VPN and router cisco 887

Similar Questions

• Question of VPNS and router

  Hello

  I currently have a RV042G in my company.  It works fine, but I was looking for a solution that would allow me to use VPN so that I can tunnel inside and then again connect to the internet via the tunnel.  I want to have a way secure to connect to internet from my laptop while I am travelling and prefer to build my own VPN and do it myself.

  If I understand correctly, the RV042G does not allow this and it only access to the local network via the tunnel. What would be the next router allowing him to fill this purpose?

  Thank you!

  Hi rodman

  These devices work fine, you can also use third-party software not only software from Cisco to use the VPN features. On subscriptions, IAPH supports more special features such link Protect and IP addresses and you can have and buy a subscription in order to add these features to your device, however, if Don t you want what they you don t have to buy.

  Cisco provide one of the best support, it has plenty of support, it is possible via chat, email or telephone, it also provide assistance free of charge for the users of this forum if you don t buy a warranty

  I hope you find this answer useful,

  * Please answer question mark or note the fact other users can benefit from the TI *.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• SSL VPN and routing problem

  Hi all

  I have a strange architecture including VPN and I have a few problems that I am not able to solve:

  -J' use the ssl vpn gateway to allocate internal IP addresses of the local network described in the schema (8.8.2.0 or 8.8.3.0 according to the tunnel-group network.

  -The purpose is for vpn clients directly access the internal network.

  This works very well if there are strictly internal communications within the network. But recently, we have installed an application that needs to access both networks. No problem, I thought, but I was wrong, there seems to be a problem of routing inherent in the architecture in place.

  Let me explain the problem:

  -When I access the VPN, for example I will gave the 8.8.3.5 ip address.

  -Im running the application that needs to open a page on the web server, located at 8.8.2.120

  -l'asa receive my tcp syn datagram and forward it directly to the directly connected interface fa0/1 (based on the routing table)

  -the web server returns the response, but he sends on its default gateway which is the cisco 6509.

  -6509 it sends its vlan svi 2000

  - and finally the ASA it receives on its interface fa0/2 but seems he falls as she opened a tcp on fa0/1 connection and receives the response on fa0/2.

  I want it's traffic by tunnel to bypass the connected roads and transmit it to a default gateway of tunnel. This would ensure that the path for the request and the response would be the same.

  I would like to know if there are orders of debugging for routing decisions validate my theory?

  Do you know of any response to solve this problem?

  Thanks a lot for your help.

  When you configure the TCP State derivation always think ' which way is the SYN package coming?

  Routing failed messages always have source and destination, are of course copied the entire message?

  BTW, instead of letting clients SSL addresses attributed to vlan2000? Why not give them a separate subnet and the road back via correct interface?

  I would also check your config and the routing :-) table

  Marcin

• VPN tunnel between the concentrator 3005 and router Cisco 827

  I am trying to establish a VPN tunnel between the Central Office with VPN 3005 and controller branch Cisco 827 router.

  There is a router of perimeter with access set up in front of the 3005 list.

  I quote the ACLs on the Central perimeter router instructionsuivante to allow traffic to permit ip 3005 - acl 101 all 193.188.X.X (address of the hub)

  I get the following message appears when I try to ping a local host in the Central site.

  Can Anyoune give me the correct steps to 827 and 3005.

  Thank you

  CCNP Ansar.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Debug crypto ISAKMP

  encryption of debugging engine

  Debug crypto his

  debug output

  ------------------

  1d20h: IPSEC (sa_request):,.

  (Eng. msg key.) Local OUTGOING = 172.22.113.41, distance = 193.188.108.165.

  local_proxy = 202.71.244.160/255.255.255.240/0/0 (type = 4),

  remote_proxy = 128.128.1.78/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

  Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

  lifedur = 3600 s and KB 4608000,

  SPI = 0x83B8AC1B (2209917979), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0x400D

  1d20h: ISAKMP: ke received message (1/1)

  1d20h: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM

  Former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): early changes of Main Mode

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): will increment the error counter on his: retransmit the phase 1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE...

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): will increment the error counter on his: retransmit the phase 1

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): retransmission phase 1 MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: ISAKMP (0:1): lot of 193.188.108.165 sending (I) MM_NO_STATE

  1d20h: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 1,.

  You must also allow the esp Protocol in your ACL.

  access-list 101 permit esp any host x.x.x.x (address of the hub)

  Hope this helps,

  -Nairi

• Problem with IPsec VPN between ASA and router Cisco - ping is not response

  Hello

  I don't know because the IPsec VPN does not work. This is my setup (IPsec VPN between ASA and R2):

  my network topology data:

  LAN 1 connect ASA - 1 (inside the LAN)

  PC - 10.0.1.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.1

  ASA - GigabitEthernet 1: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0

  -----------------------------------------------------------------

  ASA - 1 Connect (LAN outide) R1

  ASA - GigabitEthernet 0: 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252

  R1 - FastEthernet 0/0: 172.30.1.1 255.255.255.252

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------

  R1 R2 to connect

  R1 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.1 255.255.255.252

  R2 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252

  R2 for lan connection 2

  --------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 to connect LAN2

  R2 - FastEthernet 0/0: 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0

  PC - 10.0.2.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.1

  ASA configuration:

  1 GigabitEthernet interface
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
  no downtime
  interface GigabitEthernet 0
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  IP 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252
  no downtime
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.1.1

  ------------------------------------------------------------

  access-list scope LAN1 to LAN2 ip 10.0.1.0 allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
  object obj LAN
  subnet 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
  object obj remote network
  10.0.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
  NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source obj-local obj-local destination obj-remote control remote obj non-proxy-arp static

  -----------------------------------------------------------
  IKEv1 crypto policy 10
  preshared authentication
  aes encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 3600
  Crypto ikev1 allow outside
  crypto isakmp identity address

  ------------------------------------------------------------
  tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 ipsec-attributes
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key cisco123
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-192 ASA1TS, esp-sha-hmac ikev1

  -------------------------------------------------------------
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 is the LAN1 to LAN2 address
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set peer 172.30.2.2
  card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set transform-set ASA1TS ikev1
  card crypto ASA1VPN set 10 security-association life seconds 3600
  ASA1VPN interface card crypto outside

  R2 configuration:

  interface fastEthernet 0/0
  IP 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
  no downtime
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  IP 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252
  no downtime

  -----------------------------------------------------

  router RIP
  version 2
  Network 10.0.2.0
  network 172.30.2.0

  ------------------------------------------------------
  access-list 102 permit ahp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
  access-list 102 permit esp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
  access-list 102 permit udp host 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2 eq isakmp
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  IP access-group 102 to

  ------------------------------------------------------
  crypto ISAKMP policy 110
  preshared authentication
  aes encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 42300

  ------------------------------------------------------
  ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 172.30.1.2

  -----------------------------------------------------
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 128 R2TS

  ------------------------------------------------------

  access-list 101 permit tcp 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

  ------------------------------------------------------

  R2VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
  match address 101
  defined by peer 172.30.1.2
  PFS Group1 Set
  R2TS transformation game
  86400 seconds, life of security association set
  interface fastEthernet 0/1
  card crypto R2VPN

  I don't know what the problem

  Thank you

  If the RIP is not absolutely necessary for you, try adding the default route to R2:

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1

  If you want to use RIP much, add permissions ACL 102:

  access-list 102 permit udp any any eq 520

• The IPSec VPN and routing

  Hello

  I was polishing my PSAB on since I am currently in a job where I can't touch a lot of this stuff.  By a laboratory set up a site to IPSec VPN between two routers IOS.

  For example:

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9422/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba1d0a.shtml

  The routers must specify how to route to the protected network.  Although I guess they could just use a default route to 172.17.1.2 as well.

  for example IP road 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.1.2

  172.17.1.2 won't have the slightest clue as to how to route for 10.10.10.0

  Even in an example with a tunnel between the ASA and the router IOS ASA failed to indicate a direct route to the subnet protected from 10.20.10.0, but it must still have a default route configuration. (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#CLI)

  So it is basically saying, to reach the protected subnet to resolve the next hop on a device that has no idea where this subnet is anyway.  Shouldn't all the peer IP-based routing, and not on a subnet that routers between the two should have no idea they exist?

  The main hypothesis that I have here is that the protected subnets are not accessible unless the VPN tunnel is up.  Most of my experience of the VPN site-to-site is with PIX / ASA, and I've never had to specify a route towards the protected subnet (for example 172.16.228.0).  I guess he just used his default gateway that has an Internet IP belonging to the ISP.  However the ISP has no idea where is 172.16.228.0.

  Edit: I found a thread, do not report with Cisco but IPSec in general, this seems to be the question in case I don't have a lot of sense:

  http://comments.Gmane.org/Gmane.OS.OpenBSD.misc/192986

  He still does not seem logical to me.  If I have a tunnel linking the two class C networks by internet, the only routers having knowledge of these networks are the two counterparts.  Why a course should be (static, dynamic, default etc,) which seems to send traffic to a device that do not know where is the class C networks?  Although I have to take in my example with the 172.17.228.0 my ASA was not actually sends out packets to my ISP gateway with 172.17.228.0 in them.

  The purpose of the trail is * not * to send traffic to your next jump. You are right that the next hop router has no idea what to do with this package. This way is important for the local operation. The router must find the interface of output for the package. 'S done it with the road to the next-hop-router. If you remember that the road to your peer IPSec, your router must do a recursive search routing. After the outging interface is found, traffic is sent to this interface, the card encryption on this interface jumps and protects your traffic that is routed to your IPSec peer.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• 802 1 q trunk between ESX server and router Cisco

  Hello team.

  I want to create 3 VLANs on my server ESXi, each with 2 VMS and these VLAN transported by an external Cisco "router on a stick", that is to say router with a configured ethernet wth 3 subinterfaces, each of them for each of VLAN (IP subnets) inside the ESXi server.

  I built the following image to explain my purpose. First it is possible to implement on ESXi? I guess it is.

  Advice will be greatly appreciated.

  Best regards, Rogelio ([email protected])

  

  It will work very well. Ive done a similar thing in the past, but rather than use sub interfaces I used Lass rather on a layer 3 switch.

• How to download to my Cisco 887 Device IOS...

  Hello

  I would like updrage IOS for my ADSL/router Cisco 887.

  I found a version of firmware named c800-universalk9-mz. Spa. 154 - 3.M3.bin but my rom is named c880xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  When I put the c800 firmware, it says ' % caveat: an executable not valid for this file system.

  So I have a doubt about the IOS to take, I do a version of the show to be sure.

  Can someone give me the file name and the path of the last IOS for my device please?

  See the version
  Cisco IOS software, software C880 (C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  ROM: System Bootstrap SOFTWARE VERSION, Version 12.4 (22r) YB5 (fc1)

  System image file is "flash: c880data-universalk9 - mz.150 - 1.M1.bin.

  Cisco 887 (MPC8300) processor (revision 1.0) with 236544K / 25600K bytes of memory.
  Card processor ID FCZ141692W5

  4 interfaces FastEthernet
  1 ISDN basic rate interface
  1 ATM interface
  1 module of virtual private network (VPN)
  256K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
  126000K bytes of ATA CompactFlash (read/write)

  License info:

  License IDU:

  -------------------------------------------------
  Device SN # PID
  -------------------------------------------------
  * 0 FCZ141692W5 CISCO887-SEC-K9

  License information for "c880 - data".
  License level: advipservices Type: Permanent
  Next reboot license level: advipservices

  Configuration register is 0xE442

  Thks a lot for your help.

  The release notes for 15.4.3.M3 do not include the plain 887 in the list of the supported hardware.

  The release notes for the version that I have recommended to include it.

  If you download IOS images, you must be eligible for the support of the TAC. So feel free to prosecute to confirm.

• Need some advice about the VPN between local Cisco router and remote Watchguard

  Hi all

  I am configuring a Cisco 887 to VPN router to a device of watchguard at the remote site.

  From what I understand, the VPN tunnel is in PLACE. I can ping to the remote server on the 192.168.110.0 of the network, but whenever I try to navigate to it on the local server, it wouldn't work.

  I ping the remote server via the IP address on the local server, but not on the Cisco router. Is - will this work as expected?

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R5Router #sh crypto isakmp his

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  DST CBC conn-State id

  110.142.127.237 122.3.112.10 QM_IDLE 2045 ACTIVE

  IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R5Router #sh encryption session

  Current state of the session crypto

  Interface: Virtual-Access2

  The session state: down

  Peer: 122.3.112.10 port 500

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 1 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 6 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip host 122.3.112.10 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  Interface: Dialer0

  The session state: UP-ACTIVE

  Peer: 122.3.112.10 port 500

  IKEv1 SA: local 110.142.127.237/500 remote 122.3.112.10/500 Active

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 2, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 1 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed 6 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.110.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  FLOW IPSEC: allowed ip host 122.3.112.10 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0

  Active sAs: 0, origin: card crypto

  Crypto ACL 102, should really include only 1 line, that is to say:

  10 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.255

  and you should have the image mirror on the remote end ACL line too.

  PLS, remove the remaining lines on 102 ACL ACL.

  I guess that the ACL 101 is NAT exemption, if it is pls include "deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.110.0 0.0.0.255" on top of your current line "license".

  Clear the tunnels as well as the NAT translation table after the changes described above.

• Router Cisco IPsec VPN client

  Hello

  I would like if it is possible to make the IPsec VPN connection as a customer.

  ISP router (VDSL connection)

  <--->Cisco 887 <---->pc more with conditional redirection

  VPN router (as strongVPN)

  Thank you for your help.

  Best regards

  Hi Bruno.

  Yes the IOS router may be a VPN client, it is called easy VPN:

  How to configure Easy VPN Cisco IOS (server and client)

  * The server must be a Cisco device such as another router or an ASA.

  Keep me posted.

  Thank you.

  Portu.

  Please note all useful messages.

• Router Cisco 1941 - crypto isakmp policy command missing - IPSEC VPN

  Hi all

  I was looking around and I can't find the command 'crypto isakmp policy' on this router Cisco 1941.  I wanted to just a regular Lan IPSEC to surprise and Lan installation tunnel, the command isn't here.  Have I not IOS bad? I thought that a picture of K9 would do the trick.

  Any suggestions are appreciated

  That's what I get:

  Router (config) #crypto?
  CA Certification Authority
  main activities key long-term
  public key PKI components

  SEE THE WORM

  Cisco IOS software, software C1900 (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Updated Thursday, March 10, 10 22:27 by prod_rel_team

  ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0 M6 (1r), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  The availability of router is 52 minutes
  System returned to ROM by reload at 02:43:40 UTC Thursday, April 21, 2011
  System image file is "flash0:c1900 - universalk9-mz.» Spa. 150 - 1.M2.bin.
  Last reload type: normal charging
  Reload last reason: reload command

  This product contains cryptographic features...

  Cisco CISCO1941/K9 (revision 1.0) with 487424K / 36864K bytes of memory.
  Card processor ID FTX142281F4
  2 gigabit Ethernet interfaces
  2 interfaces Serial (sync/async)
  Configuration of DRAM is 64 bits wide with disabled parity.
  255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
  254464K bytes of system CompactFlash ATA 0 (read/write)

  License info:

  License IDU:

  -------------------------------------------------
  Device SN # PID
  -------------------------------------------------
  * 0 FTX142281F4 CISCO1941/K9

  Technology for the Module package license information: "c1900".

  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  Technology-technology-package technology
  Course Type next reboot
  -----------------------------------------------------------------
  IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent
  security, none none none
  given none none none

  Configuration register is 0 x 2102

  You need get the license of security feature to configure the IPSec VPN.

  Currently, you have 'none' for the security feature:

  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  Technology-technology-package technology
  Course Type next reboot
  -----------------------------------------------------------------
  IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent
  security, none none none
  given none none none

  Here is the information about the licenses on router 1900 series:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/routers/access/1900/hardware/installation/guide/Software_Licenses.html

• VPN between ASA and router

  Hi all

  First of all, I would like to say I'm trying to implement this on Packet trace. I would like to set up a VPN using an ASA 5505 and a Cisco router 1841 (both available on Packet trace).

  The devices can ping external IP address on the other.

  The problem is that the VPN is not established. If I run sh crypto control its isakmp on the SAA, he said: there are no SAs IKEv1

  Configurations for both devices are attached.

  No idea why it doesn't work? Sorry if it is not the right forum for this, is the first time I post. I've searched the forums and I checked some of the proposed solutions, but I have not found the answer to my problem :-(

  Thanks in advance,

  Patty

  1. On the router, there is no crypto card. Need in a manner consistent with the SAA.
  2. Your policy of phase 1 is not compatible. They settings must match on both sides (router: 3des, ASA: aes)
  3. You can adjust your NAT on both devices that tunnel traffic does not get teeth. Remember that NAT is made prior to IPsec. If you do not exempt NAT traffic, then it will not match the ACL crypto more after NAT.
  4. Yes, the forum is perfectly fine! ;-)

• VPN poor Performance - Cisco RV220W and routers WRVS4400N

  Hello

  To one of our customer IPSec VPN is established between Cisco RV 220W and routers of Cisco WRVS4400N.

  Router VPN /ISP details are as below

  Location was	Location B
  Details of the Internet ---------------------- DOWNLOAD: 6 to 10 Mbps Upload: 1 to 2 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco RV220W Firmware: 1.0.3.5 IKE policy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: Group 2 Life key: 28800 sec VPN strategy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled	Details of the Internet ------------------------- DOWNLOAD: 1.35 Mbps Upload: 1.24 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware version: V2.0.1.3 Phase 1 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 28800 sec Phase 2 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled

  From the day that VPN has been implemented, the performance was poor. Frequent disconnections sessions live to the VPN nodes and very low transfer rate was alarming to users.

  The servers in A location and users to the site B gets authenticated at the server DC level in A location

  Applications of Terminal Server remote as Quickbooks, QQ Evolution, attendance RX serve also the location has by users to the location B

  The login is your time and all applications are extremely slow.

  I tried to copy files between share data between two locations and the results are as follows

  Location A to location B-> 130 Kbps 140 Kbps

  Location location B A-> 150 Kbps to 160 Kbps

  What can be the problem for these poor performance VPN?

  -Change the encryption for the least secure OF THE /MD5 would have a significant impact because it can reduce the overload on the routers?

  -Even if both routers are routers SMB, it has really good VPN flow according to the data sheets. I couldn't find VPN flow mentioned in the WRVS4400N data sheet. One of the sons of CSC, I also noticed the VPN of WRVS4400N flow seemed really low as only about 1.6Mbps. (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2107881)  Whereas RV220W router has VPN 90Mbps flow, according to the datasheet.

  So, what can be the cause of the problem and what can be fixes possible?

  Help, please!

  ANUP sisi

  Beginner to router Cisco VPN, please help

  RVS4000 was designed to work in a small office. It supports 5 VPN tunnels with a maxium of 2 Mbps flow measured in a laboratory environment. It has a processor that has a motor integrated IPS, who would deliver 20 Mbps LAN - WAN throughput when IPS is enabled.

  RV220W has been designed to operate in a slightly larger office with 25 IPsec VPN tunnels. It has a processor that has a built-in cryptographic engine able to deliver throughput 90 Mbps of IPsec. RV220W also supports 5 SSL VPN tunnels that can be used by employees and business partners for remote access.

• PIX 501 and VPN Linksys router (WRV200)

  I inherited a work where we have a Cisco PIX 501 firewall to a single site and Linksys WRV200 Router VPN on two other

  sites. Asked me to connect these routers Linksys firewall PIX via the VPN.

  According to me, the Linksys vpn routers can only connect via IPSec VPN, I'm looking for help on the configuration of the PIX 501 for the linksys to connect with the following, if possible.

  Key exchange method: Auto (IKE)

  Encryption: Auto, 3DES, AES128, AES192, AES256

  Authentication: MD5

  Pre Shared Key: xxx

  PFS: Enabled

  Life ISAKMP key: 28800

  Life of key IPSec: 3600

  The pix, I installed MDP and I tried to use the VPN wizard without result.

  I chose the following settings when you make the VPN Wizard:

  Type of VPN: remote VPN access

  Interface: outside

  Type of Client VPN device used: Cisco VPN Client

  (can choose customer of Cisco VPN 3000, MS Windows Client by using the client MS Windows using L2TP, PPTP)

  VPN clients group

  Name of Group: RabyEstates

  Pre Shared Key: rabytest

  Scope of the Client authentication: disabled

  Address pool

  Name of the cluster: VPN - LAN

  Starter course: 192.168.2.200

  End of row: 192.168.2.250

  Domain DNS/WINS/by default: no

  IKE policy

  Encryption: 3DES

  Authentication: MD5

  Diffie-Hellman group: Group 2 (1024 bits)

  Transform set

  Encryption: 3DES

  Authentication: MD5

  I have attached the log of the VPN Linksys router VPN.

  This is the first time that I have ever worked with PIX so I'm still trying to figure the thing to, but I'm confident with the CCNA level network.

  Thanks for your help!

  Hello

  Everything looks fine for me, try to have a computer in every network and ping between them. Check the newspapers/debug and fix them.

  Let me know.

  See you soon,.

  Daniel

• Private of IPSec VPN-private network between ASA and router

  Hello community,

  This is first time for me to configure IPSec VPN between ASA and router. I have an ASA 5540 at Headquarters and 877 router to EH Branch

  Headquarters ASA summary.

  Peer IP: 111.111.111.111

  Local network: 10.0.0.0

  Branch

  Peer IP: 123.123.123.123

  LAN: 192.168.1.0/24

  Please can someone help me set up the vpn.

  Hello

  This guide covers exactly what you need:

  Establishment of ASDM and SDM - http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/273.html

  Tunnel VPN - ASA to the router configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#ASDM

  Kind regards

  Jimmy