1 TB SAS 7.2 K vs 1 TB SATA 7.2 K (DELL MD3000i)

Similar Questions

• PE R510 of the SAS addition to the installed system with SATA drives

  Hello

  We have a server PE510 that came with 2 drives 2 TB SATA 7.2 k and a Controller PERC SAS 6/iR.   The servers of the machine as a SQL server (its original purpose) and later on, a busy file server.  The file server role was not originally intended for this machine.  What we are seeing is very bad I/O bottleneck during daily use, although only about a dozen people access to this server.   (I got the system extracted by pressing more than once).

  I wonder if replace drives with SAS will help solve this problem.  There are 6 empty bays on the system.

  Would I be able to add 3-6 SAS disks to this system (in addition to the installed SATA disks), in order to create a new RAID volume and move the files to it on SATA volumes?   The existing SATA drives are in a RAID1 volume.

  Thank you

  Thank you

  Mauricej74

  I wonder if replace drives with SAS will help solve this problem.  There are 6 empty bays on the system.

  Replacement by SAS will probably help, but your bottleneck is your controller, not your type of disc.  There is no easy way to migrate a Windows installation of a SAS 6/iR to a PERC 6 / i, but if you were to move the PERC, you will see a substantial improvement.  The other problem is that, because you can not mix SAS and SATA disks in a virtual disk, you would have to do a backup/restore for the SAS VD (you would not be able to rebuild a SAS drive in the existing table to replace one at a time).

  Mauricej74

  Would I be able to add 3-6 SAS disks to this system (in addition to the installed SATA disks), in order to create a new RAID volume and move the files to it on SATA volumes?

  Yes, you can add the SAS drives for the system and more SATA drives.  Note, however, that 1) the SAS 6/iR controller only supports 2 virtual drives, while a VD can be added, and 2) the SAS 6/iR controller only supports RAID 0 and 1, would be so the only way to add disks "3-6" in a RAID 0, which leaves your data at extreme risk.

• T7610 SAS (LSI 2308) precision controller - set the SATA drives?

  Hello

  The controller is SAS RAID LSI 2308 integrated in the T7610 of precision allows to attach SATA hard drives in a non-raid configuration?  I just realized this system has only TWO internal SATA connectors, but I need THREE internal SATA drives.

  What I was asking is if the SAS ports will allow the connection of SATA drives that are not used in RAID mode?  This way I can add my 3rd SATA HDD to a SAS ports.

  Thank you
  M

  We are experiencing the same problem/issue with the T7610 of accuracy by using the controller LSI-2308.  The end result that we would like is to have 2 drives separated - do not use the raid controller.  However, the CD Rom takes up one of the sata drive connections.

  Anyone been able to disable the raid and then controller, seeing the disks during the installation of windows needs to see?

  Currently, I have 2 blank drives (3 TB (ea.) and windows setup does not see the discs - but the raid controller load very well through the configuration.

  What should I do to get readers in windows?  There the meta that needs to be removed?

• Buy list HCL SATA or SAS SSD?  Why the consumer grade SATA SSD are meaningless.

  Hello

  I run a node 4 VSAN 6 Cluster with a LSI SAS in Raid-0 Mode controller listed HCL (a 975 queue depth) to which I currently attached: 3 x 10 k SAS Enterprise RPM hard drives and 1 x Samsung 850 SATA Pro 512 GB SSD. The nodes are the same.

  These SSD is due to budgetary constraints. I too put in service the SSD 512 GB to 400 GB and they seem to controllers and BIOS as 400GO devices.

  Performance is horrible. Overall, VM feel morose.

  When you make a copy of a file of DVD ISO file (say 3GB) on one virtual computer to another, I get extremely high 100 MS to 300ms or even higher disk latencies on both virtual machines. When a regeneration occurs because I take a node in Maint.mode with 'full datamigration', or I re - apply a strategy of backup to say "band bandwidth 2" to "stripe-width 3", the whole cluster crushed essentially to a halt. " VM has become so slow and on Linux VM I get same kernel-messages on scsi timeouts, etc. None of the work of the virtual machine, they freeze and basically die because "the disc is extremely unresponsive.

  I'm not alone in this. I have read many similar stories on the net and it often comes down to the 'consumer grade SATA SSD' who these Samsungs are after all.

  I guess I have the same problem.

  My question is this: I have the right to replace the Samsung 850 Pro with either a SAS disk SSD Sandisk which is listed HCL * or * using Intel DC S3700 SATA SSD that are also in the HCL currently for 6 VSAN.

  What I don't understand is: ' if the SATA SSD that I use currently, form a bottleneck due to the depth of the SATA Interface of 32 queue, how can we * all * SATA SSD be on the HCL at all?

  I doubt that these Intel DC S3700 are much faster than the Samsung 850 Pro and they are two SATA drives and they both have a personal 32 queuedepth and all the interface SATA has a 32 port queuedepth pro. So how can disks SATA works in a system of VSAN. I just makes no sense.

  Everyone is to fight to death on "queue-depth queue depth queue depth. Cormac Hogan, Duncan Epping, everyone who is an authority on VSAN. A queue-depth too low controllers were thrown out of the HCL etc etc etc

  When I look at the SSD Intel S3700 HCL wrote:

  Mandatory features:

  Drive performance, disc reliability, queue depth, SMART SATA Surprise Power Removal, trim attributes / Unmap, Cache write, write the NDR

  It says "tail-depth" as one of the requirements that responds to this SDS. But SATA, by definition, has a maximum queue-depth 32 which is much too small. So, how can it meet "tail-depth"? It is SATA!

  The Intel DC S3700 would cost me about half of the money the SAS SSD Sandisk and of course, if Intel is going to solve my problems of performance, then I'll take those. But if I'm just as much trouble afterwards because of the queue depth of the SATA Interface of 32, then I better invest in the SAS SSD (but which could exhaust my budget for other things so I'd rather not).

  Anyone can shed some light on this?

  (edit: I changed the title to better reflect my findings)

  Update: I bit the bullit, obtained a second mortgage, said my child may not be able to go to College and I bought the SAS SSD (Sandisk 200 GB 6 G SAS). In each of the four nodes, I did a complete data migration, replaced the Samsung 850 Pro SATA SSD with the SSD SAS and macaroni holy, all my problems disappeared.

  The whole system feels much more receptive and do things like clone a virtual machine (which would grind the whole cluster to stop) never stops working like nothing happens.

  Before, when I did a simple copy of an ISO to a virtual computer DVD file to another, I would like to get, maybe, 20 MB/s and the entire cluster has started feeling lethargic until the copy job is completed. Now, I get speeds ranging from 80 to 90 MB/s and so bright and responsive.

  What a difference!

  I'm a very happy man.

  Moreover, my network is a 1 Gbps where each node has two NIC in a LACP LAG and I can clearly see a node to talk to another network node 1 NIC and talk to another node on the other card NETWORK LACP nicely splits the traffic on the two cards.

  The system feels so fast now and reconstructions / present a new application of storage policies is difficult to have an impact, and generally occur much more quickly than before.

  And really, the only thing I did was swap the Samsung 850 Pro SATA SSD with these SAS SSD.

  Lesson learned: either pay the money of the SAS SSD (which are on the HCL, of course) who is the best, or get certified company VSAN grade SATA SSD but STAY AWAY to consumers rank of SATA SSD because they do not have what it takes. They cannot empty their queues fast enough and all clutter as soon as there is a bit of the system load.

  Just don't do it. Forget the consumer SATA rank. It's like throwing money down the toilet. I've been there and I learned the hard way. Let me be the stubborn donkey, so you don't ;-)

• SAS bays for SATA drives

  Is it possible to put SATA drives in the SAS bays and connect them to the SATA ports?

  Thank you

  Rimokatolik, your simple answer is 'yes '.  SATA drives may be plugged into the connectors SAS the Z800 and later Z8xx series workstations.  This means that the cables of the drive Bay are connected on the SAS (white) connectors on the bottom edge of the motherboard.  Small connects the SATA drives to the SAS controller.  SAS controller works with SATA drives, so you don't have to move cables to the SATA ports to make the SATA disks to work.

  However, if you wish, you can connect the wiring existing SAS to SATA ports on the motherboard and put the SATA drives into the drive bays.

• SyncRep between SAS and SATA pools

  Hello

  I know it works as I have it configured. The performance of SAS volumes will not be affected by SATA. I know that writing is not recognized until the page is in the two pools but as the SATA table is slower than what will happen. I guess that the latency will increase?

  IOPS / s wise, it could be close (partially depends on if you have 12 or 24 15 k drives in this 6100XV), but wise as the SATA drives would still slow down you the search time.

  When you perform a synchronous replication (from any SAN provider) you really want the same type of raid, the same discs, same number of readers or your performance will be slower car and raid type.

• SAS 6iR not recognizing disc Hitachi hard, SAS

  I recently installed a 6iR SAS in a R200 with 2 disks SATA not searched. I can boot from the primary drive without problem, but the secondary is on its way. Both are running on the new controller that uses v06.22.03 BIOS.

  I have now swapped the two disks SATA 2 wiping Hitachi SAS 450 GB 15 k disks (HUS156045VLS600) and uses the same cable. During the boot process by using CTRL-C to enter the SAS set up, I chose to set up a raid 1 type using both disks. However when I develop the topography I can see the controller with two connected drives, but both discs are marked as Wrg Type.

  Is there something I did wrong in the development of these readers, or they are not compatible with the SAS controller?

  What I see in the configuration utility is the following;

  Adapter PCI PCI PCI FW revision state Boot
  Order of bus Dev FNC
  ------- --- --- --- -----------    ------ -----
  01 00 00 0.25.47.00 - 0 active IR SAS6IR

  If I press on enter and select raid properties > volume create R1 I can see;

  Ability to review HBA ID Lun supplier products
  --- -- --- ------- ------------------ --------   --------
  2 4 0 NA00 X 411-HVIPC420A15 NETAPP
  2 5 0 NA00 X 411-HVIPC420A15 NETAPP
  LSI Logic SAS1068E-IR 0.25.47.00 NV 20:09 2

  On another view, I see;

  Create table SAS1068E
  Type of array Raid1 (IM)
  Table size (MB)

  Slot machine Hot Drv
  NUM identifier Raid RPD m Dev
  ---- ------ ------------------ ---- --- ---
  4 X 411-HVIPC420A15 NETAPP NO NO. WRG TYPE
  5 X 411-HVIPC420A15 NETAPP NO NO. WRG TYPE

  Checking physical properties I see that two devices;

  4 Physics (PHYS 8 5th)
  SAS 4 port
  link to m compatible 3.0 Gbps
  State of discovery 000000000
  Dev id NETAPP X 411 - HVIPC420A15
  Order analysis 4
  Info dev SAS
  SAS address 5000 CCA0:18386655

  5 Physics (6th of 8 PHYS)
  SAS Port 5
  link to m compatible 3.0 Gbps
  State of discovery 000000000
  Dev id NETAPP X 411 - HVIPC420A15
  Analysis of order 5
  Info dev SAS
  SAS address 5000 CCA0:18458229

  There is no other devices on ports SAS 0-3, 6 and 7.

  I can't change anything using the C option to set up the raid. If I simply continue the boot sequence, it ends with;

  Boot ROM, no device supported find MPT of Dell Inc.

  Have I plugged the drives on the wrong connector? Wouldn't be the pale connector instead of black?

  It seems that these Hitachi drives have firmware for use in Netapp systems only. Hitachi provide no firmware to change to be recognized by other controllers.

  Looks like they go back at the end on eBay, I've now replaced by WD RE drives that the controller seems to have no problem with.

• Oracle Secure backup can run on SAS on an IBM autoloader model TS interface

  We would like to use secure backup of Oracle with SAS interface on a IBM autoloader model TS-2900. Could not configure the secure backup of oracle with SAS interface?
  
  
  
  Your answer will be highly appreciated.
  
  
  
  
  ROMEL Dela Fuente
  
  Published by: 922644 on March 23, 2012 02:28
  
  Published by: 922644 on March 28, 2012 12:25

  Action of the host:
  This message was originally placed in the General Storage Discussion.
  It's a hardware oriented forum for discussions on specific hardware storage products and their use/admiinistration.

  OSB appears to be more involved in the company database applications:
  http://www.Oracle.com/us/products/database/secure-backup/Overview/index.html
  If it is moved to the forum Secure Backup, if all goes well for the reconciliation of the subject.

• 8770w and ssd

  Hello, I 8770w mobile workstation Ly562et and I want to spend my hard drive. I am looking for SSDS. I work in Autodesk Inventor, Autodesk 3d Studio max, I can buy Hp sas Mo0800fbrwd 632430-003 800 GB ssd sata III, but I didn't know if is good for my machine or what recommend you for me? Sas fester then ssd SSD is normal? My hhd is a hybrid right now. If I buy ssd ca I use on my computer?  I have 2 * 4 GB of ram

  You may not use SAS (serial attached scsi) you need a SATA SSD and Yes, it works perfectly. If you are willing to spend a lot of money to get the best, I suggest a Samsung 840 Pro.

  http://www.Newegg.com/product/product.aspx?item=N82E16820147194

  They make them up to 512 GB, but they make Evo model with a to.

  http://www.Newegg.com/product/product.aspx?item=N82E16820147248

  The spec Evo not quite as fast as the Pro, but one is very fast. In fact, it's really hard to go wrong with a SSD SATA-III.

  If you need help with the physical installation or migration of software.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• MD3000i and TL 2000

  I was wondering if it is possible to connect the TL2000 to the MD3000i SAS out port.

  TL 2000 has 2 LTO 3 drives with SAS ports.

  The MD 3000i has dual iSCSI controllers

  The reason is that I picked up a used rack. And everything should work, but I did not see the connected cables before he was down.

  And I don't see any other sources he may have been connected. None of the servers have no external SAS port.

  When I plug the 2000 TL in the MD3000i she complains of the degraded SAS ports and it stays that way.

  TL 2000 said its 3/Gbit connected and OK. I read somewhere that degraded port maybe because it is using 1 of 4 channels.

  Both are upgraded to latest firmware.

  So my questions.

  If supported what menu in MDSM would he appear in if everything...

  If not supported what SAS card recommend.

  Thank you

  Kristian

  Kristian_Br,

  You are not able to connect the TL2000 behind a MD3000i. The reason behind this is that the CM in the 3000i is a RAID controller and you cannot connect the TL to a RAID controller. The TL2000 is supported only to work when it is connected behind a 6GB SAS HBA. That SAS Out Port is only intended to connect the tables as a second MD3000 or an MD1000 expansion MD. If you have any questions do not hesitate to let me know.

• Replacement of failed drives in MD3000i

  8 disks [1] have configured as RAID5 + 1 spare drive. 2 drives are dead. Try to replace them.

  [1] physical path of disk redundancy: OK

        Physical Disk type:             Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)  
  
        Speed:                          7,200 RPM                         Current data rate:              3 Gbps                            Product ID:                     ST31000640SS                      Firmware version:               MS04                              Serial number:                  9QJ2SDBK                          Vendor:                         SEAGATE                           Date of manufacture:            16 December 2008
  

  It seems Seagate do not Barracuda more so I bought the records of Constellation equivalent [2]:

  [2] ST1000NM0023 Seagate HDD 3.5 1 TB SAS

  When I install a new drive in the MD3000i 6 disks of origin stop them all and the SAN comes to a grinding halt. When I remove the new drive, they're all good again and the SAN he walks by along in degraded mode.

  Why insert a new drive would cause the MD3000i to stop working?  If it's a compatibility problem, what are the correct replacement push?

  Only Dell MD3000i certified readers will work in a MD3000i. The support matrix is a list of models supported by car, but also so they have to have the Dell firmware on them (what you can not put on it).

• Can I load windows vista or 7 on this PowerEdge 840?

  Hey guys, first time, coming through a device like this. PowerEdge 840

  Serial number: Service tag removed by privacy policy > | Express service code: abducted by the Express service code privacy policy >

  I read the manual, but still confused, can I load win7 on this machine? It can work as any ordinary windows machine?

  So I went into the boot options and selected the dvd as the first player, but it just goes straight to windows server 2003. Something up with this device in any case, whenever I have manually close it restarts and the fan is very noisy? Is this way, it is supposed to work, or it is supposed to be silent?

  There is 3x73GB readers in this machine and there is 2 pci cards connected to a smal circuit located at the rear of the 3 HARD drive, what can I do here in order to bypass this RAID system to connect a HARD drive to load windows OS please?

  The connector on the disks look like regular SATA connectors but the description on the Maxtor disk reads:

  ATLAS 10K V, 3.5 SERIES

  73 GB Serial Attached SCSI

  They are not SATA disks? If not and I can use a SATA drive, do I have to remove 3 disks and place a SATA drive in one of the slots?

  herbertsherpa

  I read the manual, but still confused, can I load win7 on this machine? It can work as any ordinary windows machine?

  You might be able to install Windows 7, but NO server has been tested and validated to run no matter WHAT client operating system. They are tested and developed for the server operating system. That said, it doesn't mean it won't work, but you will need to use the drivers 2008R2.

  herbertsherpa

  So I went into the boot options and selected the dvd as the first player, but it just goes straight to windows server 2003. Something up with this device in any case, whenever I have manually close it restarts and the fan is very noisy? Is this way, it is supposed to work, or it is supposed to be silent?

  Servers are not supposed to be quiet, but as part of the POST, the fans turn loudly when first energized. If they do not ramp down to a 'normal' speed, there may be a problem with the fans, sensors or environment (or the lid can be turned off).

  Make sure there is a check mark next to the DVD drive... means it is enabled. Also, how did you create your Windows media?

  herbertsherpa

  There is 3x73GB readers in this machine and there is 2 pci cards connected to a smal circuit located at the rear of the 3 HARD drive, what can I do here in order to bypass this RAID system to connect a HARD drive to load windows OS please?

  You can install Windows with a RAID System... you just need drivers. What model of controller RAID do you have?

  herbertsherpa

  The connector on the disks look like regular SATA connectors but the description on the Maxtor disk reads:

  ATLAS 10K V, 3.5 SERIES

  73 GB Serial Attached SCSI

  They are not SATA disks? If not and I can use a SATA drive, do I have to remove 3 disks and place a SATA drive in one of the slots?

  SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) are not the SATA drives, but SAS controllers/cables/funds of basket are 'retro' - compatible with SATA. You CAN put SATA drives out there, but it won't change anything. Windows will treat it the same. Windows only communicates with the controller, not directly with the player.

• PowerEdge T110II - Dell Perc H200

  Hi all

  Is there a chance to use at the same time SAS and SATA HDD on the Dell Perc H200 controller installed in the PowerEdge T110II? Currently I 3xSATA HARD drive and I thought to add additional SAS HDD, so is it possible that controller to be taken in charge this kind of configuration.

  Thanks in advance.

  Martino

  Should work.

• How Flash perc 6i controller integrated in dellR710?

  Hi all

  I'm wrong, net flashed on board controller perc 6i server Dell R710.

  I want to Flash the firmware on it again. I checked the dell website, but there is only the procedure on "how to upgrade". I totally want to flash back, the 4 MB file on the map, where I can get it?

  Hi Renon,

  According to what is the current state, here are the links to the FW updates. If the FW is completely annihilated, and the map is no longer functional, there is a good chance that you can not solve this problem.

  (1) you can try flashing the FW within your operating system by running the file update directly

  Integrated firmware PERC6I 6.3.3 - 0002, A00, published on 17/05/2013, recommended, Urgent if yours is less 6.1.1
  Windows: http://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER01002138M/1/SAS-RAID_Firmware_F96NR_WN32_6.3.3-0002_X00.EXE

  Red Hat: http://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER01002136M/1/SAS-RAID_Firmware_F96NR_LN_6.3.3-0002_X00.BIN

  GnuPG: http://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER01002137M/1/SAS-RAID_Firmware_F96NR_LN_6.3.3-0002_X00.BIN.sign

  (2) use the idrac web interface and run remote file update (version .exe for windows) from the update tab.

  (3) use any bootable media to start the command prompt and run the version that is not packaged.

  Non-packaged/Hard Drive: http://downloads.dell.com/FOLDER01000364M/8/SAS_RAID_PERC6i-int_6.3.3-0002_A00_ZPE.exeextract the non-package files out and run update.bat using provided from the following bootable media.

  A common way to do this is to use the following tool to create a USB Bootable flash to in order to get the command prompt.

  See > how to create a Bootable USB Flash using Dell Diagnostics Deployment Package (DDDP) drive
  http://www.Dell.com/support/article/us/en/19/SLN143196/en

  Use the switch 'forcetype' with the update command.
  Ex: update.bat - forcetype

  Please let us know if this helps

• Mystery of automatic prioritization

  Hi guys,.

  so I have a question about a feature called Auto tiering on a device of Compellent storage use cases in our special offer and I hope someone has some experience or can give me a kick in the right direction.

  I work for a company developing software with an i would say medium virtualized infrastructure. We welcome approximately 420 VM´s, 90% of them, we need for the process of software development. If the developers run compile / build jobs etc on them. The workload, we see is very asymmetric, because these jobs Don t run on each virtual machine on every time. Some vm´s have charge only 1 time a week about two times and so on. But if they have no charge, it's e/s very heavy. There are a lot of (in thousands) of small files that will read the compilers and after compiling objects will also be written to disk. In outbreak scenarios we see around 20 k - 30 k IOPS / sec with a 60%: 40%, sometimes 50%: 50% read/write distribution.

  At present, we have an infrastructure of netapp storage with CF on a Cluster HA FAS3140 (15KSAS all disks). The infrastructure is about 4 years old and we need to change. We have problems performance wise and also wise ability. We now have a HDS as a competitor to a refreshed Netapp infrastructure. In the presentation, DELL showed us a feature called Auto tiering which made me very suspicious. In their example, they had 3 levels with T1 with SSD´s, with disks SAS 10 K and T2 T3 with SATA drives high capacity. I have big problems that this feature is contraproductive in the scenario of the workload, we have. For example, if a virtual machine is on T1, performance will be fine, now will not serve the VM, let´s say for a week (which is quite common in the development process). Because of this she will come down to T3 on the SATA drives and the next time the build job runs, everything will be read among the slow readers and Performance could be worse than now.

  Anyone has experience with it in the real world, thoughts, etc.? Everything will be highly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Trying to answer from my phone the last time, was probably not a good idea for such a long message. I hope that this message will help clarify things a bit more for you, but if not please feel free to ask additional questions.

  You are right, in Progression of data is not a real time process and runs on a schedule. Scheduling frequency for progress data is not something that you can adjust. Almost 6 years that I worked with the product, it was always once every 24 hours. The only setup option you had was time of day has started, but the default is always to 19:00. I've heard rumors that the frequency has been adjusted for a year or to take account of the SSD configurations, but that only she set to be once every 24 hours to be something more like once every 4 hours. Yet once, there no options to adjust progress data to run only once every week or every month.

  Storage profiles can be custom created once you replace the "manual mode". Otherwise, you have access to established, unchangeable system 4, profiles, you can freely assign the volumes. To be honest 4 created storage profiles must cover more than 99% of all use cases. The default profile is called "Recommended (all levels)" and is what uses almost every created volume. However, there is nothing to prevent you from doing any desired custom storage profile, but I highly recommend he's talking with someone well versed in HDS before making like the great majority of the client I treated issues were because people wanted resist how to use the system and eventually caused the system to run worse than if they had left only with the default values.

  Progression of data does not exactly depend on Replays (snapshots), but its usefulness is significantly improved when Replays are taken at least once per cycle of Progression of the data. I don't really know where to direct you to more information about what your Dell storage specialists or the Dell Web site. I don't know that Dell came with a few nice by now marketing information that can explain it, but when I was at HDS and Dell it wasn't really something good and it was often a whiteboard with clients discussion. What you are looking for is the presentation entitled "The day in the life of a Page" and to be honest, Scott DesBles gave the best presentation of the present on everybody that I ever heard. Without trying to type all of the presentation to the top in this response, the best I can explain it is that with a snapshot, you can lock all the blocks (pages) as read only until they expire. Because the storage profile offers you the possibility of storing writable data differently than to re-read the data, you can configure the system to force writes to RAID 10 on a layer, but store the replays at RAID 5/6 on the same level. This may not seem like much, but what you get is the additional disk space to store your data, rather that just by using RAID 10 without taking any show major strike on the Scriptures or the readings. If after that the reading is taken from a page is modified by a server, a new page is created, and the plan of the active volume is updated to reference the new page instead of the old. The key here is that the new page is rewritten in the RAID 10 system and nothing should be done to the old. Within the system, Compellent, there are 3 types of pages:

  • Active - these pages are writable
  • Accessible history - these pages are read only, but still referenced by an active volume
  • Inaccessible history - these pages are read only and only referenced by a replay (no active volume cannot access)

  If you understand and loved your Netapp systems, then you'll probably actually history of operation of Tegile. However, I fully understand the criticality of the good support and what a challenge it can be when you're not in the same part of the world as a provider. Tegile has teams in Europe and I would be more than willing to contact you if you wish. Just send me a note and I will pass on your details.

  Aaron Gipson