Validation in multiple hierarchies, both

Similar Questions

• Report unique unique dimension for multiple hierarchies

  I am trying to add multiple hierarchies in a single dimension in a single report. To create the hierarchy in BI admin, I followed the instructions found here

  Oracle BI EE 10.1.3.3/2 & amp; #8211; A Dimension & amp; #8211; Several hierarchies & amp; laquo; Business Intelligence & am...

  and here

  https://forums.Oracle.com/thread/2440305

  My Patient hierarchy looks like in this

  All Patients-> gender-> ID Patient

  All Patients-> age-> ID Patient group

  When I drag and drop the second hierarchy in Oracle BI answers said criteria the following "...". "you can add as a hierarchy by dimension to a report. I guess what I'm trying to do is not possible!  :-)

  Q1: Is this feature indeed not taken in charge or I do something wrong?

  Q2: If it is can not supported someone explain why?

  Version Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.6.0

  (a) reports different levels of 2 hierarchies is not supported. As explained below, you cannot use OLAP to get the values of aggregation across levels of hierarchies: H1 and H2.

  However, if you wish, you can report it to the lowest level, Patient, common to these two hierarchies and show the age group as well as the attributes of sex corresponding to each patient. This becomes reports Patient / the lowest level. You can of course use the features of the reporting as obiee tool to use a Pivot object (for example) and exclude the Patient as Id columns, name, etc. and get obiee to perform syntheses located in the reporting layer and get recaps of interests. OBIEE Pivot measures allowing aggregation using the Min, Max, Sum, Count, etc running sum. OLAP facilitates this solution, but does not particularly help in aggregation (given that the aggregation is now made in obiee and not according to the rules of definition of aw olap cube). It acts as a source of information at the lowest level stored in the cube. Would result in a degradation of performance, but it can be acceptable/managed according to volumes/data report.

  NOTE: For/Pour / solution solution workaround, use the common areas, nonhierarchical columns, of the OBIEE presentation layer.

  (b) not supported: OLAP Cubes contain summaries pre-calculees (or calculated dynamically) at different levels of each hierarchy. This contributes to faster performance reports. 2 hierarchies to the succession of defeats same time allowing objective feature. A cross-combination of levels across different hierarchies requires a dynamic recalculation of the detail records to get the right values for, say, age group: 30-39 and sex: male. Summaries of H1 at the level of the age for the age group: 30-39 cover all genres and can decompose in male/female w/o of recalculation. Similarly H2 summarized level sex sex: male covers all age groups. This fragmentation is not possible except through workaround / solution explained in (a).

  Hope that helps.

• How to create multiple hierarchies from the same physical table

  Hi all
  
  I have a physical table to join with a fact table: there are 3 different hierarchies, which share the last 2 levels inside the dimension table. It's the logic diagram of hierarchies:
  
  Dimension services
  -Business
  -Sector
  -Type
  -Operator
  -Product
  Partner of dimension
  -Partner
  -Operator
  -Product
  Contractor of dimension
  -Contractor
  -Operator
  -Product
  
  All columns are in the same table physical source. I tried to create 3 table logic source from the same physical table, everyone with all the columns and create a hierarchy for each dimension table, but it gives me nQSError: 15011.
  
  Any suggestion? Maybe the physical table alias can help for the creation of tables of different sizes?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Concerning

  Hello

  It is a basic rule that you cannot create multiple hierarchies in a single dimension table, so what you do is create three tables of alias and slip into MDB layer in 3 different sizes and on top these tables create 3 different dimension hierarchies.

  Check if useful/correct

  Thank you.

• validation on multiple fields

  Created a form on a table. Table 1 a div, lname, fname columns: id (non-null)
  
  Need a validation: If all 3 fields are empty (fname, lname, div) so that it does not accept the entry of the form.
  
  How to make a posting on multiple fields in apex? I can write a function like
  
  If (: fname is null and: lname is null and: div is null) then return True else return False.
  
  But how do you put it in the condition under the process in the Apex section? It means, basically, if all 3 fields are null then do not run line of the table1 process when the user click on create button.
  
  Can someone give me some advice? Thanks in advance.
  
  Tai

  Tai,

  You can create page apex level validation where you can do what you have specified.

  In the definition of the Page, click on + sing against 'Validation', Slelect "Validation of levels Page" and THEN click, select "PL/SQL" click Next and select here "function that returns a Boolean" put your code.

  Return the FALSE value - if the validation fails

  See you soon
  Hari

• Multiple hierarchies with shared members

  Hello
  
  is it just a common practice to have single parents for hierarchies that are built on the same size of Essbase, or it is a restriction of system-level?
  Only in Hyperion Planning, or this is true also on Essbase level?
  
  Is it true that only the terminal nodes can be shared members?
  
  (automatic shared members are created on levels higher for parents with 1 child, then why the other shared not allowed?)
  
  Thank you for your answer!

  I'm not sure I follow your question completely, but for running sums of shared member, the lowest level of the rollup shared can be one zero level or upper limb or from another dimension. The condition is that a shared member can not have descendants in the shared rollup, it would be the level low.
  For example if I have the cumulative following primer

  Geography
  East
  NJ
  NY
  PA
  West
  It
  OR
  WA

  I have a cumulative alternamte as

  Total of Bob
  NY (shared)
  West (shared)

  You see thar NY is a level zero member and the West is a member of level 1, but under the cumulative replacement are both level zero members

• Validations with multiple form provisions on a JSF page

  Hello Experts

  I have a page where I have several sections, each with a PanelFormLayout and a button "submit". My requirement is that when I click on the "submit" button, only this form must be validated. But in my case, the required fields in the other sections are being validated that I don't want.

  Is it possible to achieve it? Please suggest.

  What is available including all forms? High school-forms allows to ignore validation on other forms.

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/ADF/learnmore/40-PPR-subform-169182.PDF

• Validation between TWO hierarchies; Help, please

  Hi all

  I build validations and I'm having a problem with a piece of syntax.

  Business need:

  Make sure that all members, preceded CCC that exist in the hierarchy1 also exist in the hierarchy2.

  All members of the project are created in hierarchy1. We also have another hierarchy called hierarchy2, in which we that allow to control the attribute "therapeutic Zone".  This attribute is inherited to level "CCC".  So, once we create members of the CCC-xxxxx-xxxxx in the hierarchy1, INSERT us this member in its respective place in the hierachy2 to assume its therapeutic area.

  It is relatively simple.  Now, sometimes users don't always do the step #2 (insert in hierachy2), so I build a validation to check if all members of the CCC in the hierarchy1 exist in the hierarchy2, as described above.

  My syntax is for a class: Validation of the formula: (Validation is attributed to hierachy1)

  NodeInHier (Equals (String, SubString (Abbrev (), 1, 3), CCC), hierarchy2)

  This valid and works successfully, but his shot all the members, instead of the members of the CCC JUST.

  Is there a piece of syntax, I'm missing here?

  Thank you.

  To apply only to those who start with CCC, you could do "If (Equals (String, SubString (Abbrev (), 1, 3), CCC), NodeInHier (Abbrev (), hierarchy2), True).  This way the validation will pass for anything that does not begin with the CCC and will look in hierarchy2 for those that do.

• Creative cloud validation on multiple devices?

  I try to install the software on my laptop under my creative cloud subscription, but it only offers me a trial for these programs. Is it because I have already installed it on my desktop?

  You are allowed to facilities on both machines.  Try to connect and come back to the laptop.

  Sign out, sign in | Creative office cloud app

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/creative-cloud/KB/sign-in-out-creative-cloud-desktop-app.html

• Validation for multiple buttons

  Hello
  
  A form that a validation should be done after pressing the button record OR create. In the menu dropdown I choose only one. Is there a way to get there without creating 2 validations (or 2 pages)?
  
  Thanks, fried
  
  Published by: fried Sep 20, 2010 05:04

  Hello

  In this scenarios do not use the key when condition.
  Use either APPLICATION IS CONTAINED in EXPRESSION1 with

  CREATE,SAVE
  

  in the expression 1
  or PL/SQL Expression with

  :REQUEST IN ('CREATE','SAVE')
  

  in the Expression 1.

  Kind regards

• Multiple hierarchies for a single dimension

  Hello
  
  I'm building a repository with OBIEE administration tool. the data source is a data warehouse of 10g Oracle created with OWB.
  There is a geographical dimension with 4 different hierarchies and I want to create the same hierarchies in my repository.is it is possible with OBIEE?
  NB: 4 hierarchies share some logical columns.
  
  Thank you

  Hello...

  You are looking for this
  Just try... He

  Thank you & best regards
  Kishore Guggilla

• validation against multiple records (section multiple registration)

  How can I validate the records in a record Multiple point (3 files) against multiple records in a database? In other words, if they have previously registered (and is committed to the database) 'A', 'B' and 'C' and then try to enter "C", "D" and "E", a trigger failure will occur because 'C' is recognized as being already in the database. I'm already having control of duplicate records of subject "during a session" via the form, but does not prevent a user to re - enter and update a different record with the same value as one of the other documents submitted previously. Does make sense? I guess I could control it at the database level, making the the user_id AND primary keys of point value, but I want to control it until the user selects the button "Update".
  
  This should check the records that are unique to that user only. Does make sense?

  Mark,
  You have a post request (PQ) trigger adding or modifying data when a record is being questioned? The when-validate-Item trigger (WVI) will run only when the State of the item is NEW or CHANGED. When you fill out your form with EXECUTE_QUERY(), the ITEM_STATUS should be query.

  If you use a trigger of PQ, would be to reset the record and status of the article once you set your value in the trigger of PQ. For example:

     SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('MY_BLOCK.MY_ITEM', ITEM_IS_VALID, PROPERTY_TRUE);
  

  Another option would be to set the status of all return to the QUERY.

    SET_RECORD_PROPERTY(:SYSTEM.trigger_record, STATUS, QUERY_STATUS);
  

  I hope this helps.
  Craig...

• max_threads 12 and run multiple calc both by maxl

  Hello

  "Will be important to aid in database Sample.Basic max_threads 12 ... "works in 11.1.2.1?

  
  

  If Yes please provide the syntax

  
  

  I tried below syn and got the error msg.
  

  
  

  import the database 'ap'.' DB' from data max_threads 12 Server text data_file "load" on the write error in "load.log";

  
  

  And

  
  

  How to make 5 calculation are simultaneously leaving maxl?

  I wrote a script that executed one after the other

  run the calculation 'ap'.' db'.' A ';

  run the calculation 'ap'.' DB'. ' two;

  Kind regards.

  using son max was introduced in 11.1.2.2 I don't think it'll work for 11.1.2.1

  If you write the maxl as bat and then try to use the startup

  Start startmaxl.cmd one.msh

  Start startmaxl.cmd two.msh

  Concerning

  Celvin

  http://www.orahyplabs.com

• Development of multiple hierarchies

  Our tax department want to create a separate breast of Hyperion which differs from our public report structure. I'm new on this and want to know where I can start looking how we go on creating this. I know that I can add a new child of parent structure separated from our public report structure, but how the data copying on this new tax structure. Is it copied once I consolidate? Any guidance is appreciated.

  No problem, do not hesitate to award points since you marked the question as answered, would be appreciated.

• Rotating multiple .pdfs both

  I've got about 2000 pdf files that need to be turned. As I really would rather not sit at my desk and each individually I'm looking for a way to make them all at once.

  The only condition is that pdf files NEED to have the same file name and the path they did before the rotation. Each pdf is linked to a database to change the names of file mess my VBA code big time!

  Surely, there must be a simple way to do what I can not just spot me!

  Any thoughts welcome!

  Thank you guys!

  If you have Acrobat Pro you can do in a batch sequence (Advanced menu, Document Processing, batch...).

• Validation of multiple models

  I try to have the LC to validate three different patterns in a text field. One would be a letter followed by 6 numbers, two is 6 numbers and three is 9 digits. That's what I have so far. It's close, but not quite do what I need. It's properly validate one, but with two and three, it's whatever it is between 6 and 9 numbers, allowing not just 6 or 9 numbers. Suggestions?

  var

  r = new RegExp();

  r.Compile ("^ [a-zA-Z] + [0-9] {6} |") [0-9] {6} | "[0-9] {9} $"

  , "i");

  var

  result = r.test (this.) RawValue);

  If

  (result == true)

  true ;

  on the other

  fake ;

  I think you must group your regex to get the beginning of the string and at the end of the anchor chain works, try

  ^ ([a-zA-Z] + [0-9] {6} |) [0-9] {6} | ([0-9] {9}) $

  Having brackets after the beginning before the end of the chain anchor and anchor chain.

  Without the brackets at the beginning of the anchor chain applies to the first model and the end of the string to the second anchor model so the central motif is allowed for matching numbers 6, 7, or 8.