TMS with a cluster of conductor?

Similar Questions

• Resilliency planning TMS with driver

  Hi all

  We plan to put our cluster 8710 2 blades behind the conductor, now programmed with WebEx conferences are supported. We also add an additional 8710.

  Here is what I intended with respect to the design of driver:

  Service preference

  Hen Bridge 1-8710 cluster

  Marked for planning

  Used for the CMR / appointment conferences only failing 8710 in pool 2

  Blade 2-8710 pool deck

  Unmarked for planning

  Used for only scheduled conferences if 8710 cluster in pool 1 fails

  If an existing scheduled conference is set to start at, say 10:00 and 09:00 8710 at the Bridge Pool 1 cluster fails, conductor forward this conference automatically to the Bridge Pool 2?

  We all want CMR / appointment conferences to automatically use the default Bridge Pool 2 and don't use Bridge Pool 1 if the 8710 in Bridge Pool 2 fails.

  The above version works for my scenario?

  What you have above, is correct for the planning, see example 2 of the planning section of the examples of the conductor with the TMS Deployment Guide.  However, in the case of a failover bridge, TMS does not guarantee that there are enough resources as the secondary bridge is shared with the announcement of conferences ad hoc it is not enabled for the planning, so TMS will monitor not his ability to do that there are enough resources for scheduled conferences.

  Regarding your failover scenario, if a bridge fails, conductor detects this and start to use either the next bridge in the pool or service preferences.  I'm not sure of the time, but it will happen in a minute or two.

  However, you will need an additional service for RMC preference / conferences appointment containing the pools two bridge in order reverse just like what you listed, but in this case, none of the bridges will be marked for planning.

• Question to the Cluster of conductor

  Hi all

  Just need some ideas:

  We have a Cluster of conductor, some behind MCU and TMS. Booking is running on MSDS / conductor. All have SW-latest Versions.
  TMS can handle only a single conductor of the Cluster. Okay, all right.
  But what happened if this driver is down with scheduled conferences? Is it possible to send the reservation as soon as possible to the cluster of conductor a store there? Solutions or workarounds?

  Thank you very much!

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Hi Dirk,

  Welcome to Cisco Support Community!

  As you said correctly, when you have a cluster of conductor, TMS is not able to recognize all members of the cluster, as well as a conductor (usually the main one) will be managed and demand by TMS. If the driver fails, when a scheduled conference reached the moment to start, TMS will be able to push the Conference to the driver, so that the conference will fail.

  Unfortunately, right now, you don't have any what automatic method to push the Conference to an another counterpart of conductor in the cluster, however, as a workaround, you can manually push the Conference to another position of conductor in this method:

  • Raise your driver cluster normally according to the Cisco documentation
  • Add only the counterpart of principal conductor to TMS
  • Configure TMS to follow the system using the IP address instead of the MAC address. You can find this configuration in "system > Navigator ', tab 'connection '.
  • Configure your TMS or any server monitoring for you advice (by e-mail or by using any other method) when the conductor comes down
  • When you are told that the conductor is down, go to TMS in ' system > Navigator ', select the conductor, go to the "Connection" tab and change the IP address of you're the conductor, put the IP of another position of conductor in the cluster. So TMS will push the forthcoming conferences of the annex to this peer of conductor
  • When the principal driver is back, go to TMS and set the IP address of the back of a main conductor. So the next regular conferences will be pushed to the main driver.

  It is important to point out that, obviously, if one starts regular Conference right in time when the driver is down, before you change the IP in TMS, then this conference will fail. You will probably have to reschedule the Conference manually.

  Although this good method works very well for our customer, it is important to inform you that it is not an official Cisco solution (as I know). So I personally suggest you to test and certify yourself before appling to your environment. Personally, I don't like to suggest informal recommendations of Cisco, but I think it's something interesting to consider.

  Sorry for the delay in answering your question.  =)

  I hope this helps.

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the useful answers and do not forget to mark questions resolved as "responded."

• Unable to draw the table 1 d with a cluster of 2 items on a XY Chart

  I am unable to draw a table 1 d with a cluster of 2 items on a XY Chart. The data displayed at the entrance in the graph, but nothing is drawn. I'm trying to draw a line connecting each point generated.

  You need a registry change on the inside of loops as well.

  But beyond that, you create too complicated a structure.  You create several plots of 1 point and not a single multipoint parcel.

  See attachment for the change that works.

• Exception of HTTP after migrating TMS with TMSPE

  Migrated 13.2 TMS with TMSPE physical server in VM 2008R2, which went well, however, VCS - C is now sent me some exception HTTP State for all services supply; users, directories, and devices.

  Status: failed

  Answer: HTTP Exception

  Reason: HTTP error (400): WWW-Authenticate

  And yet, diagnostics in TMS TMSPE shows no alarm; It's all green.

  However, TAC is working on it.

  Someone at - he seen this before?

  /Jens

  Thanks for the clarification, Jens and I'm talking internally for all involved here because it seems we have "several hands in the kitchen" (as well as the different cuisines) concernng this one... which means that we will use the official channels for troubleshooting it and we'll just update this thread with leading... agreed?

• New Migration TMS with an old backup of the old server for TMS

  Hi all

  Since the Migration of data to the new server of TMS with the old backup of TMS old we have problems to access the MSDS server over https.

  Could be the reason of this problem, the old database movement?

  I checked all the Services of the Windows Server Manager 2008\ IIS and all other services, but without success.

  Is perhaps a few services that I forgot? Or other things?

  I thank for your feedback

  Solved

  HTTPS was not enabled in IIS on the server. Created a self-signed certificate and limits only the default Web page and it worked fine, locally and externally.

  / Magnus

• Cisco unity conn cluster integration with cucm cluster best practices

  Hi all

  I'm trying to integrate a cucm with a cluster of cuc 9.1 9.1 cluster. Some confusing points that I hope can be clarified.

  for cucm

  1. I created a voicemail with 48 ports server that will satisfy both servers of cuc

  for cuc

  I created a phone with two groups of ports system.

  two point of Group on the same server port voicemail prefix but different servers cuc. each pg also has a different sequence of the tftp servers.

  the problem with this design is that voice on the cucm ports not recorded with the port group that is configured to point to the cucsub. port groups cucpub point fits very well.

  Is how to configure the integration of a cluster of cuc. I saw the guides but it is more oriented towards stand-alone configurations.

  Help please!

  The SRND for CXN stipulates that all calls should be directed to the Subscriber with the Publisher handling overflow beyond the capabilities of the Subscriber and/or failover when the Subscriber is offline. They should not be balanced alternating.

  You can create two servers of voicemail with the wizard and give them separate device classes if you need to register for the various nodes of CCM.

  PS - You can also avoid this mess of all of the port on CUCM by integrating on SIP instead of SCCPS. In this case, you still have the CXN ports but they are only logical entities; CUCM has just a SIP trunk to each node. There is a separate for this integration guide.

  Please remember useful frequency responses and identify useful or correct answers.

• TMS and TCS Cluster

  We had two boxes of telepresence Content Server, as separate in TMS for a while now (TCS01 and TCS02)

  Recently, we grouped matches of two.  A day or two after having done this, the TCS02 device appears in TMS with an error "incorrect authentication information.  TCS01 is fine.

  Would we still followed the two devices separately in the TMS, or should we now be treated as a single device (via the pole DNS entry)?  Or is there a problem with TCS02 do we do?

  Hi Wayne,

  Try the steps below and let me know your comments.

  Here we must activate and change the API password in CHT management settings

  set a new password TCS (which is used for adding the TCS to the TMS
  Server)
  Connect to the web interface of TCS¹s go to

  Management > Configuration > Site Settings > API

  Ensure that the API is enabled. Choose a new password, and then save it.

  The user and the password in the settings of the API is the same user name and password
  who to be used when adding the TCS to the TMS

  Regrads

  Shyam

• Main Datacenter with multi cluster to a cluster of unique restoration. Is this possible?

  Hi gurus,

  I want to recover the only site with multi cluster having a vcenter to a recovery site which is to have a single cluster.

  Is this possible?

  Best regards

  Rushdi

  Yes, the mapping of resources collapse is possible.

• TMS with CUCM registered devices

  I'm reviewing a BOM for a customer, and the current proposal has:

  CUCM 9
  Lane Express Core
  Side of the highway
  TMS
  vTelepresence Server

  Finally, I have checked, we needed VCS control to allow some TMS plan the server TP. With the current software (CUCM 9.x, TMS 14.4, etc.) can I use TMS to annex CUCM registered endpoints and TP Server, if the server TP is to shared resources directly to CUCM? There is no conductor in this deployment. Looking for a validation test.

  THX,

  Rob

  Hi Rob,

  Since version 14.4, TMS supports the planning of bridges that are shared resources to the CUCM, so limiting earlier 'all bridges must be deployed on the side of VCS' is no longer valid.

  However: TMS can plan only telepresence servers who are in managed mode locally. Telepresence virtual servers don't support not mode managed locally, so if you want distributes them TMS, you will need to put a conductor in the mixture.

  Kind regards
  Kjetil

• Several digital test with labview cluster?

  Is it possible to make a numerical limit several test with the values of a cluster of a labview vi?

  So-called step "Multiple numerical limit", the data must be numeric. If the cluster already contains only numeric fields.

  Given that, I would throw the cluster within the module in a table (table Cluster). The downside of this is that all the fields of the table share the data type, so all are single or double or I32...

  Other solutions will not work with the default step type, but you can create your own type of step to accept a multiple similar to the digital cluster, which only accepts an array.

  Norbert

• Help with the cluster of scripture to PDM

  How to loop through a cluster and write the names of the elements and data in a readable human PDM file?

  The joint Save.vi DDHN gives an idea of what I want to do programmatically.  You can open the TDMS file created and you can see how I would want the file to look too.  I want the TDMS file to have human readable data so that it can be opened using the PDM Viewer.

  I searched the forums, lava and Google and I have experimented with the openG vi but I didn't think about her again.

  This nugget may give you some ideas.

  And before you click this link I'll tell you, "Ouch!"

  But do not give up to fast. Read the answers and other links. One of them, you should get where you want to go, if you choose to go there.

  Ben

• Help with the cluster in table for the cluster size difference, please!

  I will admit to still hurt with the berries of LabVIEW, and as usual, the behavior in the vi attached is meaningless to me!  The attached vi shows a cluster 6 element being converted into a table, then immediately to a cluster.  The reconstructed cluster has 9 elements, even if the table size indicator display properly 6.  How to maintain the initial cluster size when converting to and then since then, a table?

  The f

  Well, if you have worked with context-sensitive help running you would see:

  "With the right button of the function and select the Size of Cluster in the context menu to set the number of items in the cluster."

  The default is new. The maximum cluster size for this function is 256. »

  You must set the size. There is no way for the function to know how many elements in the table.

• Windows 2003 ent with storage cluster 2 and 2 nodes attached with it. It is possible to have a quorum failover?

  The scenario is that I have 2 DC and DR site and 1 storage connected with 1 node on both sites. The thing I have to do is cluster between two nodes if 1 went nodes then another are toggled but can failover storage level could be done by assigning 1 GB Lun as Quorum in both storage in both sites. I already grouped both nodes as local quorum.1st what I've done is MNS cluster but it does not fit our scenario.

  Hello

  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the Windows Server Forums on TechNet. Please post your question in the Windows Server Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

• PowerVault NX400. It is possible to work with a Cluster SQL Server 2012?

  Hello, a customer asks me if the current NAS solution, they (DELL PowerVault NX400) will allow them to work as a shared Volume of participating in a Cluster of SQL Server Cluster using SQL Server 2012. If no what others don't bottom end (for small businesses) will be used for these purposes? Receive your answer. What about Diego VP

  DiegoVp

  Thks. DevMgr.

  In this sense, whereas the NX400 comes with Windows STORAGE Server 2012, which has an iSCSI Target Server (as a service) will allow only external 2 servers (active, active cluster) running Windows Server 2012 to use NAS as shared storage?   .

  Yes, if you use the iSCSI target option on your NX400, you could actually use your NX400 as a SAN and allow other 2 servers run a shared storage cluster.

  A few things to keep in mind:

  -When your NX400 must restart (for finishing or any other reason), you will need to first down both your servers in cluster

  -I recommend putting on 2 separate subnets and switches iSCSI traffic (or at least isolated VLAN on 2 separate physical switches). In other words; Avoid iSCSI traffic running on your local network for reasons of reliability and performance. I'd read some of the documentation of Equallogic iSCSI switch to see how you configure switches for iSCSI.