Similar Questions

• Show VLAN configured on the specific Service profile

  Hello

  I've been trying to figure out how I can check what VLAN, I assigned to each profile service through CLI. I have no trouble with that view through the GUI, but there are so many clicks to check each server (10) with its NETWORK (2) cards.

  Anyone know how this is possible?

  And Yes, I have configured vNIC air with the VLANs mapped to them for the last two blades but I've not had the chance to change this settings on my first 10 profiles =).

  2.0(1t) running

  Thank you!

  Martin

  Martin,

  Hope that this helps out you

  See the configuration | egrep-i ' enter vnic. Service-pr | ETH - if '

  This shows that the VLANS configured explicitly for each vNIC under a service profile. I have not tested with the service with vNIC political profile.

  Alternatively, if you are interested in service under an organization profiles

  scope org.

  See the configuration | egrep-i ' enter vnic. Service-pr | ETH - if '

  HTH

  Padma

• SG300-20 - configure DHCP on the interface VLAN

  I have read the different partners of the discussions on the SG300 and SG500 going on regarding the high setting of VLAN and DHCP on VIRTUAL networks.  For some reason, I could not get even this simple task to work.

  First thing I did was update my version firmware and boot as follows:

  SW version 1.3.7.18 (date of 12 January 2014 time 18:02:59)

  Start the 1.3.5.06 version (dated 21 July 2013 times 15:12:10)

  HW version V02

  When I rebooted the SG300 after the SW/Boot updates the boot configuration has been crushed and I had to configure my switch from scratch.  The intention is to have two VIRTUAL networks:

  VLAN 1: all the devices, servers, etc.

  VLAN 2: subnet basis which distributes DHCP addresses

  The SG300-20 is connected to a router Asus RT-AC66U on the 192.168.1.x subnet and provides access to the internal network and WiFi access (IP address of the router is 192.168.1.1 and the default gateway).  Everything works without any problem.  So my task is simply to create 2 VLANS on 192.168.2.x subnet and use DHCP to assign addresses.  I spent many hours on it and I still can't get it to work.  When I connect a laptop to the port (GI8) assigned to 2 VLANS, I end up finding a few wobbly 169.254.x.x address.  I definitely thought something would not 'easy' that hard to set up, but apparently I was wrong.

  The SG300 is running in mode L3 as shown in my running-config below.

  Someone gets to see something which could prevent my client from the laptop to receive the interface VLAN 2 DHCP IP addresses that are not on the 192.168.2.x subnet?

  Any ideas / suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

  Here's my running-config:

  config-file-header
  MYSTICSW1
  v1.3.7.18 / R750_NIK_1_35_647_358
  CLI v1.0
  router adjustment system mode

  SSD of encrypted file indicator
  @
  SSD-control-start
  config of SSD
  control of password file unrestricted SSD
  no control of the integrity of the file ssd
  SSD-control-end cb0a3fdb1f3a1af4e4430033719968c0
  !
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 2
  output
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00d01e Pingtel_phone___
  VLAN voice Yes-table add Polycom/Veritel_phone___ 00e075
  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___
  Hello interface range vlan 1
  hostname MYSTICSW1
  host 192.168.1.15 record
  logging source hostname id
  username privilege 15 b4a0fcf20b2cd9d80a55b06ab8f83277f9733904 encrypted password cisco
  location of the SNMP-Server Office
  clock timezone ""-5
  DST Web recurring U.S. clock.
  clock source sntp
  unicast SNTP client enable
  unicast SNTP client survey
  survey of 192.168.1.10 SNTP server
  !
  interface vlan 1
  IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
  no ip address dhcp
  !
  interface vlan 2
  name MysticWAN
  192.168.2.254 IP address 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface gigabitethernet8
  switchport mode access
  switchport access vlan 2
  !
  output
  Default IP gateway 192.168.1.1

  Thanks in advance!

  Clint Lambert

  Clint, please see this post

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/4178990#4178990

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful
  http://blogs.Cisco.com/smallbusiness/

• a vSwitch does support internal traffic between the VLANS configured on the same vswitch?

  Hey gurus - I know that the virtual machines on the same port group will communicate internally - but a vSwitch will support internal communications between virtual machines on different VLANS configured on the same vSwitch?  Looking for definitive answers only.

  gman

  Welcome to the MSFN - no traffic is not internal when communicating through different VLAN-

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Having trouble getting the voice VLAN on the switch X1052P to work at all

  Can someone help me understand how to set up the voice VLAN X1052P? I spent several hours trying to get this working and it does not work. I spent about 4 hours on the phone with a Dell technician that night and he couldn't get it to work and finally gave up. He told me that I had to spend my warranty to ProSupport because he did not know how to solve the problem. What group of *. It's a simple configuration of VLAN. What must be so picky about? In any case...

  Setting up the VIRTUAL LAN must be fairly simple, but apparently on this switch is not. The user guide page 406 is not very useful except explaining what the different options. I must admit I am not an expert VLAN so I dunno I've misconfigured something. But remember, Dell technology could not operate either.

  Here's my situation... I have VoIP phones on my network connected to a network wall jack. Connected to phones are my computers of users. The computer of the user and its respective VoIP phone, both share the same data cable. Before replacing Cisco managed Internet service provider spend all it worked well. The problem is that they had direct access to our network so I removed the switch and installed the X1052P in its place. I talked to the ISP to let them know what I'm doing and they said everything I had to do was setup VLAN ID: 15 for the voice VLAN because this is the VLAN ID that the router uses to route telephone traffic. Router PSI is also the server DHCP VLAN 15 and issues IP for phones using 172.27.0.0/24 with a DHCP 172.27.0.50 range - 150.

  I tried to configure the switch using parameters of VLAN static and settings VLAN voice and neither one also seems to do what I want it to do.

  Network administration > VLAN > VLAN static

  Network administration > VLAN > Voice VLAN

  I activated the profile 'phone' on ports I want to added to the voice VLAN and it does not work. Moreover, 47 the switch port is connected directly to the ISP router and is configured as a trunk with the default port VLAN 1 unidentified and tag VLAN 15. For other ports I tried the general implementation, access and trunk of the parameters on each port to see if I could get something going and still nothing happens. When I set up the ports as General ports VLAN, I made adding VLAN VLAN 1 and VLAN 15 as a VLAN tagged not marked. It still does not.

  This is the short story from where I am now. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  FYI, as a follow up I finally solved the problem. I hope this information helps someone else that can encounter the same problem.

  After buying the ProSupport warranty upgrade ($121 out-of-Pocket mind you) and addressing a total of 4 technicians ProSupport expert technician a 3rd another level (only available via chat message between one of the ProSupport phone technicians and the 3rd Tier expert tech - i.e. I couldn't talk or chat with this person me) the consensus was that the material must be bad. When I bought the X1052P I bought two of them, so the best way to know if it was a bad switch was simply configure the other switch and see if the behavior occurs on this one, too. Well, this switch also restarted each time I assigned the profile 'phone' to more than 13 or 14 ports in the switch. It seems that it was not a hardware problem after all.

  I went back to the switch original and tried new things hoping that I could fall on a solution and it turns out that the solution was NOT to use the voice VLAN on the switch. It does not work!

  SOLUTION: I set the VLAN ID: 15 manually and no has not assigned any phone profiles to one of the ports. This is how I solved the problem.

  So he has bad software on the switch. I tried to see if there are updates of the firmware on the Dell support site, but there is none. Configure manually the phone VLAN was the solution. What a freaking nightmare which turned out to be. Maybe someone in Dell could note this problem and test in-house. And, if you want to compensate me for the 20 + hours I spent working on this problem, which has be great, too.

• 2 SSID on the same Vlan?

  Hi all -

  Newbie question. When I set up wireless, I'll be able to use 2 different SSID on the same vlan?

  Example:

  dot11 ssid example1

  VLAN 2

  authentication open eap eap_methods

  authentication network eap eap_methods

  dot11 ssid example2

  VLAN 2

  open authentication eap_methods

  authentication network eap eap_methods

  Hi James,

  I hope that the attached material will answer your question:

  Cisco Aironet 1100 series

  Using VLANs with Cisco Aironet Wireless Equipment

  Obsolete versions of software Cisco Aironet permit binding multiple SSID to a VLAN. The current versions are not.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Products/HW/Wireless/ps4570/products_configuration_example09186a00801d0815.shtml#.

  Configuration Guide for Cisco IOS software for Points of access Cisco Aironet, 12.2 (15) JA

  Multiple SSID configuration

  VLAN id - vlan

  (Optional) Assign the SSID to a VLAN in your network. Client devices that associate using the SSID are grouped in this VLAN. You can assign one SSID to a VLAN.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/wireless/ps4570/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00802085c4.html

  I hope this helps!

  Rob

  Remember messages useful rate...

• Extend the L2 VLAN multi-site WAN

  Hello

  I have several sites connected over a MPLS network provider, everything works as expected, have full connectivity L3 in all these sites.

  I now need to establish layer 2 connectivity (VLAN) on the 21 sites. Ideally, I would intend to attach additional routers behind routers of THIS (don't have no access to these suppliers or PEs, but provider may re - configure BGP on the CE peer with our device) and use a port on these routers as port Lan Layer 2, but do not know which technology to use

  1. L2TPv3 comes to mind, but can L2TPv3 works in a multipoint configuration? Can I have a site as a hub and others like rays and talk through the hub? Traditional using L2TPV3 config, how do I use multiple Xconnects for the same VLAN on the same interface?
  2. Worse, I can run on (also our new routers VPLS PEs) MPLS VPLS, but seems like overkill.

  What you guys say is the most simple/more elegant solution for this puzzle?

  L2TPv3 does not support multitouch.  It can perform point to point.

  VPLS does support multitouch, but you need much more expensive kit to do.

  I have just a brainwave!  You only use the IP protocol for this network of layer 2?  If so, use LISP.  It works on the same lower end kit of Cisco.  I would like to convert your entire network to him.

  In particular, you must activate the LISP mobility.

  General information of LISP:

  http://Lisp.Cisco.com/

  An example of an extension of the continuous complex layer 2 using LISP with full redundancy.  You don't want something this complex, but it shows what you want to do, and the massive power that LISP has.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DCI/5-0/LISPmobility/DCI_LISP_Host_Mobility/LISPmobile_4.html

• Can WOL while the port is configured to authenticate through ISE

  Hi all

  I tried setting up WOL

  The L3 switch configuration I have no problem in it

  Configuration of the L2 switch without configuration of ISE

  interface fa0/1

  switchport access vlan 100

  switchport mode access

  spanning tree portfast

  It works well, but after that I put the ISE configuration on the port, WOL is not working.

  so please help can I use ISE + WOL or there will be problems because of that.

  I read a custom ' authentication control direction in "which should enable ISE and WOL.

  then, which will affect on something.

  Thank you.

  Yes, that's correct. If you add the command "authentication control-direction in" on a switchport then he will allow the "Magic Packet" WoL should be sent to the unit of the end and wake him up.

  By default, a switchport configured to dot1x will only allow EAP traffic initially to the switchport (thereby breaking WoL) you don't need to add the command "authentication control-direction in" to allow WoL functionality to continue working while ensuring that the endpoint can still only send EAP frames to the switchport prior authentication of 802. 1 x.

• restrict the SSID / VLAN to some AP?

  Is it possible to limit the SSID / VLAN to some access points of a 4400 controller?

  If I put in place the new SSID, they are distributed from all the default ap, however I onluy want the SSID is for use in areas that correspond to the type of user.

  How do you do that?

  NM

  You can do this by using the function AP-Group.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/controller/7.0/Configuration/Guide/c70wlan.html#wp1128591

• Dynamic assignment of the NAC to the same vlan came on and off strip

  Hello

  Pls forgive my ignorance, I'm fresh in the biz of the NAC.

  I have a requirement for a client, very large high rising with numerous hospital, they want to assign MDs to the same vlan, if he or she uses the Office at out clinic, which would be OOB Layer 3, and even he or she uses the Tablet PC/PDA wireless during the round room.

  The question is whether this is something achievable. A little trick how to do it would be very useful.

  Appreciate your expertise.

  Thank you

  Saami

  By user role VLAN can be activated for OOB.

  The VIRTUAL LAN is configured on the role and setting up OOB, there is a check box that you need to activate so that the user receives the vlan configured on the role (I don't remember the exact section now..).

  With that, whenever a user who belongs to a specific role connects, he will receive the same VLAN according to what is set up on its role.

  I hope this helps.

• When to use the filter VLAN vs SVI-list of access on the switches?

  If VLAN 10 is a user of 10.10.10.0/24 subnet, VLAN and I want torestrict which servers can access these users in VLAN 10, I can configure an access list and apply the ACL of a VIRTUAL local network access plan or apply the ACL on the SVI "interface vlan 10. What is a good practice as much as when I use a VIRTUAL local network access plan and when I apply the access list directly to SVI?

  Thank you very much

  VLAN-access plans are used when you want to restrict the hosts in a vlan. If you have a server and host in vlan 10 and you want to restrict this host to access the server, you must use a virtual local network access card.

  On the IVR access lists are used when you want to restrict intervlan routing between VLANS. If you have a host in vlan 10 and a server in vlan 15, you would use a normal ACL applied to the svi vlan 10, restricting the host to access the server in vlan 15.

  HTH,

  John

  Please note the useful messages *.

• Tagged management VLAN and the virtual machines on the same VLAN

  I'm faced with a problem related to our Brocade switches newly acquired and get the private VLAN to work on trunk connections to our ESX servers.  Every time I try something different, he creates a new problem.

  In our configuration, our management of VLAN is not tag and we have a VLAN for this management network that is placed on our switches VLAN no marked native.  We also have virtual machines hosted on those same ESX servers that are on the same VLAN and everything works fine.  However, when I change the ESX management to carry a label on this VLAN and change the switchports accordingly (IE no untagged VLAN native), management work, but hosted on the ESX Server machines that are on the same VLAN can get no network connectivity.

  Is it possible to have a management network labeled and also the host of virtual machines on the same VLAN or is it totally impossible?  I'm not very familiar with networking behind ESX, so I apologize if this is a dumb question with an obvious answer.

  Thank you

  Mark J.

  Is it possible to have a management network labeled and also the host of virtual machines on the same VLAN or is it totally impossible?

  Yes, it is possible... why it doesn't work for you I don't know, but try the following:

  1. set up the Group of ports of VMS to use VLAN;

  2 configure the interface of management VMkernel port group use VLAN;

  3 configure the physical switch port to allow to this VLAN and put the default VLAN natively for these interfaces.

• Inter communication VM in two ESXi using the same VLAN ID

  Hello

  I am creating a lab in my server ESXi (192.168.1.10). The default VLAN (VMNetwork) connected to ESXi is VLAN 1. If the virtual machines with 192.168.1.xx IP. able to communicate to the external network.

  But I created a new 25 VLAN in my ESXi and added two virtual machines in that ESXi. Communication between these two VMs is perfect.

  My question is, what should I do if I need these 2 VMs to connect a computer virtual hosted in an another ESXi with 25 VLAN?

  Thank you

  Nithin

  Well lets go back to the original question:

  But I created a new 25 VLAN in my ESXi and added two virtual machines in that ESXi. Communication between these two VMs is perfect.

  My question is, what should I do if I need these 2 VMs to connect a computer virtual hosted in an another ESXi with 25 VLAN?

  If you don't want your VM in 25 a VLAN on a HOST to speak to other virtual machines in the VLAN 25 to HOST B, you will need to configure it as the attached picture:

  

  Your psyhical switch should the Tag VLAN on ports so that he knows how to route traffic.  Now I guess that your fault WHAT VLAN on all your switches is 1 as it is pretty standard.  VLAN 1 is also past reguardless so you will probably just tag with 25 ports VLAN.  Once the ports are all stamped this VLAN, they will be able to talk with success.  Now what happens, it's your 2 VMS in the vSwitch can talk because they are both on the same vSwitch with VLAN Tag on it, however, when you try to talk to another virtual machine to another host the package arrives at your psyhical pass and does not see a label on this port if it falls.  The only ports that you need to add this tag VLANS are the your NIC psyhical on the host with that vSS is connected.

  I hope that this has helped or made things clearer

• In ESX VMs can choose different network/name of the label (VLAN)

  Hi guys,.

  My test vCenter crashed and I can't get it back as there is no backup. I can only connect directly to the ESXi servers and use virtual machines from there. Now, I am facing a problem while deploying a new virtual machine and by changing its network. I have a vDistributed configured switch that has 2 groups of ports 10 VLANS and VLAN 30. When I create a new virtual machine, it only let me choose VLAN 30 and will not let me choose VLAN 10 while there are a few old VMs that are still configured for VLAN 10 and I can change their card NETWORK VLAN 30. Should what changes I make to configure the VLAN 10 on my new virtual machines?

  I have 2 ESXi servers and this is the case even on the ESXi servers.

  Please find the attachment.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Hello

  The type of binding of default ports is a static binding, which means that you can connect to a virtual machine for a link static port group only through vCenter Server.

  I guess, the port VLAN 10 group is created with a static linking.

  VMware KB: Choose a type of port binding in ESX/ESXi

  If you do not group ports with ephemeral connection, you cannot connect a new VM for VDS if your vCenter is out of service.

  With connection of ephemeral ports, you can assign a virtual machine to a group of ports on ESX/ESXi and vCenter, which gives you the flexibility to manage the connections to VM through the host when vCenter is out of service.

  In this case, you will need to temporarily create a new vSwitch directly on a host with VLAN 10 to connect the new virtual machine.

  More info about ephemeral port binding:

  VMware vSphere Distributed Switch allows the management of the ephemeral ports while vCenter is offline. Vcritical

  http://www.ecloudsol.com/blog/distributed-switch-port-binding-in-VMware-vSphere-5-0/

  Vcenter with ESXi host lost and can not turn on with vDS | Virtual Me

• Remove the ' system VLAN "Nexus 1000V port-profile

  We have a Dell M1000e blade chassis with a number of Server Blade M605 ESXi 5.0 using the Nexus 1000V for networking.  We use 10 G Ethernet fabric B and C, for a total of 4 10 cards per server.  We do not use the NIC 1 G on A fabric.  We currently use a NIC of B and C fabrics for the traffic of the virtual machine and the other card NETWORK in each fabric for traffic management/vMotion/iSCSI VM.  We currently use iSCSI EqualLogic PS6010 arrays and have two configuration of port-groups with iSCSI connections (a physical NIC vmnic3 and a vmnic5 of NIC physical).

  We have added a unified EMC VNX 5300 table at our facility and we have configured three VLANs extra on our network - two for iSCSI and other for NFS configuration.  We've added added vEthernet port-profiles for the VLAN of new three, but when we added the new vmk # ports on some of the ESXi servers, they couldn't ping anything.   We got a deal of TAC with Cisco and it was determined that only a single port group with iSCSI connections can be bound to a physical uplink both.

  We decided that we would temporarily add the VLAN again to the list of VLANS allowed on the ports of trunk of physical switch currently only used for the traffic of the VM. We need to delete the new VLAN port ethernet-profile current but facing a problem.

  The Nexus 1000V current profile port that must be changed is:

  The DenverMgmtSanUplinks type ethernet port profile

  VMware-port group

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2315

  passive auto channel-group mode

  no downtime

  System vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2315

  MGMT RISING SAN description

  enabled state

  We must remove the list ' system vlan "vlan 2313-2315 in order to remove them from the list" trunk switchport allowed vlan.

  However, when we try to do, we get an error about the port-profile is currently in use:

  vsm21a # conf t

  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

  vsm21a (config) #-port ethernet type DenverMgmtSanUplinks profile

  vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # system vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2312

  ERROR: Cannot delete system VLAN, port-profile in use by Po2 interface

  We have 6 ESXi servers connected to this Nexus 1000V.  Originally they were MEC 3-8 but apparently when we made an update of the firmware, they had re - VEM 9-14 and the old 6 VEM and associates of the Channel ports, are orphans.

  By example, if we look at the port-channel 2 more in detail, we see orphans 3 VEM-related sound and it has no ports associated with it:

  Sho vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # run int port-channel 2

  ! Command: show running-config interface port-canal2

  ! Time: Thu Apr 26 18:59:06 2013

  version 4.2 (1) SV2 (1.1)

  interface port-canal2

  inherit port-profile DenverMgmtSanUplinks

  MEC 3

  vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # sho int port-channel 2

  port-canal2 is stopped (no operational member)

  Material: Port Channel, address: 0000.0000.0000 (bia 0000.0000.0000)

  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,

  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255

  Encapsulation ARPA

  Port mode is trunk

  Auto-duplex, 10 Gb/s

  Lighthouse is off

  Input stream control is turned off, output flow control is disabled

  Switchport monitor is off

  Members in this channel: Eth3/4, Eth3/6

  Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never

  102 interface resets

  We can probably remove the port-channel 2, but assumed that the error message on the port-profile in use is cascading on the other channel ports.  We can delete the other port-channel 4,6,8,10 orphans and 12 as they are associated with the orphan VEM, but we expect wil then also get errors on the channels of port 13,15,17,19,21 and 23 who are associated with the MEC assets.

  We are looking to see if there is an easy way to fix this on the MSM, or if we need to break one of the rising physical on each server, connect to a vSS or vDS and migrate all off us so the Nexus 1000V vmkernel ports can clean number VLAN.

  You will not be able to remove the VLAN from the system until nothing by using this port-profile. We are very protective of any vlan that is designated on the system command line vlan.

  You must clean the canals of old port and the old MEC. You can safely do 'no port-channel int' and "no vem" on devices which are no longer used.

  What you can do is to create a new port to link rising profile with the settings you want. Then invert the interfaces in the new port-profile. It is generally easier to create a new one then to attempt to clean and the old port-profile with control panel vlan.

  I would like to make the following steps.

  Create a new port-profile with the settings you want to

  Put the host in if possible maintenance mode

  Pick a network of former N1Kv eth port-profile card

  Add the network adapter in the new N1Kv eth port-profile

  Pull on the second NIC on the old port-profile of eth

  Add the second network card in the new port-profile

  You will get some duplicated packages, error messages, but it should work.

  The other option is to remove the N1Kv host and add it by using the new profile port eth.

  Another option is to leave it. Unless it's really bother you no VMs will be able to use these ports-profile unless you create a port veth profile on this VLAN.

  Louis