SG 300 and WLC 2504

Similar Questions

• WLC 2504 cannot access the GUI...

  Hi all

  I'm not sure what I did wrong, the 2504 itself has only 4 ports and no port management but I heard it's actually port 1 (even if there are no labels for this). That's what I've done so far to try to access the GUI:

  in CLI mode, I have

  (1) put AP managament address like 10.151.55.129 255.255.255.224.

  (2) I have activated the adminmode on port 1, which I assume is management port and enabling admin mode is the same as "no shut" on switches I guess; Here is the command I entered:

  (Cisco Controller) config > adminmode port 1 turn on

  (3) enabled HTTPS/HTTP through commands:

  (Cisco Controller) config > activate network secureweb

  (Cisco Controller) config > activate network web-auth secureweb

  (Cisco Controller) config > network webmode enable

  (4) I then reset system and verify that the changes took place to help display the synthesis network, as shown below. I also activated mgmt via dynamic interface to see if it makes a difference:

  RF-network name... TEST_WIFI

  Web Mode.................................... Enable

  Secure Web view... Enable

  Secure Web Mode Cipher-Option high... Disable

  Secure Web SSLv2 Cipher-Option Mode... Disable

  Secure Web Mode RC4 Cipher preference... Disable

  OCSP........................................ People with disabilities

  Responder OCSP URL...

  Secure Shell (ssh)... Enable

  Telnet...................................... Disable

  Transfer Ethernet multicast... Disable

  Transfer of broadcast Ethernet... Disable

  Multicast/Broadcast AP mode... Address multicast: 225.225.225.225

  IGMP snooping... People with disabilities

  IGMP timeout... 60 seconds

  Interval between IGMP queries... 20 seconds

  MLD snooping... People with disabilities

  MLD timeout... 60 seconds

  Interval between MLD queries... 20 seconds

  Period of inactivity of the user... 300 seconds

  ARP timeout... 300 seconds

  Cisco AP by default Master... Disable

  Join AP priority... Disable

  Mgmt interface wireless... Disable

  Mgmt Via dynamic Interface... Enable

  Filter MAC bridge Config... Enable

  Safety of bridge mode... EAP

  Mesh full sector DFS... Enable

  Relief of AP... Enable

  Support CMCC Auth Web... People with disabilities

  Web Auth redirect Ports... 80.1

  Web Proxy Auth Redirect... Disable

  Bypass-Web Auth Captive... Disable

  Web secure Web Auth... Enable

  Quick change SSID... People with disabilities

  Discovery of the AP - IP NAT only... Activated

  IP/MAC Addr binding Check... Activated

  Status of CCX-lite... Disable

  oeap-600-WLAN-dual... Disable

  oeap-600 local-network... Enable

  mDNS snooping... People with disabilities

  mDNS interval between requests. 15 minutes

  (5) I installed my PORTABLE NIC to be 10.151.55.20 255.255.255.224 and connected to port 1 on wlc 2504; but I can't ping 10.151.55.29 nor do I navigate to https://10.151.55.29/. The port appears upwards (the flashing green lights on port 1 and Portable NIC also Flash).

  Any help would be appreciated

  If your connection to your laptop direct to port 1, then you have untagged the management vlan. Now you have configured for vlan 10, you must set to vlan 0.

  You will then be able to ping to the management interface and connect to it through the user interface.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• New authentication active directory on wlc 2504

  Hello

  There is problem with very often a new authentication for servers active directory. Every time only if:

  -loose client wlan/wifi because of the wifi hole or low RSSI

  -output of build for a while customer

  -wlan loose customer due to problem with homelessness (slow, not perfect)

  There is possibility to keep authenticated users? I had hope that options: sleep customer, max session timeout, max idle timeout

  help, but they do not work for me :(

  My access point (2702) are all in a group flexconnect. WLC 2504 (8.1.102.0). My security in WLAN config is:

  Layer2: wpa + wpa2, PSK

  Layer 3: web policy, authentication with LDAP servers + asleep on client

  I always try to improve the radio covers n fast roaming (11 k, r, v) but if someone leaves the area wifi, to do authenticated which is a little annoying...

  Thanks for any advice or an index

  Peter

  You want people who re - attach to your network for to re-authenticate.  It's a good thing.  We do not want people using the old credentials, or expose you to a security breach.

  This behavior is by design - and good.

• Don't WLC 2504 media HA or not?

  We have Cisco WLC 2504 (software version: 7.3.101.0) in our network and management access 10 points, we are now trying to build High Availability (HA) in the WLAN settings. So I need details that this existing platform is capable of supporting HA.

  Required clarification as follows.

  1 support WLC 2504 HA?
  2. If the AP is supported if a license is required to enable it.
  3. What is prerequisite software to enable it.
  4 Setup guide to enable HA

  Attached: existing WLC BOMs

  HA PA SSO:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps10315/products_tech_note09186a0080bd3504.shtml

  HA N + 1

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/technology/hi_avail/N1_HA_Overview.html

  AP high availability

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008064a294.shtml

  Thank you

  Scott

  Help others by using the rating system and marking answers questions as 'response '.

• a WLC 2504 does support mobility with WiSM1 on the 6500 Series group

  If a WLC 2504 supports the mobility with WiSM1 on the 6500 Series group.

  Model: WLC 2504
  Software version: 7.3.101.0

  Model: WiSM1
  Software version: 7.x.x.x

  Yes and no.

  Yes, mobility is supported.

  No, because I don't personally recommend inter-controleur of roaming.  It is true when you are dealing with 4400/WISN-1.  This is even truer when you WLC running two (or more) different codes.

• Cisco WLC 2504 internal DHCP does not work properly

  Hi all

  I m trials with a Cisco WLC 2504 and some APs of 1832. I set up a DHCP scope on the interface of the controller with 2

  a large number of different configurations, but the DHCP protocol does not work and Don t Access Point to obtain an IP address. My first question: is it possible to do DHCP for Access Points or only for wireless clients?

  These are my interfaces:

  Interfaces

  

  Interface of the PA-Manager:

  Interfaces1

  

  Interfaces2

  

  My DHCP scope:

  Scope1 DHCP

  

  Portee2 DHCP

  

  Advanced DHCP:

  DHCP Scope3

  

  I forgot something? Is there anyone using DHCP for its access points?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  On Cisco WLC internal DHCP, you can add the option 43 to say where APs must register. In this case, they will try to resolve the DNS CISCO-CAPWAP-CONTROLLER or CISCO-LWAPP entry.

  Let me explain briefly how AP-Manager works on WLC:

  1. Boots of Access Point and sends a discovery request to the management interface of the controller using the intellectual property you configured as DHCP Option 43 (as described above, it can be resolved by the DNS entry)
  2. Controller, sends it a response discovered that contains the name of the system, addresses AP-Manager, the number of access points already connected to each interface AP-Manager and the overall capacity of the controller.
  3. Joints access point controller using the less loaded interface AP Manager.

  With this, every AP Manager must have a good configured interface and be connected to a different port, no LAG.

  I drop a post here sometimes there is which might help:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/118311/configuring-multiple-AP-...

  Thank you

  PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as correct answer if this answered your question

• WLC 2504 with AP 1121 g

  Hey there,

  I have a problem, maybe you can help me.

  I want to join the FOLD of the AIR-AP1121G-E-K9 to a WLC 2504 with software version 7.4.x.

  In the compatibility matrix, I saw that it is only possible if the WLC has 7.0.x software version.

  So my questions are:

  1. Why is it needable to upgrade the 7.0.x to 7.4.x WLC?

  2. is it possible to join the AP1121G a WLC 2504 with 7.4.x version?

  3. What is the difference between version 7.0.x and 7.4.x

  I hope you can help me

  Yes.  That is right.  You need to downgrade the firmware of your WLC to 7.0.X to allow the APs 1100.

  Make sure that you back up your configuration before the downgrading of your firmware.

• Qosmio X 300 and X 500-slow game performance

  Hello guys.

  I just got a new X 500 - 11 c less then a week ago. I've tried on wow and some of the new games like Bad Company 2 the two Online (on internet fiberPro 50/50). I must say that I'm really really disappointed. Both the X 500 and X 300 get so hot that I run both of the game at so low FPS I'm beginning to wonder if games really work.

  I have to say that both the X 300 and X 500 I tested with parameters "stright out of the box. But both have the same problem, they get hot, FPS drops and I pursuit get tired of running see ppl FPS jump from one end of my monitor to another because of the low FPS. Wow an SPF of 8-12 in a 5-25man raid.

  I have I have both tried to reinstall Windows 7 with system recovery and in both cases, it's the same thing, the com works fine until I have try and play a game. The surface under the monitor get so cabin that I can't hold my hand to her, and they all have two running so low FPS what it is no joy to play on them at all. I mean I can understand with some of the new games they can execute heavy but WoW is a game 5 year strand, the old system of gfx 32bits, I perform better on my old xxxx-mobile it is 5 years old and got a 256 in GfX card.

  Now, I tried to change the main HDD on a disc SSD of Pentecost and reinstall Windows 7 page home Toshiba + since the Toshiba training center to drive all the. That helped a little but not the STCUM.

  So I wonder, am I just out of luck I do something wrong or have I received 2 Toshiba laptops that have some bad material?

  I want to say that I have got this new because on the Toshibas home page, it says:
  x high-performance computer laptop, with all the latest features
  x multi-core processors allow you to do more at once
  x-recommended for extreme and multimedia games

  I hope that this extreme game of Pentecost they do not mean Tetris ore bubblebuble.

  My friend has a X 500 and it works fine.

  Your room is well ventilated?
  How long have you had the X 500? Maybe there is accumulation of dust in the radiator.
  Also make sure that the ventilation openings are not obstructed.

• Cisco WLC 2504 with AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9

  Hello

  Can you help me for some info about AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9.

  I have a wlc 2504, but I don't know if the AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9-supported 2504 wlc.

  Can work this WLC 2504 with AIR-AP1131AG-A-K9 solution?

  If so, guide.

  Thank you very much

  Gezimv

  Check out this link. As long as you have software version 8.0.x 2504 version you can use 1131 AP with it. Nothing beyond software fate is more a series of support 1131.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/wireless/compatibility/matrix/compatibility-matrix.html#56735

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.

• Cisco WLC 2504 - Access Points do not reach the controller

  Hello world

  We bougth a Cisco WLC 2504 with two AIR-AP2702I-UXK9 Access Points. The problem is that the AP do not join the WLC.
  The output from 'show join ap stats' shows the following:

  (Cisco Controller) > view join ap stats summary all the

  Database Mac EthernetMac AP AP name IP address Status
  00:35: 1a: B1:A9:60 00:f2:8 b: f4:1 has: 9 c AP00f2.8bf4.1a9c 192.168.10.23 joined not
  00:35: 1a: C9:99:B0 00:f2:8 b: 77:b7:fc AP00f2.8b77.b7fc not joined 192.168.10.24

  (Cisco Controller) > show join ap 00:35:1 detailed stats to: b1:a9:60

  Synchronization phase statistics
  -For the synchronization request has received... Does not apply
  -For the synchronization completed... Does not apply

  Discovery phase statistics
  -Applications received discovered... 114
  -Answers success of discovery... 114
  -Discovery failure processing... 0
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt of discovery... Does not apply
  -Attempt to finally successful discovery time... 20:15:40.106 16 June
  -Discovery attempt ultimately unsuccessful time... Does not apply

  Join the live statistics
  -Join applications received... 57
  -Join sent successful responses... 57
  -Processing of the join request without success... 0
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt to join... Does not apply
  -Attempt to join finally managed time... 20:15:50.414 16 June
  -Join finally failed time... Does not apply

  Configuration phase statistics

  -Configuration requests... 114
  -Answers configuration successful... 0
  -Processing configuration failed... 57
  -Purpose of the last unsuccessful attempt to Setup... Invalid license in the application configuration
  -Attempt to finally successful configuration time... Does not apply
  -Time finally failed configuration attempt... 20:15:50.810 16 June

  Last the decryption of the AP details failure messages
  -Last message decryption failure reason... Does not apply

  Details of recent disconnection AP
  -Last AP connection failure reason... Does not apply
  -Last reason for disconnection AP... Unknown failure reason

  Latest summary join error
  -Type of error that occurred in the last... Application of configuration rejected LWAPP
  -Reason for the error that took place the last... Invalid license in the application configuration
  -Time which occurred the last error to join... 20:15:50.810 16 June

  Details of sign-out AP
  -Last AP connection failure reason... Does not apply
  Ethernet Mac: c 00:f2:8 b: f4:1 has: 9 Ip address: 192.168.10.23

  Would be grateful for the help.

  Best regards
  Marc

  Hi Marc,

  Make sure first that your controller has software code 8.0.x or above, if first better it. Here's the code recommended by TAC

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-LAN-Controller-software/200046-TAC-recommended-AireOS.html

  Then, try the UX above deployment guide to begin. Under Advanced tab WLAN, you need to enable "of the first universal ap' in order to use this app provisioning & connect to the AP.

  If you have more than 1 AP, then you must start 1AP using this application. Other access points that you can feed them upward, while AP original is also powered, so they'll use protocal called NDP & start them automatically

  Let us know how it goes

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.

• Problems with towers 1252 and WLC 4400

  I have problem with performance customers 1252 tours and WLC 4400. When clients are connected, they have slow transfer, about 800 ms in the ping command. Can someone help me?

  What about the APs event logs?

• Encrypted L3 Communications between the TOWER and WLC?

  Hi all

  I work with a client who wants to put the towers away to their WLC (a 4402). The problem is that communications between the TOWER and WLC must be secured, even through their private Wan! I have a few questions that result, if someone is able to help you;

  1. I can't know if and what method of encryption is (is it AES etc.?) used on connections between towers and the WLC and what are the steps?
     1. The terminology can be a problem here, it's not a wireless mesh, just classic LAP for WLC
  2. EXTENSIVE customer network is already encrypted (IPSec VPN via VPLS) in parts - what is the consequence of execution of AP<-->WLC with end to end (if possible) on a network encryption EXTENDED with IPSec, i.e. double encryption?

  Strange but true - pointers will be greatly appreciated... Phil.C

  With a controller of the 4400 series, the control traffic between the AP and the regulator is already encrypted AES.  The user traffic is not encrypted.  If you use a 5508 controller all traffic between the AP and the controller is encrypted AES.

  For what is running the traffic through a VPN, it should work.  The issue I see with this is with the MTU in general.  The controller will drop all packets with a payload of less than 32bytes data.  According to the MTU over the VPN I've seen packets getting fragmented and it is a question.  If you use one of the versions CAPWAP (5.2 or newer) discovery dynamic MTU is part of the Protocol and this MTU problem does not really exist.

• Protocols for switches 300 and 500 series

  These protocols are supported by the 300 and 500 series switches?

  • TCP
  • UDP/Unicast
  • UDP/Multicast
  • UPnP
  • RTCP
  • RTSP

  Thank you

  Dear Alejandro,

  If you mean the switch weather can pass through these protocols the answer is a definitive Yes. If you meant something can else you please describe what you mean?

  For example, THAT TCP is supported in a way that it can filter traffic based on the TCP port (layer feature 3 +), so can he do to UDP. Multicast is also managed through IGMP support. About RTCP and RTSP how / why would you use it?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Zsolt

• ISE and WLC for sanitation of the posture

  Please can someone clarify a few things regarding the ISE and posture wireless.

  (1) is the ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT used for conversion, or is it just an ACL to redirect some of the posture of the kickoff checking traffic?

  (2) can / a dACL/wACL list must be specified as a sanitation ACL?

  (3) the WLC ACL should be written in long format (manually specify source and dest ports/doesny direction any job?)

  (4) does anyone have working example ACL for redirect (CPC) posture and sanitation (dACL)?

  (5) any other advice or pointers would be as useful as any docs I have found so far, what he TrustSec2, CiscoLive or anything else, do not seem to help me understand sanitation and WLC posture

  Thank you

  Nick

  Yes,

  This means that strategy available to your customer does not have a rule that will correspond to an entrepreneur who joined the network. Can you post a screenshot of the provisioning of customer policy?

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• X 300 and X 301 laptop DVD-ROM is the same?

  That is my question. And if they are it possible to set the DVD-ROM X 300 laptop for X 301?

  Advance Thanx ina!

  Nikola

  Hi, johnnykola

  I did some research on the Lenovo Web site and found these two documents: X 300 and X 301 spare parts for the system. According to these documents, the optical drive for both systems is exactly the same. So, in theory, you should be able to put one inside the other. However, I've never tried, nor have I heard of someone else doing one, so just know that it may not work for reasons unknown.

  It will be useful,

  Adam