Static NAT configuration
I have VMWare with Windows 2012 R2 VM installation. I am installing the VM to have a static NAT (DHCP disabled) address and connect to the internet. I can't understand why it doesn't work for me. The virtual computer can connect to the internet fine with DHCP active, but once I change to static, using the same IP addresses, it stops working.
I have modified the virtual network Editor to use a specific subnet and disabled DHCP
Changed the settings for the TCP/IPv4 virtual machine to use a static address
The only thing I noticed is that the host NIC for VMnet8 continues to change its configuration to default. Even if I change it to the new subnet that he shouldn't come back to 192.168.21.0.
I tried many different types of configurations, but I can't understand exactly what I'm doing wrong! This guide of VNE was not very helpful and many other resources did not help much either.
try to manually configure DNS settings in advanced NAT settings option and check again
Tags: VMware
Similar Questions
-
Static NAT to 10.140.2.0 to 10.240.2.0 via VPN
I need help to set up a static nat device between oursite and seller
oursite has a subnet 10.140.2.0/24 the provider uses for something else. They asked that we nat 10.140.2.0/24 to 10.240.2.0/24 via the VPN, so they will see the 10.140 10.240? any help is appreciated. I think that map crypo acl must be standing as well, we run version 8.2
LOCAL SITE - ASA - TUNEL VPN - ASA - SITE PROVIDER
Thanks in advance
Hello Bbftijari,
In this case, according to the ASA version, but you will need to configure, this way:
Pre - 8.3
1. create groups of objects for use in the ACL,
the LOCAL_SITE object-group network
object-network 10.140.2.0 255.255.255.0the Vendor_SITE object-group network
network-object XXXXXX XXXXXX2. create ACLs, as a condition,
access-list VPN_NAT permitted object-group LOCAL_SITE object group ip Vendor_SITE
3 create the static NAT, call the ACL, so he says "when I come inside outside of LOCAL_SITE to Vendor_SITE, I will result in 10.240.2.0/24.
public static 10.240.2.0 (inside, outside) access-list VPN_NAT netmask 255.255.255.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post 8.3
1 create the network objects and create a static entry:
the LOCAL_SITE object-group network
object-network 10.140.2.0 255.255.255.0the NAT_SITE object-group network
object-network 10.240.2.0 255.255.255.0the Vendor_SITE object-group network
network-object XXXXXX XXXXXX2. static NAT creation,
NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source LOCAL_SITE NAT_SITE Vendor_SITE Vendor_SITE non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
Test and keep me posted.
Please note and mark it as the correct answer if it helped you.
David Castro,
-
Static Nat issue unable to resolve everything tried.
Hello
I have a cisco asa 5515 with asa worm 9.4.1 and asdm 7.4
I have problem with configuring static nat, I have a server inside which ip is 172.16.1.85 and
my external interface is configured with a static ip address.
Internet works fine but cannot configure static nat...
Here's my config running if please check and let me know what Miss me...
Thank you
ASA release 9.4 (1)
!
ciscoasa hostnamenames of
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP 151.253.97.182 255.255.255.248
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
Shutdown
No nameif
no level of security
no ip address
!
interface Management0/0
management only
nameif management
security-level 100
IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
boot system Disk0: / asa941-smp - k8.bin
passive FTP mode
object remote desktop service
source eq 3389 destination eq 3389 tcp service
Description remote desktop
network of the RDP_SERVER object
Home 172.16.1.85
outside_access_in list extended access allow desktop remotely any4 object RDP_SERVER
pager lines 24
asdm of logging of information
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
management of MTU 1500
no failover
no monitor-service-interface module of
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 743.bin
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
no permit-nonconnected arp
!
network of the RDP_SERVER object
NAT (inside, outside) interface static service tcp 3389 3389
!
NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface
Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 151.253.97.177 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Pat-xlate timeout 0:00:30
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
Floating conn timeout 0:00:00
identity of the user by default-domain LOCAL
Enable http server
http server idle-timeout 50
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 managementTelnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
Telnet timeout 5
SSH stricthostkeycheck
SSH 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
SSH timeout 5
SSH group dh-Group1-sha1 key exchange
Console timeout 0
VPDN username bricks12 password * local store
management of 192.168.1.2 - dhcpd address 192.168.1.254
enable dhcpd management
!
a basic threat threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
username, password imran guVrfhrJftPA/rQZ encrypted privilege 15
!
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
maximum message length automatic of customer
message-length maximum 512
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect the preset_dns_map dns
inspect the ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect the h323 ras
inspect the rsh
inspect the rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect the skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect the sip
inspect the netbios
inspect the tftp
Review the ip options
!
global service-policy global_policy
context of prompt hostname
anonymous reporting remote callciscoasa #.
Hello
Change this ACL: -.
outside_access_in list extended access allow desktop remotely any4 object RDP_SERVER
TO
outside_access_in list extended access allowed object RDP_SERVER eq any4 tcp 3389
Thank you and best regards,
Maryse Amrodia
-
Dual active/passive failover of ISP with static Nat on Cisco 1941
Hello world
I'm working on a configuration of a client and I have everything in place right now except the NAT' static ing. The config fails during an ISP to another and track als and routes by default static weighted, the PAT rocking with course to each interface maps. It is, is it possible to switch on the large amount of static NAT entries to the ISP of backup? So far, everything I've read said no because you can have only one entry per ip/port combo, other than another configuration static NAT double server with a different IP address. I just want to be sure before making my recommendations, all thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Brandon
In fact, you can also long as you use standard NAT ("ip nat inside source static") or not NVI ('ip nat static source') for your attackers. You apply the roadmap by the end of the static NAT statement to indicate which interface it should apply to. So, if you have something like this:
ip access-list extended ACL_NAT permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 any ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ! route-map RM_NAT_ISP2 match ip address ACL_NAT match interface GigabitEthernet0/2
Using port 80/tcp for example, you can do this:
ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 y.y.y.y 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP1 ip nat inside source static tcp x.x.x.x 80 z.z.z.z 80 route-map RM_NAT_ISP2
Just replace x.x.x.x with the LAN address of the machine that you are shipping y.y.y.y with the WAN address you are shipping on isps1 and z.z.z.z with the address of the ISP WAN you are shipping on ISP2. The static NAT will be conditional on the roadmap, at this point.
This works with TCP, UDP, and IP forwarding, but does not require that you use an IPv4 address to your WAN address. For some reason, it does not work if you use an interface... so if you're using dynamic addresses, it will be more complicated.
-
I configured a static NAT through my ASA, which for some
reason does not work - I think that the problem is with the NAT or
der rather than the rule itself, but I would be very grateful if someone
could you help me diagnose the problem.
command line, the rule is: -.
static (UKSCMGMT, management) 10.20.20.20 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255 subnet mask
My theory is that anything with a destination address of 10.20.20.20 would be considered to be 192.168.1.2 on the UKSCMGMT interface.
in looking at ASDM rule looks like this
Type the address of the Source Destination interface trans
Static empty management 192.168.1.2 10.20.20.20
There are a few rules exemption related to 192.168.1.2 - but they are host-to-host and should not affect the static translation.
Yes, quite correct. You can configure NAT exemption by network instead of by each host. If you have guests that can be grouped in a subnet, configure as network instructions instead.
-
Static NAT &; DMVPN Hub
Hello
I don't think that will be a problem DMVPN supports the rays behind NAT devices, but I anticipate change my network for reasons of security and redudancy autour and putting a pair of ASA firewalls on my Internet collocation. Right now I have a DMVPN race 3845, NAT & ZBFW. I'm going to remove the ZBFW and move the NAT to the ASA, leaving only the DMVPN hub and routing. If I create a static NAT mapping on my ASA to point to the DMVPN hub that will work?
I think it will be, but I just wanted to be 110% sure.
Thank you!
Hi Brantley,
DMVPN with static NAT on the hub is supported in the installer. Just be awear it there are limits.
1, all DMVPN router, hub and spokes must be running at least 12.3(9a) and 12.3 (11) T code.
2, must use ipsec transport mode.
3, so need dynamic tunnel talk to rays, hub should work at least 12.3 (13), 12.3 (14) T and 12.3 (11) T3 code.
See the configuration guide
HTH,
Lei Tian
-
Hi Experts,
Please help me on this. I enclose my diagram network with this post.
My firewall is cisco ASA 5510 running with version 8.4 of software. I set up static NAT for all three servers (in the diagram, server 1,2 and 3). The question is, the static NAT works only with the first server. No trades do go to other two server (2 and 3). All servers are in the DMZ.When I remove the static NAT for Server 2 and 3, all traffic going to the server with the IP WAN address of the firewall, which means that the dynamic NAT works. I am also attaching the configuration file.
(NOTE: NAT works for the 72.16.34.1 Server)
Kind regards
MartinHI San,
Would you be able to try this workaround: -.
https://supportforums.Cisco.com/blog/149276/asapix-proxy-ARP-vs-gratuito...
I think the problem is with the IP addresses provided by the ISP.
Thank you and best regards,
Maryse Amrodia
-
Tunnel + static NAT problem
Hello:
I configured a Pix501 to establish a tunnel from site to site with a 1710 in the central site and it works fine, except for a small problem. The central site hosts a Domino server that must have an entry static nat to allow servers on the internet to deliver mail to it. So, the problem is that even though I created a road map to avoid NAT in site traffic to site, the static entry seems a priority on the road map and the mail server is always using a NAT. So the SOHO cannot access to him. What can I do to fix this?
I need to use an entry like this:
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.34.22 1352 200.212.0.66 1352
Any help?
Thank you
You must do the following:
(1) create a loopback interface with an ip subnet that you are not anywhere in your network. Leave; s 10.10.10.0/30 say:
loop int 0
IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
(2) create a roadmap to match traffic from the 172.16.34.22 Server destination and from the other side of the tunnel
access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.34.22 host 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
permissible static route map 10
corresponds to the IP 101
set ip 10.10.10.2 jump following (some address to the loopback interface)
(3) implementing the road map inside the interface of the router where you have the server
inter e0/0
Static IP policy route map
That's all
Hope that helps
Jean Marc
-
Cisco IOS - how config static nat to NAT on the VPN
Hello world
I need help.
I configured a VPN site-to site between two routers IOS. One of the routers already had a static NAT (172.16.100.1 inside to the public IP address), but this static NAT prevents remote VPN hosts access to the 172.16.100.1 home as it tries to the response to public IP NAT router configured.
Does anyone know how to use static NAT for the inside to the outside, but don't not NAT inside to outside VPN traffic?
I know how to make using a roadmap for "overload" dynamic NAT, but I can't? t see how you can use a roadmap on the static NAT statement.
You can provide any help would be appreciated.
Chris
Hi Chris
Take a look at the document atatched with gives a few examples of the very thing you are trying to do.
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087bac.html
HTH
Jon
-
Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN
I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.
The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:
interface Vlan1
IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0
list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0
public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access
card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:
public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255
The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.
So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.
What Miss me?
Hello
I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.
I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.
I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.
Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.
Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.
Feel free to ask more if necessary
-Jouni
-
Cannot ping via the VPN client host when static NAT translations are used
Hello, I have a SRI 3825 configured for Cisco VPN client access.
There are also several hosts on the internal network of the static NAT translations have a services facing outwards.
Everything works as expected with the exception that I cannot ping hosts on the internal network once connected via VPN client that is internal IP addresses have the static NAT translations in external public addresses, I ping any host that does not have static NAT translation.
For example, in the example below, I cannot ping 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2, but I can ping to the internal interface of the router, and any other host on the LAN, I can ping all hosts in the router itself.
Any help would be appreciated.
Concerning
!
session of crypto consignment
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
ISAKMP crypto client configuration group vpnclient
key S3Cu4Ke!
DNS 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2
domain domain.com
pool dhcppool
ACL 198
Save-password
PFS
netmask 255.255.255.0
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set-SECURE 3DES esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
86400 seconds, life of security association set
game of transformation-3DES-SECURE
market arriere-route
!
card crypto client cryptomap of authentication list drauthen
card crypto isakmp authorization list drauthor cryptomap
client configuration address card crypto cryptomap answer
map cryptomap 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
NAT outside IP
IP 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.240
cryptomap card crypto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
!
IP local pool dhcppool 192.168.2.50 192.168.2.100
!
Note access-list 198 * Split Tunnel encrypted traffic *.
access-list 198 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255!
Note access-list 199 * NAT0 ACL *.
access-list 199 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 199 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any!
Sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 199!
IP nat inside source map route sheep interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload!
IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 1.2.3.5
IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 1.2.3.6The problem seems to be that static NAT take your nat exemption.
The solution would be:
IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 1.2.3.5 sheep map route
IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.2 1.2.3.6 sheep map routeHTH
Herbert
-
Static NAT problem with PIX501
Hi all
We have problems with our PIX firewall. We have configured PIX 501 with static NAT for our Web server. Here's the running configuration.
6.3 (4) version PIX
interface ethernet0 car
interface ethernet1 100full
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
pixfirewall hostname
domain ciscopix.com
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.26 eq www
access-list 101 permit tcp any host x.x.x.26 EQ field
access-list 101 permit udp any host x.x.x.26 EQ field
pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside x.x.x.28 255.255.255.248
IP address inside 192.168.90.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
location of PDM 192.168.90.0 255.255.255.0 inside
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
static (inside, outside) x.x.x.26 192.168.90.3 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
Access-group 101 in external interface
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.25 1
Route inside 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.90.2 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 192.168.90.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
Terminal width 80
: end
the problem is the configuration, we are unable to access the web server both inside and outside the network.
All input will be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
udimpas
activate icmp backtrace and then ping the x.x.x.26 of the internet. the output should be as below:
3363574:-out ICMP echo request: ID = 21834 seq = 1202 length = 80
3363575: ICMP echo request: external untranslating: inside: 192.168.90.3
3363576: ICMP echo-reply from the inside: 192.168.90.3 ID = 21834 seq = 1202 length = 80
3363577: response to ICMP echo -: translate inside: 192.168.90.3 out:
by doing this, you can 1. Check the nat 2. If the server responds to the internet.
do not forget to allow incoming icmp:
access-l 101 permit icmp any one
-
2 static NAT on the same Interface
I have an ASA 5510 (8.2 (5)) and I'm trying to set up a VPN site-to site of one of our suppliers. The problem I am running into is that they want me NAT one specific to one of our servers private IP, and this server already has a static NAT from the outside of a demilitarized zone. It's the current rule NAT:
static (DMZ1, external) 65.43.x.x 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255
and they want card me 172.28.9.42 on the same server, so I tried to add:
(DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255
but can not because it's a double translation.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hello
It seems to me you must configure a static NAT to politics
Configurations would be as follows
DMZ-POLICY-NAT of ip 10.0.0.3 host allowed access list
(DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static access-list DMZ-POLICY-NAT
Regarding configurations
- Name of the ACL can be naturally you want
- Destination network can be a single host if necessary IP address
- You should be able to configure multiple lines if necessary
Note that you need to have this NAT configuration before the real public IP address command static NAT. You need to remove the existing static NAT to configure the above and add the original.
This is because if you do not configure static NAT of politics first in the configuration, all traffic will keep hitting the normal rule of the static NAT for the public IP address.
-Jouni
-
Problem with the VPN and NAT configuration
Hi all
I have a VPN tunnel and NATing participates at the remote site.
I have the VPN tunnel from the absolutely perfect traffic from users, but I am struggling to manage the device via SNMP through the VPN tunnel.
Remote subnet is 192.168.10.0/24
That subnet gets PAT'd to 192.168.4.254/32
The subnet to HQ is 10.0.16.0/24
IP address of the ASA remote is 192.168.10.10
Of course, as this subnet is NAT would have I created a static NAT so that the 192.168.4.253 translates 192.168.10.10.
I can see that packets destined to the 192.168.4.253 device address comes to the end of the tunnel as long as the number of packets decrypted increases when you run a continuous ping to the device.
However, the unit will not return these packages. The wristwatch that 0 packets encrypted.
Please let me know if you need more information, or the output of the configuration complete.
When I start a capture on the ASA remote, I don't see ICMP packets to reach the ASA REAL ip (192.168.10.10). Maybe I set my NAT evil?
Also, there is no Interface inside, only an Interface outside. And the default route points to the next router ISP Hop on the external Interface.
Hope that all of the senses.
Thank you
Mario Rosa
No, unfortunately you can not NAT the ASA outside the IP of the interface itself.
-
VPN with static nat for a whole subnet
Hey there,
For some reason, I can't do this on the router. Errrr...
I'm trying to config a static nat (many to one), which will be in effect only when traffic needs to go on our vpn tunnel to the remote location.
example:
internal LAN 192.168.0.0
remote network: 10.10.10.0 and 10.10.15.0
When traffic passes over the tunnel vpn - at the remote site, I need to translate my internal network (192.168.0.0) to an ip address 172.16.32.65 static
any ideas?
also on my crypto map ACL, which must be specified for interesting traffic? my local network or static ip address search?
Let me know your thoughts on the matter.
Kind regards
R.
NAT you describe is named PAT or overload, at least in terms of Ciscos...
What you need:
(1) a NAT - ACL when you describe your traffic which should be natted.
(2) a nat pool with your 172.16.32.65 address
(3) a statement-NAT for dynamic NAT inside based on the ACL for the pool
Here are some examples:
Your crypto ACL then referred to the NATted IP as NAT happens before encryption.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Qosmio F50-114 - to upgrade the disk HARD & 8 GB RAM
Good day everyone, My computer has only 1 320 GB HARD drive.Can I added another an or I have to replace it with a new one? and what HARD drive I can use? I also want to update the 8 GB RAM: How can I do?Toshiba F50-114. See you soon
-
Windows went badly wrong on vista update
I have a dell studio laptop, my daughter authorized windows update to update vista, but he was wrong, now it keeps restarting via the update 3 of 3.
-
Reconfigure Aspire SSD caching on Windows 10 v7
Hello I have upgraded to Windows 10 on my Aspire V7 482pg (5861). I installed all the drivers recommended on the support page and have not run into any significant errors. However, this particular laptop comes with an SSD for caching, and I was not a
-
Renew the computer as a new brand.
so I've had my computer for 3 years. It's a basic vista windows. and I want to renew again as a laptop brand new, clear. someone help... Thanks ():
-
Help with the forwwarding port.
I recently bought a CISCO RV042 router. I want the way forward on the same to access my security camera online. The IP address of the router 192.9.200.50 The IP address of the DVR 192.9.200.10 Port TCP 37710 Port UDP 37778 10 HTTP port I tried to add