Extend a network of comments with AEBS and TC set up a connection

Similar Questions

• Best way to extend the network of Apple using Cat5 and wireless, but with access to the same network

  Appreciate any help here.

  I need to extend my network coverage for the part out of my house where the current signal does not cover.

  I have a Time capsule in the office connected to my Modem and then created a wireless (XXXX) network that connects to the extreme in my front room... .well when I'm in my room before the signal does not increase when I go near the extreme... and maybe it's that I'm still picking up XXX to my Time Capsule wireless network.

  I'm just a Cat5 cable around the House and I was wondering if I can connect the TC to the extreme via CAT5 and therefore the extreme would be able to stream my network wireless XXXX?

  If I then want to connect to another airport (explicit / extreme or even TC) in the part of my house which currently gets no signal... then do cela via Cat5 to the EXTREME at the 3rd device... or must it come directly from the TC?   (and again... the 3rd device will also be able to broadcast the network XXXX?

  Ideally, I want the network to be possible STB and flavours around the House, and I think that the connections between Ethernet devices would accomplish that... but I also need the i-devices, streaming boxes etc. around my house to then access the XXXX wifi network I have printers, VPN, etc all together towards the top on.

  Oh... and 1 other point, I have a cisco 8port 10/100POE switch managed... which I would also like to include in the network to connect to the servers and devices IP etc... is - it possible... and that has to be directly connected to the time Capsule and could I still use it to take place between the TC and the 3rd Apple Airport device... as above?

  Hope that makes sense... but please let me know if you need more details.

  I'm just a Cat5 cable around the House and I was wondering if I can connect the TC to the extreme via CAT5

  Yes. Hate to be picky here, but I hope you'll use CAT5, CAT5e cabling being quite a bit obsolete.

  wireless network and if so the extreme would be able to stream my XXXX?

  Yes

  If I then want to connect to another airport (explicit / extreme or even TC) in the part of my house which gets currently no signal... then do cela via Cat5 to the EXTREME at the 3rd device

  Yes, but it would be preferable to cables to connect the 3rd to the main TC, if that's an option.

  or does have to come directly from the TC?

  No, but it would be better if she could, if this is an option.

  and once again... the 3rd device will also be able to broadcast the network XXXX?

  Yes

  and I think that the connections between Ethernet devices would achieve this

  That is right. Ethernet is always the best choice in terms of performance.

  but I also need the i-devices, streaming boxes etc. around my house to then access the XXXX same wifi network I printer, VPN, etc all together towards the top on.

  That should work well.  However, you may not aware that most of the PC and iOS devices not 'automatically' between different wireless access points as they move from one place to the other.  For example, you have your iPhone near the time Capsule, so he'll be looking for a strong signal from the time Capsule. If you move the close AirPort Extreme iPhone or any other device 3rd... the iPhone usually will stay connected to wireless Time Capsule... even if a stronger signal may be available in another wireless access point. Nature of the beast with IOS devices.

  Thus, with most of the PC and iOS devices, you will have to get used to temporarily turn off the WiFi on the iOS device when you move from one place to the other, then re - turn on WiFi once the device is close to the other wireless access point. The iOS device then generally will pick up the strongest signal from the nearest access point.

  Portable Mac computers will generally do a good job of automatically 'switching' to pick up the best signal of different access points in you walking the laptop around the House.

  I have a cisco 8port 10/100POE switch managed... which I would also like to include in the network to connect to the servers and devices IP etc... It is possible.

  Yes, but the Time Capsule and AirPort Extreme Gigabit Ethernet ports or 10/100/1000, then the switch is going to limit the maximum speed on the network at 100 Mbps when the devices are capable of much higher speed.  If you plan to invest in the installation of Ethernet wiring around the House, then you also want to invent a new Gigatibit Ethernet 10/100/1000 switch, because it will allow up to 10 times faster compared to a 10/100 switch network connections.

  can do this via Cat5 to the EXTREME at the 3rd device... or need to come directly from the TC?

  Yes, but it would be best to connect the switch to the time Capsule if it is an option.

  and could I still use it to take place between the TC and the 3rd Apple Airport device... as above?

  Yes

• problems with vista and microsoft set 32-bit or 64-bit.

  try to solve the problems with vista and microsoft fix it.  This error code 0 x 800400154 came up saying that they finish their using 32 bit and I have a 64 bit what they say.

  What version of the operating system Windows am I running?

  Windows 32-bit or 64-bit

  What Microsoft FixIt you try to run?  (There are MANY of them - they are simply the written scripts that do the manual steps in the KB article for you).

• Bridged Networking problem - comments may be crazy, but nothing else can connect

  I have a few bridged networks confusion works correctly under VMWare Workstation 11. Installation is VMWW running on a Windows Server R2 2012 host with a Ubuntu LTS 14.04 server prompt.

  Windows Server has a physical NETWORK adapter that is configured with two IP addresses.  For the sake of argument, that I will call the first IP 1.1.1.1 (255.255.255.192 subnet mask) and the IP secondary 2.2.2.1 (netmask 255.255.255.224).  Real IP addresses are all publicly routable.

  In my computer, the network configuration is set to "bridged".  Inside of the Ubuntu VM, networking is defined as follows:

  2.2.2.2 IP address

  255.255.255.224 subnet

  Gateway 2.2.2.1

  I can ping successfully the Ubuntu prompt from the Windows Server and other computers on the Internet, but cannot connect to any other service on the client (for example, SSH, HTTP, etc.), either from the host machine or any computer on the Internet. Note that both hosts and guests have their respective firewall disable for the moment.

  However, if I change the VM network config in my computer to be "NAT" and set the networking of Ubuntu on DHCP, all services on the client are accessible on the host Windows (for example, SSH, HTTP etc.) via a 192.168.x.x dealt with this workstation DHCP assigns the guest.

  I'm a bit puzzled as to why these services would be accessible to the NAT address, but not on the static IP address public when the latter may be ping from the host and other machines?  Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  OK, managed to solve it with a violin.  The resolution was to create a new virtual network adapter in the virtual network Editor.  It has been bridged, with the physical NETWORK adapter selected in the drop-down list 'Bridge '.  In this case, this has created VMnet2.  Then in the VMWare Workstation GUI, I edited the network adapter settings to select VMNet2 in Network Configuration options.

  No idea why it did not work with VMNet0 at first, but still...

• I don't know if I have an acct? I have firefox synch with mobile and another computer but cannot connect here

  Set up my new laptop and smartphone grabbed me from the user names and passwords in all directions. I thought I configured Firefox with an ACCT. I know that I made the successful synchronization operation so I how do I know if I have an acct Setup. I certainly have one now that I had to register to get help. There are a number of different acct on Firefox?

  Each Mozilla Web site or the service has it's own logins. This support forum, Firefox Sync services, the modules support forum, Bugzilla, etc.. I use the same username and password for all except for Sync, which has a different format, to make it easy, but each of them must be configure each one separately.

  If you already have all that data saved in Firefox on an old PC, it is not all that hard to get this data into another installation of Firefox Office then use Sync "synchronize" these data with the mobile device. See this support article:
  
  http://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/recovering+important+data+from+an+old+profile

• Windows 7 backup network share, name of user and password set cached?

  One of the users in our area decided that it was recommended to configure backup in Windows 7 to save backups to a network share on a Windows 2008 R2 server.

  Not a bad idea, however, she got asked to enter his user name and password, which she did.

  Now the user keeps getting locked (even if it re - enter the user name and password.)

  If it starts a new backup, it seems that the user gets locked immidiatley.

  This used to happen from time to time even if we disabled the scheduled backup.

  We tried to run rundll32.exe keymgr.dll, KRShowKeyMgr to see if there was something stored we could withdraw, but we could not find anything related to the backup.

  Any input?

  (Now I don't know how this is supposed to work, but I don't think that it is a very good solution for companys strict password and passwords expire. It is perhaps mainly designed for the less complicated home networks?)

   

  Hi Erikmy,

  Thanks for posting in the Microsoft Community.

   

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums.

  I would recommend posting your query in the link below.

  Windows Server forums:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

  I hope that the information above helps you.

• Problem with Javascript and ActionScript setting / getting variable timing

  Hello world

  The course

  I created a training course, which will run standalone on our intranet for internal staff. Despite the (known) limitations, I use Javascript to validate the form and open a window of e-mail, for the staff member to click Send confirm that they have completed the course. Without a web server or LMS to use, what seems easiest to obtain confirmation of completion of the course. The form itself works very well and we have tested it with some members of staff.

  I created a slide in Captivate that contains the form of confirmation with a "submit" button. I added a next button, which appears disabled until the user submits the form successfully.

  The problem

  When the user clicks on send, I call a conditional Action as follows:

  • If 1 = 1 (i.e. always do this)
    • Javascript call for:
      • Validate the form
      • If it is valid
        • Open e-mail window
        • Set m_VarHandle.Confirmation_Email = 1
  • If Confirmation_Email = 1
    • Select the next button

  Unfortunately, by filling out the form correctly and clicking on send, the next button is not enabled (the fine again active button). On further testing, it seems that the Javascript has finished running before ActionScript moves on the next decision. So when he checks the value of Confirmation_Email it has not yet been fixed and the next button is not enabled.

  Any ideas how I can fix this problem?

  Thank you

  Sarah.

  Hello world

  I bypassed this problem as follows.

  • Added a Clickbox that appears for 0.5 seconds with a break
  • Created a disabled button is visible in the output, which is displayed for 0.8 second
  • Updated the timeline, so that the next button (active) appears after 0.8 seconds for the rest of the slide
  • Added a second Clickbox located to 1.0 second with a break at the end of the slide (2.0 seconds)
  • Updated Javascript code to set cpCmndResume to 1 when the form is validated successfully

  This results in the desired behavior:

  • The slide plays up to 0.5 seconds and stops due to the first Clickbox
  • The user can fill out the form at their leisure and submit.
    • If the validation fails, the user must correct the form and click on submit
    • If the validation is successful, the reading recovery
  • When playback is resumed, he passes the 0.8-second mark. The following disabled button disappears and the next active button appears. Playback continues until the second 2.0 mark then paused because of the second Clickbox
  • The user can click on Next at their leisure

  Thanks for all the reading - hope it will be useful!

  See you soon

  Sarah.

• RV016 and WAP321 with a network of comments

  I have two Cisco WAP321 AP and Cisco RV016 router.

  I use the RV016 as the DHCP server for the network.

  I would like to use the guest SSID mapped to a VLAN to issolate it the rest of the network.

  How can I configure the RV016 to carry the traffic of the customer both VLANS and VLAN internal internet while using it as a DHCP server.

  Thanks for any help.

  John McArthur

  Hey, it's essentially a non supported configuration. RV016 port supports only function VLAN and 1 single DHCP scope. If you want a staggered VLAN comments with the router something like a layer 3 switch must be put in place between the router and the AP to accommodate this configuration.

• Extend the network 1 Extreme and 1 Express

  I have the latest Airport Extreme, and I would like to extend my network to the floor with best performance.  I have the ability to connect to an Airport Express Terminal via an Ethernet cable.  My question is this... If I set up a roaming network using the Express connected via a Cat5 cable or Cat6 will be broadcasting from the Express (capable of) wireless A/B/G/N/AC channels?  Or he can do A/B/G/N?  Assuming that I bought the last Airport Express Terminal.  Or, if I wanted to AC that I have to use a second Airport Extreme?

  The Airport Express is not capable, "ac", so if you want to use "ac" of speed signals more high, you'll need another AirPort Extreme.

  In both cases, you can use Configuration Apple 'Wizard' to automatically configure the AirPort Express or Airport Extreme for a network roaming... than Apple installation called 'Spread with Ethernet' in their installation utility.

• With the help of a second domestic airport to extend the network

  I have an Airport Extreme (MD031LL/A), connected to a modem via an ethernet cable and it works perfectly as a WiFi router for my house. I have also an Airport Express (MC414LL/A) I want to use as a second router to extend the reach of the Wifi signal, which works when connected via a cable to the Airport Extreme (continuous green light), but when I unplug the ethernet cable the Airport Express falls out of the network (Amber led flashing). I've updated the router time firmwear and repowered and reset everything, including 'forget' the devices via the Airport utility which I got on my MacBook Pro, but not luck. Books Online says the network should see the second router, waiting with flashing light amber, but it does not work.

  Any suggestions?

  Please note, it is not ideal for me running extended ethernet cable, I would like to as the relay to be wireless.

  I am assuming that you are using a Mac running a current or recent operating system... or... you use the installer on an iPhone or an iPad, right?

  If you want the AirPort Express to extend wireless signal in AirPort Extreme... then you would not use an Ethernet cable to the configuration... Since the installer detects the Ethernet connection and configure the AirPort Express Terminal accordingly.

  However, if you are able to locate the Airport Express where you need more coverage... and... an Ethernet cable from the Express back to AirPort Extreme... which must remain connected permanently... This would be the way to go.  The reason is that you will lose about half of the potential speed on the entire network when you try to Express to extend the network using a wireless connection.

  But, if you can not run the cable, you can not.  If you need a little more advice on installation, after return to confirm how the Express connect to AirPort Extreme and let us know what operating system is installed on the device you will use to configure the Express.

• Extend the network wireless with roaming function

  Hello

  I was looking for some advice on my project to the top. I currently have my SKY router (wifi off) connected to an older time capsule which is almost full, so I'm about to buy a new one and I can use the old one plus one new airport extreme/express to extend the network of thought. I think three points would be best as its quite a large sector, I wish to address. I would like that it either under one SSID using the roaming capabilities I've read are possible with the airports and would hand off a signal strong etc.

  Unfortunately, I don't have the option of it being fully wired but planned to use the powerline rather than wifi adapters because I don't want to lose too much speed. I use power lines now an extension of netgear and performance are pretty good with very little loss, although the multiple SSID bothers me so want to change.

  Can someone advise if the setting above would work or if there is a better way (without cabling package together) and if I would be best for extreme or the express for the 3rd point?

  If anyone has any configuration Advisor if this is the best set up then that would be also appreciated?

  Thank you very much

  Iain

  I use power lines now an extension of netgear and performance are pretty good with very little loss, although the multiple SSID bothers me so want to change.

  Configure each extension to use the exact same network name (SSID), the same level of security wireless and same password wireless. Then you will have a roaming network.

• What is the right way to extend a network with two stations 80211ac wireless fixed extreme apple via ethernet?

  I my house wired with ethernet and have logged as many devices via cat5e as possible. My problem is when I try to connect together the two apple airport extreme base stations and use the second to extend my network I lose the internet connection.  I am able to extend without problems via radio, but since I plugged in the House tried to take advantage of the fastest method by cable.

  Here's my network setup in a nut shell.

  In the basement, I have my router from Verizon Fios (gateway 80211n) currently configured to provide all the space an Ip address via dhcp (disabled wireless)

  Gigabit ethernet port 8 wired via gigabit switch through the cable between the bridge Fios and port 1 of the switch.

  two iMacs wired directly the fios gateway ports 2 and 3

  Base station extreme elementary apple (call it down at the moment) connected to the Fios bridge

  Extreme basestation secondary apple related to extreme primary apple base station

  Cable to switch TV

  Nintendo Wii connected to the switch U

  Apple TV connected to the switch

  Drive Blu - ray connected to the switch

  My mainly the Airport extreme is configured as follows

  connect via DHCP

  Address of the router is set to the Fios router

  FOR DNS, I used back free servers like Google, and level 3

  Wireless is set to create a wireless network

  Security is set to WPA2 Personal

  Turned on 5 GHz and 2.4 and 5 ghz are set to automatic

  Router mode is set to bridge mode off

  Second or first floor Airport extreme config

  Connect using dhcp

  Address of the router is also the Fios router

  Servers DNS is empty

  Wireless settings

  Network is set to extend a wireless network

  the wireless network name reflects my network

  wpa2 personal wireless security game

  Network

  Router mode is grayed out and pondered or bridge mode

  Second or first floor Airport extreme config...

  .. . Network is set to extend a wireless network

  Given that all routers are interconnected by Ethernet, you don't want to configure AirPort Extreme to "Extend a wireless network." This option should be used only if the connection between the wireless base stations. Instead, the two base stations must be configured to "create a wireless network.  This is because that, with them all connected by Ethernet, you have the basis for a network of mobile type.

  With this type of network, each router will broadcast their own Wi - Fi network, but because they will all use the same network name (SSID) and use the same type of wireless security and the password, all the wireless clients will see them as network «one»

• Wireless and network of comments and HREAP

  Hello

  I inherited a wireless infrastructure that consists of a head office with WCS and WLC more LWAPP access points.

  There is a satellite office in another city who want to deploy a wireless infrastructure and it seemed to me like they want to only deploy a couple of AP that HREAP would be good to use this senario.

  However, they also want to use the network without comment thread that we at Headquarters but I don't want their guest to come to our DSL modem that we have put in place for the guest HO wireless traffic. The two offices are connected via a MPLS who no longer have need of traffic thereon.

  Is it possible to set up the HREAP and the WLC and WCS so that auxiliary office broke out locally for comments and even the admin Hall to HO can control the password?

  Thank you very much

  Hi Nell,

  the feature you're looking for is "local switching REAP H."

  So, you can set the access point remote mode H-REAP (which optimizes for "behind a WAN link") and from there, you can define multiple SSID as "local switching.

  This means that everything related to the phase of authentication is managed by WLC, but after authentication, traffic fell locally to the AP and not transit through the WLC.

  Guest SSID must be enabled for local switching, and then, on the APs REAP H, go to the configuration of the AP (in tab 'Wireless' WLC, then click ap) and on the hreap tab, you can configure the vlan where the traffic of comments will be abandoned at the remote site. It must be a vlan that exists on the remote site, and users will receive a DHCP address on this vlan.

  Kind regards

  Nicolas

• Wireless network is displayed with a cross and will not let me connect saying the settings for this network do not match the requirements of the networs and it is a hidden network how to make it visible again?

  hardware device

  my wireless network is displayed with a cross and will not let me connect saying settings for this network do not match the requirements of the networs and it is a hidden network how to make it visible again :(

  Hello

  What operating system installed on the computer?

  Note: Look for errors in the network card device manager.

  Method 1: Follow the article mentioned below, if you are using Windows 7 operating system.

  Using the troubleshooter from network in Windows 7

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/using-the-network-troubleshooter-in-Windows-7

  Method 2:

  He looks at the IP address and other parameters are not set correctly, I suggest you contact your Internet service provider or provider router wireless to help on this.

  For more information, follow the below mentioned article:

  Set up a wireless router:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/set-up-a-wireless-router

  Follow the below mentioned articles and see if they help you:

  Set up a wireless network:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/setting-up-a-wireless-network

  Wi - Fi and in Windows network connection issues:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

  Wireless network card: frequently asked questions:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/wireless-networking-frequently-asked-questions

• At my place of work, there are a data server with LAN and internet networking. I want to disable the internet connection before it is infected with the virus.

  At my place of work, there are a data server with LAN and internet networking. I want to disable the internet connection before it is infected with the virus.

  original title: server and virus problem

  Hi SurajMendon,

  Your Windows XP question is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the platform of networking on TechNet. Please post your question in the TechNet Windows XP Networking forum.

  Networking platform

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverPN/threads