Site to Site IPSEC tunnel (5505 at 5505) blocking certain ports?
I have problems with the traffic between two connected 5505 at 5505 sites (lan to lan) ipsec tunnel. feature of 99% of the traffic on the tunnel seems good with one exception. When a pc on Site A tries to access a mangagment base tool (java embedded) web for an IP_PBX to the site B, part of the traffic does not result in an odd error. The client pc can ping and hit port 80 to prompt the web GUI, gets invited to download java and load the java web application embedded. The java application itself (a terminal CLI to replicate if you were just Telnet to) gives an error as it cannot successfully connect to the IP_PBX. We have other sites where the ipsec tunnel is between two 2800's, and there is NO problem. The provider IP_PBX suggest that we open port 2000. Personally I'm not familiar with the ASA to uderstand why he would block only certain ports on an ipsec tunnel. I'm particularly confused because there is no NAT'ing involved in trafficking through this tunnel ipsec 5505 to 5505.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated,
BH
I can post configs if necessary, but thought someone might be already familiar with this issue.
Thanks again.
Ok.
What is stable with the ACL I mentioned:
test2000 list access permitted tcp/udp any host x.x.x.x eq 2000
test2000 ip access list allow a whole
Access-group interface inside test2000
The idea is to check if the ASA transfers traffic x.x.x.x on port 2000 coming out to the inside network.
If you see hitcounts on the first statement, the ASA transfers the packets and the problem is maybe with the server itelf or return circulation.
Federico.
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
remote users access site ipsec tunnel
How to configure the ACL and the road to allow remote users access to site ipsec as local users?
Current scenario is
1. distance users (192.168.2.0/24) ipsec <->Cisco 870 (192.168.0.0/24)
(2 cisco 870(192.168.0.0/24) ipsec tunnel <->cisco 1811 (10.0.0.0/24)
Now remote users can access the 192.168.0.0 network, no problem, but how they can access 10.0.0.0 network?
I guess I can do like this:
1. in cisco 870, site to site ip 192.168.0.0 tunnel allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
(add) permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
2. in the site-to-site vpn cisco 1811
(add) permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
3. in settings vpn split cisco870 add the 10.0.0.0/24 network
Is this fair?
Thank you.
You must configure the interesting traffic that an ACL contains the source is remote destination as local LAN and LAN.
->-> -
VPN site to site - IPSEC TUNNEL
I have 2 servers that communicate with each other, using a middleware which has no NAT support.
This middleware, named RTI DDS uses multicast packets.
I need to place the 2 servers in 2 different cities.
On each location, I have a router connected to the other end with a dedicated line.
The version of the IOS on the cisco routers is ADVANCED (the one with the cryptographic features)
The middleware using NAT (which cache servers IP address) cannot work.
A VPN between my two sites can solve my problems of communication?
If so, I'll show what I did (maybe I did something wrong in the creation of VPN).
Because I am tring to create a VPN with an IPSEC TUNNEL
Thank you.
Emanuele
Emanuele
The first several times I have lived these configs I was concentrating on the ISAKMP and IPSec - aspects and did not find a problem with them. Then after you posted my answer I went through the congfigs once again, and I think I see the problem. There is no routing information in the configs. If Site_Router does not know where 172.27.1.0/24. When the server on its local network attempts to ping the server else she has no way to transfer the package. And the same CO_Router don't know how to get to 172.27.2.0.
If solve you the problem with the routing information, I think that the ISAKMP negotiation can work.
HTH
Rick
-
ASA 5505 and ASA 5510 Site to Site VPN Tunnel cannot be established
Hi all experts
We are now plan to form an IPSec VPN tunnel from site to site between ASA 5505 (ASA Version 8.4) and ASA 5510 (ASA Version 8.0) but failed, would you please show me how to establish? A reference guide?
I got error syslog 713902 and 713903, how to fix?
I got the following, when I type "sh crypto isakmp his."
Type: user role: initiator
Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG2
Hugo
Hello
This State is reached when the policies of the phase 1 do not correspond to the two ends.
Please confirm that you have the same settings of phase 1 on both sides with the following commands:
See the isakmp crypto race
See the race ikev1 crypto
Also make sure that port UDP 500 and 4500 are open for communication between your device and the remote peer.
Finally, make sure you have a route suitable for the remote VPN endpoint device.
Hope that helps.
Kind regards
Dinesh Moudgil
-
Hi-
We have connected tunnel / VPN configuration between an ASA 5505 - worm = 8.4 (7) and 5512 - worm = 9.2 (3).
We can only ping in a sense - 5505 to the 5512, but not of vice-versa(5512 to 5505).Networks:
Local: 192.168.1.0 (answering machine)
Distance: 192.168.54.0 (initiator)See details below on our config:
SH run card cry
card crypto outside_map 2 match address outside_cryptomap_ibfw
card crypto outside_map 2 pfs set group5
outside_map 2 peer XX crypto card game. XX.XXX.XXX
card crypto outside_map 2 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA ikev1
crypto map outside_map 2 set ikev2 AES256 ipsec-proposaloutside_map interface card crypto outside
Note:
Getting to hit numbers below on rules/ACL...SH-access list. I have 54.0
permit for access list 6 outside_access_out line scope ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 15931) 0x01aecbcc
permit for access list 1 outside_cryptomap_ibfw line extended ip object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 object NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671
access-list 1 permit line outside_cryptomap_ibfw extended ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0 (hitcnt = 3) 0xa75f0671SH run | I have access-group
Access-group outside_access_out outside interfaceNOTE:
WE have another working on the 5512 - VPN tunnel we use IKE peer #2 below (in BOLD)...HS cry his ikev1
IKEv1 SAs:
HIS active: 2
Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
Total SA IKE: 21 peer IKE: XX. XX.XXX.XXX
Type: L2L role: answering machine
Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE
2 IKE peers: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
Type: L2L role: answering machine
Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVESH run tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX
tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX General-attributes
Group - default policy - GroupPolicy_XX.XXX.XXX.XXX
tunnel-group XX. XX.XXX.XXX ipsec-attributes
IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
remote control-IKEv2 pre-shared-key authentication *.SH run | I have political ikev1
ikev1 160 crypto policy
preshared authentication
aes-256 encryption
Group 5
life 86400SH run | I Dynamics
NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interfaceNOTE:
To from 5512 at 5505-, we can ping a host on the remote network of ASA local# ping inside the 192.168.54.20
Type to abort escape sequence.
Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 192.168.54.20, wait time is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 per cent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 30/32/40 msDetermination of 192.168.1.79 - local host route to 192.168.54.20 - remote host - derivation tunnel?
The IPSEC tunnel check - seems OK?
SH crypto ipsec his
Interface: outside
Tag crypto map: outside_map, seq num: 2, local addr: XX.XXX.XXX.XXXoutside_cryptomap_ibfw to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.54.0 255.255.255.0
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.54.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer: XX. XX.XXX.XXX#pkts program: 4609, #pkts encrypt: 4609, #pkts digest: 4609
#pkts decaps: 3851, #pkts decrypt: 3851, #pkts check: 3851
compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
#pkts uncompressed: 4609, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
success #frag before: 0, failures before #frag: 0, #fragments created: 0
Sent #PMTUs: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, reassembly: 20th century / of frgs #decapsulated: 0
#TFC rcvd: 0, #TFC sent: 0
#Valid errors ICMP rcvd: 0, #Invalid ICMP errors received: 0
#send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0local crypto endpt. : XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/0, remote Start crypto. : XX. XX.XXX.XXX/0
Path mtu 1500, ipsec 74 (44) generals, media, mtu 1500
PMTU time remaining: 0, political of DF: copy / df
Validation of ICMP error: disabled, TFC packets: disabled
current outbound SPI: CDC99C9F
current inbound SPI: 06821CBBSAS of the esp on arrival:
SPI: 0x06821CBB (109190331)
transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3914789/25743)
Size IV: 16 bytes
support for replay detection: Y
Anti-replay bitmap:
0xFFFFFFFF to 0xFFFFFFFF
outgoing esp sas:
SPI: 0xCDC99C9F (3452542111)
transform: aes-256-esp esp-sha-hmac no compression
running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel, group 5 PFS, IKEv1}
slot: 0, id_conn: 339968, crypto-card: outside_map
calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (3913553/25743)
Size IV: 16 bytes
support for replay detection: Y
Anti-replay bitmap:
0x00000000 0x00000001--> The local ASA 5512 - where we have questions - tried Packet Tracer... seems we receive requests/responses...
SH cap CAP
34 packets captured
1: 16:41:08.120477 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo request
2: 16:41:08.278138 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
3: 16:41:08.278427 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
4: 16:41:09.291992 192.168.54.20 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
5: 16:41:09.292282 192.168.1.79 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply--> On the ASA 5505 distance - we can ping through the 5512 to the local host (192.168.1.79)
SH cap A2
42 packets captured
1: 16:56:16.136559 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
2: 16:56:16.168860 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
3: 16:56:17.140434 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
4: 16:56:17.171652 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
5: 16:56:18.154426 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request
6: 16:56:18.186178 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.1.79 #1 > 192.168.54.20: icmp: echo reply
7: 16:56:19.168417 802. 1 q vlan P0 192.168.54.20 #1 > 192.168.1.79: icmp: echo request--> Package trace on 5512 does no problem... but we cannot ping from host to host?
entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.1.79 8 0 detailed 192.168.54.20
Phase: 4
Type: CONN-SETTINGS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
class-map default class
match any
Policy-map global_policy
class class by default
Decrement-ttl connection set
global service-policy global_policy
Additional information:
Direct flow from returns search rule:
ID = 0x7fffa2d0ba90, priority = 7, area = conn-set, deny = false
hits = 4417526, user_data = 0x7fffa2d09040, cs_id = 0 x 0, use_real_addr, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
input_ifc = output_ifc = any to inside,Phase: 5
Type: NAT
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
Additional information:
Definition of dynamic 192.168.1.79/0 to XX.XXX.XXX.XXX/43904
Direct flow from returns search rule:
ID = 0x7fffa222d130, priority = 6, area = nat, deny = false
hits = 4341877, user_data = 0x7fffa222b970, cs_id = 0 x 0, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol
IP/ID=0.0.0.0 SRC, mask = 0.0.0.0, port = 0, = 0 tag
IP/ID=0.0.0.0 DST, mask is 0.0.0.0, port = 0, tag = 0, dscp = 0 x 0
input_ifc = inside, outside = output_ifc...
Phase: 14
Type: CREATING STREAMS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional information:
New workflow created with the 7422689 id, package sent to the next module
Information module for forward flow...
snp_fp_tracer_drop
snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
snp_fp_inspect_icmp
snp_fp_translate
snp_fp_adjacency
snp_fp_fragment
snp_ifc_statInformation for reverse flow...
snp_fp_tracer_drop
snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
snp_fp_translate
snp_fp_inspect_icmp
snp_fp_adjacency
snp_fp_fragment
snp_ifc_statResult:
input interface: inside
entry status: to the top
entry-line-status: to the top
output interface: outside
the status of the output: to the top
output-line-status: to the top
Action: allow--> On remote ASA 5505 - Packet track is good and we can ping remote host very well... dunno why he "of Nations United-NAT?
Destination - initiator:
entry Packet-trace within the icmp 192.168.54.20 8 0 detailed 192.168.1.79
...
Phase: 4
Type: UN - NAT
Subtype: static
Result: ALLOW
Config:
NAT (inside, outside) static source NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.54.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 NETWORK_OBJ_192.168.1.0_24 non-proxy-arp-search of route static destination
Additional information:
NAT divert on exit to the outside interface
Untranslate 192.168.1.79/0 to 192.168.1.79/0
...Summary:
We "don't" ping from a host (192,168.1.79) on 5512 - within the network of the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20).
But we can ping the 5505 - inside the network host (192.168.54.20) 5512 - inside the network host (192.168.1.79).Please let us know what other details we can provide to help solve, thanks for any help in advance.
-SP
Well, I think it is a NAT ordering the issue.
Basically as static and this NAT rule-
NAT interface dynamic obj - 0.0.0.0 source (indoor, outdoor)
are both in article 1 and in this article, it is done on the order of the rules so it does match the dynamic NAT rule rather than static because that seems to be higher in the order.
To check just run a 'sh nat"and this will show you what order everthing is in.
The ASA is working its way through the sections.
You also have this-
NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface
which does the same thing as first statement but is in section 3, it is never used.
If you do one of two things-
(1) configure the static NAT statement is above the dynamic NAT in section 1 that is to say. You can specify the command line
or
(2) remove the dynamic NAT of section 1 and then your ASA will use the entry in section 3.
There is a very good document on this site for NAT and it is recommended to use section 3 for your general purpose NAT dynamic due precisely these questions.
It is interesting on your ASA 5505 you duplicated your instructions of dynamic NAT again but this time with article 2 and the instructions in section 3 that is why your static NAT works because he's put in correspondence before all your dynamic rules.
The only thing I'm not sure of is you remove the dynamic NAT statement in article 1 and rely on the statement in section 3, if she tears the current connections (sorry can't remember).
Then you can simply try to rearrange so your static NAT is above it just to see if it works.
Just in case you want to see the document here is the link-
Jon
-
Impossible to establish vpn site to site between asa 5505 5510 year
Hi all experts
We are now plan to form an IPSec VPN tunnel from site to site between ASA 5505 (ASA Version 8.4) and ASA 5510 (ASA Version 8.0) but failed, would you please show me how to establish? A reference guide?
Hugo
Here are the links to the guides-cisco config:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/site2sit.html
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/vpn_site2site.html
In addition to VPN, you need to consider in NAT exemption:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/configuration/guide/cfgnat.html#wp1043541
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/nat_overview.html#wpxref25608
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/nat_rules.html#wp1232160
And many examples:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/prod_configuration_examples_list.html
--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni -
ASA ASA from Site to Site VPN IPSec Tunnel
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
I have two devices Cisco ASA with a Site for the configuration of the tunnel VPN IPSec Site as follows: -.
Site #1 - Cisco ASA running version 8.2 (1) with an internal range of 10.0.0.x/24
Site #2 - Cisco ASA running version 8.2 (1) with an internal range of 10.1.1.x/24
Site #1 is simple and has a dynamic NAT rule which translates all of the inside and the outside (public IP) of the SAA.
Internet access works very well in all workstations of this site. A static route is configured to redirect all traffic to a public router upstream.
Site #2 is slightly more complicated; the Cisco ASA is configured with 10.1.1.254/24 as its interior IP address and 10.1.2.254/24 as its external IP address. A dynamic NAT rule is configured to translate everything inside as the 10.1.2.254 (outside) address of the ASA. A default static route is then configured to redirect all traffic to a Draytek device on 10.1.2.253. This device then performs its own private Public NAT. Again the Internet works fine all hosts inside the Cisco ASA (10.1.1.x)
The IPSec tunnel is created with the networks local and remote endpoint as above (10.0.0.x/24) and (10.1.1.x/24). The Draytek at the Site #2 device is configured with a form of DMZ that allows essentially ALL traffic toward the front directly on the external interface of the ASA (10.1.2.254). The Phase 1 and Phase 2 negotiation of the tunnel ends correctly, and the tunnel is formed without any problem. However, all traffic passing on networks ICMP does not end and the Syslog reports the following-
Site #1-
6 January 19, 2011 15:27:21 302020 ZEFF-SB-01_LAN 1 10.1.1.51 0 Built of outbound ICMP connection for faddr 10.1.1.51/0 gaddr ZEFF-SB-01_LAN/1 laddr ZEFF-SB-01_LAN/1 6 January 19, 2011 15:27:23 302021 10.1.1.51 0 ZEFF-SB-01_LAN 1 Connection of ICMP disassembly for faddr 10.1.1.51/0 gaddr ZEFF-SB-01_LAN/1 laddr ZEFF-SB-01_LAN/1 Site #2-
6 January 19, 2011 15:24:47 302020 10.1.1.51 0 10.0.0.30 1 Built of outbound ICMP connection for faddr gaddr laddr 10.1.1.51/0 10.1.1.51/0 10.0.0.30/1 6 January 19, 2011 15:24:49 302021 10.0.0.30 1 10.1.1.51 0 Connection of disassembly for faddr gaddr laddr 10.1.1.51/0 10.1.1.51/0 10.0.0.30/1 ICMP It's the same for any form of traffic passing over the tunnel. The ACL is configured to allow segments of LAN out to any destination. At this point, I left scratching my head, as my original theory was to blame the Draytek, but after reading the documentation given to the DMZ host configuration, it appears this parameter is configured all traffic is simply forwarded to the IP address (in this case, the Cisco ASA interface outside).
Anyone can shed light on a possible cause of this problem?
Thank you
Nick
did you bypass the vpn traffic between 10.0.0 and 10.1.1 to be NAT - ed on the two ASA?
Please provide the following information
-set up the tunnel
-show the isa cry his
-show the ipsec cry his
-ping of the site 1 site 2 via tunnel
-capture "crypto ipsec to show his" once again
-ping from site 2 to 1 by the tunnel of the site
-capture "crypto ipsec to show his" once again
-two ASA configuration.
-
I purchased Mikrotik hardware devices and want to use routeros seat firewall cisco asa establish VPN. Aims to establish that a branch may be two IPSEC VPN access devices at the headquarters of the server via the public network.
But now, I'm having some trouble, so I have cisco asa branches and headquarters to establish successful ipsec vpn.
(1) branch routeros WAN port using a private IP address and is a member of the asa above outdoor sound created vpn ipsec, vpn successfully established internal servers and I ping the switch at the headquarters of the branch. However, there is a problem, I go through routeros visit that the headquarters of the https server pages can not be opened, telnet internal switches can telnet to the top, but were unable to penetrate into the character.
(2) in addition, I left the branch routeros on a public IP address WAN port and asa VPN IPSEC created seat, said problems above are not, the server can also be accessed, telnet switch can also enter text and control.
At the present time, I have encountered this problem of interface not CAN not because I need to create of very, very many industries and the need to establish headquarters communications branch offices so I have to use private IP addresses to access the Wan, unable to do wan are public IP address and headquarters to establish IPSEC VPN.now, I can't telnet asa inside the cisco router and open the web inside https, I can't solve the problems.
now, registrants of asa:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP 49.239.3.10 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 172.17.0.111 255.255.255.0network of the object inside
172.17.1.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
network outsidevpn object
Subnet 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0QQQ
NAT (inside, outside) static source inside inside destination static outsidevpn outsidevpn non-proxy-arp-search to itinerary
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 49.239.3.1 1
Route inside 172.17.1.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.0.5 1Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ikev1 cisco
Crypto ipsec pmtu aging infinite - the security association
Crypto dynamic-map cisco 1000 set pfs
Crypto dynamic-map cisco 1000 set transform-set cisco ikev1
Crypto dynamic-map cisco 1000 value reverse-road
Cisco-cisco ipsec isakmp dynamic 1000 card crypto
cisco interface card crypto outside
trustpool crypto ca policy
Crypto isakmp nat-traversal 60
Crypto ikev1 allow outside
IKEv1 crypto policy 10
preshared authentication
3des encryption
md5 hash
Group 2
life 86400IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultL2LGroup
IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.Hello
Could you share the output of the counterpart of its IPSec cry see the 49.239.3.10 of the other device?
Kind regards
Aditya
-
Static - VPN Site to Site DMVPN Tunnel
Hello
I have two sites, Site-a with Cisco ASA 5505 static IP Configuration & Site-B 1841 Cisco ISR with dynamic IP Configuration.
See the diagram attached for a glimpse.
The goal is to have the tunnel VPN Site to Site between the site of two so that desktop sitting in Site B can access the server applications residing in the Site-A.
Please suggest
Concerning
@Mohammed
Hello
A site to Site IPSec, the ASA is the static side and he should have the 'dynamic' configuration, and the side Dynamics SRI 1841 should have the static side:
I'll give an example configuration to achieve, but you can use a different encryption algorithms:
ASA 5505:
Phase 1:
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
3des encryption
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultL2LGrouppre-shared-key cisco123 -
ISA500 site by site ipsec VPN with Cisco IGR
Hello
I tried a VPN site by site work with Openswan and Cisco 2821 router configuration an Ipsec tunnel to site by site with Cisco 2821 and ISA550.
But without success.
my config for openswan, just FYI, maybe not importand for this problem
installation of config
protostack = netkey
nat_traversal = yes
virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12,%4:!$RIGHT_SUBNET
nhelpers = 0
Conn rz1
IKEv2 = no
type = tunnel
left = % all
leftsubnet=192.168.5.0/24
right =.
rightsourceip = 192.168.1.2
rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24
Keylife 28800 = s
ikelifetime 28800 = s
keyingtries = 3
AUTH = esp
ESP = aes128-sha1
KeyExchange = ike
authby secret =
start = auto
IKE = aes128-sha1; modp1536
dpdaction = redΘmarrer
dpddelay = 30
dpdtimeout = 60
PFS = No.
aggrmode = no
Config Cisco 2821 for dynamic dialin:
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA aes
sha hash
preshared authentication
Group 5
lifetime 28800
!
card crypto CMAP_1 1-isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP_1
!
access-list 102 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-SHA1 esp - aes esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP_1 1
game of transformation-ESP-AES-SHA1
match address 102
!
ISAKMP crypto key
address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ISAKMP crypto keepalive 30 periodicals
!
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.4002
card crypto CMAP_1
!
I tried ISA550 a config with the same constelations, but without suggesting.
Anyone has the same problem?
And had anyone has a tip for me, or has someone expirense with a site-by-site with ISA550 and Cisco 2821 ipsec tunnel?
I can successfully establish a tunnel between openswan linux server and the isa550.
Patrick,
as you can see on newspapers, the software behind ISA is also OpenSWAN
I have a facility with a 892 SRI running which should be the same as your 29erxx.
Use your IOS Config dynmap, penny, you are on the average nomad. If you don't have any RW customer you shoul go on IOS "No.-xauth" after the isakmp encryption key.
Here is my setup, with roardwarrior AND 2, site 2 site.
session of crypto consignment
logging crypto ezvpn
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 2
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
lifetime 28800
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 3
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 4
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 5
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
life 7200
ISAKMP crypto address XXXX XXXXX No.-xauth key
XXXX XXXX No.-xauth address isakmp encryption key
!
ISAKMP crypto client configuration group by default
key XXXX
DNS XXXX
default pool
ACL easyvpn_client_routes
PFS
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac FEAT
!
dynamic-map crypto VPN 20
game of transformation-FEAT
market arriere-route
!
!
card crypto client VPN authentication list by default
card crypto VPN isakmp authorization list by default
crypto map VPN client configuration address respond
10 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map
Description of VPN - 1
defined peer XXX
game of transformation-FEAT
match the address internal_networks_ipsec
11 VPN ipsec-isakmp crypto map
VPN-2 description
defined peer XXX
game of transformation-FEAT
PFS group2 Set
match the address internal_networks_ipsec2
card crypto 20-isakmp dynamic VPN ipsec VPN
!
!
Michael
Please note all useful posts
-
SA520w routing through site-to-site VPN tunnels
I have several offices that are connected using site-to-site VPN tunnels and all will use the SA520W (firmware 2.1.18). I currently have 3 routers in place, router tunnels created for the router B and c of router. I need assistance with the configuration to allow the guests to router site B get to the router site C. I have attempted to add a static route, but get a destination unreachable host trying to ping. Also, if I connect to the router site has via the Cisco VPN client, I'm not able to get resources on each site, B, or C.
A - the site 10.10.0.0/24
Site B - 10.0.0.0/24
Site of the C - 10.25.0.0/24
Any help is greatly appreciated.
So, that's what you have configured correctly?
RTR_A
||
_____________ || ___________
|| ||
RTR_B RTR_C
Since there is no tunnel between B and C there is no way for us past that traffic through RTR_A for two reasons. The most important reason is that subnet 10.25.0.0/24 (rtr_c) is not allowed to pass through the IPSec tunnel (it's okay to IPSec?) of rtr_a ==> rtr_b. You can't just add a statement of road because your addresses are not routable which is the reason why it fails.
Your only option is to create another tunnel between rtr_b and rtr_c. This may not be the ONLY option, but you should get what you need.
I hope this helps.
-
Hello
I'll get an ASA 5520, and put it in our main office as a VPN router. also, we have 20 to 25 remote users who need VPN access to HQ. some of them have already Sonicwall TZ-100 and some are already using VPN client. I get a Cisco router for remote users. Could you please let me know which device cisco (Hardware) is better for end users? also, most of them have dynamic IP on their DSL lines. is this ok with Cisco to establish a tunnel with a device that has a dynamic IP address?
Thank you
Mike
Hello
To find out which platform would be ideal, please check that:
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/prod_models_comparison.html
Usually for small offices a 5505 works very well, but it depends on your needs.
On the other hand, it does not matter if the remote end has a dynamic IP address, please check that:
Thank you.
Portu.
Please note any workstation that will be useful.
-
SBS 2008 office1 Serv2008 Office 2 need to share assets between them via a site to site VPN tunnel
Hi all.
I really need help on this one.
The office 1 installer running SBS2008 Office 2 running Server 2008.
Each firm has its own FQDN Office 1 CompanyABC 2 A_B_C of the company office.
Each firm has its own internal IP address pool Office 1 192.168.69.xxx and office 192.168.20.xxx 2.
Site to site VPN tunnel between 2 office routers Netgear SRX5308 1 and 2 Netgear FVS318G Office established and working.
Each firm has its own DNS server and acts as a domain controller
How to configure the 2 networks to see each other and be able to use assets on every network (files, printers)?
Is it so simple that the addition of another pool internal IP for each DNS server?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hello
Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.
I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.
https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver
"Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials online help"
https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/home-client.aspx
TechNet Server forums.
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer
See you soon.
-
Using the same set processing on several site to site VPN tunnels
Hi all. I have a rather strange situation about site-to-site VPN tunnel.
On the one hand, I have a PIX 501 and on the other end an ASA5505 and a tunnel set up between them.
The problem is that on the side of the PIX, I can't establish a tunnel, but when the traffic starts on the side of the ASA the tunnel established as usual.
I checked the configurations on both ends and keys, passwords, mirror that LCD seems OK. The only thing that comes to my attention, it's that I have the same set of transformation used for 2 different tunnel on the side of PIX.
Can I use the same set of transformation on several tunnels or should I set a different transformation for each tunnel? Could be the source of the problem?
Use it on PIX
card crypto set pfs group2
Or on ASA, use:
card crypto set pfs Group1
-
Keep Site to Site VPN Tunnel active for monitoring
Hi all
I have a configured site-to-site VPN tunnel only happen when the traffic generated from the remote peer. is it possible to keep the still active tunnel once after the tunnel is established.
My requirement is to monitor VPN to see availability, so need to ping one of the natd(8) ip on the remote end, but it will come only when the traffic generated end peer. currently the timers of default on SA is configured
Help, please...
Thank you
Mikael
TARGET_GP group policy attributes
VPN-idle-timeout no
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is there a difference in using a port of loading of 1000 my vs 2100 to recharge my iphone 5
I have a portable power with 2 different tips to recharge my iPhone 5 of 1000 and 2100 mA; I know that the standard is 1000 mA, but I can use the em 2100 or a faster charge - they are both designed for 5 watts
-
CTRL + ARROW key does not work on excel.
Hello on my laptop HP 450, the ctrl + key is not working only not on excel. I think it is due to scroll keys, but I checked the on-screen keyboard, but scroll lock is off. Can someone pls. Thank you
-
a "windows security" screen jumped on my computer saying: I had the virus, my Mc
My scan McAfee Total Protection says I don't have and I had a chat with a technician from McAfee who checked and said: I do not have. What do you recommend if it happens again?
-
I have a laptop HP with Windows 7 which wouldn't start. After saving my files on a flash drive, I reset my computer to its new stadium, reloaded the files retrieved and reloaded my programs (mainly from MS Office). I have hepatitis e has recovered
-
BBM BBM stuck at "Setting up BBM surveys"
Hello I just bought a new 9320 curve, but cannot set up Blackberry Messenger. It is stuck at "Implementation of BBM surveys" with a continuous rotation in front of her loading icon. I tried to reinstall the Messenger and restart the phone, but the pr