RX 100 Macro

Similar Questions

• Delete all SNAPSHOTS with script

  I'm trying to set up a workflow for my colleagues to easily adjust color, brightness and so on by simply clicking on a SNAPSHOT that easily shows them the result. The snapshot is generated by a macro master calling alarge number of macros. But my clever :-) solution fails because I want to give them the opportunity to run the macro master twice (for example the brightness) and they are then asked with a dialog box that asks them if they would like to replace the snapshot that already exist wit the same name. Simply, I don't know an easy way to delete snapshots. Historic range is easy to remove. If it was just a bunch of macros I could find a way to fix it manually, but I have like 80-100 macros in different groups.

  I thought of this solution:

  MASTER MACRO 1

  -SELECT ALL. COPY.

  -DELETE ALL THE SNAPSHOTS (with the script)

  -PASTE THE IMAGE

  -MACRO RUNS APPLE (Apple instant recording)

  -MACRO RUNS TOMATO (tomato instant recording)

  -CONTINUES DURING SEVERAL OTHER...

  The user chooses instant TOMATO , also wants to run snapshot APPLE. Click again on the MACRO 1.

  Someone out there who can think of a solution or another idea?

  (Photoshop CS6 on a Mac)

  Here is the solution:

  var doc = app.activeDocument;

  HS var = doc.historyStates;

  for (var a = hs.length - 1; a > = 0;--a) {})

  {if(HS[a].) Snapshot)}

  doc.activeHistoryState = [a] hs;

  delHist();

  }

  }

  function delHist() {}

  var desc20 = new ActionDescriptor();

  var ref23 = new ActionReference();

  ref23.putProperty (charIDToTypeID ('HstS'), charIDToTypeID ('Indonésia'));

  desc20.putReference (charIDToTypeID ('null'), ref23);

  executeAction (charIDToTypeID ('Dlt'), desc20, DialogModes.NO);

  };

• Canon EF 100 mm F2.8 Macro L, parts

  Hi, as you can clearly see that my canon 100mm f2.8l macro lens before mounting the filter thread is little damaged, as was the piece of plastic, the filter always live and unscrews easily, but I need to spare for this goal, if anyone can help me is it be one, and estimated price. ?

  Thank you.

  

  If you call Canon Service Dept., they sell and ship you the part.

  However, it might not be very easy to install and may require special tools. I don't really know, without seeing a mounting manual and diagrams for the particular lens. You better send the lens for repairs. I've seen several lenses removed for repair by inexperienced people end up as Clipboard.

  Coordinated for the Canon Service Center nearest lie on the Canon USA site (I'm assuming your in the U.S... If not, check your local website of Canon).

  ***********

  Alan Myers
  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & EXPOSUREMANAGER

• Macro + telephoto?

  Questions first then bottom.

  Sigma f/2.8 150 mm macro with a 1.4 teleconverter OS x will provide me with close IQ than a nice 2.8 70-200 mm telephoto? (so I can buy a gem, but which is easier to sell to my wife) or I really have to choose between telephoto OR macro?

  If I get a 1.4 x teleconverter, I should get the Sigma one or I could get equivalent QI pro300 kenko (which would then allow to be used with a future purchase as a Canon 100-400mm).

  Background:

  I'm looking to make my first expensive lens to buy.  I am relatively new to photography (10 months) but took many photos and maybe even climb.

  I love and tend to take snaps for most wildlife and macro.  I bought a doublet close-up filter which is great for static elements (spiders in webs, etc.) but would like a true macro lens that can always capture capricious insects such as dragonflies.  I would say that 90% of all of my photos are taken at 250mm on my goal of 55-259.  I'd love to take sharper photos than my current goal is possible.

  I was leaning towards the macro Sigma 150 mm OS for its image stabilization and long lens for bugs and hoping that it could double for a telephoto lens in particular, if I add a 1.4 x teleconverter.  (which, at 210mm would make me close my current 250 mm)

  I rented this lens Sigma and sigma 1.4 TC to go with her for a weekend and was happy with my mothering of results.

  I probably eventually get a long telephoto lens (I think probably the Canon 100-400mm), and my other dear goal will probably be 15-85 or 17-55 2.8 canons.

  Thanks for any adivce or thoughts!

  Click here to see the images next to the Sigma 150 vs almost no matter what other purpose under the Sun. It is the site of digital photography, which I really love.

  http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/ISO-12233-sample-crops.aspx?lens=807&camera=453&sample=0&...

  If the link doesn't work, or if you want to play with the different lenses, remember this: to see a lens WITH a TELECONVERTER simply select a focal length longer than the max for the lens, and if they have it, it will automatically show you the image with the mounted TC.

  Acceptable image quality is in the eye of the beholder. Judge for yourself.

  Good luck!

• Buy a lens that is suitable for portraits and photography macro?

  I have a canon 600 d.

  I want to buy a lens that can work as well for portraits and also for the macro. Is this possible?

  Budget is about $400. Stretch Max $ 600

  I was recommended 50 mm f1.8 for portraits.

  It will also work as a macro lens?

  Thanks you.what you hear by 100 mm too long for the portrait? a long time in the size of the lens? What's really important.
  I'm sorry if you find my questions too basic pls.

• Question macro lenses

  I'm looking to take my macro photography to the next level.  As far as body go, I have a 6 d and a 70 d.  For the 6 d, I have an EF 100 mm f/2.8 L macro lens, and for the 70 D, I have an EF-S 60 mm f/2.8 lens.  I'm looking to the MP-E 65mm f/2.8, and here my question: this lens is compatible with the full-frame and APS - C sensor bodies?

  It's a regular EF mount so it adapts to any EOS body.

• Canon EF 70-210mm F/4.0 Macro Zoom Lens

  A Canon EF 70-210mm lens Zoom Macro F/4.0 is already used on a Canon EOS 630 is usable on modern SLRS like the Canon 6 d?

  should work the same, BUT it is perhaps not as optically perfect like new lenses. With film, you were not able to expand your negatives in the same way you can with a digital file using your monitor to display 100%. Some like to do that but in the real world, when you print that big with excellent results.

• Possibilities of macro?

  Thanks for reading this.
  I like to take pictures of things like insects and small lizards. I found a really cool Mantis yesterday in the garden and took some pictures of it. I used my 70-200 with the 1.4 tc which was pretty good, but I could of course not very close because the limits of depth of focus. I am considering getting the barrel extension tubes: EF 12 II and EF 25 II. What is a good way to go? Here's something that you would use as well as a tc on a 70-200? Or is the wrong type of lens for this kind of work? I also had an initial investigation of the flash macro circular rings. But I am assuming that they would work with my 70-200 cause of large diameter of the front element. He seems to have a lot of options for macro set ups. What kind if the installer should be to make the pretty decent macro shots? I was a big fan of Igor Siwanowicz' work for a very long time.

  See you soon,.
  CG.

  Hello

  As ebiggs says, there are several ways to make macro shots.

  Personally, I use a number of extension tubes (a set of Kenko of 3-36, 20 & 12 mm - more a 25mm cannon and two Canon 12 mm). These are always useful to have, and I wouldn't be without a few in my camera bag, all the time. They are inexpensive and can allow you to get this macro or close-up when you do not have a lens macro with you, or can be used to increase the capabilities of a true macro lens beyond magnification is 1:1 (general) potential, or simply used to get the nearest minimum focus distance with a telephoto lens.

  For example, this was shot with EF 70-200/2.8 IS, Canon 25 mm extension tube and 550EX flash (filling)...

  

  I have been hunting of birds and did not have a macro with my lens.

  For sub image to frame the small Bush * i * (replace the astericks with "t"... the cyber censorship allow me to use the actual name of this bird) as tight as I wanted, I needed to add a 36mm extension tube to an EF 500/4 IS lens, so that the lens to focus more closely...

  

  While they are not necessarily designed for the macro or almost macro work teleconverters (Canon calls Extenders) change the effective focal length of a lens, but leave its closest distance focal length quantity... so will increase the potential of magnification. In order to get the slot kick a little fence lizard, I have had to use time - Canon EF 1. 4 X II and an extension of 25 mm - 300/2.8 IS lens...

  

  More the focal length of your lens, the effect less any given amount of expansion will give. An extension of 25mm changes slightly the magnification and the closest focusing distance of a 300mm lens... But the same amount of extension on a 50mm lens would have dramatic effect.  Next image was shot with 12mm on the EF 50/1.4 lens extension...

  

  Even more extreme, the following was shot with 12mm on an EF 20/2.8 lens extension (I wanted an extra depth of field to keep more detailed background)...

  

  During the filming of the foregoing, the petals of flowers were actually touch the front element of the lens! Can't get much closer than that!

  The macro above or near macro shots were made using lenses "non-macro" that have been made to concentrate more than normally possible, using extension tubes. Those who can work, but there are some advantages to true macro lenses, too. I personally use four in my Canon Kit: Tamron SP AF 60mm f2.0, Canon MP-E 65mm f2.8, Canon 100/2.8 USM (not the L / IS) and Canon 180 / 3.5 L. I also use a Canon TS - E 45/2.8 for big jobs and occasionally a target macro Tamron SP 90/2.5 1:2 vintage, adapted.

  When you force non-macro lens to focus closer than expected, there may be side effects. For example, the shot of the rose bud above has a pretty strong vignetting and softer edges. It's characterisic of the EF 50/1.4 lens when it is done to focus very narrow and more openness is used... It is not necessarily a bad thing. I used the lens with extension deliberately for this one, because I wanted so much vignetting and soften the effects.

  One thing, you don't need to worry with 'real' macro lenses is image quality. In general, they are all very able to make beautiful pictures. It is lower for other features of macro lenses that set apart them from each other.

  Focal length is probably the main consideration. Too short a macro lens can get awfully close to your subjects, which could scare the living creatures, or do you throw an unwanted shadow on the subject or not even you bit or stung! A longer lens gives you more space to work, but a long lens is hard to get a stable shot and makes very very shallow depth of field.

  If I could have only one, I would choose my USM Canon EF 100/2.8 macro lens. It's the best all around for my purposes, on both devices of cultures (like yours, although I use 7Ds) and full frame (5 d MkII). 90 to 105mm gives the reasonable working distance, but it is quite easily portable for quick shots. DOF is still shallow, but manageable enough without resorting to ridiculously small openings where lighting is a problem and optical diffraction robs fine detal of images.

  Here's an example shot with my 180 / 3.5 L, which demonstrates how depth of field thin razor can get with such a long focal length...

  

  Even if it's a fairly large bee, the plan of sharpness is only of a few mm of depth. This was shot near 1:1 on full frame (with a film camera, actually). The lens and the camera are resting on the ground to help keep their constant. Something close to 100mm is much more easily portable, not too big and makes a bit more depth of field.

  There are other features of the Canon EF 100/2.8 USM which make a great macro lens, IMO.

  It's 'internal focus' (IF), which means that it does not grow in length when you focus it close, so don't cut your work remotely (note: 100L, Tamron 60/2 and 180 / 3.5 L are also IF lenses). However, there is no such thing as a free lunch, with optics. In order for the 100/2.8 if it starts raining that some other lenses of similar focal length. And the focus distance actually changes somewhat because it brought closer. I heard max with 1:1 magnification, it is closer to the 70mm lens... but it is not particularly notable in the field of work with the goal.

  100/2.8 USM macro lens on a crop sensor camera, with 550EX flash, pocket...

  

  Version 100/2.8 that I use has player development USM, which gives it an autofocus fast enough for a macro lens. Macro lenses tend to be slower to focus for a few reasons. One is that they must move their items focusing a long, long way to go all the way from infinity to 1:1 magnification. Another is that most precision signals more speed, so use what is called a mechanism of the development of "throw long". In the old days of manual focus, you have to turn the focus ring a lot more away with a target at long range. Short-range lenses were built for speed and could be used for sports photography. By car from the 100mm USM (who are also the EF - S 60 / 2.8, 100 and 180 / 3.5 L) makes more than one lens dual use, more usable for purposes of non-macro. Despite USM, the 180/3.5 L is significantly more slow development and not as useful for the non-macro works.

  I make the distinction between macro and non-macro focus because often the macro shooting focuses more easily manually. I use AF sometimes, but just as often or more often use the development manual method or the other.  But if you want to use as a non-macro, also, moderate telephoto lens it can be enjoyable if it is reasonably fast to the point. Another advantage of USM, it's that you haven't disable AF before substitution manually. (Note: there was a version prior to EF 100/2.8, abandoned years ago, that has no USM).

  For me, one of the most important features of the Canon 100 mm macro lenses is that they may fit with a Ruff of the tripod mounting. The 100/2.8 USM uses tripod ring B (b) and 100L tripod D ring. I'm not aware of any other macro lenses less than 150mm than a being mounted with a ring of tripod and for me, this is a very important feature. A lot of macro photography is made of a tripod or monopod. That is one of the reasons I really don't think that he had to upgrade to the new version IS..., the more it costs much more. In addition, the stabilization is of limited effectiveness when shooting macro... If this can be nice when you use the goal for non-macro purposes (except that I have several other lenses, so do not rely on the macro for dual use that much). The 180 / 3.5 L and most other 150 mm and more macro lenses equipped with a tripod ring.

  Speaking of stabilization, the Canon 100 L uses a hybrid form developed especially for macro, which obviously is one of the most effective. However, the 1:1 mag, it could only be good for one or two stops of assistance. For non-macro photos, the IS could give three or four stops assistance.

  I had the Tamron SP 60/2.0 recently because it is quite small and light, easy to store in my camera bag, when I don't know if I'll take any macro shots or not, have other gear to carry around. The same is true for the Canon EF - S 60/2.8 USM, it is just as compact. I opted for the Tamron for its opening of f2, mainly in order to use the lens for portraits, as well. Both the Canon and the Tamron 60 mm lenses are "cultures only" (all other macros mentioned are capable of FF).  I don't have the images uploaded of him online yet, but have found the quality to be good enough. It is a bit slow focusing... no problem for the macro or portraits, but not a goal I would use for sport and shooting action. I imagine that the Canon with its USM is developed faster.

  

  I used to use the vintage (25-30 years) Tamron 90 mm as my macro "compact" (shown on one of my 7Ds, above)... and he is used to this end but was less useful for portraits. Yet, for a goal which cost me about 60 US $. It's $20 for the lens - like new with hood, 1:1 adapter, caps and a Nikon Adaptall mount - plus $40 for a China Adaptall-EOS mount.  It is slower to work with. Set to manual focus, as well as manual control of the opening, but did a good job (here with the extension tube of 36mm to increase the magnification).

  

  The other lenses I mentioned use are more specialized. The Canon MP-E 65mm macro is a very high magnification, the manual focus lens. The magnification less he can give is 1:1, where most other macro lenses are at their maximum (unless you add extension for them tubes). It goes back to 5 / 1 or 5 X life size, so, essentially, can fill the frame on one of my 7Ds with a grain of rice.  Image made with the MP - E 65mm here is a tiny snail, newly hatched which was smaller than the nail on my pinky, at 2 X magnification...

  

  I must say, I would not recommend the MP-E 65mm as a first macro lens. It will especially be a lens only tripod. Depth of field is incredibly deep. Due to the extension of the objective, it's more small aperture of f16 becomes something like an effective f96 at higher magnification. I'll have to work on the development of techniques of stacking with this lens (and will need something much slower moving than a snail, shoot those!).

  I use the lens 'Tilt Shift' TS - E 45mm especially for close-ups of small product... Shoots of studio on table, like this that was one of hundreds of fact for the customer's Web site...

  

  Magnification with the 45mm alone isn't really the territory of the macro, but it allows a single control in terms of development with the tilt movements, as well as ways to dodge the reflections with the movements of travel. It is the manual focus lens, too. For higher magnfication work, the TS-E 90mm might be a better choice and magnification of two lenses can be increased by using extension tubes.

  As for flash, there are choices with those, too. There are specialized macro flashes or ways to use standard flashes for macro photos.

  I used a Canon MR - 14EX Ringlite for turned snail, above. I mainly only use a ring light with very high magnificatioin shots... to the low mags just light seems flat and 'clinical' for me. As far as I know, the MR-14EX is pretty much dedicated to Canon lenses, since it clips directly on the lens, locking silver that is on the Canon lenses.

  MR-14EX on MP-E 65mm, on 7 d...

  

  More often, especially for 1:1 magnification and more low blows, I use Canon MT - 24EX Twin Lite or a unique and standard flash with some minor changes. The Twin Lite is great, but a package large enough and not very useful for non macro. Also, it is designed to attach on the front of the Canon lenses, but is more flexible because it can be used with a more generic double flash support, too.

  Image of LH: MT-24EX normally mounted. Center: Double Lepp/Stroboframe flash support. Image of HR: MT-24EX on support Lepp.

     

  But do not use a dedicated, macro flash either. Often I will just use a flash unique and standard cord shoes off camera so that I can stand to the side of or above the object...

  

  Note that I put two coats of white qauze bandage on the flash head, maintained by a rubber band. This reduces and diffuse the power of the flash so that it can be used near a small subject. A single flash works surprisingly well, because compared to a small topic, it's like a giant light box in the sky. This Mantis was shot using something similar to the above setup (and EF 100/2.8 USM macro lens)...

  

  Enjoy you shopping!

  Macro is lots of fun... and a lot easier today than it was back in the good/bad old days of film! One of my old rigging...

  

  ***********
  Alan Myers

  San Jose, California, USA.
  «Market softly and carry a great lens.»
  MATERIAL: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
  FLICKR & REPROGRAPHY

• is 100mm f 2.8 L usm macro/mr14 ex

  Can someone Advisor on the number of part of the mounting plate for the lens macro flash above combination

  Thank you

  It mounts directly.   You don't need something more?  But the EF 100 mm is a 67mm.

• Range Focus limiter on the 100mm Macro F2.8

  On an ILCA - 77M 2, just how to deal with this switch

  Of the operating instructions of the Macro Sony SAL100M28 100 mm f/2.8 lens:

  "To focus on subjects at close range..., update fixed anywhere near the object, and then set focus-range up to LIMITlimiter; the focus range is limited to the range of big point. Similarly, when shooting subjects at an extreme range, set thefocus anywhere near the object and then set the limiter of development-range up to LIMIT; the focal range is limited to the range Far-getting to the point. Set the limiter of development-range FULL to allow the range of focus. »

  The SAL100M28 is a macro lens, and as such, it has a long beach of possible focus distances. In addition, in order to get the sharpest image possible, it adjusts the focus more slowly than a conventional lens. This means that should naturally be for some time to focus on a subject. The focus range limiter gives you the ability to limit the movement of the lens at half of its normal range, which speeds up the process.

  Do not use it at all ever, but it can help to to focus on your topic before it moves.

• Changes in XA Ultra ISO auto, focus macro hurt in auto mode

  Hello. There are a few bugs in XA ULTRA:
  (1) iso and SNA does not change. I take pictures with manual iso 100 or 200 or xxx, but change my auto iso, picture taken in auto, and EXIF iso is 100.
  (2) update bad auto macro:
  -Update
  -I take photo
  -Focusing again (?)
  -Bad picture
  picture sometimes 3) saves a lot of time.
  (4) Teleservice.apk still talking about data mobile connection/disconnection. If no signal if the signal is found, so reboot, so change 3g to 4g, plesae, stop! (
  PS I do restore the pc 2 times Guide

  Fixed with the update to the new firmware

• Apex 4 or 5 zoom function and macros and update questions

  Presently, got open users in Excel via odbc tables and I want to transfer to Apex.

  1. How can I reduce the Apex down police according to the Excel zoom feature so that more data gets to the screen.   I want a LOT of data on the screen, Ive got some end users who wish to up to 100 + rows and columns of 30 +, they don't mind the size and readability, the screens are big and have macros that are constantly highlighting changes to data they are interested in what brings us to question 2

  2. how macros script to Flash color changes.

  3. how data streams constantly modify data in a table live the Apex report and apply these macros.   Refresh rate?

  IM in dev with version 4, but if a feature isn't available until the level 5 I can hold off.

  Hello

  All the above mentioned requirements can be done in one of the APEX, version 4 or 5.

  1. it is a change of POLICE CSS based on the model of HTML page, and it is supported in the APEX 4 and 5 times.

  2. for changes from flashing color macros (formulas), you should design your SQL query and insert various HTML tags in SQL query results.

  3. updating of the page tables, can be programmed using jQuery functions.

  So, basically we expect 5 APEX as your condition does not use what is explicit to APEX 5.0 /.

  Thank you

  Sunil Bhatia

• Problem setting up block - HBR & Macros

  Hi all
  
  I need to create a macro that needs to copy some data from members account through the segmentNA and the ProductNA intersection. The following code creates no blocks.
  
  /******************* Macro *********************************/
  
  / * Push pilots to product and Segment NA * /.
  
  Difficulty (BegBalance, @Relative("YearTotal",0), PXXXX, SXX)
  
  "Acc10" = 'Acc10'-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc2" = "Acc2"-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc3" = "Acc3"-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc4" = 'Acc4'-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc5" = "Acc5"-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc6" = 'Acc6'-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  "Acc7" = "Acc7"-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  
  EndFix
  
  / * Push the drivers for all products and segments * /.
  Fix (BegBalance, @Relative("YearTotal",0))
  / * The UK % corporate tax rate * /.
  "Acc8" = 'Acc8'-> entity1-> work->->-> Local-> View1 SXX PXXXX;
  EndFix
  
  Account and the time period are dense Dim.
  
  Suggestions appreciated.

  As long as the script does what you want it and within an acceptable time, everything goes well with the world.
  My career has been with Fortune 100 + size companies (and their large amounts of data) so I never had the luxury of using "set createlockoneq on.

  Robert

• Automation/macro a hearing process

  Hi all

  This is my first post here and just I wanted to say thanks for all the questions and skills that have already been posted.

  I was wondering if anyone can help answer a question I have on the automation of a process of hearing?

  I would like to install a macro where the new files that are sent to my machine are detected and opened in the edition Audition mode, then automatically the following processes executed.

  1 (if it is possible to automate) take a noise sample, then select all and performance effects > restoration > noise [OK]

  2. all select and run effects > Amplitude and Compression > normalize (process) 100% [OK]

  3. all select and run effects > Amplitude and Compression > hard limiting (process) 40% or - 6 dB [OK]

  4. then run file > save as > [file name that somehow makes reference to the folder the original file was retrieved of]

  We need this same file to go at least 2 more programs to get the end result that we are looking for, but since it is a forum of the hearing, I will stay within that program for now.  Any help would be appreciated greately, or if you know someone who can do this kind of macro expansion, please let me know.

  Thanks to this forum and to Adobe for their great product!

  -John

  jc_ca wrote:

  I would like to install a macro where the new files that are sent to my machine are detected and opened in the edition Audition mode, then automatically the following processes executed.

  I fear that hearing does not support this type of macro. It runs the batch process, when a script can be run on a lot proposed to files, but because this facility is available, this means that there is a very important limitation in scripts:

  1 (if it is possible to automate) take a noise sample, then select all and performance effects > restoration > noise [OK]

  2. all select and run effects > Amplitude and Compression > Normalize (process) 100% [OK]

  3. all select and run effects > Amplitude and Compression > limiting the hard (process) 40% or - 6 dB [OK]

  4. then run File > Save As > [file name that somehow makes reference to the folder the original file was retrieved from]

  1) would go in a script, but it works with a fixed noise sample, which must be in a designated place in the script.

  ((2) and (3) the two would go into a single script without difficulty.

  (4) is the one which does not at all, under any circumstances. File > save under is not a supported operation in scripts. Because you can run a script in a batch file, it has been estimated at the time this was written accordingly, there had no direct need at all for the management of files in the script itself.

• I have someone just showed about 100 pictures of my iPad. Now, the pictures are missing, and the "recently deleted" folder is also empty. What can I do?

  I have someone just showed about 100 pictures of my iPad. Now, the pictures are missing, and the "recently deleted" folder is also empty. What can I do?

  Have you done something after their show.