SSL tunnel with another interface outside

Hello

I want to get a tunnel SSL VPN (with client Annyconnect) between ASA and my PC (internet) on the DMZ interface that does not have the external interface by which I come.

We cannot do it on the external interface because the 443 port is already in use on this interface.

Is it possible to make this kind of configuration on the SAA?

Thank you

Here is a link on how to configure

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a00807be2a1.shtml

For the customer, in the file XLM just add the port number. For example

VPN.mycompany.com:444

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

ASA5510: dhcp-pool with another address interface range

Hi all!

I currently installs an asa5510 for VPN access:

I want the ASA acting as DHCP server for the remote user, now I have an external Interface with an official IP address and the remote user must obtain a private address additional 192.168.x.x for the VPN connection.

So if I want to configure the pool of addresses on the outside interface, it is not allowed, because the pool addresses are not in the same network as the IP address of the interface.

Y at - it no trick or tip to get something like this race?

I have not it's very exotic?

Thanks for your help

Karl

Hi Karl,

So if I understand correctly, you have only 20 Ip addresses, in the pool and also want to provide an ip address to the DNS server for the hosts.

This can be accomplished by:

hostname(config)# isakmp policy 1 authentication pre-share

hostname(config)# isakmp policy 1 encryption 3des

hostname(config)# isakmp policy 1 hash sha

hostname(config)# isakmp policy 1 group 2

hostname(config)# isakmp policy 1 lifetime 43200

hostname(config)# isakmp enable outside

hostname(config)# ip local pool testpool 192.168.0.10-192.168.0.30

!the 20 ip addresses would be mentioned in the pool above!

hostname(config)# username testuser password 12345678

hostname(config)# crypto ipsec transform set FirstSet esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

    hostname(config)# group-policy dns-policy internal

    hostname(config)# group-policy dns-policy attributes

    hostname(config-group-policy)# dns-server

    hostname(config-group-policy)# exit

hostname(config)# tunnel-group testgroup type ipsec-ra

hostname(config)# tunnel-group testgroup general-attributes

hostname(config-general)# address-pool testpool

    hostname(config-general)# default-group-policy dns-policy

hostname(config)# tunnel-group testgroup ipsec-attributes

hostname(config-ipsec)# pre-shared-key 44kkaol59636jnfx

hostname(config)# crypto dynamic-map dyn1 1 set transform-set FirstSet

hostname(config)# crypto dynamic-map dyn1 1 set reverse-route

hostname(config)# crypto map mymap 1 ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1

hostname(config)# crypto map mymap interface outside

This will give the DNS ip from the dns-policy, and a client ip from one of the 20 ip addresses in the pool.
Hope this helps.

-Shrikant

P.S.: Please mark this question as answered, if it has been resolved. Do rate helpful posts. Thanks.

VPN Tunnel problem. external interface has private IP

Hi all

I don't know if it is wired or not!

When our ISP provide us an Internet connection our real IP is configured on the ethernet interface, while the serial interfaces have a private IP address.

The problem here is when I'm trying to configure a VPN tunnel to another router.

Anything in the configuration is smooth, except for the part where I put the serial interface is my outside.

The tunnel is still low coz the IP address will be my private (serial interface) during the configuration on the router counterpart is my public IP address.

So I am woundering is there a way I can force the VPN tunnel to take the IP address configured on the side LAN? Or any other work around?

Building configuration...

Current configuration: 2372 bytes

!

version 12.4

horodateurs service debug datetime msec

Log service timestamps datetime msec

no password encryption service

!

boot-start-marker

start the flash c1841-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 23.bin system

boot-end-marker

!

property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3

property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 2

BA 3des

md5 hash

preshared authentication

Group 2

isakmp encryption key * address 144.254.x.y

!

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

!

map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto

Description Tunnel to144.254.x.y

the value of 144.254.x.y peer

game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA

match address VPN_Traffic

!

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/0

address IP 10.55.218.1 255.255.255.0 secondary (My internal subnet)

IP address 196.219.a.b 255.255.255.224 (my public IP)

IP nat inside

IP virtual-reassembly

automatic duplex

automatic speed

No keepalive

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

no ip address

automatic duplex

automatic speed

!

interface Serial0/0/0

no ip address

frame relay IETF encapsulation

frame-relay lmi-type q933a

!

point-to-point interface Serial0/0/0.16

IP 172.16.133.2 255.255.255.252

NAT outside IP

IP virtual-reassembly

SNMP trap-the link status

dlci 16 frame relay interface

map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto

!

interface Serial0/0/1

no ip address

frame relay IETF encapsulation

ignore the dcd

frame-relay lmi-type q933a

!

point-to-point interface Serial0/0/1.16

IP 172.16.134.2 255.255.255.252

NAT outside IP

IP virtual-reassembly

SNMP trap-the link status

dlci 16 frame relay interface

map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto

!

IP forward-Protocol ND

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/1.16

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/0.16

!

VPN_Traffic extended IP access list

Note Protect traffic Local to any Destination subnet

Remark SDM_ACL = 4 category

IP 10.55.218.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

!

Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

end

This should do the trick.

map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto local-address FastEthernet0/0

See you soon

possible redirect Web SSL VPN to another external ip?

Hi, it is possible to redirect the web ssl vpn to another external ip of my external range or could I do not use the external interface?

For example:

ASA outdoors: 213.23.4.50 (https://213.23.4.50)

Redirect outside: 213.23.4.51 (https://213.23.4.51)

same question to redirect the vpn client ip address external to the other that the IP outside of asa.

concerning

Jason

Jason,

Pretty easy

BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # webvpn
BSNs-ASA5520-10(config-WebVPN) # port?

the WebVPN mode options/controls:
<1-65535>The WebVPN Server SSL listening port. The TCP 443 port is the
by default.

Please note however that your users will use

https://my.domain.tld:port

to connect... even for clientless and SVC.

Marcin

VPN tunnel with only one authorized service

Hello

has got a pix 520 with V 6.22. Now, I created a VPN Tunnel from our server to a

annother company server and I only want to have ssh connection. If it works

pretty good - but the other host, it is possible to connect on our host by

ICMP, ftp, telnet... How can I manage configured my pix to refuse all this

services?

Here is my configuration:

name 10.x.x.x ffmz1_is

name 212.x.x.x conliner_os

conliner_ssh name 192.168.0.250

object-group network conliner

object-network 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

access list on the inside to allow icmp host ffmz1_is a

access-list inside permit TCP host ffmz1_is any ftp eq

access-list inside allow host ffmz1_is udp any eq smtp

access-list inside allow host ffmz1_is host conliner_ssh eq ssh tcp

no_nat list of allowed access host ip conliner object-group ffmz1_is

access-list allowed conliner host ip conliner object-group ffmz1_is

...

crypto VPN 30 card matches the address conliner

card crypto VPN 30 set peer conliner_os

...

Thank you very much

The sole purpose of "ipsec sysopt connection permit" is to allow traffic through a tunnel to bypass access-groups. It is not necessary to use it, but then you must explicitly allow traffic you want through your access list.

The command is very useful when you need to establish a vpn using the cisco customer remotely. Because you must use dynamic crypto maps and you don't know the IP address of the peer, if you didn't have the sysopt command, you will need to allow traffic from an source.

And you don't have to open all ports for the PIX to be able to establish the tunnel with its ipsec peer.

You need to allow udp 500 and protocol 50-51 when ipsec traffic through your firewall. Let's say you have another PIX inside who wants to establish a vpn on your main PIX with a third PIX on the outside, you must open the ports in your main PIX.

Twice NAT on Site at the tunnel with the same private networks.

Hello

Currently, I am trying to configure a Site to Site tunnel between an IOS router and an ASA 5505 running 9.1

When deprived of the IOS router subnet was 10.0.0.0/24 and the subnet private SAA was 172.16.1.0/24, it connected properly.

I'm now putting in place where the two private networks is 10.0.0.0/24 and objects network created, edited the ACL for interesting traffic and created the rule of NAT translation and twice, but the tunnels are not coming. I was hoping someone could shed some light on where I'm wrong.

There are route it (R1) IOS and ASA (F2). Between them is an Internet addresses asking the router which is just set up to allow both sides to achieve their WAN.

R1 and F2 have private network (10.0.0.0/24) need to communicate. Twice NAT can be done on the ASA to allow this, but I have to do something wrong. The way I understand it, is that the R1 should see traffic coming from 10.51.0.0/24 and send to this traffic. The ASA will have this traffic and the inside network should see it coming entering as 10.50.0.0/24. If F2's private network communicates with 10.50.0.0/24, and the private network R1 sends traffic to 10.51.0.0/24.

I turned on "Debug crypto ipsec" and "debug crypto isakmp" but no output is appear or give any indication that she is trying to establish anything.

Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

R1 #show run

version 12.4

hostname R1

crypto ISAKMP policy 50
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
address of cisco crypto isakmp 10.2.0.254 keys

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac L2L_SET

50 CRYPTO ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined by peer 10.2.0.254
game of transformation-L2L_SET
match address CRYPTO

interface FastEthernet0/0
10.0.0.253 IP address 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
IP virtual-reassembly
IP ospf message digest authentication
Cisco IP ospf authentication key
automatic duplex
automatic speed

interface FastEthernet0/1
IP 10.1.0.254 255.255.255.0
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
IP ospf message digest authentication
Cisco IP ospf authentication key
automatic duplex
automatic speed
Crypto card CRYPTO

IP classless
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.0.253
IP route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.253
!
!
IP http server
no ip http secure server
overload of IP nat inside source list SHEEP interface FastEthernet0/1
!
IP extended CRYPTO access list
Licensing ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.51.0.0 0.0.0.255
SHEEP extended IP access list
deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.51.0.0 0.0.0.255
allow an ip

=========================================================================

See the F2 # running
: Saved
:
ASA Version 9.1 (1)
!
hostname F2
activate 3a57ZsZ4Kgc.ZsL0 encrypted password
3a57ZsZ4Kgc.ZsL0 encrypted passwd
names of

interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 10.0.0.254 255.255.255.0
!
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP 10.2.0.254 255.255.255.0

network of the PRIVATE object
10.0.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

network of the PARTNER_PRIVATE object
10.0.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
network of the PARTNER_VPN_INBOUND object
10.50.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
network of the PARTNER_VPN_OUTBOUND object
10.51.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

Access extensive list permits all ip a OUTSIDE_IN
CRYPTO extended access list ip 10.0.0.0 allow 255.255.255.0 10.50.0.0 255.255.255.0

NAT static (inside, outside) PARTNER_VPN_OUTBOUND PRIVATE destination static source PARTNER_PRIVATE PARTNER_VPN_INBOUND
!
network of the PRIVATE object
NAT dynamic interface (indoor, outdoor)
Access-group OUTSIDE_IN in interface outside
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.2.0.253 1
outdoor 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.2.0.253 1
the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac L2L_SET ikev1
Crypto ipsec pmtu aging infinite - the security association
crypto L2L_MAP 50 card matches the address CRYPTO
card crypto L2L_MAP 50 set peer 10.1.0.254
card crypto L2L_MAP 50 set transform-set L2L_SET ikev1
L2L_MAP interface card crypto outside
trustpool crypto ca policy
Crypto ikev1 allow outside
IKEv1 crypto policy 50
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400

tunnel-group 10.1.0.254 type ipsec-l2l
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 10.1.0.254
IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
```
object network PRIVATE

    subnet 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
object network PARTNER_PRIVATE

    subnet 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

    object network PARTNER_VPN_INBOUND

    subnet 10.50.0.0 255.255.255.0

    object network PARTNER_VPN_OUTBOUND

    subnet 10.51.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list OUTSIDE_IN extended permit ip any any

    access-list CRYPTO extended permit ip 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.50.0.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside,outside) source static PRIVATE PARTNER_VPN_OUTBOUND destination static PARTNER_PRIVATE PARTNER_VPN_INBOUND
```
Here in nat rule u use subnet PARTNER_PRIVATE, which is the same as a local, so the devices never send this traffic to the ASA, cause they know that this subnet (10.0.0.0/24) is in their local subnet. Therefore, you must write the nat rule in this way (i.e. the change of objects Web places):
```
nat (inside,outside) source static PRIVATE PARTNER_VPN_OUTBOUND destination

static  PARTNER_VPN_INBOUND PARTNER_PRIVATE
```
So the hosts on the subnet behind ASA will see the hosts on the subnet behind SRI as 10.50.0.0/24 and trying to reach the subnet behind SRI, you must use the 10.50.0.x one-to-one wich addresses correspond to 10.0.0.x it.

In addition, your proxy-acl on asa must use post-nat addresses, which should look like this:

IP 10.51.0.0 allow CRYPTO access list 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

Qosmio X 500 - 10W - can I replace the HARD drive with another?

Hello

I have a Qosmio X 500 - 10W with two drive HARD Toshiba MK5055GSX 500 GB 5400 RPM 8 MB? SATA II but is one of the hs so I'm wondering if I can be replaced by a more powerful style, drive HARD 750 GB 7200 RPM / min 16 MB Toshiba courses?

Thank you

Hey,.

Your question is a bit hard to understand, but I think you want to replace the HARD drive with another (faster) model, right?

Well, that s no problem. 7200 RPM hard drives works, they are a little stronger, but they're faster so if you need more performance without problem.
750 GB or more are also no problem because the SATA interface is not the limited capacity. Theoretically 1 TB or more should also work.

Anyway, you can buy the 750Go you mentioned that it will work. :)
?

SSL Tunneling Application outgoing failure

Outgoing SSL Tunneling Application error

Hello dear colleagues,
I have UTM5 with the latest firmware. The unit works fine now with 3 VLANS / subnets, routing inter - VLAN, SSL VPN configuration, etc. I have an interesting question, but probably one of these questions to someone else experienced and solved (I hope).

Medical practice I have set this up for actually needs of outgoing VPN tunnel/SSL. I encouraged the VPN on UTM protocols so the initial remote OUTGOING connection goes off flawlessly and allows users to authenticate. My question is when we try to show the remote Citrix server/published apps page. I get an error "request the Tunneling SSL - Failed to connect to server" . I know that the issue must be understood with the ProSecure UTM because I've temporarily removed the UTM equation and put in a D-Link DIR - 655 and Citrix published apps portal page launches very well. I am able to launch a published application and function normally. I pass on the D-Link with the Prosecure and I get the same question.

I really don't understand what prevents to launch published applications page.

I'd be more than happy to provide more information that I need to solve this problem.

Not that it is important, but all endpoint devices are XPSP3/IE8. Yet once, shouldn't matter that customers can bring to the top of the published page no problem when the D-Link is used.

Thank you
MED

ADIT, I've really hemmed and best enemy cela and managed to get a solution in place. Curious, if you have an idea on the terminal services question license I have known which I'll explain a little.

So, I have disabled HTTPS scanning as you said and it helped the citrix portal page to come; However, the user received an error of connection application failure when they launched an app on the page. The error said that there are not enough licenses available Terminal Server. I am as there is no way in hell that all licenses are in use.

So I completely disconnected from the remote network via SSL - VPN and not connected from my home network this site remote to see if I would have the same result and no problems to launch the applications of the portal page... basically no problem license Terminal Server services. I tried connecting from the prosecure and received the same error message.

I wanted to keep HTTPS enabled analysis despite connect it secure by nature implemented with 443, so I spotted around based on your advice and added 4 remote domains to exclusions scan tab (my eyes completely spent during this 1st 10 x (very annoying). I tested the outgoing connection and it helped me successfully citrix portal page, but applications would not launch successfully. I received once again the same error of license to the Terminal Server services, but we expected it because it didn't start with the scanning to disabled .

so I connected to the remote network and thought that I would allow my client to its remote desktop RDP access. I have configured RDP on his computer to Office XP and the connected failed. I thought at this stage that he had something to do with trying to RDP through the Microsoft UAG gateway used by the remote site. Rather than trying to work through sets of rules with the specialist support network out there, we decided to allow my client to run an IP network connector dry which was all ready helped the UAG. This enabled him successfully to RDP to his remote desktop and run any distance needed applications on the remote network.

So, it's not what I really wanted to do. I really want to start individual applications of the closed Citrix portal page, but why this issue licenses arose himself the Terminal Server services is a mystery to me. The specialist in support of the remote side has been also blocked down there. He informed me that he has other clients that connect out through boxes of CISCO ASA and they have any problems launches applications of the portal page. If they scan you 80/443 traffic is not relevant because I disabled it completely on the UTM and it did not help.

So any thoughts on that would be great and I once again thank you for your expertise.

Satellite L670-1HD - problem with audio interfaces USB 1.1

Hello

I have a Toshiba L670-1HD with an Intel HM55 chipset, and an Intel Core i5 460M processor. I use this machine for my music software and that's why I use different audio interfaces external and USB-MIDI-Controller with build in audio interface like Mixvibes U - Mix Control Pro (http://www.mixvibes.com/content/u-mix-control-pro). These built-in audio interface are connected via USB 1.1. Always when I use this audio interfaces interfaces crash audio internalt - the sound is cracked very hard and there are noises in. The controller of all crashes sometimes too.
When I use another interface audio as an audio interface Hercules DJ Trim 4 & 6 (http://www.hercules.com/uk/DJ-Music/bdd/p/102/deejay-trim-4-6/), which is a USB 2.0, everything works fine. No crashes, no cracks and no noise.
You could say now that there is no problem and I should stick to the Hercules interface if it does no problem. The problem is that the Hercules is an audio interface only, there is no controller in it with which I can control my music software.

I've updated all the drivers from the support page of this site without success. Is there a solution available or the Toshiba knows this subject? Am I the only one having this problem?

Would be nice if a Toshiba official support employer could respond to this message. But this does not mean that I don't want to read somethng submitted by the user for which an index - all Board/Council/recommendation is welcome.

Thanks in advance for the help!

See you soon,.

Stefan

Hello Stefan

In my view, you see the problem from the wrong point of view.
Toshiba and each laptop manufacturer offer product and hardware and software support. So if there is a general problem with the functionality of the material you are by Toshiba on the right address.

You use a third party and that you have some problems. Do you really believe Toshiba should support you and help to get this external peripheral work? In my opinion not. On the market, there are thousands of different devices and laptop computer how of the manufacturer must be able to test each of them and offer a solution?
Something like that is definitely not possible.

In my opinion, you should communicate with Mixvibes and ask for help. They have the best experience with own product and I presume that they are testing the features on different PC/laptop platforms.
They should know how the device should work on new laptops with USB 2.0.

It seems silly now, but Toshiba has nothing to do with it. If you have a general problem with the USB ports and they don t work with different devices that Toshiba should ask for help.

Try to pay my subscription to Xbox live with another card, the payment option freezes.

Original title: freezing payment options

I'm trying to pay my subscription to Xbox live with another card that the original one was cancelled. When I pay the screen goes to a standby screen and stays there forever. (with the small blue dots going round and round.

I WAITED 5 hours and nothing happened... !!

It is not also give me the ability to switch to another card will not let me add another option.

Help, please.

Hello

Your Question is outside the scope of this community, as we have nothing to do with the Xbox...

I suggest that repost you in the correct forum.

"Xbox a Preview program FAQ.

http://support.Xbox.com/en-us/Xbox-one/system/Xbox-update-preview-FAQ

'Home'

http://forums.Xbox.com/

"Xbox forums.

http://forums.Xbox.com/xbox_forums/general_discussion/f/3817.aspx

_________________________________________________

"Xbox Forums directory.

http://www.Xbox.com/en-us/forums

General
- Home/FAQ/Forum policy
- Community general discussion
Material & Discussion Services
- Equipment & Services
Xbox support
Agent hours: M - F 09:00-17:00 PT
Law enforcement forums
- Xbox 360 account Suspensions & Console bans
- Account Xbox one & measures Console application
Technical support of Xbox Live rewards
Xbox Live rewards Squad hours: M - F 09:00-17: 00 PST
- Xbox Live rewards program announcements
- Xbox Live rewards Questions
See you soon.

HP Photosmart 5514: HP Photosmart "in use with another task' error.

I'm sure you're all sick to see these questions, but I have not found that a reliable solution among the responses presented anywhere else on the internet.

I have a printer HP Photosmart 5514, part of the 5510 B111 d e-all-in-one printer series, and it currently only allow me to scan a single document (with multiple pages). I connected via USB, not the network connection. My current operating system is Windows 10, 64-bit. I've uninstalled and reinstalled the drivers several times, using different methods: a part of the HPSolutionsFramework, installation of the manual pilot on its own and even with the method of detection of device HP Support Assistant. I tried the most common answer of "unplug, restart the computer, plug in. I also tried printing HP and doctor Scan to see if there is a driver problem but it clears all controls and nothing seems to be wrong. To be clear, restarted my computer "solve" the problem, even temporarily and no is not a final solution to my problem.

Explanation of the issue:

I run the HP Photosmart 5510d series software and click on the button "scan a Photo Document or". When the window opens, I click on "scan document to the file" and proceed to scan my document with however many pages, adding each page I want. When I'm finished, I hit 'save', my backup file and click 'done '. When I proceed to scan another document, hit the button causes nothing happen but one his mistake. When I start printing HP and Scan doctor and trying to do an analysis of test after he tells me that everything is going well, I get the error message:

"The HP scanning application is currently in use with another task or another user on this computer. Please wait until the other task is finished, and then try again. »

To be quite clear, there is no other task that I'm aware of in addition to the fact that somehow the software does not seem to let go of the analysis. There are no other users who use the computer outside of me. There is no other hidden running application. I went through the Task Manager to kill all the associated HP process to see if something it stops to run again. The only chance I have is with my computer restarts, but it would be foolish to scan documents of mass and restart after each.

It worked properly on my other hard drive with the same version of Windows 10 installed on it. 10 Windows installed on a new drive and it does not appear to want to work after 1 document.

If anyone has a help in this case, it would be greatly appreciated.

Hi @Yenroh,

Welcome to the Forums of HP Support!

I see that you are able to scan with your HP Photosmart 5514 printer wireless. I'd be happy to see this with you and don't forget to come back to this thread and check "Accept as Solution", if I have successfully helped solve you the problem. If you want to say 'Thank you' to my effort to help, click on the "thumbs up" to give me a Kudos.

Generally speaking, the reason why you get "the HP scanning application is currently in use with another task or another user on this computer. Please wait until the other task is finished, and then try again. "is because that the network signal is lost the connection and the freezing of the task analysis or the previous scan operation never ended.

Please, try the steps in these guides:
- Scan network connection is lost (Windows)
- "Scan cannot be performed because another program or computer uses the network device" message in Windows when scanning on a wireless network
TIPS:
- Move the printer and the router more closely in order to improve the quality of the signal.
- Change the channel on the router wireless.
Ensure that your router and firewall do not block these ports.
- Scanning: The UDP port: 427 TCP ports: 9220, 9500
Please reply to this message with the result of your troubleshooting. I can't wait to hear strings attached good luck!

PIX 515 with several interfaces see each other

Hello

I realize that this question has been asked in different ways, but I have yet to see my way. My problem is we have a pix515e with 6 interfaces, all interfaces can go out to the outside world very well, but they can not cross to the other. We do not have any router behind them, we 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.1.1, etc. as interface id how to see the other side of the other I need 2 interface see interface servers and even inside. Also how can I get ip addresses translate. for example we have a mail server on the inside interface with 10.0.0.60 translated in X.X.X.60 on the external interface if the outside world can see. Computers of the interface 2 see this machine as X.X.X.X.60 not the fact that it is on the interface right next to her, and therefore can not find. Inside machines translated at 10.0.0.60 address please help. and I hope that this can be done without routers behind the pix.

Sincerely

Jim Kiddoo

Hello

is it possible to display your config? It would be much easier :-)

Please replace the public ip and remove the passwords. Thank you!

Kind regards.

ASA5520 and ACS 4.0 - AnyConnect WebVPN (Clientless SSL Tunnel) does not downloadable ACLs (DACL)

I'm having a lot of problems called "Clientless SSL-Tunnel" AnyConnect VPN sessions - i.e. those that are enacted by visit https:// via a browser, and let the Java/ActiveX plugin will automatically run Fat Client AnyConnect VPN for you - downloadable ACL honor.

Our installation is integrated via RADIUS Cisco ACS 4.0.

Dynamic group-> connection profile strategy seems to work for either (direct according to AnyConnect VPN Client heavy or indirectly via a browser-> /Java Client ActiveX), however, our only downloadable ACL take affect if the user instantiates the SSL VPN via AnyConnect VPN Client Fat; first of all, users who access the site through the "Browser-> https://" route seem to have no ACLs applied to all?

I understand that I can change the custom "Cisco VPN/3000/etc" parameters RADIUS, such as 'WebVPN-filters' and 'WebVPN-Access-List' to apply an ACL configured locally on the firewall of the SAA, but what I have to configure to make the sessions ' WebVPN/Clientless-SSL-Tunnel"to honor the DACL that sends our ACS?

It is a known problem with some Software ASA Versions see bug cisco CSCtv19046 - DACL is not applied to acre during connection via the Web portal. You probably need to update your ASA 8.4 (4.1) or a later version.

Several Tunnels with the same distance network & destination in cryptographic maps

This maybe a newbie question, but I don't have production systems and don't really have a way to test our properly. We have an ASA 5520 with several tunnels from site to site. We already have a tunnel with one of the remote networks in 10.100.90.14. We have this IP on a subnet configured as remote network and the destination address in the card encryption. We also exempt rules NAT in place for our local network with the 10.100.90.14 address as the destination.

We have another tunnel that must be built and who will have a different address peer, but that requires a large number of subnets and at least we'll have the same remote network/destination address in the map encryption and VPN tunnel that we already have in place.

Is this possible to do with a tunnel of site to another without a static or dynamic NAT to a different IP address?

I know, with physical networks, that it is impossible because of the static routes that are in place, but with the ipsec tunnels I'm not sure how it works, and as mentioned, I'm not able to test it.

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Bill

The acl crypto map defines interesting traffic. If you have the same destination IP address, IE. 10.100.90.14 then if the source IE. the IP address of the client on your network is identical for the two tunnels, then no, it won't work and you will need to make some sort of NAT for one of the tunnels.

Jon

Split tunnel with ASA 5510 and PIX506.

Hello

I have the production between Asa 5510 (main office) and Pix 506 VPN tunnel. It is configured so that all traffic is encrypted and moves through the tunnel. This includes remote users behind Pix Internet traffic. I would like to use split tunnel and direct Internet traffic hitting the web directly from Pix instead of going through the tunnel. How can I do this safely? Please see current config Pix below:

:
6.3 (5) PIX version
interface ethernet0 car
interface ethernet1 10baset
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

clock timezone EDT - 5
clock to summer time EDT recurring 2 Sun Mar 2:00 1 Sun Nov 02:00
No fixup protocol dns
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol they 389
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
No fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
no correction protocol tftp 69
names of
allow VPN 192.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 ip access list one
LocalNet ip access list allow a whole
pager lines 20
opening of session
monitor debug logging
logging warnings put in buffered memory
logging trap warnings
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside 24.x.x.x 255.255.255.0
IP address inside192.x.x.x 255.255.255.0
IP audit name Outside_Attack attack action alarm down reset
IP audit name Outside_Recon info action alarm down reset
interface IP outside the Outside_Recon check
interface IP outside the Outside_Attack check
alarm action IP verification of information
reset the IP audit attack alarm drop action
disable signing verification IP 2000
disable signing verification IP 2001
disable signing verification IP 2004
disable signing verification IP 2005
disable signing verification IP 2150
PDM logging 100 information
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 0 access-list LocalNet
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.x.x.x
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Sip timeout - disconnect 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac AMC
map UrgentCare 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto
card crypto UrgentCare 10 corresponds to the VPN address
card crypto UrgentCare 10 set counterpart x.x.x.x
card crypto UrgentCare 10 value transform-set AMC
UrgentCare interface card crypto outside
ISAKMP allows outside
ISAKMP key * address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 netmask
ISAKMP identity address
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20
ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption
ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash
20 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400
SSH timeout 15
Console timeout 0
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:9701c306b05151471c437f29695ffdbd
: end

I would do something by changing the acl that applies to your crypto card. You want to know what you want to support above the tunnel and then deny other networks.

If you have:

192.168.3.0/24

192.168.4.0/24

10.10.10.0/24

172.16.0.0/16

Do something like:

VPN access list allow 192.x.x.x ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

VPN access list allow 192.x.x.x ip 255.255.255.0 192.168.4.0 255.255.255.0

VPN access list allow 192.x.x.x ip 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0

VPN access list allow 192.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 ip 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0

Then when the traffic is destined for something other than these networks, it will go not to the ISP instead of the tunnel.

HTH,

John

SSL tunnel with another interface outside

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for