Apply improved encryption policy

Similar Questions

• apply the group policy for the screen saver without copying the screen saver on all computers

  Hello
  I have applied the group policy for server screen saver 2008 but do run
  I copied the file on each computer .scr.
  is there a way to push file of screen directly from the server without copying it to each computer on the network?
  or is there a software that can automatically run the screensaver on the network?

  Hello

  The business support, you can find forums on TechNet, see the following links:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/w7itpro/

• Is it necessary to create additional rules not permitted for uses such as Regedit.exe etc when applying software restriction policy?

  Is it necessary to create additional rules not permitted for uses such as Regedit.exe etc when applying software restriction policy?

  Hello

  Please visit the following link. This should explain the software restriction policies in detail.

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457006.aspx

• Windows Mail cannot synchronize emails account exchange says "Allow windows to apply the security policy to this PC.

  I set up an exchange account on Windows Mail on Windows 8 Pro. It syncs all e-mail said to synchronize 'your account '. you will need to change this PC settings to match the security policy of the mail server. See how to "allow windows to apply the security policy to this PC. now I can't find an option where I can leave my exchange server apply security policies. How can I achieve this.

  Screenshot - http://sdrv.ms/U3RObM

  PS: my exchange account works perfectly on iPhone/iPad and Windows Phone 7.5.

  That left me speechless for a long time, but I think I just found a workaround that is may be what many of you who support companies can search for.

  End users as admins have them is a complete no, no.  I can't have that, it is unacceptable.  It dawned on me that if I had to turn an ordinary windows app, perhaps I could temporarily raise so that the app can run and perform it requires registry settings.  I did some research and found that you can run the command prompt mail application.  I intend to make a race package once I deploy to my end users that I want to set up this app that launches the application as a local administrator, let's configure them it, accept the screen of "Enforcing policy" and get synchronization started.  Once the installation program, they have more need the application to run as the local administrator.  However, I did a lot of tests and I found that I needed to 'Allow no devices configurable' active too.

  Here's the command line on the mail application starts.  Test launch invite command as a local administrator of a standard user account and type:

  Start ms-mail:

  Script by far you want!  It is not ideal, but it will do.  Do not forget the colon after Microsoft mail.  It is necessary.

• Apply the password policy when you reset password

  I want to apply password history, age Minimum and age Maximum while resetting the password in Active Directory. There is no way to do before resetting the password being an administrative activity, but it's in the news that we can apply this policy even as the password reset. I just want to know if it's true, how we can do it, or by using the attributes that?

  Hello

  I suggest you post your query on the TechNet forums to get help. Consult the following link:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home

  It will be useful.

• Apply local security policy to an another Win XP

  Can I just copy the secpol.msc since a Win XP to an another Win XP in order to overwrite the target XP local security policy settings?

  A better approach would be to use ' secedit/Export' and ' secedit/import ".

  For more information:

  Start-> Help and Support-> Type "Secedit" in the "Search" window, press return
  Click on "Secedit" in the result window.

  HTH,
  JW

• Group Policy (Windows Server 2012)

  I am using Microsoft Server R2 Standard Edition 2012. I facing ' am question is, I applied a group policy, to block all USB ports on computers in the domain. So without knowing it also applied to the servers in the network. After a while I had to disable the NIC in the server and hit restart. To my great surprise, the group policy is applied, and I am unable to use same USB keyboard and mouse after the restart of the process to the Welcome screen.

  Please post your query to:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/

  Server issues are better addressed there.

• Signature CSM policy

  I want to apply a consistent policy of signing on several routers using IOS IPS and managed by a Cisco Security Manager. I created the new policy, and the signatures are configured in a default manner. I would like to do the equivalent of the category 'all' and ' retires true ' commands then begins to build my contract but I can't figure out how.

  Is there a way to withdraw from all the signatures and then the UN-withdraw signatures/categories that relate to my environment? Also modify them individually, of course.

  I managed only devices IDS by WSC, so this may not be accurate for you, but you can select several lines and then right-click to change actions (note that it's important on the field in which you right click).

• Crypto can be applied by entering ethernet interface.

  Hello

  We try to form a VPN tunnel between two routers connected by point-to-point link between two hosts on part and on the other. (host A to router LAN A to host b. router lan B). We have tunnel successfully implemented by the application cryptographic cards for two series of routers interfaces. Data from host a to host B by this tunnel formed on the serial interfaces.

  This is, what serial link toggle ISDN backup takes and data are transferred via ISDN link, as crypto is not applied to the ISDN data past unencrypted. To work around this situation, is possible to apply the crypto to fastethernet interfaces of routers, in this case the data that can go by series or ISDN, it will be permanently encrypted.

  The configuration is very simple.

  We establish the tunnnel as address serial peer, can we put peer as ethernet addrsss addrees and form the tunnel.

  We tried, but it doesn't work.

  Any link on cisco.com is much appreciated.

  Thankx in advance

  Subodh

  Hi Subodh

  You must apply the encryption on the BRI interface card too so that also your crossing of data through the IRB gets encrypted.

  I feel in this case, you must create another card encryption with similar parameters so that you can apply the same on BRI interface.

  regds

• BitLocker encrypted drive. How can I access it?

  Hello. I recently used Bitlocker to encrypt my external 1 to transcend hard drive. I got the recovery file, but then I had to format it because my computer was slow unexcpectedly. Unfortunately, before formatting my computer, I removed the password that will be used to unlock the drive, and I have not saved the file of recovery as well. I have now lost all my files that I can't access my hard drive without recovery. Is there something I can do?

  When you select BitLocker, you did because you assumed that no one could crack her if he didn't have the recovery file. Your assumption is correct. BitLocker does not distinguish between the owner (you) and a thief. He cares only the recovery file. Sorry to say.

  Before applying the encryption, it is essential to examine the situation of your PC is destroyed or stolen. You should ask yourself: I would always be able to access my encrypted media?

• Issue of data policy drafting

  Hi, how can I apply for a policy of writing to multiple users, for example the code below

  DBMS_REDACT. () ADD_POLICY

  object_schema = > "TEST1."

  object_name = > "redacttest"

  column_name = > "credit_card"

  column_description = > 'credit card column can. "

  POLICY_NAME = > "redact_test_credit_comm"

  policy_description = > 'partially redacts the credit_card column. "

  function_type = > DBMS_REDACT. PARTIAL,

  function_parameters = > '9,1,6',

  expression = > 'SYS_CONTEXT ("USERENV", "SESSION_USER") = "TEST2" ');

  Like the code, I can only apply the strategy to use TEST2, how I apply this policy to user TEST2, TEST3, TEST4 and TEST5... so now

  Thank you

  DBMS_REDACT. () ADD_POLICY

  object_schema-online "TEST1."

  object_name-online "redacttest."

  column_name-online "credit_card"

  column_description-online "credit card column can."

  POLICY_NAME-online "redact_test_credit_comm."

  policy_description-online "partially redacts the credit_card column."

  function_type-online DBMS_REDACT. PARTIAL,

  function_parameters-online '9,1,6',

  expression => "SYS_CONTEXT ("USERENV","SESSION_USER") in ("TEST2","TEST3")");

• QoS on each device in the path network?

  Hello

  Apologies, as I'm new to QoS, but it's something I can't find a clear answer too,

  I understand the notion of quality of service on the routers, it's usually the field I see QoS easally passing in the form of WAN links tend to be 10 MB/20 MB etc., so we need to prioritize the traffic as these links can congested bandwidth.

  I understand the use of the class / political cards to identify traffic and bandwidth priority, and then apply the service policy to the output interface on the interface that connects to the WAN link.

  We need quality of service on the local network that connects to the Wan? Even switches layer 2? ... is by port, how to identify traffic at the switch level and give priority to it?

  Help, please!

  Thank you

  Disclaimer

  The author of this announcement offers the information in this publication without compensation and with the understanding of the reader that there is no implicit or explicit adequacy or adaptation to any purpose. Information provided is for information purposes only and should not be interpreted as making the professional advice of any kind. Use information from this announcement is only at risk of the reader.

  RESPONSIBILITY

  Any author will be responsible for any wha2tsoever of damage and interest (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profits) arising out of the use or inability to use the information in the view even if author has been advised of the possibility of such damages.

  Poster

  I'm not a supporter of QoS from end to end, just because you can, either that's what suggests '' the book. ''  There is a cost for their maintenance and QoS implementations, and if done correctly, QoS can degrade service.

  Where you should have QoS is on any interface where forms of congestion it is unfavourable to of the application serve the needs and which may be updated by QoS.  (Sometimes the 'right' solution is more bandwidth, although often more bandwidth is achieved when the quality of service could be a more optimal).

  Often, there are undesirable congestion on WAN interfaces, because as you note, they provide less bandwidth LAN interfaces.  (Also WAN bandwidth is also often more expensive to provide than the LAN bandwidth).

  Placing the QoS on the interfaces that don't really need, it's a bit like buying insurance.  It adds to your "cost", but offers "protection" for the unexpected.  Once again, as if you must buy insurance, for which coverage and cost, QoS implementations should also take into account coverage and expected benefit vs cost.

  So...

  We need quality of service on the local network that connects to the Wan?

  Maybe, maybe not, but also again, often if you do not need effective QoS, LAN to WAN is a common place.

  Even switches layer 2?

  Another maybe, maybe not.

  ... is by port, how to identify traffic at the switch level and give priority to it?

  In fact how depends on the device.

  Often, you have a policy of penetration which examines the traffic, and based on what it "sees" could allow the self marked traffic to go markedly or brand/note traffic according to the needs.

  Device can have the exit policy that determines how the traffic is processed, including priorities, when there is congestion.

  The thing to understand about QoS is to respond to the needs of your traffic, made service by managing the queuing traffic and lozenges.

  QoS often becomes a point of discussion when dealing with VoIP.  However, not all needs of VoIP QoS in all cases and even cases such as data transfers in bulk, could be improved in QoS.

  Unfortunately, QoS corresponds with the old cliché, "can't see the forest for the trees".  Most hardware QoS explains how to treat the 'trees', but does not explain how the forest should be managed.

• The configuration of the coast DMVPN speaks with higher bandwidth for traffic shaping

  Dear all,

  We have the unusual situation that on our sites talking DMVPN has a higher bandwidth (33 Mbps) that our

  DMVPN Hub Site.

  Therefore, we must apply to 10 Mbps on the interface of tunnel on the radius of traffic shaping.

  The following link describes only how to make an application in the form at the end of the hub, but not on the site of end spoke:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/sec_secure_connectivity/configuration/guide/sec_per_tunnel_qos.PDF

  How to proceed with this on the router spoke?

  Creating a service policy and applying then to the tunnel interface will do the job? Put in shape will be before or after encrypting the traffic?

  And then we would need to increase the buffer size of 1024 to something more replay window?

  The following example would work? We would apply the outbound policy to the Tunnel interface:

  class-map match-any CLASS_ANY

   match any 

  policy-map POLICY_SHAPE10MEG

   class CLASS_ANY

    shape average 10000000

  
  
  interface Tunnel 0
  
  service-policy output POLICY_SHAPE10MEG
  
  

  Thanks for your help,

  Thorsten

  I see on the hub strategy is applied successfully on the tunnel. The political POL_SHAPE10MEG is applied on the tunnel you wanted, this way the rays won't be able to consume even if the bandwidth of the hub it has higher bandwidth.

• ASA 5520 IPSEC L2L and ACL

  Just a quick question.  I have two ASA with a vpn site-to-site tunnel built between them.  One is the Central Administration

  site and the other is a remote site.   On the remote site, I have the following IP as local hosts:

  192.168.1.5

  192.168.1.6

  192.168.1.55

  Those workstations attempt to access networks according to destination

  10.1.1.0 24

  10.1.2.0 24

  10.1.3.0 24

  In my interesting traffic on the remote end, I set myself to use

  IP 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0---> 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  On the side of the Central Headquarters, my interesting traffic looks like

  IP 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0---> 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  So now I'm encrypting IP traffic between 10.1.0.0 24 16 to 192.168.1.0.   This part works very well.    But now I want to put an ACL

  the tunnel to allow ONLY 3 hosts on the 192.168.1.x on some ports for 3 subnets.   This is done by group policy for a tunnel from Lan Lan 2.  If I apply a group policy and define a filter of IPV4.  This will accomplish what I'm shooting?

  I am doing this on the ASDM, so keep this in mind when you try to explain to me how to solve this problem.

  Thanks in advance,

  I should stay in bed...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9a87.shtml

• Losing the ability to telnet after crypto card

  Hello

  I have 2 Configuration of DSL routers with a VPN tunnel between them. The VPN works great. Before you configure the tunnel, I got telnet/SSH access. However, when I apply the encryption card to the Dialer interface, I lose the ability to telnet/SSH to the router. If I remove the VPN configuration, I find the ability to telnet/SSH.

  Any thoughts? I was wondering if the fact of the Dialer interface is a logical interface which causes problems?

  Thank you.

  Tony

  The first thing that stands out is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP access-group 100 to

  interface Dialer0

  IP access-group 100 to

  You don't have a 100 ACL in your config file. I would define an ACL for the inside interface based on security policy and apply the inspection on this interface to set the way back (temporary dynamic holes in the firewall).

  Similarly, configure an ACL for the external interface enabling connections SSH ISAKMP and ESP launched on this side, with inspection to configure the way back.

  I think you should be more specific with your NAT ACL:

  access-list 120 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 120 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any