Hitachi sister 7K 3000 on areca 1880ix-16 / 4GB

Similar Questions

• Hitachi sister read 80g 42g on Optiplex GX520

  I have Hitachi 80 GB and my Optiplex gx520 bed total of 42 GB used and free space?

  I tried on Samsung 250 GB and it read total of 42 GB?

  What evil?

  Enjoy and congratulate for this problem.

  kckg

  Some use Dell computers have a Media Direct button or the Media Direct functionality to load the operating system (Windows Xp was native with these options) and the drivers for the DVD player directly to the contrary having to turn on your computer ' "and have it load it all.  The idea was that if someone just wanted to read a CD or a video, would be less user needs...

  That being said, use these special and possibly other computers without the Media Direct "HPA" feature on the hard drive (HDD).  The HPA is the "host protected area", these Dell computers used for Storage Media Direct and function of the DSR (Dell system restore) feature, which also came with the PC.  This allowed the user to restore basically a BONE or a series of programs using a couple of keys corrupt or damaged...

  The problem, you've probably come across is that in cloning or copying exactly, your for the new drives of 80 GB or 250 GB HARD drive is that the MBR (master boot record) was also copied, telling the BIOS in your PC the new drive is the same as the old disk, even if in reality, we don't.  You must recover the space unallocated, taken over by the HPA.  This can be done in two ways.  I understand that the series of PC Optiplex are desktop computers, is that correct?  If so, I hope you have room for a second HDD, so you do not have to swap disks.  If you only have one drive Bay, you will need to swap hard drives AFTER you create the utility CD.

  Download the utility 'CD IMAGE' on the website HGST (Hitachi) to the title of the series 'Feature Tools' programs.  This is a free HARD disk utility which is designed for checking and restoring some Hitachi / HGST drives, but works on many others.  Once you have downloaded this file, burn it to a CD, which will create a bootable for use version.  Install the HARD drive you want to 'fix' in your PC and then boot from the CD.  Follow the prompts and (if your HARD drive is detected, and options to check the disk or repair it appear, you're in luck), click on "restore ability."  This should remove the LPD of the reader and make the unused available as unallocated space.  Once you have done this, leave the program and turn OFF your PC.  If you only have one drive Bay, re-install the main on your computer HARD drive and boot normally.  Install your second 'repaired' HARD drive in an external case ATA.  If you drive, just two bays normally start on the main drive.  Right-click on the "My Computer" or "Computer" desktop icon and select 'Manage' the traction in the menu dropdown.  When the new window appears, select 'Disk management' under the heading 'storage '.  A pictogram of your readers will appear.  Reader of '0' or your 'C:' will show on the top, another 'new' on the bottom drive.  The total size of the drive should show.  You will have a 42 GB partition which is what this drive was used when you originally copied on it, and then you should see the space as "Unallocated."  You may need to format this space.  Try to create a "Primary" partition right click on unallocated space and choosing the options shown.  If this does not work, get in shape this area.  Then create a new primary partition.  When this is done, if the player does not a drive letter (name) that are associated with, assign one.  According to the number of readers and devices you have connected to your PC, this may appear as "New E: drive" or "F:", etc.  Once you have created the new primary partition and assigned a drive letter name on your HARD drive, use a partition management tool to merge the partitions, a primary NTFS partition.  This should hopefully solve your problem.

  When you are done and want to use the (s) restored as the destination, use a program such as Norton Ghost (15.0 is the current version and is compatible with Win Xp) "Image" of your player; Do NOT CLONE it, or you will again copy the MBR and HPA for the destination drive.  Good luck - made - know us how you did it.

• Need help with HITACHI 7 K 2000 HDS722020ALA330 Installation on Xp sister

  I bought a hard drive 2 TB Hitachi sister, you can see in the Manager device, but when I get on my computer's not here, I'm runing a Windows xp Media Center Edition and I don't know what else to do

  In disk management, did mark the drive as active? It has been formatted?

  SC Tom
  -There is no such thing as TMI if you request technical support.

• With the 7 k 3000, with the AR4

  Well, I got bad news today. It's confirmed! I can't get the Hitachi 7 k 3000 readers I wanted. It was the last thing to complete my order. I watched the readers (always available) supported for the Areca 1880ix-16 and looked at the Seagate Constellation drives and disks Western Digital RE4. Given that the ability is not as important to the amount of training for speed, I ended up choosing the model WD RE4 500 GB 46 MB cache of. I needed to keep costs about the same price as the Hitachi 1.5 TB. Of course, I'll have 3 times less space... but then... I have 12 disks!  So not a real issue in any case for the space.

  Someone with an Areca RE4? How is reliability and performance?

  Yes, I have a 1880ix-12 Areca, get into a tower of 8 bays with 7x2TB drives WD RE4 (WD2003FYYS) with 1 x relief in a game of 12 to RAID3. I love them, and I get supported 700 MB/sec read, 750 MB/sec in writing medium in this series. You meet twelve discs in a game will be much faster than that. Post your results when you get set up... I'd be interested to see how 12 discs!

• Dimension 4500 unable to format sister 160

  I am trying to add a 160 GB Hitachi sister HARD drive as a second drive to a Dimension 4500, but when I try to format it using "Disk Management" the format reaches 100% and generates the message 'format was not completely successful. " The same message is displayed even for small partitions.

  OS - Windows XP Pro service pack 3

  BIOS - A04

  I even tried the "driver" on the page of Dell support with no effect (R64013).

  The computer appears to see the drive without problems, by signing up to a size of 149,05 GB.

  The disc is OK as I could format it without problem in another system.

  Where is the problem?

  
  

• Order this bomb at the end of the month!

  After weeks of planing, research and negotiation with my systems integrator, here's what I'll do (a few things to consider always). I get it through rental company, so I'm maximizing my components as much as possible, while remaining in the field of mental health. Example, SSD would have been nice... but... hehe!  Its a rigging not only for PremierePro, but also for After Effects, Photoshop and 3ds Max (where the Quadro and not the GTX).

  -Case: Lian-Li PC-A77F (to get as many disks as possible with adequate cooling) - Alternative Antec twelve hundred V3

  - Always looking for cages non-hotswap 4 x 3.5 "to 3 x 5.25" (or better), frame only for better air circulation. Suggestions?

  -Power supply: Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  -Motherboard: Asus Rampage Extreme III (better control for overclocking)

  -CPU: Intel i7 990 x (O.C. to 4.2 GHz or his speed/stability sweet-spot), with Antec Kuhler H2O 920

  -RAM: 24 GB, Dominator GT 2000 MHz C9 (2x12GB kit) and Airflow Fan II

  -System disk: 300 GB SATA3 Raptor

  -Disc: 2 x150 GB SATA2 Raptor (on the mobo, JBOD or RAID0, for zero, swap file, cache)

  -Disk: 12 x Hitachi sister 7 k 3000 SATA3 cache 64 MB 1.5 GB (RAID3 or 5, will run benchmarks to see what works best with this configuration)

  -RAID card: Areca ARC-1880ix-12, 4 GB of cache

  -Optical drives: burner Liteon Bluray IHSB112and Liteon IHAS124 DVD burner

  -GPU: PNY Quadro 5000

  E/s video: Blackmagic Design Decklink Extreme 3D

  -Monitor: NEC PA271W-BK-SV (27 "with calibrator IPS)

  -Adobe Production Premium (50% for FCP users... big time!)

  -The mouse and the keyboard: Logitech G500 and Logitech Illuminated Keyboard

  Any thoughts, observations and warnings before I officially order?

  Thank you

  Lian Li disc several cages, 3-2 and 4-3 with large fans. I always have several lying around.

  A suggestion, upgraded the 1880 the 16 or 24 ports version. Using two optical drives, you can easily adapt 19 records in this chassis.

  I am looking forward to receive your test results. You should be able to achieve a top-grade or very close to him... Great system. Really great.

• Please advice on my potential order

  Since the purchase of the chip of 3930 k I7 3 weeks ago, I was literally too busy with research projects and buying the rest of my new job.  I have now found a small window in my schedule to finally get this thing done, problem is that I still forget much of what I learned last 2 months.  So, if anyone of you, the more savvy people would be kind enough to give me your opinion and suggestions on the system, I'm about to buy, I would greatly appreciate your time and your knowledge!

  At the present time, I have dust collection: i7 3930 chip k, Thermaltake 1050W certified 80Gold, win 7, production premium cs5, autodesk entertainment creation suite.

  My budget is $ 3000.00 currently do only Canon 5 d stuff, but foresee R3d later in the year.  All prices and products are from newegg (although I can buy at amazon since I was the first).

  $549.99 - EVGA 03 G-P3-1595-AR GeForce GTX 580 (Fermi) classified ULTRA 3072 MB 384 - bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x 16 HDCP Ready SLI Support video card

  (Note: I see here a new GTX coming out at the end of this month, I need my system has been operational since this month, I should just buy a cheaper gtx 560? and wait?)

  $369.99 - ASUS P9X79 DELUXE LGA 2011 Intel X 79 SATA 6 Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX Intel motherboard with UEFI BIOS (even if I prefer a Council with an iEEE port)

  2 x $129.99 (for a total of 32 GB of ram) - G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16 GB (4 x 4 GB) 240 - Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 (PC3-14900) 1866, model of F3-14900CL9Q-16GBXL desktop memory

  $449.99 - areca ARC - 1222 PCIe x 8 SATA / SAS RAID card

  5 x $109.99 - Western Digital RE4 WD5003ABYX 500 GB 7200 RPM 64 MB Cache SATA 3.0 Gb / s 3.5 "drive hard internal-Bare drive

  (Note: to do a RAID 3 data with 4 discs with 1 drive backup, as these discs are on sale until the 3/12 so I buy them immediately if they are good to go)

  $169.99 OCZ Vertex 3 VTX3-25SAT3 - 120G 2.5 "120 GB SATA III MLC internal Solid State Drive (SSD)

  (reader program)

  $159.99 - HITACHI sister 7 K 3000 HDS723020BLA642 (0f12115) 2 TB 7200 RPM / MIN 64 MB of Cache SATA 6.0 GB/s 3.5 "drive hard internal-Bare drive

  (the universal player)

  $129.99 - Antec DF - 85 black computer case full Tower ATX, steel / plastic

  TOTAL: $2638,88
  

  EVGA video card is a good choice, but in fact, if the rumors are correct, the Kepler 6xx series will be announced soon. However, the accouncing and have them in stock at an outlet local are two different things, not to mention the high price right after the introduction.

  Alternative mobo ASUS could be the ASUS P9X79 WS, who has embedded IEEE.

  Check carefully that the Ripjaw X works on this mobo. IIRC for the 79 X series platform Ripjaw Z are the recommended range.

  Make sure that you put a fixed pagefile (min = max) of about 16 GB or even 32 GB in disk Hitachi slightly before you use it for something else to make sure the file is the first file on the disk and delete the pagefile from C: drive.

  To avoid too much written that OCZ SSD, make sure that you give to your C: by default file locations and an another drive location. This can apply to My Documents, my music, Cookies, Internet Cache, download, Internet History, Temp, Application Data, Common Application Data, etc.

  For the rest, it seems OK to me.

• FCP to Premiere

  Hello

  Although I have been using FCP professionally for more than seven years, I used initially first 4, 5 and 6 when I migrated from Beta SP band-to-band. The only thing that really bothers me on the first at that time was not necessarily that it crashed about 3 times a day, but when he crashed it corrupted my project file where I never had to make copies.

  Now I'm not saying FCP will never block, it very rarely does, but when he does he never, ever corrupted a file of project - I simply lost despite all of the work I've done since I last saved.

  So my question is, now that I have (in the next years, at least) to abandon the FCP, I am interested in the CS5.5 first on the Mac as a replacement and my initial experience of it is very good. I have not yet dared to cut a paid project on it however because I fear that it will eventually crash and damage my project file as in the good old days.

  Obviously, I can save copies every minute, but I was wondering if the first CS5.5 overcame this flaw (at least in my experience) of bribery when crashing?

  I accept it will sometimes crash, but I want to lose only the work since I last saved or recorded it automatically instead of the project file as a whole.

  Any comment is appreciated.

  I have a Mac Pro 2009 (Nehalem) 3.33 GHz Quad, 16 GB RAM, ATI5870, LG burner Blu - ray 10 x, a $ 50 eSATA card and one card RAID Areca 1880ix-12 hooked to a tower without TR8X digital 8 bays full of Western Digital RE4 2 TB drives. (I just added the RAID Tower recently.)

  I edited a feature film that was shot on the media MXF P2, images of 1080/24 p, 104 minutes length of the final film. For the most part, has been done on Adobe Production Premium CS3. The final product to single-layer BD - R burning.

  I edited four corporate videos paid for Dell, Inc. using the Prod. Premium CS5, shot on the Canon 5 d MkII, Canon 7 d, Nikon D7000, GoProHD and Canon XH - A1 sequences 1080 p all. Finished products burned to BD - R, DVD and export to YouTube and other formats like mpg, mov and mp4.

  I'm just starting another edition of paid feature film, shot on Canon 5 d MkII.

  So far, the only problems I had were of disk space, that is why the new RAID. (Now, I have 10 TB of usable on RAID3 space and a RAID0 internal volume scratch 3 TB using 3x1TB Hitachi/Apple readers, as well as several unique backup disks.) I had a problem trying to export the 104 minute of Blu - ray movie using H.264 first, but I eventually changed export MPEG - 2 Blu - ray and got both faster quality encode speed, and I thought it was because I tried to use too high a bitrate H.264 format.

  Other that that, I had no problem. I found that my 5870 card works better than the GTX 285 / CUDA card for me, because at least half of my work is in After Effects, and the CUDA is worse than the 5870 here. I do not use too many effects in the first of these days, so the GTX285 just sits in a box.

  I use first since 4.2, all variants of Pro, only to skip CS4. I was PC up to CS3, and I'm now Mac only on CS5. I had some crash issues with my PC using the CS and CS2, but I attribute that to the fact that I was on a single core Pentium 4 with only 2 GB (or was it 4?) of the RAM in 2007 or another. (It was also a maxed-out Dell, huh.) In all cases, the only breaks down on the Mac system were encodes failures during this test H - 264 Blu - ray. Never a crash of the OS and never an accident that caused me to lose any work. That says a lot for me. This system is my only source of income, and if she doesn't, I'd be in big trouble.

  I know a lot of people with the same rate of success of Adobe first/AE on PC as well, and they change you 1080 p and RED for live images. I have every confidence in the following Adobe video today, and I don't say this from personal experience. I also bought some FCP X to try this possibility, but so far, I don't like it at all. One of my friends uses exclusively, and the last, I heard she's ok with it, so I'll try to dig deeper when I have free time.

  This is my entry.

• Please provide your comments on my pc version

  http://secure.Newegg.com/Wishlist/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=20771567

  I already have windows 7 home 64 bit and an ocz 600w PSU am I missing something? It's for cs5 and the editing of AVCHD 5dmkii footage so still believed publishing.  Are there good ways to save a few $$ and that the 470 say the video card is still a good idea as a card supported?

  Mr. Eric J wrote:

  OK, I added a block of power, mobo, ram and cpu, please check, I think I can convince my wife that it's ok for $40 to the budget

  http://secure.Newegg.com/Wishlist/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber = 20771567

  This particular configuration seems to me good. But if you want your disks to a RAID parity, I suggest that get rid you of the WD blacks. If you used either individually or in RAID0, they are good readers. If you do not go down the road of RAID, I suggest the Hitachi 7 K 3000 series and to meet the limit of budget, get version 1.5 to $ 65 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822145520). At this price, against Blacks, you could get 4 discs. 4 disks is better 3 then with the body. ;-)

  You have the choice:

  1. Get 4 x 1.5TB Hitachi $65 each (Total $260 for 6 TB), more 3 x 1 TB WD black $90 each (Total $270 for 3 TB). Bonus, the Hitachi would be RAID ready and certified by Areca if you took a map of Areca.
  2. Think long term and get 3 Hitachi swap the power supply to a series of gold Corsair PSU instead. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817139015) you can always add a disc later. And you're going to be uder budget. It is easier and cheaper to add a drive later, and then the boat to change the power supply. The importance of a good diet is crittical. Believe me, treat yourself, get the gold! Lovers, well on paper, everything is just a game of power supply and not designed for the rigorous style worstation stability.

• Advice on which drive hard buy for Raid

  I'm going to buy http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136544 8 these hard drives, and I'll use a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816131004 raid controller to implement RAID 3. Western Digital know that these drives are not suitable for the raid, disk only I can find, is a http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136797. I was wondering if there is a difference actaul between these two that makes the difference. Also, I was wondering if anyone of you knows another hard drive that would be good for the raid which is less than $ 100.

  Your choice of reader and the controller look good for me.

  I have used a controller Areca with WD black for the past two years, and as long as you do not have a form any backup other than redundancy RAID 5 on your PC, you should be OK with the readers of 'consumer' (aka black WD, Hitachi sister, etc.) as opposed to "enterprise" drives for RAID (AKA WE RE3 RE4, Hitachi Ultrastar etc) systems.

  Records of the company are:

  -usually best parts - possibly some companies choose the best boards with defects less for their dearest readers

  -Sometimes a few features that help with vibrations caused by multiple drives in a PC working in tandem

  -almost always a feature that will keep the drive of the company to continue to try to correct any error while reading or writing beyond a certain number of seconds. WD calles this TLER (time limited error recovery);

  I've seen individuals suggesting that setting the spin-up time is increased from the default.7 seconds up to 1 second when you use consumer readers to help prevent consumer drives marked as bad. I did this and I have never had a car abandoned in two years.

  I have about 50% business (RE3 1 TB WD) and about 50% of consumer records (Black 1 TB 32 MB cache) that are very similar, with the exception of the firmware. In two years, I had a bad drive; No data has been lost, performance just the RAID and even that was pretty subtle. And by the way, it was one of the RE3 drives aren't infected, one of consumer readers! When I started with the WD drives, it was possible to download a software and to set the time on consumer drives TLER and gain many of the benefits models company without having to pay for more expensive readers. Then, a year ago WD changed their line WD Black to defeat this utility (it was a utility WD TLER!) to work with their readers of consumers; Yes, their were some upset users on this one!

  Jim

• Should I update my iMac in early 2008 to El Capitan?

  My Mac is older, fairly new sentence for El Capitan, but it still works very well (running OS X Yosemite 10.10.5).)  It has a processor Core Duo clocked at 2.66 GHz and 4 GB of RAM.  I upgraded the HD to a 2 to Hitachi sister a few years ago and I have a 2 TB Seagate external hard drive for my time Machine.  I can't afford to upgrade my Mac any more right now, but I wonder if I should upgrade to El Capitan.  I would appreciate any advice someone who has a similar system specs & knowing El Capitan.

  With all Mac models, 4 GB of RAM is not really enough for El Capitan. At least not if you use to much more than emails and surf the web.

  Our Mac Pro 2008 has 14 GB of RAM installed. El Capitan works smoothly and quickly on it.

• Double screen of Windows 7, second screen works not properly

  I recently spent professional XP to windows 7 Home premium. I had a strange dual screen (ie. a monitor and a TV), with windows 7, I got a new drive hard (Hitachi sister hard 1 TB SATAII 7200 RPM 32 MB Cache - OEM) and installed windows 7, I have no other hardrives installed. the problem is I have a work screen (the main one) and the other is blue all the time, if I move the mouse to the edge it will disappear as if the screen works but do not reappear on the second screen. This could be the cause?

  For any question on Windows 7:

  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/Windows7

  Link above is Windows 7 Forum for questions on Windows 7.

  Windows 7 questions should be directed to the it.

  You are in the Vista Forums.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• 4 TB hard drive windows considered to be 2 TB.

  I bought a hard drive of 4 TB hitachi sister. When I try and initiate the disk in disk managerment, it only recognizes it as a 2 TB HDD. How to solve this problem? I use windows 7. I use GPT instead of MBR as suggested by windows.

  Wednesday, October 3, 2012 21:39:30 + 0000, hngenius wrote:

  I bought a hard drive of 4 TB hitachi sister. When I try and initiate the disk in disk managerment, it only recognizes it as a 2 TB HDD. How to solve this problem? I use windows 7. I use GPT instead of MBR as suggested by windows.

  Presumably, you have support for such large propulsion in the BIOS
  or in storage controller firmware. Read here:
  http://en.community.Dell.com/TechCenter/Extras/w/wiki/2837.aspx

  Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP

• Controller integrated with work RAID1 C drive defined (on Dell) to switch to a different Dell

  Hi - I have a T7500 with a C drive RAID1 array (composed of two drives of 2 TB Hitachi sister) working set in a RAID1 (made with the integrated SATA controller) configuration and I would move intact to another identical T7500.  I tried with another set of disks on another computer Dell Precision game last year and jumped in thinking it was simple from the manual; but, I was wrong, I was forced to break the game and copy one of the disks for a configuration already, Virgin RAID1 set.

  Manual is not so clear. Does anyone know how to do this?  Any help would be appreciated.  Thank you.

  
  

• Studio XPS 9100 drivers

  I plan on finally replace my boot with a Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD drive. I had a great experience with the Samsung 840 250 GB big on my laptop.

  I intend to do a clean install of Win 7 Pro 64 bit.

  The most disturbing aspect is always the drivers: I find the Dell Drivers page very confusing because even when I let the Dell software detects my system, it gives me many more options that I think I need, including multiple versions of the same driver.

  Is there a centralized place where I can only get the drivers I really need?

  The basic specifications are given below.

  DG

  ****

  Dell Studio XPS 9100

  BIOS version: DELL - 20101021

  BIOS date: 21/10/10

  Version of window
  Microsoft Windows 7 Professional 64 bit

  Processor manufacturer:
  Intel Core i7 CPU 930 @ 2.80GHz

  Clock speed: 2.9GHz
  L2 Cache size: 1024

  Memory: 24 GB
  DDR3
  Size 4096 MB X 6
  Crucial Technology manufacturer
  Band bandwidth Max PC3 - 10700H (667 MHz)

  Card network adapter: Microsoft Teredo Tunneling adapter

  Hard drives:
  932GB Western Digital WDC WD1001FAES-75W7A0 (SATA)
  3726GB Hitachi sister (SATA)
  932GB Western Digital WDC WD10EALX-009BA0 (SATA)
  1863GB Western Digital WDC WD2002FAEX-007BA0 (SATA)
  932 GB Maxtor Maxtor OneTouch IEEE 1394 SBP2 device (IEEE1394)

  Optical drives:

  HL-DT-ST BD - RE BH30N
  HL-DT-ST DVD +-RW GH50N

  Graphics cards: ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series 1024 MB

  IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers: Intel ICH10R SATA AHCI Controller

  Monitors:
  Wide screen LCD of HP LP2475w

  Reference Dell 2007FP

  Sound Devices:
  ATI High Definition Audio Device
  Realtek High Definition Audio
  M-Audio MobilePre

  USB controllers

  Intel (r) ICH10 family USB Enhanced Host Controller - 3A3C

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 34

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 35

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 36

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 37

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 38

  Intel (r) ICH10 family - 3 USB universal host controller has 39

  Intel (r) ICH10 family USB Enhanced Host Controller - 3A3A

  That's nice. A little more concise than the Belarc report.

  I am looking to download the XPS 9100 under Win 7-64 and see no chipset driver listed.

  Remove the existing disks, it's you. You won't have too much trouble telling which drive is your configuration.