Utm9s double vpn double wan

Similar Questions

• RV042 v3 & RV082 v3: WAN Failover + restore VPN

  We have a v3 RV082 and RV042 v3 with latest firmware.

  They have all two Dual WAN (backup active Smartlink).

  They connect with each other via the VPN (with VPN enabled and configured backup Tunnel).

  When primary internet (WAN1) fails, and it switches to the internet backup (WAN2),

  We have to manually replace the VPN of WAN1 WAN2 interface to restore

  the VPN tunnel.

  We tried to create a second instance of VPN using WAN2, however it will not save

  due to a conflict of network with VPN original (even if we move the destination VPN

  IP and VPN backup tunnel IP).  I imagine that the conflict is the destination network.

  How do we automate the VPN interface change an outage of the internet?

  Or about what work can be done to ensure the VPN is restored after a

  failover of the Internet (WAN interface change).

  To address scenarios, you need the two operating sites in the double-wan load-balancing mode. The main tunnel is formed with two interfaces WAN1 and the backup tunnel is formed with two interfaces to WAN2.

• Domain policy by default in all of reception through Site to SIte VPN WAN

  We have a field of forrest with subdomains under it.  We have three subdomains.  All are different places and each site connects to the other with a VPN over WAN.  We have a WSUS server that is on the field T.  We have customers on all three areas, field T, S domain and domain CR.   All three areas can consult and get updates from the WSUS server in the T field.

  The problem is if the computer has been configured to the area S originally, and now the same computer and the user are field t, S domain computer can't get the default domain policy that it redirects to the WSUS server to domain T.

  We have about 15 computers that have the same problem.

  How can I do for this troubleshooting.  Why would he not the domain policy by default when the user connects.  When you perform a gpresult is always the local policy.  Never the default domain policy.

  You will find appropriate in the specific WSUS forum support: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverwsus/threads

• Slow flow on MPLS VPN WAN

  Anyone have any ideas why a portion of the traffic is slow as it passes through a VPN MPLS WAN. My FTP copies are fast but copy all windows or windows file transfers are slow. Copies of windows are about three times slower as the FTP transfers. Can be optimized on routers or switches?

  Hello

  Thus, all transfers are done with CIFS are slow and other then CIFS are ok?

  All transfers are between XP/7 and servers (before 2008)?

  Please take a look at http://bit.ly/rkh9IM

  CIFS (or SMB) prior to the 2008 version is slow by definition as it can not cope with very good latency. Other protocols such as HTTP and FTP run much smoother.

  When you run Server 2008 (or better) combination with Windows Vista (or better) should solve some of your problems as it can using SMBv2.

  What actual speed is your order on the MPLS and what is the maximum transfer reached between server and workstation?

  Best regards, G.

• Helps with the rv180w and the Shrew soft vpn

  Hi, I'm trying to establish a vpn connection by using soft shrew for the cisco rv180w router.

  I watch and read everything I could find, but the connection drops during the opening of the tunnel.

  There were a few tuttorial here in the forum, but the links are down.

  I want Edifier is to establish communication and to be able to access my domain on the network.

  Any help with the settings would be greatly apeciated. I am new to vpn.

  Thanks in advance.

  Federico,

  Try to access the following link. It has good instructions for a similar model. The main difference is that the SA500 has double-WAN and the RV180W does not work.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-9378#comment-7216

  Here's another tutorial for the RVS4000 that can help:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-18443

  Check out the last post in the following thread, which received instructions for the RV220W (should be exactly the same as RV180W)

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/4165652#4165652

  -Marty

• ISA550W: WAN redundancy is in charge of the session affinity?

  Hi, we are using the ISA550W WAN failover mode.

  I wonder if we switch to weighted, double-WAN mode is the session affinity is respected? In other words, if we have a PC on the internal network by using an external website, all the following connections will use the same WAN interface, or will be they possible be changing back and forth between WAN different interfaces depending on the load?

  I see no mention of this in the docs, so I am assuming that it is not supported.

  Thank you

  Neil

  Double-WAN mode weighted, a connection from a PC should continue using the same connection WAN for the destination of the original session was created for.  However, if the PC opens another session (i.e. a connection to another site), then this session should use the best connection, which could mean that he uses the WAN2.

  Shawn Eftink
  CCNA/CCDA

  Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

• Setup WAN RV042

  Hi all

  We have two Internet service providers. It assigns the IP address if DHCP. The others we gave a pool of static IP addresses, but address WAN IP is on a different segment than the default gateway of the WAN as in the following example:

  WAN IP: 192.168.10.110

  Mask: 255.255.255.248

  RE default gateway: 192.168.20.1

  Default gateway all double WAN routers we've tested allow not the IP address of the WAN on a different segment than the SOHO WAN. My question is: the Cisco RV042 allows the IP address of the WAN on a different segment than the default gateway of the WAN?

  Thank you all.

  Yes, theres no big thing we can do programming routers will not have networks mix matched in the address.  When a provider does this, they are kind of transmission by proxy their gateway address to protect themselves.  In all reality, you have a gateway address in your network, they are simply not provide to you.

• RV016 - Dual WAN & Secure connection problem

  I have settings wrong my RV016 upward to allow connections secured on our server. I have searched the forums and read a lot of posts and it seems that the protocol binding is the answer, but I can't make it work.

  We have a static double-WAN with 5 IPs configuration on our slow connection (a cable modem, 1 WAN) and a dynamic IP address on our fast (FIOS, 2 WAN). I use special NAT to send all incoming traffic on a static (on WAN 1) to static IP internal IP of our server. We use intelligent load balancing and (by a message I read) I turned off the detection of Network Service on the two networks.

  When I try to SSH from outside the server, I get through: I get a password and, if I get the wrong password I'm re - you are prompted for the password. But when I enter the password of the connection hangs. When I unplug WAN 2 I can connect on SSH without problem.

  I tried implementing binding protocol as follows: I created a service for SSH (TCP/22 ~ 22) and added to WAN 1. I remembered to turn it on. I played with a different IP address ranges, but nothing works (it is where I am a little out of my League). Here is what I tried:

  • Internal IP of the server at all: 10.10.10.10 ~ 10.10.10.10(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)
  • internal subnet at all: 10.10.10.2 ~ 10.10.10.254(0.0.0.0~0.0.0.0)

  In a lot of posts I read that binding protocol has solved bad people to a connection secure. What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Alex

  Hi Alex, I think one thing that you should really consider is the DMZ to see if it localized to a problem of double-WAN or not. If the problem follows with two WAN upward in the DMZ, I agree there is something which perhaps does not properly.

  Another argument may be, if you are the type of thinking somehow that load balancing is messing things up, link ALL SERVICE for the server to a specific WAN, don't let not limited just a port. That can also give an idea, especially if the server works as expected.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Using Cisco IOS Firewall VPN clinet

  Hello

  I configured RTR1 to support VPN Clients. RTR1 has a site 2 RTR 2 site VPN tunnel.

  Customer VPN connected to RTR1 have RTR1 LAN IP connectivity. How can I get the VPN Client LAN to access the local network RTR2?

  I've included the VPN Client LAN to be ecrypted in the VPN tunnel to the LAN RTR2 and Vice Versa. I also tried a static router configured on RTR2 for the LAN of Client VPN IP WAN RTR1 serving of next hop.

  Still doesn't work is not for me. Any ideas?

  Thank you

  The other side added your remote VPN client pool to its configuration? The remote site must know its interesting traffic as well. Is RTR2 NAT'ing? Cleaned the configs for the two routers would help a lot.

• 7100 as a vpn concentrator

  Hello

  a cisco 7120/7140 is usable in the way a vpn3000 is? I want to say, use two fast-Ethernet networks to bypass the firewall while closing the vpn?

  or it only does end vpn on wan ports that you install on them?

  something like:

  (internet)-| - firewall-|-(intranet)

  | |

  |---7120---|.

  Kind regards

  Carlos.

  We are trying to do the same thing on our network, but I prefer not to interrupt service for my users. Right now they authenticate to the 3000 with the preshared key, and then he was invited by our DC area username and password. The 7100 configure a pre-shared key and now I'm kind of torn between making my users validate to GBA before the DC, or go directly to our domain controller for authentication. I know that my boss will want to any interruption of service. If you have any sugestions or tips you've learned to make migration more, let me know. And by the way, we will place fe 0/0 outside the pix and fe 0/1 inside out of a dmz interface for more control and firewall protection.

  Thank you

• Cannot access the VPN server located behind the corporate firewall.

  The VPN server was created by myself, in my Department. I can access the server from anywhere when I am in my business network. When I'm at home, I can't even ping the VPN server WAN interface. When I try to connect via the cisco VPN client, I get the message ' reason 412: peer remote not responding. "

  The main my company firewall blocks external traffic?

  Should I change anything in the VPN server?

  I heard about port forwarding, but have no knowledge about this. Port forwarding is done on the VPN server or the main firewall?

  Also should I go and ask the company system administrator to enable certain ports for the public IP address that I use for my server?

  I hope you can help

  Concerning

  Yes, quite correct. Please open ESP protocol UDP/500 and UDP/4500 for IPSec VPN.

• RV220W v RV320 (best router to buy? Duplicate port?)

  Hey Cisco-ers,

  Planning on buying a new business Router Firewall VPN in the next 24 hours and have a few questions that I would be grateful if someone could respond.

  1. I guess the most recent series of Cisco SMB router is the RV series with the rest having been that would be end of life?

  2. the more feature-rich and more powerful are the RV220W and the RV320?

  3. in addition to the integrated WiFi AP into the RV220W and the dual WAN in the RV320 there are all the other differences? More features in one over the other? I see that the RV320 might have a higher flow rate?

  4. the RV220W does not support port mirroring / SPAN only packet capture 1 MB of traffic (which, by today's standards, is not enough to get a specific look at the incoming/outgoing connections) but the RV320 not?

  5 port mirroring is a big problem for me (to identify on my network bandwidth hungry devices!) so is it possible that put as a feature request for the RV220W? or is there a technical limitation? Is the physical material within a not as good RV220V?

  Otherwise unless someone says something different it looks like the RV320 is the best router (rich in features and performance) you make less than £500? Please correct me if not.

  Thanks for your time.

  Hi Matthew,

  OK, here go us:

  1. I guess the most recent series of Cisco SMB router is the RV series with the rest having been that would be end of life? I don't put any RV series for pasture (EoL) recently.

  2. the more feature-rich and more powerful are the RV220W and the RV320? The RV320 and the RV325 were recently launched. The RV220W has been on the market for some time - so it is natural that the newer models have more features. We take our experiences and suggestions from you all and incorporate them into future models.

  3. in addition to the integrated WiFi AP into the RV220W and the dual WAN in the RV320 there are all the other differences? More features in one over the other? I see that the RV320 might have a higher flow rate? The RV320 and the RV325 have SSL VPN, USB broadband with failover, double WAN, etc. They are better suited for a several device deployment vs. an all-in-one/network in a box...

  4. the RV220W does not support port mirroring / SPAN only packet capture 1 MB of traffic (which, by today's standards, is not enough to get a specific look at the incoming/outgoing connections) but the RV320 not? Back to the above statement. -We work effectively on the next gen RV220W - which will include 802.11 AC.

  5 port mirroring is a big problem for me (to identify on my network bandwidth hungry devices!) so is it possible that put as a feature request for the RV220W? or is there a technical limitation?  Is the physical material within a not as good RV220V? We would prob not right at the request of feature on this particular model of Michael.

  Thank you for being a member of this community.

  Marc

• Option not available in Configuration Professional v2 performance routing

  I get a router Cisco 2901 put in place and tries to load balancing/link aggregation and/or failover for my double WAN connections. Being new Cisco's IOS software, I'd rather do my setup using the specialist graphic Configuration interface.  If I understand correctly, the option of routing Performance will help me set up but I don't have this option, available in professional Configuration; any ideas? I downloaded the latest version of CP (version 2) I think; I've been reviewing on the article often referenced on this feature to: Cisco Routing of Performance and reviewed the Cisco Feature Navigator available on http://www.cisco.com/go/cfn for my release IOS; the feature I'm looking for is documented in a flash to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_configuration_professional/scrcst/PfR/CCPPFR.swf (screenshot below) presentation:

  

  A summary of key results of the command show version 'IOS' on this router are:

  Cisco IOS software, software C2900 (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Last update Wed, 30-Sep-09 05:30 by prod_rel_team

  ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0 M1 (1r), VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc1) BPRouter availability is 5 days, 23 hours, 43 minutes system returned to ROM by system restarted at 11:34:47 PCTime Wed Dec 23 2009 system image file is "flash0:c2900-universalk9-mz.» Spa. 150 - 1.M.bin.

  Cisco CISCO2901/K9 (revision 1.0) with 483328 K/K 40960 bytes of memory.

  Card processor ID FTX134981A3

  2 FastEthernet interfaces

  2 gigabit Ethernet interfaces

  1 module of virtual private network (VPN)

  Configuration of DRAM is wide with parity 64-bit capable.

  255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.

  254464K bytes of system CompactFlash ATA 0 (read/write)

  License info:

  License IDU:

  -------------------------------------------------

  Device SN # PID

  -------------------------------------------------

  * 0 FTX134981A3 CISCO2901/K9

  Technology for the Module package license information: "c2900.

  ----------------------------------------------------------------

  Technology-technology-current package Type next reboot technology

  -----------------------------------------------------------------

  IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent

  Security securityk9 Permanent securityk9 data uc no no no register None None None Configuration is 0 x 2102

  Thank you for your question.  This community is for Cisco Small Business products, and your question is referring to a product Cisco Elite/Classic.  Please post your question in the Cisco NetPro forums located here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro?view=overview this forum is subject to the subject matter experts on Cisco Elite/Classic products that may be able to answer your question.

  Kind regards

  Cindy Toy

  Cisco Small Business Support Community Manager

• Installation of two - route

  I live in a rural area and have the two satellite internet and cellular (mobile broadband) internet, because none are reliable. I connect to technology mobile broadband with a PCMCIA card that is inserted into a Linksys WRT54G Router. Until very recently, I plugged on satellite via a separate router, which meant that I had to switch routers to switch services and one of the two services could use both.

  I just bought a router Linksys RV042 double-Wan, hoping to run them simultaneously by satellite and cell phone through the same router and use load balancing. I have the RV042 defined as the router DHCP. DHCP is disabled on the 54G. I changed the IP address of the default 54G to 192.168.1.145, in the sector of the RV042 customer. I connect a LAN on the WRT54G port to a port on the RV042 WAN. No go. The RV042 does not see the 54G. He treats the LAN connection as active, but does not have an IP address.

  How can I get the RV042 the 54G, as he would a modem? Any ideas?

  It's a bit complicated, so I have it divided into stages.

  IP address settings:

  (1) the value of the port LAN WRT54G 192.168.2.1

  (2) set the RV042 LAN port on 192.168.1.1 [default]

  (3) RV042 WAN1 and WAN2 for obtain an IP automatically

  (4) WRT54G LAN Server DHCP active.

  (5) WRT54G gateway (no RIP) mode

  (6) set RV042 for BACKUP or load balancing mode as you wish

  (7) fill RV042 configuration of DHCP - DNS Server - with 192.168.1.1 or the address of an Open DNS server that is accessible from both of your ISP.

  Connections:

  (1) WRT54 LAN to RV042 WAN2

  (2) RV042 WAN1 to satellite Internet

  (3) PC and any other printer, etc., next to RV042 LAN game consoles.

  Results:

  (1) WRT54G should now be accessible [of LAN] to 192.168.2.1

  2) two providers of Internet services must be accessible without the need to reconfigure the hardware or the LAN IP settings

  (3) RV042 is accessible [LAN] at 192.168.1.1

  (4) all connected to the WRT54G wireless LAN devices will not be able to access the Internet by satellite.

  What is the kind of Setup you had in mind?

• Errors of certificate RV042 browser by connecting to the web-based GUI

  I put the RV042 for QuickVPN access.  The router config recommend turning on HTTPS in the firewall when using QuickVPN.  The side effect of this is any web browser get me certificate errors and warns me not not to continue to connect to the router config.  How can I fix this so the browser does not throw these messages?

  Router Linksys brand is using the latest firmware for this material (1.3.13.02 - tm)

  Hi Tim,.

  The deeper issue, it's because of the certification on the cisco.com area which you do not own. And when you connect to your router probably with your own domain name or ip address that it compares this information with the information stored in the certificate. Because it will never match across is a mistake. The RV0xx series routers are not able to install 3rd party certificates, then it will not be able to resolve in their current version. I'm not aware of any decision to modify the code to solve this problem. The RV220W and SA500 series routers have the ability to install a third-party certificate. The SA is the only other model that has the ability in the line of small business to double WAN.

  Cisco Small Business Support Center

  Randy Manthey

  CCNA, CCNA - security