Multiple connection BEFSR41 problems

Similar Questions

• Multiple connections to Microsoft sites

  I have multiple connections to microsoft sites on how to get online. I got (at the time) and I did not open my browser yet! I'd like to know why, and what function they serve. Thank you

  192.88.99.1

  207.46.75.254

  65.55.37.62

  64.4.59.173

  213.199.161.77

  65.55.53.156

  newncsi.glbdns.Microsft.com

  Hello
   
  1. what browser do you use to go online?
  2. don't you make changes before the show?
  3. where exactly do you see these connections?
   
  This can happen if you have set as the web browser home page www.microsoft.com . Whenever the browser is trying to connect to the Microsoft server, you will see a large number of established connections. But in the description of the problem, you mentioned that you see these connections when the web browser is not open. This leads to some confusion. We appreciate if you can provide us with more details on the issue, so that we can better help you.
   
  Kind regards
  Syed
  Answers from Microsoft supports the engineer.

• Slow performance when multiple connected clients, WSM 6.0 x 64

  Slow performance when multiple connected clients, WSM 6.0 x 64

  Hello

  When users logs on, its quick and pleasant.

  However, when many connects, it slows down everything.

  The linked site server has basic 16 total, 24 GB of RAM, and 8 x 300 GB 10 k in RAID10 discs.

  I see the server is loading rather low, he got 4 x 1 Gbit/s in the lacp to a switch of concert team, then all switches have 1gig uplink.

  The server use never more than about 10 GB of RAM, this could be the problem and how to get the server to use more RAM?

  Total cpu load stay about 1 to 2%, network, all about 1500Mbps picks

  There is only one 25 GB os image file, and it slows down when all about 30-40 users open a session.

  This affect MaxSystemCacheMBytes? If I for example 1% or 200 MB, might lower it being 'forced' to spend more RAM?

  Screendump of x 64 connected site server

• Pools of multiple connections to the same physical Structure with SPR

  I use OBIEE 10.1.3.4 and have multiple physical databases that contain the exact same structure. Instead of creating the same physical structure in the RPD file with their own pools of connections, I would like to have a physical structure with multiple connections pools. I have this Setup, however, I can only see the data of one of the physical databases by using the right click, view data... option in the physical appearance of the RPD file. I searched and could not find a solution to my particular problem. Can someone point me in the right direction?

  Goal is to get the CPs separated... and then, you can use two data. But better to have 2 separate objects.

• is it possible that I can connect on 1 Web site under multiple connections determine?

  I need to be able to be connected on 1 Web site under multiple connections for my work. I am currently using an older version of internet explore is no longer be supported and none of the more recent browsers allow me to do. Is there a way I can configure firefox to support this?

  I tried to download this but is not available for version 26.0. Is it possible to restore my firefox or just wait until they update it?

  You have 2 versions behind now - Firefox 28.0 is the latest version, with Firefox 29,0 due to be released in 6 days.

  https://wiki.Mozilla.org/RapidRelease/calendar

• Multiple connection, but the connections are blocked port

  Hello

  If I want to have my windows 7 connected to two Internett different connections due to a block of some Web pages, and the other blocks all online games of (steam, origin, etc.)

  So my question is can I do a responsible only for browser data connection and the other connection to make all data on the computer.

  I saw this post on multiple connections. but I still need a connection can only be used for (chrome, firefox, ie, etc): http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-networking/multiple-internet-connections-in-windows-7-nlb/ffd5cb00-7330-452c-8f72-bb05fef7dbc5

  Also spesify the nettwork game log from time to time on a web browser, so the second connection cannot overide requires all web traffic or I won't be able to connect to the nettwork gaming. I have a script running at continualy connect on the web.

  All responses are welcome!

  Hello

  To ensure that you get the best response to this concern, we suggest that you post this query on the forum Web site the Microsoft Technet THERE that this issue is best handled by their level of expertise and support. To do this, visit this link.

  Best regards.

• multiple connections AWS

  Hi all

  Then MCAK manage multiple connections of AWS in the current version?

  If this is not the case, if there is a plan made me know.

  My customer wants to use several AWS regions (USA and Tokyo) because of the BCP/DR.

  Thank you

  Jun Kojima

  Yes, multi-Cloud is designed to manage multiple connections in the same or multiple platforms. You can even have multiple connections to the same AWS region by using different accounts to facilitate the assignment of chargeback. You also have the option of specifying and area availability.

  PS. a new version of the multi-Cloud kit will be available in late February with the offering of the CIAC Enterprise Edition 3.1.1 complete future scalability. For AWS, it will also support IP elastic, management and distribution of key pairs. The current MCAK for Starter Edition is recommended for the proof of concept only at this time.

• VSphere Client multiple connections to a single server vCenter Server?

  I have a vCenter Server that manages a few hosts. I know it's a bad habit to manage guests individually using vSphere Client, but I was wondering if I can have multiple connections to the same server vCenter Server vSphere client using the same Windows credentials?

  It seems counterproductive to only allow a connection to the server vCenter Server...

  Yes - by default, a connection up to 25 to vCenter

• Limiting errors while working with multiple connections

  I am currently evaluating Developer SQL and I'm looking for most of the features that allow connections several clearly distinct to avoid DBA errors when working with multiple connections in parallel.
  Currently, it seems that developer SQL provided these features:
  -Organization of folders in Explorer-> for example, we can create a folder per environment (DEV,...).
  -name of connection-> each user can define his own name. These aliases will appear in the tabs and the title of the main window when opening a connection.
  
  These features ar fairly limited if you compare with a tool like Toad, which used to associate colors with connections (good feature!) or define custom fields. In addition the database user is not displayed in the SQL Developer interface, unless we add in the name of the connection...
  
  Do you know if there are plans to improve these features in future releases of SQL Developer?
  Or, otherwise, it would be possible to quickly develop a plugin that can provide? (especially on the colors of connections)
  
  Thank you.

  Hello

  I opened the application, and you can add your voice to this. This isn't a feature that we can control, nor is it something that you can expand as it should be expelled from the underlying IDE. We requested a change in the IDE so that we can implement this improvement.

  Sue

• Connectivity WiFi problem

  Hello

  My features detailed on this machine are:

  Hi George,.

  There is a good chance it's actually a connection in Greece that is causing the problem. For example, if you were in a hotel with only one router or router to elderly with multiple people who use the internet, it will cause the internet is very slow. Next time you travel in Greece trying to access the internet at the airport. Airports generally have a better router and the wireless infrastructure in place, and you see how you internet high speed is there.

  Thank you

• New router BEFSR41 problems installing...

  I just installed a new version of my BEFSR41.  I had a version 2 and now have a version 4.3.  I have Road Runner internet and had no problem, just pick up my old router and hang a new.  A restart of the modem and I was able to connect to internet and my other 2 computers in the House.  However, I can't access the 192.168.1.1 configuration it won't let me past the password screen.  I tried the default "admin" with no luck.  A reset of the modem will fix this problem without screw it my internet connection and network...

  Also I had installed LELA and when I installed the new router it showed it as a gateway instead of the BEFSR41 router as he showed before.  I reinstalled but still the same bridge description. I uninstalled the program.

  TIA

  Your router must have a username is blank and the password "admin" (without the quotes).

  If this does not work, then the most likely cause for your problem is a problem of computer software firewall.  Go into your computer and temporarily disable your software firewall and see if that allows you to connect to your router.  With some computer software firewall, you will need to "trust" your router at 192.168.1.1

  If you still have problems, read on:

  Here are my tips for to connect you to your router:

  You need not be connected to the Internet to view the router's web pages.  These web pages are built into the router.
  Use Internet Explorer, it usually works.
  JavaScript must be enabled.
  Use a computer that is connected to the router.
  In the non-working computer, temporarily disable your firewall software.

  If you use Zone Alarm, do a right-click on the ZA icon in the taskbar (bottom right of screen) then click on "Shutdown ZoneAlarm" and see if that solves your problem. If this does not work, try the following with Zone Alarm: open the control center ZAISS, go to privacy, then temporarily disable Ad Blocking and Cookie Control and see if it solves your problem.

  If you use Noton Internet Security with the add-on Pack, don't forget to disable the blocker and ad blocker. Some users have reported that they needed to uninstall all Norton Add-on Pack.

  If you can not get anything to 192.168.1.1 then perhaps this is not the address of the router. Go to 'Start' > all programs > Accessories > command prompt.
  A black DOS window will appear. Type "ipconfig" (with no quotes), and press the Enter key. Look at the "default gateway". It is 192.168.1.1? Point your browser to the 'default gateway', can connect you to your router.

  If the above fails, unplug your modem router, then try again. If it solves your problem, then most likely your modem is actually a "modem-router". Check if your "modem" is using the same address as your Linksys router 192.168.1.x space. If this is the case, then the report with this problem and specify also the brand and exact model of your modem number.

  If all above fails them, turn off your entire system, unplug it from the wall, wait a minute, then lights up, then try again.

  If all the above tips fail, then reset the default router: power down the router and unplug all the wires. Wait a minute. Switch on the router, let it fully boot (1-2 minutes), then press and hold the reset for 30 seconds button, then release the button and allow the router to reset and restart (2-3 minutes). Turn off the router. Wait a minute. To connect to a computer, cable, a router's LAN port. Initialize the system. It should work.  Reset the default router will also reset your default Internet connection type.

  If the reset does not fix your system, then you must download and install (or reinstall) the latest firmware for your router. After the update of the firmware, you must reset the default router, and then configure the router again from scratch. If you have saved a router configuration file, DO NOT use it.

• Homegroup and multiple user account problems

  I have been searching the net for information and can't find anything that matches.  I'm having all kinds of problems through the homegroup and multiple user accounts.

  I would like to know: when a machine (laptop in this case) is off the network, the individual user accounts will remain visible under homegroup?

  If they are not, then homegroup is not for me.

  UPDATE and closing:

  I confirmed that the individual accounts of the user on a machine that visible to another when this computer is connected to another group residential computer on a local network domestic.  Why they don't look just like a homegroup internally I don't get except that the machine would always be part of a group residential e.g. a laptop, as in my case, would be carrying a homegroup with it and not be able to jump on another residential group in a different location.

  What was causing me a lot of trouble has AVG Free.  Attention, the installation of AVG Free homegroup PCs cannot meet or is inconsistent at best.  My laptop would show the user accounts, but not the other homegroup PCs and both could indicate that there is no other available HG machine or sometimes invites you to create a homegroup.  It was a nightnare.

• Windows does not start correctly when some multiple connection for external hard drive USB hubs are connected

  When starting, I have 2 USB hubs that connect to multiple external HD.

  If I disconnect the hubs, windows always starts very well.

  If I connect the HUB, windows delayed considerably the boot (approximately 5 to 10 minutes) and sometimes restarts the PC before getting to the screen of windows login, and after that the Windows logo is displayed during the start-up phase.

  Some HD sometimes take to start I hear but why Windows is restarted and all simply just do not excluding the HD or hubs does not not as expected?

  Any clue?

  Hello Patrick,.

  If other devices are working well, then clearly the USB ports have gone very well. I would say more that likely you have two defective USB Hub (it happens, I have several other defective in my junk mail boxes!).

  Given that the hubs are relatively expensive, I suggest you replace the two hubs with more heavy duty those able to withstand the high external HARD disk requirements. Try Newegg.com and TigerDirect.com, sort by best rating.

  The other thing, you don't mention if your hubs / ports are ports USB 3.0 and if you use a card like the adapter link. These configurations can sometimes cause problems, and it might be useful to re - check the different connections.

  Keep me posted.

  And thanks a lot for this.

  Kind regards

  BearPup

• ISE-guest user account multiple connections

  Hello

  How do ISE I only allow a connection to the guest both user account.    the real problem I have is when I give a username invited to someone, it can circulate this userid with others and multiple unauthorized guests use this unique user id to connect to the portal comments

  In any case restrict?

  Limiting the guests at a Session active network

  You can restrict the guests to have a single device connected to the network at a time. When clients try to connect with another device, the device is automatically disconnected from the network.

  It is a global setting that affects all the portals comments.

  Step 1 choose Administration > management Web portal > settings > comments > political portal.

  Step 2 check the only guest session authorized by user option.

  Step 3 click Save.

• avoiding the multiple connection so that others

  If I nested call of procs such as JAVA p1 calling calling calling p3 p2 calling p4 and each of them have a call to a stored procedure to the error in the log and re-raise so that the java layer is notified of the exception, then the error is recorded several times in each nested proc as the exception propagates upward to the java layer and is trapped by WHEN E.A. and revived each proc. Even if I take Tom Kytes advice and limit the OTHERS WHEN in p1 alone though the outermost proc I would still need to log the exception exactly where it happens because I have all the context information tell in p3. But WHEN OTHERS in p1 would always double check the exception.
  
  Any successful implementation of suggestions / real to this problem?

  user4900730 wrote:

  That's exactly my question. I want to immediately connect the error say p3. But how should I inform p2 and p1 it has already been saved.

  You can use a global variable (defined in a packet header and usable by any code of PL in this session) for example is a Boolean.

  If TRUE then the LogMessage() procedure called from an exception handler logs an exception. If FALSE, it is not.

  You can now set to true by default. The first time that LogMessage() is called in a session, she saves this exception, and then set the variable false - preventing any future exception being saved.

  So what you want to do, is not feasible. I wonder, however, whether this approach is sensitive for the reasons that I said previously.

  The previous answer by BILLY VERREYNE indicates that multiple logging of the error should not be considered a problem. Maybe I'll settle for that.

  You can always report on an exception. Let's say that your LogMessage() procedure registers the exception with a timestamp of system (using a stand-alone insert) and with a single session or the process identifier, a journal table.

  P3 throws an exception. It connects there. P2 catches, saves her and it triggers again. P3 grabs and it opens a session.

  You have now 3 exceptions to the process. Each with a different timestamp. Your report for people dealing with exceptions can select the first exception (using the time stamp) that took place for this process.

  At the same time, you have a pile of complete call procedures that handled the exception which may shed more light on who called p3 when the 3 p exception occurred.

  Consistencyis a concept important in software engineering *. Consistency in design. Consistency in the code.

  If the p1 exception handler must act differently from p2 and 3 p (because of the requirement of logging) exception handlers, you now have an inconsistency in the design and code. This makes the design more complex and more complex code. Increase of complexity makes the code more difficult to read and to understand and maintain. Increases the likelihood of bugs.

  This is the fundamental reason why I don't like the approach you plan to record an exception only once to avoid a kind of duplication. There is inconsistent behavior of the code and exception handlers.

  Rather deal with this (no exception duplicate) requirement to report on this matter - as it is much more logical to apply the filter and reports logic to transform the data on exceptions in useful information for users.