VLAN ESW-540

Similar Questions

• Switch connection SG300 ESW 540

  I have a problem connecting my ESW 540 to new supplementary switch Csico SG300. Is the uplink port must be configured differently?

  The port of the ESW becomes inactive when I connected to the port of SG 300.

  Thank you.

  Untung,

  Specify the switch or disable SmartPort role on the port.

  -Marty

• Two problems with a single ESW-540-24

  We sold an ESW 540 switch a customer to 3COM, which replaces the old equipment. This replacement will be on different faces, then connect some switches 3COM to Cisco equipment. We install rigth now and this two situations:

  • Machines virtual can´t obtain IP through DHCP addresses (using a different MAC address) when it is connected to the Cisco switch. Physical machines receive the IP addresses of the DHCP server without problem. This situation happened with 3COM switches.
  • When we interconect switch Cisco switches 3COM (do not use the uplink ports) the connection never goes up. Remembering that the 3COM switches are old we sets the speed to 100 Mbps Full Duplex, but it did not work.

  Please help me configure the Cisco switch,

  Kind regards

  Jiga.

  Hello Juan,.

  It is possible that the two problems may be related by the same question. The ESW 500 series uses a wizard smartport. If you want to test this, open a session in the ESW and under the home page, access the smartport Wizard and change the port to 'other '.

  Often the default value is set on computer, which allows only a MAC address to register on this port. This will stop most of the switches to transit traffic and in this case a second MAC address of your VM stops passing traffic.

• ESW-540-8 P, http connection and browsers

  Howdy,

  Portal: cisco-onplus

  VAR: 1913

  Client: 5651 (USS Nautilus SSN-571)

  Version: with On - 100K 9

  ESW540 - 8 p on a network with the default settings. The goal is to connect through proxy http OnPlus http (kubrick) devices management I / F and change the settings.

  By the compatibility of the devices for ESW540, I define http (port 80) as a method of connection and allow to "set the headers.

  Using a PC connected locally, I checked that I can establish http connection directly (without proxy OnPlus) using IE, firefox, and Safari browsers on multiple platforms (2 win 7 PCs (FF, IE, Safari), 1 iPhone4. () Safari).  In all cases, I'm able to establish the http connection to the ESW540 connection - 8 p and perform operations remotely on the device http user interface through the user interface of the browsers.

  However, when I try the same when connected remotely through OnPlus, I get different behaviors for success/failure in the browser I use.

  When I use Firefox or IE, as soon as I click on the 'Connect' button on the modal system, a browser window is launched as planned.

  For IE (IE7) on both Win7 computers, 10 seconds after the launch of the window, the device UI presents its login screen. I provide credentials for the connection. Soon after, a partial rendering of the page main 'status' for the device is presented on the user interface of the browser. I can see the CSS styles of painting, but I see no text, areno visible URL and the simulation planned device indicator is not visible. Clearly, the appliance http server enabled connection. Shortly after the connection information has been presented, a dialog box appears that States "disconnected from server...". "xlx...

  For firefox (FF 6.02) on the two WIn7PCs, I get the same behavior with one exception - the connection process does not have the point of view of the page for the device UI http authentication.

  Note, I am able to navigate, to connect to and manipulate all the pages of the user interface http to a cable modem TWC ODM built... using any platform and one of the three browsers.

  Also of note, I have configured the ESW540 - 8 p to the backup configuration file automatically and every night. This automatic access (using the credentials provided in the "References" of the modal device tab) works very well... even if she does not resemble his support in the list of devices.

  I suspect that it is a FF/IE browser config issues with specific pains of Kubrick (Java?). But I'm just guessing. Fortunately, I have Safari on all three devices, so this isn't a big deal. Ideallly, however, I prefer using FF - manage my browser of choice for all the other things-webby.

  Any help appreciated.

  See you soon,.

  Dave

  PS - I told you lately how 'killer' this "Cisco OnPlus" remote service is? It is beautiful thing you've built.

  Captain Howdy!

  The ESW540 was a little 'fun' with cross-launch. We expect a potential MR later this fall that may be able to answer some of these questions. In the meantime, I'll get the documentation updated to reflect the following details on ESW540 support.

  1. the port 80 and "Headers of difficulty" are correct configuration items to set for cross-launch.

  2. the Safari browser works fine, but you have to ignore the pop-up "lost connection". Everything works perfectly.

  3 Firefox has a particular problem. When you connect first with firefox, you'll get an error. It is different with different versions of firefox. If you copy the URL and open a new window, and then paste the URL into the new window, things will work (again, with the message lost connection to ignore).

  4 IE tends to work perfectly, without any problem. I have only tested with IE8. There could be a problem with IE7.

  These problems come from the fact that OnPlus was not there when the ESW has been developed and switches don't usually do the test to be able to withstand to be connected through a firewall. New SMB devices are tested with OnPlus in order to avoid this type of problem in the future.

  Specifically, there is a behavior of Web Management page in the ESW trys to be compatible with all web browsers and it breaks down when you launch into another page, or by an indirect method.

  Enjoy,

  Robert

  PS I'm glad you like it. Your praise seems strangely familiar though ;-)

• Are there plans for the new ESW 500 models switch with PoE capability?

  I know that current models of ESW 500 switch don't have enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4, even if the ESW-540-8 p model has almost enough capacity to power all the switchports to 15.4.

  Reasons why new ESW 500 switch with PoE capacity are necessary:

  • The existing PoE 500 ESW switches have not always enough when these devices are deployed with the UC500:
    • 7945, 7965 and 797 x phones
    • series phones (not yet supported with the SBCS solution) 9900 and 8900
    • PVC2300 Surveillance Cameras
    • AP541N access points
  • The UC560 comes with all the PoE ports and requires at least an ESW switch be deployed
  • Version 48 ports gigabit switch ESW is currently available only in the version not PoE, and we need a version of 48 gigabit ports for users of the UC560 solution.

  Existing ESW 500 switch PoE capabilities are:

  • ESW-520-8 P: 60W
  • ESW-540-8 P: 120W
  • ESW-520-24 P: 180W
  • ESW-540-48P: 380W
  • ESW-540-24 P: 280W

  PoE of ESW 500 switch capabilities supporting 15.4 full power on all PoE PoE ports are:

  • 8 port: 123.2W
  • 24 port: 369.6W
  • 48 port: 739.2W

  Are there plans to release the new ESW 500 switch models increased capacity, enough to supply the full 15.4 to all PoE ports with PoE?

  Hi John - Thank you for your participation in the small community of business support. I talked to our switch product manager and want to share his response.

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "}

  We have taken the conscious decision to deliver PoE as ESW and other switches for small businesses for several reasons:

  • Endpoints PoE more attract a lot less than the 15.4 W maximum power. Most IP phones are below the range of 7W.
  • A typical deployment would most PoE devices connect to a switch.
  • For these reasons, the ESW is not burdened cost with the PoE feature which would not be used most of the time.
  • All ports are still able to PoE you can connect up to 24 devices PoE Switch 24 ports to any point in time, as long as the handset is in the title of the budget.
  • Therefore, given that these products are intended for small business and the price is an important factor, we opted for this approach.

  We do not have a product at full power on all ports in the Cisco Small Business portfolio, except in the arena of 8 channels. Within Cisco, Cisco Catalyst products support this today.

  Thanks again for the question,

  Stephanie Reaves

  Cisco Small Business

• ESW-520-8 p-K9 POE capabilities

  Can the ESW-520-8 p-K9 provide enough POE to take in charge 7 PVC2300 cameras?  If not, what are its limits?

  Hello

  The ESW 520 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any 10/100 port; Total of 60W.

  The ESW 540 8 ports offers a maximum power of 15.4 to any port 10/100/1000; Total 123W.

  By the PVC2300 datasheet, each camera has a consumption of 10W.

  If you need 7 cameras supported, you can consider the 8-port ESW540. Another option is to power the cameras via the external power adapter, assuming that a power source is nearby.

  I hope this helps.

  Bert Wilhelm

  Solutions of the APW

  Austin, TX

• only 1 VM connects the other don't

  Hi guys

  a recently installed Vmware ESXi 4.1, 2 - Broadcom NIC cards

  Broadcom BCM5709C connected to a switch of Cisco ESW 540

  We have created 2 virtual machines, but only on the virtual computer connects to my network, we have tried and tried the same results, but as soon as I connect the physical cable to another switch I WSC2960G the other virtual machine connects to and bothVM are happy.

  any idea what should I check to the physical switch? or that I have any special physical configiration first switch - ESW-540 -.

  any idea what are we missing?

  BTW

  vSwitch0 = vmnic0

  = vmnic1 vswitch1

  Thank you very much

  Not really sure, as I am not networking of the MEC, however there is a setting on the physical switch port that prevents multiple MAC addresses to connect at the same time. I think that you must specify "mode access" ("adjustment" is s.th. like "desktop mode").

  André

• Cannot set the vmkernel and service on the same vswitch console with 1 NIC

  I'm currently setting up a new VMWare environment, using Starwind on a 2008 server for shared storage.  The question that I am running is, when I put the vmkernel (xxx.xxx.xxx.177) and the Service Console (xxx.xxx.xxx.178) on vSwitch0 with 1 card NETWORK, I can only ping the service console.  We also use a Cisco ESW 540 24 ports switch. StarWind support says they are sure it's the swithch, no fool, what needs to be changed in this respect.  If I put the VMKernel and the Service Console on VSwitches separate with separate NIC, it works fine.  Any suggestion would be appreciated.

  Make sure that the Cisco switch does not have port security enabled and allows multiple MAC addresses on the same port.

  André

• VLAN 2 switch ESW - 520

  For the test I used 2 switch this name 'ESW X' and 'Y ESW '.

  I have 2 network that I named "Network A" and "Network B".

  I build a VLAN 2 for each network named Vlan 2 for network and Vlan 3 to network B, I do not use Vlan 1 because it is the default Vlan

  Configuration ESW X:

  port e1: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  port E2: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  E3 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  E4 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  G3 port: with 1 (default) UNTTAGGED Vlan TRUNK PORT and Vlan tagged WITH 2 and 3 to Vlan

  Configuration ESW Y:

  port e1: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  port E2: access on UNTTAGGED Vlan 2 PORT

  E3 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  E4 port: PORT of ACCESS on UNTTAGGED Vlan 3

  G3 port: with 1 (default) UNTTAGGED Vlan TRUNK PORT and Vlan tagged WITH 2 and 3 to Vlan

  I use for the test computer 2 with the same class IP address.

  Test result:

  Communication between ESW X e1 and e2 x ESW => OK

  Communication between ESW X e3 and e4 x ESW => OK

  Communication between ESW e1 and e2 ESW Y => OK

  Communication between ESW e3 and e4 ESW Y => OK

  Communication between e1 ESW X and Y of the ESW e1 or e2-online NOK

  Communication between e2 ESW X and Y of the ESW e1 or e2-online NOK

  Communication between e3 ESW X and Y of the ESW e3 or e4-online NOK

  Communication between e4 ESW X and Y of the ESW e3 or e4-online NOK

  Each Vlan cannot communicate with the switch, I think they have a problem in my configuration of vlan / port, can you help me.

  Hi, Thibaud,.

  Thank you for the purchase of the ESW switches.

  Just out of curiosity, you are using the latest firmware on your version of switch ESW 2.1.19

  But of course, you seem like you have a great understanding of Tagged and VLAN no tagged of you ad description... great stuff.

  I just tried your configuration, I can communicate between ESW540 - 24 p-switch and a SF300 - 48p.

  Sorry, I don't have two switches handy ESW. But it doesn't matter. Standards based Ethernet is I hope that some standards based on ethernet

  My configuration of vlan below for my ESW540 - 24 p and it works very well.

  I plugged just ports of the switch 24 between the two switches together, that's why the 24 port is labeled in each of the screenshots below.

  I really really doubt you would have a problem, unless there is something fundimental or basic you did for example do not save the configuration running on the boot configuration.  Obviously do not save the configuration before a power down will kill the configuration.

  (saved your configuration in each switch)

  

  

  Here is a copy of a part of my switch running configuration, which were a result of me playing with the ESW configuration utility.

  (Note that my switch has all Gigabit ethernet ports ;)

  serial interface ethernet g(1-2)

  switchport vlan trunk native 2

  output

  interface ethernet g24

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2

  output

  serial interface ethernet g(3-4)

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  output

  interface ethernet g24

  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 3

  output

  If you still have questions, here's what URL to the Small Business Support Center contact, perhaps a new set of eyes can spot the problem.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  Best regards, Dave

• Get some VLAN voice to work on 5548P

  Hello

  I was wondering if there is a way to accomplish the following. I want the passage to the tag the traffic on its own based on the YES Table and pass it up to the Sonicwall (DHCP server/router) without going through the phone itself do the marking. Is this possible? Currently, the installation so I put manually the VLAN ID on the phone itself, but these phones can work anywhere there is a sense of internet connection if I manually add the tag VLAN, the phone will not work outside of the corporate network.

  Thank you

  If your phone supports LLDP-MED, you can install the switch with a VLAN voice. This wiki covers the implementation of the VLAN voice.

  http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/networking/w/wiki/configuring-Dell-PowerConnect-55xx-series-switch-voice-VLAN.aspx

  Do not have to configure phones that you configure LLDP-MED. The VLAN ID information are passed with LLDP-MED configured on the VoIP phone using the LLDP-MED mechanism. By this method, the voice from the VoIP phone data are tagged with the VLAN ID exchanged and the usual traffic would go to the PVID.

  Here is the link to the user guide. LLDP-MED configuration begins at page 540.

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/ Manuals /Cccomplis /powerconnect-5524_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.pdf

  Once the phone is in the voice VLAN it can still receive an IP address by the DHCP server using the DHCP relay. The switch acts as a DHCP relay agent that listens for DHCP messages,

  and passes between DHCP servers and clients, residing in IP or VLAN different subnets.

  Relay DHCP and espionage begins on page 563 of the user guide.

  I hope this helps.

• ESW520 CONFIGURATION OF VLAN

  I plan to set up the VLAN separate voice and data on my network, 2 VLANS and VLAN 3, respectively.
  At the distribution level, I have a single switch catalyst 2960 S TS.
  At the access layer to the I have catalyst 2960 TC for ESW520 Poe switch for sip phones and data.
  SIP phones are Yealink T20P with two Ethernet ports (port WAN and PC port) the two ports can be assigned to VLANS.
  The WAN port on the sip phone connects to the switch Poe ESW520 and some PC connects to the PC port on the sip phone.
  On the access layer catalyst I will configure access for connection ports to the PC Mode and Trunk Mode for switch - switch.

  My challenge is, if for example I have configure the phone sip WAN and PC ports as members of the 2 VLANS and VLAN 3 respectively, what will be the configuration of the ports on my Poe switch. Keeping in mind that traffic from a PC connected to the phone will be the tag VLAN 3 and it should flow through the phone on the switch port Poe

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  Hi, you must configure the profiles of smart port otherwise it does usually work with ESW switches.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• ESW-520-24 p not able to connect to a Catalyst 3560 G + compatible with SPA942?

  Hi all

  a customer bought an ESW-520-24 p for use in a VoIP project. Today we had difficulties to connect to a switch of 3650 G of catalyst; We tried to set the port to the trunk, general, customer and access and changed all sorts of settings VLAN on the 3560G switch nothing helps: the switches just interconnection used. While sniffing, we saw that the ARP requests are unresponsive even, if something is at a low level, no doubt with VLAN-ing.

  Someone at - it an idea if these switches must be connected between them and if so, what do I do?

  On the other hand; voice turns on VLANS separated and the customer will use SPA942 phones that have an internal switch that allows a PC to connect. I used this call successfully with the Catalyst Express switches and I didn't have to do anything for VLAN-ing, it worked 'out of the box. Can anyone confirm that these phones work with switches for small businesses as well?

  THX!

  Bart

  Hi Bart,.

  I quickly set up the simulation.  It took me more time to write this that actually do the work.

  I grabbed my handy Cisco 3560 catalyst switch.  I plugged port FastEthernet 23 plugged into my UC520.  My Uc520 is my voice system and the DHCP server.

  I have the 24 FastEthernet port connected to my Cisco 3560 in my ESW540 - 24 p.  On 3 of my ESW540 switch port - 24 p, I plugged a phone SPA962...

  I guess that my simulation is close enough to your hardware.  The configuration should be the same I guess.

  Here is the configuration of my Cisco 3560 switch;

  interface FastEthernet0/23

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/24

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport autostate exclude

  switchport mode trunk

  interface Vlan1

  192.168.10.3 IP address 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Vlan100 (VLAN100 ends on my UC520 and has the DHCP scope)

  no ip address

  !

  interface Vlan200

  no ip address

  !

  Check that the tree covering weight is not blocking the ports of uplink with the command show spanning tree. I ask you to try what I must admit that this uplink to my UC520 was in a BLK State on the VLAN by default.  I HAD TO CORRECT.

  I plugged my phone SPA962 on my ESW switch, it lit.

  VLAN 100 as my voice VLAN, I had to set manually what VLAN the SPA phone will reside in.  Otherwise, it will try to retrieve a default IP VLAN.

  • I have manually by pressing the button (below the button of the envelope) on the phone in the SPA
  • Scroll down and select 'network '.
  • Scroll again option VLAN and select Edit.
  • I changed the setting to select Enable VLAN Yes.
  • Click the OK button.
  • I then scroll down to the option VLAN ID.
  • Choose the edit button to change the VLAN ID information
  • I register 100 to and selected OK.

  My phone has received an IP address from my 100 VLAN address 10.1.1.X.

  Fortunately, the ESW520 has a pretty good GUI, in which case you can add a new vlan and the trunk at all ports.

  Here's an example of how I added the vlan 200 to the ESW switch and started adding the Tagged ports switch ports.  I have to do all the ports where you need a VLAN.

  

  I then as seen below my new adds VLAN as a port Tagged to all ports of the switch.

  You can see from my screenshot below I was adding VLAN 200 to interface G2 as labeled interface.

  

  Don't forget NOT to SAVE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS ON BOTH THE 3560 and the ESW520

  

  hope this helps

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW 520 give priority to IP addresses

  I have a LAN with IP addresses for the computers and public, static IP for VoIP phones. They are a hosted VoIP provider, and I want to give priority to the public IPs from my ESW-520-48 per switch How I implemented that in this switch?

  I have no roles assigned on ports and no configuration of VLAN either. I had tried to separate the VLAN first, but eliminated this way. It is once again all VLAN 1 now on the switch. For some reason when I put in place of the 100 VLAN for voice, the voice stopped working on phones, but data were always very good.

  Hi netguy,.

  QOS in rewriting the DSCP (dissociated Services Code Point) address IP phone range by;

  1. create an ACL that specifies the range of IP addresses with mask reverse

  2. attach the ACL on a map of advanced class, then

  3. fix a plan of class to a table of QOS policy that is configured to set a new DSCP value

  4. attach a QOS policy on an interface

  5 but you have a default Advanced QOS configuration already in place, so that should be modified or deleted.

  It is difficult if you have never played with before advanced QOS or understand the latest five statements.

  I guess that your hosted IP phones have DSCP settings (dissociated Services Code Point) already placed on IP phones or the settings that you can set directly on each IP phone?

  If it is possible, why not just move the switch to the basic QOS mode and then say the switch to trust DSCP.

  Well, it's the best thing to do.

  

  

  Best regards, Dave

• ESW-520-24 P has not managed the custom VIRTUAL local network traffic

  Hi all

  We recently bought a switch ESW-520-24 p to replace a CE500 end-of-life.  The facility where the switch is installed has access wireless connected to the VLAN 110 points.

  Course the ESW-520-24 p switch does not support VTP so none VLAN is to be propagated to it.  So I created 110 VLAN manually and ports assigned to him.  But the devices on ports communicate with anything.

  All ports are configured as access with 110 ports VLAN not identified.  The uplink is the g2 port which is in binding mode.

  Can someone please tell me what I can have configured wrong?

  Thank you

  -Steve

  Hi Steve,.

  If it is for UC500 installation, the default configuration on the ESW is normally perfect and the switch has to be turned on.

  Otherwise that looks like you have made the correct things.

  I guess VLAN1 is always present on the ESW switch, but excluded by access ports...

  All ports are not marked in VLAN110 except for the uplink, given that the packages of vlan tagged while waiting to switch receiver VLAN110 or unmarked packages?  (something to think quickly)

  But the result is if you are still in a stalemate, why not call the Small Business Support Center, the switch is probably still under warranty and telephone support.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  Best regards, Dave

• App 5.1 server does not not on different VLANS

  Helloooo

  I just installed a new server and I use the server application. Everything seemed to work fine until I moved my iMac to a VLAN different. Profiles and update settings do not push to the iMac and sit at a stadium in waiting. Also to register the new iMacs on the server I get to the login server window and it crashes it and does not authenticate. Screen opens by saying that I can open a second window and registration. When I try to register, I get an unknown error and that it fails. It seems timeless. I tried to change a lot of settings prescribed by other users, but nothing helped. Someone at - it advice on what could be the problem.

  See you soon

  Sean

  Hello

  I took the easy on this way and bring a USB ethernet to my mac so that I have two physical interfaces. An in each VLAN.

  There are other ways to do this, and this is a good article:

  https://blog.Pivotal.IO/Labs/Labs/using-deploystudio-across-Subnets-a-Path-Not-t Aken

  Kind regards

  Erik