Using L2TP xconnect on 7600/ss20

Similar Questions

• Get 810 error message when you try to connect to the VPN using L2TP protocol

  Original title: L2TP will not let me connect.

  I am in Workstation 9 and in each virtual machine, I have an AD - DC (2K8R2Enterprise), CA and RRAS (2K8R2Enterprise) and my last vm is a win7 (they are all tests).  All are not updated, but the PPTP, IKEv2 work without problem.  The second server that has the CAs and RRAS is a member of the AD - DC server.  The Win7 is not on the domain and I have Win7 a client certificate.  I have ensured that the CA root of trust is in the user store and computer Trusted Root CA.  I have also ensured that the Win7 client certificate is in the user store and personal computer.  I get a 810 error message when I try to connect to the VPN using the L2TP protocol.  I have exhaustively studied this problem and I can't find a solution to this problem.  I also raise the functional level of the domain to 2K8R2.

  I think this should be a simple and easy solution, but where can I find the answer?
  Please help me.
  Thank you for your time.
  Allan.

  Hi Allan,

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the Forum TechNet site:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro

  If you need any other assistance, let know us and we would be happy to help you.

• Unable to connect to the Cisco VPN you use native client: El Capitan

  I'm unable to connect to the Cisco VPN using native client server Cisco OSX via IPSec. Before the upgrade for connections VPN El Capitan has worked without any problems. VPN uses the shared secret of group. It seems, I get the error "raccoon [2580] ': could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe ' during the connection."

  When I upgraded to El Capitan, VPN connection has stopped working. I tried to do the following:

  * connect using the old work VPN connection: without success

  Config: Hand [server address, account name],

  AUTH settings [shared secret, the Group name].

  Advanced [mode to use the passive FTP = TRUE]

  errors:

  "authd [124]: copy_rights: _server_authorize failed.

  "raccoon [2580]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe"

  ...

  * Add new VPN connection using L2TP over IPSec: without success

  Config: Hand [server address, account name],

  Authentication settings [user authentication: password, identification of the Machine: Shared Secret].

  Advanced [send all traffic on the VPN = TRUE]

  errsors:

  "pppd [2616]: password not found in the system keychain.

  "authd [124]: copy_rights: _server_authorize failed.

  ...

  
  

  * Add new connection using Cisco via IPSec VPN: without success

  Main config: [server address, account name].

  AUTH settings [shared secret, the Group name].

  Advanced [mode to use the passive FTP = TRUE]

  errors:

  "authd [124]: copy_rights: _server_authorize failed.

  "raccoon [2580]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe"

  VPN server is high and does not work and accepts connections, this problem is entirely on the client side.

  I. Journal of Console app existing/Legacy VPN connection:

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 000 syslogd [40]: sender ASL statistics

  26/03/16 10:24:01, nesessionmanager 311 [2112]: NESMLegacySession [VPN_CONN_NAME$: B7816CCC-2D2C-4D6D - 83 D 9-B2C8B6EB8589]: received an order to start SystemUIServer [2346]

  26/03/16 10:24:01, nesessionmanager 311 [2112]: NESMLegacySession [VPN_CONN_NAME$: B7816CCC-2D2C-4D6D - 83 D 9-B2C8B6EB8589]: changed to connecting status

  26/03/16 10:24:01, nesessionmanager 313 [2112]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 316 nesessionmanager [2112]: phase 1 of the IPSec from.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 338 [2580]: agreed to the takeover of vpn connection.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 338 [2580]: agreed to the takeover of vpn connection.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 339 [2580]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 339 [2580]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 339 [2580]: connection.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 339 [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 339 [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 349 [2580]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 350 [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 350 [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 381 [2580]: no message must be encrypted, 0x14a1, side 0 status

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 381 [2580]: no message must be encrypted, 0x14a1, side 0 status

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 381 nesessionmanager [2112]: Controller IPSec: IKE FAILED. phase 2, assert 0

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 381 nesessionmanager [2112]: Controller IPSec: retry the aggressive mode IPSec with DH group 2

  26/03/16 10:24:01, nesessionmanager 404 [2112]: phase 1 of the IPSec from.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 404 [2580]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 404 [2580]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 405 [2580]: connection.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 405 [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 405 [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 407 raccoon [2580]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 407 raccoon [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 407 raccoon [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 436 [2580]: port 62465 anticipated, but 0

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 436 [2580]: port 62465 anticipated, but 0

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: IKEv1 Phase 1 AUTH: success. (Initiator, aggressive-Mode Message 2).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began with a peer

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began with a peer

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 2 message).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: initiating IKEv1 Phase 1: success. (Initiator, aggressive Mode).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 3 message).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 established (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 463 raccoon [2580]: IPSec Phase 1 established (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 484 raccoon [2580]: IPSec Extended requested authentication.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 484 raccoon [2580]: IPSec Extended requested authentication.

  26/03/16 10:24:01, nesessionmanager 485 [2112]: IPSec asking extended authentication.

  [26/03/16 10:24:01, 494 nesessionmanager [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:B7816CCC-2D2C-4D6D-83D9-B2C8B6EB8589]: status changed by disconnecting

  26/03/16 10:24:01, 495 nesessionmanager [2112]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Information message).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: IKEv1-Information Notice: pass success. (Delete the ISAKMP Security Association).

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 495 [2580]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe

  [26/03/16 10:24:01, 496 nesessionmanager [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:B7816CCC-2D2C-4D6D-83D9-B2C8B6EB8589]: status changed to offline, last stop reason no

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 496 [2580]: glob found no match for the path "/ var/run/racoon/*.conf".

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 496 [2580]: glob found no match for the path "/ var/run/racoon/*.conf".

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 496 [2580]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:24:01, racoon 496 [2580]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  $VPN_SERVER_IP

  II. new VPN connection using L2TP over IPSec Console app log:

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetFillColorWithColor: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetStrokeColorWithColor: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetCompositeOperation: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetCompositeOperation: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextFillRects: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetCompositeOperation: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextClipToRect: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetShouldSmoothFonts: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetFontSmoothingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 293 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetFontAntialiasingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetFontSmoothingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetDefaultUserSpaceToDeviceSpaceTransform: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextConcatCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextDrawImages: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetShouldSmoothFonts: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextGetFontSmoothingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetFontSmoothingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, 294 com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539]: CGContextSetFontSmoothingStyle: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetDefaultUserSpaceToDeviceSpaceTransform: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539 295]: CGContextConcatCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextDrawImages: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetDefaultUserSpaceToDeviceSpaceTransform: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice [2539 295]: CGContextConcatCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextSaveGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextDrawImages: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextRestoreGState: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:26, [2539 295] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: CGContextGetCTM: context invalid 0x0. If you want to see the trail, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environment variable.

  26/03/16 10:37:28, [2539 339] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: error in CoreDragRemoveTrackingHandler:-1856

  26/03/16 10:37:28, [2539 339] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: error in CoreDragRemoveReceiveHandler:-1856

  26/03/16 10:37:28, com.apple.xpc.launchd [1 393]: (com.apple.SystemUIServer.agent [2346]) Service was released due to the signal: Broken pipe: 13

  26/03/16 10:37:28, Spotlight 461 [459]: spot: logging agent

  26/03/16 10:37:28, [2539 487] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: service - area of the one error ERROR = NEConfigurationErrorDomain Code = 9 "configuration is unchanged" UserInfo = {NSLocalizedDescription = configuration is unchanged}

  26/03/16 10:37:28, [2539 487] com.apple.preference.network.remoteservice: service - area of the one error ERROR = NEConfigurationErrorDomain Code = 9 "configuration is unchanged" UserInfo = {NSLocalizedDescription = configuration is unchanged}

  26/03/16 10:37:28, nesessionmanager 519 [2112]: NESMLegacySession [VPN_CONN_NAME$: 04c 10954-16 b 2 - 40BB - B3F1 - 9288F968029E]: received an order to start com.apple.preference.network.re [2539]

  26/03/16 10:37:28, nesessionmanager 519 [2112]: NESMLegacySession [VPN_CONN_NAME$: 04c 10954-16 b 2 - 40BB - B3F1 - 9288F968029E]: changed to connecting status

  26/03/16 10:37:28, com.apple.SecurityServer [75 536]: rules of problem opening the file "/ etc/authorization ': no such file or directory

  26/03/16 10:37:28, com.apple.SecurityServer [75 536]: sandbox has denied authorizing the right "system.keychain.modify" customer "/ usr/libexec/nehelper" [184]

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 536 pppd [2616]: NetworkExtension is the controller

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 538 pppd [2616]: NetworkExtension is the controller

  26/03/16 10:37:28, nehelper 540 [184]: 10954-16 b 2 - 40BB - B3F1 04c - 9288F968029E: cannot copy content, returned SecKeychainItemCopyContent user interaction is not allowed.

  26/03/16 10:37:28, nehelper 540 [184]: 10954-16 b 2 - 40BB - B3F1 04c - 9288F968029E: SecKeychainItemFreeContent returned the user interaction is not allowed.

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 570 pppd [2616]: password not found in the system keychain

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 572 pppd [2616]: publish_entry SCDSet() failed: success!

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 573 pppd [2616]: publish_entry SCDSet() failed: success!

  26/03/16 10:37:28, 573 pppd [2616]: pppd 2.4.2 (Apple version 809.40.5) started by $VPN_SERVER_USER, uid 501

  26/03/16 10:37:28, SystemUIServer 620 [2615]: [BluetoothHIDDeviceController] EventServiceConnectedCallback

  26/03/16 10:37:28, SystemUIServer 620 [2615]: [BluetoothHIDDeviceController] EventServiceDisconnectedCallback

  26/03/16 10:37:28, authd 720 [124]: copy_rights: _server_authorize failed

  26/03/16 10:37:28, sandboxd 748 [120]: nehelper (184) ([184]) refuse the authorization-right-get system.keychain.modify

  III. New connection of Cisco VPN through IPSec Console app log:

  26/03/16 10:18:26, 917 WindowServer [172]: _CGXRemoveWindowFromWindowMovementGroup: 0x10d of window is not attached to the window 0x10f

  26/03/16 10:19:43, 975 WindowServer [172]: _CGXRemoveWindowFromWindowMovementGroup: 0x10d of window is not attached to the window 0x10f

  [26/03/16 10:19:56 nesessionmanager 265 [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:72874CC0-2A89-4B61-80F1-9BB4F3EA953B]: received an order to start SystemUIServer [2346]

  [26/03/16 10:19:56 nesessionmanager 265 [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:72874CC0-2A89-4B61-80F1-9BB4F3EA953B]: changed to connecting status

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 267 [2112]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 270 [2112]: phase 1 of the IPSec from.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, authd 284 [124]: copy_rights: _server_authorize failed

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 295 raccoon [2576]: agreed to the takeover of vpn connection.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 295 raccoon [2576]: agreed to the takeover of vpn connection.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 295 raccoon [2576]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 295 raccoon [2576]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 296 [2576]: connection.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 296 [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 296 [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 308 [2576]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 308 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 308 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 352 raccoon [2576]: no message must be encrypted, 0x14a1, side 0 status

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 352 raccoon [2576]: no message must be encrypted, 0x14a1, side 0 status

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 352 [2112]: Controller IPSec: IKE FAILED. phase 2, assert 0

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 353 [2112]: Controller IPSec: retry the aggressive mode IPSec with DH group 2

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 373 [2112]: phase 1 of the IPSec from.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 374 raccoon [2576]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 374 raccoon [2576]: IPSec to connect to the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 374 raccoon [2576]: connection.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 374 raccoon [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 374 raccoon [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 376 [2576]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 376 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 376 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 404 [2576]: port 62465 anticipated, but 0

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 404 [2576]: port 62465 anticipated, but 0

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: IKEv1 Phase 1 AUTH: success. (Initiator, aggressive-Mode Message 2).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began with a peer

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began with a peer

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 2 message).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: initiating IKEv1 Phase 1: success. (Initiator, aggressive Mode).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 432 [2576]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 3 message).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 433 raccoon [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 established (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 433 raccoon [2576]: IPSec Phase 1 established (initiated by me).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 453 [2576]: IPSec Extended requested authentication.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 453 [2576]: IPSec Extended requested authentication.

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 454 nesessionmanager [2112]: IPSec asking extended authentication.

  [26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 464 [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:72874CC0-2A89-4B61-80F1-9BB4F3EA953B]: status changed by disconnecting

  26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 464 [2112]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Information message).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: IKEv1-Information Notice: pass success. (Delete the ISAKMP Security Association).

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe

  26/03/16 10:19:56, racoon 465 [2576]: could not send message vpn_control: Broken pipe

  [26/03/16 10:19:56, nesessionmanager 465 [2112]: NESMLegacySession[$VPN-CONN-NAME:72874CC0-2A89-4B61-80F1-9BB4F3EA953B]: status changed to offline, last stop reason no

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 466 raccoon [2576]: glob found no match for the path "/ var/run/racoon/*.conf".

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 466 raccoon [2576]: glob found no match for the path "/ var/run/racoon/*.conf".

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 466 raccoon [2576]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  26/03/16 10:19:56, 466 raccoon [2576]: IPSec disconnection from the server $VPN_SERVER_IP

  It seems that I solved the problem, but I'm not sure it helped.

  After restart of the operating system, the two connections: old and new Cisco via IPSec connection, began to work.

• WinXP L2TP, Linksys in Pix 6.2 - FIXED

  PIX 515e 6.2 at the central office, VPN Linksys at the remote office L2L, trying to install WinXP SP3 & Vista VPN remote clients using L2TP.  First question: is it even possible, without using the Cisco VPN client or the upgrade of the Pix OS?  Second question: if it's possible, what's wrong with my current config?  The L2L VPN works fine, but when the Windows XP client attempts to connect, that's what I get:

  ISAKMP (0): atts are acceptable.IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1,
  
    (key eng. msg.) dest= (PIX outside address), src= (WinXP outside address),
  
      dest_proxy= (PIX outside address)/255.255.255.255/17/1701 (type=1),
  
      src_proxy= (WinXP internal address)/255.255.255.255/17/1701 (type=1),
  
      protocol= ESP, transform= esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ,
  
      lifedur= 0s and 0kb,
  
      spi= 0x0(0), conn_id= 0, keysize= 0, flags= 0x0
  
  IPSEC(validate_transform_proposal): proxy identities not supported
  
  IPSEC(validate_proposal_request): proposal part #1,
  
    (key eng. msg.) dest= (PIX outside address), src= (WinXP outside address),
  
      dest_proxy= (PIX outside address)/255.255.255.255/17/1701 (type=1),
  
      src_proxy= (WinXP internal address)/255.255.255.255/17/1701 (type=1),
  
      protocol= ESP, transform= esp-3des esp-sha-hmac ,
  
      lifedur= 0s and 0kb,
  
      spi= 0x0(0), conn_id= 0, keysize= 0, flags= 0x0
  
  IPSEC(validate_transform_proposal): proxy identities not supported
  
  ISAKMP: IPSec policy invalidated proposal
  
  ISAKMP : Checking IPSec proposal 2
  
  

  6.2 (2) version PIX
  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
  Sysopt connection permit-pptp
  Sysopt connection permit-l2tp
  Sysopt pl compatible ipsec
  No sysopt route dnat

  IP CO_WAN 255.255.224.0 allow Access-list sheep Remote_LAN 255.255.255.0
  IP DMZ_LAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list sheep Remote_LAN 255.255.255.0
  IP CO_LAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list sheep 10.100.100.0 255.255.255.0

  IP pool local VPNPool 10.100.100.100 - 10.100.100.110

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
  Sysopt connection permit-pptp
  Sysopt connection permit-l2tp
  Sysopt pl compatible ipsec
  No sysopt route dnat

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac LINKSYS_TS
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac WINCLIENT_TS
  Crypto ipsec transform-set transit mode WINCLIENT_TS
  Dynamic crypto map L2TP 30 game of transformation-WINCLIENT_TS

  ONLYMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  card crypto ONLYMAP 10 correspondence address sheep
  card crypto ONLYMAP 10 set pfs group2
  card crypto ONLYMAP 10 set peer LINKSYS_IP
  crypto ONLYMAP 10 the transform-set LINKSYS_TS value card
  map ONLYMAP 600-isakmp dynamic L2TP ipsec crypto
  ONLYMAP interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside
  ISAKMP key * address LINKSYS_IP netmask 255.255.255.255
  ISAKMP key * address 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0
  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10
  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption
  ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash
  10 2 ISAKMP policy group
  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20
  ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption
  ISAKMP policy 20 chopping sha
  20 2 ISAKMP policy group
  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 28800

  VPDN group WINCLIENTS accept l2tp call
  VPDN group ppp authentication pap WINCLIENTS
  VPDN group WINCLIENTS client configuration address local VPNPool
  VPDN group WINCLIENTS customer DNS_IP dns configuration
  VPDN group customer WINCLIENTS of local authentication
  VPDN Hello 60 of the l2tp tunnel of the WINCLIENTS group
  VPDN username username password *.
  VPDN allow outside

  Furthermore, I don't play with this old code of 6.2. If it does not support NAT - T and the customer is behind the NAT device, it could cause the problem. Some NAT device has the VPN-passthrough feature, you can turn it on and try.

• Chrombook L2TP/IPSec for ASA 5510

  Hello

  I have trouble getting a chromebook to establish a remote access connection VPN using L2TP/IPsec for a Cisco ASA 5510 12 7.2 (5) running.

  Run a debug crypto isakmp 5 I see the following logs (ip changed...)

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Oakley proposal is acceptable

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 1.1.1.1, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 1 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 4

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, status of automatic NAT detection: remote endpoint IS behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, connection landed on tunnel_group DefaultRAGroup

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, previously allocated memory of liberation for permission-dn-attributes

  06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

  06 jan 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.1, Keep-alive type for this connection: DPD

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, timer to generate a new key to start P1: 8100 seconds.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID remote Proxy Host: address 3.3.3.3, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, data received in payload ID local Proxy Host: address 2.2.2.2, 17 of the Protocol, Port 1701

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, detected L2TP/IPSec session.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, QM IsRekeyed its not found old addr

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto, check card = outside_map, seq = 1...

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, static checking Card Crypto Card = outside_map, seq = 1, ACL does not proxy IDs src:1.1.1.1 dst: 2.2.2.2

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, only Tunnel UDP-encapsulated and UDP-encapsulated-Transport mode NAT-Traversal-defined selection

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, remote peer IKE configured crypto card: outside_dyn_map0

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, ITS processing IPSec payload

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, proposals of any IPSec security association has deemed unacceptable.

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, error QM WSF (P2 struct & 0x3d48800, mess id 0xce12c3dc).

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, history of mistake IKE responder QM WSF (struct & 0x3d48800) , : QM_DONE EV_ERROR--> QM_BLD_MSG2 EV_NEGO_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK--> QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent--> QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH

  Jan 06 09:58:06 [IKEv1]: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 1.1.1.1, removing counterpart table correlator failed, no match!

  1.1.1.1 = address remote chromebook NAT

  2.2.2.2 = ASA 5510 acting as distance termintaion access point

  3.3.3.3 = Chromebook private address

  I noticed that the Chromebook is appearing as the ID of the remote proxy but later, he seeks the applied to the Chromebook NAT address.  Not sure if this is the cause or how to solve this problem, if it is.

  Can someone advise please

  Thank you

  Ryan

  7.2 is old code.  You can re - test with 9.0.x or 9.1.x.

  https://support.Google.com/Chromebook/answer/1282338?hl=en

• VPN using Windows Native Client

  Is there a way to use the native Windows VPN Clients in collaboration with the ASA 5520 running IOS 8.0? XP and Vista. I prefer to use them because I have several custom applcations that trigger the windows VPN Client. To work around the problem I just enabled passthrough and have the vpn running on another server but I would prefer it to be on of the SAA.

  Thank you.

  Looks like you want to use L2TP over IPSEC, below is a link on how to configure this on the SAA;

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807213a7.shtml

  HTH.

• Documentation for cisco asa ipsec l2tp / windows 7

  Hello

  I need to configure a few cisco asa 5510's for remote access VPN using l2tp ipsec.  One of the requirements is that no additional vpn clients to connect.  We only use the client included in Windows 7 x 86.  Is there documentation on configuration of this device or a clear statement by saying that it is not taken in charge or possible yet?

  Thank you

  m.

  Hey well at least on the errors of phase 1 more.

  ASA is basically saying that's not the choice of the proposal.

  Here's what is configured...
  -------

  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set
  Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  -------

  Here is what is proped:

  -----

  (1) proposal payload

  Protocol-Id: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP

  Transform-Id: ESP_AES

  Encapsulation mode: the UDP Transport
  Key length: 128
  Authentication algorithm: SHA1

  (2) proposal payload

  Protocol-Id: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP

  Transform-Id: ESP_3DES

  Encapsulation mode: the UDP Transport
  Authentication algorithm: SHA1

  (3) proposal payload

  Protocol-Id: PROTO_IPSEC_ESP

  Transform-Id: ESP_DES

  Encapsulation mode: the UDP Transport
  Authentication algorithm: SHA1

  ------------------

  Please also visit:

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/l2tp_ips.html

  I see that you have 1 default set PFS is 0.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/C5.html#wp2193372

  NAT-traversal missing?

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/l2tp_ips.html#wp1046219

• L2TP or pptp outbound on a SAA?

  Hello

  I have an ASA5505 I want to use to connect to the commercial vpn server.

  Servers VPN provider windows users and the support of pptp, l2tp, and sstp clients

  My machine windows 7 connects to it using l2tp/ipsec or pptp.   There is a username/password and the shared key

  So... I prefer to use my ASA5505 for this instead of my windows box.

  I know that the ASA can act as an L2TP server, but can it be configured for L2TP or PPTP outgoing?

  I have a reference for this IOS feature, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t2/feature/guide/gtvoltun.html#wp1027129

  But have not been able to find the Info for the ASA

  Thanks in advance

  ASA cannot be configured as PPTP or L2TP client. It can support a PPTP or L2TP server you posted earlier.

  Typically for PPTP and L2TP, you can only connect from a host (windows machines), not a network device.

  Hope that answers your question.

• Instructions for managing macs w ARD on the internet (no static IP address)

  Please excuse me if it's asked all the time, but I searched and can not find detailed instructions for this.

  I need to manage more than one Mac, on connections to the internet, the devices will not be on the static IP, they will constantly be moving around.

  All the videos I have found online seem to show how to connect and manage Macs on LANs w ARD.

  Details:

  ARD v3.8

  All Mac on El Capitan

  Very appreciated for any help!

  This question is not particularly related to Apple Remote Desktop; for ARD.  This is a configuration of generic firewall and networking question, so good enough instructions for your specific firewall will work here, as long as the firewall can redirect ports - port TCP 5900, in this case - or if your particular firewall has a VPN - Firewall Server average range and high-end frequently - or if you can implement a VPN server behind your firewall and configure the firewall to forward the VPN protocols (different ports) and ports necessary for the particular VPN.

  In general...  I would suggest three ways...   1: set up your firewall to port before port TCP 5900 to the client target.   Maybe TCP 5988.   Or set up a VPN server in your firewall and connect to that and use ARD via a VPN.    If you want to access more than one system on the target network, you will need to either use a range of ports to forward to specific systems behind your firewall and happens to be a problem with many customers - I don't know immediately off-hand if the ARD client allows even to select different target ports - or to set up and move to a VPN.    2: creation and configuration of the VPN server in the firewall allows access to all systems on your network target - a VPN connection makes your local system as it is directly connected to the target network.  3: If you have the VPN server running on a target system and accessible through the firewall port forwarding, this target system must always be available, and all VPN traffic is routed through this system.   It is more complex and can also be a bit difficult to set up.

  If you directly expose ARD ports to the Internet via port forwarding, you'll want to either restrict the available source IP ports (to reduce the magnitude of the attackers), and you'll want to be very careful about passwords on target systems.   Ports of the ARD are detected very fluent, and several people and botnets will attempt to access the system password-baited; trying to guess the users and passwords on the target system.   Once attackers have a login and a password, they will then try to spread throughout the rest of the network.  (It's part of why I prefer to use virtual private networks).

  Sierra of MacOS support PPTP VPN, so I wouldn't go with any configuration of VPN that you considered it.   I'd probably use L2TP/IPsec, because the customer is generally available in most of the other operating systems, Mac OS and iOS.

  There is information available on the network ports used by Apple devices.   If you enable VPN port forwarding, there are discussions on the ports and protocols required to according to VPN you use posted around the ' net and not all firewalls is particularly good to port-forwarding, the protocols and ports VPN. "  Low-end older firewalls and firewalls tend to have problems here.

  To locate on the networks of the target systems, you get to use dynamic DNS from client devices or other means to identify the public IP address that is associated with the target customer.   If customers are roaming on disparate networks and not simply roaming IP addresses on their private networks (these addresses can be fixed through DHCP configurations, too) and if you don't have access to intermediate firewalls, then you will probably have to rethink the entire approach, unfortunately.    Connection to mobile systems distance arbitrary is not especially it is possible, he must do something on the client that "tags" or "ad" its network metadata to your own server from tracking client or server monitoring of some other entity (for example messages to the DNS servers used by the dynamic DNS providers), or the management connection must be initiated from the client.    ARD does not support these mechanisms.   Discussions here can get pretty complex, too--in terms of network configuration, both in terms of security for the clients and servers.

  There are a few related discussions this general topic in the forums. See here, here, here, here or here.

• Server VPN Setup

  I have an old Mac Mini running 10.7.5 server and I'll try to get everything set up correctly, so I can use L2TP VPN and I tried the rest of this guide (https://macminicolo.net/lionservervpn) and I can connect when I'm on my internal network, but not over the Internet and I do not know (at least I hope) that it is something simple that I am wrong in my setup.

  • My internal home network use the IP range 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.200
  • All necessary ports are transmitted in both my router and firewall of the Mac
  • L2TP VPN Passthrough is enabled in my router
  • I installed for my Sophos antivirus, but I do not think that interferes with anything
  • I have the IP address range for the VPN to use as 192.168.2.100 - 192.168.2.105 (because this should be different that my network internal, right?)
  • If my NO - IP dynamic DNS host name is "xxxxxx.ddns.net" then what is the hostname must be set on in the server application, right?
  • When I try to connect to the VPN via Internet using my PC, I have be active in the newspaper and I have that at the bottom of the post

  If there is no information there that I do not forget to add, please let me know

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: connection.

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec phase 1 started (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine, 1 Main Mode message).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Answering machine, 2 main Mode message).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message in Main Mode 3).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Answering machine message in Main Mode 4).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKEv1 phase 1 AUTH: success. (Answering machine, Mode main Message 5).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message in Main Mode 5).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKEv1 phase 1 answering machine: success. (Answering machine, Main Mode).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Answering machine, Main Mode 6 message).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Information message).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKEv1-Information Notice: pass success. (- ISAKMP SECURITY ASSOCIATION).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec phase 1 established (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec Phase2 started (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message of Quick Mode 1).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Answering machine message of Quick Mode 2).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message from fast Mode 3).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKEv1 answering Phase2: success. (Answering machine, fast Mode).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec Phase2 established (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec Phase2 started (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message of Quick Mode 1).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Answering machine message of Quick Mode 2).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Answering machine message from fast Mode 3).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Information message).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IKEv1 answering Phase2: success. (Answering machine, fast Mode).

  Apr 6 23:19:18 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec Phase2 established (initiated by peers).

  Apr 6 23:19:21 servername raccoon [1240]: IPSec Phase2 started (initiated by peers).

  So, it turns out that it was a Windows problem, apparently I just need to make the adjustments detailed here (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202384) on my Windows PC and I was finally able to connect. I figured this out when I actually tried to connect to the VPN using my iPad and I saw that it connected without a problem, I just wanted to reply to my post wrap someone else has this problem and I hope that this post will help

• G7-2224nr HP: drivers unknown

  Good day my most skilled HP friends! I come back to you with a problem that I can not get a solution. In Device Manager, my 2224nr of the g7, has said that there are 2 missing drivers 'unknown device'. It does not indicate which devices they are. I found many of the same questions here and on Google. The answers always led to a link for the drivers of HP. However, I've tried almost all of them, nothing helps. Reluctantly, I downloaded a 'device locater' program He told me that the missing pilot was: "device Realtek audio-USB", using Microsoft 6.1.7600.167. But there is NO driver! Since then consult the HP site, the site of AMD and the: Realtek site, I got nowhere! All of my existing equipment works, and I don't know what a "USB audio device" is same. I'm under Win. 8.1 and it started after a drive re-installed at the factory. Someone at - it ideas? THANKS TO YOU ALL!

  tlight52

  You are the very welcome.

  This device has the HP wireless button Driver that I posted above.

• MacBook 08 R2 server connection problem.

  I have a MacBook with OS X 10.6.8 I need to connect to a VPN running Server 2008 R2 by using L2TP IPSEC. All credentials and all the settings are in place, but my server still does not work.

  Hello
   
  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. Appropriate in the TechNet forums. Please post your question in the TechNet forums.
   
  You can follow the link to your question:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

• Shadow on my monitor

  I have a HP f1905 19 inch LCD monitor connected to a m7330n desktop computer...
  My operating system is Windows XP Home Edition.

  I use a graphics Geforce 7600 GS PCI.

  I have a problem with my cursor disappears on the right side of my screen. It stops at the top, low and limits on the left of the screen, but it seems to continue to travel in some fantasy land on the right side. It's like the virtual screen is two times wider than what is displayed on the screen.

  The screenshot below shows what I'm trying to explain. It shows a normal screen to the left and a large yellow area in which the cursor disappears.

  http://www.Flickr.com/photos/9784019@N05/3227370194/

  If anyone can help with this, I would appreciate it, of course.

  Finally found the culprit. This isn't in the control panel Nvidia g-force tab of properties when you right click on the desktop. I put it to unique view and the problem disappeared. Weird that it must use the dual display.

• Extend the L2 VLAN multi-site WAN

  Hello

  I have several sites connected over a MPLS network provider, everything works as expected, have full connectivity L3 in all these sites.

  I now need to establish layer 2 connectivity (VLAN) on the 21 sites. Ideally, I would intend to attach additional routers behind routers of THIS (don't have no access to these suppliers or PEs, but provider may re - configure BGP on the CE peer with our device) and use a port on these routers as port Lan Layer 2, but do not know which technology to use

  1. L2TPv3 comes to mind, but can L2TPv3 works in a multipoint configuration? Can I have a site as a hub and others like rays and talk through the hub? Traditional using L2TPV3 config, how do I use multiple Xconnects for the same VLAN on the same interface?
  2. Worse, I can run on (also our new routers VPLS PEs) MPLS VPLS, but seems like overkill.

  What you guys say is the most simple/more elegant solution for this puzzle?

  L2TPv3 does not support multitouch.  It can perform point to point.

  VPLS does support multitouch, but you need much more expensive kit to do.

  I have just a brainwave!  You only use the IP protocol for this network of layer 2?  If so, use LISP.  It works on the same lower end kit of Cisco.  I would like to convert your entire network to him.

  In particular, you must activate the LISP mobility.

  General information of LISP:

  http://Lisp.Cisco.com/

  An example of an extension of the continuous complex layer 2 using LISP with full redundancy.  You don't want something this complex, but it shows what you want to do, and the massive power that LISP has.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DCI/5-0/LISPmobility/DCI_LISP_Host_Mobility/LISPmobile_4.html

• Types of Vpn"

  Hi all

  It is a matter totally newbie but here's...

  It is written in some places, the L2TP, PPTP and GRE are types of vpn tunnels, if for example you can create a dialer L2TP and (after authentication), it will form a tunnel L2TP, which you can wrap in a GRE tunnel

  first of all, what is the need for this? Because L2TP allows to transfer any layer 3 Protocol. you need top GRE?

  the other thing is, in some texts, there are explanations on the configuration a L2TP on the LAKE and the LNS and of course as a dialer to the client end. no free WILL. so... what exactly? is it a tunnel? What is a dialer? is it two? What are the differences, and when I would prefer one over the other?

  Ipsec, isakamp, encryption, mapping all phases are well understood. My confusion is these types different tunnel/dialer.

  Thanks in advance,

  Willow

  Dear friends,

  Let me join you.

  (1) what is the difference between L2TP and GRE? they need IPSec and are has a few tunnels, while L2TP is also a dialer via PPP/PPPoe to connect to the ISP.

  L2TP is used to encapsulate and tunnel set Layer2 frameworks (e.g. Ethernet, HDLC, PPP, Frame Relay, or ATM) including their payload. GRE is used to encapsulate and tunnel Layer 3 packets (such as IPv4 or IPv6). There are other significant differences between free WILL and L2TP, but at this stage, I consider it the most important distinction between them. In other words, if you consider a tunnel to a pipe, and then with L2TP, you would be feeding Layer2 frames in this pipe and with free WILL, you could feed Layer 3 packets in this pipe. The choice of L2TP or free WILL depends on the application - whether you need tunnel frames together because they are sent by the source, or if you just need packages of origin without their tunnel link layer encapsulation.

  In fact, there is an exception to the above rules that may make things more confusing. You can also tunnel Layer2 executives through tunnels GRE as well. The trick is to know what kind of frame you syringe in a GRE packet. If you look more closely the format of the header 4 bytes to the base address WILL, the first 2 bytes specify version GRE and indicators and the 2 following bytes have the same meaning as the EtherType Ethernet field: they identify the type of payload of the GRE packet. If there is a valid EtherType value recorded for the frame you want to carry through a GRE tunnel, then by all means, you can create a tunnel it. If there is no registered EtherType value then you are in trouble because you can't invent a value and put it there - maybe receiver endpoint do not understand the value, or it can it be confused with another protocol and process encapsulated incorrectly frame. All the common Layer 3 protocols have their EtherType recorded because they are intended to be carried in Ethernet frames, so with Layer 3 packets, we generally have no problem. However, not all the Layer2 protocols have their EtherTypes because tunneling frames within other frames is not a common practice. This is why the nature of the ACCORD as a Layer 3 mainly tunneling protocol.

  Just for your convenience, you can find the list of EtherType values to

  http://standards-Oui.IEEE.org/EtherType/ETH.txt

  L2TP or IPsec need se GRE. The two protocols of defintion will happily run without IPsec, but then, of course, they will carry all data encrypted and unprotected. IPsec is an add-on to the two protocols to ensure data transmission security (authentication, confidentiality, integrity, protection against replay attacks).

  By saying "L2TP is also a dialer via PPP/PPPoE to connect to the ISP" you want to say probably virtual-PPP interface - am I wrong? Can you clarify this more in detail?

  (2) what is the Protocol-point difference charged and tunnel point-to-point protocol? since they both are supported on non - IP traffic

  PPP is a protocol of Layer2 and is intended to be run directly through the physical network interfaces. It is not a tunneling protocol, it is rather a protocol binding to data originally created to be used on interfaces series of computers and routers. He replaced or complete other binding protocols series such as SLIP or HDLC. Regarding the installation of the OSI model, PPP is on the same layer that Ethernet - both run through the physical network interfaces and define how two directly connected network interfaces to send messages between them.

  PPTP is a tunneling protocol that uses a modification of the GRE protocol and Protocol additional signs to tunnel PPP frames in IP packets on a routed network. It's the confusing thing, PPTP: she uses GRE to tunnel PPP frames and only PPP frames. You can't see other types of PPTP traffic directly - it was not designed to function this way even if the Agreement itself would be able to do this. Instead, what you want to carry on a PPTP tunnel must first be put in PPP frames, and they will get so encapsulated WILL and sent on the tunnel on the other side.

  The fact that the PPP is used inside PPTP does not imply that the PPP was invented with PPTP in mind. It actually has the opposite - PPP existed well before PPTP and creators of felt PPTP that it would be beneficial to use because it provides some features neat it otherwise would re-implement (authentication, superior negotiation of the Protocol, the IP autoconfiguration to name a few). The fact that the PPP is used inside PPTP does not have PPP, only a tunneling protocol; PPP is rather just a "victim" of PPTP.

  PPTP is not a data link layer protocol, it is not directly used on any type of physical interface, on the contrary: PPTP expects connectivity IP base (using any type of data link layer and physical) between endpoints is already in place.

  (3) what about standalone (no GRE) PPTP? why they want PPTP running inside a GRE? How to get it? also, why can I not use PPTP with GRE and ipsec for security, or simply of PPTP with ipsec?  Why should I use L2TP? What is its benefits?

  PPTP consists internally of a somewhat modified GRE more additional control running on TCP channel which provides the installation of the tunnel and disassembly session. There is no such thing as a standalone without GRE PPTP: PPTP is Grateful, even if not a vanilla ACCORD, rather an adapted version of it.

  On the combination of PPTP and IPsec - technically, there nothing that would prevent you from protecting a PPTP with IPsec tunnel. It's just a unicast IP traffic and all this kind of traffic between two fixed end points can be protected by IPsec. If this combination is not available on a particular device or operating system, it is simply because this combination was never sufficiently strongly requested by customers to be implemented by providers.

  L2TP has the advantage of being richer, more widely supported and actively developed, but it was really designed to be used in environments of provider where hundreds or thousands of individual subscribers and their traffic are by tunnel between an access concentrator and a network server. These features are not used if the L2TP is terminated in a single user PC or router home. Of course, it has nothing bad about it, there just the L2TP is an excessive for such a small scale deployment. Yet, as it turns out, PPTP is considered to be more be simply outdated and not developed or maintained and L2TP is universally suggested as one of the possible replacements.

  (4) who is the dialer in GRE + IPSEC tunnel (or free WILL independent tunnel?) this Protocol is used? which layer 2 is used to make the connection?

  I'm not quite sure what you mean by the "dialer". With Volition, encapsulation is

  IP tunnel header. GRE header | Package originating IP

  This whole package is an IP packet, and is simply routed over the network to the tunnel endpoint, décapsulés-L2 and L2 encapsulated at each router according to the normal rules.

  (5) when you say GRE protocol 47 and ipsec uses the protocol 50 or 51 (esp / ah)-how the two, they meet? How to watch an encapsulation with these two protocols? What is used at each layer?

  Depending on whether IPsec is used in transport or tunnel mode, a GRE packet protected by IPsec looks like this:

  Tunnel mode:
  Intellectual property for the IPsec tunnel header. ESP / AH | GRE tunnel IP header | GRE header | Package originating IP

  Mode of transport:
  GRE tunnel IP header | ESP / AH | GRE header | Package originating IP

  With IPsec protection, the outer header (on the left shown) will always use the value of protocol 50/51. The value of Protocol 47 is engaged in the header of GRE IP tunnel (tunnel mode) or is moved to the ESP header's next header field / AH (mode of transport).

  (6) that LNS actually means "a L2TP server just insdie a router?

  LNS means L2TP Network Server and it peut - but does not need to-say that this feature is implemented in a network router. LNS is a software service, and it can be done either in the operating system (and perhaps partially in hardware) of a router, or it can be run on a server. There are implementations of the feature of LNS for Linux servers, for example.

  The terminology of the LAKE (L2TP Access Concentrator) and LNS (L2TP Network Server) is given by the RFCS that specify the use of L2TP. These RFCs do not oblige how or where these two elements are implemented. Any device that performs the tasks of LAKE or LNS is called a LAKE or a LNS, and either a dedicated router or even a PC or a raspberry Pi is not serious to L2TP.

  (7) if I come with a GRE tunnel and ipsec, I still need to use L2TP as dial-up at the end of the customer, I don't?

  Certainly not - the GRE tunnels create IP packages, and these IP packets will be routed to the other end of the tunnel through existing IP connectivity. Until you can have a GRE tunnel between two end points, you must have a connectivity IP to work between them (this is the same as for PPTP; after all, PPTP is based on the GRE). There is no need to use L2TP here. Even if encapsulate you the GRE in IPsec, you still get an IP packet that you can send to the other end of the tunnel, as there is already usable IP connectivity.

  Welcome to ask for more!

  Best regards
  Peter