Need to zoom lens

I have a Canon Rebel t3i & I was wondering what would be the best lens to buy for the zoom. Any help will be greatly apperciated! TIA

You did not get the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens of STM with your T3i?  Yes, you have a zoom. So, do you want a telephoto lens to add?  It is always best to keep your equipment even if a good choice would be the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5. 6 objective IS of STM.  It fits very well.

Tags: Canon Camera

Similar Questions

  • Canon Zoom lens

    Hello world

    wish you all agreat day,

    After the Suggestions in this forum for my camera so my first goal... Thanks guys I bougth the Canon 6 d and bought the Canon 17-40 photos of couple in my first Attcched lens...

    Now I'm looking for a zoom lens, any suggestions? with good quality / mony? Honestly I do not put a budget for it still don't intend to but something so dear, my favorate style is architecture & urban landscape, but some times I may need a zoom so out for some shots my need more than what I have now (canon 17-40).

    Thanks for the passage & thank you for the support.

    Concerning

    But what would you use for?  That tells you what focal length to get.

    You already have the range of 17 to 40 covered. Which can be used for your walk around lens that it stops a little short for this to 40 mm. I use a 35mm Prime than my walk around and I Zoom with my feet so I think you can also.

    For a standard telephoto lens that is the EF 70-200mm L f/2.8 IS Mk 2.  In the United States, he sells between $1 800.00 and $300.00 2.  It's a fantastic lens. Sharp. Many colors. Ideal in low light. Great bokeh. And the focal range is very usable on a full camera frame. Not often is too long to be useful.

    If you need a longer telephoto let us know and people can suggest lenses longer but the good ones cost dear and you can also lose the opening f/2.8 nice if you get a telephoto lens more long. Unless you really spend a lot on a 300 mm f/2.8 or 400 mm.

  • CS4 - magnify or tool of the Zoom lens?

    I need to create a "magnifying glass effect" on a part of a drawing. I found a tutorial explaining a tool in CorelDraw (lens magnify) which does exactly what I need to do. However, I was not able to find this tool/effect AI CS4.

    Can someone tell me if such a tool exists in CS4? If it is not a tool specifically designed for this, are there free or inexpensive plugins that can do? In the absence of such, tutorials or tips on how to do it?

    Thank you!!

    Sean

    Wow, I'm not so sure that I want to tell you how I could do that in Illustrator considering how the Mag in Corel Draw tool is cool.

    But here we are. Copy the layer any of the art (Option drag the layer to the layer icon Add in the layers panel) draw a circle in the place that you want to zoom, make sure that the circle is the first element more in the new layer. Click the icon at the bottom of the layers panel clipping mask. This should hide all on this layer except for the items in the circle you drew. Select now all on this layer by clicking on the ball of meat for that layer in the layers panel (the point on the right side of the layer in the layers panel) this should select all the elements on this layer. Now use the effects > distort and Transform > Transform to compensate for the circle of mag where you want.

    There is no tool like Corel Draw zoom lens or magnifying glass. However, would be an interesting feature request.

  • The zoom lens compatibility

    I have an EOS REBEL G and want to know if a vivitar 75-205 macro zoom lens 22005946 No. is going to work on it.

    If you are looking at a manual focus zoom Vivitar 75-205mm F3. 8 - f4.8... This was done for the old Canon FD lens mount used on FTb, AE-1, a-1, F-1, etc. of the cameras... Serial number #22xxxxxxx you mention strongly suggests he is a FD lens, made by Kiron for Vivitar. If this is the case, it's probably a very nice lens, but...

    No, which cannot be used on any EOS camera (film or digital). These all use the modern EF mount.

    I did a search and did not find any Vivitar 75-205mm in the modern mount. So I think that what you're watching is the old FD mount and the answer is 'no' (this is probably why it's so cheap).

    EDIT: there is a 75-300mm lens Canon EF that sells expensive and will work on a g of rebels. It is not the best lens optically or for general performance, but it is one of the lowest cost since this seems to be your biggest concern. This can be purchased for as little as $115 (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-EF-III-Telephoto-Packaging/dp/B00GEE8I1Y/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=13910997...). You might be able to find it for less used.

    ***********
    Alan Myers

    San Jose, California, USA.
    «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
    MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

  • Canon 18-200mm zoom lens

    I'm new here.  I have a Canon T3i.  Two kit lenses came with it in a bundle... 18-55mm, 55-250mm.  I am considering getting the Canon 18-200mm.  Would be the Canon 18-200mm is a good choice to replace the two lenses, or are there better choices to replace them with and keep the 18-200mm too?

    I wouldn't buy one for several reasons.  The one above all, it is more difficult to zoom, when the zoom range becomes very extreme.  18-200 is a 11 x scope and very ambitious to say the least. Not only in mind but in build quality, too. It will be in the same level of quality that the two glasses, the only advantage is to have just a lens so you.  Is that what you need? The superior advantage of a digital SLR is the possibility of having the right lens for the good work.  This implies usually several different lenses.  So you will be defeated this concept a little!

    I'd rather see you get a different level of lens for example IS the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM Lens.  Directly by replacing your 18-55mm kit lens. Of course, it is in the case where you have does not work for you. But this approach is better built, better optics and a little more quickly the objective that can be very useful.  Don't get me wrong the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM lens is a very good lens and offers a constant aperture.  A great plus in my book.

    Unfortunately these lens upgrades are expensive and replacing the 55-250mm is going to be even more.

  • Canon EF 70-210mm F/4.0 Macro Zoom Lens

    A Canon EF 70-210mm lens Zoom Macro F/4.0 is already used on a Canon EOS 630 is usable on modern SLRS like the Canon 6 d?

    should work the same, BUT it is perhaps not as optically perfect like new lenses. With film, you were not able to expand your negatives in the same way you can with a digital file using your monitor to display 100%. Some like to do that but in the real world, when you print that big with excellent results.

  • I need a one-lens solution for my needs of photo at high speed of Corvette racing. 35-350L will do?

    I need a lens to carry on my 1 d in the long road to the rally with Corvette racing club.  The 35-350L would be a good canditate?

    You have a 1 d?   Or you have a seires 1 d camera later?

    I used and still use a 1 d.  It would not be my first choice, or 2nd or 3rd for Motorsports shooting with some goal.

    Into the 4MP, you're going to be really handicapped in any kind of extensions.

    The 1 d is a fantastic device and at the same time the best camera in the world with one, at the cost of about 8 long, crazy.

    If you indeed have a 1 d, I am looking for a 1 series later and best buy is now a 1 d Mk III.

    The addition of the EF 35-350mm f3.5 - 5.6, or better yet the EF 28-350 mm f3.5 - 5.6 should work well.

    With a lot of practice such as suggested above.

  • Nikon 200-500 f5.6 zoom lens correction

    Hello

    I got a Nikon 200-500 f5.6 zoom come and found it there is no lens correction in Lightroom 5, is there an update for it

    Hi ferrarinan

    This lens is supported in Lightroom version 6/CC.

    Refer to working with profiles of lenses in Adobe Camera Raw and Photoshop, Lightroom

    Concerning

    Assani

  • Zoom lens combination as an alternative to the 18-55mm and 55-250mm lens for my T3i?

    I have a T3i with 18-55mm and 55-250mm objectives.  Switching lenses visits is a nuisance.  The shorter one is required for pictures close to the museums, galleries, blocked sites, ourselves and our friends, etc.  Longer lenses are useful for many city outdoor and rural/mountain shots.  Is there a combination priced zoom that I should consider?  Y at - it somewhere that I can sell my current lenses.  My T3i and lenses are less than a year.  Thank you.

    There are a lot of options out there for "superzooms" If that's what you're looking for.  This is a decent article on them, and to explain some of the advantages and disadvantages:

    http://www.TechRadar.com/us/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/best-superzoom-for-Canon-DSLRs-8-...

    I see a lot of recommendations for http://www.fredmiranda.com/ to buy and sell used.  But I know you are going to get much for those kit lenses.  Can be difficult to find a buyer, but you never know.

  • Script needed downtown Zoom image to fit the width mode full screen

    So here's the situation: I am full screen/no menus and I would like an image to center the zoom to fit the width of my screen. This would save some time by rubbing the zoom.

    Does anyone know a script out there that would do exactly that? I could assign a keyboard shortcut, and it would be a time saver.

    Photoshop CC 2015.0.1/OSX 10.10.5

    Gene

    And when you use the button of the screen fill zoom than nothing is registered by the logger Plugin or scriptlistener Action. When your layout fullscreen it no way to get to the screen from filling key, there is no. If you use the button before switching to fullscreem mode when you enter mode full screen zoom level of the image does not fill the screen.

  • Need to zoom out to see the clips in the monitor of the Organizer

    Hello

    I'm working on a project with PAL AVCHD HD1080i 25 parameters. When I put a clip on the timeline, it is too much for the monitor Panel. Is it possible to zoom out in the monitor Panel, so that the frame is visible please?

    Yes. Right-click and select magnification > Fit

    See you soon,.
    --
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, get you your children

  • Need help zoom

    I have problems with < mx:VSlider >. I have a < mx:container > that contains approximately 50 polygons of type UIComponent. I wish I had a VSlider buzzing the container to. However, when I change the width and height of the container, the UIComponents don't change size with her. Can I use a mx.effects.zoom to zoom in the container and all children using buttons. I would get the same effect with a VSlider however. Please, take a look at my code and I would like to know how I can solve this problem. Thanks for the help!

    I was able to solve this problem by changing my changeSize (event) to it. Obviously scrollX/scrollY change the size of the container and all of its children. It is strange for me, however, that defining the width and height of the container do not have children, and even try to change manually the width/height of the child has no effect.

  • need my zoom screen

    my screen icons are so big, how can I solve the

    Hold down the Ctrl Key and rotate the mouse wheel.
     
     
  • Is it possible to get the Lr 6 for the FE 24-240 zoom SONY lens profile in Lr 5.7.1?

    I see that Lr 6 has this profile of 24-240 zoom lens, but is not in 5.7.1.  It would be really nice if the profile could be loaded in 5.7.1 as there is nothing in the 6 that I need and want the RAW/ARW profile for lens of ths.  Any help out there?

    The profiles installed by the DNG Converter are used only in PS/ACR not LR.

    Under Windows, you can copy the profile of the LCP under LR 6 to get 5 LR uses a profile of LR 6:

    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Lightroom\Resources\LensProfiles\1.0\Sony\ (Sony FE 24-240mm F3. 5 - 6.3 OSS) - RAW.lcp

    to the third-party joint profile areas of your users folder structure, here, where you may need to create the download folder:

    C:\Users\ (username) \AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Downloaded

  • Canon, in the face of fast moving subjects 18-55 kit lens?

    Hi everyone, I'm new here.

    I was doing one shoot the other day on very fast subjects that changed a lot of direction (dogs). Got some good shots but the vast majority were evil out of the home, which was a real shame. I want to know if it's the lens, the body or my technique that does not reach me.

    I'm relatively new to photography, so maybe it's that my settings are wrong or my technique is bad. I'm using the lens wide open, not mode live view with servo AF on a 600 d body. Usually when I focus I pan just the camera turn to follow the subject, sometimes pressing down when I want to shoot.

    I plan the upgrade to the 17-55 f2.8 because it is sharp wide open and has a constant and fast opening and USM and full-time manual focus with a correct focus ring.

    Thank you.

    Your problems are probably due to a combination of factors. IMO, auto focus performance is determined by three things...

    1. camera AF capabilities. Your 600 d has 9 AF points system. Only one of these points - the center one - is the "best" type of cross that is more responsive and follows the movement better. When shooting moving subjects with your camera, it would be useful to limit yourself to using only the central point. (Note: other Canon cameras have more advanced systems of the AF.) T4i, T5i, 60 d, 50 d and 40 d has 9 AF points that looks like, but all nine points are the cross-type sesnors 'better '. The 7 d and 70 d AF 19 points, with all of the nineteen cut type. 5DIII and 1DX 61 points AF with up to 41 Cup type, depending on the lens used.)

    Some cameras are also optimized for performance development. For example, the models of the series 1 d and 7 d have a separate chip driving AF... While most (maybe all?) other models share the tasks of AF by the same processor that handles images.

    2 capacity autofocus lens: Yes, a reader of "USM" (Ultrasonic Motor) objective as the EF-S 17 - 55 / 2.8 would be an improvement on your kit lens. It is faster, less hunting and is quieter than a 'micro' such as is used in the cheaper kit lens. (Note: there is a version a bit more of the 18-55mm with drive focus "STM" or "Stepper motor", which is better than the micro motor version, but still not as fast as USM.) STM lenses are running silent and particularly well suited for video.)

    A larger aperture, like the 17-55 / 2.8 (as opposed to your 18-55/3.5-5.6), offers more light to the camera AF sensors, allowing for faster and better follow-up.

    No, forget all the EF 50/1.8... Of course, he got more openness, but it uses a micro motor and is widely known to be developed slower, less accurate and likely to hunt more than a USM lens. If you want a quick and of course focusing in short and medium telephoto, look to the EF 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100/2 or L-135/2 lenses. These all use USM drive and are much faster and more accurate than the EF 50/1.8. They have also one or two larger max aperture stop that even the 17-55 / 2.8 (or any other zoom lens), provide more light for the camera to work with. Using a f2.8 lens or "faster" will give optimal performance on your camera, with the centre of focus.

    A few drinks simply are not designed to be developed fast, even if they have more large openings and USM focus. Macro lenses, for example, have to move their focus group a long, long way to go from infinity to 1:1 magnification tends to be slower. In addition, very large aperture lenses such as the 85 / 1.2 L are generally slower... Design. Very large aperture lenses and macro focus on precision, to deal with the shallow depth of the effects on the ground, rather than speed.

    Other objectives are designed to the very fast development. All 70-200, the 100-400 and all the first 300mm lenses and more, are quite fast focusing. Extreme telephotos such as 500 and 600 mm can be difficult to get and keep on target, however.

    Some third-party lenses also make use of similar to Canon's USM development drive, to help the performance of the update. Sigma HSM and Tamron lenses USD are examples.

    3. skills of the user is the third key factor making the update performance... that is, your technique.

    You mention servos 'AF '...  Just to clarify, yourcamera has three focus modes: one-shot, HAVE Focus and AI Servo... There is no "Servo AF. The correct mode to use with moving subjects is AI Servo. Perhaps what you are already doing. In any case, One Shot is almost only used with stationary subjects (there are techniques of 'pre-focus' where it can be used with moving subjects, but those who are rarely used). I Focus is not really a foucs mode at all... It is supposed to decide for you, if the subject is moving, then change to use the correct mode. I have not tested on a recent, but older model where I tried, I found a slight delay that causes a lot of discussion missed shots. He also simply chose the wrong mode sometimes. It might be interesting to note that Canon more pro-oriented models have same AI Focus... they offer only One Shot or AI Servo.

    So, make sure that you are using AI Servo to maximize performance when shooting moving subjects.

    You also use a slow shutter speed. I inflate the ISO and try to use 1/500 or faster shutter speeds. 1/320 or 1/400 is very marginal, trying to stop the movement of the subject with something as fast as the dogs in action. In fact, more you are close to the subject, shutter speed more fast you will really need to freeze movement.

    Cannon also noted that the 18MP models are a little prone to blur shake camera - probably because of the high density of pixels on the sensor sites - and recommends keeping shutter speeds upwards to be sure to get a sharp shot, even with IS lenses. There was a white paper on this subject, on the Canon website. I don't know if it is still available online.

    You should be able to get nice images, specific to ISO 1600... a complete stop of two higher and you to use much faster shutter speed. However, if the indoor shooting it may be areas that are not as well informed and are hard to get a sharp shot.

    You can shoot RAW files, so that you can more fully control noise reduction and factors in post-processing exposure when using high ISO.

    A popular technique among photographers of sports/action is back button to the point. See this article online, on this subject: http://www.learn.usa.canon.com/resources/articles/2011/backbutton_af_article.shtml

    BBF separates the function of the development of the trigger. You use rather your thumb on one of the rear camera buttons to start and stop the development. Many users feel that this allows more safe and followed acquistion with moving subjects. You can configure your camera for BBF and give it a try. It is possible for action/sport/HAVE Servo shooting, it's actually usable once, too... I used it enough only for a few years now.

    With the help of BBF, I start AF well before that I want to take the picture, then focus on the maintenance of the area to focus on the right of the subject where I want the lens to focus continuing to follow and maintain the emphasis... then take pictures along the way. I use the Center Focus point alone, much of the time. This could lead to too centered images, so I try to fit a little loose from time to time, allowing cropping to make that fewer centered images. I sometimes use other than the Center AF point... but who wouldn't recommend with action shot on a camera that does not have the type sensors crossed to peripheral issues, such as your 600 d.

    I use a pair of 7Ds and a number of USM lenses fast development of shoot a lot of sports. With a few years of practice under my belt, on avearage I nail focus on 95 to 98 on 100 shots using this type of gear with the above techniques. I turned to 4000 images at an event recent and marked about 30 people like "rejected" to missed focus problems (and I bet at least half of those who are my fault... not the machine). There may be a few others that are marginally acceptable (i.e., can make an 8 x 10 beautiful print, but seem not good any more greater than). Yet, even if there are 80 or 120 spleen focus, it is only 2 or 3%... much better than only 10% in short.

    I would say that qualities of objective performance and user techniques generally count more than the camera well, or at least can largely compensate for any camera shortcomings. I got results almost as good 50 d and 30 d before it (which were similar to your 600 d AF system) and even with 10 days earlier ("lower" than your AF system). Although I'm a bit away, I didn't like good luck shooting moving subjects using 5 d Mark II (I mostly just use it for stationary subjects)... the 5 d Mark III has a much better AF system and follows the movement much better.

    I hope this helps!

    ***********
    Alan Myers

    San Jose, California, USA.
    «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
    MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

Maybe you are looking for