Apparent memory leak in Photoshop

Similar Questions

• Massive memory leak to the Organizer 14 during the processing of faces

  Hello

  I have observed the Organizer 14 huge memory leaks during the processing of faces. My scripts:

  1. the Organizer 13 database with 35 k photos and faces named ~ 45. After the upgrade to v14, organizer began treating faces anew (preservation face name assignments v13). Now, for each photo ~ 6-8 k he consumed ~ 6GB of memory which was not returned to the system, where message memory and OS closing the Organizer. I have confirmed, that it was process organizer who was consumed by memory. I just finished finally all batch processing, and leaks memory have been persistent between the the computer reboots/restarts and restarts organizer - always at the same pace.

  2. After finishing above, I'm done with 12 batteries face k (right - 12 thousand - I have many faces). I started treatment, deciding faces unconfirmed for named faces and piles of face. After an hour or two of work, I'm done with the memory low Message for the Organizer again. What happened only once so far, but I guess because it was my first batch of work after the re-scan.

  Have you noticed something like that? I have screenshots of the Task Manager for the first scenario, and I think that I can easily do some for the second.

  I would like to report somewhere as well?

  TIA & looks

  Suggestion:

  Ask your question in the forum comments:

  Community customer Photoshop family

  and include a link to this discussion.

  I can't help you, I do not use the automatic facial recognition. Only manual.

• String memory leak?

  I've been programming for a while in AS3 and found something really weird with ropes which, without apparent reason, cling on memory, the program below changes just the property label.text with a random string, it works fine but when I looked at the Flex Profiler, I noticed that the number of channels increases steadly, I tried to run the garbage collector , but did not help me.

  What is a memory leak? How can I solve it?

  As I know that this strings must be collected by the garbage collector, because there is no object referring to them, yet this is not the case for all channels.

  Here is the code and a screenshot of the Flex profiler indicating the number of instances of String.

  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:WindowedApplication xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                   xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                   xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" creationComplete="windowedapplication1_creationCompleteHandler(event)">
<s:layout>
    <s:BasicLayout/>
</s:layout>
<fx:Script>
    <![CDATA[
        import mx.events.FlexEvent;

        protected var t:Timer=new Timer(10);

        protected function windowedapplication1_creationCompleteHandler(event:FlexEvent):void
        {
            t.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER,listener,false,0,true);
            t.start();
        }

        protected function listener(e:Event):void
        {
            var s:String=Math.random()+"-->";
            this.fx(s);
            s=null;
        }

        protected function fx(s:String):void
        {
            this.label.text=s;
        }
    ]]>
</fx:Script>
<fx:Declarations>
    <!-- Place non-visual elements (e.g., services, value objects) here -->
</fx:Declarations>
<s:Label id="label" y="39" left="10" right="10" text="Label"/>
</s:WindowedApplication>

  

  Theres no such leaks memory, not answered here

  http://StackOverflow.com/questions/12821553/AS3-string-memory-leak

• Since the upgrade to Sierra MediaLibraryService is causing a memory leak

  Hello.

  I upgraded to Sierra, since as soon as Itunes is launched, the com.apple.medialibraryservice is originally a large memory leak, it keeps in ram more until she takes all (16 GB) and significantly slows down the computer.

  I tried to reset the nvram and smc memory, doesn't change anything.

  Does anyone have an idea on what is causing this leak and is there a solution?

  Yes, I noticed this also. After that I opened iTunes, it's just a matter of time before all the memory gets used up and all departure is wobbly. In particular, bluetooth really gets bug after a certain time, and as soon as I quit iTunes, that's fine.

• There seems to be a MAJOR problem (blocking/memory leak) in "subject: House", also known as the Firefox Start Page, at 26.0 Firefox on Windows!

  There seems to be a MAJOR problem (blocking/memory leak) in "subject: House", also known as start up Firefox, 26.0 Firefox Page, Windows!

  seen on:
  -Windows 7 x 64 machine with 12 GB of RAM and high performance CPU (core i7-920)
  -Comments Machine virtual WinXP SP3 (in Oracle VirtualBox) running on the same computer
  -Intel Atom D525 netbook with 4 GB of RAM, running Win7 x 64

  None of these machines are connected through Sync or something like that. The Firefox instance on the virtual machine is a fresh install / clean.

  The problem:
  -100% of cpu usage for 10 seconds, (util in XP) memory usage goes up to 1.7 GB
  -If "subject: House" is actually the Firefox Start Page, it blocks the computer at startup of Firefox for 10 seconds
  -If "subject: House" isn't the Firefox Start Page, startup is fine - BUT if I press the "home" on the toolbar button it loads "on: House" which causes the same question once again

  Sounds that there is a problem with one of the code snippets that are responsible. I've seen several reports on this issue.

  You can set the browser.aboutHomeSnippets.updateUrl pref an empty string on the subject: the page of config to disable loading (new) checked to see if that helps.
  
  You can open the topic: config page through the address bar

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/about:config

  You must remove the ' storage\moz-security-about + origin "folder in the folder of Firefox to delete already profile stored clips.

  You can use this button to go to the Firefox profile folder:

  • Help > troubleshooting information > profile directory: see file (Linux: open the directory;) Mac: View in the Finder)
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

• On firefox memory leaks cause blue screens?

  On firefox memory leaks cause blue screens?

  If you encounter blue screen crashes, this majority refers often to an incompatibility with a device driver, especially the graphics drivers. Go to Firefox Safe Mode and disable the use of Firefox hardware acceleration of graphics.

  Assuming that Firefox is closed:

  Hold down the SHIFT key when you start Firefox. You should get a small dialog box. Click on 'Start mode safe' (not reset).

  (If Firefox is running, use Help > restart with disabled modules to call the dialog box.)

  In Firefox, open the Options of the Advanced tab dialog box:

  the button Firefox orange (or the Tools menu) > Options > advanced

  In the mini ' General' tab, uncheck the box for "use hardware acceleration when available.

  This will take effect after you exit Firefox and start it up again (in normal mode).

• Firefox memory leak <! DIFFICULTY! >

  Hello fellow Firefox users!

  For most of us, Firefox suffers from a memory leak crazy, this can cause slowdown and perhaps even crashes. This happens mainly because when you close the tabs, the RAM, they took is always taxing your computer. Among other things cause this annoying leakage.

  -SOLUTION-
  Recently, I switched to Firefox and has this leak. I would not put upward with him, so I put solutions. Here's what I came with.

  Some addons I've handpicked, which when combined, are extremely effective.

  RAMBack
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/RAMBack/?src=SS

  MemoryFox
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/memory-Fox/?src=search

  MemoryRestart 1.1
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/memory-restart/?src=SS

  -IN ADDITION-
  Firefox slow acting? Try these great modules!

  SpeedFox 0.9.11
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/speedfox/?src=search

  DownThemAll
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/DownThemAll/?src=search
  ________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  Get all these together and make a leak free and faster Firefox!

  Additional details of the system

     Windows Vista
     Firefox 9.0.1
  

  More information

  Front of Add-ons
  Firefox could take up to 512 MB and up, leading to problems.
  Firefox could take some time to load the tabs sometimes.
  Download was OK.
  After Add-ons
  Use Firefox NEVER more than 512 MB, typically stays around 300 MB.
  Firefox almost NEVER slows down.
  Downloads go up to 4 x the average speed.
  ______________________________________________________________________________
  Computer information
  Windows Vista
  4 GB of ram Ram HQ
  Firefox version 9
  3.0 MHZ AMDPhenII QuadCore
  NIVIDIA, VideoRAM 2048 DDR2

• Satellite U500 memory leak - 18 p

  I have PSU8CE 18 p Satellite U500 with preinstalled Windows7 Home Premium x 64 with 4 GB RAM. When I start mode safe then memory not sunk. When I start it in Normal mode then nonpaged kernel memory develops up to 3011 MB (~ 4 days running).
  
  I downloaded poolmon.exe and Crescent pool tag found: "AmlH" (ACPI AMLI Pooltags). In safe mode, this pool has 1 single allocation unit. In Normal Mode ~ every 73 seconds he returned new unit. Size of each unit is 524288 bytes.
  
  Then I downloaded and installed "Windows Performance Toolkit" and run xperf.exe and xperfview.exe according to
  
  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/maartenb/archive/2010/12/07/debugging-pool-leaks-with-x-perf.aspx.
  
  XperfView watch battery to leak memory in the
  
  Rootntkrnlmp.exe! KxStartSystemThread/ntkrnlmp.exe! PspSystemThreadStartup/ACPI.sys! ACPIWorkerThread/ACPI.sys! RestartCtxtPassive/ACPI.sys! InsertReadyQueue/ACPI.sys! RunContext/ACPI.sys! ParseTerm/ACPI.sys! Return/ACPI.sys! DupObjData/ACPI.sys! NewObjData/ACPI.sys! HeapAlloc/ACPI.sys! NewHeap/ntkrnlmp.exe! ExAllocatePoolWithTag
  
  I restored windows to State factory but still present memory leak.

  Memory leaks are a common error in programming.
  leak memory occurs when a computer program consumes memory, but is unable to release it in the operating system.

  In your case, it would be necessary to know what application or process that runs in the background do
  This can be very long process you would need to install a system of fees will need to check the memory leak after each installation of driver or another application

• My Macbook Pro reboots after a memory leak every two hours

  Hey everybody. I'm having a problem with my MacBook Pro (retina, mid-2012), where he is recovering in market (usually after gel). In this case only (so far) while using Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 (to date). I also use a Wacom tablet (intuos 4, with latest drivers), drawing, which can also be the culprit.

  This happened with Yosemite, so I had upgraded to El Capitan - that does not solve the problem.

  I apologize if the problem is with myself! I get that this problem is probably the fault of Wacom, Adobe or myself - I just want to see what you think Mac-heads.

  Thanks a lot, a lot in advance for any advice - I appreciate any help I can get.

  The report I get, when restarting is as follows:

  Mon 4 Jan 20:19:13 2016

  Panic report *.

  panic (the appellant UC 7 0xffffff802d928e44): "zalloc: map of exhausted area during the allocation of the buf.8192 area, probably because of the memory leak in the area kalloc.512 (1063772160 bytes, 2076706 elements allocated)"@/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/xnu/xnu-3247.1.106/osfmk/kern /zalloc.c:2543.

  Backtrace (CPU 7), Frame: Return address

  0xffffff813887b150: 0xffffff802d8e5357

  0xffffff813887b1d0: 0xffffff802d928e44

  0xffffff813887b300: 0xffffff802daea851

  0xffffff813887b330: 0xffffff802dae8f19

  0xffffff813887b380: 0xffffff802dae8a23

  0xffffff813887b450: 0xffffff802daea040

  0xffffff813887b4b0: 0xffffff802dcf76fb

  0xffffff813887b520: 0xffffff802dd4cdfb

  0xffffff813887b5c0: 0xffffff802dd47845

  0xffffff813887b6d0: 0xffffff802dcfe66b

  0xffffff813887bc10: 0xffffff802dd3e695

  0xffffff813887bd20: 0xffffff802db112f2

  0xffffff813887bde0: 0xffffff802db1ce7c

  0xffffff813887bf30: 0xffffff802db11747

  0xffffff813887bf60: 0xffffff802de2ace1

  0xffffff813887bfb0: 0xffffff802d9f4896

  The process corresponding to the current thread BSD name: softwareupdated

  Mac OS version:

  15A 284

  Kernel version:

  Darwin Kernel Version 15.0.0: Wed Sep 26 16:57:32 PDT 2015; root:XNU-3247.1.106~1/RELEASE_X86_64

  Kernel UUID: 37BC582F-8BF4-3F65-AFBB-ECF792060C68

  Slide kernel: 0x000000002d600000

  Text of core base: 0xffffff802d800000

  Text __HIB base: 0xffffff802d700000

  Name of system model: MacBookPro10, 1 (Mac-C3EC7CD22292981F)

  Availability of the system in nanoseconds: 7390442512484

  Area name heart size free size

  VM 146329200 960 items

  machine virtual object hash 24008000 2240 c'entri

  VM 46592000 883520 map entries

  34959024 5424 pv_list

  VM 130327232 8768 pages

  16598128 27424 Kalloc.16

  16876000 21664 Kalloc.32

  77735808 199344 Kalloc.48

  Kalloc.64 37787264 95360

  2136000 5280 Kalloc.80

  Kalloc.96 1729824 67200

  Kalloc.128 130555904 30464

  1941600 135680 Kalloc.160

  133074944 292352 Kalloc.256

  45504 142195392 Kalloc.288

  1063772160 498688 Kalloc.512

  1003634688 2931712 Kalloc.1024

  6909952 24576 Kalloc.2048

  Kalloc.4096 9760768 0

  Kalloc.8192 10452992 0

  9606272-3968 mem_obj_control

  SCHED groups 1270080 36288

  IPC 81922240 150880 ports

  2081376 274480 discussions

  x 86 fpsave State 1411072 233792

  uthreads 1224752 209264

  31705680 2640 nodes

  12949920 4032 namecache

  Node 42278544 72816 HFS

  Fork 8548352 896 HFS

  1109304 1176 decmpfs_cnode

  buf.8192 23584768 0

  ubc_info area 5679696 6600

  vnode pager 2580000 1320 structur

  34320384 44864 compressor_pager

  20094976 5986304 compressor_segment

  The 3653632 kernel stacks

  PageTables 250183680

  Kalloc.Large 166412827

  Backtrace suspected leakage: (bytes pending: 206848)

  0xffffff802d92927f

  0xffffff802de3be0b

  0xffffff7fafdd2718

  0xffffff7fafd724e0

  0xffffff7fafd5e0f6

  0xffffff7fafd635a4

  0xffffff7fafd64578

  0xffffff802dee1657

  0xffffff802d9a0780

  0xffffff802d8e9af3

  0xffffff802d8cd448

  0xffffff802d8dcfc5

  0xffffff802d9c135a

  Extensions of core in backtrace:

  com.apple.iokit.IOAcceleratorFamily2 (203.7.1) [5178DF8C-1F96-3D 87-8BD4-46B996C41 84A]@0xffffff7fafd4e000-> 0xffffff7fafdb9fff

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily (2.9) [668E3DEE-F98E-3456-92D6-F4FEEA355A72] @ 7fae12d000 0xffffff

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily (2.4.1) [48AC8EA9-BD3C-3FDC-908D-09850215AA32] @0 xffffff7fae4a2000

  com.apple.GeForce (10.0.6) [7246A48B-E43B-3AF3-8285-8E793AE55B8C] @0xffffff7fafdc8 000-> 0xffffff7fafe64fff

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily (2.9) [668E3DEE-F98E-3456-92D6-F4FEEA355A72] @ 7fae12d000 0xffffff

  dependency: ffff7fae4e9000 @0xff com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport (2.4.1) [814A7F4B-03EF-384A-B205-9840F0594421]

  dependency: com.apple.nvidia.driver.NVDAResman (10.0.6) [E177026A-B6F5-30AB-BF87-8ADC4D102278] @0xffffff7fae4ff000

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily (2.4.1) [48AC8EA9-BD3C-3FDC-908D-09850215AA32] @0 xffffff7fae4a2000

  dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOAcceleratorFamily2 (203.7.1) [5178DF8C-1F96-3D 87-8BD4-46B996C41 84A]@0xffffff7fafd4e000

  last load kext to 510536257340: com.apple.driver.AppleXsanScheme 3 (addr 0xffffff7fb0a11000 size 32768)

  Finally unloaded kext to 584400762104: com.apple.driver.AppleXsanScheme 3 (addr 0xffffff7fb0a11000 size 32768)

  kexts responsible:

  com.apple.driver.AudioAUUC 1.70

  com.apple.driver.AppleHWSensor 1.9.5d0

  com.apple.driver.AGPM 110.20.19

  com.apple.driver.ApplePlatformEnabler 2.5.1d0

  com.apple.driver.X86PlatformShim 1.0.0

  com Apple.filesystems.autofs 3.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyHIDDriver 124

  com.apple.driver.AppleOSXWatchdog 1

  com.apple.driver.AppleMikeyDriver 272.50

  com Apple.Driver.pmtelemetry 1

  com.apple.driver.AppleHDA 272.50

  com.apple.iokit.IOUserEthernet 1.0.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothSerialManager 4.4.0f4

  com.apple.driver.AppleUpstreamUserClient 3.6.1

  com.apple.Dont_Steal_Mac_OS_X 7.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelHD4000Graphics 10.0.8

  com.apple.GeForce 10.0.6

  com.apple.driver.AppleHV 1

  com.apple.iokit.BroadcomBluetoothHostControllerUSBTransport 4.4.0f4

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMCPDRC 1.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltIP 3.0.8

  com.apple.driver.AppleLPC 3.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMCLMU 208

  com.apple.driver.AppleMCCSControl 1.2.13

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelFramebufferCapri 10.0.8

  com.apple.driver.AppleMuxControl 3.11.31

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelSlowAdaptiveClocking 4.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCButtons 245,4

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBTCKeyboard 245,4

  com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeDataless 1.0.0d1

  com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib 1.0.0

  com.apple.BootCache 37

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage 2.8.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleSDXC 1.7.0

  com.apple.driver.AirPort.Brcm4360 1000.13.1a3

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBEHCIPCI 1.0.1

  3.1.5 com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons 4.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleSmartBatteryManager 161.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleRTC 2.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleHPET 1.8

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS 2.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC 4.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC 1.7

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient 218.0.0

  com Apple.NKE.applicationfirewall 163

  com Apple.Security.Quarantine 3

  com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet 8

  com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement 218.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleBluetoothHIDKeyboard 181

  com.apple.driver.IOBluetoothHIDDriver 4.4.0f4

  com.apple.driver.AppleHIDKeyboard 181

  com Apple.kext.Triggers 1.0

  com.apple.driver.DspFuncLib 272.50

  com.apple.kext.OSvKernDSPLib 525

  com.apple.iokit.IOSerialFamily 11

  com.apple.iokit.IOSurface 108.0.1

  com.apple.nvidia.driver.NVDAGK100Hal 10.0.6

  com.apple.nvidia.driver.NVDAResman 10.0.6

  com.apple.driver.CoreCaptureResponder 1

  com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothHostControllerUSBTransport 4.4.0f4

  com.apple.iokit.IOBluetoothFamily 4.4.0f4

  com.apple.driver.AppleHDAController 272.50

  com.apple.iokit.IOHDAFamily 272.50

  com.apple.iokit.IOAudioFamily 203.8

  com.apple.vecLib.kext 1.2.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusPCI 1.0.14d1

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMBusController 1.0.14d1

  com.apple.iokit.IOAcceleratorFamily2 203.7.1

  com.apple.AppleGraphicsDeviceControl 3.11.31

  com.apple.driver.AppleBacklightExpert 1.1.0

  com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport 2.4.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleGraphicsControl 3.11.31

  com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily 2.4.1

  com.apple.driver.X86PlatformPlugin 1.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleSMC 3.1.9

  com.apple.driver.IOPlatformPluginFamily 6.0.0d7

  com.apple.iokit.IOSlowAdaptiveClockingFamily 1.0.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily 3.7.7

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMultitouch 250.4

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver 900.4.1

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHostCompositeDevice 1.0.1

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBHub 1.0.1

  com.apple.driver.CoreStorage 517

  com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPInAdapter 4.1.2

  com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltDPAdapterFamily 4.1.2

  com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltPCIDownAdapter 2.0.2

  com.apple.driver.AppleThunderboltNHI 4.0.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOThunderboltFamily 5.0.6

  com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family 1100.23

  com.apple.driver.mDNSOffloadUserClient 1.0.1b8

  com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily 3.2

  com Apple.Driver.corecapture 1.0.4

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBEHCI 1.0.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily 2.8.0

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCIPCI 1.0.1

  com.apple.driver.usb.AppleUSBXHCI 1.0.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily 900.4.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHostFamily 1.0.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHostMergeProperties 1.0.1

  com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM 2.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily 2.0.0

  com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime 2.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily 1.1

  com Apple.Security.sandbox 300.0

  com.apple.kext.AppleMatch 1.0.0d1

  com.apple.driver.AppleKeyStore 2

  com.apple.driver.AppleMobileFileIntegrity 1.0.5

  com.apple.driver.AppleCredentialManager 1.0

  com.apple.driver.DiskImages 414

  com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily 2.1

  com.apple.iokit.IOReportFamily 31

  com.apple.driver.AppleFDEKeyStore 28.30

  com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform 4.0

  com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily 2.9

  com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily 1.4

  com.apple.kec.Libm 1

  com Apple.KEC.pthread 1

  com Apple.KEC.corecrypto 1.0

  Panic report suggests that the issue is in the video/graphis material. Please make an appointment at the Apple Store - Genius Bar store and bring it into service. If you are in the United States or is unable to make an appointment in this way, contact your Apple store.

• Defective touchpad (Synaptics) and slow computer after extended use (memory leak)

  Two problems have been caused with my HP Split 2 x since I bought it 2 months ago:

  (1) the touchpad works sometimes for a few seconds, while the touchscreen still work OK.

  (2) the computer becomes slow after a while of use (which varies from a few minutes to a few hours usually). The Task Manager shows 98%-99% of memory, most of which use (3.6 GB / 4 GB) are not paged memory.

  I suspect the two issues are related to a faulty Synaptics driver, according to:

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/notebook-operating-systems-and-software/envy-X2-non-paged-pool-memory-l...

  and http://forum.notebookreview.com/razer/731374-memory-leak-synaptics-driver.html .

  I did the same test as the second link with the same result: Open "Task Manager" (Ctrl-Shift-Esc), on the 'Performance' tab, select 'memory '. Note the value for "Non paged memory. If I move the touchpad, it increases to about 1 MB every 5 seconds. If I stop moving, the value remains constant.

  I use the preinstalled Synaptics driver, version 17.0.10.9 (Sep 06, 2013) for 64-bit 8.1 window.

  Everyone has the same problem, or use it without these issues?

  I would like to know if a restoration system or factory reset may fix.

  FINALLY!

  Microsoft has just released an update for Synaptics Driver, not thanks to HP which has not found a way to provide the possible Synaptics driver as an OEM update.

  Update Windows Update to Sypatics HD TouchPad two days ago, but I would not be allowed to install as it kept then mainly in giving the 800F0100 error Code. After some research on the Internet I could find that an installation manual after the WU has downloaded the driver would be possible.

  So I went to the Device Manager > mice and other pointing devices > TouchPad Synaptics HID > properties > driver > Update Driver > Browse my computer for driver software and shown the finger/windows/C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution/Download and everything worked like a charm = D

  I have no more memory leak and now after SEVEN MONTHS I finally can use gestures that it was supposed to.

  But I still annoyed gel problems which in my case is a dysfunction between the screen and the dock.

  Just that you wanted the guys at Microsoft to know is the solution, not the HP that would have had if they have signed and put the driver since November last at our disposal. Blame it on you, HP.

  Leo

• UDP/Lakes memory leaks?

  I wonder if anyone has had problems with memory leaks/Lakes when you use UDP and data queues?

  The program has a section of code where the queues are loaded with the data read from different UDP ports. The queues are then read by a loop (which is triggered by a source of synchronization of 1 kHz) and some of the data is displayed on the Panel before the main VI. When the program runs it loses memory about 100 Kbps leading to a failure in about 4-5 hours, when the physical RAM is at its maximum.

  I think that I traced the question (using the DETT it shows several memory allocation operations) to the Subvi I join which fills the queues. Can anyone help to emphasize something that could lead to leaks of memory/Lakes?

  Thank you!

  I suspect that the problem is that you are not emptying queues quickly enough. And is not in the code you have posted. There's also a few subVIs, classes, and controls.

  Usually call loops should only be used on real-time operating systems. They offer no advantage over the standard while loop and have an additional charge when using a desktop OS. Also placing indicators within the quick loops can create problems. The operating system does not update the screen dozens of times per second, so wrote indicators 1000 times per second LV forces or the operating system, or both to manipulate data.

  Having multiple synchronization methods in a loop can lead to problems.  UDP timeout is probably based on the clock count of ticks. If you have the timeout of read of the UPD defined with a value greater than zero, the UDP bed may take longer than the timed loop interval.  The timeout of read UDP allows a wait in a standard while loop.

  Lynn

• Memory leak with RS-485 visa

  I tried to find a slow memory leak in a large application Labview (2012f3). Using perfmon, probes and breakpoints, I could trace the source of the leak of a series VI communication employing a number of nodes VISA. I have attached a slightly simplified version of the VI leaking (serialCommand.vi), as well as a VISA vi initialization and a VI of container to test.

  Did anyone see any problems with the serialCommand VI that could possibly cause memory leak?

  After reading all posts of the forum that I could find on memory leaks and VISA error, I was still unable to stop the leak. SomeofthethingsI'vetriedsofar:

  -J' read VISA Close can cause leaks memory, so I disabled inside the loop (even if he was closing an event, not the port)

  -J' wrote extra carriage at the beginning of the VI returns, before rinsing the pads

  -J' was initially using VISA 5.2; After the upgrade to VISA 5.3, the leak occurred still

  -J' replaced VISA nodes with constant value placeholders, and the leak repaired (not a solution, but the confirmation that it is the location of the leak)

  It may also be worth noting that I don't remember when this leak memory in the previous development when I was watching for leaks, but a few days ago Labview executable generates started fails with the error 1, and the only way to get Labview to successfully build again should fix labview from Add/Remove Programs (Win 7 Ultimate) , so it could be related to a change of version in one of the packages that has been reinstalled.

  Thank you.

  Is there a reason that you use VISA events?  It seems that you expect just a character.  Why not to use playback VISA wait for a byte and use the timeout if the byte is not?

• tool tip memory leak

  Seems to be leaking memory associated with ToolTips.  Every time I put your mouse on a panel using tool tips I see case the dynamic memory usage constantly increases.  If I comment out the call to the functions of the tool tip (i.e. SetCtrlToolTipAttribute), memory leak disappears.

  There is no patch for 8.0.0, if it is tell you.

  But from the Toolbox of the programming interface is open-source, you can easily fix it yourself:

  The 8.0.0 3365 online version of C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\CVI80\toolslib\toolbox\toolbox.c, you need to add the function call following ListDispose:

  If (RectContainsPoint (bounds, point))
  {
  PointConvertCoordinates (Panel, child, & point, FALSE);
  ListDispose (sortedChildren);
  Return PointToPanel (child, point);
  }

  After you make the change, you will have to recompile the file (Options > create a file object) to regenerate the object file and restart CVI.

  Luis

• LabView VB6 Dll interface causes memory leak

  Hello

  We use a large written in vb6 in our laboratory measurement built house software. Recently, we have added a new detector that is read using a labview vi that is called using a dll directly from vb6. Here, we call the function for example of read_detector which starts the collection of data and in a next step writes the data to a string. When you have finished the called function returns a pointer to the string and its length. VB6, we read this pointer and process data.

  This is a memory leak. This could be the case because we presets not memory for labview to write in and so just writing lab data in memory without releasing again? In the current configuration, the function of the dll is just called again and again and each lab view creates a variable outputstring.

  If we allocate the memory. How can we achieve for vb6?

  Best,

  Julian

  Well first of all, a handful of string LabVIEW is a very specific type of data LabVIEW. Not only is only LabVIEW himself knows exactly how to allocate and deallocate, but you must also allocate and deallocate in exactly the same instance of LabVIEW. Given that your LabVIEW DLL is executed for this purpose inside the DLL to run LabVIEW, you must also recover the LabVIEW memory manager functions according to DSDisposeHandle() of the lvrt.dll and call it after you are finished with the strings returned by the DLL function. This is however made very complicated since there are circumstances where not lvrt.dll is actually used by your DLL but another LabVIEW runtime system. And if you happen to have two DLLs created with different versions of LabVIEW LabVIEW, each of them will load and use its enforcement LabVIEW system according to DLL load next. Believe me, you don't want to know how next dll works and how to make this opportunity to work in an application. This is the way for Microsoft to create a monster to manage the hell of the DLL and in this way, rather to create exponential version of hell.

  You create just two memory leaks for each call of DLL function at the moment. LabVIEW creates a new handle of string for each of the parameters string at each call, you dereference the pointer, and then copy the contents into a SysString. But you let the chain handles LabVIEW blow created around the stack and the next your function call, you initialize the new variables of the battery which is initialized to null and LabVIEW creates two new handles. Also you need to do is to define an "Integer DSDisposeHandle(LStrHandle As Long)" exported lvrt.dll function and call it once you have copied the data of the handle in your SysString for both of these handles.

  But basically calling a DLL LabVIEW from no LabVIEW code and using LabVIEW handles string or array as parameters is several times more trouble that it's worth. The easiest would be fair, allocate a large enough buffer beforehand and pass those to the Configuration of the service DLL LabVIEW function to not accept a handful of string LabVIEW but a pointer to a string C instead. Do you work around the problem on the memory allocated by someone else to worry about your own program of VB and duty he properly release. The disadvantage of this approach is, that you should make sure that the memory allocated buffer is large enough for the maximum possible length that your DLL function may never return.

  But another approach might be to leave out LabVIEW total here and call the DAQmx APIs directly from VB.

• TDMS write memory leak

  I use TDMS to store test data that seems to be causing a memory leak in my (very convincingly) program. Below is a graph of the three versions of my program. Series 1 uses storing data open PDM, the data file added and closed every 5 seconds. Series 2 uses storing data PDM with a referense remaining open during operation and closed at the end 3 series written data in a CSV file. The charts show the use of LabVIEW memory each seconde.5 ~ 4 hours of a 10 hour test.

  LabVIEW 8.6.1

  Windows XP SP3

  

  Further explanations... when a TDMS file is opened, LabVIEW will create an index in memory structure that is used for random access to the file. The Streaming API integrated LabVIEW TDM will always create the index, even if you just write. The size of the index is not dependent on the size of the file, but on how fragmented file is. If you store a relatively small number of large blocks of data, the index will be very low. If you keep adding small amounts of data on your record, it could make big enough. A cure for this is the property of NI_MinimumBufferSize. You can set this property on a channel to the LabVIEW to a number of values of the buffer before storing. In this way, data from multiple calls to 'Write TDMS' counts as a data segment in the file. Typical values for this are 1000 or 10000. Fragmentation of files and memory footprint are reduced accordingly, but LabVIEW uses little memory for buffers.

  If all else fails and you do not have access to the file of reading while you write, you can also use the VI-based TDMS API. This will not build the structure of the index that I mentioned above, so there should be no increase in memory at all. In this case, I recommend to defragment files front of post-processing.

  Hope that helps,

  Herbert