Evaluation of Posture ISE

Similar Questions

• Is AnyConnect module - mandatory to install/configure all three VPN, NAM & Posture module ISE 1.3 for evaluation of posture

  Hi Experts,

  I installing Anyconnect point doubt:

  We want to go for web-deployment of head of network device that is ISE for the assessment of posture, however I came across the document where its mentioned the installation with the three modules:

  (1) VPN

  (2) NAM

  (3) module posture

  I am only concerned to posture to check on enterprise wireless users until I have to configure all of the modules in customer provisioning?

  There is no existing with Anyconnect client configuration. No ASA as n for my case. I have WLC acting as n.

  so after that customer gets auth 802.1 x, customer must redirect to posture help control Anyconnect. and its new deployment where the customer is not having this agent software.

  If please guide me with the right direction for Anyconnect deployment for single control of posture and how customers can get this downloaded automatically agent is my main concern.

  For assessment of posture, just deploy the "Module of Posture". The "NAM" module is used only when you want to replace the native Windows supplicant. The "VPN" module is used for anyconnect VPN.

  The posture can be hosted in the ISE and be put into service at the endpoints via a Client Provisioning rule. However, users must have the appropriate privilege to perform the installation of the package. In many organizations, users have NO such privileges. If this is your case, so you must deploy the Posture Module via GPO/System Center or another equivalent system.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Evaluation of posture before logon - possible with ISE?

  Does anyone know if it is possible (or not) to have a machine postural windows valued at startup? That is to say. until someone connects to this topic. Currently I have to connect to my machine before the start of the assessment. It would be good to have assessment begins as soon as the machine starts while (assuming the machine passes assessment) it is completed by the time wherever I am. We use the NAC Agent with ISE1.2.

  Thanks in advance for your ideas.

  AFAIK, the agent of posture is no nothing until the user is connected, I never saw a report of position at ise, that indicates anything about it either, because you would get many posture compliance checks failed, if she did (audit of key, user, av status files and so on in the land of the machine).

• Evaluation of posture transmitted by mistake using Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  I would like to help try to understand why a customer who has not been connected to the network for a little over a month has allowed full network access despite being older than 28 days AV definitions.

  We have 2 mandatory requirements of posture,

  1 Symantec Av MUST be installed

  2. the definitions AV MUST be expired LESS THAN 28 days

  Currently, the machine I have watch the defs AV as being 25 March 2013.

  When I produce the detailed report posture, it shows me even that the two mandatory requirements described above were successfully which means that the endpoint is compliant posture. Clearly this is not the case if...!

  Is there anything else I can check on the ISE to help debug this?

  Mario

  Hello

  You may have two problems:

  1 al ' ISE, you have a set global clients not supported of the NAC Agent (Android, etc.) that specifies what their default state of compliance. If the default setting is "consistent" and you do not have a rule in this customer service or you simply do not have client provisioning rules, any machine that does not fit in the provisioning rule (IE thinks them ISE which is not supported) Gets a consistent event compliance status if NAC Agent is installed and that the rules are not met.

  2. problem of ANC Agent version?

  I saw in the papers that you use NAC 4.9.1.6 agent but the latest NAC Agent recommended to be used with (later) ISE is version 4.9.0.51.

  4.9.1.6 is a version of NAC Appliance and Cisco does not guarantee that is 100% compatible with ISE.

  Check

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html#wp78131

  Cisco NAC Agent Interoperability Between NAC Appliance and Identity Services Engine (ISE)
  Cisco supports different versions of the NAC Agent for integration with  NAC Appliance and ISE. Current releases are developed to work in either  environment, however, interoperability between deployments is not  guaranteed. Therefore, there is no explicit interoperability support for  a given NAC Agent version intended for one environment that will  necessarily work in the other. If you require support for both NAC  Appliance and ISE using a single NAC Agent, be sure to test NAC Agent in  your specific environment to verify compatibility.
  Unless there is a specific defect or feature required for your NAC  Appliance deployment, Cisco recommends deploying the most current agent  certified for your ISE deployment. If an issue arises, Cisco recommends  restricting the NAC Agent's use to its intended environment and  contacting Cisco TAC for assistance. Cisco will be addressing this issue  through the standard Cisco TAC support escalation process, but NAC  Agent interoperability is not guaranteed.
  Cisco is working on an approach to address NAC Agent interoperability testing and support in an upcoming release.
  

• Problem with update 1.2 Posture ISE

  ISE 1.2 message below is showed when we do an update of manual or automatic web posture.

  "Remote address is not accessible. Please make sure that updated feed url, proxy address and proxy port are configured properly."

  It worked very well for a long time and all of a sudden it has stopped working
  and no changes were made on the network side.
  https://www.Cisco.com/Web/secure/pmbu/posture-update.XML works in the browser.

  Some customers have reported the same. Boxes are installed with the latest version of patch 7.

  We can download updates via offline.

  I had the same problem. Both the posture feed URL updated

  1. https://www.cisco.com/web/secure/pmbu/posture-update.xml

  2. https://www.perfigo.com/ise/posture-update.xml

  giving the same error, when ISE boxes try to do updates. But these URLs are accessible from the outside.

  A TCP dump from a watch as "Unkown Alert certificates" box (when he tries to update) for the certificate received from the other end. Then the box ISE sends a (FIN, ACK) and ends the session.

  The relevant pcap file is attached

  capture-img - cisco.png

  

• Evaluation of posture for IE11

  Hi all

  I'm looking for more help with setting up an assessment of posture in ISE that will check to see a machine IE 11 is installed. The policy will run in audit mode.

  No the svcVersion key contains version, just look in the windows registry, you will see.

• Posture ISE 1.3 Inline node

  Hello

  who can explain the function of the posture inline node? What functionality are related to this type of node?

  That's right, assuming it's the flavor of Cisco's cost (which is partly based on pairs of RADIUS A - V that use Cisco Vendor-Specific Attributes or VSA).

  Third party n can support cost normalised (via RFC 3576 and 5176) and not necessarily work with ISE. Aerohive is an example I know.

• Obligation of posture ISE to check if the USP of the endpoint port is disabled

  Hello

  I wonder if it is possible to define the USP Port disabled in the endpoints as a requirement in the Posture of the ISE?

  Appreciate your comments.

  Mike

  If your question relates to the ability of the ISE, the disabling of the USB port on a PC, the answer is no.

  The NAC agent using, however, you can check various programs and may be able to check the status of the USB.

  You will need to create a new Condition of Posture and corrections.

  The condition that I will use in this example is a registry key.

  If the "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\UsbStor\Start" key has a value of 3, the USB is enabled.  A value of 4 is disabled.

  So set a Condition of Posture:

  Click policy > policy elements > Conditions

  

  Posture , choose the left menu:

  

  Then choose Registry Condition in the left menu.

  Click on + Add to add a new Condition of Posture:

  

  Then, you must create remediation Actions.  Click the results button at the top of the left Menu:

  

  Choose the repair Actions then reclamation that you want to use.  I chose the link cleanup.

  + Add to add a new link to the corrective measures:

  

  Requirements , choose the menu on the left, and then create a new result of remediation:

  

  Of course, you can choose different corrections if necessary for your environment.

  Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

  Charles Moreton

• Discovery of Posture ISE missing in Auth profiles

  Hi all. I have worked on the following document, but has difficulty finding the "Discovery of the Posture" option in the authorization profiles.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bba10d.shtml

  The device allowed trial (basic and advanced). In short, I'm fighting for work on what I have missed to enable discovery of posture any help would be appreciated.

  Select the 'Web Authentication' box, then the "Discovery of the Posture" option in the menu drop down and enter the ACL

• REQUIRED: ISE 1.1.3 Posture Setup and Config Switch (ACL, dACL)

  Hello

  anyone could please posture ISE configuration screenshot (and sanitation)

  I need urgently a DACL and a redirect ACL who work at least in a laboratory of the model.

  Political authentication and authorization is not necessary.

  policies of posture and sanitation is not necessary.

  The question is ACLs (I guess)

  It must be a valid switch configuration file, with ACL (if necessary) an ethernet DOT1x port.

  My IOS is 122.55 SE or 52 SE

  Thank you in advance.

  Best regards.

  C.

  ACL to redirect the URL on the access switch

  access # conf taccess (config) #-access ip extended ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT list

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any any eq field

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any host <> eq 8905

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any host <> eq 8906

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq 8443

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq 8905

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq www

  Access (NaCl-ext-config) # ip allow a whole

  Access (config-ext-nacl

  a DACL that restricts access to the network of endpoints that do not conform to posture.

  Name

  POSTURE_REMEDIATION

  Description

  Allow access to the posture and rehabilitation services and prohibits any access. General http and https for redirection only permits.

  Content of the DACL

  allow udp any any eq field

  allow icmp a whole

  allow any host tcp <> eq 8443

  Ermit tcp any any eq 80

  permit any any eq 443 tcp

  allow any host tcp <> eq 8905

  allow any host udp <> eq 8905

  allow any host udp <> 1 eq 8906

  allow any host tcp <> eq 80

• Posture of ISE for delayed services.

  Hello everyone

  I'm just trying to find a way to delay the evaluation of posture because some monitored services are delayed on initialize-toward the top. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  Guido

  Just give more time to run in your posture for anyconnect profile, so once the service has started posture it gets the status of 'compliant. You could also do a repair action, trying something several times, with an interval shorter to get the posture to detect service is running faster.

• Cisco Secure Access Control System vs ISE

  Can someone tell me what the difference between these two systems?  Is there a function on one that I can't use on the other hand?

  GANYMEDE + to start.  No Ganymede on ISE in its current form.  I'm basically transition all the radius user based auth in ISE and keeping from Ganymede ACS auth admin.  ACS no DACL, but only based on user or group membership.  ISE's DACL based on very customizable rules and evaluation of posture.

• Support for OS Linux in Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  Can someone help me to know. If any Linux OS posture assessment is available in ISE like Windows & MAC OS.

  Hello Mohsin-

  Evaluation of posture is not currently supported on Linux-based devices. For more information on currently supported devices, controls, etc. see the following link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-3/admin_guide/b_ise_admin_guide_13/b_ise_admin_guide_sample_chapter_010111.html

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Difference between ISE and NAC?

  Dear all,

  Can you please help to understand difference ISE and NAC?

  Thank you

  Eve.

  ACS + NAC Profiler + comments the NAC + Manager = EHT NAC NAC Server

  ISE does:

  Centralized strategies
  RADIUS server
  Evaluation of posture
  Guest access services
  Profiling feature
  MDM
  Monitoring
  Troubleshooting
  Reporting

• ISE authorization policy issues

  Hello team,

  I m having trouble in my implementation: the PC of the user never gets address IP of the VLAN access after AuthZ successful political.

  I have two VLANS in my implementation:

  ID VLAN 802 for authentication (subnet 10.2.39.0)

  VLAN ID 50 for Access (subnet Y.Y.Y.Y) users

  When I start my PC of the user, I get IP for VLAN 802 (10.2.39.3) and the process after the Posture, ISE inform the switch to put the PC user port in 50 of VLAN.

  Here I have my Port Configuration on the switch:

  interface GigabitEthernet0/38
  switchport access vlan 802
  switchport mode access
  switchport nonegotiate
  switchport voice vlan 120
  IP access-group ACL by DEFAULT in
  authentication event fail following action method
  action of death event authentication server reset vlan 50
  action of death event authentication server allow voice
  the host-mode multi-auth authentication
  authentication order dot1x mab
  authentication priority dot1x mab
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  restrict the authentication violation
  MAB
  dot1x EAP authenticator
  dot1x tx-time 10
  spanning tree portfast
  end

  And here, I took out political AuthZ in Action:

  7 Oct 09:22:01.574 ANG: % DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: authentication successful for the client (0022.1910.4130) on the Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  7 Oct 09:22:01.582 ANG: % AUTHMGR-5-VLANASSIGN: 50 VLAN assigned to Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  7 Oct 09:22:01.591 ANG: % EMP-6-POLICY_REQ: IP 0.0.0.0. MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | EVENTS APPLY
  7 Oct 09:22:01.591 ANG: % EMP-6-AAA: POLICY xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | DOWNLOAD EVENT-REQUEST
  7 Oct 09:22:01.633 ANG: % EMP-6-AAA: POLICY xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | DOWNLOAD-SUCCESS EVENT
  7 Oct 09:22:01.633 ANG: % EMP-6-IPEVENT: IP 0.0.0.0. MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | IP-WAITING FOR EVENT
  SWISNGAC8FL02 #.
  7 Oct 09:22:02.069 ANG: AUTHMGR-5-SUCCESS percent: authorization succeeded for customer (0022.1910.4130) on the Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  SWISNGAC8FL02 #.
  7 Oct 09:22:02.731 ANG: % EMP-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.39.3 | MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | IP-ASSIGNMENT OF EVENT
  7 Oct 09:22:02.731 ANG: % EMP-6-POLICY_APP_SUCCESS: IP 10.2.39.3 | MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | POLICY_TYPE named ACL. POLICY_NAME xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | RESULT SUCCESS

  After that, I have:

  SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh auth sess int g0/38
  Interface: GigabitEthernet0/38
  MAC address: 0022.1910.4130
  IP address: 10.2.39.3
  Username: SNL\enzo.belo
  Status: Authz success
  Field: VOICE
  Security policy: must ensure
  State of security: unsecured
  Oper host mode: multi-auth
  Oper control dir: both
  Authorized by: authentication server
            Policy of VLAN: 50
  ACL ACS: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6
  The session timeout: N/A
  Idle timeout: N/A
  The common Session ID: 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  ACCT Session ID: 0x000001A7
  Handle: 0x710000F7

  Executable methods list:
  The method state
  dot1x Authc success
  MAB does not work
  !

  Apparently, everything is OK, but isn't. The PC of the user never gets the IP address of the access VLAN 50

  If I SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh - table mac address | 0022.1910.4130 Inc.
  50 0022.1910.4130 STATIC Gi0/38
  802 0022.1910.4130 STATIC Gi0/38

  And

  SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh EMP session summary
  EMP Session information
  -----------------------
  Total number of sessions seen so far: 17
  Total number of active sessions: 1

  IP address MAC address VLAN interface Audit Session Id:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GigabitEthernet0/38 10.2.39.3 0022.1910.4130 802 0A022047000000F6126E9B17

  My switch is a Cisco IOS software, the software C3560E (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0 (2) SE6, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)

  I use the Version ISE 1.2.1.198 Patch Info 2

  Could you help me in this case?

  Best regards

  Daniel Stefani

  It seems that the PC is underway in the field of VOICE according to the cmd auth sess int that you have demonstrated. Do you think this has something to do with your problem? I knew a few PC have problem with that.

  If you could, try to get the PC to operate in the field of DATA by sending is not the voice of ISE after permission attribute.