static routes E2000 installation failure

Similar Questions

• Installation router E2000 works not

  I want to install router E2000 on a laptop with Vista and a wireless adapter Topdog Marvel... automatic installation said that he does not succeed... any ideas of what I can do to make this work?

  Thank you for having responded - we thought about it - my problem is that I had to uninstall our software Manager for Microsoft Wireless would serve as manager - once we have the router worked!

• General issues related to my router E2000

  Hello all - I recently bought/installed my E2000. Firmware version is1.0.o4, build7 and s/w version is 1.3.1106.1.I currently have a Kindle that connects wireless to the router E2000. NETWORK card in my computer doesn't have wireless capability and is connected to the router via an Ethernet cable. The two do not work properly. I have a printer HP OJ7410, which can be connected wireless or Ethernet cable. I have the following questions:

  1 did you install via the cd include the installation of wireless security?

  2. If I connect any additional device wireless including printer and the computer with the wireless adapter should I enter a PW for these devices?

  3. the addition of these devices via the Ethernet cable will require additional p/ws?

  Thank you-wardell1.

  answers:

  1. it depends on. When you have done the installation using the CD, you remember Setting uo WEP or WPA? If you have connected your kindle to the wireless signal, it asks a password (WEP or WPA)?

  2. Yes. all wireless devices attempting to connect to the router will be asked for a password. It is the idea of wireless security.

  3 nope. no need to pw only s when connecting via ethernet.

• Removing static route get % corresponding to any error no route to remove

  I'm trying to remove a static route, I added:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 #show ip route
  Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

  Gateway of last resort is not set

  172.168.0.0/29 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  S 172.168.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.2
  C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
  192.168.2.0/30 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
  R2 #conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  R2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
  % Corresponding to any no route to remove
  R2 (config) #r2 #show ip route

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I was training establishment of a static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1 (2600xm) via maps module T1 on the serial ports. connected to r1 is a router 2500 old called PC.

  I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 I connect to 2500 another console cable that I use to access a server I get the above error.  all IP addresses are just generic subnets that I created to play with static routing.   I can't remove someone has any ideas?

  you use the subnet mask different than the one you used. According to the route table entry mask is 29

  Try this,

  1] r2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.248 192.168.2.2

  or 2] another easy method would be to check the working config and copy stick with 'no' at the beginning.

  See the race | include the ip route

  Copy the static route statement and paste this what with 'no' in the global configuration and check the routing table.

• AnyConnect customers not to follow the internal static routes on ASA5505

  I just bought an ASA 5505 for my remote access to our internal network users.  I followed all the installation instructions, that I can find.  I am able to establish a VPN connection by using the Anyconnect client and can see some of my internal network. (In fact, only the subnet of the interface internal)  However, I have several subnets inside of my LAN which are then sent by another switch inside my LAN.  I have built in the correct static routes so that the ASA will send traffic to this internal routing for all subnets switch doesn't do not part of it is inside the subnet of the interface.  I can see and ping these subnets of the SAA itself but the AnyConnect client cannot.  Any suggestions on how to solve this problem would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  Please, add these lines and give it a try:

  inside_nat0_outbound list of permitted access 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed inside_nat0_outbound 203.250.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 172.100.0.0 255.255.0.0 allow 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 210.105.0.0 255.255.0.0 allow 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  Kind regards

  Note the useful messages!

  Julio

• I need help with an installation failure to interpret and troubleshoot a Setup log.

  Background: A few years ago, many editors of cinema used Final Cut Pro 6 (also contained in Final Cut Studio 2) for their editing projects.  Shared Apple Final Cut X uses a different format that is not compatible with FCP6.  Sometimes, these editors are called to work on a few historical projects that have been published in FCP6 and need this version to run now.

  Starting with OS X Lion, FCP6 would install not in Lion and thereafter.

  According research by Jeremy Johnston as noted on his blog, he discovered that Apple has inserted a file in the folder CoreServices in the Library folder of the system folder that causes versions the version Final Cut Pro X (and other older Apple programs in the same situation) do not settle.  He suggested changes to this file that would seek to prevent interfering with the installation of FCP6 in Lion, many users of final cut PRO 6 were successful in their efforts to install in Lion and work with it.

  Later in a discussion update on installing FCP6 in Mavericks, HawaiianHippie determined that the simplest way to perform the installation of FCP6 was simply copy this file and remove it from the system folder, install FCP6 and then restore the copied file:

  https://discussions.Apple.com/message/26309669#26309669

  I used this method with success to install FCS2 in Yosemite:

  

  [click on images to enlarge]

  However, in my attempts to install FCS2 in El Capitan, it fails in the last 5% to install the first DVD:

  

  

  First of all, I need advice on how to display an extremely large Setup log in this thread (on MacRumors, it is a method to insert a 'code' in a small box that can be the object of a scrollbar if necessary to read all along).  I am unable to find such a method to post here.

  Then once approved, I need help to determine which component is causing the installation to fail and perhaps this element can be omitted from the installation:

  

  If this element is not required, then maybe FCP6 can be installed successfully without it.  And if that omitted element is necessary, perhaps a manual method to install it can be determined by pacifists.

  It is my goal to help those who need to install and use FCP6 on their new Macs running El Capitan.

  Here is the post on MacRumors with pre-installed Setup log:

  http://forums.MacRumors.com/threads/i-need-help-with-an-installation-failure-to-interpret-and-troubleshoot-an-Installer-log.1954786/#post-22541389

• Removal of Installation failures

  How to remove installation failures 'X' from my update history list?

  All you need to do is remove all the contents of the DataStore folder
  Start, run, type: %windir%\SoftwareDistribution\
  This opens the C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution folder, which is normally found in C:\Windows

  Microsoft - Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer.
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-AU/security/cc184924.aspx

  May be appropriate to check to see if all your security updates were installed

  Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA) is an easy to use tool designed for the professional that helps small and medium businesses determine their security state in accordance with Microsoft security recommendations and offers specific advice for remediation of COMPUTING. Improve your process of managing security using MBSA to detect security current and missing security updates on your computer systems.

  TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2010 - Update Services

• any ideas? Installation failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0 x 80070663: update of security for Microsoft Office System 2007 (KB972581). That's what I get away

  Installation failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0 x 80070663: update of security for Microsoft Office System 2007 (KB972581).

  
  

  any ideas?

  Suggestion: Try to do a repair of Office 2007 installation, then try the updates (after a reboot).

  How to install and repair 2007 Office features
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/924611 TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2010 - Update Services

• Update for microsoft security essetials KB2804527 (4.2.223.1) installation failure error code: 0x8004FF83 all other updates installed OK

  Update for Microsoft Security Essetials KB2804527 (4.2.223.1) Installation failure error Code: 0x8004FF83 all other updates installed OK.

  What version of Microsoft Security Essentials you run?

  What operating system and service pack?

  Prior security software?

  No matter what security software installed again?

  Please read the following:

  A possible reason for this problem is that you have installed entirely or partially on the PC security software conflict. Remove all other computer security software.

  You may need to use a cleaning tool to remove your prior security software:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/protect/Forum/protect_start/list-of-anti-malware-program-cleanupuninstall/407bf6da-C05D-4546-8788-0aa4c25a1f91

  The current time and the date now in Ohio, the United States is

  07:28

  Wednesday, February 27, 2013
  UTC - 0500 (EST) Eastern Standard time

  UTC/GMT is 12:28 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

  Current weather conditions in Columbus

  Cloudy4 ° C / 40 ° F

• AutomaticUpdates failure content install installation failure: error 0 x 80070643 (KB2446704)

  Receiver AutomaticUpdates failed to update critical KB2446704 that was not not for more than a week.

  Need help to get this KB2446704 update to install.
  Note: Don't know if it's related but have 2 sites that produce the error "there is a problem with the website's security certificate"
  https://SA.www4.IRS.gov/irfof/IRServlet?app=IRFOF&selectLanguage=en (this is the site of the IRS to verify the tax refund)
  https://chaseonline.Chase.com/logon.aspx
  ? error = L009 & LOB = RBGLogon & src = https % 3A % 2F % 2F www.chase.com%2FChase.html (logon credit card site)
  (The AutomaticUpdates.log error message is as follows

  AutomaticUpdates content installation failed

  Installation failure: Windows failed to install the

  After the update with error 0 x 80070643: security

  Update for .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5 SP1 on

  Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86

  (KB2446704).
  Information for an attempt are as follows:
  2011-04-28 16:10:18:609 5656

  Manager of 13f0: WARNING: command line

  installation is complete. Return code = 0 x 00000643, result

  = Failed, reboot required = false

  2011-04-28 16:10:18:609 5656

  Manager of 13f0: WARNING: exit code =.

  08024200 × b

  2011-04-28 16:10:18:609 5656

  Manager 13f0:

  2011-04-28 16:10:18:609 5656

  Manager of 13f0: END: Manager: order

  Installation of the line

  2011-04-28 16:10:18:609 5656

  Manager 13f0:

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:423 1260

  1248 DnldMgr * DnldMgr: new

  Download [UpdateId = {52773724-A61E - 4AEC - job

  [9130 B3F5E3A896C5}.102] *.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:423 1260

  1248 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -

  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - update 52773724-

  A61E-4AEC-9130-B3F5E3A896C5 is "PerUpdate".

  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913

  AcceptRate vs 0.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr * update is not allowed to

  Download due to regulations.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -

  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - update 52773724-

  A61E-4AEC-9130-B3F5E3A896C5 is "PerUpdate".

  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913

  AcceptRate vs 0.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr * DnldMgr: new

  Download [UpdateId = {D 5B258DAE-379 - 46E2 - job

  [BE71-FFD9E9A6A937}.102] *.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -

  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - 5B258DAE - update

  379D-46E2-BE71-FFD9E9A6A937 is "PerUpdate".

  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913

  AcceptRate vs 0.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr * update is not allowed to

  Download due to regulations.

  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260

  1248 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -

  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - 5B258DAE - update

  379D-46E2-BE71-FFD9E9A6A937 is "PerUpdate".

  regulated and can NOT download
  . Sequence 7913
  AcceptRate vs 0.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  83 TO THE > # RETURN # TO THE:
  Update [UpdateId = {1 d 721166 - A401-
  447-86AF-9C7FA3386A6D}]
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  83 to # WARNING: installation failed.
  error = 0 x 80070643 / 0 x 00000643
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr * DnldMgr: new
  Download [UpdateId = {52773724-A61E - 4AEC - job
  [9130 B3F5E3A896C5}.102] *.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -
  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - update 52773724-
  A61E-4AEC-9130-B3F5E3A896C5 is "PerUpdate".
  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913
  AcceptRate vs 0.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr * update is not allowed to
  Download due to regulations.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -
  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - update 52773724-
  A61E-4AEC-9130-B3F5E3A896C5 is "PerUpdate".
  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913
  AcceptRate vs 0.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr * DnldMgr: new
  Download [UpdateId = {D 5B258DAE-379 - 46E2 - job
  [BE71-FFD9E9A6A937}.102] *.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -
  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - 5B258DAE - update
  379D-46E2-BE71-FFD9E9A6A937 is "PerUpdate".
  regulated and can NOT download. Sequence 7913
  AcceptRate vs 0.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr * update is not allowed to
  Download due to regulations.
  2011-04-28 16:10:21:433 1260
  16e8 DnldMgr rules: {7971F918 - A847 -
  4430 9279-4A52D1EFE18D} - 5B258DAE - update
  379D-46E2-BE71-FFD9E9A6A937 is "PerUpdate".
  regulated and can NOT download
  . Sequence 7913
  AcceptRate vs 0.
  2011-04-28 16:10:22:695 1260
  16e8 report REPORT EVENT: {9A99CD38
  {- 2BAB - 492 A - 85A 2 - C6F8278C9AE7} 2011-04 -.
  16:10:21:443 28-0400 1 198
  101 {1 D 721166-A401-447 - 86AF-
  9C7FA3386A6D} 105 80070643
  AutomaticUpdates content installation failed
  Installation failure: Windows failed to install the
  After the update with error 0 x 80070643: security
  Update for .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5 SP1 on
  Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP x 86
  (KB2446704).

  Hi Johnny,

  1. You are able to install some other updates without any problems?
     What web browser do you use? If it is Internet Explorer, then which version do you use?

  I suggest to try the steps from the link to the following article and check to see if it helps:

  You receive the error 0 x 643, error code 0 x 80070643 or updates may be offered again when you try to install the .NET Framework updates when you use Windows Update or Microsoft Updates
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/KB976982

  Also, for certificate errors, you can have a look on the link of the article following if you are using Internet Explorer 7 or 8:

  About certificate errors
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/about-certificate-errors (Applicable for Windows XP)

  I hope this helps.

• Static route / network Configuration?

  I have a cable modem that connects via Ethernet (eth0) of a configuration for NAT and Firewall Linux box.  Another card (eth1) connects to a switch for my cable network (192.168.1.1/24).  I added a third adapter (eth2 - 192.168.2.1/24) which is connected to a M20 (192.168.2.2).  The server DHCP M20 has been implemented to serve the 192.168.3.1/24 network.

  Is there a configuration more simple than that?

  Problems reported with the current configuration:

  (1) I think the M20 NAT function must be disabled because the Linux machine is.  However, disable NAT causes machines on 192.168.3 bad connection to the internet.

  (2) I want the machines wirelessly on 192.168.3 to see shared windows on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  Currently they do not see each other.  If I remove M20 and plug a PC eth2 and set as 192.168.2.2, this machine can see actions on 192.168.1 and vice versa.  I think a static route must be set on the M20 so that he knows what to do with traffic to 192.168.1.  However, I don't properly because he always tells me I have an invalid route when I try to enter.

  (3) is there one another device other than on the M20 motorway which would better suit my needs (adding a wireless to my private/internal network segment)?

  Kind regards

  Case No.

  OK, I just saw the previous thread on this question pop up on the first page,

  Valet parking can be defined as an access point only?

  I'll try the posted instructions here.

• Static routing LRT214 does not

  Hello

  I have a hard time with a static routing on LRT214.

  My configuration:

  * LRT214 (recently purchased), acting as a gateway to the internet, local subnet is 192.168.28.0/24

  * There is a local VPN (192.168.28.98) server on the local network, serving a LAN tunnel with subnet 192.168.29.0/24. on LRT214 port forwarding is configured

  I can connect to my VPN server on the internet, and I can access the machine running on the VPN server (for example via ssh).

  However, I can not connect to any other computer on my LAN, although I tried

  adding another subnet under Configuration > network > LAN settings

  * setting up a static route under Setup > Advanced Routing (kind of route add - net 192.168.29.0/24 gw 192.168.28.98)

  of course, when I add the itinerary of statitc over any computer on the local network, I can connect via VPN tunnel to the machine, so its clearly a problem of LRT214.

  Please help, how can I configure a static route for this scenario in the user Web interface?

  The SPI Firewall, intercept traffic.

  As far as I understand, it could be that when the VPN server sends data to another machine on the local network, this happens on layer 2 (where the SPI Firewall not listening), while the return on the VPN server traffic is routed higher up in the stack, where the SPI listening and intercept.

  So, I will use the above workarounds, or put the OpenVPN server on a different subnet or VLAN, which I do anyway. I tried a basic configuration of VLAN yesterday (just put the Server full VPN with all interfaces in one VLAN separated), with InterVLAN routing enabled, but there seems to be some particularities with it (like the ping works, but not ssh). In any case, it's another story. Thanks for you support.

• Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

  Hi all

  I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

  My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
  The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

  My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

  However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

  I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

  However, the road does not work yet.

  in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

  Thanks for your help!

  Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

  You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

  If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

• INF installation failure

  whenever I use the disk cleaner I get message infinstall failed.

  reason: IO operation has been abandoned due to a thread exit or an application request

  Hello

  1 did you change on your computer?

  2 are you referring to disk cleanup in Windows or the disc cleaner as a third-party software?

  Incorrect registry permissions as appropriate, would result in the INF installation failure error. Reason: Access is denied.

  Method 1:

  Try to reregister the Windows Installer Service, and then run again the product in this step:

  a. on the ""Start " menu, click on"run:.

  b. in the ""Open " box, type"msiexec /unreg"and press ENTER."

  "c. on the" "Start" menu, click on "run".

  d. in the ""Open " box, type"msiexec/regserver"and press ENTER."

  Method 2:

  I also suggest you to follow the link and check.

  How to use the System File Checker tool to fix the system files missing or corrupted on Windows Vista or Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

• It is a way to password protect guess access on a router E2000 wireless?

  I want to put in place access invited to my router E2000, but only for a few friends, not my entire neighborhood. When I created originally by Cisco Connect, I was able to set up an account with a password, but it shows up in my registration non-secure wireless - you don't need the password to access. Is there a way to password protect the connection without comment thread?

  Yes, it does not appear to be unsafe, but in order to be able to surf you need generates the Cisco Connect password.

  So no, it is not open, but I think they are always connected to the router, and that's not good either.