TMS, CUCM and MCU

Similar Questions

• Question about commissioning of the E20s - CUCM and TMS

  If we now run software CUCM 8.6.2 and 4.1 E20.  I played with CUCM and TMS supply by and a few questions.

  It seems that there are some features that can be set via the TMS models that cannot be resolved via CUCM (MTU, custom, etc commands).  Is it possible to apply these settings through TMS while having the unit registered in CUCM?

  Essentially, I want my call recording platform CUCM and control, but want to keep the granularity that TMS offers in terms of commissioning etc..  I expect the same problems with C-series, etc.

  Am I right in saying that, in order to get the E20 to join CUCM, I need to define the external Manager to "CUCM", and thus eliminate any possibility of TMS to manage? Otherwise, what is I could have managed by TMS and then set the SIP of the E20 to point to CUCM via templates in TMS?

  Any tips on that?

  Hello

  Having both TMS and CUCM to manage endpoints is not a good idea (yet). TMS and CUCM will return to each of the other toes with unpredictable results.

  With TMS 13.2, I understand that you should be able to import the CUCM in TMS and then find all systems registered to it and import these into TMS, however in this case TMS plan only systems conferences and will manage them not active (you can see status of the call as well).  13.2 TMS is not yet released, so that's what I said must be in this version.

  So basically now if you use CUCM, use CUCM provisioning and don't use TMS.  We focus on interactions with systems registered with CUCM TMS and it will be more developed on this in the future.  I recommend you check out the TMS13.2 release notes released to see if it is mentioned.

  Thank you

• Import and export directory for CUCM and TMS

  How can I configure TMS and CUCM use of TMS directory for an endpoint registered to CUCM? I've added to TMS but and TMS can shoot CUCM Phonebook, but how does he see the directory for other infrastructure in TMS to fill in the directory of CUCM CUCM?

  tms_not_supported.PNG

  

  If the endpoint of telepresence is running TC7.0 or later, you can configure in CUCM using TMS as a source of spare phone book, there are also TMS 14.4.  Refer to the Administration of the TC on CUCM 10.5.1 endpoints (TC7.2) on page 24 for more information.

• TMS + CUCM telephone directories

  Hi all

  When you work with a complete CPU, composed of the following deployment:

  • CUCM (8.6/9);
  • VCS-C/E;
  • MSDS;
  • Jabber for Windows (CUCM);
  • Active component URI between CUCM and VCS.

  Ideally, in this scenario, I would that all of my Jabber for Windows clients to see all room based systems that are registered in VCS, when they try to get a system/user.

  I know that these directories are two distinct entities, does anyone know if it is possible to propergate the "all systems" TMS phonebook in CUCM somehow, or would it be a manual process?

  Thank you, if

  Hi Simon,.

  We are working on a solution like this.  If your room based systems were kinesiologist to CUCM, they show up in the directory for all your CUCM based systems.  I understand that there is a reason why you want to way keep your room systems on the RESUME for the time being.

  In the next version of TMS, we will see a new type of telephone directory of "CUCM", which are all systems configured in CUCM.  So your TMS direct managed or put into service endpoints will be able to see all systems no matter where they are registered.

  TMS systems are avaiable in directories CUCM is identified as a highly desirable item, but currently I don't have a timeline.

  Andrew - TME for TMS

• TMS select only MCU, when two MCU are available

  Hi all

  I have two microcontrollers, one for US sites and the other for sites in the United Kingdom. Both are configured in TMS will host multi point Conference. During the planning of videoconference, TMS always select the MCU UK. Even points to end at the US site. I have observed MSDS id is 5 for UK MCU and MSDS ID is 12 for us MCU.

  Let me know, what are the settings that I need to check in MCU and TMS?

  How to check on TMS and MCU intellectual property areas?

  Thanks in advance!

  Kind regards

  Siva

  Take a read through the TMS Admin doc, in particular chapter of routing:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/TMS/admin_gu...

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Communication between LabVIEW and MCU based on Modbus Protocol

  Hello

  I am a first year student in the port.and series applications see you, my projiect needs to communicate between LV and MCU based on Modbus Protocol.all configure it are correct, but the lv to send false information which is not suitable for modbus.i do not know how to fix it.

  My programs are:

  Why did you decide to write your own code instead of what is already available? If you had done a search, you would have easily found the modbus library. Just give a try.

• Configure Jabber for Mac with local CUCM and WebEx Connect

  Hi, I was wondering if someone could set up the Jabber client Mac 8.6.2 to use the server of presence of WebEx Connect with a local farm the CUCM and connection of the unit. The tab preferences accounts show or allow the addition of voice services. I added work CUCM preferences plist file local, which, according to me, are the correct entries, however I still can't see the accounts under the Preferences tab. We currently do not have a presence server local cisco where the obligation of trial WebEx Connect Server because I can't get past the first step of configuration without it.

  concerning

  Paul

  You must connect to your Webex portal and activate these settings to connect.  Once they are allowed, log out/log in Connect and you should be able to configure CUCM TFTP, etc..

• CUCM and UCCX version compatibility

  Hello

  We are re-hosting UCCX to vmware with CUCM 9.x version 8.5.1

  CUCM and UCCX both will be on VMware.

  Someone let me know what CUCM 9.x supports UCCX 8.5.1base.

  We have only UCCX 8.5.1base DVD version for installation. I'm looking for the compatible version of 9.x CUCM to install.

  Pls let me know the CUCM 9.x compatible with version 8.5.1base UCCX

  Rgds

  Rajesh Kumar

  Hi Renon,

  This info is on Page 40 of the attached guide;

  Software and hardware compatibility for Cisco Unified Contact Guide

  Center Express and Cisco Unified IP IVR

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/CRS/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.PDF

  See you soon!

  Rob

  "May your heart always be joyful".
  And your song may always be sung
  Can remain you forever young. "

  -Dylan

• Voicemail configuration base with CUCM and connections of the unit

  Hello again,

  I'm still very new to CUCM.  I am configuring a CUCMB 6.01 test deployment.  He has connections in the integrated unit.  I have 2 DNs assigned to users and Cisco IP phones.  I use MGCP (Cisco 3745 with 2FXO as gateway).  Now, I'm trying to extensions of voicemail installation for the users.  I read a lot of documentation on CUCM and unity, but I know that Unity Express is not what I need, and that you have not found information on the basics of implementing voicemail for users of CUCM.

  Users are DN 1001 and 1002 respectively.  They are part of a list of hunting (broadcast) so that the arrival of incoming calls, both phones will ring simultaneously.  Not sure if this has any bearing or not.  I would like to be able to put in place so that each DN rings on the IP phone say 6 times, then go to a Unity voicemail box configuration for that user.  I have already imported users 2 in the unit.  I ran the voice messaging port configuration wizard.  Everything looks as if it runs correctly, but I'm stuck really share say CUCM to route the call to the mailbox of the unit.  Probably the simplest part.  Ideas or help on this would be much appreciated.  Thank you in advance.

  Impetuous salvation,

  CUCM works this way

  So the fact that 1001 and 1002 receive calls via a group has a significant impact on this config.

  You must keep in mind that a call that is routed through the fighter pilot will always ignore the CFWD settings on phones of hunting member of the group. The normal way to control it then is through disconnection of the Group Hunt members phones combined with the front fighter pilot level settings.

  The following section describes how the parameters to call it forward on the phones of individual members Hunt are ignored when presented a call via the hunting feature. Here's a clip;

  Hunting and call forwarding

  The concept of hunting differs from call forwarding. Hunting allows Cisco Unified Communications Manager to extend a call to one or more lists of numbers, where each such list can specify an order of hunting which is selected from a fixed set of algorithms. When a call extends over a part of hunting of these lists and the party does not answer or is busy, hunting resumes from the next part of hunting. (The next party of hunting varies according to the current hunting algorithm). Hunting has so ignore settings call forward No Answer (CFNA), call forward busy (CFB) or call before all (CFA) for the party to attempt (group member line phones).

  Cisco Unified Communications Manager offers the possibility to redirect a call when hunting fails (that is, when the hunt ends without a part of hunting to the respondent, due either to exhaust the list of numbers of hunting is to expire). If used, this final redirection includes an automatic call forwarding action. Therefore, the fighter pilot Configuration window includes call forwarding configuration concepts which are similar to those found on the directory number Configuration window.

  Example of a call hunt

  Although hunting is different from the transfer, Hunt often develops as a call that gets forwarded to a certain number of fighter-pilot. The protective cover of appeal extends from hunting to allow the final drive after two exhausts of hunting or expires.

  A typical call calling hunting can include the following phases:

  The appeal of hunting through groupings of posts set up according to the algorithms implemented for each group. Hunting is successful (if it meets a hunting party), exhausts (if all parts of hunting are tempted, but no response), or expires (if the deadline set by the Maximum hunting timer runs out before that all parties are tempted, and none of the parties who have tried to answer).

  For the purpose of this example, we assume that hunting does not succeed.

  If a form any of the final drive is configured, the call forward for a next destination; otherwise, the call is released.

  Maximum hunting timer

  The Maximum Hunt Timer field on fighter pilot Configuration window allows the administrator to enter a value (in seconds) to limit the hunting through a list of hunting season. After gaps in the time specified, if hunting was not successful, the call is transferred to a voicemail system, a specific compound number, or some personal treatment (if configured) or the call is released.

  The good doc.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/voice_ip_comm/CUCM/Admin/6_0_1/ccmsys/a03rp.html#wp1078922

  If the call goes unanswered or all Member phones are disconnected, then an attacker needs to be applied at the level of the "fighter pilot".

  Hunt the settings forward

  Before hunting without an answer - when did not answered the call which is distributed through the list of hunting at a specific time, this field specifies how to transfer the call.

  Destination this parameter contains the number of the directory to which calls are forwarded.

  Before busy hunt - when the call which is distributed through the list of hunting is busy at a precise moment, this field specifies how to transfer the call.

  Destination this parameter contains the number of the directory to which calls are forwarded.

  Maximum Timer Hunt - enter a value (in seconds) that specifies the maximum duration for hunting. (Used in conjunction with Forward busy hunting)

  In your case, it is best to configure the DN of a fighter pilot in the extension of alternatives under the 1001 and 1002

  mailbox.

  I hope this helps!

  Rob

• Cisco VCS and MCU - Conference does not

  Dear community members

  I have problems in the VCS configuration to work with the MCU to join to several endpoints in a conference. The components that I use:

  -Cisco VCS control v8.7.

  -Cisco 5300 MCU 5310 v 4.5 (1.72)

  -3 x SX20 end points

  I recorded every endpoint and MCU on VCS, but I'm not able to do a conference call 3-way, the only option is 1 video and 1 audio (I disabled the Multisite option). It seems that VCS does not yet call the MCU in the game.

  Kindly help us with it.

  Can you tell us how you set up the Conference and how you have configured MCU and endpoints?

  From the sounds of it, you call each end point of one of the SX20s, but you must call simply directly in the Conference on the MCU.  If you want to have a conference point to point between two end points and then degenerate into a multipoint conference on the MCU, you must configure Multiway.

  With the help of Multiway with Cisco TelePresence systems

• SIP URI B2B calls via CUCM and Highway

  Hi all

  Cannot find out how to configure the SIP URI from SX codecs, recorded calls on CUCM.

  I CUCM and IM & P 10.5.1 a pair of X8.5.2 expressway with two areas of course - for B2B calls, and the external jabber.

  I want to make calls of SX-codecs outside via SIP, by using the URI field, for example, [email protected] / * / or [email protected] / * /. How can I configure that?

  I already have the routing model, which is the SIP Trunk for Exp - C, for H323 calls by ip address. Is it possible to make a routing model to call the SIP URI?

  You can see my deployment in this image.

  fghj.PNG

  

  Best wishes

  Igor

  Hi Igor

  These guides will help you resolve your issues:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/Expressway/config_guide/x8-5/Cisco-Expressway-SIP-trunk-to-unified-cm-deployment-guide-CUCM-8-9-10-and-x8-5.PDF

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/ru/video/12362936

  BR Oleksandr

• 9.1 CUCM and 8.5 CUPS compatible?

  Hello

  made the CUPS 8.5 is compatible with the CUCM9.x?

  We plan to upgrade a CUCM8.6 to 9.1. But do not want to upgrade the CUPS8.5.

  the CUP8.5 will work with CUCM 9.x?

  I have not seen any document on the compatibility matrix, that's why I sent this message here.

  Kind regards

  Antra

  No, the major and minor version must match, you MUST upgrade to IM & P 9.1.

  From 9.x, CUCM and IM & P versions must be aligned to the x.y level.

• can't make an external call with CuCM and H323 gateway

  Hi experts, I have a problem with CuCM and h323 Gateway. I use a 2811 router to make a gateway H323, CuCM server and Switch layer 2 build a VoIP LAB, this my network:

  

  and my router configuration:

  Current configuration: 2335 bytes

  !

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  router host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  forest-meter operation of syslog messages

  !

  No aaa new-model

  !

  !

  !

  dot11 syslog

  IP source-route

  !

  !

  IP cef

  DHCP excluded-address 192.168.1.1 IP 192.168.1.10

  !

  IP VOICE dhcp pool

  network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  option 150 ip 192.168.1.2

  default router 192.168.1.1

  !

  !

  No ipv6 cef

  !

  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

  !

  !

  voip phone service

  h323 connections allow h323

  allow connections h323 to SIP

  allow connections sip h323

  allow sip to sip connections

  service additional h450.12

  Fax protocol cisco

  !

  !

  !

  vocal h323 class 1

  H225 timeout tcp establish 3

  !

  !

  !

  translation of the voice-rule 1

  rule 1 / ^ 9.

  !

  !

  voice translation-profile PSTN

  translate 1 called

  !

  !

  voice-card 0

  !

  !

  application

  Service flash aa1: its - cisco.2.0.2.0.tcl

  paramspace English language en

  paramspace English index 1

  Param aa-driver 0839959204

  paramspace location English flash:

  prefix English paramspace

  !

  !

  !

  Archives

  The config log

  hidekeys

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  H323-gateway voip interface

  port of link voip H323-gateway 192.168.1.1

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  no ip address

  Shutdown

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  !

  voice-port 0/0/0

  cover of the echo - cancel 32

  connection ERA opx 3100

  Description 08395959204

  activation of the caller ID

  !

  voice-port 1/0/0

  !

  voice-port 0/0/2

  !

  voice-port 0/0/3

  !

  !

  !

  1010 Dial-peer voice pots

  Service aa1

  incoming called number 08395959204

  direct line to inside

  port 0/0/0

  !

  voice pots Dial-peer 2020

  PSTN description

  translation-profile outgoing PSTN

  destination-model 9 t

  Setup progress_ind allow 3

  progress_ind enable progress 8

  port 0/0/0

  Forward-digits all the

  !

  Dial-peer voice 10 voip

  destination-model 1...

  Setup progress_ind allow 3

  progress_ind enable progress 8

  h323 voice-class 1

  session target ipv4:192.168.1.2

  DTMF-relay h245 alphanumeric

  Codec g711ulaw

  No vad

  !

  !

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  Cisco password

  opening of session

  !

  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

  end

  I have configured the gateway h323 and attach files to router parttern on follow CUCM

  What is the problem and how to solve?

  Thanks for all the help.

  Your DP pointing CUCM is wrong, or your ÉRA OPX, depending on what you need.

  voice-port 0/0/0

  cover of the echo - cancel 32

  connection ERA opx 3100

  Description 08395959204

  activation of the caller ID

  Dial-peer voice 10 voip

  destination-model 1...

  Setup progress_ind allow 3

  progress_ind enable progress 8

  h323 voice-class 1

  session target ipv4:192.168.1.2

  DTMF-relay h245 alphanumeric

  Codec g711ulaw

  No vad

  Your DP is waiting for 1... and you send 3100, they must match.

  You might need to change the significantt numbers and entering CSS, but only you can know

  For outgoing, you are throwing 9 predot, but again, expect it in your RFP, again, change as you need.

  voice pots Dial-peer 2020

  PSTN description

  translation-profile outgoing PSTN

  destination-model 9 t

  Setup progress_ind allow 3

  progress_ind enable progress 8

  port 0/0/0

  Forward-digits all the

  You cannot transfer the numbers all send you also 9 for each call

  Change your configuration you want / need.

  HTH

  Java

  If it helps, please note

  www.Cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

• TMS, VCS and Jabbber "impossible to connect to the TMS on the VCS agent".

  Dear,

  We have Cisco TMS, VCSC and jabber deployment, we did before commissioning the VCSC and TMS and jabber worked well, but after the upgrade the VCSC v7.2 to jabber version 8.2 has stopped working and I can not connect more and when I go to the TMS and connect to the VCS I get "unable to connect to the TMS on the VCS agent" Please notify

  What TMS version do you use?  And you are using Extension of provisioning of the TMS (TMSPE)?

  Looks like you are using TMS Agent Legacy, which has been supported in VCS X7.2 and has since been removed from X8.1.  You will need to migrate to TMSPE and very probably upgrade your server TMS as well if you do not meet the minimum version.

  Cisco TMSPE 1.0 Deployment Guide

  Here's the guide deployment for TMSPE 1.0, there are newer versions, but 1.0 is one that you want to migrate from legacy Agent TMS.  Once installed and migrate your data, you can then go to the most recent version, which is 1.4 (see below).

  Cisco TMSPE with VCS 1.4 Deployment Guide

• Comments of Jabber with VCS registered endpoint control and MCU

  Hi all

  According to my plans. I'll try to integrate comments Jabber with environment of Collaboration.

  Use cases;

  1. call between Jabber and VCS registered control EX90 comments

  2. Add Jabber comments a MCU conference where MCU part control VCS

  3. call between Jabber and Jabber comments

  Comments will be welcome :)

  Best regards

  Mesut

  Hi Martin,

  From Jabber comments 10.0, only #3 above is supported. However, we will publish JG 10.5 soon (I hope that in the next few months), and it will support all 3 of your above use cases. The only downside is to use #1 and #2 cases, you have a CUCM in the call flow.