ESX 3i for Exchange 2003

Similar Questions

• Unity 4.0 (2) and /ForestPrep for Exchange 2003

  We plan to upgrade our Active Directory in Windows Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003 and Windows Server 2003 AD network. We currently have two unit 4.0 (2) servers (Unified Messaging) in two separate locations, each serving a different group of offices. All in all, we have more than 1,000 users in 5 different locations. All these users and locations upgrade to Windows 2003, Exchange 2003 and unity 4.0 (4) at the same time is not an option. Therefore, we would gradually migrate each location to Exchange 2003, Windows 2003 and unity 4.0 (4).

  I understand that unity 4.0 (4) is the recommended version to use with Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003, but I've also read in Cisco documentation as 4.0 (4) unit when running on Windows 2003 requires that you are already running Exchange 2003. What confronts a dilemma in that we have separate locations of mutiple supported by one server shared unity and we simply cannot risk all these sites simultaneously to unity 4.0 upgrade (4), Server 2003, and Exchange 2003. So, what would be the best strategy to go where we want to be? This brings me to the following questions:

  a. If we run / Exchange 2003 ForestPrep against our field now even if we are always unity 4.0 (2)?

  b. can we begin to introduce Exchange 2003 servers in each of our branches (administrative groups & routing Exchange) while staying at unity 4.0 (2) provided that these servers are not designated as a partner of unity and without voice mail server or connectors of the unit (for example, unity voice bridge connector) are on these servers?

  c. would make sense to upgrade the servers of the 4.0 unit (3) first and then move to unity 4.0 (4) once all the Exchange servers in all our branches have been improved in Server 2003 and Exchange 2003? This interim update seems to give us more flexibility in our path to upgrade its operating system to Microsoft Exchange server version requirements are less onerous

  Windows 2003 is not necessary for the 4.0 unit (4). Likewise, it is not recommended because there is evidence of the way in which Windows 2000 with the unit, but we do support Windows 2003 if the client really wants to use it. We ship the unit on Windows 2000 and that's what we recommend at this time. No functionality is lost under Windows 2000.

  Officially we do not support have all Exchange 2003 servers or even execution of ForestPrep if you have lower than 4.0 (3). That said, the only flaw we've never seen this is when the unit is connected under the local system or when the subscriber accounts are on Exchange 2003 servers. You wouldn't be the first customer to do so and it should be fine but really understand that it is not technically a Cisco tested and taken in charge of the configuration.

  Thank you

  Keith

• Best practices for Exchange 2003 with VMWare ESXi 3.5 and iSCSI SAN

  Hello guys,.

  Here's the Q? We have 1 physical Exchange 2003, the HOST of 4 and 1 iSCSI SAN with LUN 3, 1 for data, 1 for VMWare and 1 for SQL, if we're going to virtualize it, I don't know where to put data Exchage and newspapers. I do not think that that is a good practice to put together the data but I do not have another SAN. So, what can I do?

  Thank you.

  We have 813 mailbox.

  I agree with cainics, start an average size and go from there.  I know it's a production mail server and you can not exactly 'play' with the settings because this requires time, but if you do the VM too big, you would have nothing left for other virtual machines.

  I would go 2 vCPU and at least 4 GB of RAM, maybe 8GB.  There must be parameters for the Exchange mailbox 813 and X users # to implement your environments in order to get an idea of the amount of RAM that will be... 4GB seems minimal to me, but 8 GB would probably be better like that.

• Exchange 2003 P2V - duplicate name exists on the network

  Exchange 2003 P2V

  Hello

  I just finished the p2v for exchange 2003, now, I get an error that a duplicate name exists on the network - what do I do?

  Thank you

  You must stop the physical Exchange Server.

• Exchange 2003 Auto supply: IOM

  I'm trying to configure a user for exchange 2003. I use Windows 2003. I can create an exchange successfully through IOM account if I have available manually.
  
  I created 2 strategies to access, one for the AD and the other for Exchange (priority 1 and 2). They are all two supposed to automatically provision a user in AD/Exchange as soon as the account is created in the IOM. Account AD gets provisioned successfully.
  
  However, the Exchange 2003 account is given rejected status on check user AD process. Then I tried to set the value based on Exchange resource object to the user AD via the console. Now, it gives me a wait status and never actually creates the mailbox.
  
  Help!

  Something to this effect has been set in one of the beams of the patch later to IOM 9.1

• Migration of interns of exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud Exchange

  Hello

  I need help migrate my internal data from Exchange 2003 to Microsoft Cloud. It's my first time

  the display, if more information is needed please let me know. I bought Office 365 with Exchange for my client.

  Server - SBS2003

  Customers - Office 2007 and 2010

  Thank you

  Ty

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

  And here:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• Exchange 2003 Migration to Office365 with SSO

  Hi all

  Merry Christmas to start!

  I work for a company that run Exchange 2003. We plan to do a migration to Office365 and I am researching on the best solution.

  I am aware that there are three main options available, hybrid/intermediary/putting in service.

  My instincts suggest that the best option would be to complete the migration using the staging process, but I think that if I take this route I can't implement single sign on? This is the case...

  If so, is this means to ensure single sign-on can be used, then I can only implement a hybrid solution?

  Hello

  And a Merry Christmas to you, too.

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Please repost your Question in Exchange for TechNet Forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Exchange/en-us/home?Forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy

  See you soon.

• How can I restore and old information store (Exchange 2003) to my Exchange Server existing (Exchange 2010)

  Nice day

  3 months ago I installed Exchange Server 2010, now I need to recover a mailbox from a backup. The backup was performed while he was still Exchange 2003. I want to know is you can restore an old Exchange 2003 database in the Exchange 2010 recovery store, and if so what is the way forward. PS I use symantec backup exec 2010 R3 as backup software.

  If it is not possible, is there any other way to retrieve mailbox information

  Any help will be much appreciated.

  Hello Wh@pd@p,

  I suggest posting your question on our forums TechNet for Microsoft Exchange Server, located here again:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

• Exchange 2003 with clusters

  Hello

  I'm new with Exchange 2003 cluster environment in our Organization, we have a network that will make all activity the network down, then after 12 to 14 hours. Network will rise

  Our Exchange is configured in the cluster with call tool Symantec Enterprise vault archiving environment, we also have the ANTI-SPAM called Sonic Wall filter

  I just wanted to know what kind of care I have to take before and after the network outage?

  Your suggestion of all will be of great help for me

  Kind regards

  Patricia

  Hello SwapnilJain27,

  It would be better to post in the forum of Exchange Server.

  You can find the category that fits your question below:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/ExchangeServer

  Thank you!

• Exchange 2003 Server kept receiving unknown Email sending out through SMTP and the paper jam in the queue folder

  Hello Sir,

  I have a problem with one of my SBS Exchange 2003 servers.

  At first, I was getting a lot of 3008 errors for a non-delivery report with a status code of 5.0.0 was generated for recipient rfc822; address email is removed from the privacy * all these repeated error messages from the event log, SMTP and Exchange Routing service...

  I looked around and discovered more than 10000 .eml in my x:\program files\exchsrv\mailroot\queue folder.  At first, I thought that my server or one of my workstations was compromised, but all workstations have local antiviral software (symantec endpoint protection), my server software also has antiviral and I have a mail server antivirus (symantec endpoint protection).  I scanned all of the computers on the network and even tried almost all of them closing to see if new entries have been created in the queue.

  Unfortunately, more than entries kept by appearing so I kept looking.  By opening one of the .eml, I discovered my own responsibility that I attach to outgoing emails if I have my server acted as a mail relay.  I checked for this and I have been clean.  I kept searching in the .eml and discovered different origins IPs of the Internet.  Am I right to assume that my mail server is BOMBED or attacked with emails with false return addresses and my mail server sends return NDR for spammers/compromised machines on the net?  I tried to stop the exchange services and tried to rename the vsi file 1 to something else as one of the suggested MSKB, but the file was protected.  How can I stop this, it's slowing down my mail server and fill out my HD.  I can't block the IP to shippers because it comes from everywhere.  Help!  There are about 2 to 5 new .eml created every minute!

  TKS and best regards,

  LT

  Hi Lennet,

  Your question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the forum TechNet for assistance:

  Microsoft Exchange Server

  Hope the helps of information.

• Outlook 2007 is limitation of message size, although there is no restriction of message on the Exchange 2003 server.

  When one of my users trying to reach a 50 MB file to an e-mail message, Outlook 2007 immediately appears with the following message: the attachment size exceeds the allowable limit.  The user is not even allowed to attach the file such as Outlook it immediately blocked.  We have a 10 MB limit for messages that leave the organization.  This user has attempted to send the file to another Member of our Organization. In Outlook 2003, we are able to send 50 MB files to another without problem. Does anyone have any suggestions? I wonder if there is a setting in Outlook 07 which limits the size of an attachment. The confusing part is that he was not yet able to attach the file.

  OS: XP Pro 64-bit
  Suite Office 2007
  Exchange 2003

  Thank you!

  Hello

  1 you need to set the maxRequestLength value in the web.config file to a value greater than 50 MB. The maxRequestLength value in the web.config file is a parameter ASP.NET prevents applications greater than a certain length that has been added to prevent DOS attacks. He is set to 30 MB by default and must be increased in order to send attachments more than 30 MB. This could also be declined to enforce a lower limit.

  2. you need to increase the MaxSubmitMessageSize which is a property of the mailbox of readonly (MaxSubmitMessageSize = 0x666D0003) and this is where we reach the limit of 10 MB.

  It is read from the following locations:

  1. First reading of the object the user mailbox
  2. If not found as indicated by "unlimited", Transport Settings Container
  3. If not found as indicated by "unlimited", Org (read default Org container) container

  To set the value, use the following tasks in the Exchange Management Shell:

  1 set-transportconfig MaxSendSize (this is KBS) and then assign 51200 for 50 MB attachments. This will put it to all users

  Or

  2 set-mailbox and set the MaxSendSize (this is KBS) to 51 200 for attachments of 50 MB forspecific to a set of users.

  Once you set or the other, you must recycle store or not access to the mailbox for 15-20 minutes (to allow to store the cache expire) so that the change in size to have effect. In addition, the property is stored in AD and submitted to replication delays.

  One last thing that you should be aware of (sorry, the list will just):

  We have a timeout of 60 minutes for any attachment request or download attachment query (in OWA basic and Premium). So if you try to download an attachment 50 MB on a 56 Kbps connection, you will then expire and get a HttpWebException (e.g., the max upload is about 25 MB on a 56 Kbps connection).

  So, to sum up, there are two keys to send a large attachment:

  1 ASP.NET change web.config settings.

  2 modify the MaxSendSize using the set-TransportConfig (for all users) or Set-Mailbox for individual users.

  And you must

  3 ensure that the total download time will be less than 60 minutes (depending on your size and the speed of your network link)

  The web.config change is immediate, but the MaxSendSize change takes time, because of the caching strategy (the letter box, DSAccess deadlines and delays in replication cache).

  Examples:

  Changes to Web.Config

  By default, web.config under OWA virtual directory (Microsoft\Exchange Server\ClientAccess\Owa) will have the following entry (by default, the maximum request size is about 30 MB):

  ....

  Change to where X is the value you want in KBs. 50 MB, X will be of approximately50000

  Change the size limit of messages by user

  Go in the Exchange Management Shell and type the following command:

  Set-mailbox - id: "username" - MaxSendSize:50000

  Where "username" is the identity of the mailbox. This will set the limit to send message to about 50 MB. You need to restart the store to see the effect immediately.

  Change the size limit for messages of all users

  Go in the Exchange Management Shell and type the following command:

  -Set-transportconfig MaxSendSize: 50000

  This will set the limit to send message to about 50 MB. You need to restart the store to see the effect immediately.

• Problem syncing blackBerry Z10 Z10 Exchange 2003

  Z10 os 10.2.1.537 - exchange 2003 / outlook 2010 (cached mode)

  When I open outlook 2010 on my pc, the new messages are syncronised well from exchange. After my Z10 E-mail properly synchronized. When I close my pc outlook and I get out of my office, my Z10 stop to sync email until I return back and restart outlook.

  With a BB os7, everything works fine.

  solved!

  the problem is McAfee Groupshield for Exchange server.

  Must enable proactive analysis on e-mail file to correctly enable connections from Iphone/Android/BB smart os10, after the closure of the station of office outlook.

• Exchange 2003 FrontEnd Server Down, Bank of messages of the unit down.

  Hello

  The configuration of the Exchange 2003 environment with 1 Server frontend and backend (cluster) 2 servers. The Exchange FrontEnd server is down due to the problem of relay service. All outlook and exchange related services clients are point directly to the server main exchange. This cause of unity is unable to store voice messages in the exchange store. When subscribers call for unity, system will tell the Bank to the user messages are temporary offline. How re - configure the unit to make it appear the message store? Below is the version of the unit.

  Cisco Unity Version 4.0

  Build number 4.0 (3) SR 1

  Windows Server Version Microsoft Windows 2000 version 2195 (Service Pack 3)

  Pls advise.

  Thanking in advance for your help.

  The guide of reconfiguration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/voicesw/ps2237/products_upgrade_guides_chapter09186a0080205a7f.html

  Thank you

  Keith

• Help with unit 4.2 w / Exchange 2003

  the documentation states that when you use W/2003 and Exchange 2003 with the 4.2 than Exchange unit must be charged on a separate box. Is it because of the limitations of the processor, or is there a compatibility issue? For a laboratory facility, and will only have about 10 boxes set up if that makes a difference.

  This is due to the limits of performance. Note this limitation will be removed in unity 5.0, when our default OS became Windows 2003 and Exchange 2003 becomes the default message store. Unity 5.0 will always support Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000.

• Voice on Exchange 2003 Cluster connector?

  I have a small question regarding to where to install a voice connector.

  We currently have a voice connector installed on a stand-alone server Exchange 2003 (running Windows 2000 Server).

  It is configured to connect to our bridge of unity via VPIM server.

  We want to install the connector on the voice on our Exchange 2003 Cluster (two Exchange servers, running Windows 2003 Server) if possible.

  The problems for me this or not do this? Or is it better to keep it on a stand-alone Exchange Server?

  I don't know since we are talking about two Exchange servers configured in a cluster and there may be additional licenses involved, etc..

  Thank you

  It seems that the implementation of bridge on a cluster is not supported by Microsoft.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/voice_ip_comm/bridge/31/Networking/Guide/31ex_5x/31cubnetex.html

  Implementation of voice for the network bridge connector

  "Install the connector of the votes on any Exchange 2000 or Exchange 2003 server that is not part of an Exchange cluster (Microsoft doesn't support connectors from third on an Exchange cluster server)." Although the voice connector can be installed on the Cisco Unity Server (when Exchange is also on the server), it is not recommended for performance reasons. "

  Please note