VPN between PIX and ASA

I have a vpn beteen two sites, which works very well. traffic is launched from site A and can connect to the site B ok.

I just tried to set up traffic from site B to site A, but its failure the vpn encrypt point. I checked the acl and they match:

site A (PIX)

Crypto acl

access-list site_a permit tcp host 10.51.3.32 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 eq 3389

no nat

no_nat list of allowed access host ip 10.51.3.32 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0

site B (ASA)

Crypto acl

Site_B list extended access permitted tcp 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 host 10.51.3.32 eq 3389

no nat

access-list extended sheep allowed ip 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.51.3.32 host

the only difference I see is the extended acl, but it works well in one direction?

Thank you

Hello

Using port-based ACLs for crypto card is not recommended, use IP access lists and configure VPN filters to implement port restrictions.

http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

Kind regards

Averroès

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

Site to Site VPN between PIX and Linksys RV042

I am trying to create a tunnel between a 506th PIX and a Linksys RV042 vpn . I configured the Phase 1 and Phase 2 as well as the transformation defined and interested traffic and connected to the external interface, but it will not create the tunnel. Configurations are as follows:

506th PIX running IOS 6.3

part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 40
ISAKMP policy 40 cryptographic 3des
ISAKMP policy 40 sha hash
40 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP duration strategy of life 40 86400
ISAKMP key * address 96.10.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.21.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0crypto map Columbia_to_Office 10 ipsec-isakmp
crypto Columbia_to_Office 10 card matches the address 101
card crypto Columbia_to_Office 10 set peer 96.10.xxx.xxx
10 Columbia_to_Office transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game
Columbia_to_Office interface card crypto outside

Linksys RV042

Configuration of local groups
IP only
IP address: 96.10.xxx.xxx
Type of local Security group: subnet
IP address: 192.168.1.0
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

Configuration of the remote control groups
IP only
IP address: 66.192.xxx.xxx
Security remote control unit Type: subnet
IP address: 192.168.21.0
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

IPSec configuration
Input mode: IKE with preshared key
Group Diffie-Hellman phase 1: group2
Phase 1 encryption: 3DES
Authentication of the phase 1: SHA1
Life of ITS phase 1: 86400

Phase2 encryption: 3DES
Phase2 authentication: SHA1
Phase2 life expectancy: 3600 seconds
Pre-shared key *.

I'm a novice on the VPN. Thanks in advance for your expertise.

Yes, version PIX 6.3 does not support HS running nat or sh run crypto.

Please please post the complete config if you don't mind.

Please also try to send traffic between subnets 2 and get the output of:

See the isa scream his

See the ipsec scream his

PIX and ASA static, dynamic and RA VPN does not

Hello

I am facing a very interesting problem between a PIX 515 and an ASA 5510.

The PIX is in HQ and has several dynamic VPN connections (around 130) and IPsec vpn remote works very well. I had to add a PIX to ASA L2L VPN static and it does not work as it is supposed to be. The ASA 5510, at the remote end, connects and rest for a small period of time, however, all other VPN connections stop working.

The most interesting thing is that ASA is associated with the dynamic map and not the static map that I created (check by sh crypto ipsec his counterpart x.x.x.x). However, if I make any changes in the ACL 'ACL-Remote' it affects the tunnel between the PIX and ASA.

Someone saw something like that?

Here is more detailed information:

HQ - IOS 8.0 (3) - PIX 515

ASA 5510 - IOS 7.2 (3) - remote provider

Several Huawei and Cisco routers dynamically connected via ADSL

Several users remote access IPsec

A VPN site-to site static between PIX and ASA - does not.

Here is the config on the PIX:

Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec esp-3des esp-sha-hmac

Dyn - VPN game 100 Dynamics-card crypto transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec

Crypto dynamic-map Dyn - VPN 100 the value reverse-road

VPN - card 30 crypto card matches the ACL address / remote

card crypto VPN-card 30 peers set 20 x. XX. XX. XX

card crypto VPN-card 30 the transform-set ESP-3DES-ESP-SHA-HMAC-IPSec value

VPN crypto card - 100 - isakmp dynamic Dyn - VPN ipsec

interface card crypto VPN-card outside

crypto ISAKMP allow outside

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

preshared authentication

3des encryption

md5 hash

Group 2

life 86400

crypto ISAKMP policy 65535

preshared authentication

3des encryption

sha hash

Group 2

life 86400

access list ACL-remote ext ip 10.0.0.0 allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

Thank you.

Marcelo Pinheiro

The problem is that the ASA has a crypto acl defined between host and network, while the remote end has to the network.

Make sure that the acl is reversed.

Installation of site to site VPN IPSec using PIX and ASA

/ * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

I am a site configuration to site IPSec VPN using a PIX515E to site A and ASA5520 to Site B.

I have attached the lab diagram. Consider PIX and ASA are in default configuration, which means that nothing is configured on both devices.

According to the scheme

ASA5520

External interface is the level of security 11.11.10.1/248 0

The inside interface is 172.16.9.2/24 security level 100

Default route is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 11.11.10.2 1

PIX515E

External interface is the level of security 123.123.10.2/248 0

The inside interface is 172.16.10.1/24 security level 100

Default route is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 123.123.10.1 1

/ * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

Could someone tell me how to set up this configuration? I tried but didn't workout. Here is the IKE protocol I have used.

IKE information:

IKE Encrytion OF

MD5 authentication method

Diffie Helman Group 2

Failure to life

IPSEC information:

IPsec encryption OF

MD5 authentication method

Failure to life

Please enter the following command

on asa

Sysopt connection permit VPN

on pix not sure of the syntax, I think it is

Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

What we are trying to do here is basically allowing vpn opening ports

Alternatively you can open udp 500 and esp (or port ip 50) out to in on the two firewalls

Version 7.0 of the PIX and ASA 5500

Hi all

Is ASA 5500 series identical a PIX 515 or 525 or 535 with version 7.0... I still see some areas where it confused between version 7.0 of the PIX and ASA 5500 series... If not, what are the benefits of ASA 5500 on the PIX 7.0?

ASA is not the same as PIX, ASA is different hardware architecture. Although both can run the same code. One of the benefits of the SAA is that you can have an IPS module in it to make the prevention of intrusions.

Search for comprarison on CCO.

PIX and ASA Site to Site (ACL)

I am trying to configure a VPN tunnel from site to site between my PIX515 (6.3) to a seller ASA 5510. We can get the tunnel when the ACL match is all of this period, but when we try to use TCP and a specific port, nothing comes through. Any thoughts? I would be able to limit the interesting traffic to what is not necessary? I'm only looking on the side of the ASA to access a resource on the side of PIX on 1521 TCP. The side PIX didn't need to access anything whatsoever on the side of the ASA.

PIX side ASA x.x.x.x y.y.y.y side

This ACL works...

PIX

ip host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y host access list vendor permit

ASA

host host x.x.x.x y.y.y.y ip access list vendor permit

This ACL is not...

PIX

access list provider permit TCP host x.x.x.x eq 1521 host y.y.y.y

ASA

access list provider permit TCP host x.x.x.x eq 1521 host y.y.y.y

Phase 1 Isakmp appears fine, fails just on the Ipsec data transfer.

No, only versions 7.X code support the use of the tunnel-groups and group policies that are needed to implement filtering of VPN.

I would suggest filtering traffic at the becauase of the SAA on the PIX, you will need to remove the 'permit sysopt-connection ipsec' command (if it is not already deleted) to start filtering on the external interface.

Routing over VPN between ISA550W and RV215W

Hello all I have a problem with the VPN between my two office

I have an ISA550W at the head office (chcnorth)

I have a RV215W to the remote desktop (chcsouth)

the VPN is up and running, I can connect from Headquarters to remote control (chcsouth-RV215W)

and vice versa however when client computers on the remote end are trying to connect to the

Main office to access the database, they can't.

the problem started last week I received a call from the remote desktop that they can connect to our database

on the main office, I tried to connect remotely to see what was going on, it turns out that the router has completely put back

at the plant, including the firmware

I reinstalled the latest firmware for the RV215W of installation all connections as they were, I could

get VPN to connect, I can ping to the interface of the RV215W from my seat and I ping the ISA550W

the remote desktop, however my remote clients still cannot access my server at the main office

I realized after I have everything set up, I had a backup of my original installation and thinking I had

just missed something I restored it to the firmware to factory upgraded to power and restored the backup of the

RV215W I've had. still no dice

So I am now at a loss, there were no other changes to the network on both ends, I've been on this som my eyes several times

are blurred,

any ideas, workarounds for solutions would be greatly appreciated

Thanks in advance

John G

John,

It doesn't look like your question is more DNS related, as you can access the server by its IP address if the "connection" allows you to set up this way. It is quite common, that you cannot resolve names through the tunnel because netbios broadcasts will not pass. The RV215W have shared DNS within the parameters of the tunnel, so this isn't an option more.

If the "connection" is a PC, you can work around this by editing the LMHOSTS file. Please see the following instructions:

http://www.JakeLudington.com/Windows_7/20100924_how_to_edit_windows_7_lmhosts_file.html

In your case, it might look more at:

192.168.1.200 sqlsvr

Now if you ping or try to access sqlsvr from the computer, it will automatically know that it should go to 192.168.1.200 without having to find the IP address.

Answer please if you have any questions.

-Marty

VPN between RV120W and ISA550W

Hi guys,.

Wonder if you can shed some light on my problem until I loose all my hair!

I'm trying to create a VPN between a RV120W at a remote site and our ISA500W in our offices... I can't it connect!

I'll put up an IPsec tunnel between the sites, but it does not want to connect.

Remote site - RV120W

The IKE policy table

Management / time type

Main mode Exchange

3DES encryption

AUTH - SHA-1

DH group 2

Pre-Shared Key AUTH

HIS life 28800

Xauth no

VPN

Type Auto policy

IP of remote endpoint address

Local IP subnet

Remote IP subnet

Auto policy settings

Life 3600 seconds

Encryption algorithm 3DES

SHA-1 integrity algorithm

Key Enable PFS group

DH-group 2 (1024 bits)

Headquarters - ISA550W

IPsec policy

Static IP address of remote Type

AUTH Type pre-shared Key

Local ID (empty)

Remote ID (empty)

IKE

SHA1 hash

Pre-shared Key

D0H group group 2 (1024 bits)

Lifetime 8 hours

Transform

integrity ESP_MD5_HMAC

Encryption ESP_3DES

Errors, I'm getting in the newspapers

Remote RV120W (note! I changed the external IP to protect the innocent!)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: respond to the negotiation of the new phase 2: 69.193.0.0 [0]<=>80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: configuration using IPsec SA: 192.168.3.0/24<->192.168.1.0/24

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: setting encmode 3 (3)-> Tunnel peer (1)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: proposal of the peer:

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (proto_id = spisize ESP = 4 spi = spi_p 8846693d = encmode = 00000000 Tunnel reqid = 0:0)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (trns_id = 3DES encklen = 0 authtype = hmac-md5)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: Local proposal:

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (proto_id = spisize ESP = 4 spi = 00000000 spi_p 00000000 encmode = Tunnel reqid = 5:5 =)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: (trns_id = 3DES encklen = 0 authtype = hmac-sha)

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] WARNING: proposal for Phase 2 of 80.4.0.0 [0] does not.

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: no adequate policy not found for 80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [NON-PROPOSITION-SELECTED]

2013-10-29 14:39:20: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: purged-with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi = c8d68f74af9dfa9a:b4137fd6e0666914 ISAKMP Security Association.

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: accept a request to establish IKE - SA: 80.4.0.0

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Configuration found for 80.4.0.0

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: opening new phase 1 negotiation: 69.193.0.0 [500]<=>80.4.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: Start Identity Protection mode.

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:180]: XXX: NUMNATTVENDORIDS: 3

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 4

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 8

2013-10-29 14:39:29: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: [ident_i1send:184]: XXX: definition of vendorid: 9

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: for 80.4.0.0 [500], version selected NAT - T: RFC 3947

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: payload NAT - D corresponds to 69.193.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for 80.4.0.0 [500]

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: PEER

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: for debugging: change ports2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: change port!

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for 69.193.0.0 [4500] - 80.4.0.0 [4500] with spi: 740e6a59f02eca3a:820460c448a5b74b

2013-10-29 14:39:30: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: prevent the load [INITIAL CONTACT]

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: new phase 2 negotiation: 69.193.0.0 [500]<=>80.4.0.0 [0]

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: setting encryption mode to use UDP encapsulation

2013-10-29 14:39:31: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:39:41: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:39:51: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:40:01: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Unknown notify message from the 80.4.0.0 [4500]. No found handful of phase2.

2013-10-29 14:40:02: [rv120w] [IKE] ERROR: Phase 2 negotiation failed due to upward. c8d68f74af9dfa9a:b4137fd6e0666914:f6cdeead

2013-10-29 14:40:02: [rv120w] [IKE] INFO: a calendar of undead has been removed: "quick_i1prep".

Head Office ISA550

2013-10-29 15:25:29 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4765: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:25:29 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4765: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:22:38 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4763: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:22:38 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4763: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:28 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4761: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:28 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = "PixelNY" #4761: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_MAIN_I1. No answer (or no acceptable answer) to our first post IKE. (pluto)

2013-10-29 15:20:12 - WARNING - Firewall: type = ACL

If someone could shed some light it would be fantastic!

Configuration items you listed, it's what I see. Transformations do not match between the AIS and the change integrity RV RV MD5 or change the game to transform ISA SHA1. I would recommend changing the ISA in well SHA1As, you don't mention what is IKE ISA policy encryption, but there's 3DES in the RV, so you'll need to ensure its 3DES in ISA. Also note that you are life spans SA do not match. Technically, this should be ok, but it's really best to match as well. The ISA is 8 hours and the RV is 1 hour (3600 seconds)

Shawn Eftink
CCNA/CCDA

Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

IPSec VPN between Cisco and ScreenOS

Hello

I'm trying to set up a simple IPSec VPN between a Cisco 2911 router and a Juniper Netscreen ScreenOS (not exactly now the model) device. Initially the debbuging seems good (QM_IDLE), but the ISAKMP Security Association is deleted.

The guy managing the Juniper device send me an extract from his diary:

###########################################################################

2012-08-28 10:24:16 info 00536 IKE Phase 2 msg ID System

9b 839579: negotiations failed.

2012-08-28 10:24:16 info system 00536 rejected a package of IKE loopback.11

of : 500 to

217.150.152.45:500 with cookies

87960e39d074ca49 and 9302d26c7ce324a5

because there is no acceptable Phase

2 proposals...

It has defined the following phase 2 proposals:

IKE the value p2-proposal "G2_esp_aes256_sha_1800s" group2 esp aes256-sha-1, 1800 second

###########################################################################

And I use these:

###########################################################################

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

BA aes 256

preshared authentication

Group 2

!

ISAKMP crypto key address 217.150.152.45

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp

Description * VPN Anbindung nach PKI in Magdeburg *.

defined by peer 217.150.152.45

define security-association life seconds 1800

the value of the transform-set esp - aes

match address PKI-TRAFFIC

!

###########################################################################

Here is my Log:

#################################################################################################################

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): profile of THE request is (NULL)

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 217.150.152.45, peer port 500

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: new position created post = 0x2A2D7150 peer_handle = 0x8000003A

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x2A2D7150, refcount 1 to peer isakmp_initiator

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 31627E04 = success

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): cannot start aggressive mode, try the main mode.

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-07 ID NAT - t

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built of NAT - T of the seller-03 ID

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): built the seller-02 ID NAT - t

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_I_MM1

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): Beginner Main Mode Exchange

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE

28 August 08:23:46.416: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM1 = IKE_I_MM2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 1

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: SHA hash

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: group by default 2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: keylength 256

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 1 0 x 51 0x80

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts: real life: 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): Acceptable atts:life: 0

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his vpi_length:4

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): fill atts in his life_in_seconds:86400

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): return real life: 86400

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): timer life Started: 86400.

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 239

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is DPD

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM2

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP

28 August 08:23:46.448: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.452: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM2 = IKE_I_MM3

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP (0): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_I_MM3 = IKE_I_MM4

28 August 08:23:46.484: ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM4

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): send initial contact

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): ITS been pre-shared key, using id ID_IPV4_ADDR type authentication

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID

next payload: 8

type: 1

address: 92.67.80.237

Protocol: 17

Port: 500

Length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): the total payload length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.508: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM4 = IKE_I_MM5

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): payload ID for treatment. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP (1049): payload ID

next payload: 8

type: 1

address: 217.150.152.45

Protocol: 17

Port: 500

Length: 12

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (0): peer games * no * profiles

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 0

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA authentication status:

authenticated

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): SA has been authenticated with 217.150.152.45

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: try inserting a peer /217.150.152.45/500/ and inserted 2A2D7150 successfully.

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM5 = IKE_I_MM6

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_I_MM6

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_I_MM6 = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.540: ISAKMP: (1049): start Quick Mode Exchange, M - ID of 1582159006

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): initiator QM gets spi

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entrance, node-1582159006 = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_I_QM1

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.552: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP (1049): received 217.150.152.45 packet dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set-452721455 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): HASH payload processing. Message ID =-452721455

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): treatment protocol NOTIFIER PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN 1

SPI 0, message ID =-452721455, his 0x31627E04 =

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): peer does not paranoid KeepAlive.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-452721455 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: node set 494253780 to QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): lot of 217.150.152.45 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): purge the node 494253780

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_DEST_SA

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): remove the reason for HIS "fatal Recevied of information' State (I) QM_IDLE (post 217.150.152.45)

Intertoys_Zentrale_Waddinxveen_01 #.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: Unlocking counterpart struct 0x2A2D7150 for isadb_mark_sa_deleted(), count 0

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 217.150.152.45: 2A2D7150

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): node-1582159006 error suppression FALSE reason 'IKE deleted.

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH

28 August 08:23:46.584: ISAKMP: (1049): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA

#################################################################################################################

Is there something special that needs to be addressed when creating a VPN for Juniper devices?

Greetings

Thomas

The peer IPSec a PFS enabled, do the same in your crypto-map:

card crypto ipsec vpn 2 isakmp

PFS group2 Set

--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

IPSEC VPN between Pix 515E and 1841 router

Hi all

BACKGROUND

We have implemented a site to site VPN IPSEC between a Pix 515E 8.0 operation (4) and an 1841 using static IP addresses at both ends. We used CCP on the router and the ASDM the pix to build initial tunnels. Now the site with the router is evolving into a dynamic IP address from the ISP so we have implemented dynamic DNS to update dynamic IP address.

PROBLEM

The problem is that ASDM will not allow us to set a domain as the address of peers, it will not accept an IP address. We believe that the solution will be to remove the static Crypto map and replace it with a dynamic Crypto map on the side of Pix. Our questions are simply; is this the best solution? can change us the original static list or is it better to delete and make a new dynamic encryption card? Y at - it a shortcut to change the config command-line? This is a real network, so just check it out before make us any changes on the live kit.

Any help much appreciated.

You don't have to change anything when the peer-address changes. The dynamic crypto map aims to take dynamic peer connections. The only thing to remember, is that only the dynamic peer can initiate the connection. And you reduce your security if you use Pre-Shared key that now you can use a generic-PSK character.

As I remember, the PIX / ASA does not support the dynamic use of FQDNs for peer-resolution. This feature is supported in IOS.

For a feature, it would be preferable to static IP addresses on both sides.

Site to Site VPN between 5510 and 5505

Am trying to get a VPN site-to site and the race between a branch office and our main office. I have the settings in place, but I'm trying to determine if it's my settings or the provider DSL, Verizon.

They have a 5505 with a static IP is connected by cable modem. Their 5505 I can ping external IP of my 5510 without problem. All the settings are correct on both sides; they reflect the same settings and yet static VPN is not launched.

Is there some sort of CLI command I must issue to bring it?

Also, I was wondering if maybe my 2821 prevents all VPN traffic because it doesn't have to be re - NAT'ed to the 192.168.250.0/23 and 192.168.252.0/24 subnets.

Simply to traffic of their 192.168.40.0 in our 192.168.250.0/23 VOIP subnet subnet.

Join a basic outline. I can provide the configs for almost everything

Hello

you have two instances of sequence card crypto with parameters similar (except transform set). Get rid of the rest of sequences card crypto:

On the ASA Satellite:

no card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap

no card crypto outside_map 2 set pfs

no card crypto outside_map 2 peers set smivpn.sorensonmedia.com

no card crypto outside_map 2 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

No crypto outside_map 2 set security-association life card seconds 28800

No kilobytes of life card crypto outside_map 2 set security-association 4608000

no card crypto outside_map 2 the value reverse-road

About the ASA company:

No crypto outside_map 1 game card address outside_1_cryptomap_1

no card crypto outside_map 1 set pfs

no card crypto outside_map 1 set cda.asa5505 counterpart

no card crypto outside_map 1 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

no card crypto outside_map 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800

No kilobytes of life card crypto outside_map 1 set security-association 4608000

no card crypto outside_map 1 the value reverse-road

Then check and capture debugs.

HTH

Sangaré

Impossible to establish a VPN between AG241 and WAG54GP2 tunnel

Hello

This is my first post on this forum and I send my best regards to everyone!

I signed up because I have a problem with establishing a VPN tunnel between an AG241 modem/router and a modem/router WAG54GP2 with wireless and VoIP.

The scenario is simple: both ends have dynamic IP, so I set up an account with dyndns.org for both routers.

WAG54GP2 has 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 AG241 has 192.168.3.254/255.255.255.0 IP and IP.

In both routers, I turned block anonymous internet requests, so I can ping both routers.

This is the configuration of WAG54GP2:

VPN Passthrough
IPSec PassThrough: activate
Intercommunication PPPoE: activate
PPTP PassThrough: enable
L2TP PassThrough: enable

IPSec VPN tunnel
Select the Tunnel: 1
VPN IPSec tunnel: enabled
Tunnel name: Office

Local security group:
Subnet
IP: 192.168.1.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0

Local security gateway: PVC 1 (ppp0)

Remote secure group:
IP: 192.168.3.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0

Remote security gateway:
IP Addr.
The remote router's public IP address IP address: w.x.y.z.
Encryption: THE (I also tried 3DES and disabled)
Authentication: SHA

Key management:
Auto. (IKE)
PFS: enabled
Pre-shared Key: the password I chose
Life key: 3600 Sec.

Advanced settings

Phase 1
Mode of operation: main mode (I also tried aggressive mode)

Proposal1
Encryption: A
Authentication: SHA
Group: 768 bits
Life key: 3600 sec.

Proposition2
Encryption: ESP_NULL
Authentication: SHA
Group: 768 bits
Life key: 3600 sec.

Another parameter
NAT traversal not verified
NetBIOS broadcast Checked
Anti-reponse not checked
Keep-Alive not verified
If IKE 5 times failedmore
Not checked

This is the AG241 configuration:

VPN Passthrough
IPSec PassThrough: activate
Intercommunication PPPoE: activate
PPTP PassThrough: enable
L2TP PassThrough: enable

IPSec VPN tunnel
Select the Tunnel: 1
VPN IPSec tunnel: enabled
Name of the tunnel: user 1

Local security group:
Subnet
IP: 192.168.3.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0

Local security gateway: PVC 1 (ppp0)

Remote secure group:
IP: 192.168.1.0
Mask: 255.255.255.0

Remote security gateway:
Any

Key management:
Auto. (IKE)
PFS: enabled
Pre-shared Key: the same password I put on the WAG54GP2
Life key: 3600 Sec.

Advanced settings

Phase 1
Mode of operation: main mode (I also tried aggressive mode)

Proposal1
Encryption: A
Authentication: SHA
Group: 768 bits
Life key: 3600 sec.

Proposition2
Encryption: A
Authentication: SHA
Group: 768 bits
Life key: 3600 sec.

Another parameter
NAT traversal not verified
NetBIOS broadcast Checked
Anti-reponse not checked
Keep-Alive not verified
If IKE 5 times failedmore
Not checked

When I click on Connect the WAG54GP2 router, do not access and in the newspapers, I see:

2009 07-30 T 16: 16:10 + 01:00 IKE ["Board"] Tx > MM_I1: SA w.x.y.z.

2009 07-30 T 16: 16:20 + 01:00 IKE ["Board"] ERROR: message w.x.y.z. port 500: connection refused

If I use the dynamic FQDN instead of the dynamic IP (w.x.y.z.) change of message for:

2009 07-30 T 16: 46:16 + 01:00 IKE ["Board"] ERROR: problem of remote domain name Security Gateway!

Is there someone who could help me build this tunnel?

A big thank you to everyone who will help me!

Cinghiuz

If you are Encountering difficulties connecting to the VPN Tunnel using a router ADSL modem you should see this

Also, make sure that you have the latest firmware installed on your entry door and change the MTU setting...

VPN between Cisco and Check Point problem

Guys,

I have problems to establish a vpn site-to-site between a Cisco 3660 e router tunnel a firewall checkpoint NG AI R55.

In the SiteA is an environment with a Cisco 3660 router using the following configurations:

crypto ISAKMP policy 1

md5 hash

preshared authentication

Group 2

life 86400

!

ISAKMP crypto key [removed] address 172.17.10.111

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac serasa

!

Serasa 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined by peer 172.17.10.111

Set transform-set serasa

match address 101

!

interface Serial5/4

bandwidth 64

IP 192.168.163.6 255.255.255.252

no ip unreachable

No cdp enable

card crypto serasa

!

IP route 10.12.0.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

IP route 172.17.10.111 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

IP route 172.17.10.155 255.255.255.255 192.168.163.5

!

access-list 101 permit tcp 172.248.7.200 host 10.12.0.0 0.0.255.255 eq 3315

In the SiteB, we have an environment highly available Nokia using VRRP.

The IP address configured as a cluster in the Control Point is 172.17.10.111.

We have already confirmed all the configurations of the phase 1 and 2 and is OK, but the VPN is not established.

The following messages appear in the router and the firewall:

ROUTER

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): check IPSec 1 proposal

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: turn 1 ESP_DES

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: attributes of transformation:

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: program is 1

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: life of HIS (basic) 3600

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: type of life in kilobytes

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: service life of SA (IPV) 0x0 0 x 46 0 50 x 0 x 0

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: authenticator is HMAC-MD5

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): atts are acceptable.

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_proposal_request): part #1 of the proposal

(Eng. msg key.) Local INCOMING = 192.168.163.6, distance = 172.17.10.111,.

local_proxy = 172.248.7.200/255.255.255.255/0/0 (type = 1),

remote_proxy = 10.12.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

Protocol = ESP, transform = esp - esp-md5-hmac.

lifedur = 0 and 0kb in

SPI = 0 x 0 (0), id_conn = 0, keysize = 0, flags = 0 x 2

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (kei_proxy): head = serasa, card-> ivrf =, kei-> ivrf =

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: IPSEC (validate_transform_proposal): proxy unsupported identities

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): IPSec policy invalidated proposal

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): politics of ITS phase 2 is not acceptable! (local 192.168.163.6 remote 172.17.10.111)

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP: node set 2114856837 to QM_IDLE

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): lot of 200.245.207.111 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): purge the node 2114856837

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: ISAKMP (0:252): unknown entry for node-528822595: State = IKE_QM_I_QM1, large = 0x00000001, minor = 0x0000000C

June 15 at 10:39:24 orbital: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_MODE_FAILURE: fast processing mode failed with the peer to 172.17.10.111

FIREWALL

IKE: Main Mode has received Notification of peers: first Contact

IKE: Completion of Main Mode.

IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

IKE: Quick Mode has received Notification of the counterpart: no proposal chosen

IKE: Exchanging information received remove peer IKE - SA:

Anyone have idea who might be the problem?

Thank you very much for the help.

Fabiano Mendonca.

Cool. pls mark as resolved if that might help others... the rate of responses if deemed useful...

REDA

VPN between PIX with dynamic IP

Can I make a VPN over the Internet with PIX or IOS VPN in each IP address dynamic and extreme (DHCP client) in the two extremes?

Thank you

If siempre sepas than las direcciones los extremos back there sets in el momento iniciar el tunel in peripheral los.

Distinto are TR UN extremo tiene IP fija y el otro dinamica (vpn easy for example you can help ahi)

--

Alexis Fidalgo

Systems engineer

AT & T Argentina

Cisco VPN client, PIX, and proxy

Hi.I have problem in my company. We have users that go through a proxy server located in the DMZ of a PIX to the internet (allowed through the ACL of the DMZ on the outside, etc.). Which works very well.

The problem arises when they use a Cisco VPN client to connect to another company, and they can no longer access the Internet, but may work via VPN to a remote site (client has been authorized by the Cisco PIX). Everything returns to normal when they no longer use the VPN client.

Any ideas why this would happen?

Without the proxy, browsing the internet via the vpn connection, or split tunnel is configured and you are leaving locally. If split tunnel is configured, the ip address of proxy server can overlap with the remote protected network.

Fortunately, it is easy for you to know how the vpn is configured, just check the route details of vpn client statistics tab.

Verify that the routing table local pc will also help you to solve this problem.

VPN between PIX and ASA

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for