8132 PC battery iSCSI VLANS by subnet

Similar Questions

• How VLANs ' IP subnet ing works with based port of VLAN (series N2000 and N3000)

  Hi all

  I have a small pile of x N3024 2 acting as my heart L3 with a lag of 2 x 10 g down to a stack of x N2048 5 acting as L2 switch for my PC workstations.

  Workstations are that all on the port assigned VLAN 10 (switchport access vlan 10). I have a bunch of developers who want to access without restrictions more or less to assign random IP addresses for their VM (Virtualbox and VMware) Workstation.  As you can imagine, I would like some control over this situation.  the powerconnect guide I described features of subnet IP VLAN but does not seem to enter in how it works and interacts with the port actually function vlan assignments.

  What I currently have is the VLAN 10 assigned to a segment that support the subnet 172.100.x.x which dates back to our base of L3 for routing to other segments. What I want to do is to configure the VLAN based on IP and then load the dev is to config their VM with another IP range, say 10.10.x.x.

  Theory here is, I set the L3 core with say 20 VLAN and an IP to register in L3 path between subnets and then configure the battery switch L2 workstation with IP - based VLAN to recognize 10.10.x.x and separate on VLAN 20.

  However, I think the simplified here question is if I have a nail up to 10 ports VLAN, will the than basic work IP subnet VLANS as I want only it? Or, I need to create a subnet IP VIRTUAL local area network for the two IP ranges? I have to remove the assignenment VLAN per port and are based entirely on the treatment of subnet IP VLAN?

  If there is a better RTFM on this topic you can tell me I would appreciate it

  Thank you!

  I ended up calling specialists... great Dell technical support here.

  In fact, the IP based VLAN works very close to what I want to achieve. Missing from the user guide is that the port needs to be in the mode. Ports using switch port mode and bound to a VLAN just didn't work... probably because the vlan IP based did not differ from the port binding. Dell support has suggested to use the trunk mode, but my answer is finished using the general mode; any traffic not referenced, PVID located my usual LAN vlan ID and acceptance of port traffic of new vlan based on IP. In this way, I'm able to have a physical host DHCP on the corporate LAN and a virtual machine on that host to bind to a different subnet which is then isolated in the new NAV based on IP.

• VLANS, DHCP, subnet, gateways and Multipathing Setup Question

  Hi, I have a House VI3 test network configured like this:

  Netgear wireless router,

  Adapter plugged into Port A1 of HP Procurve wireless game layer of 4000 M 2 switch with 802. 1 q (provides the uplink to my router upstairs that serves internet)

  VLAN by default 1 is 192.168.1.X/24

  On this switch, I have 2 ESX boxes with 4 cards each, Openfiler iSCSI target and a Windows XP Pro box running my Virtual Center.

  I have a Virtual Machine that running SBS2003 with also serves as my DNS server and my DHCP server.

  SBS2003 - 192.168.1.6

  Gateway (router Netgear) 192.168.1.1

  ESX1 - 192.168.1.10

  ESX2 - 192.168.1.11

  XP Pro - 192.168.1.50

  Well, with that of the road, my question is I want to set up a VLAN on my switch Procurve to separate traffic by default network, iSCSI and vMotions traffic.  By ESX Server best practices. to install a second Nic vKernel or SVC Nic console, they must be on a separate subnet with a defined gateway.  If I create a new vLAN for iSCSI and assign a network adapter, the network traffic will not be able to see my gateway. I also need my DHCP server to receive requests from any computer on any vLAN individual and issue a corresponding IP address.

  Now, what should I do?  If I create a vLAN Tirtiary or the second, I'm not able to see the DHCP server of these VLANS?  I can only UNTAG a port in 1 vLAN and port of marking abandon any connection to my DHCP server.  On this switch I assign IP addresses for individual VLANs, but this did not help.  DHCP isn't bradcasting across multiple VLANs. Am I missing a piece of hardware to provide ACLs or something?

  I don't know where to go from here, please help.

  Hello

  To route between VLANs, you must be a switch of layer 3, is a router configured as "a router on a stick", which is essentially a port of the switch, configured as a trunk, connected to the router that is configured with a number of interfaces, one for each VLAN so that it can route traffic between the VLANS. Now create a VLAN for VMotion traffic is fine as has no need to be routed. The VLAN for iSCSI and VLAN to the Service console will have to be sent to iSCI work properly. DHCP can work through several VLANS but need aid IP to be configured on the switch.

  Concerning

• RV180W ping hostname between VLAN & different subnets

  Hello

  I had a RV180w with 1.0.3.10 closes. According to the name of position, I'm not able to resolve host names between different VLANS which affected to different subnets, for example, allows said I have the following hosts:

  CASA:

  192.168.241.100/25 (wired - VLAN 1)

  Router: 192.168.241.1

  DNS: 192.168.241.1

  XBMC: 192.168.242.100/25 (Wi - FI - VLAN 2)

  Router: 192.168.242.1

  DNS: 192.168.242.1

  If I try to ping from two sources to one of the two destinations, the only one I get is a message 'impossible '.

  Authorized additional information routing between vlans & proxy DNS and if I try to look at the hostname under the 'nslookup' command, I could not resolve the host name, but if I do a "ping - a 192.168.241.100 ' it is said ' response from CASA (192.168.241.100) blah blah blah."

  So what I'm missing here?

  Hi Bruno, you can usually solve different subnet host name because the host does not know the subnet that treats it as a security measure.

  Disable the firewall feature on your computers and which must fix, otherwise you will probably have to change the lmhost files.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Battery M8024-k (pair) M3048 (pair) battery gal, VLAN and port groups?

  Hi all

  I'm getting more confused by the minute.  I have a pair of M8024-k blade switches in a M1000e enclosure, outside, I have a pair of N3048 switches.

  I think I have the job of stacking on the M8024-k, but I found a configuration guide for Simple mode that says take port 17-20 outside the Group of ports on the pair aggregation and leave the stack ports and internally in the PA Group.  When I do that they remain outside the group, if I do it in the CLI or the GUI.

  Does anyone have a configuration guide that shows how I can pair trunk the 2 together and allow 4 VLAN that I keep coming without access to blade servers inside?  What I get out of simple mode on the M8024-k to achieve?

  Any help gratefully received.

  

  The best source of information is going to be the user guides.

  www.Dell.com/.../manuals

  www.Dell.com/.../manuals

  I would wear the 8024-k off simple mode.

  Console# not simple mode

  On two batteries, you will need to aggregate 4 ports together.  Here is an example to place a port in an aggregation group.

  Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/5

  Console (Config-if-1/0/5) # channel-group mode 1 (active / Auto)

  Once the ports are in a channel-group 1, we can then configure the channel group to perform for several VLANs.

  Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

  trunk mode console (config-if-po1) #switchport

  #switchport console (config-if-po1) trunk allowed vlan add 2-150

  This is done, you should have connectivity.

  Keep us informed.

• Adding a second iSCSI VLANS

  Aloha kakou - from now on, I have an iSCSI SAN (98.x) connected to my cluster. I need to add another connection to a second SAN (99.x). The only difference (at least for now), 99.x will be given LUN only (access via iSCSI initiator within the virtual machine) and 98.x has VM LUN and data.

  To do this - even if it's just data, the structure of 99.x vSwitch must be identical to 98.x (they have the same components)?

  Mahalo, Bill

  That's right, because communication iSCSI occurs between the o/s VM and iSCSI SAN - the Service Console/VMkernel port does not - this should answer any questions http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1010547

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Question about VMKernel iSCSI traffic and VLANS

  Hello

  This is a very fundamental question that I'm sure I know the answer too, but I want to ask him anyway just to reassure myself.  As a precursor to my question, the configuration of my ESX infrastructure is best described here: http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/VMware+ESX+4.0+and+PowerVault+MD3000i.  Or more precisely, we have two controllers MD3000i.  Each controller has two ports and each port is configured on two different subnets, with every subnet connected to the different switch.  ESX host are connected to two switches.  The only difference for the guide, is we have two MD3000i configured the same, connection to the same switches.  Each MD ports is configured on the same subnet, but different IP addresses.

  At present, we are in the process of upgrading our two iSCSI switches of humble Dlink DGS - 1224T to Cisco 2960 T of.  The switches have been and continue to be dedicated to iSCSI traffic, however, I'm trying to set up VLAN s on the side of the switch.  Originally, we used the default VLANS on switches, however, after you have added an another MD3000i, noted the Support Dell best practices is to separate each on its own subnet and VLAN MD3000i iSCSI traffic. This would result in iSCSI 4 VLANS, two on each switch and two for each MD3000i.  Firstly, is this in fact of good practices?

  Second, if I migrate preceding 4 iSCSI VLANS, as each switch port will actually be an access port, will there need to complete the VLAN ID field in the VMKernel configuration page? Presumably, this field is used when the tagging VLAN is used, but as our switches do not need any other rocking trunk (as they are dedicated to iSCSI traffic), there should be no need to fill?  I guess it would be prudent to keep the two existing subnets, create two new subnets and make changes to an MD3000i and connection of the ESX host.  Provided the switch and switch ports has been appropriate configured with VLAN on the right, the rest should be transparent and he wouldn't be Intel VLAN in all ESX hosts?

  Would be nice to get answers and thank you in advance!

  Gene

  (1) Yes, it is best practice for ESX iscsi, having an independent network and vlan for iscsi traffic.

  (2) No, there is no need to mention anything in the area of vlan, if you use an access port. Its a mandatory thing than a choice. If you supply the id vland with access port, it loses connectivity.

  Please explain a bit why you need to create two different virtual local networks for each MD3000i. You are going to use several on the same ESX box iscsi storage? Alternatively, you use only a single iscsi and use these 4 ports for the same single VMkernel interface?

  NUTZ

  VCP 3.5

  (Preparation for VCP 4)

• Running the software iSCSI on a different subnet than the management traffic

  I hope I'm missing something obvious you smart people might be able to help with.

  I am trying to put in place a small instance of vSphere using ESXi 4.0 Update 2 and unlike most of our environment, we use the iSCSI instead of fibre SAN storage.

  The intention is to set up a network on subnet A, for management and Vmotion traffic which will have 2 natachasery attached.

  We have a second 'B' allocated for iSCSI storage subnet and have 2 separate natachasery which will be implemented through two vSwitches, 1 Teddy for each.

  We have implemented the switch management/vmotion on a subnet and, of course, the default for this subnet gateway entry when asked.

  The iSCSI subnet naturally has a different gateway and so when I entered IP address on subnet B in the port of core, it seems always trying to route through the gateway to subnet an attack to storage not being is not visible.

  We have verified that the problem is not with the storage or the ESXi put in place by proving that if we give the iSCSI port IP subnet A (and also the storage) then we can see storage without problems - simply, the question seems to be everywhere to try to operate on a completely isolated subnet.

  Isolation of storage traffic is a customer demand, and not something that we cannot ignore.

  Anyone know if it's possible (and if so what should I do to solve the problem) OR should we look for to move to ESX Classis and use his ability to use 2 different gateways?

  I feel that I must be missing something pretty obvious I don't know there must be a way to achieve segregation of traffic on subnets for the other core activities such as vmotion, fault tolerance and management traffic.

  There is only one door of entry for VMkernel, then you can separate VMotion / iSCSI / fault tolerance than if not routable subnets, i.e. all hosts on the same subnet.

  ---

  MCSA, MCTS Hyper-V, VCP 3/4, VMware vExpert

  http://blog.vadmin.ru

• EqualLogic group member network configuration error: "management interface should not be on the san subnet.

  Hello

  We currently have new EqualLogic 6100 device with this network configuration:

  Director of the IP - 192.168.0.2 (VLAN1).

  Member network config:
  eth0 - 192.168.0.3 (VLAN1)
  eth1 - 10.10.10.3 (VLAN2)
  eth2 - 10.10.10.4 (VLAN2)
  eth3 - 10.10.10.5 (VLAN2)
  ETH4 - empty

  I would attribute 192.168.0.4 to eth4, but received the error: "management interface should not be on the san subnet.

  I am sure that all interfaces eth has access to the VLAN1 and VLAN2, mean error indicates that eth4 should not access VLAN2 and only access the VLAN1 on the switch?

  Or eth0 should also have access to the VLAN2 only to reconfigure eth0 and eth4?

  Thank you

  > The group eating IP should be in iscsi VLANS?

  Yes!

  Note: If configure you an EQL it will ask an iSCSI port because nothing is more necessary to bring it up. The doest previous EQLs have a dedicated Mgmt Port and later, you can convert the last ethX as a MGMT port. This is the reason why configure you ISCSI at the beginning. (Think of a mixed group of newer and older models, and you get a picture)

  OK... once again it is the one and only member of the Group and there is making the production host connected to the right?

  The change of IP address, to a 3rd. subnet for temporary use.

  -Do not touch eth0-3 and the IP address of the group now

  -Configure the MGMT port and IP address management in the tempr group. Subnet. Use the Config-> Adv. Group-> network MGMT. You can change the MGMT Port of the Member, and the address IP of MGMT

  -For the registration of the configuration, you will lose access. You must place your admin PC in the templ. subnet so

  -Connect to the GroupMgr with temp again. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

  -Now you can change the IP address of group 10.10.10..x

  -Now you can change eth0 10.10.10.2

  -At the end, you can change the address IP of the Group MANAGEMENT, as well as the MGMT Port to 192.168.0.x

  -Change the IP address of your admin PC rear

  A failover, you should consider to hang a serial cable the active controller of the EQL. Use 9600,8,1, N with your favorite terminal program (putty.exe on windows). All the steps, you can perform from the command line.

  If this group and the only member not in production, but you can reset the config and restart from the beginning.

  Kind regards

  Joerg

• Best practices for network configuration of vSphere with two subnets?

  Well, then I'll set up 3 ESXi hosts connected to storage shared with two different subnets. I configured the iSCSI initiator and the iSCSI with his own default gateway - 192.168.1.1 - targets through a Cisco router and did the same with the hosts configured with its own default gateway - 192.168.2.2. I don't know if I should have a router in the middle to route traffic between two subnets since I use iSCSI ports linking and grouping of NETWORK cards. If I shouldn't use a physical router, how do I route the traffic between different subnets and use iSCSI ports binding at the same time. What are the best practices for the implementation of a network with two subnets vSphere (ESX host network: iSCSI network)? Thank you in advance.

  Install the most common iSCSI would be traffic between hosts and

  the storage is not being routed, because a router it could reduce performance.

  If you have VLAN 10(192.168.1.0/24) iSCSI, VLAN 20 (192.168.2.0/24) ESX

  MGMT and VLAN 30 (192.168.3.0/24) comments VMs and VLAN 40 (192.168.4.0/24)

  vMotion a deployment scenario might be something like:

  NIC1 - vSwitch 0 - active VMK (192.168.1.10) MGMT, vMotion VMK (192.168.4.10)

  standby

  NIC2 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC3 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK1 (192.168.1.10) iSCSI

  NIC4 - vSwitch 2 - active VMK2 (192.168.1.11) iSCSI

  NIC5 - vSwitch 1 - current (VLAN30) guest virtual machine port group

  NIC6 - vSwitch 0 - MGMT VMK (192.168.2.10) standby, vMotion

  VMK (192.168.4.10) active

  You would place you on VLAN 10 storage with an IP address of something like target

  192.168.1.8 and iSCSI traffic would remain on this VLAN. The default value

  gateway configured in ESXi would be the router the VLAN 20 with an ip address of

  something like 192.168.2.1. I hope that scenario help set some options.

  Tuesday, June 24, 2014 19:16, vctl [email protected]>

• 4pnics networks VLAN

  Hello

  Well, I am new to vmware.

  I have 2 guests and 4 natachasery by each of them and a hitachi storage 10 hus and a hp procurve 2824.

  When I do a vlan in esx must be the same number in hp switch?

  I would do any other setup in hp except where ports will be to this vlan?

  my scenario is 1 Teddy in vlan 10 vmotion and mgmt, 2 natachasery with iscsi VLANs 20 and the other for VMS vlan 30 / vswitches so 3.

  so I have a thin client and I want to connect with vlan 30 with the thin client vms.my is connected in the hp switch in vlan 30 / when I want to connect in any other t vlan for example I have a vlan 40 with other virtual machines.

  the hp switch automatically routes because it works also in layer 3? is that correct?

  the only thing I have to do is in my virtual machine to the network vlan 40 to add.

  for example when I in a Teddy 3 VLANS configured in vswitch port in the hp switch needs to be referenced, but when I have a vlan in 1 Teddy bear not tagged to the hp switch?

  Yes

  in the routing for gateway what ip I type for the 3 VLAN?

  It is up to you.  You must come up with a model of IP address where all the VLANS are on a different subnet and the IP gateway is part of that subnet.

• Make Accessible iSCSI SAN-VM via Windows iSCSI initiator

  I have a "total newbie" question that I hope can respond quickly enough.

  I added a new DELL MD3000i SAN to my storage network in order to use this SAN exclusively for Windows virtual machines. I have the vdisks large (2) 4 to 7 to each (Yes, I REALLY need unique and large volumes) defined on the MD3000i. (4) the MD3000i ports are connected to my iSCSI VLANS and have the id default host port 192.168.130.101/102 and 192.168.131.101/102.

  I have a MD3220i installed in the network and working with hosts ESXi 4.1 (2) (192.168.230.101/102, 192.168.231.101/102 of the subnets). I am quite familiar with how to make the storage available to the host via the initiator of the iSCCI, but I know not how to make accessible storage for virtual machines WITHOUT using the host to connect to the iSCSI SAN, create a data store, and then add a new virtual disk to the virtual machine.

  Only the vmnic dedicated to the iSCSI initiator have physical links to iSCSI VLANS (vSwitch01). The network switch has (2) network adapters connected to the network via vSwitch0 "inside".

  Any ideas on the best way to "get there from here"?

  Hello.

  You will need to create a group of ports in virtual machine on the same vSwitch created in your iSCSI ports group.  Give the virtual machine a 2nd NETWORK card and then assign it to the created virtual machine port group previously.

  Good luck!

• LRT214 VLAN and site to site vpn

  Hello everyone, I am a bit new to the network of this aspect and was looking for some advice.  I am looking for several routers LRT214 to configure VPN site to site to our main office at 4 locations.  There are 2 VLANS and subnets - one for the network secure (vlan native 1) and one for comments wireless (vlan 2).  It is very good and works well for lan segregation locally.

  IPSEC tunnels do not pass the tags vlan, my question because I will be able to restrict traffic through the vpn tunnel to vlan 1 and deny traffic to vlan 2?

  It appears in the documentation that VPN traffic can be limited by IP address or the local subnet.  My concern is that if there is no way to bind or bridge to the VLAN selected, an adjustable static IP address on a device on the vlan 2 were part of the traffic permitted (vlan 1 range), and therefore cross the tunnel for devices vlan 1 on remote sites.

  Thanks for any input you can offer.

  Hi, seedtech. The VLAN used for the VPN is the default VLAN. So if a tunnel is created, it will cross through the default VLAN.

  Jay-15354

  Linksys technical support

• Get some VLAN voice to work on 5548P

  Hello

  I was wondering if there is a way to accomplish the following. I want the passage to the tag the traffic on its own based on the YES Table and pass it up to the Sonicwall (DHCP server/router) without going through the phone itself do the marking. Is this possible? Currently, the installation so I put manually the VLAN ID on the phone itself, but these phones can work anywhere there is a sense of internet connection if I manually add the tag VLAN, the phone will not work outside of the corporate network.

  Thank you

  If your phone supports LLDP-MED, you can install the switch with a VLAN voice. This wiki covers the implementation of the VLAN voice.

  http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/networking/w/wiki/configuring-Dell-PowerConnect-55xx-series-switch-voice-VLAN.aspx

  Do not have to configure phones that you configure LLDP-MED. The VLAN ID information are passed with LLDP-MED configured on the VoIP phone using the LLDP-MED mechanism. By this method, the voice from the VoIP phone data are tagged with the VLAN ID exchanged and the usual traffic would go to the PVID.

  Here is the link to the user guide. LLDP-MED configuration begins at page 540.

  FTP://FTP.Dell.com/ Manuals /Cccomplis /powerconnect-5524_User%27s%20Guide_en-us.pdf

  Once the phone is in the voice VLAN it can still receive an IP address by the DHCP server using the DHCP relay. The switch acts as a DHCP relay agent that listens for DHCP messages,

  and passes between DHCP servers and clients, residing in IP or VLAN different subnets.

  Relay DHCP and espionage begins on page 563 of the user guide.

  I hope this helps.

• Several VLANs with multiple gateways

  Hello.

  Got a SF500 in Layer 3 mode, 5 VLANS air conditioned and have their own subnet.

  VLAN 10 = 192.168.10.0/24

  VLAN 100 = 192.168.100.0/24

  VLAN 200 = 192.168.200.0/24

  VLAN 201 = 192.168.201.0/24

  VLAN 202 = 192.168.202.0/24

  We have a gateway on Vlan 10 (192.168.10.1), which all VLANS can see & access (because of intervlan routing), and this currently allows for vlan 10 for access to the internet.

  I want to vlan 100 to be able to access the internet through this gateway, although other VLAN (200,201,202), uses a different gateway located on the vlan 200 subnet.

  Of course, the gateway must be in the subnet.  I can't assign the default gateway of a machine on vlan 100, the gateway ip address on vlan 10.

  If I point the virtual interface default gateway in its subnet (for example, 192.168.100.254), he also does not know how to get to the internet, even if she can see the entry door (I can access a web page it hosts).

  So the question is this:

  Traffic 100 VLANs can be routed on the SF500 to use the gateway on the vlan 10? (outside the default gateway of the switch).

  If this is not possible with the SF500, what do I need to make it work?

  Thank you very much.

  Hi André,.

  I understand what you want to achieve, so in your case, we need a switch with PBR (policy based routing) capacity that allow to match the IP source address and action hope then the IP address of the gateway.

  This feature is not implemented in SMB product, but for devices of the company, we have this feature as Catalyst 3750

  Please note or marked as replied to help other customers of Cisco

  Greetings

  Mehdi