XP SP3.

  In my computer, I have the network for the installation of the client adapter to use NAT (default when you set up a new customer).

  My physical network setup is as follows:

  10.1.1.2 - DNS/DHCP/AD

  10.1.1.8 - Portal

  (10.1.1.100 - 10.1.1.50 excluded in DHCP for VMware NAT)

  I want that my host to do the DHCP for VMware customers, I set up on the Host Virtual Network Mapping tab:

  The subnet for VMnet8 as 10.1.1.0

  The DHCP range as 10.1.1.100 to 10.1.1.150

  The NAT to use 10.1.1.8 as the gateway.

  I also changed vmnetdhcp.conf to use my domain name (as it is on my host) instead of "localdomain".

  Then...

  With this configuration, customers can only ping 10.1.1.8. They cannot ping anything else, although they receive an IP 10.1.1.100 to 10.1.1.150

  Can someone help me?

  If you want to use NAT to configure as I told you. NAT means "Network address translation", and this implies that the NAT network needs a different IP network number as the physical network. And as VMnet8 is a dedicated IP network standard TCP/IP Protocol also requires that.

  But as writes asatoran if you want your guests to be domain members better use bridged networks. When you use bridged networking done guest part of your physical network and should have an IP configuration that corresponds to this network (IP address 10.1.1.x, etc.). There is nothing to configure on the host computer or inside VMware on bridged networks as it is with 'host-only' VMnet1 and VMnet8 "NAT".

  If you found this information useful, please consider awarding points to 'Correct' or 'Useful' responses Thank you!!

  AWo

  VCP / vEXPERT 2009

• Access to a virtual computer within a NAT configuration on the network

  Is it supported or not supported methods to access a virtual machine which is within an instance of fusion on the network?

  For example, say that my VM is 192.168.168.34

  I can understand which port is used for NAT translation somehow (i.e.i 4598) and then launch access to this virtual machine across the network using 192.168.168.34:4598?

  Otherwise, any other ideas on how to make this work?

  Hello

  You can redirect the single ports between the host and the VM.

  So if you want access to the X application on your virtual machine, you need to know on which port that the application is listening and forward this port from your host to your virtual machine.

  There was formerly a nat.conf file, located in Library/Preferences/VMware Fusion/vmnet8/in older versions of Fusion, where you can set up port forwarding. Don't know if it's always the right path, as I have no mac here.

  Tim

• Can the NAT of ASA configuration for vpn local pool

  We have a group of tunnel remote ipsec, clients address pool use 172.18.33.0/24 which setup from command "ip local pool. The remote cliens must use full ipsec tunnel.

  Because of IP overlap or route number, we would like to NAT this local basin of 172.18.33.0 to 192.168.3.0 subnet when vpn users access certain servers or subnet via external interface of the ASA.  I have nat mapping address command from an interface to another interface of Armi. The pool local vpn is not behind any physical interface of the ASA. My question is can ASA policy NAT configuration for vpn local pool.  If so, how to set up this NAT.

  Thank you

  Haiying

  Elijah,

  NAT_VPNClients ip 172.18.33.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.33.0 (external, outside) - NAT_VPNClients access list

  The above configuration will be NAT 172.18.33.0/24 to 192.168.33.0/24 when you go to 10.1.1.0/24 (assuming that 10.1.1.0/24 is your subnet of servers).

  To allow the ASA to redirect rewritten traffic the same interface in which he receive, you must also order:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Federico.