VPN out 2 ISP - no failover Bgp - Multihome -.

Similar Questions

• BGP multihomed with HSRP

  Hello

  Is it possible with elegance the convergent eBGP neighbor stopped to the other CE router connection with zero drop package or power failure?

  We have 2 CES linked together using iBGP and eBGP that both connect to the different EPP but on the same you.

  CE1-> PPE1 - AS12345

  iBGP and HSRP between these

  CE2-> PPE2 - AS12345

  I tried using the command ' neighbor 10.10.10.10 stop ' but I have a blackout for a few seconds.

  Thank you

  Hello

  Latest IOSes are supported a feature called BGP soft stop that is described here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/iOS-XML/iOS/iproute_bgp/configuration/XE-3s/IRG-XE-3s-book/configuring_bgp_graceful_shutdown.html

  You might be interested in checking if this device can be used on your devices.

  In general, however, a phasing out of a neighbour in BGP usually is possible in making sure these routers stop to consider the routes learned from each other as usable routes before going down. This can be done in several ways in BGP - change local preference in iBGP, changing the MED or, better, the AS_PATH in eBGP, filtering the routes so marked with a specific Community (progressive shutdown of BGP relies on the use of a specific community to do it this way).

  HSRP is out of the question - its placement is to end hosts, not between routers.

  Best regards
  Peter

• Simple IOS VPN IPsec HUB and Spoke failover HUB

  Hi all

  I have a nd architecture VPN Hub spoke with Asit, IKEv1 and IPsec.

  My hub is connected to a single service provider.

  I wish I had a hardware redundancy for my hub.

  Instead of creating a double tunnel in each Department, I would like to use my router 4000ISR failover protocol.

  Is it possible to simply achieve?

  If I use IOS IPsec failover that I need to deploy my changes on the two router or (such as ASA) I can set the active router and allow the watch to receive the chenges?

  Thanks to you all.

  Johnny

  If your ISP connection is one that has a routed block and you can connect two routers same in it, you can then configure HSRP.

  The source of the Tunnel becomes the HSRP address.  Rays may not know that there are two routers.

  Easy failover.

  Alternatively, you can have a single tunnel with hubs double (if you do not use HSRP).  You don't have to borrow the double tunnels.

• VPN on several ISP load balancing

  Hi all

  Please explaing on VPN load balancing based on a scenario where two Internet service providers are here. How can I configure vpn balance in such a scenario?

  Thank you

  Shijo.

  Hi Shijo

  What type of VPN connections you want to balance the load? VPN remote access right? You can essentially set up a cluster within your VPN to load device balanced local traffic, passing through the same ISP... but for a scenario with 2 different ISPS, this may seem a bit difficult... Just because of the fact that your vpn device will have two different IPs on the outer side and have to finish on two different interfaces... tracking and grouping two interfaces are difficult..., your VPN clients will point to a single IP address on the part of ISPS, and virtual IPs have in this case is difficult...

  Hope this helps... good luck...

  REDA

• Unable to access the local network with VPN with some ISPS

  Hello

  We have a VPN Remote Access IPSEC with an ASA5505. Install VPN it correctly but can not access the inside or the ASA to my office.

  But at home with another Internet service provider, it works! You can access inside.

  We are trying with other ISP and it works with 2 and does not work with the other 2!

  Office we also have an ASA5505, but we have another VPN other sites that work properly.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you and sorry for my English.

  Add...

  ISAKMP nat-traversal crypto

  That should do the trick! Please rate if this can help.

• IPsec VPN with 2 ISP on a single backup endpoint router

  I have the following configuration setup:

  Cisco 1811 (router Client)

  FA0 - network internal 192.168.0.0/24

  SA1 - connection of ISPS, we'll call it 1.1.1.1

  FA2 - Vlan 800

  VLAN 800 - secondary ISP connection, we'll call it 2.2.2.2

  ASA 5580 running 8.2

  Outside of the interface we will call 3.3.3.3

  crypto map set 5 peer 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2

  crypto 5 game card address test_network

  I have a tunnel-group defined for 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2

  Now for the question. I have the setup of 1811 with SLA monitoring. I use a default road map to ensure that the ICMP out Fa1 continuously and I have followed the default route with this. I have a route weighted 250 floating default pointing to the ISP of backup.

  While the two networks are available, I can create the tunnel using the ISP to 3.3.3.3 (of 1.1.1.1). I can ping through the tunnel without end. I can then simulate a failure of the ISP and will give the blow the way secondary. I ping through the tunnel again, and on the ASA, I see that a new ISAKMP connection has been set up. Looking on the 1811, I see isakmp QM_IDLE connections (2).

  While the main link does not work, I can still ping through the tunnel without end. The primary session isakmp on the 1811 falls never turned off, but on the ASA, in fact get deleted. The ASA has only a connection made to 2.2.2.2. Once the primary link retrieves and the default route is back to the first ISP connection, the tunnel never recovers. The ASA appears to think that the secondary ISP is still the active connection and routing does not work in the tunnel as the 1811 tries to send data to the ISP.

  Is there a way to do the following:

  -When the ISP main breaks down on the 1811, the established tunnel is cancelled

  -When the main ISPS back upward on the 1811, the SAA can re-establish the connection by using the primary link (or the backup on the 1811 tunnel is disconnected)?

  Is it still possible to do on a single router (2 links ISP) or it can be done using 2 routers?

  I would like to know if I need to explain a little better or if the configuration details are needed.

  Thank you!

  Jeff

  Jeffrey,

  In having followed IP SLA on the 1811, as soon as the track is down, the second tunnel should be established. (this also means that, by enabling KeepAlive on both ends, they should note that the main tunnel is not active and bring both ends).

  The KeepAlive will constantly monitor the health of the other peer, so this should help you to these two questions.

  Federico.

• VPN on 2nd ISP

  ASA5505 with 2 ISP. Want general Internet default ISP (outdoors). Want VPN site-to-site on 2nd ISP. Base license, so I use a 'no before. I think I'm close, but I just can't get my VPN test to negotiate - don't see any attempt even when I ping to generate interesting traffic on another. Switching to 'surf' of isps1 to ISP2 works very well. Attached config. Thanks in advance.

  You also need the following route:

  route VPN 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 yy.yy.yy.1 1

  route VPN 10.13.1.0 255.255.255.0 yy.yy.yy.1 1

  route VPN 10.14.1.0 255.255.255.0 yy.yy.yy.1 1

  route VPN 10.15.1.0 255.255.255.0 yy.yy.yy.1 1

• ASA Vpn load balancing and failover

  Hi all.

  We have two asa5520 configured as main unit and emergency in failover configuration, and everything works fine.

  Is it possible with this configuration (switch), configure the vpn load balancing/grouping?

  Thank you

  Daniele

  Hi Daniele,

  You cannot run two of them on two firewalls ASA, VPN feature load balancing or failover functionality.

  Where you need to use the two feature, you must use more than three ASA firewall, two first ASAs will work as the failover and the ASA third will work as cluster VPN for them, the following example uses four firewalls:

  ASA1 (active FO) - ASA2 (TF Standby)

  (VPN virtual master)

  |

  |

  |

  |

  (Backup VPN device)

  ASA3 (active FO) - ASA4 (TF Standby)

  Kind regards

  Wajih

• Creating remote VPN redundancy with 2 ISPS on ASA 8.3 running

  Hello

  I need help in implementing connection remote VPN with two ISPs (redundancy), so that the remote VPN client will be only one connection, but two ISPS will be linked to another.

  I can do it on previous IOS, but things have changed in ASA 8.3, please help.

  Hello

  If you follow the post, you will find that the "tunnel-group" is a global command that is not set to a specific interface.

  Basically, must be added the card encryption even for two interfaces, as follows:

  backup_map interface card crypto outside

  backup of crypto backup_map interface card

  crypto ISAKMP allow outside

  ISAKMP crypto enable backup

  The only difference is related to the statements of NAT, reason why I included the pre - NAT post in my previous note.

  Thank you.

• VPN LAN - to - LAN ASA of the multiple Interfaces

  I have an ASA connected to 2 ISPs.I am on tracking object for the path of route 1 so only default is used at a time. I have a configuration VPN L2L out a interface. I would like to set up a 2nd VPN out interface B with identical settings.

  Is this possible?

  (Software ASA 8.2)

  card crypto PATH_A 1 corresponds to the address outside_1_cryptomap

  card crypto PATH_A 1 peer set 10.1.1.1

  card crypto PATH_A 1 set transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA

  card crypto PATH_A 1 set security-association second life 28800

  card crypto PATH_A 1 set security-association kilobytes of life 4608000

  card crypto PATH_A 1 set reverse-road

  crypto PATH_A OUTSIDE_A map interface

  card crypto PATH_B 100 corresponds to the address outside_1_cryptomap

  card crypto PATH_B 100 peer set 10.1.1.1

  card crypto PATH_B 100 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA

  card crypto PATH_B 100 set security-association second life 28800

  card crypto PATH_B 100 set security-association kilobytes of life 4608000

  card crypto PATH_B 100 set reverse-road

  crypto PATH_B OUTSIDE_B map interface

  !

  !

  ISAKMP crypto enable OUTSIDE_A

  ISAKMP crypto enable OUTSIDE_B

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  preshared authentication

  aes encryption

  sha hash

  Group 2

  life 86400

  tunnel-group 10.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group 10.1.1.1 General attributes

  Group Policy - by default-MY-VPN

  tunnel-group 10.1.1.1 ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared key 123456

  !

  internal group MY - VPN strategy

  MY - VPN group policy attributes

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Hi Bill

  This is possible, but add the same card encryption both of the inetrfaces

  crypto PATH_A OUTSIDE_A map interface

  crypto PATH_A OUTSIDE_B map interface

  and he is not allowed to use the reverse route command.

  You need to reach, but also "floating conn timeout 0:01:00.

  I used an internet connection for the site to site vpn and the other for all other traffic (default route). All routes taken with ip sla.

  I did it with 8.6

• How to create vpn with vista home premium on basis of vpn xp settings?

  I can connect to the vpn with xp machine, but when I try to imitate xp setting with machine to vista Home premium I can't connect to the same vpn. What do you suggest me?

  How to create a vpn connection in Vista: http://techrepublic.com.com/2346-1035_11-61437-1.html?tag=content;leftCol.  NOTE: I don't know what you mean "based" vpn xp settings, but you will have to do the best you can with the options and settings available in Vista (that I n "' t know how they compare to XP, but I hope that you will be able to do so because).

  Here is another article on the procedure: http://www.publicvpn.com/support/Vista.php.

  Here is an article on how configure a VPN with an ISP in Vista: http://www.web-articles.info/e/a/title/How-to-create-a-VPN-connection-over-your-ISP-connection/.

  Here is an article with a number of different other items all on vpn in Vista (I don't know exactly what type of configuration you "AVIC - as a host, as a customer, on what type of connection,--but this article covers many different aspects and I hope that at least a couple will be a help for you: http://compnetworking.about.com/od/vpnsetup/VPN_Setup_How_to_Set_Up_a_VPN.htm.)

  I hope this helps.

  Good luck!

  Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• XDA (PDA) Cisco VPN client

  My company executives want to use their PDA/Mobile phone (they use race I I-Mate PocketPC 2003) to connect to the internal company Exchange Server (which is synchronize your emails on the PDA with the exchange server). I think that the way to proceed would be via a VPN connection to perimeter PIX 515ER fw. The problem is that I don't think that (PocketPC 2K 3) integrated VPN client is not compatible with the way that the PIX IPSec authentication. This is the PIX will authenticate first based on the group, then (if enabled) XAuth and finally authentication field MS (which is not PIX but the authentication of the client). Anyone know of a client VPN out there (for PDA) compatible with the way as PIX IPSec authentication? Thanks for your reply.

  For more information about the supported for the PocketPC VPN client, please see the following link.

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/cc/so/NESO/sqso/CSAP/certi_rg.htm

• Redundancy with double tis on cisco ASA VPN Site to Site

  Dear supporters,

  Could you help me to provide a configuration for the network as an attachment diagram.

  I am suitable with your help.

  Thank you

  Best regards

  Hi Sothengse,

  You can visit the below link and configure ASA @ head and Canes accordingly to your condition.

  You must change the configuration of the similar example with ends... Double TIS @ ends in your scenario...

  http://networkology.NET/2013/03/08/site-to-site-VPN-with-dual-ISP-for-BA...

  I hope this helps.

  Concerning

  Knockaert

• ACL and anyconnect ssl vpn

  Hello world

  I was testing the few things at my lab at home.

  PC - running ssl vpn - sw - router - ISP - ASA (anyconnect ssl)

  AnyConnect ssl works very well and I am also able to access the internet.

  I use full tunnel

  I have ACLs on the external interface of the ASA

  1

  True

  any

  any

  intellectual property

  Deny

  0

  By default

  []

  I know that the ACL is used to traffic passing by ASA.

  I need to understand the flow of traffic for internet via ssl vpn access. ?

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  As you correctly say, the ACL interface is not important for that because the VPN traffic is not inspected by the ACL. Of the at least not by default.

  You can control the traffic with a different ACL that is applied to the group policy with the command "vpn-filter". And of course you need a NAT rule that translates your traffic when running to the internet. This rule should work on the pair of interface (outside, outside).

• ASA 5510 VPN multiple tunnels through different interfaces

  Is it possible to create VPN tunnels on more than one interface to an ASA (specifically 5510 with 8.4), or I'm doing the impossible?

  We have 2 public interfaces on our ASA connected to 2 different suppliers.

  We must work L2L tunnels of the SAA for remote offices through the interface that is our ISP 'primary' and also used as our default gateway for internet traffic.

  We are trying to install a remote office use our secondary connection for its tunnel (office of high traffic we would prefer separate away from the rest of our internet and VPN traffic).

  I can create the tunnel with the ACL appropriate for traffic tunnel, card crypto, etc., put in place a static route to force ASA to use the secondary interface for traffic destined for the public of the remote gateway IP address, and when I finished, traffic initiated by the remote site will cause the tunnel to negotiate and find - I can see the tunnel in Show crypto ikev1 his as L2L answering machine MM_ACTIVE , Show ipsec his with the right destination and correct traffic local or remote identities for interesting, but the ASA local never tries to send traffic through the tunnel.  If I use tracers of package, it never shows a VPN that is involved in the trafficking of the headquarters in the remote desktop, as if the SAA is not seeing this as for the corresponding VPN tunnel traffic.

  If I take the exact same access and crypo card statements list and change them to use the primary ISP connection (and, of course, change the remote desktop IP connects to), then the connection works as expected.

  What Miss me?

  Here is a sample of the VPN configuration: (PUBLIC_B is our second ISP link, 192.168.0.0/23 is MainOffice 192.168.3.0/24 is FieldOffice)

  permit access list range 192.168.0.0 PUBLIC_B_map 255.255.254.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (Inside, PUBLIC_B) static source MainOffice MainOffice static FieldOffice FieldOffice

  card crypto PUBLIC_B_map 10 corresponds to the address PUBLIC_B_map

  card crypto PUBLIC_B_map 10 set counterpart x.x.x.x

  card crypto PUBLIC_B_map 10 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA ikev1

  PUBLIC_B_map PUBLIC_B crypto map interface

  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x

  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.

  Route PUBLIC_B x.x.x.32 255.255.255.224 y.y.y.y 1

  If I take this same exact configuration and change it to use PUBLIC (our primary connection) instead of PUBLIC_B, remove the instruction PUBLIC_B route and change the desktop to point to the ip address of the PUBLIC, then everything works, so my access list and crypto map statements must be correct.

  What I don't understand is why the ASA Head Office does not seem to recognize interesting for the tunnel traffic when the tunnel is for the second ISP connection, but works when it is intended for the main ISP.  There is no problem of connectivity with the ISP Internet B - as mentioned previously, the tunnel will come and negotiate properly when traffic is started from the desktop, but the traffic of main office is never sent to the bottom of the tunnel - it's as if the ASA does not think that traffic of 192.168.0.x to 192.168.3.x should pass through the VPN.

  Any ideas?

  Hello

  I think your problem is that there is no route for the actual remote network behind the VPN L2L through ISP B connection

  You could try adding add the following configuration

  card crypto PUBLIC_B_map 10 the value reverse-road

  This should automatically add a static route for all remote networks that are configured in the ACL Crypto, through the interface/link-ISP B.

  If this does not work, you can try to manually add a static route to the ISP B link/interface for all remote networks VPN L2L in question, and then try again.

  The route to the remote VPN peer through the ISP B does not to my knowledge.

  I would like to know if it works for you.

  It may be useful

  -Jouni