A 5.7 Windows Experience score is good?

Similar Questions

• What is happening in the disc of Windows Experience Score? __

  I had a question: what is needed for 'Windows Experience Index' regarding the 'Disk Performance paragraph' to get a 6.9 or 7.9 score?

  He says it's for disk transfer speed, but what it takes?  I have a 6.7 rating on my hard drive, but I think it's on the low side.  I have my full disk defragmented and it is a SAS 15 K 4xRAID0 facility that uses only the 1st third of the Bay of virtual disks.  I've timed to between 300-400 MB/s.  If that rate only a 6.7, I can't help but wonder what kind of hard drive MS could wait a good "windows experience".  I thought an SSD could be the answer, and tried with one of these.  There only speeds of reading/writing of 85 MB/s (i.e. slower by about 75% than my table), but it's looking for time (which are not easily measurable) are, I'm sure, below.  Nevertheless, I put in place as a ReadyBoost device and, when I reinstalled Win7 recently, I had left in the system and it is used as the 'system', although the picture is the 'C' drive with the operating system, real (and device Boot/dump).  I'm not sure what that means the SYSTEM, but if I don't keep it in the machine during start-up, the machine does not start now.  Hmmm... large.

  So what is required for a good disc sub-score anyway?  The rest of my scores are of the order of 7.3 to 7.8, which is predictable given the hardware in each of the categories, but I'm surprised that the disk partition is so low.

  Ideas?  Points of view?

  I wanted to say that there the HDD that can catch your 'Windows Experience Index' upto score mounted 7.9 always Microsoft!

• Windows experience Score - low main drive...

  Hey Gang,

  My i7 rig runs just great for editing, no complaints. I had a look on the score of WE and I myself 7.3 or better in all categories except the primary hard drive (screenshot attached). I don't mean to fix it (it is not broken!) but I'm curious to know why Windows hates my hard drive. My guess is because I'm not in RAID for my OS drive. I'm running a 300 GB Raptor, and everything I installed is Win 7 64 bit, CS4 Production Premium and a few plugins and NeoScene. MS Office does NOT reside on this PC! He got 219GB 279 GB free, so it is quite skinny, and I regularly defrag with O & O Defrag. Anyway, my guess is that 5.9 is high for a single disc... am I pretty sure about it?

  Paulie

  (for the curious, I run assets out of another drive, project files on another, and a third for scratch disks and various junk... everything is at 7200 RPM Caviar Black except for the reader to spam, I went at low cost with a blue WD 7200) If it doesn't, no problem. Indeed, I have no RAID subsystems, but would not affect primary partition HD anyway)

  The Velociraptor tops out at a score of 5.9. I am not satisfied with the performance of my system, always first place on the reference http://ppbm4.com and third place on the results of http://www.passmark.com/baselines/top.html . Nevertheless, I have almost identical to your results:

  

  It seems to be the limitation of the WES. I would not attach any weight to these results. Eventually, it requires an OCZ Colossus as boot device to achieve a score plus 7.0.

  My laptop with MS Office reached only 5.5-5, 9-5, 9 - 5.0 - 5.0 is totally unsuitable for editing.

• Score Windows Experience lowered from 5.8 to 3.4 after reinstallation of Windows 7

  I have a laptop Dell N110r I had to reinstall Windows 7 due to a virus on my hard drive. After doing so my windows experience score reduced from 5.8 to 3.4 the base being the CPU score. I visited the website of elbow and conducted an analysis of system and updated all the drivers. I also clicked on each driver in Device Manager and clicked on put to update driver. My graphics were also reduced dramatically. Is there something else I can do. Pease do not post put me a link that offers a hardware upgrade, because this is exactly the same material into the machine as before the o/s has been reinstalled and score 5.8 gave an hour before reinstalling. The system continues to try to install Interface human chipsets when it has already been downloaded from the Dell website, but has not been opened to install the chipset drivers after that were unzipped. Below you will find detailed information regarding my performance score.

  Manufacturer Dell Inc.   Model Inspiron N5110   Total amount of system memory 6.00 GB RAM   Type of system 64-bit operating system   Number of processor carrots 2

  Total size of hard disc (s) 466 GB   Disk partition (c :)) 421 GB free (466 GB Total)   (D) Media Player CD/DVD

  Type of view map Intel HD Graphics 3000   Total available graphics memory 1 696 MB   Dedicated graphics card memory 64 MB   Dedicated system

  
  memory0 MB   Shared system
  memory 1632 MB   Graphics card driver
  Version 9.17.10.3347   Main monitor
  resolution 1366 x 768   Version of DirectX DirectX
  10

  Network card Bluetooth (personal space device Network)   Network card Intel Centrino Wireless-N 1030   Network card Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport Adapter   Network card Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport

  
  Adapter   Network card Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller

  If you updated your drivers via Device Manager, which would have installed the drivers by default Windows and crushed the provided Dell drivers, the same would have been done if you had recommended updates to be installed automatically and not only important.

  for example Intel HD Graphics does not match that supplied by Dell

  Do not have your recovery disks installed the correct drivers Dell?

• DV7 Graphics Score on Windows experience index (Radeon 6770 M problem?)

  Can someone explain why the HP dv7t 6000 CTO (prod. No.) XW899AV) displays a score for graphics Windows experience index and the reviews which is higher with the Mobile Intel HD Graphics active (6.3) than with the Radeon HD 6770 M (4.1)?

  I don't know if the cause of updates, but the BIOS and graphics drivers have received updates in the last six months or so... the version of the graphics driver is: 8.830.6.3000and the latest BIOS is installed: F.1A.

  Here are the screenshots of two; each result index performance Windows (WEI) uses a different graphics option:

  Mobile Intel HD Graphics

  

  Radeon HD 6770M

  

  post the solution here:
  
  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/notebook-display-and-video/dv7-with-HD-6770M-2GB-has-horrible-D3D-performance-even-after/TD-p/1007183/page/3

• Base score Windows Experience Index-how to improve Graphics score online?

  Vista Home Premium score is 3.5 because graphic Graphics & Gaming... I don't know how to improve these online & the best score is CPU = 4.9... no idea or help there... thanking you, yours sincerely liam k

  Hello

  Once your graphics hardware has later graphics drivers installed or Web site of the manufacturer of the computer or the manufacturer of the graphics card, that's all.

  The only way to improve the graphical result is to buy and install a better graphics card.

  Don't worry too much about what says the Windows experience index.

  You have no graphic problem?

  Therefore, there is no need to worry about this.

  See you soon.

• Poor performance in VMWare Workstation 10 comments VM, score on memory Windows experience index is low

  Specification of the host is A10-5800 AMD CPU & 8 GB DDR3 - 1600 RAM(dual-channel), running VMware workstation 10 on Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1. WEI (Windows experience index) score on memory is 7.3.

  Comments is running Windows 7 Professional 32-bit SP1. VMware tool has been installed. The WEI score on memory is only 4.5. I can feel the difference when you work in the guest, because of the bad performance RAM problem.

  Some way to optimize the performance of comments?

  Can I assume that the customer has more than 960 MB and less than 1.5 GB of memory?  The more possible memory under-score with less than 1.5 GB memory is 4.5.

• Tecra A10-112 - Windows Experience Index 3.4?

  The WEI score is 3.4 with all default settings. The details are the following:

  Processor: 5.4
  Memory: 5.1
  Graphics (office performance): 3.4
  Games graphics: 3.6
  Hard drive: 5.2

  I know that the integrated graphics card isn't help the score in any way. Toshiba A300D-15 b with AMD CPU 2.1 scores 4.8 which has a graphics card dedicated.

  Do not play games, but the disappointing thing is that the performance of office are less than the score of the game.

  Now the question is do I seriously take WEI or the integrated graphics (Intel GMA 4500MHD) is quite good for the time being and for Windows 7?

  Please take into account the fact that A10 - 112 has a resolution of 1680 x 1050 and I think to the graphics card integrated is no match for this resolution in particular with Vista, what you think?

  Hello

  To be honest I think nothing of it. The Windows experience index is ok, but in my opinion it s not really significant.

  But some values are interesting;
  As much as I know graphics performance score Office represents s graphic performance of the system using the Windows Aero Desktop feature. As you've experienced the Aero needs a lot of graphical resources and in my opinion, this value is lower.

  But generally the Mobile Intel GMA 4500MHD isn't bad.
  Graphics memory (performance) can increase the upgrade of the main RAM.
  Thus, for example Vista 32 bit OS:

  RAM 1 GB - dedicated video memory = 64 MB - system memory shared = 158MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 286MB
  2 GB RAM - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 702MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 830MB shared system memory
  RAM 3 GB - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 1214 MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 1342 MB shared system memory
  4 GB RAM - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 1214 MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 1342 MB shared system memory

  Vista 64-bit OS:
  RAM 1 GB - dedicated video memory = 64 MB - system memory shared = 158MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 286MB
  2 GB RAM - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 702MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 830MB shared system memory
  RAM 3 GB - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 1214 MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 1342 MB shared system memory
  4 GB RAM - dedicated video memory = 128 MB - = 1631 MB - TOTAL graphic memory available = 1759 MB shared system memory

  Welcome them

• Satellite L655-11J - result of the memory of the Windows experience index

  The results are
  Processor: 6.9
  Memory RAM: 5.9
  Graphics: 6.7
  G game: 6.7
  Hard disk: 5.9 Toshiba mk5059GSXP

  The result of the memory is too low?

  Hey,.

  Why is the result of memory too low? The score is still good scores even other parts are better.

  In addition, the Windows experience index is not important in my opinion. You can see a few numbers at the end, but what to do with it? I don't see a reason to make such a test if I convinced and satisfied with my computer. Who care about these things other landmarks? ;)

• Higher of Windows Experience Index rating with OLD machines

  I'm a computer technician at the Brazil. I noticed that a few old machines, certain factors, have better performance than current. The difference is not visible in the points leader, but in use. Open programs or install a LOT more quickly. When this happened, the performance index, marks high score for HD as 7.3 for common HDD Samsung F3 (different from normal 5.9). Stroller?
  Anyone know anything about this?

  Examples:

  Machine 1:

  Motherboard: ECS A785GM-M

  Processor: Athlon X 4 640

  RAM: 2 x 2 GB Kingston DDR3 1333 Mhz

  HARD drive: Samsung 1 TB

  HD Wei score: 7.3

  Machine 2:

  Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H

  CPU: Intel i7 2500 K
  RAM: 4 x 4 GB Kingston DD3 1333 Mhz

  HDD: Raid0 2 x HD 1 TB SATA3 SEAGATE 7200 RPM ST100DM003

  HD Wei score: 6.1

  The first machine, "slower" than the second victory of common (open, install, manipulate programs, etc.). In the benchmarks, the second victory. Together with the operating system Windows 7 Professional 64-bit with updated drivers.

  Sorry my bad English.

  Hello VbCrayon,

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community.

  Score index performance Windows (WEI) rates your computer on the five main elements, giving you a number for each. Your base score overall, the one that really counts, is as good as your worst performing component. If your video card and monitor are top of the range, but the capabilities of your processor or memory trolling, the primary partition of WEI will be the same as that obtained by the
  slower part.

  This may not seem fair. But for the average PC user, a low or intermediate Windows experience index score is very good. Your computer will be powerful enough to run the popular Microsoft Office programs (such as Microsoft Word), surf the Internet, store and edit photos, and communicate via a webcam.

  Windows Experience Index measures the capability of the hardware and software of your computer configuration and expresses this measurement as a number called a base score. A higher base score means that your computer will perform better and faster than a computer with a score of lower base, especially when more advanced and resource-intensive tasks running.

  Each hardware component receives an individual under-score. Your computer
  base score is determined by the lowest subscore.
  You can see the following link for more information about Windows Experience Index
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/what-is-Windows-experience-index#what-is-Windows-experience-index=Windows-7
  See also: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-CA/windows7/achieving-a-perfect-windows-experience-index-score-in-windows-7
  Additional information:
  Ways to improve your computer's performance
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/ways-to-improve-your-computers-performance

  Optimize Windows 7 for better performance
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/optimize-Windows-7-for-better-performance
  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Hope this information helps. Please reply with the status so that we can help you.

• In Windows experience Index of my computer's processor performance are increased from 5.8 to 4.7.How can I increase this?

  This Windows experience index per second processor calculations

  1 don't get too concerned about the experience index itself, the methods used to determine these scores is rather crude and produce no good empirical results and should be used only as a general guide.

  Also, the algorithms used are sometimes modified to allow changes in the technology available so can produce slightly different results from a previous run.

  Finally even if the utility is supposed to be able to compensate for other tasks, so it can be influenced by other processor loads may produce lower figures. Make sure the system is in the same State when comparisons.

  Processor performance has limited options to improve. Have you ridden any new memory since the last test?

• Slowered Windows experience graphics Index after adding msata SSD on 13 of Yoga

  Windows experience Index graphics and graphics of games lowered after the addition of extra msata SSD on 13 of Yoga. Before the update I added RAM and which increased my experience of them I added msata SSD 256 GB for my Yoga 13 and then my graphics lowered from 5.1 to 4.7 and memory Index and graphics of games reduced from 6.3 to 6.2 and disc main hard went from 7.8 to 7.7.

  I didn't know that adding additional disk msata influence graphics performance. Please let me know if you think anything that might have caused this decline.

  Hi bsreekanthreddy,

  I tried to look and found a few questions on the WEI scores drop after updates to HW,.

  This thread might be useful.

  http://forums.Lenovo.com/T5/Windows-7-knowledge-base/X201-Windows-experience-index-drops-after-upgra...

  http://forums.Lenovo.com/T5/Windows-7-discussion/Wei-score-dropped-after-RAM-upgrade/m-p/382089

  Hope this helps,

  Cheers!

• Improvement of the basic Windows 7 scores; I need desperate help

  I'm sick and tired of playing games (even 2d games) who hangs out on Windows 7 and not on any other OS.

  I've disabled aero, update drivers, adjusted the display settings and tried a million ways to improve the basis of Windows 7 scores.

  I'm stuck with a 3.1 and games is trolling like a miserable slug. Two days earlier, he jumped to 3.2 and I have seen a massive improvement in 2d games. (teas 2d games that need to run at 60 fps had prieviously ran to 20 to 35 pictures per second. After the jump for 3.2, they ran 40-50 fps)

  Well now, they decided that they wanted to jump down to 3.1 and games act as slop again. I'm starting to become extremely unfortunate to have a Windows 7.

  Help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hi Smbmater99,

  Have you tried to optimize the performance of the operating system?
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/optimize-Windows-7-for-better-performance

  I had similar problems while trying to play games like NFS, HALO 2 for Vista.
  I could solve the problem of cleaning residue from register of older programs that I have not used or removed and the temp. locations.

  You can also try to give it a shot.
  http://www.RegCure.com/
  http://www.Piriform.com/CCleaner
   Note: do not forget to take before cleaning the residue of backup (when prompted).

  After cleaning the computer, try to re - evaluate the Windows experience index.

  Concerning
  Terminator

• For XP Windows experience index. I can't find the SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND after selecting the start and Control Panel.

  I'm following the steps to display the score of our computer trying to open the performance and tools by clicking the Start button, click Control Panel, clicking system and Maintenance , and then clicking Performance Information and Tools. However, I cannot locate the system and Maintenance icon so, therefore, cannot take place.  Maybe this does not apply to our computer?  Yes, we use IE8 and XP Professional.

  Windows XP does not include Windows Experience Index. It is only available in Vista/Win7.

  But there are other tests of performance that allows your computer to reference.

  http://www.CNET.com/topic-software/benchmarking.HTML?tag=Lia; Lcol

  This is a link to several assessment tests. Some are free, others are not.

  Have fun
  DWN2DV8

• Windows experience index

  Recently I restore my laptop to dell factory image and after that my windows experience index becomes lower. Previously, it is 5 but it's now only 4.3.

  I think that the RAM and the processor side has been reduced.

  Hi Murat,

  Do you have Windows 7 service Pack1 after restoring the computer to the original image?

  If it's just the legacy, then you should not get the low rating for Windows Exp Index.

  I suggest you to see the following link:

  Your computer's Windows Experience Index score may change after you install Windows Vista Service Pack 1
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/953286
  
  Method 1: update Windows Experience Index of Control Panel

  To do this, follow these steps:

  (a) click Start.

  (b) right click on computer.

  (c) click on Properties.

  (d) click on Windows Experience Index: not class.

  (e) click Refresh now.

  
  Method 2: Update the Windows performance index at a command prompt

  To do this, follow these steps:

  (a) click Start, type command prompt in the Search box and press ENTER.

  (b) type the following command and press ENTER:

  WinSAT formal

  
  Method 3: After changing the hardware configuration of the computer

  To resolve this problem after you change the hardware configuration of the computer, follow these steps:

  (a) click Start

  (b) type the following path in the Search box, and press ENTER:

  (c) %SYSTEMROOT%\Performance\WinSat\DataStore

  (d) delete all of the .xml files in the folder.

  (e) follow the steps in method 1.

  I suggest update you also the drivers and check.

  Updated a hardware driver that is not working properly

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly