CC2015 - out of memory / leaking like sieves

Similar Questions

• SVG memory leak

  First the necessary info:

  Dev environment:
  -Eclipse 3.4.1 + Plugin JDE 1.0.0.67
  -Components packs: 4.2.1.17, 4.3.0.16, 4.5.0.16, 4.6.0.19, 4.7.0.46, 5.0.0.14
  -J' I alternate between 4.6 and 5.0 for the most... to reach 5.0, 4.6 for compatibility (and the 9000 is the only device that I have access to)

  Test environment:
  -Device 9000, 4.6.0.303
  -9000 Simulator, 4.6.0.266
  -Simulator 9550, 5.0.0.334
  - and other sims for different levels of the BONE, but the 3 above are my main tools

  My first discovery I had a big memory leak in my SVG code came when I discovered that each successive performance of my application took longer to go beyond my splash screen:

  361
  391
  40 s
  591
  96 s
  88 s
  269 s
  240 s

  Start the application, the startup screen, time and once the main screen opens the output.  Repeat and save the result as above.  4 minutes of the start screen is a little disturbing... of course when the projection indicates the icon rotation GC in the center of the screen, we see.  At first, it looks like FULL GC, then it starts to become longer and more which leads me to believe that we are entering the GC of emergency.

  First question: when an application calls System.exit (0), shouldn't all its memory be recovered?  What the purpose of the virtual machine?  I watched the videos LMM both GC, and I think the only point of disorder is to deal with PersistantObjects and yes I use those and I may have a leak in there, but he can't explain 10 MB of RAM to chew up and not recovered by the GC.

  So I narrowed down it to a single call in the SVG land... I think the Plazmic media engine behaves pretty badly...  Or I do not understand this methodology SVG as well as I should.

  Here is a sample of soft that will consume all memory on a device and end with an exit from exception memory.

  Second question: what's wrong with this code?  (I believe that this will trigger a GC of emergency late... before the OOM exception)

  package SVGMemoryLeak;
  
  import javax.microedition.m2g.SVGImage;
  import javax.microedition.m2g.ScalableGraphics;
  
  import org.w3c.dom.Document;
  import org.w3c.dom.Node;
  import org.w3c.dom.svg.SVGElement;
  import org.w3c.dom.svg.SVGSVGElement;
  
  import net.rim.device.api.system.Backlight;
  import net.rim.device.api.system.Display;
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.Graphics;
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.UiApplication;
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.container.MainScreen;
  
  public class MemoryLeak extends UiApplication {
  
      public static void main(String[] args) {
          MemoryLeak leak = new MemoryLeak();
  
          leak.enterEventDispatcher();
  
      }
  
      public MemoryLeak(){
          pushScreen(new svgScreen());
      }
  
      class svgScreen extends MainScreen implements Runnable{
          protected static final String SVG_NAMESPACE_URI = "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
          protected static final String XLINK_NAMESPACE_URI = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
  
          private SVGImage image;
          private Document doc;
          private SVGSVGElement svgTopElement;
          private SVGElement svgGroup;
          private ScalableGraphics scalablegraphics;
          private int h;
          private int w;
          private int counter=0;
  
          public svgScreen(){
              super();
  
              scalablegraphics = ScalableGraphics.createInstance();
              image = SVGImage.createEmptyImage(null);
              doc = image.getDocument();
  
              w = Display.getWidth();
              h = Display.getHeight();
              image.setViewportHeight((int) h);
              image.setViewportWidth((int) w);
  
              // Get our root svg element.
              svgTopElement = (SVGSVGElement)doc.getDocumentElement();
              svgTopElement.setFloatTrait("width", w);
              svgTopElement.setFloatTrait("height", h);        
  
              svgGroup = (SVGElement)doc.createElementNS(SVG_NAMESPACE_URI, "g");
              String color = "#4444ff";  //blue
              svgGroup.setTrait("color", color);
              svgGroup.setTrait("stroke", color);
              svgGroup.setFloatTrait("stroke-width", 2);
              svgGroup.setTrait("fill", color);
              svgGroup.setFloatTrait("fill-opacity", 0.25f);
  
              svgTopElement.appendChild(svgGroup);
  
              //start the animation...
              UiApplication.getUiApplication().invokeLater(this, 50, true);
          }
  
          protected SVGElement NewCircle(float x, float y, float r) {
              SVGElement e;
  
              e = (SVGElement)doc.createElementNS(SVG_NAMESPACE_URI, "circle");
              e.setFloatTrait("cx", x);
              e.setFloatTrait("cy", y);
              e.setFloatTrait("r", r);
  
              return e;
          }
  
          protected SVGElement NewText(String t, float x, float y){
              SVGElement e;
  
              e = (SVGElement)doc.createElementNS(SVG_NAMESPACE_URI, "text");
              e.setFloatTrait("x", x);
              e.setFloatTrait("y", y);
              e.setTrait("#text", t);
  
              return e;
          }
  
          private void update(){
              //remove old SVG Elements
              Node node = svgGroup.getFirstChild();
              while(node!=null){
                  //This is where I think it leaks...
                  svgGroup.removeChild(node);
                  //How do I reclaim the memory when I discard this node?
                  node = svgGroup.getFirstChild();
              }
  
              ++counter;
  
              //Put on some new elements...
              //Circle animation (it grows in radius 0->99 px)
              svgGroup.appendChild(NewCircle(w/2,h/2,counter%100));
  
              //Add some text
              svgGroup.appendChild(NewText("demo",100,100));
              svgGroup.appendChild(NewText("demo",100,h-100));
              svgGroup.appendChild(NewText("demo",w-100,100));
              svgGroup.appendChild(NewText("demo",w-100,h-100));
  
              //Rotate the scene about the center of the screen
              int rot = counter%360;
              svgGroup.setTrait("transform", "rotate("+rot+" "+(w/2)+" "+(h/2)+")");
          }
  
          public void paint(Graphics g){
              update();
              scalablegraphics.bindTarget(g);
              scalablegraphics.render(0,0, image);
              scalablegraphics.releaseTarget();
          }
  
          public void run() {
              //cause a repaint...
              invalidate();
  
              //Keep the back light on... it takes a while
              //(~5 minutes for it to run out of memory on the 9000 simulator)
              Backlight.enable(true,20);
  
          }
  
      }
  
  }
  

  FYI - I found a method to recover the memory of a deleted... node remove all references to the doc of the mother and the image.  Or rather, to create a new DOM and throw the old one.  Churn within a single doc will flee until it fails... If you need to remove something from your doc, SVG, it is best to recreate from scratch without the thing you want deleted.

  Is not ideal, much slower, but it does not leak.

• There seems to be a MAJOR problem (blocking/memory leak) in "subject: House", also known as the Firefox Start Page, at 26.0 Firefox on Windows!

  There seems to be a MAJOR problem (blocking/memory leak) in "subject: House", also known as start up Firefox, 26.0 Firefox Page, Windows!

  seen on:
  -Windows 7 x 64 machine with 12 GB of RAM and high performance CPU (core i7-920)
  -Comments Machine virtual WinXP SP3 (in Oracle VirtualBox) running on the same computer
  -Intel Atom D525 netbook with 4 GB of RAM, running Win7 x 64

  None of these machines are connected through Sync or something like that. The Firefox instance on the virtual machine is a fresh install / clean.

  The problem:
  -100% of cpu usage for 10 seconds, (util in XP) memory usage goes up to 1.7 GB
  -If "subject: House" is actually the Firefox Start Page, it blocks the computer at startup of Firefox for 10 seconds
  -If "subject: House" isn't the Firefox Start Page, startup is fine - BUT if I press the "home" on the toolbar button it loads "on: House" which causes the same question once again

  Sounds that there is a problem with one of the code snippets that are responsible. I've seen several reports on this issue.

  You can set the browser.aboutHomeSnippets.updateUrl pref an empty string on the subject: the page of config to disable loading (new) checked to see if that helps.
  
  You can open the topic: config page through the address bar

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/about:config

  You must remove the ' storage\moz-security-about + origin "folder in the folder of Firefox to delete already profile stored clips.

  You can use this button to go to the Firefox profile folder:

  • Help > troubleshooting information > profile directory: see file (Linux: open the directory;) Mac: View in the Finder)
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox

• my mac is running out of memory

  my mac is running out of memory. A couple of times that my mac has said it is close to running out of memory to disk. What should I do?

  OmniDiskSweeper (free download)

  http://www.OmniGroup.com/more>

  When you use OmniDiskSweeper, or any utility that displays all the files...  See the article after if you want to run it as root

  http://www.MacObserver.com/TMO/article/how_to_recover_missing_hard_drive_space>

  Warnings of boiler plate:

  DO NOT delete files in your folder-> library tree as it has things like backups of your iPhone, your emails, your application preferences, etc...  If you think that you found something in your Home-> library folder which can be removed, you must ask first.

  DO NOT remove the files outside your home folder, you can end up removing something essential to Mac OS X and transform your Mac into a costly "door Stop."

  I want to say that you will find a few very large files in private-> var-> vm (these are Mac OS X virtual memory paging files (swapfiles) and where Mac OS X stores the RAM copy when your Mac is paused).  The swapfiles are removed on reboot, and the sleep image will just be recreated when you put your Mac to sleep.

  If you think that you found something to remove outside your home folder, it would be better to ask first before deleting.  There are many examples of people deleting files outside their home folder, rename files, or change the property or file permissions and then their Mac stops running.  Don't be one of those people.  Ask first.

• Defective touchpad (Synaptics) and slow computer after extended use (memory leak)

  Two problems have been caused with my HP Split 2 x since I bought it 2 months ago:

  (1) the touchpad works sometimes for a few seconds, while the touchscreen still work OK.

  (2) the computer becomes slow after a while of use (which varies from a few minutes to a few hours usually). The Task Manager shows 98%-99% of memory, most of which use (3.6 GB / 4 GB) are not paged memory.

  I suspect the two issues are related to a faulty Synaptics driver, according to:

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/notebook-operating-systems-and-software/envy-X2-non-paged-pool-memory-l...

  and http://forum.notebookreview.com/razer/731374-memory-leak-synaptics-driver.html .

  I did the same test as the second link with the same result: Open "Task Manager" (Ctrl-Shift-Esc), on the 'Performance' tab, select 'memory '. Note the value for "Non paged memory. If I move the touchpad, it increases to about 1 MB every 5 seconds. If I stop moving, the value remains constant.

  I use the preinstalled Synaptics driver, version 17.0.10.9 (Sep 06, 2013) for 64-bit 8.1 window.

  Everyone has the same problem, or use it without these issues?

  I would like to know if a restoration system or factory reset may fix.

  FINALLY!

  Microsoft has just released an update for Synaptics Driver, not thanks to HP which has not found a way to provide the possible Synaptics driver as an OEM update.

  Update Windows Update to Sypatics HD TouchPad two days ago, but I would not be allowed to install as it kept then mainly in giving the 800F0100 error Code. After some research on the Internet I could find that an installation manual after the WU has downloaded the driver would be possible.

  So I went to the Device Manager > mice and other pointing devices > TouchPad Synaptics HID > properties > driver > Update Driver > Browse my computer for driver software and shown the finger/windows/C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution/Download and everything worked like a charm = D

  I have no more memory leak and now after SEVEN MONTHS I finally can use gestures that it was supposed to.

  But I still annoyed gel problems which in my case is a dysfunction between the screen and the dock.

  Just that you wanted the guys at Microsoft to know is the solution, not the HP that would have had if they have signed and put the driver since November last at our disposal. Blame it on you, HP.

  Leo

• Out of memory when the function call (CopyTabPage)...

  Hello

  I get error "-12 out of memory" when using CopyTabPage (Panel, TAB, 0, Panel, TAB,-1) on my request (the first duplication tab).

  There are several levels of tab panel system (like this example)

  \tab_1 \sub_tab_1
          \sub_tab_2
          ...
          \sub_tab_16
  
  \tab_2  \sub_tab_1
          \sub_tab_2
          ...
          \sub_tab_16
  
  \tab_3  \sub_tab_1
          \sub_tab_2
          ...
          \sub_tab_16
  
  \tab_4  \sub_tab_1
          \sub_tab_2
          ...
          \sub_tab_16
  

  Each sub-tab panels contains appx. 16 x 60 controls (digital, ring, String) and some of them also stripchart graphics.

  I have reached the limit of the CVI? Are there things to check? (I develop under CVI 2012 SP1).

  May - so that someone knows how to fix this?

  Thank you

  George

  
  

• tool tip memory leak

  Seems to be leaking memory associated with ToolTips.  Every time I put your mouse on a panel using tool tips I see case the dynamic memory usage constantly increases.  If I comment out the call to the functions of the tool tip (i.e. SetCtrlToolTipAttribute), memory leak disappears.

  There is no patch for 8.0.0, if it is tell you.

  But from the Toolbox of the programming interface is open-source, you can easily fix it yourself:

  The 8.0.0 3365 online version of C:\Program NIUninstaller Instruments\CVI80\toolslib\toolbox\toolbox.c, you need to add the function call following ListDispose:

  If (RectContainsPoint (bounds, point))
  {
  PointConvertCoordinates (Panel, child, & point, FALSE);
  ListDispose (sortedChildren);
  Return PointToPanel (child, point);
  }

  After you make the change, you will have to recompile the file (Options > create a file object) to regenerate the object file and restart CVI.

  Luis

• LabView VB6 Dll interface causes memory leak

  Hello

  We use a large written in vb6 in our laboratory measurement built house software. Recently, we have added a new detector that is read using a labview vi that is called using a dll directly from vb6. Here, we call the function for example of read_detector which starts the collection of data and in a next step writes the data to a string. When you have finished the called function returns a pointer to the string and its length. VB6, we read this pointer and process data.

  This is a memory leak. This could be the case because we presets not memory for labview to write in and so just writing lab data in memory without releasing again? In the current configuration, the function of the dll is just called again and again and each lab view creates a variable outputstring.

  If we allocate the memory. How can we achieve for vb6?

  Best,

  Julian

  Well first of all, a handful of string LabVIEW is a very specific type of data LabVIEW. Not only is only LabVIEW himself knows exactly how to allocate and deallocate, but you must also allocate and deallocate in exactly the same instance of LabVIEW. Given that your LabVIEW DLL is executed for this purpose inside the DLL to run LabVIEW, you must also recover the LabVIEW memory manager functions according to DSDisposeHandle() of the lvrt.dll and call it after you are finished with the strings returned by the DLL function. This is however made very complicated since there are circumstances where not lvrt.dll is actually used by your DLL but another LabVIEW runtime system. And if you happen to have two DLLs created with different versions of LabVIEW LabVIEW, each of them will load and use its enforcement LabVIEW system according to DLL load next. Believe me, you don't want to know how next dll works and how to make this opportunity to work in an application. This is the way for Microsoft to create a monster to manage the hell of the DLL and in this way, rather to create exponential version of hell.

  You create just two memory leaks for each call of DLL function at the moment. LabVIEW creates a new handle of string for each of the parameters string at each call, you dereference the pointer, and then copy the contents into a SysString. But you let the chain handles LabVIEW blow created around the stack and the next your function call, you initialize the new variables of the battery which is initialized to null and LabVIEW creates two new handles. Also you need to do is to define an "Integer DSDisposeHandle(LStrHandle As Long)" exported lvrt.dll function and call it once you have copied the data of the handle in your SysString for both of these handles.

  But basically calling a DLL LabVIEW from no LabVIEW code and using LabVIEW handles string or array as parameters is several times more trouble that it's worth. The easiest would be fair, allocate a large enough buffer beforehand and pass those to the Configuration of the service DLL LabVIEW function to not accept a handful of string LabVIEW but a pointer to a string C instead. Do you work around the problem on the memory allocated by someone else to worry about your own program of VB and duty he properly release. The disadvantage of this approach is, that you should make sure that the memory allocated buffer is large enough for the maximum possible length that your DLL function may never return.

  But another approach might be to leave out LabVIEW total here and call the DAQmx APIs directly from VB.

• LV memory leak - how to use windows API SetProcessWorkingSetSize (from Kernel32.dll)

  Hi comrade LV'ers

  Well - it's a little tricky, but I will try and explain the problem and then ask the solution, because it is maybe someone knows a better way to deal with this... can get a bit long, sorry - if a solution comes up it will allow all of us to do more effective memory LV code so please read on...

  Here's the deal:

  When building even a simple executable LV, looking at the windows task manager will give a fairly large amount of memory allocated for such a small program - and the only way to free that is physically clicking windows minimize button, and then suddenly the amount falls to only a few MB and to maximize the window again once memory increase consumption somewhat new , but for a simple construction of VI for an exe that movement can alter consumption of + 70 MB less than 15 MB... This is regardless of the code that you put in the VI, so no coding example in this post, as is works the LV - you can even test with the development environment - look at the task mgr and verify the consumption of memory of LabVIEW, open inappropriate, ALL AND windows incl. Explorer etc., and you will see a significant decrease in the use of memory even after optimizing yet... This has bugged me since the first day, but as the RAM is a near zero cost these days is not something that I stay awake at night thinking... However - I spent in the tools to "publish to the web", eager to be a part of monitoring remote for my application my clients to discover the increased ease of use of the software that I sell them...

  All right, the editing is really easy (I use the monitoring function, NOT the embeded, clients should not have installed Labview RunTimeEngine because they could be watching a platform RTE unsupported as a web browser for mobile phone)

  Everything works very well also for the purposes of construction. -J' noticed that once users start remotely monitor running application - use memory in the application being LV begins to rise - and it keeps this making - to such an extent that you can drain the full computer and run the cliff with a windows error... It is of course not very productive for me, being specialized in measurement applications that usually runs for a long period of time - I first thought that I had made a few poor emissions in the VI will display on the Web page - but it turns out that I can reproduce this behavior with a simple Boolean on an empty façade...

  Supported OR has been informed, and they admit there is a problem, but so far, solutions to them was a bit too exotic for my taste, and so I'm looking for help from colleagues LV programmers...

  See you-the method to solve the memory consumption, is exactly the same one mentioned above... minimize the application running with the "minimize" button and all the memory will be released, as soon as you maximize the application and users are viewing from a distance, the use of memory raises once again, and history repeats... As mentioned previously, reducing the window via normal calls from LV property nodes does not give the same result, no more than a request deallocation of a VI (when you profile a project, there is no VI not growing to in memory, it is the LV the treat yourself do)

  After many search on Google for many hours, I came across this:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/?kbid=293215

  I think cutting the process with SetProcessWorkingSetSize would solve this problem, and now I would really like to be able to do that in my program, so that users are not forced to reduce every X hour program depending on their size of system...

  However - I have absolutely NO experience in calling the APIs windows of LV, I need someone with this knowledge to give an example of how to call this... I looked at the examples on how to make calls to the windows API - there is an example in this forum with a few inside llb and I gained an understanding about how parameters are passed between calls, but none to those who understand the 'hProcess' handle which is apparently necessary for this specific work winAPI call - everyone in this forum with the knowledge on how to get the handle of a VI, if possible, and could provide an example VI for me to use - or better yet, someone with knowledge of the procedure to follow in LV it self?

  Your help is highly appreciated

  Best regards

  Jacob

  LV8.6.1 patch something

  Win XP

  Hello

  see http://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-9292

  It is a kind of task manager with the ability to carve out the memory of a process.

  He calls SetProcessWorkingSetSize.

  Maybe it's help you wil

  Cosmin

  www.controlsag.ro

• memory leak Winlogon.exe and high CPU usage

  I use Windows XP SP3. I'm leaking memory in winlogon.exe (about 5 M/hour). In addition, the CPU usage spikes to 50% of all 6 seconds. The file is properly signed so probably not a virus.

  This problem started after the application of last weeks patches.

  I seriously doubt that winlogon has a memory leak or people around the world would be screaming about it... and they are not.

  If this is what a thing look like, then you have another problem - probably a malware infection, or what you are currently using antivirus/antimalware protection is afflicted.

  Looking at previous answers, I would say that McAfee is afflicted, and it is already a well know that McAfee is a memory and CPU hog and you may want to consider replacing with something of less intrusive as Microsoft Security Essentials (do you use McAfee?).

  Since the Microsoft Answers forum does not have any kind of information system request when a new question is asked, we know absolutely nothing about your system.  Not knowing the basic information a problem prolongs the frustration and the agony of these issues.

  Thank you MS Answers, allowing the resolution of simple problems as frustrating and a lot of time as possible.

  Provide information on your system, the better you can:

  What is your system brand and model?

  What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

  What is your Internet browser and version?

  Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Symantec, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, MSE, Panda, Trend Micro, CA, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, Comodo, etc..

  What do you see (exactly) that you don't think you should see, and when you see it?

  If the system works, what do you think might have changed since the last time it did not work properly?

  No matter what you use for malware protection, follow these steps:

  Download, install, update and do a full scan with these free malware detection programs at:

  Malwarebytes (MMFA): http://malwarebytes.org/

  SUPERAntiSpyware: (SAS): http://www.superantispyware.com/

  They can be uninstalled later if you wish.

  The scans by operating clean, restart and fix any problems.

• Massive memory leak on the driver for the card WLAN (BCMWLTRY. (EXE)

  I upgraded my laptop Dell XPS M1530 Window 7 and met a memory leak that makes my OS unusable within a few hours despite the 4 GB of RAM. I "lose" almost 1 MB of RAM every two seconds. After doing some research on Google, I discovered that the source of this huge leak is the bcmwltry.exe that is associated with the Dell Wireless WLAN Card network controller.

  I use version 5.10.38.30 of this executable that came with this laptop for several months, running Windows 7 Home Premium 64 x.

  To illustrate the leak, open Windows Task Manager.
  Click the process tab
  Check the box "Show processes from all users" below.
  Under the view menu, click Select columns, and then select the options of memory and Page faults.
  Click OK to see the new columns, and then click Page defaults to sort processes by page faults.

  For all my programs, the number of page faults is close to zero and or static, except bcmwltry.exe which has some 10 000 + faults per SECOND! There is certainly a huge memory allocation problem which is the cause of out of control. Currently there are over 14 million vulnerabilities having only generated this .exe about 15 minutes ago. Wowsers.

  OEM02MON.exe associated with the on-line Dell! Webcam Control Board also seems to have a similar problem.

  Want an immediate resolution. Restarting does not help, and that these problems occur in the absence of all other running applications.

  Thanks in advance,
  Evan

  The Dell Wireless WLAN Tray Service is useless bloatware and must be disabled. More information:

  y42k.WordPress.com/.../todays-Tech-Tip-kill-Dells-wirelesss-WLAN-tray-service

• audiodg.exe uses extreme amounts of memory and is a memory leak

  In my version of Win7, I noticed that the audiodg.exe problem since the days of Vista as posted here http://blogs.msdn.com/larryosterman/archive/2007/01/31/what-is-audiodg-exe.aspx have not been resolved to the extent of the audiodg.exe is concerned. I am exceeding 980 mb after that a few hours of computer work on my system and the CPU (3 hearts) gets POUNDED by this process later. Once I have kill the audiodg.exe in my system task manager becomes very fast and catchy as it should be. However, I lose all sound.

  I have a card his Creative Labs X - Fi Xtreme with the latest drivers for Windows 7.

  Why has this file and its inability to free the memory that should not have been treated for Windows 7? allocation of 980 mb on a 4 GB system for this driver file is ridiculous! I don't like how many bells and whistles your soundcard uses, it is an astronomical amount of memory it consumes and refuses to release back to the system.

  ALT-tab between applications once this process is killed becomes as sensitive and night on my system.

  PLEASE FIX THIS FILE!

  I don't buy a preconfigured PC because they never are good imo. I have a Gigabyte mobo, 4 GB of memory Corsair (Dominator), graphics card Sapphire Radeon ATI 3870, Coolermaster HAF 932 case, 720 processor Phenom II AMD and Creative XFi Xtreme card sound w/Windows 7 drivers. All the drivers are always up-to-date for all. No overclocking (yet) done. Windows 7 Pro version version too.

  I'll take a look at this link, but IMO there is a serious issue with the code in the audiodg.exe since Vista process that has not yet been fixed. Some ppl of things on report items is:

  (1) system response extremely slow when alt-tabbing between applications because of the audiodg.exe process. (I've noticed this myself).
  (2) sound recording causes gaps in the audio file created in the same period of 11ms audiodg.exe takes to dump its worker threads. (I have not checked myself that I have no noise, but this gentleman here can attest to this fact here .)
  (3) use of the extremely exorbitant memory and memory leaks the audiodg.exe. (I've noticed myself and he checked with almost 1 GB of memory used on the file audiodg.exe)

  I think your link above can be a good solution for this problem of using memory thank you (unless of course your Creative card uses Dolby Digital Live) to find but other issues (1 and 2) should always be addressed to people who have noticed them on this forum and others. I wll contact creative labs and pin them down on resources from misuse or from the memory of this asap services!

  The related solution will not work if you are using Ventrilo (I have use a lot) so I'll also contact Creative as to what may be a problem with their services and how they interact with the file subsystem audiodg.exe.

• Care + memory leaks...

  It would seem that the timesheet class has a few holes in it, a memory leak:

  If you try something like:

  for (int i = 0; i)<>

  {

  Sheet * x = Sheet:: create();

  Delete (x);

  }

  so unless the details pane Malloc from the perspective of information system QNX, used pile number is complete a manufacturing, you will observe that the used pile rose substantially.

  1 single loop is necessary, but its Friday then 100 loops has been typed to find memory leaks by using sheets
  .

  OK, reported via the links provided - didn't know that is where you reported bugs.

  Not sure we can do the code example simply to demonstrate the issue that the code fragment given, so posted that. Suppose that if more information is needed you can email us back.

  John

• Lightroom CC 2015.5 - memory leak?

  I reinstalled my computer just after doing a few hardware upgrades (12 GB - > 16GB, 500GB SSD, new video card) and now if Lightroom works for about 30-40 minutes, Windows warns me that my system is out of memory.

  I restarted Lightroom and opens the window information system and watched the real and the virtual memory used by Lightroom values just start a slow climb while the program was not yet in use.

  I've seen similar posts on Lr and a memory leak, but not quite the same circumstances.

  I am including the full screen Sys Info then that a few cases a minute apart on two counters memory below.  Any suggestion would be appreciated.  The creative cloud app said that I have the current version.

  Version of Lightroom: CC 2015.5 [1067055]

  License: Creative Cloud

  Operating system: Windows 7

  Version: 6.1

  Application architecture: x 64

  System architecture: x 64

  Number of logical processors: 8

  Processor speed: 3.3 GHz

  Built-in memory: 16366,4 MB

  Real memory for Lightroom: 16366,4 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 1063,8 Mo (6.4%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 1060,0 MB

  Memory cache size: 572,7 MB

  Maximum thread count used by Camera Raw: 8

  Camera Raw SIMD optimization: SSE2, AVX

  System DPI setting: 96 DPI

  Composition of the Bureau enabled: Yes

  Exhibition: 1) 1920 x 1080, 2) 1920 x 1080, 3) 1920 x 1080, 4) 1920 x 1080

  Entry types: Multitouch: no, built-in touch: No, built-in pen: no, touch external: No, external pen: no keyboard: No.

  News of GPU: GeForce GTX 950/PCIe/SSE2

  Check the supported OpenGL: past

  Provider: NVIDIA Corporation

  Version: 3.3.0 NVIDIA 364.72

  Rendering engine: GeForce GTX 950/PCIe/SSE2

  LanguageVersion: 3,30 NVIDIA via the Cg compiler

  The application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Lightroom

  Library path: D:\Miscellaneous\Lightroom\Lightroom Catalog.lrcat

  Settings folder: C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Lightroom

  Plugins installed:

  (1) home canon Plugin

  (2) Facebook

  (3) Flickr

  (4) HDR Efex Pro 2

  (5) attachment Plugin Leica

  (6) home Plugin Nikon

  (7) SmugMug

  Config.LUA flags: None

  Map #1: Seller: 10de

  Feature: 1402

  Subsystem: 32081462

  Revision: a1

  Video memory: 1969

  AudioDeviceIOBlockSize: 1024

  AudioDeviceName: Pregnant (2-High Definition Audio Device)

  AudioDeviceNumberOfChannels: 2

  AudioDeviceSampleRate: 44100

  Build: LR5x102

  Direct2DEnabled: false

  GPUDevice: not available

  OGLEnabled: true

  ========

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 1063,8 Mo (6.4%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 1060,0 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 1615,9 MB (9.8%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 1731,9 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 1737,3 MB (10.6%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 1882,7 MB

  Real memory used by Lightroom: 1999,6 MB (12.2%)

  Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 2204,4 MB

  =======

  Thank you

  Mike

  I suggest rolling back to LR CC 2015.4 as described here:

  Roll of Lightroom version prior update

  Change step 3 on the link above to read:

  (3) download and install the 2015.5 / 6.5 release

  Try again with LR CC 2015.4

• Massive memory leak to the Organizer 14 during the processing of faces

  Hello

  I have observed the Organizer 14 huge memory leaks during the processing of faces. My scripts:

  1. the Organizer 13 database with 35 k photos and faces named ~ 45. After the upgrade to v14, organizer began treating faces anew (preservation face name assignments v13). Now, for each photo ~ 6-8 k he consumed ~ 6GB of memory which was not returned to the system, where message memory and OS closing the Organizer. I have confirmed, that it was process organizer who was consumed by memory. I just finished finally all batch processing, and leaks memory have been persistent between the the computer reboots/restarts and restarts organizer - always at the same pace.

  2. After finishing above, I'm done with 12 batteries face k (right - 12 thousand - I have many faces). I started treatment, deciding faces unconfirmed for named faces and piles of face. After an hour or two of work, I'm done with the memory low Message for the Organizer again. What happened only once so far, but I guess because it was my first batch of work after the re-scan.

  Have you noticed something like that? I have screenshots of the Task Manager for the first scenario, and I think that I can easily do some for the second.

  I would like to report somewhere as well?

  TIA & looks

  Suggestion:

  Ask your question in the forum comments:

  Community customer Photoshop family

  and include a link to this discussion.

  I can't help you, I do not use the automatic facial recognition. Only manual.