UNI-DIRECTIONAL press UCS 6248 interconnections of fabric?

Hello

If possible, I'd like to see a UNI-DIRECTIONAL between my 5548 neighbor was cheating Nexus and my 6248 interconnection fabric.

UNI-DIRECTIONAL feature is supported by the 5548 s and easily activated.

However, I can't find any information on how to activate on the UCS FI ports uplink ethernet. Is this possible?

Thank you.

Hello

UNI-DIRECTIONAL UCS FINANCIAL support will be available in the next version major i.e UCSM 2.2

UNI-DIRECTIONAL feature is currently not available on the FI.

HTH

Padma

Tags: Cisco DataCenter

Similar Questions

  • VNX 5300 file shared storage - connect to Cisco UCS 6200 interconnection fabric

    Hello

    I'm designing a calculation and Shared Storage solution to help

    • EMC VNX 5300 shared storage

      • Block
      • File - sharing two Data Mover with i/o 10GE ports
    • Cisco UCS Blade Server Platform
      • Interconnection of Cisco UCS 6248 fabric
      • Chassis Cisco UCS 5108

    I have a question about where the connection Data movers with i/o 10GE ports. I connected to the 6248 UCS Cisco fabric interconnections or connect them to the switch IP network?

    kind is ok.

  • set up to bring the Fibre Channel between UCS of interconnection fiber and Nexus 5548UP.

    by using the following configuration between Nexus5k and UCS FI. the status of channel comes to ini and change to notConnected.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FC1/31 431 notConnected swl - 100 F
    FC1/32 431 notConnected swl - 100 F

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The system version: 5.2 (1) N1(1b)

    1 on FCoE
    1 active FEX
    active toy-channel-trunk 1
    interface vlan 1 on
    1 active LACP
    1 active LLDP
    1 active NPIV
    1 active sshServer
    1 on GANYMEDE
    1 active telnetServer
    Uni-directional active 1
    1 active VPC

    san-port-channel interface, 100
    active channel mode
    switchport mode F
    switchport trunk allowed vsan 431

    interface fc1/31
    switchport 'SAN PO to UCS - one' description
    channel-group 100
    no downtime

    interface fc1/32
    switchport 'SAN PO to UCS - one' description
    channel-group 100
    no downtime

    interface fc1/31
    switchport mode F
    interface fc1/32
    switchport mode F

    Help, please

    You must update your 5 k at least

    6.0 (2) N1 (2)

  • UNI-DIRECTIONAL on 1001 ASR feature

    Hello

    I have a router ASR 1001 last 3.9.2S current execution code.

    The Uni-directional feature was introduced in 3.9 S

    However...

    With the license of IPBase the Uni-directional command does not appear in configuration mode.

    But when I activate the trial license AdvancedIPServices and restart, the UNI-DIRECTIONAL command appears now in Setup mode.

    I don't see that it documented anywhere in the reference command/notes version IOS XE etc. you need to have the Advanced IP Services feature set allowed to use UNI-DIRECTIONAL on the ASR feature 1001. Anyone know if this is correct or is it an error or a bug?

    See you soon

    Hello

    Which can be seen in the browser functionality. If you select s 3.9 and Ip Base you want to see the unidirectional link detection section (you can filter by function name using like match stringUniDir). If you select Advanced featureset Services - you will find in the list.

    Niko

  • UNI-DIRECTIONAL normal/aggressive with several neighbors

    Hello

    We lack 4 c4500 switches to 2 sites linked together through the layer 2 cryptographic boxes and VPLS in a point-to-multipoint configuration which is completely transparent (it's more or less like connecting them via a Hub - each switch sees the other 3 as neighbours).

    Our basic configs have Uni-directional globally active in aggressive mode.

    I wanted to only disable interfaces (routed ports) to crypto boxes, because I don't want their ErrDisabled for 5 minutes if there is connectivity problems in the VPLS-cloud (each switch also had 3 UNI-DIRECTIONAL due to the P2MP configuration neighbors).

    Mode config-if I could do it simply with 'disable the port Uni-Directional', but I thougt it would be better (not aggressive) normal mode execution for the chance to use UNI-DIRECTIONAL-show commands. So, I have configured 'Uni-directional port' for the affected interfaces.

    interface GigabitEthernet1/2

    Uni-directional port

    !

    Parts of the show command:

    ! P2MP port to crypto-box

    Interface item in gi1/2

    Port enable the administrative configuration setting: enabled

    Port enable operational state: enabled

    (...)

    ! standard port with the default configuration

    Gi2/1 interface

    Port enable the setting of administrative configuration: default of the unit follows

    Port enable operational state: active / aggressive mode

    (...)

    I was very surprised to discover that a single interface will still in State of ErrDisable after discovering an error UNI-DIRECTIONAL:

    % UNI-DIRECTIONAL-4-UDLD_PORT_DISABLED: UNI-DIRECTIONAL disabled interface item in gi1/2, detected one-way binding

    % Of PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: Uni-directional error detected on item in gi1/2, by putting the gi1/2 item in condition of err - disable

    Now, I'm stumped: have I misunderstood the difference between normal and aggressive mode? Or something wrong with my setup?

    IOS version: 12.2 (54) SG

    Thank you

    Rolf

    What I don't understand is why it ends up in errdisable state when it's configured in normal mode.

    You have configured UNI-DIRECTIONAL on BOTH sides right?

    If the answer is Yes, then I recommend that you enable the record link "enable connection logging" on the interface to determine if you have a potential problem with this link.

    Furthermore, this link is the fiber optic, no?

    If this is not the case, UNI-DIRECTIONAL is good if you have fiber.  I would recommend not UNI-DIRECTIONAL on a link of copper.

  • Noisy fan UCS 6248 fabric Interconnect noise RPM

    Hello

    Our pair of interconnection fabric installed 6248 produce a FAN noise.

    Is it possible to reduce their RPM? So can be more silent? The server room have good air conditioning.

    Some newspapers like below:

    Fabric - Has (nxos) # show the fan environment details

    Fan:
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Module fan air Speed (%)  Speed
    Direction
    ---------------------------------------------------
    1 1 front-to-Back 60 15428
    1 front-to-Back 2 60 11065
    1 front-to-Back 3 60 14835
    1 front-to-Back 4 60 10997
    2 1 front-to-Back 60-15000
    2 front-to-Back 2 60 11134
    2 3 front-to-Back 14835 60
    2 front-to-Back 4 60 11065

    Power supply:
    -----------------------------------
    Configured module air flow
    Direction speed (%)
    -----------------------------------
    Front-to-1 Back 60
    2 front-to-Back 60
    Fabric-A (nxos) #.

    Fabric-A (nxos) #.
    Fabric - A (nxos) # show environment

    Fan:
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Fan model Hw status
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Chassis-1 UCS-FAN-6248UP - ok
    Chassis-2 UCS-FAN-6248UP - ok
    PS - 1 UCS-PSU-6248UP-AC - ok
    PS - 2 UCS-PSU-6248UP-AC - ok

    Temperature
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    MajorThresh MinorThres CurTemp sensor module status
    (Celsius)     (Celsius)    (Celsius)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    1 ok taken 67 58 35

    Power supply:
    Voltage: 12 Volts
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    PS model power input power state
    Type (Watts) (Amp)
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    UCS-PSU-6248UP-AC AC 780,00 65.00 1 ok
    2 UCS-PSU-6248UP-AC AC 780,00 65.00 ok

    Model power power power power status mod
    Asked asked allocated allocated
    (Watts)   (Amp)       (Watts)   (Amp)
    --- ----------------------  -------   ----------  --------- ----------  ----------
    UCS-FI-6248UP-SUP 492,00 41,00 41,00 492,00 1 power
    UCS-FI-DL2 24.00 3 2.00 24.00 2.00 under tension

    Summary of the use of power:
    --------------------
    Power supply redundancy mode: redundant
    Operational mode of power supply redundancy: redundant

    Total power 1560.00 W

    Reserved for directors of research 492,00 W of power
    Power currently used by Modules 24.00 W

    -------------
    Available power 1044.00 total W
    -------------
    Fabric-A (nxos) #.

    Felipe,

    Please open a TAC case to see if the problem is in the hardware level (a show of UCSM tech will be necessary) an engineering failure analysis may be needed to determine what is happening.

    -Kenny

  • Connection no UCS server to the fabric of interconnection 6248

    We are migrating our VMS of Dell PowerEdge servers to Cisco UCS environment 620\710. The question has been ask if we can connect our Dell servers directly to the IF SFP ports + and/or the connection of TP will 10 GB. Is this possible? How does the FIs treat non - UCS servers?

    This is not supported! I guess you want to do vmotion and transfer your Dell to UCS Server VM. Just configure the appropriate network connectivity (vlan UCS to Northbound Dell server) and it should work.

  • Use of external ports on the fabric of the UCS of interconnections

    Hello everyone

    We have a new UCS with 2 fabric interconnects and I want to uplink the ISCSI NICS to an external server not cisco.   What I read, it looks like using a port of the device is the way to go.  However I have noticed on the port configuration of the server, he does not see the VLAN already defined.  The server communicates only with a SAN upstream on our main switch;  If you define a VLAN separately on external does this mean if my server had to communicate with a blade of Cisco low flow to send traffic to the base and then back down even though he was on the same VLAN?  Just try to understand it.  Would it not be better to configure the mode switch?   I know that you will lose some functionality with mode switch.

    Thank you

    Jason,

    I don't ' know if you've already read, but here's the doc of a connectivity device port.

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/servers-unified-computing/UCS-...

    Thank you

    Saurabh

  • The question about the interconnections of fabric UCS 6300 Series

    Hello

    I have a question about UCS 6300 Series fabric interconnects. Is this fabric UCS interconnections 6300 series integrated into the extension of tissue function?  The reason why I asked this question was, when there is 6300 series fabric has been plugged UCS 5100 chassis, there is no more space to plug in extension of UCS 2200 series fabric. My understanding on the topology of the UCS, tissue extender is the connection between the blade and the fabric of the interconnections.

    Thank you

    Bob

    Hi Bob

    Yes, that's correct!

    The chassis so called FI - IOM (see attachment p52); THE IOM = FEX.

    I/O of the blade adapter to connect inside basket chassis, which connects to the built-in IOM.

    IOM is then connected to the built-in FI.

  • Adding ports to a vlan on interconnection of fabric (end-host Mode)

    Hi all

    I have a problem, I have created vlan 99 and added the ports and port channels to the vlan on the fabric of the ucs interconnections and saved the configs.

    To my surprise, that nothing has changed, they are still on the vlan 1 (the default).

    See my setup below.

    UCS - A eth-link # rising scope
    UCS - Has/eth-uplink # create vlan EMM_NET 99
    UCS - Has/eth-storage / vlan * # create member-port has 15 1
    UCS - Has/eth-storage / vlan * # create member-port a 16 1
    UCS - Has/eth-storage / vlan * # create portchannel members a 61
    UCS - Has/eth-uplink / vlan * # set no sharing
    UCS - Has/eth-uplink / vlan * # commit buffer
    UCS - Has / eth-uplink/vlan #.

    Or should I just create vlan 99 on the switch to the North (Nexus5548UP) because the fabric of interconnection is in fine host mode?

    Kind regards

    OK, now you must give us more detailed information?

    What is your OS? ESXi?

    And maybe, depending on how your host is configured, you should make 99 Vlan as vlan native!

  • Interconnection of fabric as FC switch

    Hello

    can we use a 6120 as a FC switch interconnection, so do the CF normal zoning stuff and connect directly to some CF storage to the FC expansion ports, or do we need run the interconnection in NPV mode and connect it to a switch taking NPIV.

    Kind regards

    John

    If my memory is good, you will need to use the VAN.  Direct attach storage support comes in v1.4, which is due to be released in January.

    Adam

  • Name of the system of the interconnections of fabric can be changed

    I need to change the name of the fabric of interconnection system

    I gave for example. EDCD

    the IFS have now EDCD-A

    EDCD-B

    I need to change it to... PEPE-A

    PEPE-B...

    is this possible?

    Shyam,

    You can certainly do it and for sure are not disruptive and take effect immediately.    Simply go to the Admin tab > all > Management Interfaces > name > edit with you > Apply.

    It is as simple and quick as if at the same time, you have a SSH session, as soon as you change the name, the system made the change on your SSH session also.

    Note: There is no need to look for the way to do this on every fabric. The name you are editing is for both financial institutions and the system then adds the XYA -has or XYA -B by itself.

    Note THE answers useful.

    -Kenny

  • UCS 6248 licenses

    UCS 6248UP licenses

    Ports configured as Fibre Channel will also consume a license of port?

    I think it's always to answer

    I tried different configurations with netformx and it seems that the ports configured as CF don't consume licenses. Is this correct?

    Pedro,

    Yes it is that all the physical ports have a license associated with it.

    Thank you

    Eric

  • Why the interconnections of fabric can be connected to the two MDS?

    Hi all

    1. why the white paper below says that if FI is connected to two MDS, then it will create a single point of failure?

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/storage-networking/MDS-9500-series-multilayer-directors/white_paper_c11_586100.html

    This image below is used to describe the scenario for question 2 to 4.

    2 and why the SAN design best practices to create SAN A and SAN B? Where when the switch 1 has failed, then it will use the b in SAN. And in this case, user can configure to connect to the storage using SAN B first, instead of using SAN first? And by default, the behavior of the SAN like that, what I mean is that she will check SAN failed, then it will use SAN B?

    3. and why there is no connection between the left more server and switch 2? They can not who design when switch 1 has failed, then it will use the other link first to switch 2, by linking the left more server for 2? Then when the core SAN switch one down, he uses the SAN B connection.

    4. can you the server to different SAN multipath? In this case, SAN A and B.

    Thank you

    Osbin

    Hi Osbin,

    Why the white paper below says that if FI is connected to two MDS, then it will create a single point of failure?

    Protocol FC build tissue, using the FSPF (such as OSPF) of the Protocol in order to MDS, FI (switch mode) Nexus 5 k, 7 k (storage VDC) form a single fabric using the links intercommutation.

    If a problem is occur in tissue alone device's problem (zoning, FSPF, EENT)

    If you connect fabric and fabric B (connect a FI for switch 1 and switch 2) in other words, this is no fabric A and B - it became a unique fabric (fabric single = single point of failure). That's why we use two FI, connected to two independent fabrics (isolation and redundancy)

    Technically, you can avoid this problem by using VSANS, but if some problem in a NX - OS or SAN - OS occure you may lose the two fabrics in a single failure (the worst of the world SAN)

    2 and why the SAN design best practices to create SAN A and SAN B? Where when the switch 1 has failed, then it will use the b in SAN. And in this case, user can configure to connect to the storage using SAN B first, instead of using SAN first? And by default, the behavior of the SAN like that, what I mean is that she will check SAN failed, then it will use SAN B?

    Point main initiator is in the answer above, can use both at the same time (multipath) fabrics with special drivers.

    It is configurable by the user to use any fabric (A and B - is just for engineers) first.

    It depends on the OS and drivers.

    3. and why there is no connection between the left more server and switch 2?

    I believe that this picture is schematic diagram and imagine if you have enough ports in the switch 1

    They can not who design when switch 1 has failed, then it will use the other link first to switch 2, by linking the left more server for 2?

    Remember the idea of FC fabric. If you spend 1 it will affect every single switch fabric, and it is much faster to use stable fabric B instead of A fabric converging.

    Then when the core SAN switch one down, he uses the SAN B connection.

    4. can you the server to different SAN multipath? In this case, SAN A and B.

    Yes

    Best regards

    Alex

  • Open PDFfile generated by a running process, directly press BTN

    Greetings!

    Based on certain requirements, I designed a process as explained...

    User enters certain values on the screen, hit 'SUBMIT & PRINT' button. I create a process instance, and calling the monitor page bias then users will their current instance Gets the output file.

    Is there anyway we could open a window with the PDF file of actual output directly after hitting the button? I don't want to go throug the monitor process users and etc...

    We are 8,47 tools. (HRMS).

    Can anyone pls give me some advice if possible.

    Thanks in advance

    I have implemented this type of solution at a customer site in PT8.22 of 2-3 years and is still currently used. We had a total of 60,000 + with over 3-5 k concurrent users during peak user base. We encountered an obstacle when you 'sleep' peoplecode method, such that some process scheduler tables were outfits/locked until the process completes post that basically makes each process executed sequentially. A statement commit simple just before the current fixed things "sleep." On the 8.4 x clients, we chose to use the REN server instead of this method, it is easier without the custom pcode and not as CPU intensive.

Maybe you are looking for