Static route ISA570W to Comcast gateway/modem

In my view, that it is a question of static route.

I want to be able to connect to the gateway/Modem Comcast (10.1.10.1) using any computer on my network. Currently, I am unable to do this, I am also unable to ping the unit of Comcast. Here's my setup.

Comcast device (SMC8014)

WAN IP: 50.x.x.238

LAN IP: 10.1.10.1 (255.255.255.0)

A single cable CAT5E for:

ISA570W (WAN Port) - (basic out-of-the-box configuration, 1 - WAN, DMZ - 1, 8 - LAN Ports)

WAN STATIC Port info:

IP WAN: 50.x.x.233 bridge (255.255.254.0): 50.x.x.238

LAN IP: 10.1.10.2 (255.255.255.0)

DHCP enabled for bridge VLAN-1 (10.1.10.30 - 99) by default: 10.1.10.2

A single cable CAT5E for:

Cisco SG200 - 50 p (POE switch to serve as a connection for phones and desktop computers)

LAN IP: 10.1.10.3 (255.255.255.0)

For devices on my network to get an IP address from the device of the ISA, ISA is also the default gateway. I have logged on to the device of Comcast and all firewall rules and blocking are disabled.

Here's a copy of my current routing table according to the ISA570:

Destination address

Subnet address Entry door Flags *. Metric Interface

192.168.3.0

255.255.255.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

DMZ

10.1.10.0

255.255.255.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

DEFAULT

10.1.1.0

255.255.255.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

VOICE

192.168.25.0

255.255.255.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

COMMENTS

50.x.x.0

255.255.254.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

WAN1

127.0.0.0

255.0.0.0

0.0.0.0

U

0

LOOPBACK

0.0.0.0

0.0.0.0

50.x.x.238

UG

0

WAN1

My desktop (10.1.10.32), so I'm unable to ping or you connect the unit to comcast to 10.1.10.1.

So according to me, that missing me something simple here, it is a solution of static route, or I'm looking for policies of NAT?

Thanks for your help and please let me know if you need more information on my network.

-Matthew-

OK, a few possibilities here.

  1. Did you go through this process for the SMC8014 Bridge mode?

  2. I advise to use a different subnet on the LAN of the ISA to the 10.1.10.x interface.  The reason is that when you send a request from a subnet of 10.1.10.x behind the ISA to a subnet of 10.1.10.x, your PC and the ISA assumes that the device is on the same network and will not try to route.  Consider using the subnet of 192.168.75.x by default on ISA LAN interface.

If you do not step 1 above, then I'm fairly certain that you will not be able to browse the internet at all.  If you can browse the internet, but just can't get the Comcast router 10.1.10.1, then chances are 1 step has already been completed.

Shawn Eftink
CCNA/CCDA

Please note all useful messages and mark the correct answers to help others looking for solutions in the community.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

  • Encryption advice please WRT160N router/gateway/modem wireless

    I would like clarification on security and encryption please.

    I have a WRT160N router/gateway/modem wireless with WPA security is enabled.  I have a wired office with LELA installed and a wireless laptop.  A key is required when connecting the laptop but on page properties in LELA, it says "wireless encryption - no ' is this extra encryption in addition to the security theWPA. WH n I try to enable it, LELA asks the password admin but after entering that does nothing (except once again ask!)  What I am doing wrong?

    Thank you

    That your network is already reached, but him dosent software LELA display you something on your safety. This means that the LELA was not able to properly synchronize with the router and its wireless settings. So in this case, you do not have to worry about this, if you want you can uninstall and reinstall the LELA software on your computer, that might solve the problem. Or of another Complitely uninstall LELA software from your computer.

  • SG300-52. Prefer to send traffic to the default gateway rather than static route? Network stops if I disable ICMP redirects.

    I have 4 switches, each act as their own with a 26 subnet mask. They have static routes for every other switch. The firewall has a static route to each switch. If I unplug the LAN of the Firewall interface, traffic stops the flow of the switches. If I block the side LAN firewall, ICMP redirects, traffic stalls outside.

    So if you are connected to this switch, say that you pull an ip address of 192.168.122.20. Your front door is the 192.168.122.62 switch. If you try to access a server 192.168.127.142, the SG300 sends your traffic to 192.168.127.254 to get an ICMP redirect, rather than simply to communicate directly with 192.168.127.50.

    My network 'basic' is 192.168.127.0/24 vlan1 and the firewall is 192.168.127.254

    This is the route of one of my switches table (which has 192.168.122.0/26 and ports run on vlan122)

     Maximum Parallel Paths: 1 (1 after reset) IP Forwarding: enabled Codes: > - best, C - connected, S - static S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/1] via 192.168.127.254, 73:48:13, vlan 1 C 192.168.122.0/26 is directly connected, vlan 122 S 192.168.123.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.123, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.124.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.124, 73:48:13, vlan 1 S 192.168.125.0/26 [1/1] via 192.168.127.125, 73:48:14, vlan 1 C 192.168.127.0/24 is directly connected, vlan 1 

    In any case, what gives? Why the switch would first try to send the stream to the firewall?

    EDIT: Here is the server routing table:

     [email protected]/* */:~$ ip route show default via 192.168.127.254 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/26 via 192.168.127.122 dev eth0 192.168.123.0/26 via 192.168.127.123 dev eth0 192.168.124.0/26 via 192.168.127.124 dev eth0 192.168.125.0/26 via 192.168.127.125 dev eth0 192.168.127.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.127.142 

    Hi Jonathan,.

    I'm sorry. I misunderstood the routing table you want to accomplish. Your concern seems relevant given that the matching rule more will be selected instead of one: page 275 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/csbms/sf30x_sg30x/...

    ... "When the routing of traffic, the next hop is decided based on the longest match on the prefix (LPM algorithm). A destination IPv4 address might match several routes in the IPv4 static routing Table. The device uses the matching route with the higher, subnet mask that is, the longest match on the prefix. "...

    So go ahead and report it to the support team so the guys can make the laboratory, confirm it and declare additional:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/Web/TSD-Cisco-small-business-suppor...

    Kind regards

    Aleksandra

  • Connecting two routers via a static route

    I have a relatively simple configuration involving a Wireless-N Router and a wireless-B router (several years).  The N wireless router is connected to the internet (via DSL modem) and accepts several DHCP clients without problem.  Wireless - b router is connected to the Wireless-N router.  To do this, I connected the WAN port on the router wireless - b to a port on the router Wireless N ethernet (did not use the uplink). I have a PC connected to the router wireless - b, so I want him to be able to hit the internet, but also be accessible to DHCP clients on the Wireless N router.  The PC connects to the internet successfully, but it does not find clients on the network supported by the Wireless-N router.  It's about my setup:

    B 192.168.55.1 wireless router (LAN) 192.168.56.102 (WAN)

    PC 192.168.55.10 (active dhcp)

    Wireless N 192.168.56.1 (LAN) x.x.x.x (internet)

    (several clients dhcp... 192.168.56.100...)

    I've added a static route in the hope that a computer on the network of the Wireless N router would be able to hit the PC, but nothing helped. I've added a static route as such, on the Wireless-N router, which was the only way that that would enable the web interface:

    Destination LAN 192.168.55.0

    Subnet mask 255.255.255.0

    Gateway 192.168.56.102

    I tried to place the router without wireless - B gateway mode, then router and changed mode, then return.  I can connect to the web interface of the router wireless - b from the PC, and I can connect to the internet from the PC.  Also, the PC is able to reach customers on Wireless N, but the reverse is not true, i.e. clients on Wireless N can't find clients on the wireless - B network. Also, I turned on the port forwarding on the router wireless - B so that it points to the PC, in the hope he would lead all traffic to the PC, but still cannot access PC.  How to configure both routers (or both set up as access point?) so that clients on the Wireless N Router can talk to customers on the wireless router - B?  For now, all customers are on DHCP, but finally, I would like to create static entries for at least two or three of them.

    Thanks in advance

    Are Linksys routers teas? If so what model is router B? It may not supported for a DHCP client port forwarding. Even if you can get the port forwarding to work for a client on router B, it will not work for several clients.

    In addition, if you have the option in router B, disable the SPI Firewall. It is the cause of the problem, in my opinion. If you do this, you should port forward.

    Is there a reason that you connect the routers via the WAN port on the router B? You could uplink using an ethernet port on the B to an ethernet port on the N and avoid all this... You can always configure router B as a point of wireless access for specific customers.

  • Static routing question

    I just took a WRT610N and configure a few static routes for my network.

    I have the router connected to a cable modem WAN and the interface of local network connected to my LAN via 192.168.0.1.

    I have three other LAN subnets in a test environment, they are:-

    172.16.0.0/24

    172.16.100.0/24

    172.16.200.0/24

    I tried to add the following to the first subnet:

    Destination = 172.16.0.0 LAN IP address

    Subnet mask = 255.255.255.0

    Gateway = 172.16.0.1

    Interface = LAN

    No matter what I try, I get a message saying route static invalid, and I can't get anything to stick.  Everyone can't see what I'm doing wrong?

    Thank you guys!

    Gary

    The IP address of the gateway in a static route is the IP address of the connected device directly on each side of the router, either on the ethernet LAN or WAN side.

    In particular you cannot route a subnet of an IP address of the gateway inside the target IP subnet. The static route example you deposited directions where to send traffic destined to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0. It is impossible to set the address of the gateway as 172.16.0.1 because the router doesn't know where to send the traffic to 172.16.0.1.

    In other words, the IP address of the gateway must in most cases be a 192.168.0. * IP address that you use these IP addresses in the local network of the WRT. The IP address of the gateway should be the IP address of the router on the subnet specific target within your local network.

    For example, if your second router with address 172.16.0.1/255.255.255.0 IP LAN has an IP 192.168.0.2, then the 192.168.0.2 is the IP address of the gateway for the static route to 172.16.0.0/255.255.255.0.

  • Static route / network Configuration?

    I have a cable modem that connects via Ethernet (eth0) of a configuration for NAT and Firewall Linux box.  Another card (eth1) connects to a switch for my cable network (192.168.1.1/24).  I added a third adapter (eth2 - 192.168.2.1/24) which is connected to a M20 (192.168.2.2).  The server DHCP M20 has been implemented to serve the 192.168.3.1/24 network.

    Is there a configuration more simple than that?

    Problems reported with the current configuration:

    (1) I think the M20 NAT function must be disabled because the Linux machine is.  However, disable NAT causes machines on 192.168.3 bad connection to the internet.

    (2) I want the machines wirelessly on 192.168.3 to see shared windows on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  Currently they do not see each other.  If I remove M20 and plug a PC eth2 and set as 192.168.2.2, this machine can see actions on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  I think a static route must be set on the M20 so that he knows what to do with traffic to 192.168.1.  However, I don't properly because he always tells me I have an invalid route when I try to enter.

    (3) is there one another device other than on the M20 motorway which would better suit my needs (adding a wireless to my private/internal network segment)?

    Kind regards

    Case No.

    OK, I just saw the previous thread on this question pop up on the first page,

    Valet parking can be defined as an access point only?

    I'll try the posted instructions here.

  • Static routing LRT214 does not

    Hello

    I have a hard time with a static routing on LRT214.

    My configuration:

    * LRT214 (recently purchased), acting as a gateway to the internet, local subnet is 192.168.28.0/24

    * There is a local VPN (192.168.28.98) server on the local network, serving a LAN tunnel with subnet 192.168.29.0/24. on LRT214 port forwarding is configured

    I can connect to my VPN server on the internet, and I can access the machine running on the VPN server (for example via ssh).

    However, I can not connect to any other computer on my LAN, although I tried

    adding another subnet under Configuration > network > LAN settings

    * setting up a static route under Setup > Advanced Routing (kind of route add - net 192.168.29.0/24 gw 192.168.28.98)

    of course, when I add the itinerary of statitc over any computer on the local network, I can connect via VPN tunnel to the machine, so its clearly a problem of LRT214.

    Please help, how can I configure a static route for this scenario in the user Web interface?

    The SPI Firewall, intercept traffic.

    As far as I understand, it could be that when the VPN server sends data to another machine on the local network, this happens on layer 2 (where the SPI Firewall not listening), while the return on the VPN server traffic is routed higher up in the stack, where the SPI listening and intercept.

    So, I will use the above workarounds, or put the OpenVPN server on a different subnet or VLAN, which I do anyway. I tried a basic configuration of VLAN yesterday (just put the Server full VPN with all interfaces in one VLAN separated), with InterVLAN routing enabled, but there seems to be some particularities with it (like the ping works, but not ssh). In any case, it's another story. Thanks for you support.

  • Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

    Hi all

    I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

    My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
    The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

    My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

    However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

    I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

    However, the road does not work yet.

    in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

    Thanks for your help!

    Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

    You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

    If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

  • Add a static route to a RV042

    I have configured the RV042 dual WAN port for backup smart link connected to two different ISPS.  The subnet behind this is 192.168.2.xxx.  I have a second router linksys Garland with the 192.168.2.250 WAN port and subnet behind it is 192.168.20.xxx.  My problem is that I have a not able to route traffic fron 192.168.2.xxx to 192.168.20.xxx.  How can I add a static route so that clients on 192.168.2.xxx can access resources on 192.168.20.xxx?

    1. the second Linksys router must be changed of gateway (active NAT) in router mode (NAT disabled) mode. With NAT the LAN behind the second Linksys will be not accessible from the outside unless you configure port forwarding.

    2. on the RV042 set up a static route for the subnet 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 to the gateway IP address 1921.68.2.250 on the LAN interface.

    3. Ideally, you must configure the same static route on all clients connected to the RV042. If you don't want to do this, you must configure the firewall on all clients on the RV042 accept ICMP redirect messages. This is important because otherwise all traffic from 192.168.2. * to * 192.168.20 would be sent to the RV042 and from there to the second Linksys that is unnecessary and could create a bottleneck.

  • Remove the static route by default

    Hello

    I have a switch L3 which has a static default route pointing to a FW that is connected to a circuit of the Internet. The same L3 switch made EIGRP routers on our MPLS network. If this default static route disappears EIGRP will inject a default route, and users will receive their Internet traffic through the MPLS cloud as a backup.

    My question is how to remove this static road by default with a mechanism that is unique on the Internet circuit. I can't count on line protocol because it almost never goes down. I can't rely on Internet ping IP SLA addresses because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop of the SLA of intellectual property.

    I wish I could do BGP with the Internet provider but this circuit is in a country where it would be difficult.

    Any ideas on how to remove this default static route based on something that is unique to this tour of the Internet.

    Thank you

    P.

    "I can't rely on Internet addresses ping IP SLA because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop IP SLA."

    To remedy this situation, you must add a route with the 'permanent' switch at the end of any IP you track on your IPSLA... In this way, if this interface is down, your ping IPSLA would stop and IPSLA would be the move and change your default route.

    Example:

    Route IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 Permanent

    where 1.1.1.1 is the IP address, you are followed and 2.2.2.2 is your 'usual' default gateway

  • Removing static route get % corresponding to any error no route to remove

    I'm trying to remove a static route, I added:

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    R2 #show ip route
    Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
    D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
    N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
    i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
    -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
    o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

    Gateway of last resort is not set

    172.168.0.0/29 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
    S 172.168.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.2
    C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
    192.168.2.0/30 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
    C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
    R2 #conf t
    Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
    R2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
    % Corresponding to any no route to remove
    R2 (config) #r2 #show ip route

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I was training establishment of a static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1 (2600xm) via maps module T1 on the serial ports. connected to r1 is a router 2500 old called PC.

    I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 I connect to 2500 another console cable that I use to access a server I get the above error.  all IP addresses are just generic subnets that I created to play with static routing.   I can't remove someone has any ideas?

    you use the subnet mask different than the one you used. According to the route table entry mask is 29

    Try this,

    1] r2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.248 192.168.2.2

    or 2] another easy method would be to check the working config and copy stick with 'no' at the beginning.

    See the race | include the ip route

    Copy the static route statement and paste this what with 'no' in the global configuration and check the routing table.

  • Adding static route to the ACS

    How can I add a static route to my device SE ACS?

    I try to get AAA works on a Cisco 871 is an end of distance of a vpn s2s ASA to 871. On the router, I use as the source for Ganymede interface vlan1.

    My ACS server is on the subnet for my ASA management, but the GBA to the Remote LAN road is via its default gateway and interface from the INSIDE of the SAA. I need to get the traffic of Ganymede ACS to return through the management interface of ASA.

    Thanks in advance.

    John

    John,

    There is no way to set a static route in the GBA unit. The only network settings, you can set are the ip address/subnet, default gateway and dns servers.

    Kind regards

    ~ JG

    Please mark it is resolved so other can benefit from

  • Explain SGE2000/P static routing (equal to L2 +)?

    L2 + mean?  I know these aren't L3 switches with IVR capabilities, then what is the purpose to configure static routes, if there is no functionality InterVLAN routing?

    T.I.A.,

    Chris

    Welcome to Cisco Community!

    With get them into a huge discussion, I will try to respond as quickly and directly as possible.

    Our EMS and EMS in the series switches are layer 3 switches (can also be configured as L2) so that they are able to operate as a (inter VLAN) router or gateway for all the VLANS. Once you have created the VLANS and assign an IP address, that IP address will become the GW for this VLAN. Under routing, you will not see any scholarly networks until what you assign the VLAN to a port and the port is enabled. You will then need to configure a default route to send traffic to the cloud. The router must belong to the same VLAN on the switch. So if the switch has an IP address of 172.16.30.1/24, the router will have an IP address of 172.16.30.254/24 for example. The road reads: next hop metric 172.16.30.254 0.0.0.0/0 2 (or higher).

    With respect to the static routes as a switch L2 or L3, that they would be useful when you have a device connected to another switch that is disjoint from your typical network of the local switch. In other words, let's say you have 3 (except default native VLAN 1) VLAN V10 - 30. Everything you devices belong to these VLANs, but you have a server on 30 VLAN that is not connected to this switch. You will then create a static route for the IP address of this server to the remote switch.

    VLAN30: 172.16.30.1 (local EMS)

    Server: 172.16.30.200 (on the remote switch)

    Remote switch: 192.168.20.1 (distance EMS)

    VLAN30: 172.16.30.2 (on the EMS distance)

    Static route:

    hop metric 172.16.30.2 next destination 172.16.30.200 2

    I hope that answers your question. These are really my favorite switches, because I find them very reliable and highly configurable. I love these things.

  • RV042 Question of static routing

    I am currently using RV042 in the two-WAN backup mode. However, I tried the redundant option and think it's to give me more bandwidth and better performance than only the WAN.

    My problem is that in redundant mode, I am unable to use a few sites that I use on a regular basis. One of the sites is our Web Timesheet hosted service and their website will just crazy when I try to access the router set up in redundant mode. I am still not able to connect to their site, and it is important for my daily work.

    My question is - can I configure static for some sites routes so that the router knows he must access them through my WAN alone? For example, if my site of timesheet software is 123.123.123.123, and my favorite WAN gateway is 68.68.68.68, I can the router only to access this site through the specific gateway, even if the router is configured to use either WAN?

    I tried static routes and it doesn't seem to work at all.

    For example:

    Site: 123.123.123.123

    SM: 255.255.255.0

    Gateway 68.68.68.68

    When I save it and run the tracert to 123.123.123.123, it passes through the other door, and not that I mentioned here.

    Any tips are appreciated.

    Thank you
    Alex P.

    If your help it balance mode, go to system management support and scroll down to protocol binding.  Chances are you're going to a site secured with the two beginning of work and the site sees a connection with two upcoming ip home addresses and interrupts the connection.  You can perform a binding protocol for all your https traffic out a wan for all your network ip addresses and this should solve the problem.  You can do it for mail and other protocols that would be stripped by the dual wan.  I hope this helps.

  • What is checked first, GLBP or static route?

    I have 2 routers doing GLBP. The virtual IP address is given to jobs as a default gateway.

    When a packet hits the default gateway, it will go to RTR - A. Then the second package request will go to RTR - B. It's all good via GLBP.

    The question is, if RTR - A is a static route to 66.66.66.66 and the next hop for this destination is via RTR - B, how will RTR - A treat this package when RTR - is the router that needs to deliver the package to the internet? I mean, how is this Treaty?

    GLBP will review the package and then determine what it is RTR - A tour to take it, then it give RTR - A, and then this router will focus on its local routing table and then it give RTR - B because the destination is 66.66.66.66?

    Or the static route will take precedence GLBP? but again, only RTR - A will have this static route entry as the network admin pushes everyting for 66.66.66.66 out of the RTR - B. Confusion is the GLBP thing.

    Thank you for the help

    Hello

    GLBP works on a per-host basis and not per package. I mean, when the host is the gateway for the first time, this is the moment where we decide which router is actually going to be pass packets to the host.

    Consider this example

    Three host X, Y, Z

    Two routers with GLBP RTR A and B RTR operating in the Round Robin database

    1. Boots X host receives the IP via DHCP or configured statically, it will send the ARP request to the gateway. ARP request is served by RTR and he sends MAC address. Host X now use RTR A gateway
    2. Boots of host obtains the IP via DHCP or configured statically, it will send the ARP request to the gateway. ARP request this time is served by RTR B because GLBP is set to be in round robin mode. RTR B sends address MAC to host b. host Y will now use RTR B gateway
    3. Boots of the host Z Gets the IP via DHCP or configured statically, it will send the ARP request to the gateway. ARP request is served by RTR has time and he sends MAC address. Host X now use RTR A gateway

    RTR has accessibility to 66.66.66.66 network RTR B also accessibility features. This package can be transferred.

    X(a) RTR as gateway host sends the packet to 66.66.66.66 going A RTR, which will send to RTR B because of the static route.

    Host Y (RTR B as gateway) sends out packets to 66.66.66.66 going to RTR B, which it will process in accordance with its routing table

    I hope this helps.

    See you soon

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reading of fluctuation thermocouple k type

    I'm new to Labview please anyone can help would be appreciated. I'm trying to read the temperature using thermocouple type K with a NI 9213 module in Labview. I used two individual channels.  One is the ambient air temperature. The second is one is i

  • How can I disable keys

    How can I disable keys such as CTRL + ALT + down arrow?  I use this combination quite often in another program and whenever I do, it flips my screen upside: (.)  I tried to open gpedit.msc and go to user administration models, components Configuratio

  • Mirco SD blackBerry Smartphone problem

    I'm trying to get us a 4 GB micro sd hc card in my Curve 8310.  I've updated the software on my curve to v4.5.  I don't have another computer to format the card.  My curve recognizes the card, but will not format the card.  I have a mac with pocketma

  • Serialization, running after Photoshop Cloud install but license says still 7 days remaining

    I just do a test for the installation of an application Adobe Creative Cloud (Photoshop), and then apply the process of AdobeSerialzation. I managed to install successfully, then in the window of creative cloud it displays like Photoshop with 7 days

  • How to install Adobe Creative Suite Master Collection with a serial number?

    I am a student at the University of full veil from 2012. Full Sail University has sent me the Adobe Creative Master Suite Collection for my school and I just downloaded on my MacBook Pro when I got the Adobe Creative Suite Master Collection. My MacBo