NI PXI - 8108 RT with real-time compatibility 2009 and PXI-1050

Similar Questions

• I have an installed with real-time PXI-8109 module. Displays the indicator USER1?

  Hi all

  I have an installed with real-time PXI-8109 module.

  USER1 indicator LED displays on the Panel?

  Thank you

  The LEDs of the user are the indicators that you can control programmatically if needed be.

  -Jayk

• Preparation of VCP with real-time scenarios

  Hi all

  I have a plan to make the vcp and I already save VCP official traning.

  Can someone provide me with real-time scenarios or case study (any site, Document) for the construction of the test lab and play with the test lab.

  Kindly advice me for this

  Kind regards

  Knani V.

  Hello

  vLaunchPad is good collection of resources. But you will have to filter for your need. http://VLP.vSphere-land.com/

  Specifically for problems, you can watch this http://www.vmadmin.co.uk/vmware

  I'm not advertising these two links. I found that it is very useful. That's all.

• Time indicated on incoming and outgoing emails not correct with real time sent or received

  Time that appears on all my incoming emails indicating when they were sent and the time on my outgoing e-mail is incorrect and does not take account of real time.

  How can I fix it?

  The time displayed is applied by the email server - be it MSN, Yahoo!, GMail, or somewhere else.  If it is showing the wrong time zone for you, then you should check the settings of your account on the server and if he knows what time zone you are in. - B-
  http://www.officeforlawyers.com
  Author: Guide to counsel for Microsoft Outlook

• Analyzers of vector signals OR, in real time of tektronix and tests EMC spectrum analyzers

  Normal
  0

  21

  fake
  fake
  fake

  PT - BR
  X NONE
  X NONE

  MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

  / * Style definitions * /.
  table. MsoNormalTable
  {mso-style-name: "Table normal";}
  MSO-knew-rowband-size: 0;
  MSO-knew-colband-size: 0;
  MSO-style - noshow:yes;
  MSO-style-priority: 99;
  MSO-style - qformat:yes;
  "mso-style-parent:" ";" "
  MSO-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt;
  MSO-para-margin-top: 0 cm;
  MSO-para-margin-right: 0 cm;
  MSO-para-margin-bottom: 10.0pt;
  MSO-para-margin-left: 0 cm;
  line-height: 115%;
  MSO-pagination: widow-orphan;
  font-size: 11.0pt;
  font family: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif ';
  MSO-ascii-font-family: Calibri;
  MSO-ascii-theme-make: minor-latin;
  MSO-hansi-font-family: Calibri;
  MSO-hansi-theme-make: minor-latin;
  mso-fareast-language: EN-US ;}

  1. how to work if vector performance of or
  Analyzers of signals compare to Tektronix real-time spectrum analyzers?

  2 can you emulate Tektronix FFT
  processing overlapping?

  3. is it possible to use vector of NOR
  Analyzers of signals of compliance EMC and/or test preconformite? Is there some
  companies use it successfully? Need a special or custom software?

  Thank you

  Hi emc2006

  I'll answer your questions separated by your topics:

  1 - What is the factor that you want to compare between these two products? In the link below, you will find the performance of the NI PXI-5660 RF Signal Analyzer system.
  2. you can develop this feature of programming in software Application development, i.e. of LabVIEW.
  3. Yes, NI´s vector signal Analyzer could run preconformite or EMC compliance analyses. In the same link below, you will find in the subdivision of Applications.

  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/tut/p/ID/4298

  Concerning

  Napoleao
  Application engineering
  National Instruments

• want to compare the data in excel with real-time signal

  Hello

  my request is to check the PCB pins of I/o... Firstly I have signal corresponding to each pin in GOOD PCB board and the output of each needle is saved in excel using scripture to the spreadsheet... then the database be act as master for more tips of PCB...

  If I want to check the other pcb edge means that the same signals should be send on the pin of each Member of the PCB... received out of the Council should check with the data already stored in the database if this is the way to match status LED should illuminate otherwise is not to shine...

  pls help me finish this application... I have attached model vi with poster and Excel in too...

  I hate to say it, but you don't have really any type of application there.  It is quite difficult to help you complete when you barely started.  An express VI couple in a sequence structure do not apply.

  What you need to do is sit down and write a design specification.  What are your entries for this application? What are your results?  What do you think the UI to look like?  What steps do you need to do to go from A to B?  Chart out.

• The 1473R CAN be used with the real-time operating system of NOR?

  Hello, I am trying to determine if I can use the OR 1473R framegrabber PCIe FPGA in a PC based computer time real OS OR. Anyone know if this is possible? So I think that it should appear to the OS in real-time as a target FPGA that can transfer the data via DMA, but I wanted to make sure the drivers would work in real time of NEITHER.

  I appreciate any info on this!

  lukepike,

  Yes, you can use this device with real-time OS of NOR.

• How to set up a database of Eve 'apply in real time '.

  Hi all

  11 GR 2,

  Rhel6

  How to set up real-time apply such as the transactions are updated in near real-time to the wait, even without switching to log files?

  For example, we have 1 GB size redo logs and assuming that it will take 1 day to fill these newspapers. This means that our expectation will be entitled to 1 day delay of data?

  This means we lost 1 day of a disaster at the primary data value? because the redo log was not able to move the log files?

  Thank you very much

  JC

  Hello

  Hope this helps

  Real time apply ---> all committed changes should have been applied in standby mode

  How to:

  standby mode

  SQL > alter database recover managed standby undo;

  SQL > change managed database recovery ensures assistance to disconnect log current;        --> You should have SRL and this command works up to 11g, 12 c apply by default start with real time

  At the primary level: check the recovery mode:

  SELECT DEST_ID, RECOVERY_MODE FROM V$ ARCHIVE_DEST_STATUS WHERE DEST_ID = 2;

  Read only apply with--> is called as--> ACTIVE DATA GUARD redo apply when the database is open read-only

  
  

  standby mode

  SQL > alter database recover managed standby undo;

  SQL > alter database open read-only.

  SQL > change managed database recovery ensures assistance to disconnect log current;        --> You should have SRL and this command works up to 11g, 12 c apply by default start with real time

  SQL > select name, open_mode, controlfile_type, db_unique_name from v$ database;

  Thank you

• WebCenter real-time Collaboration

  Hello world
  
  I'm interesting on this topic. Is any documentation regarding installation, 'WebCenter real-time Collaboration' configuration and integration with Oracle webcenter.
  
  Greeting
  Andres
  
  Edited by: user10387663 January 6, 2011 13:05

  For the moment, it's OK. Even when you don't plan to use RTC, you always rely on other services of the hive. For example, a future conference planning requires time management Service. There are a few things we can do to simplify things in the future, but those who are more long term.

  Hope that helps,

  -Marc

• Real - Time apply a few times using archived log file

  Hi all
  
  I have a doubt about the real time apply in Oracle 10g 10.2.0.4 version where the arch process has been configured on the primary and standby has been configured for maximum performance with real time mode applies.
  
  But in the alert log file shall I use to find the message below rarely

  Media Recovery Log /oraclearch/oraarch/ctdr/5548.dbf
  Media Recovery Log /oraclearch/oraarch/ctdr/5549.dbf

  So my question is why the archived files are applied pending have been configured for real-time if applies where it should apply only from logs in mode standby online.
  
  Also I can't find any information on the eve of the database in the view v$ standby_log that these pending online log files have been archived in the column archived, then how to find how much data was written by process Srl rfs...
  
  -Yasser

  Hello

  The server process (RFS) remote file writes data to redo in files newspapers awaiting restoration by increase the standby database, application services log can recover again waiting for redo log files, as they are filled.

  Please visit http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14239/log_apply.htm

  Thank you
  Baskar.l

• Real time clock RTC accuracy test

  How do you verify the accuracy of the RTC?

  This computer is new and has been placed in use on 20/09/2015.

  Time is controlled through www.time.is

  He said that the time is always delayed if you use windows 7 Professional.

  When the time settings are changed by updating, it will very frequently show exact time.

  The CMOS RTC battery has been replaced with a new battery and has not changed.

  An external flash drive has been used to download a utility and then Ubuntu was installed on the flash drive so that Ubuntu starts after a fresh boot.

  There is no period of time with Ubuntu.  With Ubuntu, the time is coming.

  With windows 7 Professional, the time varies and moves of 0.7 seconds to 1 minute or sometimes 1 minute and 30 seconds.

  With Ubuntu, time progresses varies and moves of exact time to 0.9 seconds ahead of testing about 12 hours.

  How did the two operating systems produce different results?  The one with the period of delay and the other with the time to follow?

  What was/is the software that other messages make reference to test the accuracy of the RTC?  Was UEFI, or something else?  For this computer just to edge of diagnosis or UEFI tests have so far managed.

  How do you check the Crystal in the motherboard?

  How do you check the RTC chip in the motherboard?

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community Forum.

  According to the description of the issue, I recommend you post your query in the TechNet Forums. TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you.

  TechNet Forum

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?category=w7itpro

  Hope this information is useful.

• NOR-DAQmx compatibility with the system in real time

  I try to use a time system 11 with LabVIEW Real-time. When I try to connect with the driver OR DAQmx, an error saying that the version of the NOR-DAQmx drivers are bundles with the one on the real time. I tried to use different versions of the NOR-DAQmx drivers that are available in the table of compatibility, but not those who worked. I have an old computer working with the same real-time system that uses LabVIEW 9 and has the driver NOR-DAQmx 9.3.5 f0 driver installed on it but I can't find the drivers on the web. What should I do?

  I am using LabVIEW 2015 in my current computer.

  Thanks in advance.

  Looks like you can just have a lag in the versions of software installed on your host computer and the target.  In order to deploy the code from your host to your target, the two must have corresponding to libraries of functions.  See this link for instructions on updated versions of the software on your target match those installed on your host computer, the wizard of the LabVIEW RT software.  If you have already done this, and it did not help, please provide a screenshot or error code of the message that is to appear.

• Application errors of the RT with the PXI-4461 with Labview real-time 9.0.1, DAQmx 9.0.2

  HI -.

  I recently converted a PXI time system real OS (PXI-1042 q chassis, controller PXI-8187, DAQ, PXI-4461, DAQ, PXI-6259). I can write and run DAQmx applications in real time with the 6259 very well. Whenever I try to write a labview RT app to use the 4461, however, it will fail. Note that I can use two cards through MAX I tried switching card slots, just in case it was a problem. Both cards worked with labview, the PXI chassis was before Windows.

  Attached are pictures of the screw base demo I built to show the problem. Since I was a mistake (-200758) if I started from the raw strings, I tried to create a MAX task and use it. The task, but he complained of a buffer is too small. I explicitly put the buffer to work around this problem and still get the same error (-200608). I've also attached a screenshot of the software currently on the Max MAX RT PXI system is version 4.6.2 btw. (I installed the most/all this from DS1 Dev Suite 2010 version).

  Please let me know if I hurt something installed, versions if 4461 just don't play nice with the new BT or RT software, or if something is wrong. Thank you.

  Kregg

  The first error you see is (details in the help-> error explain in LV)

• LabVIEW 2014 SP1, hardware and real-time PXI

  I'm doing my third LabVIEW Wipe/reinstall in as many days, completely frustrated (and after several calls an hour with the support of NEITHER).  Here's the situation:

  I wrote a fairly large (1000 VI) project of Acquisition/control of our graduate students data used for behavioral experiment on sound localization.  It was developed in 2012 LabVIEW with the module running on a PC/PXI system real time.  It worked very well and was brought successfully under LabVIEW 2014 (with upgrades comparable to the software of the PXI.

  About 18 months ago the students began to write their theses, and at one point stopped gathering data.  Also, at some point, I upgraded the software on this system to LabVIEW 2014 SP1, but I am not sure that I never tested my software with this new system.

  This week, I pulled up the system to use MAX to open some test on the PXI multifunction and DIO card panels to control manually one of the stimuli.  I discovered that MAX could not communicate with the advice on the PXI system - he attributes them as devices VISA, indicating each Board with an icon with a red X means that he could not communicate with the IP that I had assigned to PXI.  Yet, MAX (a) could "discover" this PXI, (b) MAX can 'see' its IP address, and (c) Windows could not only Ping the IP, but could FTP on the drive of the PXI and I could move files back and forth.

  I did two sequences complete "Wipe/reinstall" using LabVIEW 2014 SP1, all giving the same result.  I know it has worked in the past, including when I installed LabVIEW 2014 (without SP1), something I repeat myself now with my third installation.  I discussed with OR (thin?) possibility that there is a "hidden defect" in the Distribution of the SP1, one that is visible to LabVIEW RT users using PXI hardware and go unnoticed because (a) install a few sites of LabVIEW versions SP1, (b) a minority use the RT Modules and (c) PXI is "old material".

  If anyone has such a system or saw a similar problem, please answer.  I'll do a follow-up post if I managed to 'fix' my system by this last reinstallation "a solution of worked before."

  Bob Schor

  Well, the answer is that, in my system, LabVIEW 2014 SP1 with LabVIEW Real-time connected to a PXI system does not appear to connect to boards plugged into the chassis.  Returning to LabVIEW 2014 (fall release), installed in exactly in the same way that the three failed attempts of LabVIEW 2014 SP1, works immediately.  Engineers OR will try to duplicate/verify/possibly patch? in this issue.

  Bob Schor

• Shared variable of subjects with the executable in real-time

  We have a PXi target running Labview time real 8.5 and we use a series of shared variables for communication between the target and the client software. The code was developed (and used) in the last 2 years, and presented no problems with the shared variables when they are deployed since the Project Explorer (for the target and the laptop based client software). However, when you try to run an executable version on the system time PXI real target of exactly the same engine code variable shared seems to fail during the initial loading. Since it is an executable, it is difficult to display errors, but it seems that the accident occurred at the beginning of the program when we try to initialize a number of shared variables. Sometimes it loads but probably only 10% of the time. When you plug the tool to debug for code and restarting the executable, runs without any problem. However, once we managed to capture and error (error-1950678982 the shared variable client side read buffer is full).

  I checked a number of messages in the Knowledge Base (e.g. how to deploy Variables of a compiled executable shared network?), but it still has not solved the problem. Thoughts and suggestions?

  Adrian

  I tested it for a few hours now and I can't make it fail again. The big difference in my implementation was to use your suggestion, and no wire the error cluster through the method since the error it generates caused a number of questions later. So let me summarize the final configuration that seems to work then:

  -during the execution and executable on a target time real 8.5, startup not connected to a client. Library of shared variable hosted on the target and should load by itself.

  -J' added a flat structure sequence on the vi 'main' (top of page vi executable) with a node (as shown above) Invoke method in the first structure with a timer to 10 seconds and the rest of the code in the second part of the structure. The shared variable library has been copied to the target in a data directory and the path provided to the method (the same way as above) and the IP address is that of the target.

  I discovered that it takes about 8-9 seconds for the shared variable engine and library to start (I don't remember is that past exactly that) and it is important to wait this time to initialize shared variables or the behavior is unpredictable. The method always generates the error 1043 (function not supported) but I simply ignore it now, and it seems to work.

  Thanks for your help! I will let you know if there is some instability in the future, but everything looks good from here.