Passing on large networks within an Eventstructure

Hello

I have a loop within a structure of the event that creates a great array(~650mb) auto-index-tunnel. In the next step, I want to read this table to another event. Each approach I tried to copy this large table at some point.

The best I could find so far is to store it in a global variable. But what Labview reads for the global variable it creates a copy of hole, even if I need only a small part of this table.

I have attached a vi to show my database structure.

Thank you

Matthias

If you do everything right, there will be one additional copy.

Make it a rule: a thread of connection creates copies, as do the indicators. But the shift registers hold data in place.

Norbert

Tags: NI Software

Similar Questions

  • Card network within instances problem

    Hi, NIC are not created inside the deployed instances of the vcac 6.2, am deploy from clone models network profiles are set up correctly and VM becomes nic with correct port group, but I don't see the network adapter that does not have the issues of intellectual property for the Linux and Windows machines inside the virtual machine

    you have specified in the blue print customization scripts?

  • Several networks within the ESX box

    Hi all

    I need to configure two sets (3 mV in each set) of virtual resources such as MV in every game should have its own local network and therefore vms in each set can have the same lan addresses.

    I guess that Vmware Lab Manager has this feature called 'network fencing' that allows to implement this program installation. How such a facility can be created with ESX 3i and VirtuaCenter?

    PS: We can assume that the entity Virtual Router is available by viewing the solution.

    I usually use pfsense but vyatta should be good. I did not use vyatta for a while but I recall it was very configurable.

  • Why so many large updates within a period too short?

    Earlier this year, I think that we just received Version 4. Now we are at Version 7?

    What is fundamentally new is the quick release process. It is a new way of thinking makes software. The basic idea is that you get a lot of small updates instead of a big update each year. See:

    quick release process

    quick release tracking

  • SMB file sharing problem when connecting EA6350 to a larger network.

    Hi all

    I tried to set up a server of media for my colleagues, but have had problems for the last 3 days.  I searched all possible solutions on various forums and have managed to operate, only to discover the next day that he stopped.  I was able to get it working again, but the same problem occurred and stop randomly with additional problems.

    I will now do my best to explain the installation program. Windows 10.

    I have a line entering my room, I don't know where will the line nor can I trace it (I guess to a switch where everyone connects to).  When I connect it dirrectly on my laptop I have an internet connection.

    My ethernet card is set to automatically get IP & DNS.

    I'm affected: IP: 192.168.68.231 DOOR: 192.168.68.254 subnet: 255.255.255.128 DNS: 8.8.8.8

    I bought a Linksys EA6350 set up sharing of media files with a hard drive plugged into the USB port on the router.

    I plug in the bathroom line to the WAN port on the router and a cable from my laptop to the Router 1 LAN port and still have web connectivity.  The problem is that no one can access my shared SMB drive since it is on IP:192.168.1.1 and all the other computers are on IP:192.168.68. ***

    My router IPv4 connection report is: Auto DHCP, subnet: 255.255.255.128 DOOR: 192.168.68.254, IP:192.168.68.242, DNS:8.8.8.8

    I can't to ping other computers in the range * 192.168.68 my laptop and routers ping function.  The firewall of the router is turned off to allow them to connect. But, still no access for someone else on the shared drive because it is IP:192.168.1.1

    The way I could make it work until it stopped working randomly the day after was by pluging the line room in LAN 2 port, LAN 1 port is connected to the laptop.  The value of my computer laptop ethernet static with these values: IP: 192.168.68.231 DOOR: 192.168.68.254 subnet: 255.255.255.128 DNS: 8.8.8.8 and changed the configuration in the router for what is in the pictures.

    It worked.  I had an internet connection, and people were able to copy movies on the shared drive.  Then it just stops the next day.  The router was no longer able to ping any, but my laptop couldn't yet.  The list of devices on my router tab showed all was connected on the subnet 192.168.68 * but that's all she could do.  I have everything reset, went through the same procedures and then a day later it worked just (if I remember correctly, I've changed the "type of internet connection" on the automatic router to "DHCP").  Only to stop again but this time cut of my Internet connection of laptops until I put the ethernet adapter to obtain automatically IP address and DNS.

    I ran out of ideas runs take the router out of the equation and the pluging directly on my laptop HD and share it from there.

    Any assistance that can be provided would be greatly appreciated, thank you.

    You give the router specified a wrong IP address for the subnet mask of 255.255.255.128.

    Valid IP addresses for this subnet is 192.168.68.2 - 192.168.68.127.

  • Transfer of large files on home network freezes and stop the transfer

    I have a HP Desktop running Windows 7 and laptop HP on Vista 64-bit. I have two networked computers on a home network with a 3Com network 10/100 16-port switch.  When I try to transfer files greater than approximately 2.5 gigabytes between two PCs, file transfer will hang and stop after about 2.5 gigabits. Below the size of this file, generally no problem, the transfer ends. The two PCs have file sharing turned on and as mentioned on any file less than 2.5 gigabits transfer / very well.  Is there some sort of transfer of files, size limit on Windows Vista and 7 OS?  Are there settings that I can change to allow to transfer large files? I got an old Sony PC running Windows XP and I could transfer files more than 2.5 gibabits to my storage device shared networked home without any problem.  But under Vista and 7 OS, even once, I can't transfer any file more 2.5 gigabits to my home network shared storage device.  Anyone has any ideas how to solve this problem? Thank you. NEOhio123

    I fixed this problem on my laptop running Windows Vista 64 bit. I remembered that first of all, this started occurring after that I used the IOLO System Mechanic 9 network optimization tool to optimize the settings of my network on my laptop.  So I ran the cancellation on my Windows Vista laptop, and now the laptop with Vista will once more to transfer large files. If a note to all of you who use System Mechanic... do not function of optimization of the network on a Vista PC tool run... .or if you wash and start experiencing problems of transfer of large files... run the cancel this function and rebooting.  You should be able to transfer large files again. I just sent IOLO an email to warn of this problem with the optimization tool of the network within their product of System Mechanic 9.

    UNFORTUNATELY, my new desktop computer running that Windows 7 has still this problem , it stops file transfers after about 2.5 gigabits are sent to my device of storage attached to the network or the laptop. I learned that this seems to be a problem in a way. I can pull large files of my storage device, network or laptop, I can not just to transfer large files to these devices with the Windows 7 desktop. So if anyone has any ideas of how to resolve this problem of transferring large files with Windows 7, I would appreciate your insight.
    NEOhio123

  • Error during talk on network

    Hey guys,.

    I was using two cameras basler to make the acquisition of the vision and worked well the last two months so that in development, but I have now started to deploy on two other machines in the workplace and have plugged into the network, I can ick up cameras, but I can't acquire images, he told me that the camera did not receive a test package test package size may be too large for the network configuration or firewall is enabled. size of rescue my test was 4000. I haven't changed any settings so I'm puzzled as to why now it does not work. The firewall is still disabled. Any suggestions welcome

    Damien

    Hi Damien,.

    If you are now connectong the cameras on a corporate network rather directly, it is likely that you hit problems with frames jumbo (> 1500 bytes) not passed through the network infrastructure. Extended frames are not standard and most of the network equipment disables by default, if it even support it at all.

    First of all, I suggest to try to reduce the packet size to 1500 bytes and see if that fixes the problem. If so, then you know that it is related to the size of package and not something else like firewalls. Then you can perhaps speak with your network administrator and see if there is some way that frames can be activated on your network for better performance of GigE Vision.

    Eric

  • VPN access to the not directly connected networks

    Hello

    I have a 5510 which is used for Client VPN access and there is something simple that I can't work.

    The VPN part works very well with AAA on a CBS.

    But what does not is access to networks that are not directly connected to the inside interface.

    That is to say the VPN users can connect to the network within the Interface (say 192.168.0.0/24) but not a 10.0.0.0/8 network which is connected through 192.168.0.1 router.

    I have the static routes in Routing and firewall all showing the way back to the firewall on all the other networks, but I don't get more far the 192.168.0.1 router...

    I use split tunneling and pass all of the private over the VPN - internet networks is used through the own local access to clients.

    Can someone help me out here?

    Thank you.

    Fraser

    PS: have the same type of access on a 7206VXR and soft, everything can be consulted and which is necessary - but I would like to move this service to the ASA.

    Fraser

    I don't understand the ASDM parts as you suggest. The code would be great.

    I would also recommend control ACL applied to the inside interface (if any) that it allows traffic as

    inside_access_in list of permitted access 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 vpnsubnet vpnnetmask

    If still no joy, attach your config sanitized, would be useful for me to diagnose.

    Concerning

  • My Network blackBerry smartphones is constantly changing! Help, please!

    From 3 to 4 weeks, my phone will pass between the networks.  It will show GSM, edge, EDGE, 3G, 3g and sometimes even SOS.  I have no idea why he keeps it doing.  And it switches between each of the connections within minutes of each other.  Also does it only when I'm at home and on the floor of my house.  I called AT & T, my provider, and they did a kind of software change, my phone to connect to a different and closer Tower, but I still have the same problem.

    Someone at - it ideas?

    Thank you very much!

    What version of the operating system you have installed? Check under Options | Everything. If it is less than 4.6.0.297, Itry retry the upgrade to this version. That and the previous version added a choice for network selection mode.

    If you do not have this version, go in manage connections | Try to change your mode of 2G and 3G network and mobile network options. See if that makes a difference

  • Windows 7 loses access to the network share when unplug wired connection

    With my laptop Windows 7 Pro (64-bit SP1;) docked and thus have wired network (within a domain), I can access shares network very well. A wireless connection is active at the same time. When I detach, Windows Explorer and Office applications get upset some of the time. In addition, this is the case when I anchor. He didn't there has no problem opening a file on the network share when I'm rooted or not anchored, but the transition is not well. Windows launches the error code 0 x 80070035, Windows cannot access , the network path was not found. When it is connected to our wireless network, the machine name is altered by an additional letter. The latter has led to a problem that had to be cleared up by a patch installed by my system administrator, but the problem persisted.

    I understand that Windows 7 should be smart enough to pass interfaces for network access, having a preference for a wiring if it is available (perhaps even the connection data rate). Maybe it's too much to expect that the operating system could make this transition, but it seemed that my Vista laptop has done very well. Any suggestions are welcome.

    Thank you.

    Hello

    Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in forum Windows 7 networking . You can follow the link to your question:

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads

  • ESXi Network Setup?

    Hi people

    I have a question for you guys, maybe it's "s too bad for you, but I am quite unsure of what follows. If I have an ESXi server with an edge quadport NIC and I have a Cisco switch with spanning tree active what happens when I:

    Set all 4 ports on the switch, create a vSwitch standard on the ESXi and attach all 4 cards active network with political LB "based on the original Port ID.

    Based on my understanding he will distribute all my virtual machines in all of these NICs attached and all virtual machines are able to communicate (send AND receive) through these 4 vNIC/NICs. There are toggled a virtual machine which is pinned to a VNIC to an another VNIC when I unplug the specific cable.

    BUT

    My colleagues told me NOT! You will only be able to send data on all cards, but receive vNIC alone due to the MAC source/destination of the virtual machines respectively address the NIC in the host.

    Is this true? Exactelly what this policy process "origin port ID". Because there is additional one called "Mac-based..".

    Often, we set up systems like this:

    A server has 2 x quad port NIC. There is a vswitch with 2 cards attached (initially 1, first on a 2nd map) and we set up "based on the source port ID. Further we do NOT set a battery or an Etherchanne on switches connected to the NICs (via cross).

    We want to only have simpe LB and failover in the event of a path failure. It will work correctly (sending and receiving)? My colleagues told me that will not work as long as the switches are not stacked? Why should it not? My understanding of the VM switch vNIC another that is connected to an another NIC which even once, is connected to another standalone switch.

    When the wenn must configure "based MAC" or "HASH IP"? Well, I know when configuring "IP pole" then you must implement an Etherchannel between the host and the switch and set the IP hash strategy or you do not have the additional bandwidth.

    Why would we need to assign adapters Eve and not active? Which is used to deny the problems with loops in an environment no spanning tree?

    How to configure the network (amount of NIC, vSwitches, portgroup assignment, vmotion, etc. and switches)?

    Thank you very much

    What happens when I:

    Set all 4 ports on the switch, create a vSwitch standard on the ESXi and attach all 4 cards active network with political LB "based on the original Port ID.

    Based on my understanding he will distribute all my virtual machines in all of these NICs attached and all virtual machines are able to communicate (send AND receive) through these 4 vNIC/NICs. There are toggled a virtual machine which is pinned to a VNIC to an another VNIC when I unplug the specific cable.

    BUT

    My colleagues told me NOT! You will only be able to send data on all cards, but receive vNIC alone due to the MAC source/destination of the virtual machines respectively address the NIC in the host.

    Is this true? Exactelly what this policy process "origin port ID". Because there is additional one called "Mac-based..".

    It is quite simple, in the default configuration of "based on the original ID Port" each vNIC a VM has only a single active physical uplink at some point in time. This physical NETWORK adapter is used by the host to send as well as receive traffic for this particular vNIC (because your physical switch will learn the VM vNIC MAC on the currently active port only will pass the traffic through this link).

    The distribution is static and only changes when you add/remove/connect/disconnect rising physics or the vNIC (power/power on, disconnect/connect the vNIC). The behavior is the same for the standard vSwitches but also distributed with this policy. You can see the current mapping in the sight of esxtop (r) network:

    The route in source option MAC hash function is very similar, but instead of using the internal ID virtual port, it establishes a static mapping based on the MAC address of an Ethernet frame transmitted by a vNIC source. This approach also maintains a static table of MAC on your physical switch to prevent the beating of MAC. A unique vNIC VM traffic will use several ports, if the virtual machine uses several source MAC addresses. Who should never usually happen unless you do some fancy stuff of networking within the virtual machine and multiple virtual interfaces and it means also you must allow forged passes and MAC changes in security of port vSwitch group options. This article summarizes very well:

    Hostile coding: VMware: MAC LB hash function

    A server has 2 x quad port NIC. There is a vswitch with 2 cards attached (initially 1, first on a 2nd map) and we set up "based on the source port ID. Further we do NOT set a battery or an Etherchanne on switches connected to the NICs (via cross).

    We want to only have simpe LB and failover in the event of a path failure. It will work correctly (sending and receiving)? My colleagues told me that will not work as long as the switches are not stacked? Why should it not? My understanding of the VM switch vNIC another that is connected to an another NIC which even once, is connected to another standalone switch.

    Your colleague is wrong, you don't need any special configuration to the ID load balancing mechanism base port. It will work very well with the recovery, due to the static mapping simple explained above. It will be just like plugging a system of one switch on the other (in the same broadcast domain).

    When the wenn must configure "based MAC" or "HASH IP"? Well, I know when configuring "IP pole" then you must implement an Etherchannel between the host and the switch and set the IP hash strategy or you do not have the additional bandwidth.

    MAC based transmission is also static, but based on the source MAC and has nothing to do with etherchannel/LACP. See my explanation and article above.

    Why would we need to assign adapters Eve and not active? Which is used to deny the problems with loops in an environment no spanning tree?

    vSwitches form loops unless you do really bad things in a VM with multiple network cards to configure some ornithology within this VM operating system. The active settings / standby are basically just primary/secondary hierarchy in case you want the traffic to a group of particular port through a specific binding, unless a failover occurs.

    How to configure the network (amount of NIC, vSwitches, portgroup assignment, vmotion, etc. and switches)?

    Depends on. On a lot of factors.

    To summarize:

    -separate your network with VLAN slipped into a totally physical configuration

    -vMotion put on a non-routed private VLAN with a dedicated physical connection (or active / standby time of team settings ensure vMotion is not shared with other traffic except in a case of failover)

    -use physical rising as much as you want for a bandwidth

    -for IP (NFS, iSCSI) storage or FT, use dedicated as well physical uplink

  • Quenstion fast VM network on ESXi5


    Hi all

    I am bit confused traffic network within the same esxi host, vm

    We have 3 ESXi5 and each of the ESXi5 has 1 vswitch and 5 groups of ports vm for VMs on this vswitch networks, each vm network has VLANs on that... so if 2 vm is on a vlan different, but on the same ESXi will network traffic will pass throught rising or not? I believe that traffic will increase to uplinks, I'm just on this?

    I know not for sure about network traffic because same subnet / vlan between virtual machines on the same host does not use uplinks

    Traffic will be via the uplink here in the case of vlan for the virtual machines on the same vSwitch

  • Problem with WiFi network

    Hi, whenever I wake my macbook the next day he fails to connect to my wifi network (what I used perfectly fine the day before).

    I then start the wizard in Network preferences, and begins to work very well, not even to enter the network password, it is saved.

    Any ideas how I can fix this problem?

    Thank you!

    You can give your Mac networks less to evaluate to do by reducing the list of potential networks to one.

    Check this box:

    in the next pane, delete everything except your large network. Ruthlessly, delete ALL others using the [---] button:

    .

  • Adding multiple Airport Express to a router/network Apple no?

    Hi all

    You are looking for assistance.

    Until yesterday, I had an Internet ADSL connection and home network WiFi connection that consisted of a base no routing modem, connected to a time Capsule. The extended wireless network had 3 Airport Express connected.

    My ISP (TPG in Australia) past my ADSL to the new NBN yesterday and have sent me a new HUAWEI Modem/wireless router. That's why I need is no longer my Time Capsule for routing.

    My question is now; Can I connect my A-Express to the router not Apple to create a large network similar to what I had before? I did a little reading and apparently not!

    Thanks in advance.

    Can I connect my A-Express to the router not Apple to create a large network similar to what I had before?

    Sorry, but no.  Feature of "extend" Apple owns. The Express devices can only wireless "extend" the signal from another router from Apple.

    You can still use the time Capsule to provide a network... wireless signal and the expresses may 'extend '.

    You could use the wireless of the Huawei product for "guest", or disable wireless on the device if you do not need two wireless networks.

  • Toshiba stor.e connection of wireless network card

    Hello. I bought the stor.e wireless adapter and I am totally disappointed. I was expecting to connect to my WiFi router and then I could access it as a network within my normal system drive.

    Unfortunately, it creates its own wifi network and devices need to connect directly to the adapter for access. This makes the camera useless for me, because I wanted to access my files on my local network far enough away where the adapter signal does not reach.

    Is it possible to make it to fix on my local network and I can access it from there?

    A second problem is that the Android on 5 Android app does NOT work. 4.4, I can see the files, on 5 I can't.

    Totally threw the money. If these problems not corrected soon I would not recommend this product or anything affiliated with someone I know.

    The STOR. E wireless adapter can be used as part of an external HDD or SSD hard drive.
    It supports hard disks up to 2 TB, and it allows you to access the data stored on the HARD drive using the Android app.
    This is the main function of this STOR. E wireless adapter.

    You can also map the card wifi as a network drive in Windows system.

    In Explorer types:
    198.168.65.1. then right click and choose map network drive.
    In a new window, select the application letter to the new drive (Z) and click the Finish button.

Maybe you are looking for