TMS-> Scheduler conductor calls

Similar Questions

• Integration of TMS/TMSXE/conductor and Exchange

  Just installed new TMS/TMSXE/conductor for a customer and the initial test was OK but have a question.

  When TMSXE sends the notification to inviting him with the information that the meeting has been scheduled and information to others to call for the meeting, is there a way for TMSXE to also send information to people who have been invited as well?

  The client thinks it would be a pain to make the cut and past in humans invite you again

  If there is somewhere in the documentation that I missed, plase let me know.

  Thank you.

  TMS will not send e-mail confirmation of booking to anyone else that the person who at the request of the Conference.  By the TMSXE user's Guide, the Scheduler will send the e-mail confirmation for guests, or paste its content in the original meeting invitation.

• Question TMS and conductor - conferences to improve safety by using conference

  Hi people,

  Currently, I implement some projects involving Cisco Telepresence conductor and I was wondering the benefits that conductor brings to the video network, it's really a great solution!

  Discover the benefits of the conductor, I created the following deployment:

  

  It works very well! The customer is very satisfied with the level of security when using this deployment. Their multi-point conferences is safer now.

  Well, when I created this topology I considered not how the environment would work when planning conferences, with TMS and conductor because this client has yet to TMS. Then, I was just shocked when I opened the TMS deployment guide e conductor and find the following statement:

  Note: The exposed conductor TelePresence conference type is not supported in Cisco TMS. Only models conference using the conference meeting type are supported.

  Page 13 - http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/tms/config_guide/TelePresence_Conductor_with_Cisco_TMS_Deployment_Guide_XC1-2_TMS14-1.pdf

  I almost jumped the bridge... Now, I know that my great topology no longer works with TMS.

  Well, here are my questions:

  Why do we have this limit?

  That Cisco plans to fix this?

  The guide is related to the conductor XC1-2 and 14-1 TMS, something has changed in TMS 14.2.2 and XC2.1?

  I'd appreciate any help really, really!

  Thanks in advance.

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.

  Paulo Souza wrote:
  [...] I am wondered the benefits that Conductor brings to the video network, it is really a great solution!

  Agreed! The driver of the telepresence really is a great product.

  Why do we have this limitation?

  Because the feature was never implemented on the side TMS. It was decided that the other characteristics are more important and should be a priority. There is nothing on the type of conference 'Read' which is inherently incompatible with the TMS, but work needs to be done first.

  Examples:

  • The control of conference centre: you will probably see the entries in double Conference if you are using a 'read' conference
  • TMS does not differentiate between the presidents and guests during the creation of scheduled conferences 'Conference' on the conductor.

  None of them are very difficult to solve from a development point of view, but they are not trivial to apply or test either.

  Does Cisco have plans to fix that?
  

  Nothing specific is planned, don't. As always: if it is a problem to your customer, make a request to feature through your account manager or another Cisco point of contact.

  The guide is related to Conductor XC1-2 and TMS 14-1, has any thing been changed  in TMS 14.2.2 and XC2.1?
  

  Conductor XC 2.1 and TMS 14.2.2 is a combination not supported, but nothing has been changed to

  2.2 XC and 14.3 TMS: types of conference 'Read' are not yet supported.

  Best regards

  Kjetil

• Leap year TMS Scheduler

  We have MSD and MSD Smart Scheduler.  When users of planning meetings in the smart Scheduler for Monday 2/29, they are listed as Tuesday 3/1, I guess because of the leap year.  However, it shows the correct date when you click the meeting and in the TMS itself.  I checked to make sure that the time zone settings are correct.  Is that going to the issue of Monday?

  Turns out just a cosmetic defect with Smart Scheduler, see CSCuy19844.

• Time format hurt TMS Scheduler

  Much of community support.

  As you can see on the screenshot that the problem with the German version of the Planner, is that the time is not indicated, after 12:45 it shows 01:00 instead of 13:00, you are aware of this problem?

  Kind regards

  Christian

  Hi this case has been resolved

  It's in the registry server TMS under HKEY_USER\. Default\Control Panel\International

  

  These two fields missing AM and PM when re-filled the AM PM problem disappeared.

  

  This area has changed in hh: mm which has initiated the German time to show in 24-hour format.

  Then, the problem has been resolved.

  / Magnus

• TMS scheduling for a limited time.

  Hello all, I already know it there are no solution, but is not to ask

  My client has a solution with integration of TMS with excenge, he asks me if it is possible to limit the maximum time for planning a meeting.

  Thanks in advance.

  Greetings

  Sandra

  Hello

  You can check this on the side of the Exchange. If you want the maximum duration is for example three-hour meeting, you can set the value of maximum (minutes) on the Exchange resource to 180.

  For more information:

  • http://www.MSExchange.org/articles-tutorials/Exchange-Server-2010/management-administration/resource-mailboxes-Exchange-2010-part3.html

  Kind regards

  Kjetil

• TMS Smart Scheduler - what can you schedule and dial a number?

  Hi Forum,

  I think TMS 13.2.1 at 14.3 TMS with TMSPE 1.1 reclassification.  However, I saw that the 'old' web scheduler has been replaced by the new smart sceduler.

  You can plan the new smart Scheduler? It seems that you can only program calls to numbers in directories?  You can schedule dial calls to:

  Directory movi/Jabber?

  External SIP/h.323

  External ISDN?

  What can't the new smart Scheduler compared to the 'old web Scheduler '?

  Thank you

  Robert

  Robert H.

  Yes, at this time, you can add managed by TMS systems (those that are added to the system > Navigator) when planning through Smart Scheduler.

  Cisco has already opened a feature request for the opportunity to add directories or call the participants in the smart Scheduler interface, but I cannot confirm if Cisco really wants to develop or when it will be available. It's the already opened by Adam feature request:

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCug76084

  A solution would be to add your external endpoint as a 'room' to TMS under system > Navigator, so that they will appear on Smart Scheduler, however, systems added as piece takes a license system just like a common system managed by TMS. So, before you follow this workaround solution, make sure that you have licenses enough for that.

  Can my personal thing, if you really need schedule the call out participating, so I suggest you use common reservation interface, at least up to the Cisco enhance Smart Scheduler.

  In addition, to raise this feature request you, your local Cisco representative so that they can help you to climb this feature in Cisco request to try and get priority on this point, it is useful. More customers are asking for the same thing, more Cisco considers that the feature request.

  Concerning

  Paulo Souza

  My answer was helpful? Please note the useful answers and do not forget to mark questions resolved as "responded."

• TMS can generate voice alerts when a scheduled conference ends?

  The Cisco / Codian MCU will provide prompts to the end of the Conference at specific times before the conference end time.

  Unfortunately TMS appears not to propose on the warnings of the screen at the end of the Conference and to schedule the call MCU intentionally to make sure that the MCU cannot generate the voice warnings (conference on the MCU is longer than the time TMS on demand - TMS tears down the Conference at the correct end time).

  Is it possible to configure TMS to generate both the screen and sound alerts - or to generate "real" length, allowing conferences Codian warning messages to be heard?

  Thank you

  No, not for the moment. This should be a feature request.

• TMS with a cluster of conductor?

  Hi, would appreciate any guidance.

  I built a group of conductor that I added to TMS for the purpose of planning appeals.

  I'm afraid that TMS does not seem very "cluster aware". All 3 devices (2 drivers + driver managed MCU) appear in the tab MCU, which does ' t seems correct.

  How a failure of conductor is managed by TMS? It is based on the standard MCU failover?

  How managed MCU port count works in a cluster?

  Thank you!

  Clusters of TMS and conductor is not currently supported.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• TMS IS involved in a VCS database call

  Hi guys,.

  I am just geeting my head around such empty things, so please easy tale about me

  I was watching a call log FRO a call between a VC VC. And I saw these lines below. Can someone please clarify how the TMS is involved in the call flow. I can see the VCS C requesting a license manager and by sending a POST request to the TMS... Are TMS of the License Manager? or VCS are just inform the TMS of the call?

  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 228" Module ="network.http" Level = "DEBUG": Message = 'Request' method = 'POST' URL ='http://127.0.0.1:9999/licensemanager/acquire"Ref ="0x5369d10 ".
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 229" Module ="network.http" Level = "DEBUG": Message = "Request" method = "POST", URL ="http://127.0.0.1:4370 / status/call/call/uuid/fb147b6a-8874-11e3-8ddf-0010f31e26cc" Ref = "0x53c3c70".
  "2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime ="2014-01-28 23:36:16, 231"Module =" network.http"Level ="DEBUG": Message = 'Response' Src - ip ="127.0.0.1"Src-port ="4370"Dst - ip ="127.0.0.1"Dst-port = '40056' response =" 200 OK "ResponseTime ="0.001804"Ref ="0x53c3c70 ".
  "2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN elements UTCTime ="2014-01-28 23:36:16, 234"Module =" developer.licensemanager.service.manager"Level ="INFO"CodeLocation =" licensemanager (132) ' detailed = "License" call_id = "fb147aca-8874-11e3-8b16-0010f31e26cc" lic_type = "nontraversal".
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN licensemanager: Level = 'INFO' detailed = "License" call_id = "fb147aca-8874-11e3-8b16-0010f31e26cc" lic_type = "nontraversal" elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 234"
  "2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime ="2014-01-28 23:36:16, 235"Module =" network.http"Level ="DEBUG": Message = 'Response' Src - ip ="127.0.0.1"Src-port ="9999"Dst - ip ="127.0.0.1"Dst-port = '40133' response =" 200 OK "ResponseTime ="0.006763"Ref ="0x5369d10 ".
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 237" Module ="network.dns" Level = "DEBUG": detail = "Query DNS sending" name = 'AFREN-SOL - STM01.afren .net .net' Type = ' has or AAAA ""
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 237" Module ="network.tcp" Level = "DEBUG": ip - Src = "192.168.0.171" Src-port = "17642" Dst - ip = "192.168.68.142" = "1720" detail = "TCP connection" Dst-port "
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 238" Module ="network.http" Level = "DEBUG": Message = "Request" method = "POST", URL ="http://127.0.0.1:4370 / status/call/call/uuid/fb147b6a-8874-11e3-8ddf-0010f31e26cc" Ref = "0x53c3c70".
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 238" Module ="network.dns" Level = "DEBUG": detail = "resolved host name to: ['IPv4"TCP"192.168.0.175'] (A/YYYY) number of records retrieved: 1"
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 238" Module ="network.tcp" Level = "DEBUG": Dst - ip = "192.168.0.175" Dst-port = '80' retail = "TCP connection" "
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 238" Module ="network.tcp" Level = "DEBUG": ip - Src = "192.168.0.171" Src-port = "40343" Dst - ip = "192.168.0.175" Dst-port '80' retail = "TCP connection" = "
  "2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime ="2014-01-28 23:36:16, 241"Module =" network.http"Level ="DEBUG": Message = 'Response' Src - ip ="127.0.0.1"Src-port ="4370"Dst - ip ="127.0.0.1"Dst-port = '40056' response =" 200 OK "ResponseTime ="0.003146"Ref ="0x53c3c70 ".
  2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime = "2014-01-28 23:36:16, 245" Module ="network.tcp" Level = "DEBUG": ip - Src = "192.168.0.171" Src-port = "17642" Dst - ip = "192.168.68.142" = "1720" detail = "TCP connection" Dst-port "
  "2014 01-28 T 23: 36:16 + 00:00 SCR01-GROUND-AFREN tvcs: elements UTCTime =" 2014-01-28 23:36:16, 245"Module =" network.h323 "Level ="INFO": Dst - ip ="192.168.68.142"Dst-port ="1720 ".

  Please note all useful posts

  "The essence of Christianity is not the induction, but the Self-effacement - William Barclay"

  Hello

  In this case, the License Manager's internal VCS code - take care of the course and non-traversal call licenses etc.

  Every Post in your logs requests will the VCS loopback address - 127.0.0.1 - VCS talking to himself.

  Thank you

  Guy

• A MultiSITE call may be promoted to a MultiWAY call?

  I have a customer who currently has a number of endpoints with multi-site licenses, mainly 6000MXP units.  The client is developed to the point where 6-pin calls are no longer adequate, and they'll have to buy an MCU.

  My question is:

  Can the customer still enjoy the microcontrollers built in codecs 6000MXP and use a MultiSITE call until the participants are too many and then degenerate into a MultiWAY call?

  Will there be a way to migrate the customer to a MCU usage, perhaps by the personal use of alias of bridge?

  Hi Anthony!

  Can the client still take advantage of the built-in MCUs in the 6000MXP codecs, and use a MultiSITE call until such time as the participants are too many, and then escalate to a MultiWAY call?
  

  No, it is not possible to climb a call running Multisite for a call Multiway or MCU (MXP or C series).

  On the endpoints that will be able to launch the Multiway call is an exclusive setting, therefore,

  Select Multisite, Multiway (or completely disable a Multipoint).

  In addition Multiway must be supported by the endpoint, newest Cisco/Tandberg endpoints points support

  initiate a call Multiway and many (incl. 3rd party) support to be reunited to form a Multiway call.

  It is also dependent on the version of the software.

  In short, with Multiway may as end points that do not support being redirected

  for the MCU (for example the outer parts where you don't have conrtol from software versions,...)

  do not be reunited to form the Conference.

  Is there a better way to migrate the client to the use of an MCU, perhaps through the use of personal bridge aliases?
  

  
  Is there a better way to migrate the client to the use of an MCU, perhaps through the use of personal bridge aliases?
  

  To swap the MXP multisite with a microcontroller of HD Cisco (old Codian) is a great idea in any case, it will not focus only

  the capacity of the largest conferences but also improves quality. Each participant will receive its own optimized

  video stream instead of the single video stream where the worst participant defines what you will get.

  As you said, after meeting personal room numbers (with findme or certain rules of vcs, you can also do named uris,

  as [email protected] / * /), generic virtual meeting rooms or to book through TMS/Scheduler

  may be the solution.

• Remove the video of TCS in the layout when flow on demand through TMS ' record'

  System information:

  TMS v13.2.2

  TCS v5.2 (configured as a terminal)

  4510 Codian MCU v4.4

  The TCS and the MCU are registered at TMS.  I work on the management of all our calls more centrally by TMS and struggled to integrate the CHT in conferences.  I don't want the black screen of the "registration...". "appears as a participant at the disposal of the participants.  I know these can be configured manually to rule out it, but I want to automate it as much as possible.

  On the MCU, aliases are configured to not send the video to the MCU by default; It silently records in the background.  All conferences configured directly on the MCU without the "help" of TMS call out to all the endpoints - including the alias TCS - and only the video settings are visible.  The content is saved properly.

  When conferences are planned through TMS, however, the TCS alias is composed in just like before, but it also sends a video feed to the MCU - a black screen with "Recording" on this subject.  I tried to call from the system directory and what makes an "external" call, but both give me the same result.  I guess that's because the MCU and TMS do not share the same phone book.  What is the reason?  When this happens, the MCU is not the ability to cut the flow of the CS during the video content.

  Currently, my plan is to have every endpoint called via TMS scheduling and then have my technicians dial to the CS manually after that trial is over.  Automation is my aim, however

  Any help would be great.

  Hello Luke.

  You can very easily cut the video and/or audio from the TCS in your conference.  When you create the reservation in MSD and have your MCU added, go into 'Connection settings' and it should be two boxes on the right-hand side where you can trim the video/audio.

  Try it and let us know.

• Problems with allocation of bandwidth TMS on server TP

  I have questions, get MSDS to schedule a call 6 Mbps to a telepresence server.

  When I create a reservation on the server TP using TMS, I can choose any bandwidth (2560 Kbps, 4096 Kbps, 6144 Kbps etc.).  Regardless of bandwidth, I put the Conference, which is the rate of calls that TP server connects with, EXCEPT 6144 Kbps.  Whenever I put it to 6144 Kbps, the rate of appeal dates back to 1920 Kbps.

  If I dial a number from the server TP itself, everything connects to 6 Mbps OK (even with dial back in).

  Looking at the history of calls on the CV, the server TP requests only 1920 Kbps when off numbering of a TMS to the meeting request is set to 6144 Kbps.

  All bandwidth restrictions have been removed from the VCS, the end points of support 6 Mbps (as evidenced by the Ad - Hoc numbering work OK in each direction).  It seems that the TMS set the bandwidth of conference of 1920 Kbps (or, failing to set a bandwidth of conference at all) despite set to 6144 Kbps.

  VCS: 7.2

  TP server: 3.0 (2.24)

  TMS: 13.2

  Any help appreciated

  Hello

  It is CSCud72945, fixed the TMS 14.2.

  Kind regards

  Kjetil

• Cannot add the conductor on the model of CMR TMSPE

  We strive to set up video-conference planning. Conductor and vTS are already integrated. Conductor is also integrated through the trunk SIP CUCM, for both ad hoc and permanent meeting. We were able to add the conductor on TMS as a device and TMSPE CMR model. But when we turn on HTTPS and signed a driver's certificate, unable to connect the driver TMSPE. We tried to create, sign and load the certificate for TMS, but still not able to connect. I hope you can help us. TMS is running on license eval. Conductor is essential and STM have 5 licenses of the screen. I've seen some answers on a few forums about Java version used with TMSPE.

  15.2.1 TMS

  TMSPE 1.7

  Update Java 8 102

  Conductor XC 4.2

  4.3.1.14 vTS

  Have you enabled 4096-bit encryption on the server where it is installed TMSPE by doing the required Java software changes indicated in the Notes of version 1.7 TMSPE? If you do not, TMSPE will not be able to communicate to the driver.

  You mention that you are trying to set up a schedule with TMS and conductor, generated TMSPE CMRS are not able to be used for planning. To set up planning, you need to configure Conference models/alias etc. on driver as well as in TMS, refer to the 'Conference on-demand management' section of the CMR premises Deployment Guide Release 7.0 - primary (for Unified CM) on pg 41.

• Task Scheduler: several "Image is corrupt or has been tampered with." Guests after downgrading from win 10

  Hey all,.

  After trying 10 Windows for a bit, I decided to downgrade (via "Go back to Windows 7" in the control panel-> update of the security & -> Recovery Windows 10). Downgrade succeeded had no problem (at least at first glance), but for a number of tasks in the Task Scheduler, I am presented with the following message:

  "Image is corrupt or has been tampered with."

  I know that many of these tasks are not associated with Microsoft and others, but there is a lot I don't recognize yet. Having research this problem the only resolution is to either restore a previous backup or remove corrupt task (and restore if possible), however they contain is the problem, I'm not sure who I should restore (if any) and the restoration, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Listed here are all tasks afflicted (half I recognize as Microsoft non - joint moulding at the top):

  ------------------------------------

  Uninstaller_SkipUAC
  Uninstaller_SkipUAC_Adam
  SmartDefrag3_UPdate
  Razer_Game_Booster_AutoUpdate
  Autoupdate1428970808
  ISM-UpdateService-4e00205a-2ab1-4423-8f77-cc25b82cde1d-Logon
  ISM-UpdateService-4e00205a-2ab1-4423-8f77-cc25b82cde1d
  GoogleUpdateTaskUserS-1-5-21-3733489001-1365333202-4051452697-1000UA1cfe8d182f5048
  GoogleUpdateTaskUserS-1-5-21-3733489001-1365333202-4051452697-1000UA
  GoogleUpdateTaskUserS-1-5-21-3733489001-1365333202-4051452697-1000Core1cfea8d16814bdc
  GoogleUpdateTaskUserS-1-5-21-3733489001-1365333202-4051452697-1000Core
  GoogleUpdateTaskMachineUA1cfeba514c17243
  GoogleUpdateTaskMachineUA
  GoogleUpdateTaskMachineCore1cfeba513c0c761
  GoogleUpdateTaskMachineCore
  Update driver Booster
  Reader BoosterSkipUAC (Adam)
  CCleanerSkipUAC
  Update BitDefender product Data_A17FD818A96743FAB28AC221BEB4B2C8
  AdvancedDriverUpdater_UPDATES
  Adobe Flash Player PPAPI notify

  UpdateRecordPath
  StartRecording
  SqlLiteRecoveryTask
  ReindexSearchRoot
  RegistrySearch
  RecordingRestart
  PvrScheduleTask
  PvrRecoveryTask
  PBDADiscoveryW2
  PBDADiscoveryW1
  PBDADiscovery
  OCURDiscovery
  OCURActivate
  ObjectStoreRecoveryTask
  MediaCenterRecoveryTask
  mcupdate_scheduled
  mcupdate
  InstallPlayReady
  ehDRMInit
  DispatchRecoveryTasks
  ConfigureInternetTimeService
  ActivateWindowsSearch
  HotStart
  BackgroundConfigSurveyor
  RacTask
  WindowsParentalControls
  SystemDataProviders
  SessionAgent
  GadgetManager
  AutoWake
  IpAddressConflict2
  IpAddressConflict1

  ------------------------------------

  Task of Bitdefender (Bitdefender product Data_A17FD818A96743FAB28AC221BEB4B2C8 update) I don't know what to do as I had reinstall Bitdefender in Windows 10 but was not necessary after downgrading - problematic because of the recovery should only have Windows and not restored Bitdefender done this task still pertain also to currently installed product?

  Thanks in advance

  I just came across another post on Microsoft Technet: Task Scheduler is broken after the downgrade from windows 10.
  Dave Green - MSFT wrote a program to discover and fix problems with Windows scheduled tasks. You can find it, as well as sources and an explanation of what he done, here: https://repairtasks.codeplex.com/

  There is also a difficulty my Task Scheduler here called

  I have not tried one of these