difference in size of VMDK

Similar Questions

• free vSphere Datastore space and the differences in size of VMDK

  I am listing and sizes VM reports and the amount of space they take on their related data storage. I used PowerCLI to capture this information and have issued the following command to retrieve the data store size and free space: Get-data store. Returns a name, quality and free space. Then, I want to see the size of the VMDK on these data stores using the: Get-Datastore. Get - VM | Get-hard drive. This returns the size VMDK in KB and after you convert in the UK, I sum up the totals and calculate space to subtract from the total size of the data warehouses. I have a lag in information in free space. For example:

  Name FreeSpaceMB CapacityMB

  vSphere 1 63634 511744 storage

  vSphere 2 60576 511744 storage

  The data that I get of you add up all the VMDK located on these two stores of data then subtracting total capacity does not equal free space above. I did this on our entire VM infrastructure and continue to run on this issue. The VMDK must reside somewhere, so why they bring two different digits? Is there a any correlation between the VMDK size and free space? Often my data are disabled by nearly a terabyte.

  In this case less than 50 GB, remember to file vswp, etc.

  But sometimes report is simply wrong in vSphere Client, you can get accurate information in the service console.

  ---

  MCSA, MCTS Hyper-V, VCP 3/4, VMware vExpert

  http://blog.vadmin.ru

• What is the difference between size function and aggragate function?

  Hi Experts,
  
  In OBIEE 11.1.1.6.0, what is the difference between size function and aggragate MDB measure column function?
  If it contains material or detail information, I am very grateful to you.

  Hello

  Good example with screenshots-

  http://www.clearpeaks.com/blog/Oracle-BI-EE/aggregation-based-on-dimensions

  Mark this reply / helped.

  Concerning
  Young

• Maximum size of VMDK

  Guy

  I know that size max VMDK is on ESXi 4.1 is 2 TB... my question is if I have a virtual machine that has 100 GB OS, but 4 additional VMDK attached to this virtual machine, and each is 2 TB VMDK?

  Or a virtual machine may contain not more than 1 to VMDK?

  Please specify it. Thank you.

  .. and don't forget that the max is based on a single HARD drive presented to the customer, not a total of all hard drives present.

• Difference in size between the 2 forms...

  Good day all.

  This may seem like a strange question, and somehow, I guess it is. But now.

  Difference in size form?

  I've drawn 2 forms that have all the same fields. The only difference between the 2 forms is 1 is English and the other is French.

  The French form is 1.4 MB and English are 2.1 MB.

  I had a quick glance and it doesn't seem to be something different between the 2 forms except as I said the language.

  The area using this form asked whether it would be possible to reduce the size of the shape as yours to send multiple copies (20 this time) and is limited to the total MB in an email.

  I use version 8.05.2073 of the life cycle of the designer

  Thank you all

  Chomp

  You can désincorporer fonts? If you do not need, also disable accessibility. Everything in file > form > Save Options.

• Where to 10 GB in size of VMDK files.

  Hello.

  SW: WmWare Workstation 7.1.4.

  HW: Intel Core i7-920/6 GB of RAM/2x0.5Tb HARD drive. Host of OS = Windows 7 x 64 ultimate.

  I have a virtual machine with the guest OS Windows Server 2003.

  When I run this VM I see inside - drive C: size = 39.8 GB space free = 30, 2 GB. So, space = 9.6 GB.

  But when I stop VM I see - the VMDK file size is 19 GB!

  The big question is - where did it take 10 GB 'extra '?

  How can I adjust to its actual size? So I want VMDK take all the space, it is used in real-time under guest operating system.

  Well, I'm ok if difference will be from 1 to 2 GB but 10 GB - it IS TOO! :-(

  I tried to shrink the VMDK size:

  (1) ran Compact & Deframent for this VMDK file (in VmWare FRO this virtual machine).

  2) has added a new virtual HARD disk, start VM in the Acronis image ISO disc and then - created disk image of the HDD1, HDD2.

  Then HDD1 deleted, added new HDD1 with the same size. Restore the system from the HDD2 to HDD1 disk image.

  After all these manipulations I still have VMDK size = 19 GB!

  Still can't understand - where does 10 GB 'extra '?

  Kind regards
  Dmitry.

  I'll assume that you don't have any snapshots...

  First of all, you need to use Shrink VMware Tools or instead using another method to zero free space on the disk for compacting.  In Virtual Machines Windows I use SDelete with the argument - c, then press stop, suspend not and the compact disc I think faster then using VMware Tools shrink.

• Difference in size camera & Camera leader Open Stock

  I came across a beautiful camera application that is also open source called Camera open. Beautiful free app. It also has the possibility to choose the video quality FULL HD (1080 p), HD (720 P) etc...

  When I got a wink of two camera of the application of the open camera app file size was smaller 2 MB compared to the camera app stock without any sign of deterioration in the quality of the photo. Both applications have been set at the same settings (16:9 with the same resolution).

  However when I take a full HD video the size of the file of the two applications is the same.

  If you take lots of photos, then overall storage consumed by photos taken using open camera would be much smaller.

  Anyone can throw some light on this...

  Thank you

  Probably the code used for jpg compression and settings bike taken against the other application. My guess is that, in good conditions, you will notice a difference between the applications. It might be by zooming in on the image of the processsed, or perhaps different lighting.

  More large recorded images are usually better in the long term. You can't go back and resume most of the images, and if you want to crop you have additional data.

• difference in size of disk

  and al.,.

  Host: Windows 8 Pro x 64

  Client: Windows 7 Ultimate x 86 {30 GB used space, maximum 200 GB HD.  8 GB of ram}

  Question:

  on the host, the vmdk reported a 101 GB in size.  Despite the fact that in the VM, the guest operating system reports only 30 GB of usage.

  I cleaned the hd guest operating system.  I have defraged inside the guest os.  I ran vssadmin get rid of any shadow copy.  Yet just 30 GB inside the guest os.

  I did the same thing on the host computer.

  Can't understand why the vmdk on the host is so great!

  Anyone got any ideas?

  Thank you!

  Snapshots have consumed more host disk space. Also running a defragmentation program within the guest to use a lot more host actually cause disk space.  Take a look on: Clean Up a virtual hard drive on the Windows host

• Size Max VMDK in ESXi 4.1

  VMDK in ESXi 4.1 maximum size cannot be larger than 2 to 512 Byets? Choose the block size of 128 MB?  Thank you.

  Max is 2 TB minus 512bytes

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vSphere4/R41/vsp_41_config_max.PDF

• Difference in size of file in LR and PS

  I have a few files that really confuse me.

  LR 5 shows them as 16 MB files. PS CC shows them as files 91 mb. Finder shows a 95 MB and the other as 234 MB.

  I'm pretty new to LR and was done LR edition and then using NIK plugins or perfect Photo Suite and sometimes PS, always their re-registration in LR and LR printing. I often end up with 3 or 4 files. Part of this is because after printing, I export the file in my "print" file which allows me to find easily what I think were good enough for printing at a later date. I'm sure that some of this is that I'm still not completely trust LR because I am always surprised by such things from time to time... I'll get there.

  But how can I know why these file formats are so disparate?

  Thank you

  Tom

  Tom O\'Connell wrote:

  -all sRGB, 16-bit, 300 DPI and layer flattened to isolate all the... BUT one of the files was saved somehow as a size much more important to a different PPP and who are responsible for the difference in the size of the files.

  If you try to preserve maximum quality in use PSD or TIFF, these preferences settings and the same settings when using the export module. ProPhoto RGB is the color profile native LR uses, with a much wider than the sRGB range.

  

  Tom O\'Connell wrote:

  When I use an external editor - actully not PS as much as the collection NIK or perfect Photo Suite, I save the file that takes back me to LR by displaying recent changes on the magnifying glass - fact that 'save' to return to LR create a new file to the original on my hard drive format? If I may make other changes in LR that creates another file?

  The function "change in" creates an image file with the same resolution as the original file. All editing in LR is the 'non-destructive' meaning the file is never modified. 'Apply' the changes you will need to use an output function such as edit, export or output of the other module functions. This will create another 'new' file with changes applied, but it is not normally necessary.

  Tom O\'Connell wrote:

  When I used only the PS and plugins, each plugin use would create a new layer, but not a new file as such. I can create several new files I really, but I have to say it has served me well for a monthly that was 'printed' output folder so I could easily find the files I had bothered to print (raw files have remained in their own folder based on object). When I print a file, physically I the name with a name of legend + the name of the original file.

  Edition of plugins are "destructive", which means that the only way to use it is to create a separate PSD or TIFF with the LR settings applied. It's OK, but I would not make copies of additional files beyond this first level. Use instead "virtual for your 'print output," as copies copies of the event. You can also use the suggestion of Jim Hess to create collections that are "virtual folders" to organize these "print virtual copies. It is also a good idea to use keywords and collections for the Organization of your images rather than creating folders with names based on the material. Others may disagree, but it will save you a lot of extra work and records disappearing suddenly from headaches (help - LR deleted my files!).

  When and if the time you want to give up LR there are ways to reorganize and update the files with relevant metadata for use in another editing application. The only thing that you will probably never be able to do is to import your raw files in another editor and do apply the development parameters of LR.

  I strongly suggest you do yourself a good Lightroom book and its cover-for reading the coverage. You can also find most of these information directly on the web in pieces and little of topic, but a good book will serve you well!

  troom 205% 20Books % http://www.Amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?URL=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Ligh

  It's hard to break old habits, but I did and I am 67. Non-Destructive editing is the Cats Pajamas!

• resize size incorrect vmdk after recovering plate

  Hello

  I got flat condition vmdk again doing stub (http://www.phdvirtual.com/wrapgen) file.

  but I am wrong, and now I have the disk with size 900 GB instead of 9 GB.

  How can I resize this disc?

  Thanks in advance

  Delete the one you generated and create another new of correct size.

• Difference in size of the PDF file generated between distiller 6.0 and 10.0

  Hello

  We are currently using Distiller server 6.0.1 on Windows server 2003 to convert PS to PDF, we want to improve our operating system to Windows server 2008 R2 but Distiller server is not supported on this point.

  so we evaluate Acrobat distiller 10 which comes with Acrobat x pro, but we have noticed a slight difference in the size of the generated PDF, for even the server PS distiller 6.0 generated PDF

  file size of 55KO so that Acrobat distiller generated 10 PDF file is 53 KB. The output looks like even, but I was wondering is it safe to continue further with the difference in file size, it would be good

  If you could provide any idea why the file sizes are different between these two versions.

  Thank you

  Anand

  Note:

  You may not use Adobe Acrobat on a server.

• Difference in size between wall Source and program?

  I'm new at first and started using it because I love how sturdy it is great. When I drag a clip in a Source (Group?) monitor, the video preview is a different size if I slide the same clip in the program monitor. When I try export the clip, it exports to the same size as the program preview screen which has a large black borders even if the original for this clip has no borders. I would like the project to export more closely to the size of the preview of the Source monitor. When I'm in the area of export settings, click the option use the same parameters as the source file, but it still has black borders.

  I assume this has something to do with reports l / h? But then I don't know why something would have black borders if I choose to use the settings from the original source. I'm not really difficult to get rations of exact great aspect at the moment, I'm just curious to know what the difference is between dragging a clip in the source monitor and program monitor. This is the same exact clip that I am dragging in both. Because now I understand how the slightly larger clip in the program monitor by allowing eligible and right margins by expanding the video preview, that she grows in the exporting region and does not cause any reduction in video quality. Only complaint is that I have to play with the eligible margins on all the separate clips that come with different files to make them fit into one video.

  All this makes sense? Is there a setting somewhere that will import a file to have the same dimensions, when I try and then export it?

  In short:

  Import a file. When I drag him in the Panel of the sequence, the previews show with black borders when the original video clip did not. How can I have that happen?

  Many thanks (assuming that I have provided information to evacuate to produce a clear answer)

  When you create a new project you are presented

  with a setting of the sequence to the choice menu.

  You can skip this step by pressing "Cancel", then import your media

  and create the type of sequence that best adapts to your images.

  Try this:

  

  And to better understand what is happening, look at this:

  How to choose the right sequence settings?

• difference in size of the Table in oracle and timesten

  Hi all
  
  
  I have a large table with 2 million records,
  
  I see no big difference in the size of the table in oracle and Timesten
  In oracle table size to 4 GB, but in Timesten is arround 15 GB (using ttSize for 2 M lines)
  
  Could you please tell me what could be the cause of this difference?
  Is the size of the table in Timesten is always more than oracle?
  What are the factors and parameters affecting the size of Perm?

  It is typical for the storage needs for a DataSet to be significantly larger in TimesTen in Oracle. This is due to the Organization of the very different internal storage in TT from Oracle; Oracle is optimized to save space while TT is optimized for performance.

  Ways to minimize these costs are:

  1. make sure you use TimesTen 11.2.1. This has some characteristics compare compact (minor) and earlier versions.

  2 assess the use of numeric types; native types TimesTen (TT_TINYINT, TT_SMALLINT, TT_INTEGER and TT_BIGINT) use less space than MANY and longer by the effective calculation as well.

  3. check use of data of variable length (VARCHAR2, VARBINARY, NVARCHAR) and the trade-offs between online and online storage (see documentation for the compromise between these options stirage TT).

  Even when you use the foregoing, you will still see a storage important "inflation" for TT from Oracle.

  Chris

• Difference in size between Simulator .bar vs device-release .bar

  So, finally, I created my first app and I have a lot of trouble hell ship. so, here are the steps to generate the file bar. (using qnx momentics 2.0)

  1) click Project, and then export to another directory

  (2) import these files into a new workspace.

  (3) right click on the project and change the device-release build configuration

  (4) construction project

  (5) use bar - descriptor.xml for the Release version of export

  (6) create a folder as packer BAR and it has the bar of the file with arm / o.le - v7 (not sure what that means?). the file size is about 470 K.

  But if I do the same step and instead use Simulator-debug, the file size is about 1.6 M.

  When I click on the bar of file for the two build configurations, he settled on the Simulator (didn't have not a device to test, so using the Simulator to test the bar device-release file). Interestingly, file bar Simulator works fine, but the bar device-release file locks up.

  is this expected behavior, or am I missing something here?

  Thank you

  It is expected that the bar version file is much smaller than the debug bar file.  The debug version contains a bunch of extra stuff for debugging.

  A generation of device (debug or release) will not work in the Simulator as the Simulator requires an x 86 version and the real peripheral ARM version of the binaries.

  I don't know why you should export your project and import again to do a release build.  What happens when you try on your original project?