RV082 static routing

Similar Questions

• Call for Experts / RV082:set routing to link dedicated

  HI all!

  I need to help you know where I can find guides/info/post/examples on how to set a link dedicated to my RV082. Let me explain my problem:

  This link is a frame relay that provides the connection to SAP and other http external Internet services, the link is connected without additional parameters to a the RV082 LAN port and this link does not provide any Internet or e-mail. For users to access this link at the moment they change the IP address of their machines automatic DHCP option to any network dedicated link address more the connection default gateway when they need to access the SAP and other services and later to change again on automatic DHCP when finished consulting SAP.

  On the other side, the internet is provided by a cable modem and a LILY that use ports WAN1 and WAN2.

  What should I do? : that my users can access the link and internet at the same time without changing the IP address or by adding tables of routing on the Pc, nor do not cause failures on surfing the internet avoiding the Pc seems internet or send e-mails by private line. I have no idea on the right located on the router for ccomplish this. How can you help me? It is possible with RV082 do this?

  Thank you! NfDr1979!

  I can't guess what that "suggestions have not worked" really means.

  The works of 'double-sided configuration', I'm sure of that, there is nothing unusual in this type of configuration.  My guess is that the other side doesn't want to define static routes on their front door, or did he not yet tryied.

  The configuration of "biased" is delicate and should be specific, 'variations' mess only things up.  I agree that RV is perhaps not able to take the necessary steps from, in fact an option I used it to add a cheap router that can do the job, and I mean really cheap, I use a US$ 25. Motorola with updated firmware (DD - WRT) do the NATing source on an Intranet (so the other side sees everything coming from the network they we assigned to you, and I don't have to make any changes on my network, other that define static routes and cheap router configuration of course).

  If you want to close the message, no problem, it's your choice.

• Static route / network Configuration?

  I have a cable modem that connects via Ethernet (eth0) of a configuration for NAT and Firewall Linux box.  Another card (eth1) connects to a switch for my cable network (192.168.1.1/24).  I added a third adapter (eth2 - 192.168.2.1/24) which is connected to a M20 (192.168.2.2).  The server DHCP M20 has been implemented to serve the 192.168.3.1/24 network.

  Is there a configuration more simple than that?

  Problems reported with the current configuration:

  (1) I think the M20 NAT function must be disabled because the Linux machine is.  However, disable NAT causes machines on 192.168.3 bad connection to the internet.

  (2) I want the machines wirelessly on 192.168.3 to see shared windows on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  Currently they do not see each other.  If I remove M20 and plug a PC eth2 and set as 192.168.2.2, this machine can see actions on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  I think a static route must be set on the M20 so that he knows what to do with traffic to 192.168.1.  However, I don't properly because he always tells me I have an invalid route when I try to enter.

  (3) is there one another device other than on the M20 motorway which would better suit my needs (adding a wireless to my private/internal network segment)?

  Kind regards

  Case No.

  OK, I just saw the previous thread on this question pop up on the first page,

  Valet parking can be defined as an access point only?

  I'll try the posted instructions here.

• Static routing LRT214 does not

  Hello

  I have a hard time with a static routing on LRT214.

  My configuration:

  * LRT214 (recently purchased), acting as a gateway to the internet, local subnet is 192.168.28.0/24

  * There is a local VPN (192.168.28.98) server on the local network, serving a LAN tunnel with subnet 192.168.29.0/24. on LRT214 port forwarding is configured

  I can connect to my VPN server on the internet, and I can access the machine running on the VPN server (for example via ssh).

  However, I can not connect to any other computer on my LAN, although I tried

  adding another subnet under Configuration > network > LAN settings

  * setting up a static route under Setup > Advanced Routing (kind of route add - net 192.168.29.0/24 gw 192.168.28.98)

  of course, when I add the itinerary of statitc over any computer on the local network, I can connect via VPN tunnel to the machine, so its clearly a problem of LRT214.

  Please help, how can I configure a static route for this scenario in the user Web interface?

  The SPI Firewall, intercept traffic.

  As far as I understand, it could be that when the VPN server sends data to another machine on the local network, this happens on layer 2 (where the SPI Firewall not listening), while the return on the VPN server traffic is routed higher up in the stack, where the SPI listening and intercept.

  So, I will use the above workarounds, or put the OpenVPN server on a different subnet or VLAN, which I do anyway. I tried a basic configuration of VLAN yesterday (just put the Server full VPN with all interfaces in one VLAN separated), with InterVLAN routing enabled, but there seems to be some particularities with it (like the ping works, but not ssh). In any case, it's another story. Thanks for you support.

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• Connecting two routers via a static route

  I have a relatively simple configuration involving a Wireless-N Router and a wireless-B router (several years).  The N wireless router is connected to the internet (via DSL modem) and accepts several DHCP clients without problem.  Wireless - b router is connected to the Wireless-N router.  To do this, I connected the WAN port on the router wireless - b to a port on the router Wireless N ethernet (did not use the uplink). I have a PC connected to the router wireless - b, so I want him to be able to hit the internet, but also be accessible to DHCP clients on the Wireless N router.  The PC connects to the internet successfully, but it does not find clients on the network supported by the Wireless-N router.  It's about my setup:

  B 192.168.55.1 wireless router (LAN) 192.168.56.102 (WAN)

  PC 192.168.55.10 (active dhcp)

  Wireless N 192.168.56.1 (LAN) x.x.x.x (internet)

  (several clients dhcp... 192.168.56.100...)

  I've added a static route in the hope that a computer on the network of the Wireless N router would be able to hit the PC, but nothing helped. I've added a static route as such, on the Wireless-N router, which was the only way that that would enable the web interface:

  Destination LAN 192.168.55.0

  Subnet mask 255.255.255.0

  Gateway 192.168.56.102

  I tried to place the router without wireless - B gateway mode, then router and changed mode, then return.  I can connect to the web interface of the router wireless - b from the PC, and I can connect to the internet from the PC.  Also, the PC is able to reach customers on Wireless N, but the reverse is not true, i.e. clients on Wireless N can't find clients on the wireless - B network. Also, I turned on the port forwarding on the router wireless - B so that it points to the PC, in the hope he would lead all traffic to the PC, but still cannot access PC.  How to configure both routers (or both set up as access point?) so that clients on the Wireless N Router can talk to customers on the wireless router - B?  For now, all customers are on DHCP, but finally, I would like to create static entries for at least two or three of them.

  Thanks in advance

  Are Linksys routers teas? If so what model is router B? It may not supported for a DHCP client port forwarding. Even if you can get the port forwarding to work for a client on router B, it will not work for several clients.

  In addition, if you have the option in router B, disable the SPI Firewall. It is the cause of the problem, in my opinion. If you do this, you should port forward.

  Is there a reason that you connect the routers via the WAN port on the router B? You could uplink using an ethernet port on the B to an ethernet port on the N and avoid all this... You can always configure router B as a point of wireless access for specific customers.

• Add a static route to a RV042

  I have configured the RV042 dual WAN port for backup smart link connected to two different ISPS.  The subnet behind this is 192.168.2.xxx.  I have a second router linksys Garland with the 192.168.2.250 WAN port and subnet behind it is 192.168.20.xxx.  My problem is that I have a not able to route traffic fron 192.168.2.xxx to 192.168.20.xxx.  How can I add a static route so that clients on 192.168.2.xxx can access resources on 192.168.20.xxx?

  1. the second Linksys router must be changed of gateway (active NAT) in router mode (NAT disabled) mode. With NAT the LAN behind the second Linksys will be not accessible from the outside unless you configure port forwarding.

  2. on the RV042 set up a static route for the subnet 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 to the gateway IP address 1921.68.2.250 on the LAN interface.

  3. Ideally, you must configure the same static route on all clients connected to the RV042. If you don't want to do this, you must configure the firewall on all clients on the RV042 accept ICMP redirect messages. This is important because otherwise all traffic from 192.168.2. * to * 192.168.20 would be sent to the RV042 and from there to the second Linksys that is unnecessary and could create a bottleneck.

• Static routing question

  I just took a WRT610N and configure a few static routes for my network.

  I have the router connected to a cable modem WAN and the interface of local network connected to my LAN via 192.168.0.1.

  I have three other LAN subnets in a test environment, they are:-

  172.16.0.0/24

  172.16.100.0/24

  172.16.200.0/24

  I tried to add the following to the first subnet:

  Destination = 172.16.0.0 LAN IP address

  Subnet mask = 255.255.255.0

  Gateway = 172.16.0.1

  Interface = LAN

  No matter what I try, I get a message saying route static invalid, and I can't get anything to stick.  Everyone can't see what I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you guys!

  Gary

  The IP address of the gateway in a static route is the IP address of the connected device directly on each side of the router, either on the ethernet LAN or WAN side.

  In particular you cannot route a subnet of an IP address of the gateway inside the target IP subnet. The static route example you deposited directions where to send traffic destined to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0. It is impossible to set the address of the gateway as 172.16.0.1 because the router doesn't know where to send the traffic to 172.16.0.1.

  In other words, the IP address of the gateway must in most cases be a 192.168.0. * IP address that you use these IP addresses in the local network of the WRT. The IP address of the gateway should be the IP address of the router on the subnet specific target within your local network.

  For example, if your second router with address 172.16.0.1/255.255.255.0 IP LAN has an IP 192.168.0.2, then the 192.168.0.2 is the IP address of the gateway for the static route to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0.

• Remove the static route by default

  Hello

  I have a switch L3 which has a static default route pointing to a FW that is connected to a circuit of the Internet. The same L3 switch made EIGRP routers on our MPLS network. If this default static route disappears EIGRP will inject a default route, and users will receive their Internet traffic through the MPLS cloud as a backup.

  My question is how to remove this static road by default with a mechanism that is unique on the Internet circuit. I can't count on line protocol because it almost never goes down. I can't rely on Internet ping IP SLA addresses because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop of the SLA of intellectual property.

  I wish I could do BGP with the Internet provider but this circuit is in a country where it would be difficult.

  Any ideas on how to remove this default static route based on something that is unique to this tour of the Internet.

  Thank you

  P.

  "I can't rely on Internet addresses ping IP SLA because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop IP SLA."

  To remedy this situation, you must add a route with the 'permanent' switch at the end of any IP you track on your IPSLA... In this way, if this interface is down, your ping IPSLA would stop and IPSLA would be the move and change your default route.

  Example:

  Route IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 Permanent

  where 1.1.1.1 is the IP address, you are followed and 2.2.2.2 is your 'usual' default gateway

• Redistribution of static routes in OSPF

  Hi all

  It seems that the static routes can still live even if the designated interface went down.

  I added a description for this problem file.

  Stephen,

  I don't know why the distribution list did not work. Did you include the permit all at the end of the access list? Without it, you wouldn't get the external routes, as you journey.

  I have just re-read the documentation for the ip route, 12.2 and 12.4, ' cos I wasn't aware of the useful form of the command that Rick suggested. Here is an excerpt:

  Specifying a next digital jump which is on a directly connected interface will prevent the router to use Proxy ARP. However, if the next hop interface breaks down and the digital next hop can be reached by a recursive route, you can specify hop and the following interface (for example "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet1/2 10.1.2.3") with a static route to avoid the roads pass through an unintentional interface.

  Which describes your problem exactly, I think. He comes:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca75a.html#wp1018065

  Therefore, the interface specification that force the static route to use only a local next hop.

  Kevin Dorrell

  Luxembourg

• By default static route with recevied BGP default route

  Hi guys;

  I have a problem and I don't know how to find or solve it.

  My chart is attached, please check everything first.

  Secondly, I have a multihomed BGP with two Internet service providers, I received two ISPS via BGP default route.

  Now, I have two types of IP addresses as follows:

  1 - my own prifixes, who has recorded with my ACE

  2 - iPs purchased ISP2.

  I have two networks, the first will contain my own prefixes and second will contain my prifixes ISP2. so I have to go on the internet, static route by default to the ISP2 need and that's fine, now the problem that carry the second defect I received two ISPS in routing however my table if I show ip bgp I see that I received it, but because of favorite and distancing China he disappear the default road statistics.

  so now a network is already online and the second network that contain my own IPs is out of service, of course this second network I need to routed to my isps1 via bgp and when isps1 down, go through ISP2 and I do using weight and as path prefix.

  Thank you

  Hi Nathan,

  With ACB option, you config-route map is your own prefix and set its next hop ISP 1 and 2 PSI when ISP 1 IP is not accessible. Apply the road map to interface with Network1. ACB is processed before routing.

  With option VRF, put the Network1 interface and isps1 VRF1, so it will have separate routing table. Under the vrf1 you static default config with higher AD and the next hop pointing to ISP2 in the global routing table. This will be used when you lose by default isps1. Because separate ridges VRF table routing, so netwoek1 will use the default route in vrf1 to isps1 as primary, the Network2 use ISP2.

  HTH,
  Lei Tian

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Removing static route get % corresponding to any error no route to remove

  I'm trying to remove a static route, I added:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 #show ip route
  Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

  Gateway of last resort is not set

  172.168.0.0/29 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  S 172.168.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.2
  C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
  192.168.2.0/30 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
  R2 #conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  R2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
  % Corresponding to any no route to remove
  R2 (config) #r2 #show ip route

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I was training establishment of a static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1 (2600xm) via maps module T1 on the serial ports. connected to r1 is a router 2500 old called PC.

  I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 I connect to 2500 another console cable that I use to access a server I get the above error.  all IP addresses are just generic subnets that I created to play with static routing.   I can't remove someone has any ideas?

  you use the subnet mask different than the one you used. According to the route table entry mask is 29

  Try this,

  1] r2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.248 192.168.2.2

  or 2] another easy method would be to check the working config and copy stick with 'no' at the beginning.

  See the race | include the ip route

  Copy the static route statement and paste this what with 'no' in the global configuration and check the routing table.

• The scenario that is balanced with two static routes without remote administration.

  Hello

  I'm setting up a switch 3750 PSI using MHSRP provider on the side. In fact I use two GigaEthernet connections.

  I want to create my side by using the static routes of load balancing, but traffic flows that I see are not identical or similar.

  See the router # running | Start iproute

  [...]

  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.1
  IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.6

  [...]

  Router # show ip route

  [...]
  S * 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.0.254
  10.0.0.0/16 is variably divided into subnets, subnets 23, 5 masks
  10.0.0.0/16 S [1/0] via 10.255.255.6
  [1/0] via 10.255.255.1

  [...]

  Either way, ip cef is already activated

  Here is the result:

  Interface 1

  GigabitEthernet1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)

  [...]

  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 35046000 bps, 4638 packets/s
  5 minute output rate 8671000 bps, 3846 packets/s

  Interface 2

  GigabitEthernet2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
  [...]
  Strategy of queues: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 1000 bps, 2 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 3859000 bps, 1714 packets/s

  IP CEF:

  router ip cef #show
  Interface of the jump following the prefix
  10.0.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 Vlan99
  10.255.255.6 Vlan99

  I have no configuration is no longer on the interfaces. I would add the ip per instruction packet load balancing?

  By default cef uses per load balancing destination, set ip load balancing by package on the concert links try again, are your equal to up to 10 links network on each side

• Static route ISA570W to Comcast gateway/modem

  In my view, that it is a question of static route.

  I want to be able to connect to the gateway/Modem Comcast (10.1.10.1) using any computer on my network. Currently, I am unable to do this, I am also unable to ping the unit of Comcast. Here's my setup.

  Comcast device (SMC8014)

  WAN IP: 50.x.x.238

  LAN IP: 10.1.10.1 (255.255.255.0)

  A single cable CAT5E for:

  ISA570W (WAN Port) - (basic out-of-the-box configuration, 1 - WAN, DMZ - 1, 8 - LAN Ports)

  WAN STATIC Port info:

  IP WAN: 50.x.x.233 bridge (255.255.254.0): 50.x.x.238

  LAN IP: 10.1.10.2 (255.255.255.0)

  DHCP enabled for bridge VLAN-1 (10.1.10.30 - 99) by default: 10.1.10.2

  A single cable CAT5E for:

  Cisco SG200 - 50 p (POE switch to serve as a connection for phones and desktop computers)

  LAN IP: 10.1.10.3 (255.255.255.0)

  For devices on my network to get an IP address from the device of the ISA, ISA is also the default gateway. I have logged on to the device of Comcast and all firewall rules and blocking are disabled.

  Here's a copy of my current routing table according to the ISA570:

  Destination address	Subnet address	Entry door	Flags *.	Metric	Interface
  192.168.3.0	255.255.255.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	DMZ
  10.1.10.0	255.255.255.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	DEFAULT
  10.1.1.0	255.255.255.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	VOICE
  192.168.25.0	255.255.255.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	COMMENTS
  50.x.x.0	255.255.254.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	WAN1
  127.0.0.0	255.0.0.0	0.0.0.0	U	0	LOOPBACK
  0.0.0.0	0.0.0.0	50.x.x.238	UG	0	WAN1

  My desktop (10.1.10.32), so I'm unable to ping or you connect the unit to comcast to 10.1.10.1.

  So according to me, that missing me something simple here, it is a solution of static route, or I'm looking for policies of NAT?

  Thanks for your help and please let me know if you need more information on my network.

  -Matthew-

  OK, a few possibilities here.

  1. Did you go through this process for the SMC8014 Bridge mode?
     • http://www.handymanhowto.com/2011/08/19/how-to-configure-a-Comcast-business-class-static-IP-address/
  2. I advise to use a different subnet on the LAN of the ISA to the 10.1.10.x interface.  The reason is that when you send a request from a subnet of 10.1.10.x behind the ISA to a subnet of 10.1.10.x, your PC and the ISA assumes that the device is on the same network and will not try to route.  Consider using the subnet of 192.168.75.x by default on ISA LAN interface.

  If you do not step 1 above, then I'm fairly certain that you will not be able to browse the internet at all.  If you can browse the internet, but just can't get the Comcast router 10.1.10.1, then chances are 1 step has already been completed.

  Shawn Eftink
  CCNA/CCDA

  Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

• SG300-52. Prefer to send traffic to the default gateway rather than static route? Network stops if I disable ICMP redirects.

  I have 4 switches, each act as their own with a 26 subnet mask. They have static routes for every other switch. The firewall has a static route to each switch. If I unplug the LAN of the Firewall interface, traffic stops the flow of the switches. If I block the side LAN firewall, ICMP redirects, traffic stalls outside.

  So if you are connected to this switch, say that you pull an ip address of 192.168.122.20. Your front door is the 192.168.122.62 switch. If you try to access a server 192.168.127.142, the SG300 sends your traffic to 192.168.127.254 to get an ICMP redirect, rather than simply to communicate directly with 192.168.127.50.

  My network 'basic' is 192.168.127.0/24 vlan1 and the firewall is 192.168.127.254

  This is the route of one of my switches table (which has 192.168.122.0/26 and ports run on vlan122)

   Maximum Parallel Paths: 1 (1 after reset) IP Forwarding: enabled Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.127.254, 73:48:13, vlan 1 C 192.168.122.0/26 is directly connected, vlan 122 S 192.168.123.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.123, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.124.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.124, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.125.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.125, 73:48:14, vlan 1 C 192.168.127.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1 

  In any case, what gives? Why the switch would first try to send the stream to the firewall?

  EDIT: Here is the server routing table:

   [email protected]/* */:~$ ip route show default via 192.168.127.254 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/26 via 192.168.127.122 dev eth0 192.168.123.0/26 via 192.168.127.123 dev eth0 192.168.124.0/26 via 192.168.127.124 dev eth0 192.168.125.0/26 via 192.168.127.125 dev eth0 192.168.127.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.127.142 

  Hi Jonathan,.

  I'm sorry. I misunderstood the routing table you want to accomplish. Your concern seems relevant given that the matching rule more will be selected instead of one: page 275 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

  ... "When the routing of traffic, the next hop is decided based on the longest match on the prefix (LPM algorithm). A destination IPv4 address might match several routes in the IPv4 static routing Table. The device uses the matching route with the higher, subnet mask that is, the longest match on the prefix. "...

  So go ahead and report it to the support team so the guys can make the laboratory, confirm it and declare additional:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

  Kind regards

  Aleksandra