5320 MCU Sip settings

Similar Questions

• a way to move c90 to 5320 mcu Conference

  I have a setup where we use the multi-site c90 option. Is it possible to move a video conference live from c90 to 5320 mcu. The reason is that there may be a 5 attending the video conference and c90 can handle 4 (3 + himself). I don't know if one needs for 5 participants before the video conference begins and I have no port on the 5320 MCU to run all the video conference with this

  Does anyone know a solution to this?

  Best regards

  Jesper

  Check:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/TC6/api_reference_guide/codec-C90-API-reference-guide-tc62.PDF

  
  xCommand Call UnattendedTransfer
  Transfers an ongoing call to another participant. The CallID is returned when the xCommand Dial command is run. During the call you can run the xStatus Call command to see the CallId. Fully supported for SIP calls only.
  Requires user role: USER
  Parameters:
  CallId(r): <0..65534> Number(r):
  Example:
  xCommand Call UnattendedTransfer CallId: 2 Number: [email protected]/* */ com
  *r TransferUriResult (status=OK): ** end
  

• Cisco 5320 MCU layout / view

  We recently converted a MPS200 bridge to a microcontroller of 5320 Cisco.  We have multipoint Conference with 8 participants.  The new 5320 MCU automatically selected a layout component 9.

  It is that some of the participants in this appeal cannot see their auto show, as well as other 8 participants. They can switch back and comes between discovers them, and the participant discovers, but can't see both at the same time.

  This issue was addressed after his conversion to the new MCU.  Any advice?

  If you don't want to see for yourself, you will need to check the box.

  Do you see yourself with small squares
  Do not duplicate with small squares

  Please see the documentation for more information

  (taken from the online help you directly on the box (see the info / help buttons at the top of your mcu settings page))

  Do you see yourself with small squares	Prevents the MCU Conference participants their own videos into small tiles of views of the component of variable size (and conferences with the shutters of equal size).	If this option is set, then a participant will never appear in a small window (see auto), even if there is a free small component available.   They can still appear in larger shutters, however, for example, if the development of view is changed manually to show their video.  See understand how to show participants in the page layout view for more details.
  Do not duplicate with small squares	The MCU prevents duplicating large participating pane with small squares.	When you use a view of the Conference with some aspects of some small and large, the MCU will duplicate usually in a small window the video of a participant showed a large glass.  This is done to minimize the commutation of small tiles in response to changes in activity participating in the General pane.  If you prefer not to duplicate the participants into small tiles in this way, select this option.  For more details on view page layouts, see understand how to display the participants for the layout.

  In addition, it is not really clear what they see and how it is different and how they are passed to the page layout

  and how it behaves different for different endpoints.

  Is there a model, such as specific endpoint types, versions of the software, users...

  So maybe you could do some photos or even a short video.

  In addition to all this, I these two checkboxes and telling people to use their local view on their

  point endpoint to see if they need to check if they seem to always good :-)

  Most of the people I spoke to find annoying if they you themselves, especially as the MCU always adds some lag.

• 5320 MCU in TMS - booking Conference

  I have a new 5320 MCU configured and managed in the TMS.  I can create a conference directly on the MCU, add participants, and it will dial a number and join the participants to the call correctly.  However, if I try to book a conference at TMS by selecting the participants and resource MCU, MCU does not connect endpoints for the call.  If I look at the details of calls that it said shows the following.  It's like he is waiting for the client to call the bridge, not the MCU outbound calls to customers?

  Participants will connect using this route:

  Customer MOVI ==> Bridge

  Hi if it is customer movi you attempt to dial, you must assign the automatic Conference connect and then add outgoing call participants where you type the movi/jabber address manually. You can see the connection setting tab before saving the Conference to see how the call will be set up (if the mcu expectd the customer allowing to switch or the mcu dial out). Customer MOVI has not automatically as regular endpoints generally have for the SCM cannot guarantee the call will implement.

  /Magnus

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• 5320 MCU software update 3.1 TS

  We currently have 5320 MCU running version 4.5 (1.45). I see that Cisco offers code TelePresence MCU server:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/conferencing/Telepresence-MCU-5320/model.html#releasenotes ~ rdtab1

  Looking at the release notes is not very clear if when running 3.1 GST in MCU we will lose the ability to "Téléprésence MCU" in CUCM to use this 5320 MCU for Ad - hoc conferences.

  I know that GST 3.1 does not offer this possibility, but if you look at the file name for the MCU is cisco_ts_3.1_1.98_for_mcu_5300.zip (32,04 MB) vs GST 3.1 cisco_ts8700_3.1_1.98.zip (26,24 MB)

  Thank you

  If you upgrade your 5320 MCU with the telepresence server migration software, it will transform the MCU in a server of telepresence for all functions and features will be a telepresence server and not a MCU.  See the Software of TS running on MCU 5300 Series installation guide on how to convert your MCU to a telepresence server, if you are interested.

  Here are two good discussions comparing platforms MCU and telepresence server, one of them specifically on migration from one to the other.

  What-difference-between-MCU-Cisco-Telepresence-Server

  Why-Replace-MSE-8510-MCU-44-Telepresence-Server-31

  The cisco_ts_3.1_1.98_for_mcu_5300 software is for a series of 5300 MCU migrating to a server of telepresence.  The cisco_ts8700_3.1_1.98 software is specifically for the hardware already running a TP server software, such as the various servers of telepresence models listed here, this includes MCUs migrated to the server TP as the 5300 MCU to MCU MSE 8510 series software.

• C90 w/4210/5320 MCU H.239 Frame Rate

  I admit the departure, it's "H.239 101" type question, but our environment is transitional on very old rooms of 4:3 which were never designed to manage content on separate screens so I'm just now my hands dirty with the intended user, experience sharing content.

  My question is around H.239 - cadence for C90 endpoints as well as MCU-4210/5320...on the surface, it seems that they are able to share plenty of movement, full-video cadence in the H.239 channel, right? must be able to handle 720 p, 30 frames per second?

  In tests, I connected a C90 to two MCU to the relatively high rate of calls (1.5 MB, 2,0 MB) and when I check stats, H.239 channel turns to the expected bitrate and resolution-but very low frequency of frames... between 4/7 frames per second

  I think I am missing some setting commonly or game setting between the endpoint and MCU.

  In addition to setting minimum outflow for the content on the MCU, what other effects H.239 - cadence? I tried to play with the settings of weight main/presentation in the C90, but does not appear to affect the results.

  Thanks in advance for any response

  Take a look at this discussion, cisco-mse-8510-content-frame-rate-and-resolution-limitations.  In short, the cadence of the content that is being received and sent by the MCU are dependent on how you have the quality that is configured for the endpoint PC Input, that is to say: (default) sharpness or movement.  There is no middle ground, or dynamic parameters, it's one of those two.

• Cisco Telepresence 5320 MCU

  Hello..

  We have integrated Cisco MCU 5320 CUCM Version 10.x and we are able to make calls to endpoints registered CUCM (SX20) to MCU with the ID of the meeting in addition to this, we use also VCS-control and have endpoints registered Polycom on to him but we are not able to make calls to MCUS using endpoints of Polycom recorded on VCS - C.

  Please suggest a guide too which can support on the rules of numbering as well.

  Rgds,

  Vika

  I am not able to give a precise any comparison between the differences of a MCU which is on CUCM or VCS, as I do not have a background in call manager.

  What is the problem you are having with TMS scheduling?  Can you elaborate and explain that you have problems with, I can try to help.

• Conference MCU SIP with VCS registration question

  Hi all

  We have a cluster of MSE 8510 MCU (software version 4.5 (1.72), Build 6.19 (1.72)) with 86 active confeneces. All of them are configured in the same way, to use H.323 and SIP registrar calls control.

  The thing is, I can see all conferences recorded under H323 and some of them just registered as SIP on the VCS cluster (X.8.2.2).

  What is the problem? Why can't all register using SIP?

  See you soon,.

  Petar

  Can you check to see how many conferences are recorded using SIP?

  If it's 50, this seems to be the maximum that can be recorded, see enhancement request CSCum48651.

• 5320 MCU and EX60

  Hello

  I was wondering if you could register EX60 directly to the MCU5320

  I can't find any documentation on how to do it properly

  i'm train to try to register as SIP in vain

  any help will be greatly appreciated

  Thank you

  Unlike the previous TANDBERG MCUs, none of the newer Cisco microcontrollers including the 5300 series is not an inner gatekeeper or clerk.  You will need to either save it to a CUCM or VCS call control server.

• Configuration of the firewall Cisco Telepresence MCU 5320

  Hi all.

  I searched all the documents of the MCU again, but I found nothing on the ports it uses.

  Help me

  HI Sandra.  The 5320 MCU is the same as 4500 MCU.

  Incoming ports

  • FTP - TCP:21 + transient (dynamic rather than fixed) used TCP ports for passive mode
  • HTTP - TCP:80
  • HTTPS - TCP:443
  • H.323 - TCP:1720 + ephemeral TCP ports for incoming calls
  • SNMP - UDP:161
  • Outgoing calls to H.323 involve ephemeral ports TCP connections TCP TCP:1720 and a certain number of ephemeral TCP ports
  • Outgoing SIP TCP calls involve connections between the TCP ephemeral ports and TCP:5060
  • Outgoing SIP TCP calls involve connections between the TCP ephemeral ports and TCP:5061
  • Outgoing interruptions SNMP are sent the ephemeral ports UDP Port 162
  • Media (including audio and video, FECC messages) are ephemeral ports from ephemeral ports UDP.
  • The products acquired Cisco TANDBERG/Codian and gateway series series Cisco TelePresence allocate the ephemeral ports between 49152 to 65535 *. It is possible to change the ports on which these products receive and establish connections. For example, by default the Codian products Cisco acquired listen port 1720 H.323 calls and connections to port 80 web browser, but these can be modified (go to network > Services).

  Keep in mind this MCU does not support the streaming or conference me and have either the GK aboard.  If these ports are listed.

  The link to the Article can be found here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/articles/conferencing_products_conferenceme_ports_used_kb_3.shtml

  VR

  Patrick

• Cisco 5300 MCU failed to register with the SIP registrar

  I have a new Cisco 5300 MCU I have just begain configuration initially.  Under settings, SIP, it says registered.  However, to the title of the Conference, I have set up, it is said the recording failed.  If I click on failure, under the statistical heading he says SIP Registrar ID, could not be saved. No reason? Thank you.

  You made sure check the box 'Allow digital ID Registration for conferences' on the settings > page on the MCU SIP?

  If Yes, did you effectively ensure the digital 'ID' field with a numeric for the Conference in question when trying to SIP register for the Conference?

• The MCU 5320 Port usage report

  Is there a report that I can run to study the historical use of 5320 MCU ports including overall use?

  If you use one of the latest vesion of TMS, then Yes, you can - see report > use of Bridge.

  Wayne
  --
  Remember the frequency responses and mark your question as answered as appropriate.

• MCU migrate Server TP

  Just curious about how long it takes to migrate a 8710 leave a 8510 or 5320 MCU on a Mulit-party 320 support?

  I am referring to this process.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/TS/...

  I do not have a practical MCU I can convert and I am looking at a level of effort. If you've done this before, can you give me an idea of how long it took?

  THX,

  Rob

  It's like any other MCU upgrade, the only difference is taken into account for the extra time essentially through a new facility for the first time.  This is because after you install the software, the MCU will restart and set up as a new server of telepresence with no activation/option key and a blank configuration.  It really depends on the speed at which you can get by adding in the license keys and in-depth how you want to be by configuring the settings of the server.  I don't remember exactly how long it took when I tested with my MCUs, but maybe 30 minutes to an hour off the top of my head.

• Integration of TANDBERG 1700 MXP configuration with CUCM (h.323/SIP)

  I tried to configure a CUCM with TANDBERG 1700 MXP 8.5 and I could not, if someone has already done and help me with this number SIP or H323.

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  Mxp units can be saved on cucm as endpoints (base) of third parties.

  Please find the steps to enter mxp.

  The sip on mxp as uri and sip proxy address settings.

  1. sip mode: on

  2 SIP Uri: [email protected] / * / of cucm for example: [email protected]/ * /.

  3 server discovery: manual

  4. server address: ip address of cucm.

  5 server Type: cisco

  6. transport: whether auto snack but who do not work, change to udp.

  7 TLs: off

  8: authentication sip username: user you created on cucm eg 9011 or amlesh

  9 password: use the same password configured when creating user 9011 or amlesh

  CUCM config:

  1. Select the basic profile of third party.

  2. Add the mac address of endpoint mxp.

  3. Select the appropriate sip, phone etc models profile.

  4. under user digest and owner user id select the same user, for example: 9011 or amlesh

  5. save the configuration and assign DN even that we used in the uri on mxp sip settings.

  6. also associate device mxp the user using the association on cucm devices pane.

  Please let me know if that work for you. I tried this in my lab and works.

  Thank you

  Amlesh

• MCU vs VCS

  Hello

  IM pretty new to the Conference and I got confused on the following scenario:

  I need to be a conference for 13 calls from the neighborhood of 13 other branches in full HD, now I need to deploy 5 monitors in the neighborhood and 2 monitors in each site.

  1. If I could see 5 full HD calls selected 4 branches as maximum, and a thumbnail view of active presence for the rest 10 called "like a small miniature screen" in the fifth form.

  2. I can view max for 2 full HD in each branch, which is the main player with someone else.

  In my opinion for equipment would be as follows:

  1 x C90 in the main office of DD, PR

  13 x SX20 in every branch with DD, PR

  1xVCS in the main office

  1 x 5320 MCU

  Whatever it takes? IM pretty confused now.

  Kind regards

  The server all telepresence is to merge the calls in a conference - it is essentially a different type of MCU :)

  Also note that while the C90 is able to 12Mbps full HD, it is when the C90 himself welcomes the call via its multisite functionality.  It can accommodate 3 or 4 calls at the same time in a conference, but you use not or need this feature if you have a MCU or TP server.

  If I were you, my construction should look like this:

  13 x MX200/MX300 (according to what screen size you wanted - it's the only real difference between the two)

  1 x Control VCS + 15 licenses non-traversal call

  1 telepresence Server 7010 + 12 x screen licenses

  1 x SX80 + whatever screens/monitors you wanted, even if a MX700 may be a better choice (55 "double screens with built in codec)

  1 x conductor of telepresence (free version).

  Note that in this scenario, two of your endpoints to compose in 720 p, because 1 x display License = 1 call full HD or 2 x 720 p calls and the 7010 can only accommodate a maximum of 12 licenses of the screen.  The next top model can accommodate 48 but is much more expensive.

  So, you would use driver + TP server to host all of your conferences, all of your points endpoint to register for VCS and deal in the Conference.