In Forefront TMG IPSec VPN RVS4000
Hello
We set up a site to site VPN using a Cisco RVS4000 at one end and TMG to another. When initiate us communication (PING) from a client on the local network of TMG, the binding is ESTABLISHED and both directions of traffic flow. However, if we start the communication between the local network of Cisco, the time-out of PINGs and link remains DOWN. For the Cisco VPN log file is locked.
We verified that the IPSec settings at each corresponding end and also tried to update the firmware of 2.0.2.7. Each side of the tunnel of thje uses a public IP with any NAT device between the two.
Ideas or suggestions appreciated.
Ian
I have exactly the same problem
someone at - it solution
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
SA520 and Question IPSec VPN RVS4000
Hello
I installed an IPSec VPN for one of my friends for his company. At its principal office, I installed a Cisco SA520 and he uses to connect devices such as the iPhone and iPad via the IPSec VPN. He uses this fact because he travels abroad a lot and he has problems with services such as Skype is blocked in some countries. This configuration works very well.
It also has a Cisco RVS4000, which he would like to install at his place of business to the Mexico. He would like the RVS4000 VPN configuration to the SA520 in his office. The SA520 in his office has a static IP address. The RVS4000 to the Mexico does not work.
Is it possible to Setup IPSec VPN between a SA520 with a static IP and RVS4000 address that does not have a static IP address? If so, examples of configuration would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
Hi William, simply sign up for a dyndns account or similar service, the RVS4000 configuration will be the same, instead of the IP, you'd be using the dyndns name.
-Tom
Please mark replied messages useful -
Routing access to Internet through an IPSec VPN Tunnel
Hello
I installed a VPN IPSec tunnel for a friend's business. At his desk at home, I installed a Cisco SA520 and at it is remote from the site I have a Cisco RVS4000. The IPSec VPN tunnel works very well. The remote site, it can hit all of its workstations and peripheral. I configured the RVS4000 working in router mode as opposed to the bridge. In the Home Office subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 while the subnet to the remote site is 192.168.2.0/24. The SA520 is configured as Internet gateway for the headquarters to 192.168.1.1. The remote desktop has a gateway 192.168.2.1.
I need to configure the remote site so that all Internet traffic will be routed via the Home Office. I have to make sure that whatever it is plugged into the Ethernet on the RVS4000 port will have its Internet traffic routed through the Internet connection on the SA520. Currently I can ping any device on the headquarters of the remote desktop, but I can't ping anything beyond the gateway (192.168.1.1) in the Home Office.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Hi William, the rvs4000 does not support the tunnel or esp transfer wild-card.
-
Question of WRV210 VPN RVS4000
Hello all,.
I have a client configuration with a WRV210 VPN router wireless home internet (cox cable) and a VPN RVS4000 router at his office (comcast cable internet).
VPN has been in service for about 6 months, with the occasional drop-outs requiring a reboot of the two endpoints to re-establish the VPN.
The WRV210 home recently 'died', requiring a replacement. The client is the swap itself and called for assistance to small businesses (?) where they walked him through the router configuration. Since this morning when I checked, the VPN is connected, but I can't ping between the internal interface on the DESKTOP to the internal interface on the HOUSE.
I'm deleting the entry IPSEC on the RVS4000 (apparently no option to remove an entry on the WRV210!) and the deactivation/creation of new entry on the WRV210.
Any thoughts out there on how to make this diagnosis?
Kind regards
John Knapp
Cisco SMB Select
Hello
I would watch your setting on the tunnel, you can check the LAN IP local and remote do they read X.X.X.0
I would like to know if it is the problem, if it is not remembered the HWC to solve the problem
-
Hello
I just upgraded to macOS Sierra and built-in Cisco IPsec VPN no longer works. When you try to connect, I get a "cannot validate the certificate of the server. "Check your settings and try to reconnect" error message. I use Cisco ASA with self-signed certificates and everything worked fine with previous versions of OS X.
Please help me, I need my VPN Thx a lot
I am having the same problem with StrongSwan and help cert signed with the channel to complete certificates included in the pkcs12 file imported to the keychain. It was working properly in El Capitan, but now broken in the Sierra.
-
Cost of updating the lists of filters for Forefront TMG
Through our MS schools agreement (Volume License), we have purchased a license for Forefront TMG, which is installed and works very well. Would soar, as to clarify cost/licensing of the filtering side of this product different staff members have found different information (some contradictory) on this approval.
The main request is the access to updates for filters (lists updated groups or sites etc.) so that, for example, if block us access to the category of games that list URLS within the category is up to date and will continue to be updated by MRS. Is there any additional cost to do it this way?
Hi Murray has,
I suggest you to see the link below:
http://www.Microsoft.com/forefront/en/us/suite-pricing-licensing.aspx
You can also contact TechNet for more information on Forefront for Microsoft Exchange:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/
-
When I open the forefront TMG management console I had the mistake of Faild refresh 0x004045e
When I open the forefront TMG management console I got the error of Faild refresh 0x004045e, the list of DNS addresses for the sepcified network includes duplicates
the error occurred on the 'avant-garde' of the class object 'server' in the scope of the table 'avant-garde '.
Please help becuse he asks to go downhill, run the script or not and on the two cases, its still to appear
Hi ahmad84
Since you are facing problems with the Forefront TMG management console, it would be better suited in the Technet Windows forum. Please post your question in the following TechNet Windows server forum to improve assistance:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverNIS/threads
-
"Forefront TMG client is not installed properly.
Hello
After you install the Forefront TMG Client, there is an exclamation point on the client and the error "Forefront TMG is not installed correctly" customer.I tried to install the patch 936773, described on the page "http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936773", but it is planned to ISA 2006 and not Forefront TMG.Does anyone have a solution for me?Hello
Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the public on the TechNet site. Please post your question in the below link:
Forefront TMG and ISA Server: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/Forefrontedgegeneral/threads
-
Hi guys,.
Tried to set up an ipsec VPN LAN - LAN between my WRV200 and WRVS4400N my companion. Filled all the relevant config... simple... but still nothing. They don't seem to connect. We are both on ADSL and using IP address by DNS. Routers are in the log file and try to establish the connection. Tried all the setting, both routers are configured the same. STILL NO JOY! Can anyone help, before having to migrate to a netgear or something nasty!
Sorry forgot to mention, using an AM200 modem in Bridge mode. It my router DHCP address direct WAN instead of NAT. The two systems are fixed the same where routers have outside the WAN address. The modem is transparent. I guess that NAT traversal in not required in that State.
-
Hello
First I must admit that I am not very versed in Cisco equipment or in general IPSEC connections so my apologies if I'm doing something really good obviously stupid, but I checked through any kind of things that I could find on the internet on the configuration of IPSEC VPN.
The setup I have is an asa 5520 (o/s 8.2) firewall which, for now, is connected to a temporary connection beautiful style home broadband for testing purposes. The netopia router is configured to allow ipsec passthrough and redirect 62515 UDP, TCP 10000, 4500 UDP, UDP 500 ports in the asa 5520.
I'm trying to connein out of a laptop with disabled windows firewall and vpn cisco 5.0.02.0090 client version.
I ran several attempts through the ipsec configuration wizard options. most of the time that nothing comes in the newspaper to show that a connection was attempted, but there is a way I can set up product options the following on the firewall log:
4. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713903 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry
5: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713902 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, drop table homologous counterpart does not, no match!
6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.
6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.
6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1
6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 302015 | 86.44.x.x | 51905 | 192.168.0.27 | 500 | Built UDP inbound connection 7487 for Internet:86.44.x.x/51905 (86.44.x.x/51905) at identity:192.168.0.27/500 (192.168.0.27/500)
and this, in the journal of customer:
Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.02.0090
Copyright (C) 1998-2007 Cisco Systems, Inc.. All rights reserved.
Customer type: Windows, Windows NT
Running: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3
24 13:54:08.250 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100002
Start the login process
25 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100004
Establish a secure connection
26 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100024
Attempt to connect with the server "213.94.x.x".
27 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 IKE/0x6300003B
Attempts to establish a connection with 213.94.x.x.
28 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NO, ID, VID (Xauth), VID (dpd), VID (Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID (Unity)) at 213.94.x.x
29 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700008
IPSec driver started successfully
30 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys
31 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021
Retransmit the last package!
32 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x
33 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021
Retransmit the last package!
34 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x
35 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021
Retransmit the last package!
36 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x
37 13:54:28.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000017
Marking of IKE SA delete (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING
38 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0x6300004B
IKE negotiation to throw HIS (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING
39 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100014
Could not establish the Phase 1 SA with the server '213.94.x.x' due to the 'DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING '.
40 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/5 CM / 0 x 63100025
Initializing CVPNDrv
41 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100046
Set indicator established tunnel to register to 0.
42 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001
Signal received IKE to complete the VPN connection
43 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys
44 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys
45 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014
Remove all keys
46 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A
IPSec driver successfully stopped
I have connectivity full http from the internet to a machine inside the asa 5520 so I think that the static routing and NAT'ing should be ok, but I am pleased to provide you with all the details.
Can you see what I'm doing wrong?
Thank you
Sam
Pls add the following policy:
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
preshared authentication
the Encryption
md5 hash
Group 2
You can also run debug on the ASA:
debugging cry isa
debugging ipsec cry
and retrieve debug output after trying to connect.
-
IPSec vpn - no selected proposal
Hello:
I am facing a problem in the configuration of the ipsec vpn on my 7200 router. It's a site to customer topology as shown below.
The request from my pc, R2' isa crypto log:
R2 #debug crypto isakmp
Crypto ISAKMP debug is on
R2 #.
R2 #.
R2 #.
* 22:41:59.871 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet dport 500 sport 500 SA NEW Global (N)
* 22:41:59.879 6 April: ISAKMP: created a struct peer 66.66.66.52, peer port 500
* 22:41:59.879 6 April: ISAKMP: new created position = 0x67E98D84 peer_handle = 0 x 80000002
* 22:41:59.883 6 April: ISAKMP: lock struct 0x67E98D84, refcount 1 to peer crypto_isakmp_process_block
* 22:41:59.887 6 April: ISAKMP: 500 local port, remote port 500
* 22:41:59.891 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): insert his with his 67E5DCD8 = success
* 22:41:59.911 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
* 22:41:59.911 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_READY = IKE_R_MM1* 6 April 22:41:59.931: ISAKMP: (0): treatment ITS payload. Message ID = 0
* 6 April 22:41:59.935: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.939: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
* 6 April 22:41:59.939: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.943: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
* 22:41:59.947 6 April: ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
* 6 April 22:41:59.947: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.951: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
* 6 April 22:41:59.955: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
* 6 April 22:41:59.959: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.959: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
* 6 April 22:41:59.963: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.967: ISAKM
R2 #P: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 241
* 6 April 22:41:59.971: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.971: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 184
* 6 April 22:41:59.975: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:41:59.979: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 134
* 22:41:59.983 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): pair found pre-shared key matching 66.66.66.52
* 6 April 22:41:59.987: ISAKMP: (0): pre-shared key local found
* 22:41:59.987 6 April: ISAKMP: analysis of the profiles for xauth...
* 22:41:59.991 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 1 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:41:59.995 6 April: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:41:59.995 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 256
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: unknown group of DH 20
* 22:41:59.999 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.003 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.003 6 April: ISAKMP:
R2 # life expectancy (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 2 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 128
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group unknown 19
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 3 against the policy of priority 10
R2 #r 6 22:42:00.011: ISAKMP: AES - CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: keylength 256
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group 14 unknown
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): free encryption algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform 4 against the policy of priority 10
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: Diffie-Hellman group 14 unknown
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): offered hash algorithm is
R2 # does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 3
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): audit ISAKMP transform against the policy of priority 10 5
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: 3DES-CBC encryption
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: SHA hash
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: group by default 2
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: pre-shared key auth
* 22:42:00.011 6 April: ISAKMP: type of life in seconds
* 22:42:00.015 6 April: ISAKMP: life (IPV) 0 x 0 0 x 0 0 x 70 0x80
* 22:42:00.019 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): offered hash algorithm does not match policy.
* 22:42:00.023 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): atts are not acceptable. Next payload is 0
* 22:42:00.023 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): no offer is accepted!
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): phase 1 SA policy is not acceptable! (local 180.180.0.130 remote 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.027 6 April: ISAKMP (0): increment the count of errors on his, try 1 of 5: construct_fail_ag_init
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): has no
R2 #construct AG information message.
* 6 April 22:42:00.027: ISAKMP: (0): lot of 66.66.66.52 sending my_port 500 peer_port 500 (R) MM_NO_STATE
* 22:42:00.027 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
* 22:42:00.031 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): the peer is not paranoid KeepAlive.* 22:42:00.035 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason HIS State "Policy of ITS phase 1 not accepted" (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52)
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): IKE frag vendor processing id payload
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 123
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v2
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0)
R2 #: load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 194
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 241
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 184
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): load useful vendor id of treatment
* 6 April 22:42:00.039: ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 134
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP (0): action of WSF returned the error: 2
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
* 22:42:00.039 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1* 22:42:00.059 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of reason HIS State "Policy of ITS phase 1 not accepted" (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.059 6 April: ISAKMP: unlock counterpart struct 0x67E98D84 for isadb_m
R2 #ark_sa_deleted (), count 0
* 22:42:00.067 6 April: ISAKMP: delete peer node by peer_reap for 66.66.66.52: 67E98D84
* 22:42:00.071 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_DEL
* 22:42:00.075 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_DEST_SA* 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): removal of HIS right State 'No reason' (R) MM_NO_STATE (post 66.66.66.52)
* 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_ERROR
* 22:42:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_DEST_SA = IKE_DEST_SA* 22:42:00.895 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet 500 Global 500 (R) sport dport MM_NO_STATE
* 22:42:02.911 6 April: ISAKMP (0): received 66.66.66.52 packet 500 Global 500 (R) sport dport MM_NO_STATE
R2 #.
* 22:43:00.087 6 April: ISAKMP: (0): serving SA., his is 67E5DCD8, delme is 67E5DCD8
R2 #.And when I capture on my pc, I got:
I don't know why, waiting for you helps nicely, thank you very much!
I think that what is wrong is your combination of your group of encryption, hashing and dh, try changing your sha instead of md5 hash table.
-
Is availble for IPsec VPN FOS 6.3 support stateful failover
Is availble for IPsec VPN FOS 6.3 support stateful failover
SAJ
Hello Saj,
Unfortunately not... stateful failover replica information such as:
Table of connection TCP, udp xlate table ports, h.323, PAT port allocation table...
they replicate data such as:
user authentication (uauth) table
Table ISAKMP / IPSEC SA
ARP table
Routing information
Therefore, in the case where the main breaks down, the IPSEC vpn will be reformed for the failover... Meanwhile, the user will not be able to access the applications...
I hope this helps... all the best... the rate of responses if deemed useful...
REDA
-
ISA500 site by site ipsec VPN with Cisco IGR
Hello
I tried a VPN site by site work with Openswan and Cisco 2821 router configuration an Ipsec tunnel to site by site with Cisco 2821 and ISA550.
But without success.
my config for openswan, just FYI, maybe not importand for this problem
installation of config
protostack = netkey
nat_traversal = yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%4:!$RIGHT_SUBNET
nhelpers = 0
Conn rz1
IKEv2 = no
type = tunnel
left = % all
leftsubnet=192.168.5.0/24
right =.
rightsourceip = 192.168.1.2
rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24
Keylife 28800 = s
ikelifetime 28800 = s
keyingtries = 3
AUTH = esp
ESP = aes128-sha1
KeyExchange = ike
authby secret =
start = auto
IKE = aes128-sha1; modp1536
dpdaction = redΘmarrer
dpddelay = 30
dpdtimeout = 60
PFS = No.
aggrmode = no
Config Cisco 2821 for dynamic dialin:
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA aes
sha hash
preshared authentication
Group 5
lifetime 28800
!
card crypto CMAP_1 1-isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP_1
!
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA1 esp - aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP_1 1
game of transformation-ESP-AES-SHA1
match address 102
!
ISAKMP crypto key
address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ISAKMP crypto keepalive 30 periodicals
!
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.4002
card crypto CMAP_1
!
I tried ISA550 a config with the same constelations, but without suggesting.
Anyone has the same problem?
And had anyone has a tip for me, or has someone expirense with a site-by-site with ISA550 and Cisco 2821 ipsec tunnel?
I can successfully establish a tunnel between openswan linux server and the isa550.
Patrick,
as you can see on newspapers, the software behind ISA is also OpenSWAN
I have a facility with a 892 SRI running which should be the same as your 29erxx.
Use your IOS Config dynmap, penny, you are on the average nomad. If you don't have any RW customer you shoul go on IOS "No.-xauth" after the isakmp encryption key.
Here is my setup, with roardwarrior AND 2, site 2 site.
session of crypto consignment
logging crypto ezvpn
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 2
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 3
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 4
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 5
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
life 7200
ISAKMP crypto address XXXX XXXXX No.-xauth key
XXXX XXXX No.-xauth address isakmp encryption key
!
ISAKMP crypto client configuration group by default
key XXXX
DNS XXXX
default pool
ACL easyvpn_client_routes
PFS
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac FEAT
!
dynamic-map crypto VPN 20
game of transformation-FEAT
market arriere-route
!
!
card crypto client VPN authentication list by default
card crypto VPN isakmp authorization list by default
crypto map VPN client configuration address respond
10 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map
Description of VPN - 1
defined peer XXX
game of transformation-FEAT
match the address internal_networks_ipsec
11 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map
VPN-2 description
defined peer XXX
game of transformation-FEAT
PFS group2 Set
match the address internal_networks_ipsec2
card crypto 20-isakmp dynamic VPN ipsec VPN
!
!
Michael
Please note all useful posts
-
Problem with IPSec VPN ISA500 &; login questions (multiple devices)
I have a Cisco ISA500, we use for connection with IPSEC VPN of some products apple (MacBook Pro and iPad). We can operate randomly once in a while, but it fails most of the time of negotiation. Someone at - it suggestions on what I can do to make this work?
I did test it on my Linux machine and it does not when I had configured default settings. I had to change the NAT Traversal for UDP CISCO on the Linux machine for the connection to work.
14/04/03 20:54:13 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:54:13 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_AGGR_R1. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:30 - warning - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: quick mode attempt fails, please check if IKE/transformation/PFS local are the same as remote site; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:30 - warning - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_AGGR_R1. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: STATE_AGGR_R1: sent AR1, expected AI2.; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [48] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #59: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: regardless of the payload of unknown Vendor ID [16f6ca16e4a4066d83821a0f0aeaa862]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] Vendor ID = 107, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] Vendor ID = 106, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] Vendor ID = 108, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received Vendor ID value = 109 payload [RFC 3947] method; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:53:03 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:43810 package: received vendor ID payload [XAUTH]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: STATE_AGGR_R1: sent AR1, expected AI2.; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = 'groupname' [47] XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX #58: attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH not preceded by the OAKLEY_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM attribute. Attribute OAKLEY_KEY_LENGTH. (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: regardless of the payload of unknown Vendor ID [16f6ca16e4a4066d83821a0f0aeaa862]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] Vendor ID = 107, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] Vendor ID = 106, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received meth payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] Vendor ID = 108, but already using method 109; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received Vendor ID value = 109 payload [RFC 3947] method; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity]; (pluto)
2014-04-03 20:52:20 - WARNING - IPsec VPN: msg = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:58320 package: received vendor ID payload [XAUTH]; (pluto)Hi rich,
What version of firmware you used before upgrade? You upgrade to 1.2.19 and now this works?
Thank you
Brandon
-
Router Cisco 1941 - crypto isakmp policy command missing - IPSEC VPN
Hi all
I was looking around and I can't find the command 'crypto isakmp policy' on this router Cisco 1941. I wanted to just a regular Lan IPSEC to surprise and Lan installation tunnel, the command isn't here. Have I not IOS bad? I thought that a picture of K9 would do the trick.
Any suggestions are appreciated
That's what I get:
Router (config) #crypto?
CA Certification Authority
main activities key long-term
public key PKI componentsSEE THE WORM
Cisco IOS software, software C1900 (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Updated Thursday, March 10, 10 22:27 by prod_rel_teamROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0 M6 (1r), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
The availability of router is 52 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 02:43:40 UTC Thursday, April 21, 2011
System image file is "flash0:c1900 - universalk9-mz.» Spa. 150 - 1.M2.bin.
Last reload type: normal charging
Reload last reason: reload commandThis product contains cryptographic features...
Cisco CISCO1941/K9 (revision 1.0) with 487424K / 36864K bytes of memory.
Card processor ID FTX142281F4
2 gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2 interfaces Serial (sync/async)
Configuration of DRAM is 64 bits wide with disabled parity.
255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
254464K bytes of system CompactFlash ATA 0 (read/write)License info:
License IDU:
-------------------------------------------------
Device SN # PID
-------------------------------------------------
* 0 FTX142281F4 CISCO1941/K9Technology for the Module package license information: "c1900".
----------------------------------------------------------------
Technology-technology-package technology
Course Type next reboot
-----------------------------------------------------------------
IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent
security, none none none
given none none noneConfiguration register is 0 x 2102
You need get the license of security feature to configure the IPSec VPN.
Currently, you have 'none' for the security feature:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Technology-technology-package technology
Course Type next reboot
-----------------------------------------------------------------
IPBase ipbasek9 ipbasek9 Permanent
security, none none none
given none none noneHere is the information about the licenses on router 1900 series:
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why is there a circle in the center of the browser window?
Hello Sometimes when you browse the web, Firefox displays a circle cross - like in the middle of the screen. This just started a few weeks ago. I could not find any information about it. It seems to happen when I type in the fields of form like this.
-
Portege R700-1CZ - cannot use the latest driver of fingerprints
My fingerprints camera worked fine until I updated the drivers yesterday to the latest version. I mainly use it to login in and encryption of files, but now I n t get this option. I uninstalled and installed again, tried reinstalling the software but
-
Problem with the registratyion extension and guarantee of Satelite A300-1MT
Hello guys,. I am trying to record a new Toshiba Satellite A300-1MT I bought recently.I filled out the required fields, but when I click on NEXT, I am asked to enter a "" contract number".How can I find this number? Thanks in advance!
-
Hi, just want to let someone know that when in the forums Windows Vista here, as the links above show that we are in the forums of windows 7. It shows answers > forums Home > forums windows 7 > windows update The path is not displayed properly and ju
-
Chkdsk Disk Defragmenter error.
Try to run disk defragmentation, when I hit Analyze or Defragmenter, I get an error window that says: "Disk Defragmenter has detected that Chkdsk is scheduled to run on the volume (c). Please run Chkdsk /f."I ran the Chkdsk program, restarted, but st