Ports per ASIC on a 2232PP

Similar Questions

• Protect nest wants several ports per device IP address

  Hi all

  Rather a strange this...

  I have 4 x nest protect smoke alarms or fire.  All seem to work properly and talk to each other.  I THINK (but I'm not sure) that they connect to nest/Google Internet because the software was getting updated.  So I do know that I have a problem to solve...

  I have configured each of them to have a static IP, and I put the port forwarding for each IP address to have Public and private TCP and UDP ports 80 for device 1, 443 for camera 2, 9543 for unit 3 and 11095 for unit 4.  These port numbers were given to me by the support of nest.

  BUT - when I asked for confirmation that these four setting was correct, I received this statement:

  I understand that you have assigned port 80 of your first protection, 443 to your second Protect and 9543 for your third Protect (or a variant of it).

  Please forgive me for not giving you a complete example of what you need to do before that. As I said in the paragraph above, all ports apply to all devices.

  So if your static IP address for your 1st Protect is 192.168.1.10 will be assigned TCP + UDP 80, TCP + UDP 443, 9543 TCP + UDP and TCP + UDP 11095 to it.

  You must then do exactly the same for the following 3 nest protects you have. Thank you this is a bit tedious, but I assure you there is no additional configuration required for this.

  How is it possible to assign 4 ports on a static address of P?  When I asked this with the assistance of the nest, the response was "I'm really sorry to say this, but it was already not my support framework to help you as I have with the router I was using personal knowledge of port forwarding and hoped that it would be possible for you to apply my instructions using the provided Apple of instructions that I shared with you"

  Ideas anyone?  Or should I just leave it alone because it wouldn't even be a problem to solve?

  
  

  So if your static IP address for your 1st Protect is 192.168.1.10 will be assigned TCP + UDP 80, TCP + UDP 443, 9543 TCP + UDP and TCP + UDP 11095 to it.

  You must then do exactly the same for the following 3 nest protects you have. Thank you this is a bit tedious, but I assure you there is no additional configuration required for this.

  How is it possible to assign 4 ports on a static address of P?

  To assign multiple ports to a single static IP address, just enter each required port followed by a comma, for example:

  Public or TCP ports: 80, 443, 9543, 11095

  Public or UDP ports: 80, 443, 9543, 11095

  However, you cannot assign the same ports for multiple static IP addresses.

• Configuring the additional server ports

  Hi, if I use 2 ports per chassis of the server and want to add another 2, in addition to plug the cables and the settings, on the interconnection ports to "Set up as a Server Port" y at - it something else which is necessary and there is no interruption of traffic?

  Hello David,.

  If the links between IOM and FI server ports are individual links, then you will recognize the chassis to initialize the new links. This will cause disturbances of the network for a few seconds.

  There is no need to re - recognize the chassis if there is a channel of port of fabric between the IOM and FI.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.html#concept_5D3D88341BFB43468B62B5A77876C67B

  HTH

  Padma

• Double room Nexus 2348UPQ / Max ports for vPC links

  Hi people,

  Cisco Nexus 2348UPQ has 24 to 10 GB uplink interfaces. Supposedly on the distribution layer, we have a pair of Cisco Nexus 5548UP, how many ports we can group about 2348 for vPC for double-homing links.

  Thank you very much!!!

  Hi Chris,

  Using an Extender of fabric with a Cisco Nexus 5000 and 6000 Series Switch Cisco Nexus

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/nexus2000/HW/installation/guide/nexus_2000_hig/overview.html#pgfId-1415984

  -If you decide to use the drop cable instead of the 40 G uplinks, please note the following limitation:

  The 2348TQ of Cisco Nexus and Nexus 2348UPQ FEX, if a port channel is used to connect a switch parent with a tissue Expander device, the port channels can have up to 8 ports.

  Nexus 2348 FEX devices have a total of 6 * 40 Gigabit Ethernet uplink ports to the parent switch. If these are used with native port of 40G uplinks on a switch of parent, there is no limitation. 6 ports can be used in a hosted configuration only hosted or double. You can also use 40 Gigabit Ethernet uplink ports on the extensor of N2348 fabric with 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports on the switch to parent when it is used with the appropriate wiring. A maximum of 8 ports can be added to the string of port between the parent switch and the fabric Extender. If it's a double hosted configuration, VPC for the extensor of fabric, only 4 ports per switch are allowed in the channel of the port.

  Cisco Nexus 5600 series NX - OS Layer 2 switching Configuration Guide, version 7.x - configuration of the fabric Extender

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/Datacenter/nexus5600/SW/Layer2/7x/b_5600_Layer2_Config_7x/b_6k_Layer2_Config_7x_chapter_01110.html

  -SFP support and cables are listed in the Cisco Nexus 2300 platform fabric Extender card (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/nexus-2000-series-fabric-extenders/datasheet-c78-731663.html).

  I'd be suspicious of this bug;

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuu88175/?reffering_site=dumpcr

  "If it's a double configuration hosted, vpc for fex, that only 4 ports per switch are permitted in the Port-Channel"

  HTH,

  Qiese Sa'di

• Limit media on vcse UDP ports

  Hi there, in a recent deployment of a highway v8.1 my client asked I have limit incoming ports for media on the internet as much as possible. They bought 10 calls of course so I figure it would be 8 dynamic ports per call (for video, audio, and content bfcp/FECC pair). So I reduced the area crossing range ar 80 UDP ports, sufficient to meet a full scenario. However, vcse ceases to throw up errors that State is not enough ports for the authorized number of calls. He falls not complained until I have increase the number in port at around 3000 (I don't remember the exact number). I do not understand why I would need to open a multitude of ports for a maximum of 10 calls from crossing. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks Gurp

  Hi Chris,

  Thanks for the clarification. The VCS-E, I tested, I have 50 licenses covered call. So if VCS - E can use up to 40 ports per license 50 x 40 = 2000.

  I can't configure the VCS-E for 50 000-52001 - the smallest she'd go between 50 000 - 52, 399.

  This would amount to 48 ports per license.

  It would be nice just to get a final clarification on this point.

  Thank you

  David

• replication ports 6 VMkernel vSphere

  Thanks to Jeff Hunter for his recent updates and documentation on vSphere for replication 6.0.  Read the docs online, I have a few questions on the vSphere newly supported, dedicated replication VMkernel profits.

  Here (vSphere replication 6.0 Documentation Center) and here (vSphere replication 6.0 Documentation Center) are notes on configuring the VMkernel ports dedicated to the RV on a source host and RV traffic on a target host (one for the VR traffic and another for VR NFC traffic, respectively).

  Considering that it is probably a common practice to use VR as the replication engine with SRM with the intention to fail on the original production site, what is the value in the configuration of two ports VMkernel for VR?

  On the protected Site, you configure a VR VMkernel port to send traffic.  He sends the replicated data from VM for device of recovery of the RV Site, who turns and sends that data replicated for recovery Site ESXi hosts VR NFC VMkernel ports.

  To not return, then the recovery Site can (should?) have an additional port of VR VMkernel, which sends the data replicated VM for device of original VR protected site, which in turn sends the data replicated to the ports of VR NFS VMkernel from the original host protected Site ESXi.

  This looks like it may or must be a distinction between the traffic between the sites and traffic of VR NFC within a site since there are two types of traffic for VMkernel (VR and VR NFC) VR.

  What is this distinction that guarantees a dedicated RV NFC VMkernel port? Why not just use VR VMkernel port? Thank you!

  Edit: I consider these types of traffic to be at the same level of importance and safety.  I have no problem to put two VMkernel ports in the same VLAN.  If I did this, it would put two VMkernel ports per host, in the same network segment.  I wonder why I don't want to do that rather than just use a single VMkernel port or multiple VLANs.

  Post edited by: Mike Brown

  I think it boils down essentially to the options. you don't have to do that, but based on the reviews, it has been estimated that US aircraft enough requests from customers to provide a mechanism which not only allows you to control the path allows the replication traffic (incoming and outgoing) (the source host and VR target devices), and routes it takes on the network but also control the card used for the VR NFC traffic on the target sites. As you RV relies on the NFC to push the data down to the storage of data target on the target sites and some desired customers be able to separate this circulation as well.

  So in the case of the NFC, you can if you want things together (optional) upwards so that the traffic is storage hosts (and I mean here the hosts VR has determined have access to data target stores) can be sent on a physical LAN separated if you wanted that... and a lot of people have asked that flexibility. Allows customers to isolate the common VR NFC (and traffic pass VR) of management traffic not VR "regular".

  Once VRM note that a host has a vmknic marked as RV NFC, only this address is reported on the VR server, which means when it comes to this host in the future that we will only use this address for traffic from VR NFC.

  just my 2cents on why we did it.

• Create groups of ports from excel

  I have a spreadsheet with 60 groups of ports, that I need to create. My fields are VLAN and name. Looking at the cmdlets reference guide , it seems that the command to create one would be Get-VDSwitch-name 'Boston ' | New-VDPortgroup-name 'test SQL VLAN 250″ - VLanId 250. Can someone help with the structure to create it from an excel file? I'm checking the rate maximum config to see if I hit a limit about my ports with vSphere 5.1 and need to set a number of ports per port group. Thank you.

  Try something like this

  $dvSw = Get-VDSwitch -Name "Boston"
  
  Import-Csv dvPortgroups.csv -UseCulture | %{  New-VDPortgroup -Name $_.PgName -VlanId $_.VLanId -NumPorts $_.Ports -VDSwitch $dvSw}
  

  The CSV file is supposed to have 3 columns

  PgName, VLanId, Ports

  PG1, 100, 32

  PG2, 100, 32

  You can check the number of available ports on the dvSwitch first, to see if you can add he's the ports required for exchanges

• dvswitch outdated ports maxports

  Hello

  I wanted to just know more details on the stats shows the dvswitch summaries page specifically "Total Ports and ports available to the general public, another point I want to make here is that a few days before I was getting error while creating a dvportgroup error says something like this"spec in 8608 exceeded maxPorts 8192 ". I found a vmware KB 1038193 to work around this problem. Before I could solve this problem by using the KB, sometimes I add a few more ESX host for the environment. Later, when I tried to add the port group, I was able to do it without any errors; just to walk, it's because of the addition of new ESX hosts.

  see you soon

  pan1268 wrote:

  In fact we have around 12-15 mV in a port group. And, for more easier how to decrease the number of

  ports in the port group, I mean there will be most likely to cause problems to the VM in the port group.

  I think that you should be able to simply reduce the number of ports in the trade without problems for guests, but I don't have any available Distributed Switch to test this at the moment.

  This VMware KB says nothing of potential problems: http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1010593

  As long as you keep well above the actual number of VMs, it should be good. Say that you decrease the number to 64 ports per portgroup, that leaves plenty of room for future VMs as well as pass under the limit of 4096 for each host port.

• VRTX internal server ports

  I have the impression that I'm going to a painfully obvious answer here but how do I activate more ports for a server blade in a VRTX chassis?

  My two blades have 2 of the 4 active ports.  If I go into the port configuration in the/o GUI module, the other two ports show 'down', but there is no option to raise.

  This makes me think that each blade server would have a setting for how many NIC ports internally it uses, but I can't find such a setting anywhere in the graphical interface of chassis management.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  wardog25

  I have the impression that I'm going to a painfully obvious answer here but how do I activate more ports for a server blade in a VRTX chassis?

  You can not activate more ports. You have only two available ports per node due to IOM/switch you use. The IO module will use only the first two ports on each node. You will need to move than the IOM to allow access to more ports. According to me, the IOM is the only available option that has this port restriction, but I haven't checked all the options available to make sure.

  Thank you

• HA and SAN traffic on dedicated NIC port

  Hello

  We have a small vmware network 2 HP servers and a SAN. We buy ESS Vsphere with HA.

  If I understand correctly, it is considered preferable for HA and SAN traffic on a port on the network adapter.

  What I need is help with how to implement that.

  We will have 2 spare nic per server ports dedicate to this, one for HA and one for SAN traffic.

  Currently, we use 2 ports per server in swarming mode connected to a subnet and two ports more connected to another subnet, for a total of 4 ports per server. We will buy a 6 port of HP network card very soon, it is most important that they do for our DL 365 HP. This will give us the extra 2 ports per server, to devote to SAN and HA traffic.

  OR should we just use the spare ports 2 Teemed in the SAN and forget to devote to the HA.

  Thank you!!!

  Peter

  HA the traffic runs on the service console / management network. It is advisable to separate, but it is not a must. I will say if you don't have enough NIC to use the grouping of network cards to introduce redundancy, it is more important than anything else, when you run HA.

  Duncan

  VMware communities user moderator | VCP | VCDX

  -

• LAG on a PC 3448 issues battery

  I have a stack of 4 PC 3448 of the switch with 20 3424 switch is related to them. I was thinking of setting up some for the redundancy of the LAG / speed for all 3424 switches. 8 GAL with 8 ports per LAG limitation applies to each switch or the battery altogether?

  Here's what I think:

  

  Where the Red would be a LAG on a switch and the blue would be, I don't know yet if it is advisable... any help would be appreciated.

  
  

• Oracle RAC 11 g 2

  Dear gurus,

  I'm relatively new to the RAC clusters and hoped someone could help me out here...

  We have an oracle 11 GR 2 CARS running on a cluster of 3 nodes (all in a case, Cluster of interconnection running on infiniband switches).

  We want to replace the machines running with new ones, also replacing the infiniband with switches passthrough.

  My plan was as follows

  step 1 - MAJ running cluster interconnect with ethernet interface and unloading of infiniband switches

  step 2 - Add the oracle software prepared new nodes or machines to the cluster running

  step 3 - remove the old machines in the cluster (script deletenode)

  Step 4: install switches passthrough and passthrough interface connecting pole shift.

  Is this plan ok? Perhaps a better approach is also possible?

  I also have a few questions for RAC...

  1. travel of the current cluster interconnect with local Interface... I have in total, 2 Ethernet ports per blade both in a single bonded interface, the public network of oracle running here... Can I move the cluster of interconnection on the same servile interface? or am I forced to have another Ethernet port?

  2. everything in preparing the new machines to add to the cluster running, I have to have the SAME GRID and DB version? Or only the same version of GRID?

  -the current versions are 11.2.0.1 for grid and DB. Can I add this group machines that have the same version of grid (11.2.0.1) but a more recent version of the db (11.2.0.3)?

  Thank you

  Saad

  Hello

  You don't need a separate option for dataguard.  If you use Oracle Enterprise Edition, you can use the free dataguard feature.

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28294/standby.htm#i72073

  Oracle Data Guard is available only as a feature of Oracle Database Enterprise Edition. It is not available with Oracle database Standard edition.

  I would not have thought that the GI version would be useful to the dataguard.

  As long you run IG at 11.2.0.3 and the BDD to 11.2.0.1, you should be fine.  You can't physical datagurd through different versions.

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e10700/standby.htm#i72053

  The same version of Oracle Database Enterprise Edition must be installed on the database and all data pending

• CF Storage ALUA, LUN trespassing and some doubts

  Hello!

  First of all thank you all for this great community!

  I'm setting up a cluster of small vSphere 5.5 and everything seems to be ok, but I have my doubts that I want to share. The configuration is the following:

  VMware ESX 5.5u2 with two single HBA Emulex 8 G. (Host_HBA1 and Host_HBA2)

  NetApp E2724 FC 8 G (two ports per controller) dual controller and configuration active theorytically. (Controller1_Port1, Controller1_Port2, Controller2_Port1, Controller2_Port2)

  Two switches from Brocade s300 with single initiator zoning for multiple targets (Switch1: Host_HBA1 Controller1_Port1 and Controller2_Port1 and Switch2: Host_HBA2 Controller1_Port2 and Controller2_Port2)

  Wiring seems to be OK and vSphere detects 4 paths per LUN, defines the driver seat automatically Robin and defines two active paths (e/s) and the other two as Active.

  In the Netapp LUNS are configured as LUN in VMware O.S. (they are Dinamic disk pools Volumes) and TRA seems to be enable for this kind of host.

  Well, I tried different tests (Storage VMotion between different LUNS, VMware IO monitor, create and delete virtual machines...) and everything seems to work smoothly. Strange behavior only I noticed is that when you create the storage system volumes, they are assigned to one or the other controller, and they have a "preferred owner" (ALUA). When, for example, I make a storage VMotion between two data warehouses (I have a store of data by logical unit number) and that LUN have different "privileged" controllers (LUN1 in Controller1 and LUN2 to Controller2) I noticed that the LUN2 is automatically moved to the Controller1. I don't know if this is normal behavior to improve performance or I have some configuration problem (I have a message in the journal of NetApp storage which States: I/O volume shipment implicit transfer and eventually an alarm logic unit number is not in the controller preferred). I guess the multi-channel driver using AVT to send the LUN to the same controller, but as I said, I don't know if this is normal. Would be nice if someone can clarify this point. The Storage VMotion finished well and no disk problem appears.

  Thanks again for your time!

  NetApp's official response is that they are aware of the problem and it will be fixed in a future firmware version.

• Quanti dvportgroup in UN singolo VDS

  Buongiorno non conosco benissimo tecnologia e VDS mi hanno asked quanti port group posso creare in United Nations Virtual distributed switch.

  Work the best practices ho trovato I try generali:

  -The hosts by VDS: 350

  -Total distributed virtual network switch ports: 30 000

  -Total number of static groups Distributed Port: 5000

  -Total number of ephemeral ports groups: 256

  -Welcome the limits: 4096 virtual ports or active virtual port 1016

  Ciao, nel documento ufficiale dei della 5.1 maximums

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vsphere5/R51/vSphere-51-configuration-maximums.PDF

  What valore non c'e, only if di spoke door by DVS:

  Switch ports total virtual network by the host (port VDS and VSS) 4096

  The maximum active ports per host (VDS and VSS) 1050

  Network virtual switch ports per switch standard 4088 creation

  According to the standard port groups spend 256

  Distributed ports by 60000 vCenter virtual network switch

  Groups of static ports by vCenter 10000

  Groups of ephemeral ports by vCenter 256

  Number of hosts by VDS 500

  Switches distributed by vCenter 128

  SE invece di una 5.5 parli, he e questo documento:

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vsphere5/R55/vSphere-55-configuration-maximums.PDF

  e that it valore che cerchi e invece defined:

  Groups of static/dynamic port by switch distributed 6500

  Hai una ibm_db Dove rischi di mio questi try, o e by knowledge?

  Luca.

• SCSI reservations esx 5

  Hello

  We have a project with 48x900gb sas hus.migration hitachi virtual machines of the old storage from hitachi.

  There are 100 computers a virtual especially windows 7, some esx host of linux.5 by fibre channel switch and storage and ISL connected with other 5 hosts and other storage containers.

  Because the disc is too big I think for a mix of raid 5 7 + 1 and 2 raid 10 raid in 2 pools of hitachi groups, large stripping.

  but when I present too big lun in esx will be a problem of reserves scsi? or is it only when I have too much intensive vms in a data store? I want to keep 1 lun = 2 data warehouses.

  Hitachi has 2 LUNS of controllers.all I have will present 2 ports to each controller or is better one port per controller? each esx should see tha luns.is even it correct as implementation? its my first project and I don't have too much experience.

  johnxgr wrote:

  I wanted to say the following.

  due to the large drives and when I'll build raid 5 lun will be big.generally will be a problem to present to esx 5 TB as a data store?

  ESXi 5 it can withstand without problem.

  or is better to split in two?

  Possibility - you should consider that a single LUN has only a single queue, which may present a problem of system.

  make sense that due to scsi reservations?

  There is no reserve of SCSI.

  In rule General when I shared a lun and in each one I have VM the queue is one.for perfomance reasons plays no role to divide?

  Queues absolutely make a difference.

  and vaai in hitachi works when I have a pool of raid groups and with the selection broad stripping activated?

  You must ask Hitachi who.