ISA-570W behind router 1921

Similar Questions

• Termination of VPN on Pix behind router IOS with private subnet

  OK, basically, I wonder if it is possible to terminate a VPN connection on a Pix 506 Firewall which is behind a router IOS. The public interface of the Pix 506 have a private on a 29 ip address will IOS within the interface. Network is configured as follows:

  Internet as 10Base T

  | (5 public - X.X.X.34. 38)

  | (In WIC-1ENET)

  | (.34 assigned to interface)

  Cisco 1760

  | (Pomp) | (WIC-4PORTSWITCH)

  | | (10.0.0.1 29 on 1760)

  Net private Pix 506

  (192.168.1.0) (10.0.0.2 29 on Pix)

  Now, two internal interfaces of the 1760 are configured to PAT on the IP of the interface of the 1760 and all internet traffic goes perfectly. None of the access lists are currently applied anywhere on the 1760 and a static translation on the 1760 is configured pour.35 to 10.0.0.2 ('public' ip pix). RDP and other services authorized in the pix access list work perfectly well from the outside world when you enter a.35, but if I try to terminate a VPN from a pix 501 for the pix 506 offsite using the Intellectuelle.35 property, it does not work.

  Is it possible to do this type of work setting.

  I realize I could put an external switch to 1760 and run the public subnet directly and individually in the 1760 and Pix 506, however, I really would prefer not no need to do so if it is possible to avoid it.

  Remove the crypto map to the interface on the PIX and reapply.

• The managed behind router switch remote access?

  What is the best way to access remotely to a switch behind a router?  I will use a switch SF300, and there is no server.

  For points of access (PA) behind a router, I give each a diffferent LAN address and port number.  In router I have forward TCP traffic with the single port/LAN IP.  Then using the port numbers with the address of the static router, the browser can remote access to the router or the attached AP.  But where do I put the managed switch LAN port number?  Assume default is port 80 and I would change to 8001 to switch #1; 8002 to switch #2; etc.  Could not find this info in the manual of configurtion.

  Hello

  At this point, I would recommend a call to the Cisco Small Business Centre at 1-866-606-1866 support so that action can be taken and your configuration can be reviewed.

  I have reproduced the concern here and I am able to remotely manage my switch SF300 with an RV082 as the router.

  My rule in the RV082 are as follows:

  Creating a custom topic UPnP service.  Create SF300 application name (it is a basic text field and can be any name), 8001 an external port and internal port 80.  I send to the address IP internal SF300 switch and click the check box.  From there on, I select Add to the list.  Once it appears in my list, I then click Save settings at the bottom of the page.

  Thank you!

  Dave

• VPN to ASA behind router

  Hello

  I have ASA 5505 behind a router, which is also a dmvpn (the router), on my ASA RADIUS I configured a remote access vpn.

  But when I try to forward the VPN ports to my asa, I get problems with stability, with my talk about vpn on the router.

  Is it possible to have a dmvpn to the router and vpn for remote access to my ASA?

  I have attached the running configuration.

  Thank you

  Joelle,

  The problem here is that your router and the ASA want to use udp port 500 and udp port 4500.  Of course if you forward incoming ports then the dmvpn is not going to work and vice versa.  What you can try to have your ezvpn use ipsec-over-tcp on port 10000 and that transmits to the place.

  On the SAA configure "crypto isakmp ipsec-over-tcp port 10000.

  On the change of the client connection information, click the transport tab and select ipsec-over-tcp.

  On the router port forward tcp 10000 to the ASA.

  Hope that helps.

  -Jay

• Cisco router 1921 internet problem with a site-to-site vpn connection

  I have TE-data Modem 3com dsl connection in 2 sites. and I have 2 routers cisco 1921 and there is a vpn site-to-site between them and

  the VPN connection works well. and I configured the PAT on one of them to allow users access to the internet but tere is a problem:

  all users can ping a public ip address

  all users can ping any URL

  but there is no navigation of the internet

  and it's configuration

  NOZHA #sh run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 2425 bytes
  !
  ! Last configuration change at 11:24:08 UTC Thu Sep 20 2012
  !
  version 15.0
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  no password encryption service
  !
  hostname NOZHA
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  enable secret 5
  !
  No aaa new-model
  !
  !
  !
  !
  No ipv6 cef
  IP source-route
  IP cef
  !
  !
  !
  IP dhcp pool 1
  network 192.168.40.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 192.168.40.1
  4.2.2.2 DNS Server 8.8.8.8
  Infinite rental
  !
  !
  IP domain name shady2012
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FCZ1432C5KM
  licence start-up module c1900 technology-package securityk9
  !
  !
  !
  redundancy
  !
  !
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key shady2012 address 81.10.xxx.yy
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set shady2012 aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  card crypto 150 s2s - VPN ipsec-isakmp
  the value of 81.10.xxx.yy peer
  PFS group2 Set
  match address s2s-vpn-Oly
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  MTU 1000
  IP address 41.41.xx.yy 255.255.255.252
  NAT outside IP
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  s2s - VPN crypto card
  !
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  192.168.40.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  activate nat IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  !
  default IP gateway (hop 41.41.xx.yy) next
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  !
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  !
  The dns server IP
  overload of the IP nat source list mypool GigabitEthernet0/0 interface
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.41.xx.yy
  IP route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 (41.41.xx.yy) next hop
  IP route 192.168.30.0 255.255.255.0 (41.41.xx.yy) next hop
  !
  mypool extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  allow an ip
  s2s-vpn-Oly extended IP access list
  ip permit 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.21.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.30.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255
  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.21.0 0.0.0.255
  ip permit 192.168.40.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.21.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  line to 0
  line vty 0 4
  password
  opening of session
  !
  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
  end

  If anyone has the answer please answer ASAP

  When you say can ping any URL, I am assuming that you are pinging of the FULL domain name, IE: it is resolved to an ip address, right?

  If you disable the VPN, can you access the internet?

  You have a proxy server or anything that could block navigation?

  This error message you get on your web browser?

  Also try another web browser, and none works?

• L2l AAS behind router

  Can an ASA initiate a VPN L2L on NAT - T behind a router?

  The VPN can be established successfully, when our third party start the connection, but not when we leave it to our end.

  Many providers do not support this scenario, I would like to know if Cisco do.

  Yes it will work. The SAA can be behind a NAT as an originater IPSec as an IPSec responder. Of course As NAT is configured correctly if the ASA's answering machine.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

• VPN problem - "C1712 behind router Linksys ' connection to PIX515e

  Hi all

  I have a question about VPN (lan-to-lan).

  My setup is the following:

  10.1.20.x-[PIX515e_central site VPN concetrator]-(( ISP ))-[LINKSYS BEFSX41 router]-[Cisco1712_branch] - 192.168.14.x

  I would like to create tunnel VPN between C1712 and PIX515 (lan-to-lan), so users of 192.168.14.x would be able to connect to servers located on a central site in network 10.1.20.x.

  NAT - T is manually enabled on PIX and 'IPsec passtrough' is enabled on the Linksys router. Then what should I do now to create a VPN tunnel?

  What is the basic C1712 and PIX515e configuration to make it work?

  All other industries (8) work, but they are directly connected to the internet via C1712, so without router Linksys in front of him. Thus, PIX is already properly configured for this configuration.

  I guess that the installer with Linksys router does not work because of PAT.

  6.3 (4) version PIX

  C1712 Version 12.4

  Please advise!

  Thank you very much in advance!

  This line is incorrect on the router configuration:

  IP nat inside source list 6 interface FastEthernet0 overload

  Please, remove it and have her take:

  overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface FastEthernet0

  Hope that solves this problem.

• Standard Gmail view does not work behind the router WRT110

  

  PIC - full view

  I use the gmail webmail site.

  Behind router wrt110 and in standard gmail view, I can't read my emails

  because the site stops loading in.

  The problem only occurs in the browser Firefox 3.5.7.

  In Internet Explorer 8, everything seems fine.

  Help, pls.

  Problem solved.

  NoScript Firefox addon was guilty.

  It automatically blocks goole.com scripts.

  After the activation of google in noscript standard display GMail works again.

• Router dual-band only invited E3200 access works

  Hello, I am looking for help on my router.  Today my main band has stopped working and I can not connect.  I tried to change the password and am still unable to connect, and can't even get an option to enter the new password to other devices, even if the signal is recognized.  My guest access works very well.  Can anyone help?

  Yes, the router behind router can be a bit confusing, but I think you're in luck because the E3200 supports bridge mode.

  Simply follow the instructions to configure your E3200 in Bridge mode.

  http://www6.nohold.NET/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=28cee6a2fb0d4176a2210942d1d5836c_Setting_up_the _...

  The alternative if you want to use your E3200 as the main router is to set your modem in Bridge mode, if it is able.

• Very strange Vista problem when behind a switch

  I bought the router WRT610N along a LINKSYS EG008W 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Workgroup Switch. In my small office (4 closed offices and an area central + kitchen + room + storage + a bowl of chocolate for my pregnant wife), we were using our ISP (Bell) modem/router (Wi - Fi + 4 ports RJ-45) with switch 8 old ports. There are 3 Mackintosh a XP and a Vista workstations and a D - Link DNS-323 NAS on the local network, + XP/Vista/Mac laptop wireless now and then. I wanted to update our stuff for a flow rate of localized Gigabyte (still looking autour to build a Xeon server + file server), with Wireless N Dual-Band, and the following configuration has worked right away without installing anything same software-wise, nor the need to reset - restart a computer or device: all records shared Internet connection was available immediately which was very satisfying. I even bought Cisco Network Magic Pro 5.5 and I'm glad I did, this is a really well done and intuitive graphic interface to manage small business networks (one license for PC stations up to 8 + 8 Mac stations), if not the best out there for its target market niche and prices vary.

  However, there is a confused about Vista glitch: I have to fix directly on one of the ports on the WRT610N, it won't work if I try behind a switch box (although it works for all other operating systems), using the following network configuration:

  1. all the workstations are connected to the switch, focused on one of the ports of WRT610N
  2. The Internet WRT610N port Bell's DSL modem
  3. SIN D - Link DNS - 323 and the port 3 WRT610N
  4. EG008W Switch 4 port WRT610N 1 port
  5. Workstation to the switch EG008W 2 Vista port
  6. Workstation XP and switch EG008W 3 port
  7. Workstations Mac to switch EG008W ports 1, 5, and 6

  From the XP desktop, I see Macs and access the NAS. From a Mac, I can see + access the XP and the NAS. Vista station connects any behind the switch EG008W: I * must * plug into the router, WRT610N, something I don't want to because the switch is there to serve as a wall mounted RJ45 plugs into each office (where the Mac XP and Vista workstations are located)... Any help or link to a relevant reference would be greatly appreciated.

  Kevj, thanks for answer you, I came here to close the topic because I put the finger on the problem and it is resolved: the problem lies elsewhere, it is not the calbling or some other hardware problem. I have replace the Vista box by a mobile XP, using the same wiring right and everything worked well, he wasn't a wiring problem... Note that the workstation is a Dell Studio which comes with a Realteck Gigabit controller box (so I guess that many other models/brands also provide this same controller, which means that many other users can know this problem).

  Here's what I did:

  • I got rid of Vista by installing Windows 7 and everything worked fine!
  • I then published an update of Windows from the Microsoft site, which offered a patch for the familly Realteck GBE (among other patches) controller
  • After restarting the computer, the network was not accessible more while the Win7 box is behind the Swithcher: it behaved exactly as when it was Vista (indicating that the adapter was unplugged when behind the selector and then giving access while behind router WRT)!
  • So I restored the last just restore point prior to the update of the controller and got everything back to normal; I then did another session of MS Windows Update without the Realteck driver patch, and everything worked well.

  Conclusion: DO NOT update your controller driver Realteck GBE from Microsoft, whether for Vista or Windows 7, it has a bug which takes place whenever your Vista/Win7 box is behind a DMZ sub-segment of LAN using a blender (switch-router-router/DSL-ISP).

  Note: the WRT610N works like a charm! It is plugged with a RAID0 of DNS-323 1 TB NAS, one 8-port Gigabit switch power supply 3 macs, 1 XP and 1 Windows 7, Wi - FI works well enough (G mode, while the band n is open - I don't have a camera of 5 GHz yet so I can't say for this FREQUENCY range) and I left the own DSL access available Point. Which means that there are 3 Access Points: one directly on the DSL router that leaves the LAN in a DMZ (cannot be seen or accessed from the mobile) and 2 more on the WRT610N dual band access not only to the Internet but also for shared resources). Blue color for the port connected to the dwitcher, which means a Gigabit local LAN, and green port for the DNS-323 whitch works to 100 MB (unfortunately they still do not have a Gigabit NAS). I am very happy with the product, more when combined with Network Magic Pro.

• Forward traffic IPSec VPN

  Hi dude, I want to address this topic to understand ipsec VPN throughput.
  I have 1 router 1921 and 1 ASA 5510 behind the router. I want to set up remote access on ASA firewall by traffic shaping router forwards (port UDP 500 and UDP 4500 port). I have 1 public IP address and I already configure NAT on the router. In fact, I heard that IPsec cannot pass through the NAT. So if I want to configure VPN on SAA, it is possible to do? All the guys comment on and propose your idea to me. Thanks for your reply.

  Hello

  When you say, you have a public IP address. Is this address IP is assigned to the interface of the router or not attributed distinct IP address.

  If its not assigned public IP address, you can make static NAT with ASA outside the IP address to a public IP address on your router as below

  {100.100.x.x}fa0/0<-(R1)->fa0/1{192.168.100.1}<------->{192.168.100.2}eth0/0(ASA)eth0/1{172.16.01}

  IP nat inside source 192.168.100.2 static 100.100.x.x

  This way you have full IP to IP NAT.

  If you got the only IP address that is assigned to the interface of the router then you will need to nat as port said

  For VPN gateways running versions of the Cisco IOS software prior to version 12.2 (13) T, the functionality of IPSec passthrough is required on the router that runs PAT to enable payload ESP (Encapsulating Security) through.

  Note: This feature is called IPSec through NAT (NAT) network support Advisory software (registered only customers).

  In order to initiate the tunnel of the local counterpart (PATed), no configuration is necessary. In order to initiate the tunnel of the remote peer, these commands are needed:

  • IP nat inside source static esp inside_ip interface, interface

  • IP nat inside source udp static inside_ip 500 interface interface 500

  For VPN gateways that run a version of the Cisco IOS software later than 12.2 (13) T, IPSec traffic is encapsulated in data protocol packets UDP (User) port 4500. This feature is called IPSec NAT transparency . In order to initiate the tunnel of the local counterpart (PATed), no configuration is necessary.

  In order to initiate the tunnel of the remote peer, these commands are needed:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-VPN/IPSec-negotiation-IKE-protocols/23820-iOS-Pat-IPSec-tunnel.html

  • IP nat inside source udp static inside_ip 4500 4500 interface interface

  • IP nat inside source udp static inside_ip 500 interface interface 500

  HTH

  Sandy

• Lor on wrt1900ac flow?

  Recently, I have raised a ticket with my ISP to tell don't reach is not my bamdwith contraxt. I have 120 MB of up and down. On speed tests I have abt 55 scope consistentluly to the top and 150 down. It seems that my wrt1900ac is the culprit:
  -all tests must be carried out by cat6 cable
  -a test when it is connected directly to the modem/vocations ISPs give you 150 upstairs and downstairs
  -If I put my pc behind my linksys (which is the router behind router of the Internet service provider), I get aforentioned low download
  -copy of files in my local network (nas to pc) gives 700 MB
  -all switches are linksys gigabit switches

  What's happening here? Is it normal that my traffic loses speed so just browsing through my router side wan side lan?

  Enable the prioritization of media and configure it correctly:
  Activate the Support WMM
  The maximum value that your ISP provides you with the value Downstream\Bandwidth. # x 1024 = # value to enter the area downstream.
  http://www.Linksys.com/us/support-article?articleNum=138353
  http://www.Linksys.com/us/support-article?articleNum=156271

• Subnetting RV042

  Hello

  I'm trying to implement a subnet 2 with two routers RV042. A router will act as a bridge and the two WAN ports will be used by two different isp connection. The first router (gateway) IP LAN will be 192.168.0.1/24.

  I also want to set up another router behind router modem with different subnet 192.168.1.X/24. And I would that the customers of the 192.168.1.x subnet that you want to use the internet through the gateway router and the 192.168.0.x subnet clients to access resources on the 192.168.1.x subnet. I am able to do it with two RV042?

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  Thank you!

• WiFi WPA2 Enterprise with RADIUS - connection problem

  Hello

  I have here a new ISA 570w with the latest firmware (1.2.17).

  Anyway, I can't get wifi to work in mode WPA2 Enterprise with RADIUS authentication.

  Mode WPA2 PSK are not a problem.

  I have configured the BEAM properly and I can connect directly to him via NTRadPing without any problem. Also the test in the web interface works without any problem (see Figure 2, 3).

  The RADIUS server is a server Synology RADIUS on a Synology NAS, which is a FreeRADIUS server under the hood.

  In the settings of the ISA wireless, I put this RADIUS server for authentication (see screenshot 1, 4).

  However, I can not connect to connect to the network:

  On the iPhone (iOS 6.1.3) I get a prompt for a user name and password, but when I click on connect, it says 'connect to 'cisco3'... ". "and stays there.

  In ISA 570w newspaper, he said:

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = add MAC station in the list of the ATU. VID = 5; MAC = 5 C: 59:48:02:78:3E;

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = Wireless mode is a 802.11 mixed b_g_n

  When I cancel the connection attempt, he said:

  Information

  Wireless

  MSG = the Client has dissociated;

  On my Thinkpad with Windows 7 Professional I have everything configured as usual (see screenshots 5,6,7,8) but when I try to connect I do not get a command prompt where I wonder username and password, and finally the connection cannot be established (see Figure 9). Also tried with the same configuration on an another Windows 7 Pro installed costs for laptop with the same problem.

  I can't see any attempt of 570w ISA to authenticate anything in the logs of the RADIUS.

  Also the capture of network traffic on the LAN to the Synology NAS port does not show the RADIUS datagrams.

  I already disabled COP because I read that it can cause problems, but it did not help.

  Can you please suggest something else I can try?

  Thanks in advance!

  Kind regards

  Dominik

  I saw these screenshots, but that screen settings just select the button set up next to the authentication method in the section user authentication, under users.  In each of your screenshots, the RADIUS server identification number is 1, so I would also ensure that I configured the server ID RADIUS 1 that can be configured by going to users-> RADIUS servers.

  All that said, I have seen that your tests have passed and I also do not understand the point of having the RADIUS settings on other screens and then to have info ID RADIUS.  My thought is that you'd be able to pre-set RADIUS users of-> screen RADIUS servers and then select the RADIUS server ID in all other screens without having to enter the RADIUS news over and over again.  He also thinks that you could ignore the users-> screen RADIUS server and enter RADIUS information over and over again and it should work... as you set up initially.  However, based on the past experience of programming errors, I recommend configuring the ID from RADIUS server 1 under user-> RADIUS servers if you have not already... just in case where.

  Shawn Eftink
  CCNA/CCDA

  Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

• Loopback Interface client endpoint VPN Site

  My project consists of 871 router connected to the router soho 3845 network head on the MPLS network unencrypted for data communication. For the Client PC behind router 871 on remote site, they need activate the Cisco VPN client and connect to headend 3845 so that they can access information behind the main switch 6506.

  To reduce to a minimum the installation, I would like to prepare a unique VPN profile for all remote controls. So, I plan on using lo0 int for the VPN endpoint. However, I have found that when the VPN connection is in place on the int lo0, the remote client computer can 'ping' lo0 only, but can not 'ping' all other IP addresses. However, when I set up the connection to the IP address on router 3845, the connection is ok.

  I have attached my config for the VPN and the diagram. Can anyone help?

  Hello

  You need to change your ACL split tunnel:

  FEHD_VPN extended IP access list

  Note * outbound VPN client traffic *.

  IP 10.0.0.0 allow 0.255.255.255 10.65.215.0 0.0.0.255

  Note: Do not know what is the purpose of "allowed host ip host 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.