EAMA / AMM & Advisory

Similar Questions

• Question of the AMM

  As a general rule, I've heard it is best to analyze usage of your DB and manually set the memory settings, however, I decided to give the AMM a test and the results are confusing.

  OS: OEL 6.5

  DB: EE 11.2.0.3.0

  CPU: 16

  RAM: 96 GB

  I put the following settings on a simulated production DB and restarted.

  memory_max_target = 47G

  memory_target = 45G

  SGA_MAX_SIZE = 0

  SGA_TARGET = 0

  pga_aggregate_target = 0

  To my surprise, the sga_max_size changed to 5G with the PGA dominating the memory allocated to about 40G. I would have assumed that the buffer cache and shared pool would have been a much bigger part of memory instead of the skinny 1184 M (shared pool) and 3776 M (buffer cache) which was attributed. I ran a few significantly heavy read/write IO operations that consumed the SGA to simulate a heavy load for a full day, then stop and restarted, under the assumption that the AMM would 'learn' and increase the sga_max_size during restart. He did not. Clearly, I am missing in some basic concept of operation AMM determines the effectiveness and memory allocation (and Yes, I read the online documentation of SGA/PGA/AMM/EAMA).

  If anyone can provide insight as to why AMM puts BMG so small I would be very happy!

  Thank you

  > I ran a few considerably heavy read/write IO operations

  It is quite possible that most of your operations are either / some / all of

  a. direct Path reads (series or parallel) a "broad" table

  b. sort / group by operations

  The two would not need or use the cache buffers.  That they would use PGA.

  Hemant K Collette

• Oracle 11g AMM (automatic memory management)

  Hi all

  I have a very powerful server 24 processors 6 hearts of each and 74 GB of RAM for my production database. The server will host what a single database of production. I wanted to use the AMM for this database and maximum memory allocation to Oracle by defining memory_target. By default, / dev/SHM has 37 GB but I wanted to increase it less 55GO. I know I can get it changed by my system administrator, but I wanted to know how much memory should leave BONES?

  Please help me on this design.

  Thank you

  Arun Singh

  The POSIX or/dev/SHM shared memory is 50% of physical RAM by default. If you want to change the default, you need to specify your OS version, because it depends on.

  However, thanks to WMA or/dev/shm in a system with more than 16 GB of RAM you are going to lose a lot of performance and memory, which, according to Oracle Linux engineering is the reason number 1 for poor Oracle database performance. Memory POSIX shared in your configuration will result in the loss of performance due to TLB misses and waste memory only to manage the memory of 4 KB pages.

  I recommended that configure the system using the kernel hugepages, which use memory 2 MB pages, remove memory_target and memory_max_target of your instance settings file and configure the database to use EAMA.

• What is the consensus about the AMM

  Hello, I use a database of test on AIX and just upgraded from 10.2 to 11.2
  
  When I created my database using DBCA I updated BMG 512 MB. When I upgraded to 11g it says the minimum being 624 MB which I increased to.
  
  I just got a message in the alerts log: ORA-12751: time cpu or run time of violation of policy but can't see any problems.
  
  Anyway after looking at several different sites, I decided to switch to using EAMA of AMM. What is the general consensus on the AMM? How manage you the LMS - JANET, AMM or manually? Do I have reason to think that I don't have to worry about all the settings in the BMG now?
  
  Thank you very much for all your comments

  991215 wrote:
  Please see this.

  http://www.DBAs-Oracle.com/2011/04/relation-between-memorytarget-sgatarget.html

  It looks like a direct copy of some document MOS!

  Aman...

• What is the recommended action in response to the Safety Advisory 04/06/10 to Adobe for Flash Player?

  Adobe Security Advisory: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa10-01.html

  "Is a critical vulnerability in Adobe Flash Player 10.0.45.2 and earlier versions for Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Solaris operating systems... »

  The addon Flashblock 1.5.13 is able to prevent this vulnerability? I am hesitant to install it because of recent poor user reviews.

  Any suggestions or advice are appreciated. Thank you.

  Hi, Bill.
  Flashblock will block the market Flash objects unless you explicitly allow them. I used to use Flashblock, but I do not have for some time. So, Yes, it will do the job. I only see a bad double-posted review for Flashblock. The average rating is always 5 stars.

  Instead, I use NoScript, which blocks all scripts on the page Flash and other plugins unless expressly authorized by you. It may be a stretch to deal with this vulnerability.

  You can disable the Flash plugin until you are sure that you are on a secure site, it needs, such as YouTube, in tools-> Modules-> Plugins.

  You can also try the pre-release version of Flash 10.1, which, according to Adobe, seems not to be vulnerable. Make sure you follow the instructions to uninstall any old version of Flash before installing 10.1. I used it without a problem for a while.

  You can be very well as long as you avoid unknown sites. Once there is a malicious site, Firefox blocks with built in site and phishing site protection against attacks.

• Microsoft Security Advisory (2794220) - zero-day IE 6 to 8 vulnerability

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/security/advisory/2794220

  http://www.KB.cert.org/vuls/ID/154201

  http://Secunia.com/advisories/51695

  Intrernet Explorer 6 to 8 are affected, the 9 and 10 are not affected (at least for now).

  Microsoft has released the out-of-band security update to fix the problem http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms13-008

  Note: If you have already applied the temporary "Fix It" solution you must uninstall it before running Windows Update to get the security update.

• Not able to install the update to Security Advisory 2718704 security.

  Original title: Security Advisory 2718704.

  Hello

  I am running Windows XP Tablet SP2 because SP3 trashes my graphics card.
  Should I worry about FLAME? What do you recommend?
  When I tried to apply the patch, I got a message that I need SP3!

  Thank you

  Info: Support for WinXP SP2 ended nearly two years ago.

  Fact: The computer lacks literally scores of critical security updates.

  Fact: The computer in question must NOT be connected to the internet or local area network (i.e. other computers) in its current state. All your personal data (e.g., banking online & passwords credit card) must be considered at risk, if not already compromised.

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  OPTION A: Take the computer to a local computer equipment recycler & kiss goodbye.

  OPTION B: Format the hard drive and then do a clean install (another?) of Windows. [Remove Acronis images previously created in advance].

  Follow the instructions in this post of mine in another forum (to-the-letter & in order! ): http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=44636

  If you need additional assistance with the clean install, please start a new thread in this forum: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-system

  Tip: If you still have problems with the pen after cleaning install, chances are that you just need a driver updated for the capture software. You should be able to find the update of the pilot on the bridge or the device, the manufacturer download pages.

  Wish I had better news for you.  Good luck!

  I have nothing to contribute to this discussion.

  ================================================================
  WARNING: Displayed AS IS without any warranty. MS MVPS represent or work for Microsoft

• I'm taking the Advisory content on / or turn off my computer. Whenever I'm in something of a content Advisory opens and asks me a password to continue.

  I would like for the Advisory to take content / or turn off my computer. They continue to request a password.

  Access Manager control procedures are in the following article:

  " Appendix J: Content Advisor in Windows Server 2008 .

  Go to half way down to the

  Section "Control Procedures Content Advisor"

  HTH,
  JW

• Protect me against the "HP Protection Advisory"!

  I have a new HP desktop and I'm already regretting the purchase.  Part 'A': the "HP Protection Advisory" popup screen that does not stop to appear. " Users receive TWO OPTIONS:

  (1) registry for the Norton online backup service

  (2) "remind me later".

  What is missing from this screen?

  WHAT FACULTY DO NOT REGISTER FOR THE SERVICE?

  I've sent e-mails to the customer 'care' for HP and Norton... NO ANSWER

  Next stop: facebook to warn everyone I now do not buy an HP.

  Paul Volle

  Email me so I can warn you to STAY away from HP.

  p.s. I correctly uninstalled Norton Online Backup from the Control Panel / programs / uninstall a program

• JSR-234 (AMMS): support for resolution actually unsupported

  I've been playing a bit with AMMS and CameraControl. There are two methods to retrieve and set the resolution of the camera:

  CameraControl.getSupportedStillResolutions();
  CameraControl.setStillResolutions(int index);
  

  Well, these are the results on a 6.0 9780 Simulator:

  >>> LIST OF SUPPORTED EXPOSURE MODES
       auto
  >>> LIST OF SUPPORTED RESOLUTIONS
       2048 x 1536
       1024 x 768
       480 x 360
  

  Tried to adjust the least high (480 x 360), and throws an IllegalArgumentException. JavaDoc says she is thrown when the resolution is not supported. So, why she returned as taken in charge?

  NOTE: I remember that something similar happened to me with this pair of methods:

  System.getProperty("video.snapshot.encodings");
  VideoControl.getSnapshot(String encoding);
  

  In this sense, the AMMS is as good as the old ordinary MMAPI.

  Sorry, that was my fault.

  The setStillResolution int parameter is not an index associated with the Bay of resolutions supported, but the number of the pair of resolution. Read the javadoc for more information.

  I thougth these methods were not reliable, based on past experiences with this old method:

  System.getProperty("video.snapshot.encodings")
  

  which generally produces invalid resolutions.

  I'm this close as solved.

• Security Advisory 2719662 any compensation for loss of job

  Hi, is there a reason why Microsoft feels they can stop supported monetary users of a service produced by removing the gadget feature without offering compensation or a replacement for loss of use product? It's basically false advertising since it was one of the main reasons why I bought this version of Windows.

  I paid for Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade, because I need to use the gadget functionality. The sidebar is still working and I still have some official gadgets provided with Windows 7, but they admit that I use now them at my own risk if I do not use the removal procedure.

  Why should I use the gadgets at my risk, when they must do the right thing and just fix security flaws and allow users to use the product safely?

  As a compromise, I offered to pay the current price of promotion for new PC buyers get Windows 8, because they will have the support of gadget. They told me that they can not extend the offer to me or give me any kind of compensation at all.

  Without gadgets, Vista and Windows 7 are basically not a major change in XP now.

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-CA/Security/Advisory/2719662

  Hello

  You can give your comments to this question below.
  
  Give us your comments for Windows 7
   
  Kind regards.

• TMS Meeting Manager AMM assets?

  I installed TMS 15.1 and TMSPE 1.6 on Server Win 2012.

  All the pre-requisited are met, but the AMM Active Meeting Manager is not displayed in the Smart Scheduler interface.

  I don't see the group settings to allow access to the AMM.

  Something that I forgot to activate?

  Ah, you don't have a CMR put in service to your TMSPE account.  Take a look at the "Meeting in Collaboration rooms deployment" section of the 1.6 TMSPE Deployment Guide from the pg 49.  When you have a CMR put in service to a group of users under systems > Provisioning > users, you should see something like the attached screenshot.

• In what kind of environment we prefer use AMM (Memory_target) on manual management of the memory?

  Hi all

  I am not able to classify what type of environment we prefer to use the AMM (memory_target) parameter to manual memory management. I've seen even on oracle 11g several customers use no memory_target parameter.

  Please rank the situation in order to differentiate these.

  Thank you

  -RAJ

  AMM does not work with HugePages.

  Large and complex environments on Linux would be to use HugePages.  In addition, the DBA would prefer better controls the size of the SGA and PGA in such environments.

  AMM can be used for small, medium environments with predictable usage patterns, less complex.

  Hemant K Collette

• EAM work order numbering based on the type of work order

  EAM work order numbering based on the type of work order

  Hello

  value is automatically entered into the text of the order of entry jobs Message.

  U explain how to derive the sequence and stand attribute VO

  Kind regards

  Kalai

• test DB has no AMM, the request takes 5 seconds, the prod DB has AMM query takes 5 minutes

  I created a copy of test of production for a long time, when I was creating the test I have not activated AMM.

  A developer created a new report and told me that it took seconds to run on the Pb test, as he was taking up to 10 minutes on the Pb of the production. I got it to extract the SQL code for the report and he ran from a command line, and on the Pb test, it took 5 seconds and more than 5 minutes on the Pb of the production.

  I then checked the AMM with the show memory_target parameter to see if AMM was activated and on the Pb of the prod is 1 GB on the DB test is 0

  memory allocation requests show this for prod:

  NAME                                     VALUE

  ------------------------------        ----------

  PGA maximum allowed 578929664

  pga_aggregate_target 0

  SGA_TARGET 0

  MEMORY_TARGET

  -------------

  578929664

  for the BP to test:

  NAME                                       VALUE

  ------------------------------          ----------

  PGA maximum allowed 214604800

  pga_aggregate_target 101711872

  SGA_TARGET 624951296

  MEMORY_TARGET

  -------------

  839556096

  I have not dbcontrol currently enabled on the Pb test, so I could not watch the advisors of the memory, but it is enabled on the Pb of the prod, that tells me it should be to the 1 GB is currently at.

  Two of these db are on the same server.

  Now I wonder if I should disable the AMM on the prod server and allocate manually to match the test, or should I change the AMM if possible so that it can perform as good as the Pb of test?

  Thanks in advance.

  I tried the suggestion of Geert earlier but I forgot to mention that it made no difference.

  However, I managed to find out what it is, starting at the beginning by looking at all the init parameters. It was then that I noticed the Prod OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE was set to 9.2.0.8, while the test was 11.2.0.3, a quick alter system set optimizer_features_enable = '11.2.0.3' scope = both and the query ran<5 seconds,="" just="" like="" the="" test.="" it="" also="" got="" rid="" of="" the="" note="" that="" the="" cpu="" costing="" was="" not="">

  I thought a bit more wording accurate in the order note explain plan could be useful - but in any case, it makes sense, I guess...

  However, this has been a useful exercise for me, I have a better idea how they use the remote database for retrieving information and will make suggestions, it may be easier to create views of the side remote (SQL Server), rather than on the side of the Oracle.

  Still do not know how the test done with the right parameter and the prod has not, I used to create the init.ora file to create the test instance by getting a carbon copy of the production spfile, but I missed this setting this time.

  In any case, it's a good thing I had the right parameter under test - otherwise the Developer & users may have accepted, he was going to be a slow and left...

  Thanks again for all your help

  PS. Now here is the plan explain of production:

  SQL> SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR(NULL,NULL,'ALLSTATS LAST'));
  SQL_ID  bqh1aq71rshpp, child number 1
  -------------------------------------
  SELECT /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */
  DOMCUST.CUSTOMER,DOMHEADER.WOODTYPE,DOMHEADER.ISSUEDATE ISSUEDATE,
  vw_testlots.TLOT_PREV PREV_LOT, VW_TESTLOTS.TLOT_NEXT NEXT_LOT,
  DOMLOTS.lotno ship_lot,       VW_PTMS_LOTS.AIRDRY
  AIRDRY,VW_PTMS_LOTS.BRIGHTNESS BRIGHT,VW_PTMS_LOTS.DIRT
  DIRT,VW_PTMS_LOTS.VISCOSITY VISCOSITY,
  (A.CCSF_0+B.CCSF_0)/2 CCSF_0,
  (A.TEAR1_0+B.TEAR1_0)/2 TEAR1_0,
  (A.BL_0+B.BL_0)/2 BL_0,
  (A.BURST_0+B.BURST_0)/2 BURST_0,
  (A.BULK_0+B.BULK_0)/2 BULK_0,
  (A.POROSITY_0+B.POROSITY_0)/2 POROSITY_0,
    (A.BOND_0+B.BOND_0)/2 BOND_0,
  (A.OPACITY_0+B.OPACITY_0)/2 OPACITY_0,
  (A.CCSF_1+B.CCSF_1)/2 CCSF_400,
  (A.TEAR1_1+B.TEAR1_1)/2 TEAR1_400,                                 (
  
  Plan hash value: 2207188603
  
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation                              | Name         | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  | Writes |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem | Used-Tmp|
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |              |      1 |        |    255 |00:00:05.90 |    1091K|     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE                        |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.91 |     385K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  2 |   FILTER                               |              |    255 |        |  57880 |00:00:01.11 |     385K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID         | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |  57880 |00:00:00.99 |     385K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN                   | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |     45 |    767K|00:00:00.85 |    5015 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |   5 |  SORT AGGREGATE                        |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.52 |     158K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  6 |   FILTER                               |              |    255 |        |  55792 |00:00:00.47 |     158K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  7 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID         | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |  55792 |00:00:00.36 |     158K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |*  8 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN                   | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |     45 |    516K|00:00:00.55 |    1372 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |   9 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:05.90 |    1091K|     45 |     45 | 70656 | 70656 |63488  (0)|         |
  |  10 |   NESTED LOOPS                         |              |      1 |        |    255 |00:00:04.47 |     547K|     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  11 |    NESTED LOOPS                        |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:04.47 |     546K|     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  12 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:03.88 |     383K|     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  13 |      NESTED LOOPS                      |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:03.02 |     979 |     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  14 |       NESTED LOOPS                     |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:03.01 |     712 |     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 15 |        HASH JOIN                       |              |      1 |      1 |    255 |00:00:03.01 |     527 |     45 |     45 |   858K|   858K| 1283K (0)|         |
  |  16 |         NESTED LOOPS                   |              |      1 |     19 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |      28 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  17 |          NESTED LOOPS                  |              |      1 |      1 |      9 |00:00:00.01 |      17 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  18 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | DOMCUST      |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       2 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 19 |            INDEX UNIQUE SCAN           | PK_DOMCUST   |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       1 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 20 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL            | DOMHEADER    |      1 |      1 |      9 |00:00:00.01 |      15 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 21 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN              | PK_DOMLOTS   |      9 |     21 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |      11 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  22 |         VIEW                           | VW_PTMS_LOTS |      1 |    101 |  15101 |00:00:03.05 |     499 |     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  23 |          SORT UNIQUE                   |              |      1 |    101 |  15101 |00:00:03.02 |     499 |     45 |     45 |  1328K|   587K| 1180K (0)|         |
  |  24 |           UNION-ALL                    |              |      1 |        |  15101 |00:00:03.06 |     499 |     45 |     45 |       |       |          |         |
  |  25 |            HASH GROUP BY               |              |      1 |    100 |  15101 |00:00:02.98 |       0 |     45 |     45 |  3004K|   982K| 3262K (1)|    1024 |
  |* 26 |             FILTER                     |              |      1 |    100 |  15842 |00:00:02.99 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  27 |              REMOTE                    |              |      1 |        |  16563 |00:00:02.95 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 28 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL           | PTMSLOTS     |      1 |      1 |      0 |00:00:00.01 |     499 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 29 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN               | PK_DOMLOTS   |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |     185 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  30 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID      | DOMHEADER    |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |     267 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 31 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN               | PK_DOMHEADER |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |      12 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  32 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID       | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.91 |     383K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 33 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                | PK_LOTTEST   |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.91 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  34 |        SORT AGGREGATE                  |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.91 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  35 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |    261 |00:00:00.90 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 36 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN              | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |      1 |    261 |00:00:00.90 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  37 |           SORT AGGREGATE               |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.90 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 38 |            FILTER                      |              |    255 |        |  57880 |00:00:01.09 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 39 |             TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |  57880 |00:00:00.97 |     382K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 40 |              INDEX RANGE SCAN          | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |     45 |    767K|00:00:00.85 |    1798 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 41 |     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | PK_LOTTEST   |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.53 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  42 |      SORT AGGREGATE                    |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.53 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  43 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID      | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |    264 |00:00:00.52 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 44 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |      1 |    264 |00:00:00.52 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  45 |         SORT AGGREGATE                 |              |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.52 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 46 |          FILTER                        |              |    255 |        |  55792 |00:00:00.46 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 47 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |  55792 |00:00:00.35 |     162K|      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |* 48 |            INDEX RANGE SCAN            | UK_LOTNO     |    255 |     45 |    516K|00:00:00.57 |    5282 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  |  49 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID         | LOTTEST      |    255 |      1 |    255 |00:00:00.01 |     255 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          |         |
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
  
     2 - filter(:B1-365<=:B2+365)
     3 - filter(("WOODTYPE"=:B1 AND "PRODDATE">=:B2-365 AND "PRODDATE"<=:B3+365))
     4 - access("LOTNO"<:B1)
     6 - filter(:B1-365<=:B2+365)
     7 - filter(("WOODTYPE"=:B1 AND "PRODDATE">=:B2-365 AND "PRODDATE"<=:B3+365))
     8 - access("LOTNO">=:B1)
    15 - access("DOMLOTS"."LOTNO"="VW_PTMS_LOTS"."LOTID")
    19 - access("DOMCUST"."DOMCUSTID"=1)
    20 - filter(("DOMHEADER"."DOMCUSTID"=1 AND "DOMHEADER"."ISSUEDATE">=TO_DATE(' 2014-05-30 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "DOMHEADER"."WOODTYPE"='H'
                AND TRUNC(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("DOMHEADER"."ISSUEDATE"))<=TO_DATE(' 2015-05-30 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
    21 - access("DOMHEADER"."DOMID"="DOMLOTS"."DOMID")
    26 - filter("A"."StartTime">GREATEST(SYSDATE@!-730,TO_DATE(' 2013-04-16 13:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))
    28 - filter("PRODTIME">SYSDATE@!-730)
    29 - access("DOMHEADER"."DOMID"="DOMLOTS"."DOMID" AND "DOMLOTS"."LOTNO"="DOMLOTS"."LOTNO")
    31 - access("DOMLOTS"."DOMID"="DOMHEADER"."DOMID")
    33 - access("A"."LOTID"=)
    36 - access("LOTTEST"."LOTNO"=)
    38 - filter(:B1-365<=:B2+365)
    39 - filter(("WOODTYPE"=:B1 AND "PRODDATE">=:B2-365 AND "PRODDATE"<=:B3+365))
    40 - access("LOTNO"<:B1)
    41 - access("B"."LOTID"=)
    44 - access("LOTTEST"."LOTNO"=)
    46 - filter(:B1-365<=:B2+365)
    47 - filter(("WOODTYPE"=:B1 AND "PRODDATE">=:B2-365 AND "PRODDATE"<=:B3+365))
    48 - access("LOTNO">=:B1)
  
  105 rows selected.
  
  Elapsed: 00:00:00.12